Is Selling Gold Right Now a Mistake?

(Mike Maharrey, Money Metals News Service) Producer prices came in hotter than expected in November. This came on the heels of a CPI report showing price inflation is sticky.

With inflation worries mounting, investors sold gold.

Wait.

People sold an inflation hedge with increasing signs of inflation?

Yes. You read that correctly.

We’ve returned to a market dynamic that dominated 2023. Investors worried about sticky inflation are dumping gold, an asset that has traditionally served as a hedge against price inflation.

Is that a mistake?

I think it is, and I’ll explain why.

The reason people keep dumping gold is simple. Mainstream investors think the Federal Reserve might cut interest rates more slowly than anticipated. Since gold is a non-yielding asset and tends to face headwinds in a higher interest rate environment, they are spurning the yellow metal.

On the surface, this strategy makes sense, at least as a short-term play. But these mainstream investors are missing the bigger picture – specifically two important factors.

  1. Inflation isn’t likely going anywhere anytime soon.
  2. The Fed is going to keep cutting.

The Inflation Problem

Producer prices rose 3 percent on an annual basis in November. That was up from a 2.4 percent increase in October, and it was the highest year-on-year increase since February 2023.

On a monthly basis, PPI was up 0.4 percent, compared to 0.2 percent in October.

Surging producer prices are particularly worrisome because they are generally leading indicators for consumer price inflation.

PPI calculates the prices producers pay for their production inputs. At least some of these price increases will pass along to consumers in the future, driving CPI higher.

And the CPI data is already worrisome. Core CPI, stripping out more volatile energy and food prices, has been mired around 3 percent for months.

Some people might find this surprising given the Fed’s aggressive interest rate increases and balance sheet reduction. But as I’ve pointed out over and over, the Fed’s inflation fight was wimpy compared to the inflation creation during the COVID era. On top of that, the Fed never unwound the inflation it created in the decade following the 2008 financial crisis. The Fed didn’t do enough to address inflation, to begin with, and then it surrendered to inflation last summer when it announced plans to slow balance sheet reduction.

Simply put, raising rates to 5.5 percent coupled with a modest decrease in the balance sheet was never going to unwind the inflationary impact of nearly $9 trillion in money creation and well over a decade of artificially low interest rates. Remember that Paul Volker had to jack rates up to 20 percent to slay the inflation dragon of the 1970s. Powell and Company essentially shot some BBs at inflation and called it a day.

That’s why I’m convinced that inflation isn’t going anywhere. They did just enough to create an illusion of victory, but the inflation monster is still hiding under the bed.

The Fed Will Keep Cutting Interest Rates

Even with price inflation well above the 2 percent target, the Fed is loosening monetary policy. It started with a super-sized rate cut in September and then trimmed another 25 basis points in November. Virtually everybody expects the central bank to cut again at the December meeting.

We’re already seeing the effects. The money supply began increasing earlier this year. That signals the central bank is once again inflating.

So, why is the Fed easing monetary policy when it’s clear price inflation is alive and well?

Because while they will never say so out loud, the central bankers at the Fed know that this debt-riddled bubble economy can’t function in a higher interest rate environment. The economy is addicted to easy money (inflation), and the pusher is giving the addict more drugs to keep it from going into withdrawal.

Just consider the national debt. It eclipsed $36 trillion last month. The interest expense during fiscal 2024 was over $1 trillion. This is just one example of how higher interest rates are putting a stranglehold on the economy.

The federal government isn’t the only one struggling with debt. Corporate debt is at record levels. Consumer debt is at record levels. Everybody is levered to the hilt.

This economy is built on debt, and the foundation will crumble if interest rates remain even modestly high.

So, the Federal Reserve is walking a tightrope. It’s trying to keep inflation under control without causing a major economic crisis.

Odds are this balancing act will end in disaster.

When the economy visibly cracks, the Fed will be forced to get even more aggressive in loosening monetary policy. If history is any indication, it will cut rates to zero again, and it will launch quantitative easing (QE).

