Iran Claims a Strike on a US Ship in the Strait of Hormuz

(Headline USAIran said Sunday it struck an unmanned U.S. vessel trying to enter the Strait of Hormuz, a claim that the U.S. military dismissed as a “total lie.”

It was the latest salvo in a new flare-up of fighting between the two countries.

The purported attack came a day after the U.S. military said forces struck three Iranian oil tankers in response to a missile attack on Navy warships.

The war began with U.S. and Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28. But since a ceasefire agreement was announced in June, on-and-off fighting has persisted, with both sides trying to inflict military and economic pain as negotiations have collapsed.

Strikes come about a week after fighting resumed

The United States and Iran resumed attacks last week, following a month of relative calm, with the Strait of Hormuz and Iranian communities along it again being targeted. At least five people were killed earlier in the week during a U.S. bombardment of southern Iran.

The Trump administration appears to have adopted a dual-prong approach to the conflict, responding militarily to attacks on the strait while going after foreign financial institutions that handle Iran’s money.

But Tehran’s hard-line new senior leaders have signaled a willingness to dig in after weathering decades of sanctions.

Iran has found ways over the years to circumvent sanctions, and now the U.S. blockade, and get its oil to buyers to help ease growing economic pressures. That relies in part on a shadow fleet transporting its oil.

Meanwhile, Iran’s nuclear program, the issue that contributed to the outbreak of the war, was meant to be addressed in negotiations that fell apart soon after the U.S. and Iran signed a memorandum of understanding in mid-June.

Diplomats say the U.S., Britain, France and Germany seek to refer Iran to the U.N. Security Council for failure to comply with its nuclear nonproliferation obligations.

Instead, Tehran’s new leverage focuses on the Strait of Hormuz that is crucial to global oil and natural gas shipments and was seen as an international waterway before the war began.

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

Democrat Conspiracy Claims Elon Musk Stole 2024 Election for Trump

(Luis CornelioHeadline USA) Billionaire Elon Musk had a peculiar reaction to a new documentary’s insinuation that he may have used Starlink to meddle in the 2024 presidential election to benefit President Donald Trump.

“Lmao,” an acronym for “laughing my ass off,” Musk wrote via X. He was responding directly to journalist Michael Shellenberger’s reporting on Musk, a documentary by Alex Gibney.

The documentary, reported on by The Hollywood Reporter on Sept. 2, features Musk’s former girlfriend and mother to one of his children, Ashley St. Clair, who claimed that Musk had a “degree of certainty” about the results of the election before they were released that she “had never seen before.”

St. Clair went on to claim that Musk told her before the election that “he was going to unleash the ‘anomaly in the matrix.'”

According to THR, the documentary showed a text message between St. Clair and Musk, with Musk allegedly writing: “I have ten thousand lasers in space.”

Asked by Gibney whether St. Clair believed Musk was referring to Starlink, St. Clair responded: “I mean, I don’t know where else he has space lasers.”

The allegations surrounding Musk’s comments echo broader disputes over Trump’s electoral victories.

After Trump’s 2016 victory, he faced years of claims that the Russian government had meddled in the election to help him.

Those claims paved the way for allegations that Trump had colluded with Russia to win the election. No evidence was ever found to substantiate the latter conspiracy theory.

FBI Called Islamic Center Shooter’s Mother before Attack

(Headline USAJust days before two teenagers carried out a mass shooting at a San Diego mosque, federal law enforcement officials warned the parents of one of the shooters that their son was making concerning comments about school shootings on the dark web, according to new details included in a recently filed lawsuit.

The mother of Caleb Vazquez alleges in her lawsuit that Park Mental Health Treatment of San Diego failed to intervene despite signs that her 18-year-old son posed an imminent threat to himself and others. Vazquez was living there and receiving treatment for a range of mental health conditions, including depression and psychotic episodes, the lawsuit says. The court filings follow a number of high-profile convictions of guardians who provided teenagers with weapons that were later used in mass shootings.

The FBI called Vazquez’s mother on the evening of May 14, and she said she immediately left a message with the treatment facility to notify its staff, according to the lawsuit, filed in a San Diego court on Aug. 31. Vazquez’s mother again shared the FBI’s warnings with her son’s therapist on May 15 and with a program director later that night.

