Wednesday, June 3, 2026

Hidden NDAA Provision Would Fuse US-Israeli Militaries

(José Niño, Headline USA) Congress just proposed tying the United States military to Israel’s armed forces more closely than ever before, Responsible Statecraft reported.

Buried inside the House version of the 2027 National Defense Authorization Act released Tuesday is Section 224, titled “United States-Israel Defense Technology Cooperation Initiative.” Ben Freeman of Responsible Statecraft contends this provision would do more to merge the two militaries than the more than $200 billion in inflation adjusted military assistance Israel has received from America since 1948.

The section creates a framework for bilateral research and development, weapons co-production, joint ventures, licensing agreements, and virtually every type of military industrial cooperation conceivable. Although the two countries already partner extensively on missile defense, this provision would dramatically broaden coordination into AI, quantum computing, autonomous systems, directed energy, cyber, biotech, and numerous other fields. It additionally proposes “network integration” and “data fusion,” meaning US military data could soon become Israeli military data.

If fully enacted, this proposal would establish a higher level of military industrial integration than America maintains with any other nation on Earth. The United States works closely with NATO partners on co-production and shared supply chains through the Defence Production Action Plan, and as the world’s top arms dealer it supplies weapons globally. 

Section 224 constitutes something completely different. It would merge American and Israeli defense sectors across multiple domains critical to future warfare. It would also magnify Israeli influence beyond the existing Israel lobby and its network of paid social media influencers that Responsible Statecraft previously revealed. By expanding co-production facilities like those already operating in Mississippi and Arkansas, Israel could secure Congressional allies by delivering jobs in their districts.

The shift carries disturbing implications. As a recent Quincy Institute brief authored by Steven Simon explains, this move from aid to integration will “strip away the political and diplomatic oversight mechanisms that make the relationship publicly accountable, moving it from a visible annual aid vote into the opaque machinery of defense acquisition, where oversight is limited and political accountability is minimal.”

This development comes as Israel has repeatedly used US weapons in strikes that violated international humanitarian law in Gaza, per reports by Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, and PBS. A New York Times/Siena poll found just 30 percent believe Trump made “the right decision” to go to war with Iran. An Institute for Global Affairs poll found only 16 percent back unconditional weapons supplies to Israel, while 38 percent want to halt weapons entirely.

Senator Chris Van Hollen wrote in the New York Times that “The Democratic Party has provided reflexive and unconditional support to Israeli governments, even as their actions have increasingly undermined American interests and values.”

José Niño is the deputy editor of Headline USA. Follow him at x.com/JoseAlNino 

Store Owner Found Not Guilty of Murdering Gun-Wielding Teen

(Headline USAA South Carolina jury on Monday found a store owner not guilty of murder in the 2023 shooting of a Black 14-year-old, who allegedly threatened the owner’s son with a firearm.

The jury returned the verdict for Chikei Rick Chow. Chow, 61, who is Asian, shot Cyrus Carmack-Belton in the back after chasing him from his convenience store in Columbia. He maintained he acted to defend his son.

After the verdict was read, sobs and cries of distress could be heard coming from Carmack-Belton’s family seated in the gallery. Chow sat silently frozen before slowly bowing his head onto his interlocked hands.

Defense lawyer Jack Swerling said they’re very pleased with the verdict but also feel for Carmack-Belton’s family.

“My heart goes out to them, but 14-year-old kid should not be roaming the streets of Columbia or South Carolina with semiautomatic pistol loaded and ready to fire,” he said.

Todd Rutherford, an attorney and representative in the South Carolina Legislature, stood next to Carmack-Belton’s father as he told reporters that they don’t agree with the verdict.

Rutherford announced they will pursue a civil lawsuit.

Prosecutors and a defense lawyer in closing arguments painted different pictures of the 2023 shooting. Prosecutors said Chow acted in anger because he wrongly thought the teen had stolen four bottles of water from the store. A defense lawyer said Chow fired to defend his son only after the teen pointed a gun at him.

“This case is not about a shoplifter. This case is about a father who sees a gun pointed at his son and had to make a decision,” defense attorney Shaun Kent told jurors during closing arguments, noting that Andy Chow testified Carmack-Belton pointed a gun at him.

Prosecutors acknowledged Carmack-Belton had a semiautomatic pistol, but they say it fell on the ground during the chase, and he never threatened anyone with it. Prosecutors said Chow chased the teen more than 130 yards from the store.