You think inflation is bad now? Just wait until the central bank revs up the money printing press again.

In my view, the most likely scenario is stagflation – a crashing economy in the midst of rapidly rising prices.

A lot of people believe everything is fine. After all, the Fed started raising interest rates over a year ago, and nothing bad has happened. And now the central bank is cutting rates. According to most mainstream analysts, we’re gliding to a soft landing.

But don’t forget that the Fed was cutting rates in 2007. Everybody swore everything was fine.

And then it wasn’t.

I’ve been saying for months that this looks a lot like 2007 2.0. Now, some people in the mainstream are starting to pick up on the similarities. Golden Coast Consultants chief market strategist Gregory Crennon recently noted that in December 2007, “the stock market was near or at its highs as the economy was still growing, the Fed decided to cut rates by a 1/4 % to 4.25% while stating inflation was still a concern.”

As the saying goes, things tend to happen slowly and then all at once.

The bottom line is savvy investors might want to think twice about dumping their gold along with the masses. In fact, you might want to consider these dips as buying opportunities.

Trump Plugs Former Employer, Roasts Ex-Rival in AI-Generated S**tpost about Drones

(Ben Sellers, Headline USA) President-elect Donald Trump weighed in Saturday on the growing concern about drones flying over parts of the mid-Atlantic, including New Jersey and Pennsylvania. 

While Trump had earlier issued a statement calling for the drones to be shot down if unidentifiable, he introduced a little levity into the discussion by speculating on what their true purpose might be, using an AI-generated meme that offered a nod to his ex-employer and a jab at one of his most obnoxious intra-party critics.

The Saturday-afternoon post on social media suggested, without comment, that the legion of drones may be transporting bags of Big Macs from McDonald’s to former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie.

Shortly after winning reelection, Trump formally resigned from his position as a McDonald’s fry cook and window cashier, according to a letter posted online by his son Donald Trump Jr.

“I am committed to ensuring a smooth transition during my remaining time here,” said the letter. “Please let me know how I can assist in finding and training my replacement, or in any other capacity to help maintain the high standards of service at our location.

The resignation takes effect on Jan. 20 of next year, which is Inauguration Day.

Christie—whose failed GOP primary campaign barely made a ripple in the Trump juggernaut—may have received a loud and clear message from the recent post that he is now persona non grata in the Trump transition, which he oversaw in 2016 and was subsequently accused of stacking Trump’s administration with a litany of disloyal RINOs.

Among those close to Christie was FBI Director Christopher Wray, who had previously represented the New Jersey governor in his “Bridgegate” scandal, involving politically motivated lane closures on the George Washington Bridge to New York City in 2013.

Wray last week announced his plan to resign after having been the ringleader in multiple lawfare campaigns against Trump, including a controversial FBI raid of Mar-a-Lago where he authorized agents to use deadly force if necessary.

An inspector-general’s report also recently revealed that Wray had long been covering up the fact that there were more than two dozen confidential human sources working with the FBI who infiltrated pro-Trump groups and, in many cases, entered the U.S. Capitol alongside other demonstrators on Jan. 6, 2021.

Christie meanwhile, putting his own ambitions above the interests of his professed party, went on the attack against Trump in 2020 and 2024, becoming one of the go-to “Republican” critics for left-leaning media outlets.

He injected himself into the drone discussion on Sunday while speaking with another recently vanquished Trump angagonist, ABC News host George Stephanopoulos—a day after the network was fined $15 million over a defamatory claim Stephanopoulos made that Trump had committed “rape” against serial accuser E. Jean Carroll.

Christie slammed Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, the Federal Aviation Administration and other in the Biden administration for their lack of response and communication on the matter, according to Newsweek.

And he warned that it would likely lead to citizens taking matters into their own hands.

“[W]hat we’re going to find George, is you’re going to have individuals acting as drone vigilantes, and they’re going to start taking them down,” Christie said.

“That’s not what we want because they’re now an important part of commerce, and law-enforcement uses them frequently for surveillance and other things,” he continued. “We need to be able to operate in a safe way and we’re not doing that.”