On May 18, the morning of the shooting, employees at the facility contacted Vazquez’s mother to tell her that he was missing. Video surveillance footage subsequently showed Vazquez leaving the property at 8 p.m. the night before.

Vazquez’s parents were driving around looking for him on the morning of the shooting. Vazquez and another teenager killed three people at the San Diego mosque that day before taking their own lives.

It is unclear whether Vazquez was allowed to leave the previous evening or whether he broke facility rules by doing so. Park Mental Health offers a range of treatment options, some of which advertise 24-hour surveillance, while others provide more limited counseling.

The center did not immediately respond to an emailed request for comment Saturday afternoon. In a previous statement to radio station KPBS, Park Mental Health disputed the assertions in the lawsuit.

“While it is understandable that his parents might seek to blame someone in their time of loss, this lawsuit is misguided in that neither Park nor its employees are responsible for Mr. Vazquez’s actions,” the statement to KPBS read. “Only he and his coconspirator bear responsibility for their conduct and, ultimately, his death.”

An FBI spokesperson declined to comment Saturday, citing agency policy.

The FBI’s alleged contact with Vazquez’s parents was not the first sign of his mental deterioration.

Vazquez had been hospitalized for roughly three days in January 2026 after telling a classmate that he wanted to carry out a school shooting.

Almost exactly a year earlier, Vazquez was flagged to law enforcement for exhibiting alarming behavior and idolizing Nazis, prompting police to confiscate 26 guns from his father under a 2014 California law allowing firearms to be taken from people considered dangerous.

Authorities have said Vazquez met the other shooter, Cain Clark, 17, online and that both were radicalized there. Police have not shared more details about how they knew each other or specified whose weapons were used in the shooting.

The lawsuit was filed on the same day that North Carolina authorities announced the indictment of a 17-year-old in connection with the shooting.

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

Trump: Michael Cohen Recanted Testimony Behind NY Cases

(Luis CornelioHeadline USA) Michael Cohen, a key witness in the New York criminal and civil cases against President Donald Trump, has “fully recanted” his testimony in both cases, the Republican president announced Friday via Truth Social.

Previously known as Trump’s longtime fixer, Cohen was used by New York Attorney General Letitia James in her controversial civil lawsuit against the Trump Organization and by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg in his so-called hush money case against Trump.

The civil case against the Trump Organization culminated in a $364 million fine over claims Trump inflated his asset values to secure more favorable loans for his business. The fine was tossed by the New York Appellate Division, which ruled the amount violated Trump’s Eighth Amendment rights.

In his Truth Social post, Trump said Cohen was “‘pressured'” and “‘coerced'” into saying “things that were not true.”

The fallout between Trump and Cohen began after the 2016 election, after Cohen started cooperating with federal prosecutors.

Cohen was sentenced to three years in prison and served more than a year behind bars after pleading guilty to multiple charges, including making false statements to Congress.

Trump and Cohen have made amends in recent months, particularly after Cohen came forward saying he was pressured by New York prosecutors to testify against Trump.

Trump thanked Cohen “for having the Wisdom and Courage to step forward and do the right thing!”

“His Act of Bravery is a Great Credit to the Justice System in New York City and State,” Trump added, before demanding that the cases be dismissed. “I am sure it was not easy for him! Now we are asking that any remnant of those Politically Weaponized Cases against me be immediately terminated and dismissed.”

The president said that James and Bragg “broke the law in order to do this in order to prevent me from becoming the President of the United States. Such a thing can never be allowed to happen again!”

Trump appeared to be referring to a Jan. 16, 2026, Substack post in which Cohen accused prosecutors from James’ and Bragg’s offices of pressuring and coercing him to provide testimony that would help them build their cases against Trump.

Cohen wrote at the time:

“From the time I first began meeting with lawyers from the Manhattan DA’s Office and the New York Attorney General’s Office in connection with their investigations of President Trump, and through the trials themselves, I felt pressured and coerced to only provide information and testimony that would satisfy the government’s desire to build the cases against and secure a judgment and convictions against President Trump.”

He later added:

“I experienced a similar dynamic in the Attorney General’s civil case. Letitia James made it publicly known during her 2018 campaign for attorney general that, if elected, she would go after President Trump. Her office made clear that the testimony they wanted from me was testimony that would help them do just that. Again, I felt compelled and coerced to deliver what they were seeking.”