Gipson told jurors that Chow “chased a kid down, shot him in the back.”

During closing arguments, Gipson placed a bottle of water before jurors. Gipson said Chow “at the end of the day, believed that a human is not more than that.”

Gipson said multiple witnesses testified that they didn’t see anything in Carmack-Belton’s hands and didn’t see him point a gun as he ran from the store.

“Nobody testified that happened that doesn’t have the last name Chow,” Gipson said.

The fatal shooting prompted vigils and protests outside the store. Empty water bottles were arranged to spell out “Cyrus” at one 2023 vigil.

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

Ex-Rep. George Santos Under DOJ Investigation Yet Again

(Headline USAA prediction market reported former U.S. Rep. George Santos to federal prosecutors after he boasted he’d be going to President Donald Trump’s State of the Union address, then bet against his own attendance, according to the Associated Press.

Kalshi, the online prediction marketplace, referred Santos to the Department of Justice after detecting suspicious trades made by him ahead of Trump’s Feb. 24 speech, the person said. The person spoke to The Associated Press on the condition of anonymity because they weren’t authorized to discuss the matter publicly.

Kalshi also reported the trades to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, a federal regulatory body that has vowed to crack down on insider trading in prediction marketplaces.

The Justice Department and the CFTC didn’t immediately respond Tuesday to inquiries from the AP.

Santos also did not respond to text messages or phone calls.

The referral was first reported by NPR. Santos told NPR that he wasn’t aware of the investigation. He declined to say whether he had a Kalshi account.

“I’m not saying yes, I’m not saying no,” Santos told NPR.

The convicted ex-congressman had repeatedly discussed his intention to attend the State of the Union, which came just four months after he was granted clemency by Trump in a fraud case that led to his expulsion from the U.S. House.

On the eve of Trump’s speech, Kalshi put the odds of Santos attending at close to 75%.

Then, minutes into the speech, Santos posted on X that he had been waylaid at the airport. Immediately, several social media users accused him of running another scheme.

“Santos talking to his accountant and telling him to open his Kalshi account and bet all his money on No,” one user wrote, alongside a meme of Al Pacino counting money in the movie Scarface.

In March, Santos addressed the complaints on his podcast.

“I guess people lost money,” he said. “Some people made unexpected money. That’s to show you how fragile these markets are.”

Santos, who won office as a Republican after inventing a bogus persona as a Wall Street dealmaker, was sentenced to seven years in prison after pleading guilty to fraud and identity theft in 2024.

After serving just 84 days, he was ordered released by Trump, who called Santos a “rogue” but said he didn’t deserve a harsh sentence and should get credit for voting Republican.

Prediction markets, including Kalshi and its chief rival Polymarket, have drawn scrutiny as their businesses have expanded — with some lawmakers urging the platforms to do more to guard against insider trading.

Both companies have said they are reporting suspicious trades to federal regulators. Some investigations have led to criminal charges. In April a soldier involved in the military operation to capture Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro was charged with using classified information to win more than $400,000 predicting the date of his capture on Polymarket.

In April, the Senate approved a bipartisan resolution to prevent its own members from using prediction markets.

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

House To Vote This Week on Bill To End Support for Israel’s War on Lebanon

(Dave DeCamp, Antiwar.com) The House is expected to vote this week on a War Powers Resolution to end US support for Israel’s war in Lebanon, which has been a major impediment to ending the US-Israeli war against Iran.

The bill, introduced by Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-MI), would end any US participation in the war that hasn’t been authorized by Congress, which would apply to US intelligence sharing and other coordination regarding Israel’s occupation of southern Lebanon and its attacks across the country.

According to Just Foreign Policy, a memo from Tlaib’s office said that the Trump administration is violating the 1973 War Powers Act by personally approving and rejecting specific Israeli military operations in Lebanon, and US forces have been sharing intelligence used in military attacks and coordinating with the Israeli military throughout their war effort.

Americans can click here to tell their House representatives to support the bill to end US involvement in the war, which has killed more than 3,400 Lebanese, including many civilians, since early March. The vote could happen on Thursday, but that is not confirmed and is subject to change.

“Over 3,000 killed. This mass murder must end. The US is not a bystander in the Israeli military’s brutal invasion of Lebanon — it is an active participant,” Tlaib wrote on X on May 22. “I will force a vote in Congress to immediately end all US participation in this illegal and immoral war on Lebanon.”