Meanwhile, many social-media influencers celebrated Trump’s takedown of Christie, welcoming the return of “mean tweets” that, while sometimes equally vicious during the Biden era, lacked the same sardonic wit as the Trump ones.

Earlier in December, Trump got Canadian relations off to a bumpy start when he roiled dictatorial Prime Minister Justin Trudeau by jokingly threatening to annex the northern nation.

That fueled a histrionic rant from the Castro-like Canadian leader, whose country goes to the polls next October in what some suspect could be a northern version of the MAGA revolution that transpired in the U.S. this November.

Trudeau has gone on the offensive against Trump’s threat of tarriffs, saying Canada would respond by cutting electricity exports across the border and ending its import of alcoholic spirits.

He also scolded Americans for allowing Trump, once again, to beat a woman candidate, while declaring himself to be a “feminist.”

Ben Sellers is the editor of Headline USA. Follow him at x.com/realbensellers.

Nazi Street Fighter out of Jail after 6-Year Legal Saga

(Ken Silva, Headline USA) White nationalist Robert Rundo was sentenced to time served Friday after reaching a plea deal to settle six-year-old allegations that he started several fights at political rallies in 2018, and plotted to do the same at the 2017 Charlottesville Untie the Right event—even though he wasn’t there.

Rundo’s sentencing came after a six-year legal saga that saw a U.S. judge toss his case—twice. But each time, an appeals court reinstated the charges, and he finally pled guilty once and for all in September.

Rundo, Robert Boman and Tyler Laube—all members of the white nationalist Rise Above Movement, or RAM—were first charged with planning and engaging in riots at political rallies in 2018. A federal district court dismissed the charges in 2019, finding that the federal Anti-Riot Act violated the First Amendment. However, the Ninth Circuit Appeals Court reversed the decision in 2021 and the charges were reinstated.

Rundo, the lead defendant, left the country and had to be extradited from Romania in August 2023. But in February, U.S. District Judge Cormac Carney again dismissed the case against him and Boman on the grounds that the DOJ was targeting right-wing activists while ignoring groups such as Antifa.

“The government uses the Anti-Riot Act, a once-rarely-used criminal statute, to prosecute members of the Rise Above Movement (“RAM”), a group of far-right, white supremacist nationalists, who attended several rallies and protests during which they engaged in violent acts,” Judge Carney said in his decision.

“At the same time, the government chose not to prosecute far-left extremist groups, such as Antifa, that went to the same protests and rallies and engaged in the same violent acts as alleged against the Defendants in this case, Robert Rundo and Robert Boman,” the judge added.

This time, Rundo stayed in the country. It may have been a good thing that he did. When Ninth Circuit appeals court overturned that decision later in the year, and Rundo was sent back to jail again.

The DOJ sought two more years of prison for Rundo in its Dec. 10 sentencing memorandum, but Judge Josephine L. Staton sided with the defense and gave him time served. Rundo was also sentenced to two years of supervised release.

Meanwhile, Rundo’s co-defendant, Boman, is still set to take his case to trial in February.

Ken Silva is a staff writer at Headline USA. Follow him at x.com/jd_cashless.

Report: Alleged Insurance CEO Killer’s Mother Called FBI Night before His Arrest

(Ken Silva, Headline USA) The mother of Luigi Mangione spoke with the FBI the night before he was arrested for allegedly murdering UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson, according to a report from the New York Post.

Citing unnamed law enforcement sources, the Post reported Friday that the mother told the feds her son bore a resemblance to the suspect wanted for killing Thompson. But the mother, who reported to law enforcement on Nov. 19 that her son was missing since July, wasn’t convinced it was him.

“Members of the Joint Violent Crimes Task Force questioned Kathleen Mangione late Sunday night after receiving a tip from San Francisco police—four days prior—about a missing person’s report the family had filed with the department in November,” the Post reported.

“Police tipped off the feds after they recognized the 26-year-old’s face in surveillance images put out by the NYPD after Thompson, 50, was gunned down last week—but his mother wasn’t completely confident that was actually her son in the images.”

