Biden Sabotages Kamala Harris, Connects Her to Current Admin.

(Dmytro “Henry” Aleksandrov, Headline USA) Even though Kamala Harris and the people who work for her campaign have tried their best to distance Harris from the Joe Biden administration, Biden still does everything possible to ensure Harris is still associated with the disastrous administration.

On Sept. 25, 2024, Biden appeared on The View and, while there, discussed how involved Harris was during the administration, indirectly saying that she was also partially responsible for everything that the Biden-Harris administration did.

“As Vice President, there wasn’t a single thing that I did that she couldn’t do, and so I was able to delegate her responsibility on everything from foreign policy to domestic policy,” Biden said.

The video clip became viral on Twitter, and many conservatives quickly pointed out that Harris probably would never be able to distance herself from the administration, which could make her less popular among voters.

The recent news came while the Harris campaign was trying to distance itself from Biden and the current administration.

On Aug. 14, 2024, the New York Post published an exclusive report that shared the comments of a Democratic campaign operative who stated that Harris was trying to disassociate herself from Biden because his polling numbers on issues like the economy were “horrible” and would, therefore, not help her campaign.

Harris did something similar during the last presidential debate on ABC News.

“Clearly, I am not Joe Biden, and I am certainly not Donald Trump,” she said.

This was not the only time Biden tried to sabotage Harris’s presidential campaign. During his speech at the Democratic National Convention, he also linked Harris to the administration.

“We’ve had one of the most extraordinary four years of progress ever. Period. When I say we, I mean Kamala and me,” Biden said, according to Time.

Another viral moment was when Biden wore a red Make America Great Again hat while visiting firefighters in Pennsylvania.

Another George Floyd? Politicians, Media, Celebrities Make New Victim

(Dmytro “Henry” Aleksandrov, Headline USA) The leftist regime tries to use every opportunity to keep Kamala Harris in the White House. This time, it decided to create a new George Floyd-like figure by making a criminal a victim simply because he is black.

According to CNN, in 2001, 55-year-old Marcellus Williams from Missouri was convicted of stabbing Felicia Gayle 43 times inside her St. Louis home in 1998. Recently, the Supreme Court decided to execute Williams via a lethal injection, which happened on Sept. 24, 2024.

Leftists from all walks of life used the opportunity to push another racial division in this country, potentially creating this year’s “October surprise.”

“We must abolish the death penalty,” Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., wrote.

Tristan Snell, a lawyer, also tried to point out the non-existent hypocrisy.

“The same six justices who claim to be ‘pro-life’ just signed off on the lynching of an innocent black man,” he wrote.

Hollywood actors like George Takei also spread lies about Williams, claiming he was innocent.

“A nation that allows an innocent man to be executed does not value justice. A governor and a High Court that do nothing to stop such a travesty do not value life,” he wrote.

As expected, race hustlers like Ibram X. Kendi couldn’t leave the opportunity to claim that the United States is a “serial killer of black people.”

The mass media also pushed the propaganda about a black man who was not only wrongfully accused but was also defended by the victim’s family, who called to spare his life.

Not surprisingly, it looks and sounds like the “gentle giant” narrative pushed by the same media in 2020 when Floyd died.

Conservatives on Twitter pushed back against the propaganda by stating that Williams was a career criminal who murdered an innocent woman.

“This isn’t a remotely difficult case,” Sean Fitzgerald, the creator of the Actual Justice Warrior YouTube channel, wrote.

Some people on Twitter suggested that the Left will use William’s conviction to repeat the domestic terror that they started in 2020, adding that the family was probably pressured to be on the side of the one who murdered someone they love.

“Is this the new George Floyd?” the person wrote.

Treacherous Ex-Trump Foes Try to Worm Their Way Back into His Graces

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) They are coming back to Poppa.

Meta owner Mark Zuckerberg and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy are trying to kiss President Donald Trump’s ring after cozying up to the left—just in time for the 2024 election. 

This week, several outlets reported that both Zuckerberg and Zelenskyy have engaged in private conversations with Trump in a potential bid to secure their positions in the Republican candidate’s good graces should he emerge victorious in November. 

The Facebook founder reportedly enlisted Republican strategist Brian Baker to whitewash his image among conservative media and Republican officials, the liberal New York Times reported on Tuesday.