The House will also vote this week on a War Powers Resolution to bring an end to President Donald Trump’s war with Iran as the US and Iran continue to exchange fire, and the US is enforcing a blockade despite a nominal ceasefire that is supposed to be in place. House Republicans blocked a vote on the Iran measure before Congress went on its Memorial Day recess, when it became clear they didn’t have enough votes to stop it from passing.

This article originally appeared at Antiwar.com.  

Acting AG Blanche Confirms Weaponization Fund Is Canceled

(Luis CornelioHeadline USA) The proposed $1.776 billion Anti-Weaponization Fund is no more.

Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche confirmed in remarks to the House Appropriations Committee on Tuesday that the Department of Justice is walking away from the initiative.

“We are not moving forward with the fund, period,” Blanche told lawmakers in a tense hearing, later adding: “The reasons for the fund, I think, remain as important as they were before, but we are not moving forward with the fund.”

Blanche said the fund was a priority for President Donald Trump, who was himself indicted by the Biden administration shortly after leaving the White House in 2021.

Blanche’s remarks mark the latest sign that the DOJ has abandoned the effort entirely.

The fund was first announced in a May 18 press release after Trump settled a civil lawsuit against the IRS over the agency’s failure to prevent the leak of his confidential tax-return information to the legacy media.

His comments also followed two federal court rulings tied to the settlement.

First, U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema, a Clinton appointee, on May 29 issued a temporary restraining order blocking the fund after a lawsuit filed by a former federal prosecutor who claimed he was fired for his role in the aggressive targeting of Jan. 6 defendants.

Separately, U.S. District Judge Kathleen M. Williams of Florida also on May 29 revived Trump’s case against the IRS after a group of former judges urged her to do so in an amicus brief.

Williams ordered the DOJ and Trump’s attorneys to respond by June 12 to questions about the settlement, which was entered outside her court.

At the center of the revived case is the claim that Trump and the DOJ may have misled the court, though no evidence has been produced to support that allegation.

Federal Workers Use Bed Bugs to Demand Biden-era Telework

(Luis CornelioHeadline USA) The Trump-led Department of Agriculture is battling a bed bug infestation that officials say may have been caused by employees’ negligence, with the same workers now demanding the right to stay home while collecting taxpayer-funded salaries.

The infestation, first reported Tuesday by NOTUS, appears to have affected the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, which is based at the George Washington Carver Center in Beltsville, Maryland.

A USDA spokesperson said the infestation persisted even after fumigation services were ordered because infested personal items were left behind by employees, even after they were initially allowed to work from home.

“USDA took prompt and robust action several weeks ago,” the spokesperson said, according to NOTUS. “Unfortunately, personal belongings left in the offices caused further issue. Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service management is working with employees to ensure the spaces are emptied for proper mitigation.”

Five employees, none of whom agreed to speak on the record and instead spoke anonymously, said they were notified of the bed bug issue in mid-May. APHIS temporarily allowed employees to work from home while the building underwent treatment.

The problem persisted despite those efforts, prompting some employees to complain of purported “noxious fumes” and “resulting sickness.” The federal agency renewed telework accommodations in response.

However, new bed bugs were observed in certain parts of the building on Friday. This time, employees were told to use their vacation time if they did not wish to report to the office.

“They treated the building, and then they sent people home again because of offgassing. Then they came back. Now there’s more bedbugs,” an anonymous employee told NOTUS.

Another unnamed employee claimed they had “returned to an office that was making them sick because the chemicals hadn’t aired out.”

The complaints come after Donald Trump issued an executive memorandum ending the Biden administration’s expansive telework policies, which had allowed thousands of employees to work remotely with little supervision for extended periods while taxpayers continued funding federal office space.

’60 Minutes’ Correspondent: CBS News Head Bari Weiss is ‘Murdering’ the Show

(Headline USA)  In a remarkable sign of the turmoil at CBS’s top-rated “60 Minutes,” correspondent Scott Pelley said CBS News head Bari Weiss was “murdering the show” and accused its new producer of having “slender qualifications” for the job, according to reports.

Pelley made his accusations in an introductory meeting Monday between the newsmagazine’s staff and Nick Bilton, the new executive producer named by Weiss last week, according to a detailed report on the Status website, which said it had heard a recording of the meeting. Weiss herself was not present, according to the report. Status specializes in media news and analysis.