Mangione reportedly vanished for months before his arrest, and he told loved ones he was going on a trip to Asia.

Mangione was arrested Monday after a customer at a McDonald’s in Altoona, Pennsylvania, saw him eating breakfast and noticed a resemblance to the person being sought by police in the Dec. 4 killing of Brian Thompson in Manhattan.

Police say Mangione was found with a gun, mask and writings linking him to the ambush outside the New York Hilton Midtown, where Thompson was arriving for his company’s annual investor conference.

Mangione, 26, remained jailed without bail Saturday in Pennsylvania, where he was initially charged with gun and forgery offenses. Altoona is about 230 miles west of New York City.

Karen Friedman Agnifilo, who was a high-ranking deputy in the Manhattan district attorney’s office for years before entering private practice, confirmed Friday that she’ll be representing Mangione.

Her husband and law partner Mark Agnifilo is representing Sean “Diddy” Combs in the hip-hop mogul’s Manhattan federal sex trafficking case.

Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg also said Friday that there were indications Mangione may now give up on his fight to prevent extradition from Pennsylvania.

“We going to continue to press forward on parallel paths, and we’ll be ready whether he is going to waive extradition or whether he is going to contest extradition,” Bragg said at an unrelated press conference in Times Square.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Ken Silva is a staff writer at Headline USA. Follow him at x.com/jd_cashless.

Another Office to Destroy? Kamala Refuses to Fade Away after 2024 Defeat

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) Outgoing Vice President Kamala Harris is not backing down after losing the 2024 election to President-elect Donald Trump. She is already hinting at her next political move and which public office she will tarnish. 

Harris has informed donors that they “haven’t seen the last of” her and pledged to “not go quietly into the night,” according to a Sunday report by CNN reporter Edwart-Isaac Dovere. However, her aides are divided on whether she should run for California governor in 2026.

A gubernatorial bid would echo Richard Nixon’s decision to run for California governor after serving as Vice President under President Dwight Eisenhower and losing the Republican nomination for president in 1960 to John F. Kennedy.  

While Nixon lost the 1962 governor’s race to Pat Brown, he went on to become the 37th president after winning the 1969 election. 

According to CNN, Harris must determine whether she can win a competitive Democratic primary for the 2028 cycle. Some of her allies believe she might whitewash her reputation by serving as governor for two years. Current California Gov. Gavin Newsom is term-limited.

While other Democrats are already in the race for governor, some have expressed their willingness to step aside if Harris decides to run. She would need to decide whether to throw her name in the hat by the summer of 2025. 

Others warn that running for governor and then for president in less than two years could look bad for the already unpopular vice president. 

“If you’re thinking of running for president in 2028, the worst thing you can do is run for governor in 2026,” a former Harris advisor told CNN, stating that the vice president would have to view the governorship as “more of a capstone than a stepping stone.” 

Another individual remarked that seeking the governorship would be a demotion: “Running for governor would be a step down, and it would interfere with her ability to run for president again. I don’t know if she’s going to run for president again, but a shot at running for president again is worth giving up running for governor.” 

The speculation about Harris’s future comes just over a month after her defeat in the 2024 race against Trump. Trump, a former vice president, is the only man since Grover Cleveland to lose the White House and then regain it four years later. 

During the campaign, Trump portrayed Harris as a flawed politician, lacking ideas and refusing to face tough questions by visiting friendly news outlets only. She previously lost the Democratic nomination for president twice in 2020.  

Prior to her vice presidency, Harris served as the District Attorney for San Francisco, California Attorney General, and U.S. Senator for California. 

Partisan to Its Core: Obama Judge Cancels Retirement After Trump’s Landslide Victory

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) An Obama-appointed judge has rescinded his previously announced retirement after it became clear that President-elect Donald Trump and the incoming Republican-led Senate would be able to appoint his successor. 

