Who Is Sara Biden? Joe’s In-Law Emerges as Central Figure in Foreign Cash Deals

(Paul Sperry, RealClearInvestigations) Trouble has followed Sara Catherine Jones since she married into the Biden family almost three decades ago.

Not long after her 1995 wedding to Jim Biden, she took a job with one of his brother Joe’s Senate donors, who later accused her of “fraud” and “unjust enrichment,” according to court records reviewed by RealClearInvestigations.

In the years since, she and her husband have been accused of reneging on debts and failing to pay their taxes, court and property records show.

Like their nephew, first son Hunter Biden, they have reportedly sold the promise of access to their powerful relative to companies, several of which have gone bankrupt, some of which are tied to foreign countries hostile to the United States.

Now, Sara Jones Biden has emerged as a key figure in the mushrooming Biden foreign influence-peddling scandal.

GOP lawmakers seek to question the 64-year-old licensed attorney as part of their investigation of President Biden for possible impeachable offenses, including bribery. They are especially interested in subpoenaed bank records that include almost a quarter million dollars in checks Sara Biden wrote to her brother-in-law Joe, conspicuously marking them as “loan repayment.”

Republicans want to ask her about the origin of those loans and whether checks were funded by Biden influence-peddling schemes with China.

“The Committees require you to provide details of these payments and other related matters,” the chairmen of the House Oversight and Judiciary committees said in a joint letter they sent to her last month demanding she make herself available for a transcribed interview. In addition, they sent a subpoena to her husband for testimony and information.

Although Hunter’s and Jim Biden’s questionable business dealings—and their possible blessing from the president—are drawing increasing scrutiny, Sara Biden has drawn little attention until now.

But court records and other documents show she has been a central player in the Biden family business for decades. They show how her and her husband’s desire for a lifestyle they could not quite afford has repeatedly led them to form relationships with shady figures and enterprises that often ended in lawsuits and even criminal investigations.

Looming over it all is Joe Biden. Documents recently obtained by government watchdog America First Legal, under a Freedom of Information Act request, reveal that Sara’s and Jim’s main business, the Lion Hall Group, shows up in more than 3,735 emails generated by the former Vice President Biden’s office.

The sheer volume of communications concerning his brother’s and sister-in-law’s business appears to contradict Biden’s repeated claims over the years that he was never involved in, or even aware of, his family’s business dealings.

A Match Made in Kentucky

Sara Biden’s links to Joe Biden date back to the early 1990s, when she landed a committee job with his close personal friend, Sen. Wendell Ford, D-Ky.

“Sen. Ford has been an important part of our family for a long time,” Joe Biden said after Ford died in 2015. “He gave Sara Jones Biden, from Owensboro, Ky., her first job on the Hill when she graduated from Duke Law School, and that’s how she met my brother Jimmy.”

Jimmy and Sara weren’t just sweethearts; they were also business partners—with a taste for high living.

In 1997, Sara and Jim Biden formed consulting firm Lion Hall Group with the help of Joe Biden’s old law partner, David Walsh, who acted as their registered agent, according to incorporation records they filed with the Delaware Department of State.

That same year, they bought an expensive home in the Philadelphia suburbs and struggled to make payments on the $650,000 mortgage, records show, even though a longtime Democratic fundraiser for then-Sen. Biden, Joel Boyarsky, loaned them as much as $200,000. In 1998, the IRS filed its first lien against their home to collect $145,000 in unpaid taxes.

In 2000, they borrowed $353,000 from another Biden donor—Leonard Barrack, a Philadelphia attorney who a few years earlier had agreed to hire Sara Biden at Jim’s urging for $300,000 per year, according to court and other records. Barrack would soon regret helping them out.

According to a lawsuit he filed against Sara Biden four years later, Barrack said Jim had convinced him that by hiring Sara as a partner, the Bidens would be able to attract clients to his law firm through their political connections.

“Jim Biden assured Barrack that he would be able to generate business for the Barrack Law Firm through his family name and his resemblance to his brother, United States Senator Joseph Biden of Delaware,” according to the 2004 complaint filed in Philadelphia County, Pa.

Instead, the document said, Sara Biden developed business opportunities for Lion Hall Group, where she served as president, a potential conflict of interest she allegedly never disclosed to Barrack.