Status reported that Pelley, the longtime “60 Minutes” correspondent, began grilling Bilton at the 10 a.m. meeting about the firings last week of Bilton’s predecessor, Tanya Simon, and correspondents Sharyn Alfonsi and Cecilia Vega. Status also reported that Pelley told Bilton, a former technology journalist and filmmaker with no traditional broadcast news experience, that his qualifications for the position were “slender.”

Pelley also charged, according to Status, that Weiss herself had “no qualifications for her job,” and said the changes she had made to “CBS Evening News,” which Pelley once anchored, “have been catastrophic.”

It added that Bilton insisted that “Bari loves this institution” and “she loves ’60 Minutes'” — to which Pelley countered, “She’s murdering ‘60 minutes.’ She does not love this place. She was brought in to kill it and she’s doing exactly that.”

Two spokespeople for CBS News did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

But a person close to CBS News leadership, speaking on condition of anonymity, told The Associated Press that both Weiss and Bilton had tried to reach out to Pelley late last week when the changes rocked the 57-year-old show to tell him that he was an integral part of “60 Minutes” and wanted him to remain so.

The person said Weiss and Bilton felt it was disappointing that Pelley’s accusations were being aired publicly despite efforts to engage with him privately.

The New York Times, which also reported that it had listened to a recording of Monday’s meeting, noted that Pelley’s “newscaster’s baritone” was shaking during the exchange. The newspaper also quoted an unnamed executive at the meeting as saying Weiss had been prepared to come, but “we asked her not to.”

Reports about the contentious meeting came four days after Weiss, who has become a polarizing figure in the media world since taking the reins at CBS last October, told staff in a memo that it was time for a “new approach” at the top-rated newsmagazine.

In the memo, Weiss and CBS News president Tom Cibrowski said their goal was “building a show that thrives in the 21st century.”

“That requires a new approach,” they wrote, defining that approach as “expanding ‘60 Minutes’ beyond a one-hour television broadcast, deepening its role across CBS News, and holding everything we produce to the ambition, fairness, and fearlessness that have defined ‘60 Minutes’ at its best.”

Bilton, they said, “embodies the energy and ambition that animated the founders of the show. We cannot imagine a better fit.”

The Status report noted that Pelley was applauded multiple times by other staffers during the meeting. It said Pelley focused on the firings last week, calling them cruel.

Bilton reportedly replied that he was not intimidated. “I have been a journalist for 25 years, Scott,” Status quoted him as saying. “I have sat and talked with incredibly powerful people like you have. None of it intimidates me, OK? So you are not going to intimidate me in front of this group of people.”

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

Gov. Walz Appoints Members to Operation Metro Surge ‘Truth Council’

(Elyse S. Apel, The Center Square) Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz has appointed members to a new council tasked with documenting the impacts of Operation Metro Surge and Operation PARRIS, two federal immigration enforcement operations that sparked controversy, litigation and criminal investigations that remain ongoing.

Walz, a Democrat, announced the appointments  to the Governor’s Council on Recording the Truth of Operation Metro Surge and Operation PARRIS on Minnesotans, also referred to as the Minnesota Truth Council.

The council will be chaired by former Hennepin County District Court Judge Peter Cahill, who presided over the 2021 murder trial of former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin following the death of George Floyd.

“Documenting history requires trusted leaders who are committed to listening, preserving people’s experiences, and ensuring that Minnesota’s story is not forgotten,” Walz said. “These council members bring deep expertise, lived experience, and a shared commitment to the truth. Their work will help create a lasting public record of both the harm endured and the resilience Minnesotans demonstrated during this difficult chapter in our state’s history.”

Members include representatives from education, civil rights, business, health care, law enforcement and community organizations across Minnesota.

The council was created through Executive Order 26-05, signed by Walz in March. That order directed the group to gather testimony, data and firsthand accounts related to Operation Metro Surge and Operation PARRIS and develop recommendations aimed at preventing similar events in the future.

The order described Operation Metro Surge, launched by the Department of Homeland Security in December 2025, as the largest immigration enforcement action in agency history. Operation PARRIS followed in January 2026 and focused on refugee communities in Minnesota.

“Over a period of more than 10 weeks, masked and armed immigration agents detained children, indiscriminately used chemical agents, violated the civil rights of peaceful protestors, detained American Indians, and conducted unwarranted stops and arrests of our neighbors simply because of the color of their skin,” the order said.