Baker allegedly assured Trump that Zuckerberg has no plans to interfere in the 2024 election in the same controversial manner as he did in 2020 when he donated over $300 million to a leftist non-profit that ultimately issued grants in several swing states. 

Republicans have long argued that these grants were strategically designed to help Democrats in 2020, prompting 28 states and 12 counties to enact laws restricting or banning what became known as “Zuck Bucks.”

The tech mogul also allegedly told Trump there was “no way” he would vote for a Democrat in the 2024 election.

Seemingly taking cues from Zuckerberg, Zelenskyy’s aides reached out to the Trump campaign to arrange a private meeting with the former president, according to a screenshot of a message shared by Trump on Truth Social.

The message, sent by Ukrainian Deputy Ambassador Denys Sienik to the MAGA team, was successful as Trump confirmed a future meeting during a press conference on Thursday.

In the message to Trump, Zelenskyy claimed, “Days ago, we requested a meeting with you, and I really want to hear your thoughts directly, and firsthand. You know I always speak with great respect about everything connected to you, and that’s how it should be.”

This statement directly contradicts Zelenskyy’s past comments and actions against Trump. In January 2024, the Ukrainian president expressed he was “frightened” by the prospect of Trump returning to the White House.

Zelenskyy also targeted Trump’s running mate, Sen. JD Vance, calling him “too radical” during a Sunday interview with The New Yorker.

This criticism came during the same period Zelenskyy was unashamedly touring a weapons manufacturing factory in Pennsylvania, alongside Gov. Josh Shapiro, a high-profile surrogate for Vice President Kamala Harris.

Rapper’s Lawyer Explains Trove of Lube and Baby Oil Found in Raid: ‘He Buys in Bulk’

(Chris Cella Jr., Headline USA) Mark Agnifilo, a lawyer representing embattled rap mogul Sean “Diddy” Combs, said Thursday that Costco was to blame for the thousands of bottles of lube and baby oil among the contraband that police seized during a raid on Combs’s mansions, TMZ reported.

But a judge and jury may not be so quick to let it slide. The discovery could bolster the Justice Department’s claims that Combs used his media empire to build a sex-trafficking network.

“[Diddy] buys in bulk,” Agnifilo said.

“I think they have Costcos in every place where he has a home,” he added. “… Have you sat in a Costco parking lot and seen what people walk out with?”

A Costco spokesperson clarified to TMZ that none of its U.S. stores carry, stock or sell baby oil.

Combs was arrested last week on charges stemming from a multi-year investigation after allegations of sexual abuse and exploitation of women began to surface—including a surveillance camera video of him allegedly attacking an ex-girlfriend in a hotel corridor.

Federal agents took Combs into custody on charges of sex trafficking, racketeering conspiracy, and transportation to engage in prostitution on Sept 16. He pleaded not guilty but was denied bail and remains in custody as a flight risk.

If convicted, he could face a life sentence. As of Thursday, Combs was on suicide watch at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn, New York.

According to Forbes, the saga has ensnared several high-profile celebrities who were mentored by or partied with Combs. Celebrities like Kim Kardashian, Paris Hilton, Sarah Jessica Parker, Mariah Carey and Leonardo DiCaprio have been photographed at Combs’s “White Parties.”

Combs was also known for the “freak offs” at his “White Parties,” described as orgies involving narcotics, alcohol, and Costco-sized bottles of lube and baby oil.

R&B star Usher Raymond, who first met Combs in 1994, told Rolling Stone that the “It’s All About the Benjamins” rapper had “introduced me to a totally different set of s**t—sex, specifically.”

Raymond’s Twitter feed was deleted after Combs’s arrest, which he claimed was due to hacking.

Justin Bieber has also been caught in Combs’s controversy. In 2009, Bieber, then 15, posted a video with Combs, who announced that Bieber would spend “48 hours with Diddy,” doing things “we can’t really disclose, but it’s definitely a 15-year-old’s dream.”

Some online speculation has centered around the possibility that Bieber himself may have been sexually abused while in Combs’s care.

Rapper and longtime Combs critic Curtis “50 Cent” Jackson is producing a Netflix documentary on the scandal titled Diddy Do It?

Jackson promoted the documentary on social media, renaming the classic Johnson & Johnson baby oil bottle “Diddy Oil” with the caption, “Coming soon! LOL.”