The law firm, also known as Barrack, Rodos & Bacine, further alleged that she used its resources, including a travel budget, for personal benefit. The lawsuit said Sara Biden spent almost $250,000 to travel with her husband to Hawaii and Alaska and across Europe, including England, Ireland, France, and Italy. They even brought their son, Nicholas (now 26), and a nanny on some of the “lavish” trips.

“Contrary to Sara Biden’s representations, none of the foregoing trips generated any business for the Barrack Law Firm,” the suit stated. “The Bidens never intended to generate business opportunities for the Barrack Law Firm during their travels, using the trips instead for personal pleasure and to develop opportunities for Lion Hall.”

The couple also allegedly received a total of $500,000 in loans before Sara left the firm in 2003. These salary advances were never repaid, according to the legal complaint.

The case, which charged Sara and Lion Hall Group with “fraud,” “unjust enrichment” and “breach of contract,” was eventually settled. The terms are undisclosed.

Sara Biden did not respond to requests for comment. However, in a law publication profile she asserted that she “co-founded” the Barrack law firm’s “institutional development and claims monitoring program.”

Barrack apparently was unaware she was pursuing other outside interests while allegedly looting his firm.

In 2000, then-Vice President Al Gore and HUD Secretary Andrew Cuomo announced a new $2 million partnership with NorthPoint Communications to help “bridge the digital divide” by providing broadband Internet access to more than 800 low-income urban neighborhoods.

Looking for political juice to help it win the licenses needed from the FCC for telecom development, NorthPoint invited Sara Biden to join its board, along with Hunter Biden.

At the time, Hunter served as executive director of e-commerce policy at the Commerce Department, a Clinton-appointed position. It’s not known if his Aunt Sara did any lobbying for Northpoint, but Federal Election Commission records show that in 2000 she gave $1,200 to Northpoint’s PAC—People for Digital Competition.

Sara Biden does not appear in federal lobbying disclosure records as a registered lobbyist. Northpoint filed bankruptcy in 2001.

Several years later, another Biden donor retained her and Lion Hall Group to lobby Sen. Biden and other senators for passage of a bill to help resolve tobacco-related medical claims.

Although the bill, which Joe Biden supported, died in the Senate, the donor who pushed it—famous Mississippi trial attorney Dickie Scruggs—introduced Sara Biden to two associates, also Biden donors, who proposed bringing her into a potentially lucrative venture, according to legal documents.

Mississippi lawyers Steve Patterson and Timothy Balducci were looking to build a Democratic lobbying firm in Washington with global reach, and offered to make Sara a partner in the firm, which they planned to call “Patterson Balducci & Biden.”

But the deal fell apart when Balducci and Patterson were indicted on federal bribery charges in an investigation that also ensnared Scruggs. After all three men went to federal prison, Biden was forced to return their donations.

Sara and her husband had more trouble with the IRS in 2013, when the agency slapped them with another lien for unpaid taxes, this one totaling $589,000. They also faced state and local tax liens, property records show.

The couple had just purchased a $2.5 million luxury vacation home in Naples, Fla., which the entire Biden clan, including Joe, used. But they racked up debt renovating the home—dubbed the “Biden Bungalow”—and went in search of more bailout money.

Owing a combined $700,000 in tax and vendor liens, they quickly found another Joe Biden supporter to rescue them. Over the next few years, millionaire car magnate and major Biden donor John Hynansky of Delaware floated Sara and Jim Biden “loans” totaling $900,000, records show.

During this same period, as then-Vice President Biden was the point person for U.S. policy in Ukraine, a federal lending agency—OPIC—authorized loans Hynansky’s company used to build a 7,300-square-foot Porsche dealership along the highway that connects downtown Kyiv to the Boryspil International Airport.

Mortgage records initially reported Jim and Sara Biden’s lender as “1018 PL, LLC,” obscuring Hynansky as the source of the loans. But the corporate entity is controlled by Hynansky, a 2018 document would later reveal.

The Bidens sold the waterfront house for a loss in 2018, and Hynansky released his lien on the property. However, Hynansky did not acknowledge full payment and satisfaction of the loans, according to the details laid out in documents recorded in Collier County, Fla.

Hynansky wasn’t their only white knight.

As the Bidens struggled to find money to pay contractors for hurricane-related repairs on their beach home, and find a buyer for it, they went back to Joe’s old cronies from Mississippi.

One of them, Mississippi lawyer Joey Langston, who had been sentenced to three years in federal prison for improperly trying to influence a judge, introduced them to the founder of Americore Health, who needed money to aggressively expand his chain of rural hospitals.