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals Judge James Wynn informed outgoing President Joe Biden on Friday that he “decided to continue in regular active service” as a federal appellate judge. Wynn had initially announced his retirement on January 5, 2024—nearly a year ago. 

Wynn’s unexpected reversal occurred less than two months after voters rejected Democratic governance in the 2024 election, leading Republicans to take control of the White House and both chambers of Congress. 

Critics suggest that Wynn’s decision to cancel his retirement was influenced by a deal made by Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., with Democrats to block the nomination of the federal judge’s proposed successor. 

The November agreement involved Democrats conceding to at least three judicial vacancies in exchange for other judicial nominations. Wynn’s vacancy was among those affected by this deal, according to The Herald Sun.

“Judge Wynn’s brazenly partisan decision to rescind his retirement is an unprecedented move that demonstrates some judges are nothing more than politicians in robes,” Tillis wrote in X.  

The GOP senator added, “Judge Wynn clearly takes issue with the fact that @realDonaldTrump was just elected President, and this decision is a slap in the face to the U.S. Senate, which came to a bipartisan agreement to hold off on confirming his replacement until the next Congress is sworn-in in January.” 

Tillis called on the Senate Judiciary Committee to hold a hearing on Wynn’s “blatant attempt to turn the judicial retirement system into a partisan game.” He also predicted that the incoming Trump administration would launch ethics complaints and recusal requests regarding Wynn’s actions. 

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell echoed Tillis’s sentiments, stating: “It’s not every day that a judge has a retirement party and then tells the President he’s going to keep his job.” 

McConnell continued, “I expect that Judge Wynn will face significant ethics complaints based on Canons 2 and 5 of the Code of Conduct for U.S. Judges, followed by serial recusal demands from the Department of Justice. He’s earned it.” 

Wynn is among several leftist judges who have canceled their plans to retire following Trump’s electoral landslide. Algenon Marbley, a U.S. district judge for the Southern District of Ohio, and Max Cogburn, of the Western District of North Carolina, made similar withdrawals. Marbley and Cogburn were appointed by former presidents Bill Clinton and Barack Obama, respectively. 

These seemingly partisan actions are reminiscent of the late Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who allegedly expressed in a letter her final wish to be replaced by whoever won the 2020 election, indicating she did not want then-President Trump to appoint her successor. 

Ginsburg’s alleged last wish did not materialize, as she was succeeded by Trump appointee Amy Coney Barrett. 

 

‘I’m Sick of It’: ESPN Host Calls Out Dems, Affirms Trump on J6, FBI Corruption

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) ESPN commentator and podcast host Stephen A. Smith rebuked the Democrats for dismissing Republicans’ concerns as false, only for them to later be proven true. He cited the FBI’s role in the Jan. 6 Capitol riot as the latest example of a so-called conspiracy that turned out to be fact. 

On the Friday episode of his eponymous podcast, Smith said he was “sick” of the left’s tendency to shut down inconvenient facts as falsehoods or conspiracy theories: “I’m really, really sick and tired of every time I turn around, finding something else that the Democrats have lied about, or downplayed or misrepresented along the way.” 

On Thursday, the DOJ’s Inspector General confirmed that at least 26 FBI informants were present at the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. Democrats had long dismissed such facts as conspiratorial. Even more troubling, only three of the informants were authorized to be there. 

“We didn’t hear anything about that before the election… [nor] when the ‘insurrection’ was broached by Vice President Kamala Harris … by President Biden before her, by Democrats in both the House and Senate, as they articulated the belief that Donald Trump was a danger to democracy and using this as a profound, illuminating bullet point to make that case,” Smith said. 

He added, “And now, here we are again, finding even more evidence to Donald Trump’s claim when he articulated: ‘The process is rigged. The Democrats are this or that, talking about us, but look at what they do.’” 

Smith then turned to other controversies surrounding the Democratic Party, including the billion dollars spent by Harris on her failed 2024 White House bid: “Where is the $1.5 billion that was given to the Democratic Party? Where’s it? Where did the money go? Why was Oprah given $2.5 million? Why was Al Sharpton’s National Action Network given that much money?” 