When referencing Combs’s alleged orgies, labeled by the prosecution as “freak-offs,” Agnifilo said, “Back when I was a kid in the late ’70s, they were called threesomes.”

He proclaimed his client’s innocence and added that Combs remains cooperative with the investigation.

Agnifilo also disputed the number of lube and baby oil bottles found, saying, “I don’t think it was a thousand. Let’s just say it was a lot.”

He added, “One bottle of baby oil goes a long way. I don’t know what you need a thousand for.”

Trump Demands Pelosi Be Prosecuted for Insider Trading Scandal

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) President Donald Trump demanded on Thursday that former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi be prosecuted for her alleged role in insider trading and for her failure to protect the Capitol during the Jan. 6 riots. 

Trump made these remarks during a press conference in New York City, where he lambasted the Biden-Harris administration’s disastrous policies before turning his attention to Pelosi. 

“Nancy Pelosi has a little problem because her husband sold their visa stock… one day before Visa was announced that Visa’s being sued by the Department of Justice. Think of that,” Trump declared. 

Trump’s remarks follow a report by the New York Post revealing that Pelosi’s husband, Paul Pelosi, offloaded over $500,000 worth of Visa stock—less than three months before the Biden-Harris DOJ launched antitrust charges against the company.

“Nancy Pelosi sold vast amounts of Visa stock one day before the big lawsuit that we all read about a few days ago was brought against Visa. [Do] you think it was luck? I don’t think. She should be prosecuted,” Trump added, before citing new information about what really happened on Jan. 6.

New transcripts of former Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Mark Milley’s remarks to the Department of Defense Inspector General show that Trump urged Pentagon officials to ensure safety on Jan. 6. 

This revelation directly contradicts leftist narratives pushed by Pelosi, who blamed Trump for the violence on Jan. 6, citing his alleged failure to deploy the National Guard. However, Trump has now turned the tables, demanding Pelosi be held accountable. 

“She should also be prosecuted for J6 because she turned down 10,000 or any numbers you wanted, soldiers or National Guard,” Trump continued. 

The transcript resurfaced thanks to House Administration Oversight Subcommittee Chairman Barry Loudermilk, R-Ga., as he investigates the partisan actions of the now-defunct Jan. 6 Committee.

“President Trump met with senior Pentagon leaders and directed them to make sure any events on January 6, 2021 were safe,” Loudermilk said in a press statement. “It is very concerning that these Senior Pentagon officials ignored President Trump’s guidance AND misled Congressional Leaders to believe they were doing their job, when they were not.” 

The transcripts show Milley telling the Inspector General, “The President just says, ‘Hey look at this. It’s going to be a large amount of protesters come in here on the 6th, and make sure that you have sufficient National Guard or Soldiers to make sure it’s a safe event.’”

Biden in Full-Fledged Denial about Coup on ‘The View’

(Victoria Cook, Headline USA) President Joe Biden insisted Wednesday that abandoning his  reelection campaign was his decision because his successful presidency had left him with time to spare, as reported by the New York Post.

The 81-year-old appeared to be in denial during his appearance on The View about the internal coup that Democrat party elites undertook, threatening to invoke the 25th amendment to have him declared unfit for office, as well as yanking all his financial support.

He repeated the scripted sentiment he gave at the Democratic National Convention—he was honored to serve and loved his job but he loved his country more.

He then said that he thought it was “better” for him to step down.

Even so, Biden seemed reluctant to answer, measuring his words carefully. 

When host Sara Haines asked if he was at peace with his decision, Biden replied affirmatively before adding that he was supposed to be a “transitional president,” as he pledged to be during the 2020 debates, when concerns over his age first arose.

“I found myself having used more time than I would have ordinarily to, you know, pass the torch,” he claimed.

Biden’s “decision” came almost a month after his first presidential debate with President Donald J. Trump, which showcased his limited cognitive functions. Immediately following, Democrats called for Biden to remove himself from the presidential race.

The duplicitous scheme was enough to draw a rare rebuke from leftist host Whoopi Goldberg. “I don’t like the way they did it,” she observed. “I didn’t like the way it was done publicly.”

Former Speaker Nancy Pelosi, R-Calif., played a key role in removing Biden from running, unabashedly wielding her political power to force him out.

Biden did not answer host Alyssa Farah Griffin when she asked about his relationship with Pelosi.

Instead, Biden acknowledged that some people wanted him to step aside so they could get ahead, though he did not name those people.