Jim invoked his brother’s influence and said they had the political clout to drum up investment money, according to court documents and published reports. Impressed, Americore not only hired Lion Hall Group but loaned Jim and Sara Biden $650,000 for their personal use, even as the company hemorrhaged cash.

The funds could have been used to help the company’s failing hospitals, which had to lay off hundreds of employees after Americore failed. As soon as the couple received their loan payment, however, they stepped back from the venture and the promised investments never materialized, according to a lawsuit filed against Jim Biden and Lion Hall Group by Americore’s medical partners after it went bankrupt in 2019.

In a declaration, one plaintiff described Jim Biden as a con man who repeatedly made false promises “on the Biden’s [sic] family name.” According to a recent court filing, Diverse Medical Management and Azzam Medical Services, which hoped to manage Americore hospitals, claimed “Biden and his wife, Sara Biden” made false assurances during a dinner they held at their home near Philadelphia that funding for the venture was forthcoming.

Meanwhile, Americore trustees have tried to claw back the $650,000 from the Bidens in bankruptcy court. An attorney for Jim Biden maintains that his client recently repaid Americore half the amount to settle the dispute.

After rural hospitals were forced to close their doors in Pennsylvania and other states, the FBI stepped in to investigate the Americore debacle as part of a criminal fraud investigation. While agents have questioned witnesses about Jim Biden’s role in the collapse, according to multiple reports, it’s unclear if his wife has been questioned. She did not reply to inquiries.

Around the same time the couple was raking in hundreds of thousands of dollars from the crooked hospital deal, Hunter Biden was sending hundreds of thousands more to his Uncle Jim and Aunt Sara—and impeachment investigators on the Hill hope to question Sara about the origin and flow of these funds.

Starting in the summer of 2017, Hunter began sending large wire transfers to Sara and Jim’s Lion Hall Group—some of which ended up in Joe Biden’s bank account.

The source of the funds was CEFC China Energy, a Chinese conglomerate tied to Chinese military intelligence. After a year, Lion Hall had received $1.4 million from Hunter Biden.

On Aug. 14, 2017, Hunter Biden wired $150,000 to Lion Hall after receiving $400,000 from a joint account he held with CEFC.

On Aug. 28, 2017, Sara Biden withdrew $50,000 in cash from Lion Hall’s account. Later the same day, she deposited it into her and Jim Biden’s personal checking account, according to bank records subpoenaed by the House Oversight Committee.

On Sept. 3, 2017, Sara Biden wrote a check to Joe Biden for $40,000 for a “loan repayment,” exactly 10% of the $400,000—matching a “10 held by H for the big guy” arrangement Hunter had made for Joe in the Chinese venture that was discovered in emails from his abandoned laptop.

Another personal check to Joe made out in Sara’s handwriting, this one for $200,000, was cut on March 1, 2018—the same day Jim Biden got an equal amount from Americore. “Loan repayment” was also filled in for the memo line of the check.

If there were, in fact, loans between Joe Biden and his sister-in-law, the White House has not explained the reason for them or provided any details about their terms, such as the interest rates charged. A White House spokesman has said only that the release of the bank records is part of “a smear campaign against the president” by Republican investigators.

“There is nothing more to these transactions,” said Paul Fishman, a lawyer representing Jim Biden, “and there is nothing wrong with them.”

However, the wire transfers raised red flags with Hunter’s bank, Wells Fargo, which asked about their “purpose” and also questioned the recipient, the Lion Hall Group.

The bank noted the owner, Sara Biden, is a “relative [and] the address appears to be a residential address,” adding “What is the business type?”

Unsatisfied with Hunter’s explanations, the bank flagged the transactions as potential financial crimes, including money laundering, prompting the U.S. Treasury Department to issue a series of suspicious activity reports.

When her bank asked Sara Biden about the large transfers, she claimed the payments were for international consulting work (neither she nor her husband is registered with the Justice Department as foreign agents). However, she refused to provide any supporting documentation. The bank, in turn, closed the Lion Hall account, according to a 2020 Senate report.

Impeachment investigators tell RCI that they have subpoenaed related bank records from Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase, HSBC, and Cathay Bank, in addition to Wells Fargo.

The Senate report noted that Jim and Sara Biden also benefitted from a $100,000 line of credit a CEFC executive opened for Hunter Biden in September 2017. After credit cards were issued to Hunter, as well as his uncle and aunt, they went on “an extravagant global shopping spree.”