Ex-CNN Propagandist Don Lemon Mulls Presidential Run

(Luis CornelioHeadline USA) The Democratic Party has long attracted peculiarly strange individuals who have been floated as potential presidential candidates, including convicted felon Michael Avenatti, disgraced former first son Hunter Biden, Jerry Springer and anti-Trump filmmaker Michael Moore. Add former CNN anchor Don Lemon to that list.

Lemon, now a YouTuber whom CNN fired amid allegations of misogyny, toxic workplace behavior and friction with female coworkers, hinted at a potential presidential campaign in a Thursday interview with Politico.

“I’m not a politician. I’m a journalist. But now I get to learn about maybe what’s to come and how to do it,” Lemon said. “And maybe how to do it better.”

He later added that he would run for president if enough people ask. “I’m an American patriot. I’m a son of the South, and if people call on me to do it, I’ll do it.”

Lemon previously flirted with the idea of running for president on the July 15 episode of the Can’t Be Censored podcast, where he said he was “totally serious” about mounting a presidential campaign in 2028.

In response to a question about whether he has political ambitions, Lemon claimed that people have been asking him if he is running for president.

“And I don’t know. I might. I’m serious. I don’t know. I might, because people keep asking me to do it, or if I’m going to do it,” Lemon said.

In another interview with Vox, Lemon appeared to make the case for why he would be a better candidate than the politicians expected to join the crowded Democratic field for president in 2028.

“I’m not an insider and I am not a Democrat. I’d have to register as a Democrat in order to run,” Lemon claimed. Asked if he believed voters wanted an outsider, Lemon replied, “I think people want independence.”

Lemon has long claimed to be independent but has widely embraced policies heralded by the Democratic Party. For instance, he publicly voiced his support for the presidential campaign of then-Vice President Kamala Harris in 2024.

“I’m not a Democrat,” he said at the time during an interview on NewsNation. “Not a Democrat. Not a Republican. I’m an independent. … Some political leanings that are conservative and some that are liberal, like most people.”

A potential Lemon bid, however, would have to overcome some hurdles in his legal, professional and personal life.

Lemon is facing federal civil rights charges after he allegedly participated in a 2025 anti-ICE riot inside Cities Church in St. Paul, Minnesota. Lemon has pleaded not guilty.

Lemon hosted a primetime CNN show from 2014 until 2022 before he was publicly moved to a morning show. His stint as co-host of CNN This Morning fell apart after he said women in their 40s are past their “prime.”

He also repeatedly clashed with his co-hosts live on-air. Separately, an explosive Variety exposé accused Lemon of “diva-like behavior,” while describing tensions between him and colleagues.

In 2019, former bartender Dustin Hice filed a federal sexual assault lawsuit against Lemon, accusing the then-CNN anchor of fondling himself and putting his fingers on Hice’s face. Hice later dropped the lawsuit in 2022.

Trump Pardons Former Sailor Serving 20 Years After Biden ATF Prosecution

(Luis CornelioHeadline USA) President Donald Trump pardoned Friday Patrick “Tate” Adamiak, the former Navy sailor serving a 20-year federal prison sentence in a high-profile gun case that drew widespread condemnation from pro-Second Amendment organizations, activists and Republican lawmakers.

Adamiak, 32, of Virginia, was sentenced to 20 years in prison in 2023 after a federal jury convicted him of federal firearms offenses involving unregistered machine guns and so-called destructive devices. But the facts of the case were far more complicated than the government’s description suggested.

Adamiak’s family, alongside a coalition of pro-gun organizations, had advocated for his pardon since Trump took office in 2025.

“We haunted the halls of the White House, stopping everyone we could find who was willing to hear his story. We called on all of you to spread the word about the injustice this innocent Navy sailor faced,” the National Association of Gun Rights said in a statement.

Trump’s full and unconditional pardon frees Adamiak from the 16 years remaining in his sentence.

Adamiak’s case was triggered after the Biden-led ATF, through a controversial confidential informant, purchased gun parts and firearms from Adamiak. Adamiak’s defense attorneys and the pro-gun rights groups disputed the ATF’s assertions at trial.

The Second Amendment Foundation contended at the time that Adamiak never sold a single firearm. Instead, Adamiak’s hobby involved selling military memorabilia and lawful and dummy gun parts.

Federal prosecutors claimed that a PPSh-41 barrel shroud that Adamiak agreed to broker constituted a firearm.