The ESPN personality said he was “getting really ticked off every time [conservatives] open their mouths about something pertaining to y’all, they seem right!” 

Smith also criticized Democrats for their inconsistent portrayal of Biden’s energy, pointing to viral videos showing him struggling. He also addressed Biden’s reversal on pardoning his son, Hunter, for his criminal convictions. 

“All you had to say was, ‘I’m pardoning my son because he’s my son.’ You couldn’t just say that, though. You know why you couldn’t just say that, President Biden? Because you had been telling us that you were going to do the last thing you were going to do,” Smith said of Biden. 

Smith also took aim at the Democrats’ repeated mantra that “no one is above the law,” highlighting their hypocrisy. 

“How many times did the Democrats tell us, ‘No one’s above the law’? … Nancy Pelosi, Hakeem Jeffries, Elizabeth Warren—who makes you feel like your soul is going to hell if you don’t agree with her…,” Smith remarked. 

Smith concluded with a pointed reflection on the state of the powerless and defeated Democratic Party: “I don’t know about y’all, but I’m sick of all of it. … They’ve actually made Donald Trump look like he was right instead of them. Think about that! He didn’t just raise his fist on election night as a victor. He’s been raising it every night ever since for one different issue after another. He keeps winning because he keeps highlighting what they lied about.” 

He added, “I’m sick of it. I have nothing more to say.” 

Mayorkas to Panicking States: Drones Are Real, But Our Hands Are Tied

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) As Americans grow increasingly concerned about industrial-level drones flying over their homes, the Biden administration and local governments continue to pass the buck, each blaming the other for the inaction. 

In a Sunday interview on ABC News’s This Week with George Stephanopoulos, DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas claimed the federal government has limited resources and authority to address the drones. 

“We are working in close coordination with state and local authorities, and it is critical, as we all have said, for a number of years that we need from Congress additional authorities to address the drone situation,” Mayorkas claimed. 

He added, “Our authorities currently are limited, and they are set to expire. We need them extended and expanded.” 

Mayorkas’s claim of limited federal authority directly contradicts state and local officials, including New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy, who argue the issue falls “squarely” under federal jurisdiction. 

In a Dec. 12 letter, Murphy urged President Joe Biden to deploy federal resources, arguing that current law “hamstrung” state and local officials. 

“The proliferation of this technology has introduced additional risks to public safety, privacy, and homeland security, while state and local law enforcement entities remain hamstrung by existing laws and policies to successfully counteract them, leaving action around UAS squarely on the shoulder of the federal government,” Murphy wrote. 

The drone sightings began before Thanksgiving and gained viral attention on social media. Despite growing concerns, it remains unclear what actions the federal government has taken to mitigate security and privacy risks. 

Meanwhile, state and local governments point to the federal government, while the Biden administration shifts responsibility to Congress, claiming lawmakers must expand federal authority to address the issue effectively.

When asked what “exactly” he needed from Congress, Mayorkas replied: “We want state and local authorities to also have the ability to counter drone activity under federal supervision. That is one important element that we have requested, and we’ve heard it echoed by the state and local officials themselves.” 

Stephanopoulos then asked Mayorkas to address President-elect Donald Trump’s concerns about the government’s withholding information about the drones surveilling airports, homes and military bases.

“We are aware of the drone sightings, as I’ve said,” Mayorkas responded. “I think there are more than 8,000 drones flown every day in the United States.”

He continued, “With respect to the ability to incapacitate those drones, we are limited in our authorities. We have certain agencies within the Department of Homeland Security that can do that, and outside our department, but we need those authorities expanded as well.”

Watch Mayorkas’s full remarks below:

Chris Rock Takes Aim at Democrat President and His ‘Pregnant Slaves’

(Julianna Frieman, Headline USA) Comedian Chris Rock took aim at former President Bill Clinton and his “pregnant slaves” during his opening monologue on Saturday Night Live.

Democrats were not off-limits to Rock, who was quick to point to the hypocrisy of quivering leftists dreading Trump’s second term.