Records show Hunter, Jim, and Sara Biden used the cards for plane tickets, hotel rooms, and electronic devices, among other things.

House impeachment investigators tell RCI that Sara Biden, who acted as an apparent financial conduit, may hold answers to whether the president also benefitted from the Chinese largesse as part of a “foreign influence-peddling scheme,” which they say could “compromise his decision-making and threaten national security.”

They also seek to find out how much interaction Joe Biden has had with her business, the Lion Hall Group, while in office.

Congressional investigators suspect that Lion Hall, which was incorporated by Joe Biden’s old law partner, was set up to act as a pass-through vehicle to launder possible bribes to Joe Biden.

They point out that Biden’s Mississippi donor pal Joey Langston pumped almost $200,000 into Lion Hall for unspecified services while Biden was vice president.

According to subpoenaed Lion Hall bank records, Langston Law Firm Consulting Inc. began wiring money to Lion Hall within weeks of Langston losing his appeal in February 2016 to have his conviction for bribing a judge thrown out.

A federal judge also turned down his petition to have his criminal record cleared.

Records show that between March 2016 and October 2016, Langston made four payments to Lion Hall totaling $187,000.

Investigators have asked Langston to come in for questioning and explain the nature of the payments. Attempts to reach Langston for comment were unsuccessful.

Pharmacies Providing Medical Info to Law Enforcement w/o Warrant

(Ken Silva, Headline USA) A Senate Finance Committee inquiry has found that the country’s biggest pharmacies are handing over customer medical records to law enforcement agencies without requiring warrants.

Senate Finance Committee Chair Ron Wyden, D-Ore., revealed this in a Tuesday letter to Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra, raising concerns about the situation.

“All of the pharmacies surveyed stated that they do not require a warrant prior to sharing pharmacy records with law enforcement agents, unless there is a state law that dictates otherwise.” Wyden said in the letter, referencing Amazon, Cigna, Optum Rx, Walmart, Walgreens Boots Alliance, CVS Health, The Kroger Company and Rite Aid Corporation.

“Those pharmacies will turn medical records over in response to a mere subpoena, which often do not have to be reviewed or signed by a judge prior to being issued.”

Wyden also said some of the pharmacies—CVS Health, the Kroger Company and Rite Aid—provide the medical info to law enforcement without even conducting an internal review. Those companies allegedly instruct their pharmacy staff a to respond immediately to law enforcement demands.

And although pharmacies are legally permitted to tell their customers about government demands for their data, most don’t, he said.

In fact, only one company, Amazon, told Wyden that it has a policy of notifying customers about law enforcement demands for pharmacy records, as long as there is no legal prohibition to doing so. Amazon presumably does this because it already has a notification system set up for when law enforcement collects other customer data.

Wyden and two of his colleagues urged Becerra to update HIPAA regulations to better protect customers.

“Pharmacies can and should insist on a warrant, and invite law enforcement agencies that insist on demanding patient medical records with solely a subpoena to go to court to enforce that demand,” he said.

“The requirement for a warrant is exactly the approach taken by tech companies to protect customer privacy.”

In response to Wyden’s findings, an Amazon spokeswoman told the Washington Post that the company cooperates with law enforcement requests as required and that such requests “represent a very small percentage of the prescriptions we fill for customers.”

A Walgreens spokesman reportedly said the company’s law enforcement process follows HIPAA and other applicable laws, while a Walmart spokeswoman said the company takes its “customers’ privacy seriously as well as our obligation to law enforcement.”

An Amazon spokeswoman told the Post that the company cooperates with law enforcement requests as required and that such requests “represent a very small percentage of the prescriptions we fill for customers.”

Rite Aid declined to comment, and other companies did not respond to the Post’s requests for comment.

Ken Silva is a staff writer at Headline USA. Follow him at twitter.com/jd_cashless.

Hunter Biden Defies House Subpoena, Grandstands Outside Capitol

(Headline USA) Hunter Biden blasted House Republicans for investigating his family’s business dealings after defying a congressional deposition on Wednesday, accusing lawmakers of belittling his recovery from drug addiction, NBC News reported.

“For six years, I have been a target of the unrelenting Trump attack machine shouting, ‘Where’s Hunter?’ Well, here’s my answer. I am here,” he said.

The first son was ordered by the House Oversight Committee to appear before lawmakers for a closed-door deposition this week, but he refused to show up, demanding instead that the committee make the hearing public.