The SAF said that the shroud never qualified as a firearm under federal regulations.

The informant also recalled seeing a grenade launcher and a machine gun in Adamiak’s possession despite Adamiak’s attorneys saying that the items were replicas and nonfunctional.

SAF noted that the ATF used these claims to apply for a search warrant.

“They manufactured crime to convict me,” Adamiak said in 2025, according to the Second Amendment Foundation.

During the trial, prosecutors claimed that Adamiak’s sentence should be increased because 1,012 items were seized. However, his defense argued that most of these items were flat pieces of sheet metal.

A page run by Adamiak’s family said he had no criminal history. Retired ATF agent Daniel G. O’Kelly also reportedly said that none of the items seized from Adamiak qualified as firearms.

The family noted that the ATF had failed to notify Adamiak that its new policy would criminalize the sale of the items. It also said that the items the ATF used to charge Adamiak remain available for sale on the firearms market.

Adamiak’s military service ended with a discharge with full honors after 10 years of active duty in the Navy.

Adamiak’s defenders raised more than $65,000 for his legal defense.

Headline USA has reached out to Adamiak’s family for comment on his plans now that he is free.

US Economy Added 162,000 Jobs in August

(Headline USAThe U.S. labor market bounced back in August as employers added a surprising 162,000 jobs, ending a summer of lackluster hiring with a bang.

The unemployment rate remained at a low 4.1%.

Hiring far exceeded the 65,000 jobs that forecasters had expected, according to a poll by FactSet. Labor Department revisions also looked good, adding 55,000 to June and July payrolls. Employers created 21,000 jobs in July; the Labor Department had originally reported that they’d cut 23,000.

Two months before the midterm elections, President Donald Trump welcomed the strong hiring report Friday. “Great jobs number just announced, breaking all estimates (except mine!) by double and triple – And you haven’t seen anything yet!” Trump wrote in a social media post.

But inflation has dominated conversations this year in business and households. Voters are increasingly frustrated by higher costs, particularly fuel prices that have hit record levels since the U.S. and Israel attacked Iran in late February.

And meager pay raises have made rising prices more painful for many. Average hourly wages rose 3.1% last month from a year earlier, the weakest year-over-year increase since May 2021.

Restaurants and bars added 59,000 jobs last month, construction companies 22,000 and manufacturers 16,000. Factory jobs are up by 58,000 since hitting a recent low in December, the Labor Department noted.

And the U.S. labor force — the number of people working or looking for work — jumped by 683,000 last month after falling in June and July.

Diane Swonk, chief economist at the tax and consulting firm KPMG, called the report “incredible. It’s a summer heatwave.’’ She noted that a broad measure of the unemployment rate – which includes people so discouraged they’ve given up looking for work and those working part time because they can’t find the full-time jobs they want – dropped to 7.7%, the lowest in more than a year.

So far this year, employers — companies, government agencies and nonprofits — have added an average of more than 80,000 jobs a month. That is up from a dismal monthly average of 9,700 last year.

Hiring has bounced around this year. From May through July, employers added a lackluster average of 38,000 jobs a month. Then came the burst of new jobs in August, which left some economists skeptical. “The rebound in hiring this month is encouraging,’’ wrote Thomas Simons, chief U.S. economist at the investment bank Jefferies, “but we suspect that it’s more of a payback from weakness over the prior three months rather than a sign of significant acceleration.’’

Friday’s report may increase the likelihood that the Federal Reserve will raise its key short-term interest rate when it next meets Sept. 15-16. Solid hiring sends a signal that current borrowing costs aren’t necessarily high enough to restrain the economy and cool inflation.

Fed Chair Kevin Warsh said last week that inflation, at 3.7% according to the Fed’s preferred measure, remains too far above the central bank’s 2% target and added that without further progress, the Fed would have “work to do.”

With hiring seemingly healthy, the Fed’s focus will shift to a critical inflation report due next week. On Thursday, Fed governor Christopher Waller said he is leaning toward keeping the Fed’s rate unchanged, but would support a hike if inflation comes in high.