The council will work alongside The Advocates for Human Rights, which has been contracted to collect stories and testimony from people affected by the operations. The American Civil Liberties Union of Minnesota and The Advocates for Human Rights each appointed one member to serve on the council.

The council will issue preliminary findings by Oct. 31 and submit a final report by Dec. 1 to the governor, legislative leaders and Minnesota’s congressional delegation. The council plans to collect information through public forums, testimony, video evidence and other records. At least four public meetings will be held before the final report is issued.

This effort comes as legal and political controversy surrounding Operation Metro Surge is ongoing.

Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison, along with the cities of Minneapolis and Saint Paul, is pursuing a federal lawsuit seeking to have the operation declared unconstitutional and unlawful. State officials have argued the enforcement surge caused extensive economic damage, citing estimates of more than $240 million in lost wages and over $600 million in business losses.

At the same time, state prosecutors have filed criminal charges against two federal immigration agents tied to incidents that occurred during the operation. Hennepin County Attorney Mary Moriarty has said additional investigations remain ongoing.

Federal officials have disputed Minnesota Democrats’ characterization of the operation.

An Immigration and Customs Enforcement spokesperson previously told The Center Square that state prosecutions of federal agents are “unlawful” and a “political stunt.” Federal officials have also defended the larger operation, saying agents apprehended more than 4,000 individuals, including violent offenders and gang members, as part of Operation Metro Surge.

The Advocates for Human Rights’ website describes the council as an “independent, non-partisan” effort to create a historical record of both alleged human rights violations and the community response that followed.

The council has no law enforcement authority and cannot prosecute individuals or award compensation. Instead, its final report is intended to document the impacts of the operations and recommend potential policy and legislative reforms.

“The only way we move forward is with accountability,” Walz said in the executive order. “Minnesotans demand and deserve a public record that reflects the violent, cruel, inhumane, and deeply disturbing actions of federal immigration agents, and the dignity of our response. This record can help serve as a step towards our state’s long-term recovery.”

U.S. Reps. Dean and Evans Ask Regulators for Answers on Data Centers

(John Cole, The Center Square)  As the debate around data centers continues in Pennsylvania, a pair of lawmakers have penned a letter pushing for answers and transparency at the federal level.

Last week, U.S. Reps. Madeleine Dean, D-4th District, and Dwight Evans, D-3rd District, sent a letter to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, or FERC, asking how the agency is overseeing increased power demand from data centers.

FERC’s mission, according to the agency’s website, is to assist consumers in “obtaining reliable, safe, secure, and economically efficient energy services at a reasonable cost through appropriate regulatory and market means, and collaborative efforts.”

Dean and Evans pinpointed the reliability of the electrical grid and the costs that may be passed on to home consumers in their request.

“There is an increasing presence of data centers, and questions of how, when, and where they will connect to the grid,” Dean and Evans write. “Our concerns about the future of data centers and their energy demand impacting interstate transmission capacity not only include realistic assessments of load interconnection projects that will be added to the grid but also fluctuating load cycles destabilizing the grid.”

“This is in addition to concerns about the environmental impact, including air quality and water consumption, community input, long-term planning, and the inclusion of distributed energy resources (DERs) in any future buildout,” they continued.

In this letter, Dean and Evans also cite a recent alert from The North American Electric Reliability Corporation, or NERC, an organization that analyzes the reliability of power grids throughout the United States and Canada.

This NERC alert highlighted concerns about reliability arising from new computational loads, including data centers, interacting with the bulk power system, while highlighting “7 advisory actions that transmission planners, owners, coordinators, and operators should consider, and encourages their adoption to support reliability standards and address emerging challenges.”

As Dean and Evans seek answers at the federal level, the discussion has also emerged among lawmakers in the Pennsylvania General Assembly.

On May 4, the state House unanimously passed House Bill 2223, authored by Rep. Elizabeth Fiedler, which would require electric utilities to evaluate and consider the use of advanced transmission technologies, or ATTs, on new and existing service lines within their transmission siting applications filed with the state regulatory commission, which are currently required by law for all newly proposed transmission facilities.

A week prior to that vote, Gov. Josh Shapiro sent a letter to utility companies laying out his administration’s criteria they will consider justifiable in future rate-making cases.