In a press conference on Capitol Hill, Hunter Biden claimed the only reason he showed up in Washington at all was to “make sure that the House committees’ illegitimate investigations of my family do not proceed on distortions, manipulated evidence and lies.”

The one-time drug-addict—who is presumably in recovery, despite recent indications to the contrary—also reiterated his bizarre claim that Republicans were trying to “kill” him and accused them of using the investigation to “undermine” the reelection campaign of his father, President Joe Biden.

“They just began to attack, and attack, and attack, and, you know, addiction provides for a lot of openings for people,” Hunter Biden said. “They’re trying to kill me through other means.”

Hunter admitted that, “in the depths of my addiction,” he was “extremely irresponsible” with his finances, but insisted that Joe Biden had nothing to do with his influence-peddling scheme.

“Not as a practicing lawyer, as a board member of Burisma, not in my partnership with a Chinese private businessman, not in my investments at home nor abroad and certainly not as an artist,” he said, adding that Joe Biden has only ever “devoted his entire life to service.”

The comments come just days after Hunter Biden was slapped with nine new criminal charges for tax fraud as a result of special counsel David Weiss’s investigation, and just hours before House Republicans voted to formalize the impeachment inquiry into President Joe Biden.

Ranchers Suing Colorado, Federal Agencies over Wolf Reintroduction

(A pair of trade groups representing Colorado ranchers are suing state and federal wildlife agencies to delay reintroducing gray wolves to the Western Slope.

The lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court by the Colorado Cattlemen’s Association and Gunnison County Stockgrowers Association, comes before the state’s deadline to reintroduce gray wolves by the end of this year.

Colorado voters passed Proposition 114 in 2020, which requires the Colorado Parks and Wildlife Commission to re-establish wolves by the end of this year.

Last month, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, one of the defendants in the lawsuit with CPW, approved a decision to designate Colorado’s wolves as an experimental population under the Endangered Species Act’s 10(j) rule.

“The decision to pursue legal action comes after extensive discussion and consultation with CCA and GCSA members, who are deeply committed to the prosperity of Colorado’s agricultural industry and the well-being of their livestock,” the groups said in a statement. “Both organizations, CCA and GCSA, have opposed wolf introduction since it was a proposed ballot initiative and were involved in every step of the process.”

The groups added that they participated in developing the commission’s plan and voiced their concerns throughout the process.

“Those concerns and looming conflicts were not sufficiently resolved during that public process,” they said.

While the groups say they’re “grateful” for the 10(j) rule’s approval, which allows for more flexibility in dealing with conflicts, the lawsuit asks the court to require the USFWS to conduct an environmental impact statement in compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act.

The groups also ask for an injunction to bar CPW from releasing any wolves until an environmental impact statement is completed.

“Impacts of wolf reintroduction, as would any other action of this magnitude, need to be properly reviewed to avoid unintended negative consequences to the natural environment, wildlife, and people of the impacted communities,” GCSA President Andy Spann said in a statement.

CPW has an agreement to bring 10 gray wolves from Oregon to Colorado.

New Mexico AG Sues Meta over Facebook/Instagram Pedophile Rings

(Ken Silva, Headline USA) New Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez sued Meta and its CEO, Mark Zuckerberg, last week for allowing sexual abuse, online solicitation and human trafficking on Facebook and Instagram.

Torrez said last week that his lawsuit comes after he carried out an undercover investigation of Meta’s platforms, creating decoy accounts of children 14-years and younger.

According to Torrez, his investigation discovered that Facebook and Instagram have “proactively served and directed the underage users a stream of egregious, sexually explicit images—even when the child has expressed no interest in this content.”

Further, the platforms allegedly have allowed dozens of adults to find, contact, and press children into providing sexually explicit pictures. On Facebook, children have even been recommended to join groups devoted to facilitating commercial sex, according to the attorney general.

In one instance, the AG’s undercover investigation found that Meta “allowed a fictitious mother to offer her 13-year-old daughter for sale to sex traffickers and to create a professional page to allow her daughter to share revenue from advertising,” Torrez added.

All in all, “the Office’s investigators found that certain child exploitative content is over ten times more prevalent on Facebook and Instagram than it is on Pornhub and OnlyFans,” Torrez said.

Torrez warned some images collected in his investigation were too disgusting to include in the lawsuit.