“But that wasn’t the reason that I stepped down,” he claimed. “I stepped down because I started thinking about [my age].”

Biden joked that he was getting too old to remember his age, which was met with laughter from the hosts and audience.

Biden’s age has long been a subject of concern, although many Democrats only decided it was serious enough to act when faced with the prospect of his political defeat to Trump, and not the alarmingly haphazard execution of his official duties.

Biden has maintained, contrary to what most polls indicated he was in a strong position to win again.

“I was confident I would beat Trump,” Biden said. “He’s a loser.”

Nonetheless, some have speculated that Biden may quietly be disgruntled about his Democratic mistreatment. Shortly after the Sept. 10 debate between Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris, Biden donned a MAGA hat given to him by a Trump supporter while commemmorating the Sept. 11 anniversary in New York.

NBC Shill Claims ‘Misogyny’ (Not Inflation) to Blame for Kamala’s Low Marks on Economy

(Jacob Bruns, Headline USA) Notorious left-wing media shill Andrea Mitchell claimed Wednesday that presidential candidate Kamala Harris was polling poorly with respect to her ability to manage the nation’s economy because of misogyny among voters, Breitbart reported.

Mitchell, NBC News’s chief Washington correspondent and chief foreign affairs correspondent, delivered the line in her show, MSNBC’s Andrea Mitchell Reports, while speaking with Sen. Bob Casey, D-Penn.

“Our latest polling shows that Kamala Harris, on the economy, is nine points behind Donald Trump,” Mitchell said at the start of the segment.

“What has to happen to try to narrow that gap on the economy, which is what most people care about?” she then asked Casey.

Casey replied by blaming corporations for being greedy, but soon Mitchell stepped in and stole the show, blaming men for “lagging behind” their female counterparts.

“There’s probably a lot of misogyny going on there also, because men are still lagging behind in the polling,” Mitchell claimed, adding that, “that’s hard to quantify.”

Still, Mitchell was certainly correct to argue that men are far more likely to support GOP candidate Donald Trump—if that can be called “lagging behind”—than women, whether that is because of misogyny or some other reason.

According to an MSNBC report following the 2020 election, women went approximately 57 % for the Biden–Harris ticket compared to 42% for Trump.

And yet, there may be reasons other than misogyny for Harris to be down in economic polls—not the least of which was the very successful Trump economy that began shortly after the November 2016 election and lasted until the March 2020 pandemic crash.

Even then, Trump had managed to achieve a respectable start to economic recovery with the arrival of vaccines before record Bidenflation crippled the American middle class under Harris’s watch.

In a last-ditch effort to salvage Harris’s reputation, mainstream economists teamed up with the media to endorse Harris and promote her economic vision.

“The choice in this election is clear: between failed trickle-down economic policies that benefit the few and economic policies that provide opportunity for all,” the endorsement document said.

Kamala Appears Confused When Asked How She’ll Pay for Her Policies

(Headline USA) Vice President Kamala Harris appeared genuinely confused when asked this week how she would secure funding for her proposals if Republicans still control Congress after November’s election.

Harris sat down with MSNBC’s Stephanie Ruhle on Wednesday for her second ever solo interview. At one point, Ruhle asked Harris how she would find the spending for an increased child tax credit or downpayment assistance for first-time homebuyers if she’s unable to pass legislation.

“If you can’t raise corporate taxes, or if the GOP takes control of the Senate, where do you get the money to do that? Do you still go for those plans and borrow?” Ruhle asked.

“Well…but, we’re going to have to raise corporate taxes,” Harris replied, with a look of confusion.

“We’re going to have to make sure that the biggest corporations and billionaires pay their fair share,” she continued. “That’s just it. It’s about paying their fair share.”

She did not explain how she plans to raise the corporate tax rate without congressional support.

Harris also dodged a question from Ruhle on how she plans to ensure U.S. businesses hit with an increased corporate tax rate stay in the U.S.

“Well, listen, I work with a lot of CEOs,” Harris said. “I have spent a lot of time with CEOs. And I’m going to tell you that the business leaders who are actually part of the engine of America’s economy agree that people should pay their fair share.”

Ruhle admitted afterwards that Harris didn’t give clear or direct answers to her questions, but argued those non-answers don’t really matter.

“It’s complicated, right?” Ruhle told MSNBC’s Chris Hayes afterward.