And last week, Shapiro announced voluntary standards that data center developers will have to meet to receive state government support. Republican leadership in the Senate signaled broad agreement with the governor’s pitch.

Rank and file members on both sides of the aisle, however, have suggested to repeal a 2021 sales tax exemption for data center developers, while others want to pause consideration of new proposals for as long as three years.

The letter from Dean and Evans to FERC also requested information on the Trump administration’s decision to cancel clean-energy projects, believing this could “impact transmission planning and delivering electricity to consumers due to changes in energy supply.”

A statewide tracker for data center proposals noted that 68 sites have either been proposed or are under construction. An additional 72 data centers are active, according to the map.

Evans and Dean requested responses by June 30.

HUD Shifts $4B Homelessness Program from ‘Housing First’ to Treatment

(Tim Clouser, The Center Square) The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development announced a $4 billion funding opportunity for homelessness services on Monday, shifting away from the Housing First model.​

The notice of funding opportunity, or NOFO, for HUD’s Continuum of Care program, represents a major turning point in federal funding for homelessness services. The overhaul prioritizes funding for services focused on treatment and recovery over broad renewals of Tier 1 projects, such as permanent housing. ​

The courts blocked a NOFO last year that would’ve dropped the funding cap for Tier 1 renewal projects from about 90% to 30% midway through the existing grant cycle.

The new NOFO includes a 60% cap on those projects, offering CoCs a compromise, while also directing funds toward transitional housing.

“The ‘housing first’ experiment failed Americans by warehousing the vulnerable without results,” HUD Secretary Scott Turner wrote in a press release Monday when announcing the shift in federal priorities.

Housing First prioritizes taxpayer-subsidized permanent housing for homeless individuals without any preconditions such as sobriety, participation in addiction treatment or employment.

Supporters argue that it’s supposed to be paired with support services, such as treatment, but participation is voluntary.

Critics say Housing First results in a revolving door, subsidized by everyday citizens with their taxes.

Dr. Sam Tsemberis developed Housing First in the 1990s, and HUD has used the model for 15 years.​

“This ideology promised to end homelessness. Instead, billions of taxpayer dollars were spent while homelessness increased to record levels,” Turner wrote, referencing federal data from January 2024.​

While recent data shows a 3.4% decline in estimated homelessness nationwide from 2024 to 2025, HUD’s annual point-in-time count in January 2025 still represents about a 27% increase from 2013.

Taxpayer-subsidized beds also increased 151% from 2013 to 2025, according to HUD’s press release.

In an interview last year, Tsemberis said the fentanyl crisis facing the nation today is different than the crack epidemic in the 1990s; however, he told The Center Square that the solution for homelessness is housing and argued that abandoning Housing First will result in more people ending up on the streets.​

“What I’m very concerned about is that they want to move everything back to where people need to be in treatment and be sober before they get housing,” Tsemberis told The Center Square last fall in an interview about his model. “It’s going to increase homelessness, and it doesn’t make sense to me.”

The Trump administration is ready to move on from Housing First ​and tie funding to a provider’s results.

Since 2007, permanent supportive housing has increased by 111% nationwide, rising to 188% when rapid rehousing projects are included; meanwhile, HUD says transitional housing has fallen nearly 60%.

In 2024, 88% of CoC funding went toward permanent housing, while 1% went to transitional housing.​

HUD says the new NOFO is intended to address the “root causes of homelessness” and ties funding to performance to ensure the federal spending moves the needle rather than maintaining the status quo.

The federal government says it will direct $1.3 billion from the NOFO toward investing in new projects.​

According to the NOFO, applicants can set themselves apart when competing for funding by requiring homeless individuals to engage in support services to receive housing, partnering with mental health and treatment providers and employment programs, and coordinating outreach with law enforcement.

Quickly clearing encampments on public property and reducing public drug use also earn them points.​

The NOFO requires funding applicants to certify that they will not operate drug-injection sites, or “safe consumption sites,” distribute drug paraphernalia, known as harm reduction, or permit illicit drug use.

The provision explicitly states that it’s not intended to require sobriety to receive housing. Still, another guideline in the NOFO does award points to applicants competing for funding who do require sobriety.

“Housing alone will not solve a crisis driven by addiction and mental illness. Under President Donald Trump’s leadership, HUD is making necessary reforms to put recovery first,” Turner wrote in Monday’s release.