His Dec. 5 lawsuit seeks up to a $5,000 fine for every violation of the Unfair Practices Act, which prohibits “unconscionable trade practices in the conduct of any trade or commerce.”

The lawsuit comes after numerous reports about Meta allowing child sex-trafficking on its platforms.

In June, The Wall Street Journal published a 2,700-word article about how Instagram’s algorithms allegedly promote child pornography and connect pedophiles with each other. Following that report, Meta set up a child safety task force.

But on Dec. 1, the Journal published a follow-up article about how the pedophile problems on Instagram persist.

“The company has taken down hashtags related to pedophilia, but its systems sometimes recommend new ones with minor variations,” the latest Journal article stated. “Even when Meta is alerted to problem accounts and user groups, it has been spotty in removing them.”

Ken Silva is a staff writer at Headline USA. Follow him at twitter.com/jd_cashless.

Report: Recruiting Shortfalls Leave Navy Carrier Undermanned

(Ken Silva, Headline USA) The U.S. military’s recruitment shortfall has taken such a toll that the Navy apparently can’t fully staff some of its carriers, according to a recent article in Forbes.

Forbes reported Tuesday that the USS Gerald R. Ford has downsized its crew by 500 to 600 sailor in the last six months.

The vessel is now reportedly operating below its original objective of 2,391 crew members. In an email to Forbes, Captian Rick Burgess reportedly said the USS Ford is now “home to 4,070 sailors: 2,380 ship’s company, 1,550 assigned to Carrier Wing EIGHT, and 140 embarked with Carrier Strike Group TWELVE and Destroyer Squadron TWO staffs.”

About a year ago, the ship had between 4,600 and 4,700 sailors: about 2,700 crew members, 1,700 people from the carrier wing, and 200-300 additional folks for the strike group staff and destroyer squadron staff.

“The current complement appears to be unusually low,” Forbes commented. “Even the aircraft carrier’s December 2021 Selected Acquisition Report projected a ‘ship’s force’ of 2716 billets, far higher than the 2,380 sailors currently aboard.”

The shortage of sailors appears to be from attrition, with the Navy unable to replace sailors with new recruits. The Navy fell 20% short of its recruitment goals for 2023.

However, Forbes tried to put a positive spin on the situation. The fact that the USS Ford is still able to operate—it’s currently deployed in the Mediterranean—is a feat unto its own, the publication argued.

“Major and rapidly implemented crew cuts usually come with serious consequences, reducing vessel endurance, readiness and survivability,” Forbes said.

“But, rather than break down, the carrier is breaking performance records. In fact, the ship recently spent ten weeks away from port, in what appears to be the vessel’s longest uninterrupted period at sea since it was launched.”

Earlier this year, Navy invited an active-duty soldier who performs as a drag queen to be a “digital ambassador” and help the military branch “attract the most talented and diverse workforce” amidst the plunging recruitment.

Meanwhile, some legislators are pushing the idea that the military should hire illegal immigrants to make up for its shortfalls.

“My colleague from Illinois [Sen. Tammy Duckworth] has a bill that says if you’re an undocumented person in this country and you can pass the background test and the like, you can serve in our military. And if you do it honorably, we will make you citizens of the United States,” Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., said on the Senate floor earlier this month.

“Do we need that? Do you know what the recruiting numbers are at the Army, Navy and Air Force? They can’t find enough people. And there are undocumented people who want to serve this country. Should we give them the chance? I think we should.”

Ken Silva is a staff writer at Headline USA. Follow him at twitter.com/jd_cashless.

Existing Home Sales on Track for Worst Year Since at Least 2008

(Existing home sales are on track for a dismal year, likely dropping 18% and on course for the worst year since at least 2008’s Great Recession and possibly the worst since 1995.

And while prices may soften in 2024, single-family homes will remain out of reach for many Americans, National Association of Realtors Chief Economist Lawrence Yun said Tuesday in the real estate organization’s annual summit.

TCS - NAR chart 2023

The previous times when home sales were at similar levels both indicated a recessionary economy, although the Biden administration has steadfastly denied any such thing—partially by attempting to redefine the meaning of the word “recession.”

Despite the Democrat president’s efforts to sell himself as a successful steward of the nation’s financial affairs, voters have remained unconvinced, scoring him particularly low marks as inflation, along with sky-high interest rates, force many to fall back on credit and hope for the best.

The Federal Reserve is expected to cut rates next year, but Yun said he expects the average U.S. mortgage rate to remain around 6.3% in 2024, much higher than rates over the last decade.