“We’re a country of 330 million people, our economy is complicated,” she continued. “… And one could watch that and say, ‘Well, she didn’t give a clear, direct answer.’ That’s OK, because we are not talking about clear or direct issues.”

Harris’s critics, however, offered a different explanation.

“She’s just an idiot,” wrote commentator Drew Hernandez.

Sen. Tommy Tuberville, R-Ala., agreed, arguing Harris doesn’t even seem to know basic economics.

“Kamala Harris is the first ever AI presidential candidate,” he wrote on X. “It’s embarrassing.”

Anti-Cop Democratic Socialist Could Become Acting NYC Mayor if Eric Adams Resigns

(Headline USA) A radical Democratic socialist who sought to defund New York City’s police department could take over the reins of the city’s government if Mayor Eric Adams resigns or is forced out of office.

Adams was indicted on federal corruption charges this week, leading several high-ranking city officials and Democrats to demand his resignation. Adams rebuffed those demands on Wednesday, arguing he was being unfairly targeted.

However, if Adams were to step down or if he were forced out, the line of succession in New York City means his office would temporarily go to Public Advocate Jumaane Williams, who would then set the date for a special election and serve as mayor until a new mayor is elected.

As public advocate, Williams is a non-voting member of the City Council, but he can introduce and co-sponsor bills. 

Williams and Adams frequently clashed over Williams’s far-left proposals, including a police reform bill Williams sponsored earlier this year that would have slashed the New York Police Department’s budget.

Williams, a vocal Black Lives Matter supporter, has also advocated ending solitary confinement in city prisons and is a prominent anti-Israel activist.

“A wounded Eric Adams, a weakened Eric Adams remaining in office, is better than the socialist Jumaane Williams,” former New York City mayoral candidate Curtis Sliwa told the Daily Mail. “That will open up the floodgates to socialism, and we will become Chicago.”

One of Williams’s closest allies is Rep. Alexandria Ocasio–Cortez, D-N.Y., who has also butted heads with Adams over his more moderate policies.

In a statement on Wednesday, before the federal charges against Adams were even announced, Ocasio–Cortez called on the mayor to resign over federal investigations into other members of his administration.

“I do not see how Mayor Adams can continue governing New York City,” Ocasio–Cortez wrote on X. “The flood of resignations and vacancies are threatening gov function. Nonstop investigations will make it impossible to recruit and retain a qualified administration. For the good of the city, he should resign.”

Hillary Clinton Says ‘Deplorable’ Is ‘Too Kind’ of a Word For Trump Supporters

(Headline USA) Failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton defended calling supporters of former President Donald Trump “deplorables” during the 2016 campaign, arguing the term was actually “too kind.”

In an op-ed for the Washington Post on Wednesday, the sociopathic ex-secretary of State said she struggles to empathize with “radicalized individuals,” including Trump supporters. That’s why, in 2016, she felt so comfortable insulting them.

Clinton claimed that half of Trump’s supporters—approximately 32 million Americans, or a tenth of the total U.S. population at the time—fit her definition of “radicalized.”

And although she initially apologized for the comment, Clinton said she now stands by it.

“I was talking about the people who are drawn to his racism, sexism, homophobia, xenophobia, Islamophobia—you name it. The people for whom his bigotry is a feature, not a bug,” Clinton wrote.

“It was an unfortunate choice of words and bad politics, but it also got at an important truth,” she claimed. “Just look at everything that has happened in the years since, from Charlottesville to Jan. 6.”

It is now clear that “if anything, ‘deplorable’ is too kind of a word for the hate and violent extremism we’ve seen from some Trump supporters,” Clinton added.

The Democrat then reiterated her previous suggestion that Trump supporters needed to be “deprogram[med] and rehabilitate[d]” in order to “pull [the country] out of the madness.”

However, Clinton said she worries it’s no longer possible to save them.

“Talking about the ‘deplorables’ in 2016, I said, ‘Some of those folks, they are irredeemable.’ Part of me would still say this is objectively true,” she wrote.

“Just look at the lack of remorse from many of the Jan. 6 insurrectionists who’ve been convicted of sedition and other crimes,” she continued. “But another part of me wants to believe something else. I’d like to believe there’s goodness in everyone and a chance at redemption, no matter how remote.”

As Trump put it during his final presidential debate against Clinton in 2016, “Such a nasty woman.”