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

Feds Open Probe into Musk’s Steering-Wheel-Free Taxis

(Headline USAFederal regulators are opening an investigation into whether Tesla’s new steering-wheel-free taxis comply with safety rules, a day after the company began offering rides in the vehicles.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration said it was looking into whether Tesla was in full compliance with federal rules when it deployed so-called Cybercabs in Austin, Texas, given that the two-seat cars lack the steering wheels, mirrors and brake pedals typically required in vehicles.

The head of the company, Elon Musk, kicked off the Cybercab service in Austin on Thursday with fanfare, sending dozens of the futuristic taxis onto city streets and holding a launch event for invitees.

Tesla stock fell nearly 6% to $354.08 on Friday, reversing all its gains from a day earlier amid excitement about the launch.

Tesla did not respond to a request for comment.

Before the launch, Tesla had said it relied on a self-certification process to ensure the Cybercabs complied with federal standards. But the agency is examining whether the taxis do indeed meet those standards. In its filing about the probe, it said it would conduct an audit to “examine the process and technical data” Tesla used in the certification.

Thursday’s launch of the Austin service kicked off what Musk says will be a national rollout of a cheap, driverless taxi service that he promises will transform the way people travel.

Musk plans to integrate Cybercabs, which lack manual controls that passengers could use to take over in an emergency, into the company’s existing cab service, which until now has used only conventional Tesla vehicles. That robotaxi network has been operating in Austin for more than a year and has also begun offering rides in five other cities in Texas and Florida.

Automakers generally self-certify when introducing new vehicles on public roads, but a regulatory audit or investigation is not automatic. Regulators investigate only certifications they believe might violate federal rules.

Unlike most new models, the Cybercab does not merely feature minor tweaks but significant changes that present new safety issues.

Rival taxi service Zoox faced a probe three years ago after self-certifying its own steering-wheel-free cabs. Regulators eventually granted approval, but only after conducting a formal review.

Tesla is facing several federal investigations into the safety of its self-driving software.

One probe is examining the software’s role in several Tesla crashes in fog, sun glare and other low-visibility conditions, including one in which a pedestrian was killed. Another is investigating dozens of incidents in which Teslas using partial self-driving software ran red lights or drove on the wrong side of the road, sometimes crashing into other vehicles and causing injuries. A third is examining why Tesla apparently violated regulatory requirements by failing to report crashes promptly.

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

Vance ‘Skeptical’ of Reports That US Bombed Wedding in Iran Despite Overwhelming Evidence

(Dave DeCamp, Antiwar.comVice President JD Vance said on Thursday that he was “extremely skeptical” of Iranian media reports that the US bombed a wedding in Iran on Tuesday, despite overwhelming evidence from other sources that the US was responsible.

“I’ve been briefed to the extent that I know that we’re investigating. I’ve seen the same public media reports everywhere else,” Vance said at a press briefing when asked about reports of the strike.

“I will say that the Iranian state media has not been a very good scribe about what’s happened in the conflict thus far. So I’m extremely skeptical of this,” he added.

The New York Times has verified the footage and photos of the aftermath of the strike, which hit a home in the southern Iranian city of Kuhestak, and concluded that the bomb had been fired by US forces.

Trevor Ball, a munitions expert, examined the photos and identified the remnants of a glide bomb that is used by US Central Command and is not used by Iran’s military. He told the Times that a tail fin and distinctive casing matched the US’s Joint Standoff Weapon, or JSOW.

The home that was bombed belongs to Ali Mallahi, a fisherman and member of Iran’s Baluch ethnic minority, who was celebrating his daughter’s wedding at the time of the strike.

Iranian officials initially said four people were killed, but Iranian media reported on Thursday that a 22-year-old woman died of wounds sustained in the attack, bringing the death toll up to five. The other four victims killed in the strikes on Kuhestan have been identified as four-year-old Amir Ali Karimi, 16-year-old Mohammad Malahi, 43-year-old Kolsoum Malahi, and 43-year-old Zarkhatoun Taheri.

The Balochistan Human Rights Documentation Network, a foreign-based group that maintains contacts with the Baloch community in Iran and is very critical of the Iranian government, also confirmed that the wedding was bombed but told The Associated Press that the 16-year-old boy, Mohammad Malahi, was killed in a separate strike that hit a communications tower about 100 meters away from the wedding.

Vance said that the US is “investigating” the incident because when “our military makes mistakes, they learn from them to try to get better from them.” But six months after the US strikes on the Shajareh Tayyebeh Elementary School in Minab, southern Iran, which killed more than 100 schoolchildren, the Trump administration still hasn’t acknowledged responsibility, and US attacks have repeatedly killed civilians in Iran.