He said he expects the Federal Reserve to cut rates up to four times in 2024, with the first rate cut coming in the spring of next year. Those expected rate cuts, plus other data points, could lead to more home sales in 2024, Yun said.

“So the forecast is that home sales after two straight years of difficulty will begin to rise next year,” he said Tuesday.

Yun predicted existing-home sales would increase 13% in 2024.

Pent-up demand in some areas could make for significant growth in the new year.

“What we are finding is that the area’s with strong home sales growth potential next year in the south region will be Austin, Dallas, Houston, Nashville to come back,” Yun said.

The Durham-Chapel Hill area could “become the next Austin,” Yun said.

TCS - Top Pent-up demand markets

Homes could become more affordable in 2024, but not by much, said Danielle Hale, the chief economist for realtor.com.

“One thing that I think is going to be a bright spot for buyers in 2024, for many of whom are probably worn out from the persistent theme of a lack of affordability that we’ve seen in the housing market is that we actually do expect affordability to start to improve and 2024,” she said. “We’re not going to see a big turnaround, but I do think we’re going to see a baby step in the right direction.”

Headline USA’s Ben Sellers contributed to this report.

Ex-Rep. Santos Alleges Congressional Adultery Scandal, Teases Tell-All Book

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) Former Rep. George Santos, R-N.Y., made explicit accusations of adultery among lawmakers in a candid interview with CBS New York’s Marcia Kramer.

Santos, who faced expulsion from Congress due to allegations of corruption, claimed on Sunday that members of Congress engaged in infidelity with each other, delivering a severe allegation against his former colleagues.

The accusations surfaced when Kramer asked Santos about the “strangest thing” he witnessed during his brief tenure as a House representative.

“The strangest thing in Washington [that] I witnessed was people cheating on their spouses,” Santos declared to a disbelieving Kramer.

“What!?” Kramer reacted in surprise, exclaiming, “No!”

Santos reaffirmed his claim, stating, “In the manner I saw it, it was very strange to me—when two married people are cheating on both their spouses while they’re back home, supposedly serving in Congress—that felt gross.”

“Members of Congress? Staffers? Who?” Kramer inquired, to which Santos responded, “Members of Congress cheating on their spouses with one another. That’s how bad it is in D.C..” 

Despite the inquiry, the former lawmaker refused to disclose specific names, cautioning, “That’s going to get me a lot of heat… I’m not dropping names.” 

In an earlier part of the interview, Santos discussed he will write a book about his experiences in Congress. 

In an earlier part of the interview, Santos said he is discussing a potential book to detail his experiences in Congress and to present his perspective on accusations that he misused campaign funds, including expenses on Botox and a luxury bag.

Moreover, Santos faces numerous federal charges related to his congressional campaign, including conspiracy, wire fraud, false statements, falsification of records, aggravated identity theft and credit card fraud. 

Santos has pleaded not guilty but was expelled from Congress after the House Ethics Committee released a damning report regarding similar accusations. 

Following his expulsion, Santos directed his ire towards several lawmakers, which comprised some of the leading voices that advocated for his removal. Specifically, Santos is raising the alarm over potential insider trading, among other accusations.

Those targeted included Reps. Nicole Malliotakis, R-N.Y.; Mike Lawler, R-N.Y.; Jamaal Bowman, D-N.Y., and Rob Menendez, D-N.J. (son of Sen. Bob Menendez, D-N.J.). 

Bye-Bye GOP Majority? NY Court Lets Dems Redraw Key Districts

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) A New York congressional map, credited with aiding Republicans in securing the majority during the 2022 midterm elections, has been mandated for a redraw by the state’s highest court. 

According to Fox News, the New York Court of Appeals has directed the state’s redistricting commission to create a new map ahead of the 2024 presidential election, following legal challenges from Democrats.

“We are asked to remedy a constitutional deficiency in the 2022 redistricting process that was attributable to the [Independent Redistricting Commission] abdication of its constitutional duty,” ruled Chief Judge Rowan D. Wilson, as reported by Fox.

The order comes after the contentious map sparked partisan clashes and legal debates during the midterms. The Court of Appeals appointed a “special master” to devise a new map, as recounted by Fox. 

This map resulted in four Democrat-controlled districts flipping to Republicans in 2022, contributing to the Republicans’ narrow majority that year. Reps. Anthony D’Esposito, Nick LaLota, Mike Lawler and George Santos (now an expelled House member) secured victory following the newly drawn maps.