“A lot of people are scared. It’s like, oh my God, he is going to be so undignified. And when I say a lot of people, I’m talking about the nine New Yorkers who that didn’t vote for him, okay?” Rock told his SNL audience, likely referencing Trump’s historic gains in Democrat strongholds.

He paced the stage as he delivered his stand-up routine, joking that American politics are not as prestigious as Democrats often claim.

“No, no, no. People are like, ‘He’s going to be so undignified. It’s the presidency of the United States,’” the comedian mocked with a whining tone. “Dude, it’s the United States presidency. It’s not, you know, come on. We’ve had some presidents in the United States.”

Rock specifically named Clinton in his jovial criticism of the Democratic Party, implying that other Democrat presidents deserve the same level of scrutiny.

“Come on, man. This is not the most dignified job in the world,” he said. “We’ve had presidents show up to the inauguration with pregnant slaves, okay?” he told a laughing audience. “And I’m just talking about Bill Clinton!”

Rock’s jab at Clinton appeared to reference the Democrat’s scandalous reputation when it comes to sex, particularly relating to his infamous affair with Monica Lewinsky.

Clinton’s two-year affair with a then-21-year-old Lewinsky, an unpaid intern, dominated news coverage in the 1990s and later clouded the Democrat president’s legacy.

Julianna Frieman is a freelance writer published by the Daily Caller, Headline USA, The Federalist, and The American Spectator. Follow her on Twitter at @JuliannaFrieman.

‘I Reported This Exclusively’: Megyn Kelly Reflects on Chasing Down Duke Lacrosse Hoaxer

(Julianna Frieman, Headline USA) SiriusXM’s Megyn Kelly reflected on chasing down Duke lacrosse rape hoaxer Crystal Mangum more than one decade ago as a Fox News reporter.

Mangum, a former stripper, admitted Wednesday that she lied about her March 2006 story in which she falsely accused then-students David Evans, Collin Finnerty and Reade Seligmann of gang-raping her at a party.

In an episode of her podcast posted Saturday, Kelly recalled only she and Court TV reporter Dan Abrams reported “honestly” and “accurately” on the case as it unraveled before the country. She added, “I reported this exclusively.”

“Everyone. Everyone else in the media rushed to judgement,” she said.

Kelly referred to Mangum’s lie as the tipping point when news outlets began to racially politicize journalism through trials by media without assumption of innocence before guilt.

The SiriusXM star said she has known lacrosse players herself at Syracuse University, having dated the captain of her school’s team. She said the athletes “certainly weren’t a bunch of rapists.”

“The general atmosphere of debauchery did not seem impossible to me, and a bunch of guys drunk at a party, who’s to say it’s impossible?” Kelly commented. “So, I wasn’t ready to condemn them knee-jerk, but I also wasn’t of the thought, ‘No way.’”

Kelly was assigned to the Duke lacrosse allegations beat by her bosses at Fox News. She explained that she was sent to North Carolina to cover the story, citing one time when she and her colleagues visited Mangum’s neighborhood in hopes of getting a reaction from the rape accuser.

A police officer initially warned her team of Mangum’s dangerous neighborhood when they approached, Kelly said, but they pursued the story regardless. Mangum did not answer the door, but Kelly and her colleagues caught the rape accuser driving away, so they trailed her until they reached a stoplight.

“These guys’ pictures were all over everywhere. Their career as lacrosse players had already been brought to an unceremonious, early end and we did not think she was off limits,” Kelly told her listeners.

Kelly said her team decided to abort the mission when Mangum threw herself into the passenger seat to avoid being seen by the Fox News team.

“I think chasing her initially was the right call. But at some point, as a reporter, your humanity kicks in,” Kelly said, explaining why she and her colleagues left at that moment.

Mangum has been in prison since 2013 for killing her boyfriend. She is set to be released in 2026.

Julianna Frieman is a freelance writer published by the Daily Caller, Headline USA, The Federalist, and The American Spectator. Follow her on Twitter at @JuliannaFrieman.