Vance also said during the press briefing that his advice to the Iranians is to “stop acting like crazy people and shooting at commercial shipping,” and he also claimed that the six-month-old conflict was “not a war.”

This article originally appeared at Antiwar.com.

BREAKING: US Military Hits 3 Iranian Oil Tankers

(Headline USAU.S. forces struck three Iranian oil tankers after Navy warships were targeted with missiles, the American military said Saturday, warning that it would “if necessary, destroy Iran’s limited and exposed oil fleet.”

The strikes — a day after U.S. President Donald Trump sought to minimize the conflict as “small potatoes” — keep up a new tilt back toward fighting after six months of on-again, off-again war that began with U.S. and Israeli attacks on the country on Feb. 28. Both sides have sought to inflict both military and economic pain, and negotiations have collapsed.

The military’s statement said that an American aircraft carrier and a destroyer evaded “multiple unprovoked Iranian attacks” while patrolling in the region and no U.S. personnel were hurt. It said that two Iranian oil carriers were “permanently disabled” and the third, unladen one, was destroyed.

The U.S. statement said that the tankers were part of a shadow network helping to fund Iran’s powerful Revolutionary Guard and its armed proxies in the region.

There was no immediate Iranian response.

Iran had reported a strike near Kharg Island

Earlier, Iranian state television had said that four U.S. missiles struck a tanker about 6 miles from Kharg Island, home to a terminal through which the country exports most of its oil. Kharg Island has been repeatedly targeted during the war, including U.S. strikes on military sites there in March.

The U.S. said that one tanker was struck off Kharg Island and another was struck near Jask, east of the Strait of Hormuz. The unladen tanker was hit in the Gulf of Oman, and the U.S. said its crew had been “directed to abandon ship.” The statement shared what it called video footage of the strikes.

After the U.S. statement, Iran’s state broadcaster reported the two other tankers attacked, saying their crews had evacuated.

“We will not hesitate to defend American forces, and if necessary, destroy Iran’s limited and exposed oil fleet,” said Adm. Brad Cooper, the head of U.S. Central Command.

The strikes came nearly a week after the U.S. and Iran resumed attacks following a month of relative calm, with the Strait of Hormuz and Iranian communities along it again being targeted. At least five people were killed earlier in the week during a U.S. bombardment of southern Iran. One strike hit a wedding.

Masoumeh Zarei, 13, was wounded in the attack. She spoke to The Associated Press at a hospital while being treated for injuries to her abdomen.

She said that the wedding celebration had already begun when she set out to join it. She never made it there. She was knocked unconscious when a telecommunications tower was struck. Her next memory was of waking up in a hospital.

“The party had just started, and we wanted to go there,” Zarei said, her voice hoarse. “I had made my nails really pretty for the party, but everything changed.”

Her friend, 14-year-old Kiana Karimi, also was wounded and in intensive care. She told the AP that she heard five explosions.

“The first three explosions at the telecommunications tower threw us to the ground,” Karimi said. “I quickly got up to pick my brothers up off the ground. Then there were two more explosions, and after that I don’t remember anything.”

U.S. had tried to turn to economic pressure

The resumption of fighting in the past week came after new U.S. efforts to apply economic pressures on Tehran, whose hard-line new senior leaders have signaled the willingness to dig in after weathering decades of sanctions. The elected government of Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian, however, has said that it favors a negotiated end to the war.

Iran has found ways over the years to circumvent sanctions — and now a U.S. blockade of its ports — and get its oil to buyers to help ease growing economic pressures. That relies in part on a shadow fleet transporting its oil.

Meanwhile, the issue that helped lead to the war — Iran’s nuclear program — was meant to be addressed in negotiations that fell apart soon after the U.S. and Iran signed a memorandum of understanding in mid-June. Now diplomats say the U.S., Britain, France and Germany seek to refer Iran to the U.N. Security Council for failure to comply with its nuclear nonproliferation obligations.

Instead, Tehran’s new leverage focuses on the strait that is crucial to global oil and natural gas shipments and was seen as an international waterway before the war began.

The U.S. military has been helping to guide ships through the strait as Tehran asserts control and targets some vessels, but overall traffic remains low.

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press