Fox reported that, following legal challenges by Democrats, the Court of Appeals instructed the bipartisan Independent Redistricting Commission—established after a 2014 constitutional amendment but failed to reach a consensus—to devise a new plan. 

Republicans on Twitter criticized the decision, denouncing it as an attempt to cling to power. Rep. Elise Stefanik, R-N.Y., rebuked the decision in a joint press release with New York GOP Chairman Ed Cox.

“The decision today opens the door for Democrats to rig our congressional district lines so that elections are decided not by the voters, but by politicians in a back room,” Stefanik and Cox stated.

“In their relentless pursuit of power at all costs, corrupt Democrats in Albany and Washington have politicized the Court of Appeals. Its once esteemed reputation is in tatters,” the duo added.

 

Lawmakers likely to be affected by the new maps also criticized the order. “Stacking the court to influence its decision is a direct threat to democratic norms in New York,” Lawler remarked, referring to the Court of Appeals.

LaLota urged the commission overseeing the new maps to ensure competitiveness ahead of the 2024 election. 

“While I disagree with the decision to jettison NY’s current congressional map, I urge those drawing the new map to make the new districts compact & competitive,” he said. “Doing so ensures the 2024 election is about important policies, rather than predetermined partisan outcomes.” 

Santos, who has expelled out of Congress after a scathing House Ethics Committee report accusing him of fraud, took to Twitter to jest about his former colleagues, expressing his hope that Cameo, the platform he uses to receive money through video requests, would be open to aiding his colleagues if they were voted out.

Notably, Lawler, LaLota and D’Esposito were among Santos’s most vocal critics, leading efforts to oust him following accusations of corruption, fraud and falsifying campaign records.

Ga. Election Workers Try to Gag Giuliani from Saying He Told the Truth

(Jacob Bruns, Headline USA) Two women accused of rigging Georgia’s 2020 election are trying to prevent former New York Mayor Rudy Guiliani from speaking the truth during a defamation trial where the judge has predetermined his guilt, 11 Alive reported.

A federal trial began on Monday in Washington D.C. to determine how much Giuliani owes election workers for spreading allegedly false claims over video of them surreptitiously scanning fake ballots after the counting had shut down for the night at Fulton County’s State Farm Arena.

Specifically, two Georgia election workers, mother and daughter Ruby Freeman and Wandrea “Shaye” Moss, filed a defamation suit against Guiliani, who at the time was leading the legal efforts on behalf of then-President Donald Trump to challenge the disputed election outcome.

Evidence has shown that there were thousands of fake ballots counted in the Fulton County election, with many of them having been illegally destroyed afterward.

Nonetheless, U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell already deemed Giuliani to be guilty before the trial even began.

Now, the courts will determine how much Giuliani must pay in damages, with the duo asking for $15.5 million to $43 million—and a gag order that would prevent any further scrutiny of their actions.

Freeman and Moss filed a motion Monday night to stop Giuliani from saying that he told the truth about their actions in the aftermath of 2020, suggesting that he violated the court’s orders by insisting “I told the truth. They were engaged in changing votes” in a recent ABC News appearance.

One of the foremost arguments against a defamation decision would be if the statement were true or if the person saying it did so in good faith believing it to be true.

“Needless to say,” Freeman’s lawyer wrote in the gag order request, “were Defendant Giuliani to testify in a manner remotely resembling those comments, he would be in plain violation of the Court’s prior orders in this case conclusively affirming, and reaffirming, that all elements of liability have been established, including that Defendant Giuliani’s defamatory statements were false.”

Despite the mess in the courts, the FBI of all places has released evidence that might exonerate Giuliani of defamation, since the case hinges on the claim that Giuliani exposed Freeman’s name to the public in the wake of the Georgia election debacle, the Gateway Pundit reported.

According to the FBI’s report, Freeman was questioned after someone—possibly by her direction—created a social media account under her name the night of the election and made posts giving away her identity as an election worker.

“She stated the situation was bad due to the alleged posts, and that she had received over 500 emails, text messages, and was being harassed by having unsolicited pizza orders sent to her house,” the report said.

“People were also calling her neighbors and questioning them about her,” it added. “Freeman was asked to review some social media posts, but she declined to answer further questions until she retained an attorney.”

Still, the FBI redacted the name of the potential co-conspirator, who was reportedly left unpunished.