Boston Mayor Retracts Accidental Invites to Holiday Party for ‘Electeds of Color’

(Molly Bruns, Headline USA) A staffer for Boston Mayor Michelle Wu mistakenly sent all of the city councilors an email invitation to a holiday party exclusively for “electeds of color.”

Wu’s director of City Council relations, Denise DosSantos, sent the email inviting them “and a guest to the Electeds of Color Holiday Party,” quickly followed up by another email apologizing for inviting more people than intended, according to the Boston Herald.

The mayor’s office neglected to issue an apology for the invitation’s blatant racism.

“I wanted to apologize for my previous email regarding a Holiday Party for tomorrow,” DosSantos said in the follow up.

“I did send that to everyone by accident, and I apologize if my email may have offended or came across as so,” she continued. “Sorry for any confusion this may have caused.”

Several of Wu’s constituents reacted to the invitation on Twitter, flabbergasted by the outright racism against whites and subsequent non-apology.

“Do they have any idea that this is actually morally wrong?” one user asked.

“Democrats never change do they?” Another user quipped.

Some City Council members took no issue with the invitation.

“Your email should not offend anyone and there is absolutely no confusion,” said Councilor Tania Fernandes Anderson, a self-identified African immigrant and Muslim-American woman, who did receive and invitation. “Just like there are groups that meet based on shared interests or cultural backgrounds, it’s completely natural for elected officials of color to gather for a holiday celebration.”

Fellow Councilor Frank Baker, a white man and one of just a few conservatives, described the situation as “unfortunate and divisive,” but did not take offense to the lack of invitation.

“I don’t really get offended too easily,” Baker said. “To offend me, you’re going to have to do much more than not invite me to a party.”

It was not clear if Wu permitted her white husband to attend the event.

House Votes to Formalize Impeachment Inquiry into President Joe Biden

() The House of Representatives voted 221 to 212 Wednesday to formalize the impeachment inquiry into President Joe Biden, who faces allegations that he personally benefited from and lied about his son’s overseas business dealings, which raked in millions of dollars.

This vote was not a vote to impeach the president, only to formalize the impeachment inquiry which has been gathering and releasing evidence for months.

That evidence includes bank records, copies of checks and witness testimony backing allegations that the Biden family and associates received used the Biden family name to rake in more than $20 million from entities in China, Russia, Ukraine and more.

IRS whistleblowers also testified that the Department of Justice interfered in their investigation into Hunter Biden.

A longtime business associate of Hunter Biden’s has publicly said that the president spoke on speakerphone to Hunter’s business associates about 20 times.

Bank records released by the Oversight Committee appear to show monthly payments in 2018 from Hunter Biden’s company to the president.

“The Bidens layered these payments through their bank accounts to hide the sources of the money. The banks even flagged many of these transactions in more than 150 suspicious activity reports to the Treasury Department,” Oversight Committee Chair Rep. James Comer, R-Ky., said from the House floor Wednesday.

“One bank investigator was so concerned about Hunter Biden’s financial transactions with the Chinese company that he wanted to re-evaluate the bank’s relationship with him,” he added. “He noted that his transactions served ‘no current business purpose.'”

The president has repeatedly denied he benefited from his son’s alleged overseas dealings.

Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., the ranking minority member on the Oversight Committee, blasted the Republicans leading the inquiry, calling the effort a waste of time.

“This stupid, blundering investigation is keeping us from getting any real work done for the people of America,” Raskin claimed from the House floor before the vote.

The vote came the same day that Hunter Biden defied a congressional subpoena to appear for a deposition Wednesday. He had asked to testify publicly instead of in private, saying that House Republicans would twist his testimony.

“For six years I have been the target of the unrelenting Trump attack machine, shouting, ‘Where’s Hunter?” he told reporters outside the Capitol Wednesday morning. “Well, here’s my answer. I am here.”

In response, Comer and House Judiciary Chair Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, said they would initiate contempt of Congress proceedings against Hunter Biden. That could become a formal legal charge for the president’s son, who already faces multiple tax and gun charges.

“Hunter Biden today defied lawful subpoenas and we will now initiate contempt of Congress proceedings,” Comer and Jordan said in a joint statement.

“We will not provide special treatment because his last name is Biden. As our committees were today prepared to depose Hunter Biden, he chose to make a public statement on Capitol Hill instead where he said his father, Joe Biden was not financially involved in his family’s business dealings,” they added. “Exactly how was Joe Biden involved? Evidence shows Joe Biden met with Hunter’s business associates and his name was at the center of the family business strategy.”

House Majority Whip Tom Emmer, R-Minn., said at a press conference Tuesday that Wednesday’s formalization of the impeachment inquiry would bolster its legal ground.

Comer has already sent a flurry of subpoenas to Biden family and associates in recent weeks which may end up going to court.

“It’s clear the House will have to defend our lawful investigations in court, and passing this resolution will put us in the best position possible to enforce our subpoenas and set forth a clear process,” Emmer said.

Republicans argue the Biden administration was “stonewalling” the investigation.

“So far, two key DOJ witnesses have failed to show for congressionally subpoenaed depositions after DOJ directed them not to appear,” House Ways and Means Committee Chair Rep. Jason Smith, R-Mo., said from the House floor Wednesday.

“Other witnesses have refused to answer certain questions from investigators,” he added. “And the Biden Administration has refused to turn over many of the documents requested by Congress, claiming this inquiry was not properly authorized.”

POLL: 1 in 5 Mail-In Voters Admits to Committing Vote Fraud in 2020 Election

(Molly Bruns, Headline USA) A shocking new poll from the Heartland Institute and Rasmussen Reports revealed that one in every five voters who sent mail-in votes for the 2020 election engaged in vote fraud in one way or another.

When asked if they filled out a ballot for a friend or family member, 21% of respondents sayd “yes,” according to the poll.

Additionally, 17% of respondents voted in states where they were no longer permanent residents, and another 17% admitted to signing a ballot for a friend or family member.

Several respondents also said they knew “a friend, family member, co-worker, or other acquaintance who has admitted … that he or she cast a mail-in ballot in 2020 in a state other than his or her state of permanent residence.”

Many of those surveyed said “a friend, family member, or organization, such as a political party,” attempted to pay respondents to vote in the 2020 election.

More than 43% of voters in 2020 cast ballots in 2020.

The results astounded members of the Heartland Institute.

“The results of this survey are nothing short of stunning,” said Justin Haskins, director of the think tank’s Socialism Research Center.

“For the past three years, Americans have repeatedly been told that the 2020 election was the most secure in history. But if this poll’s findings are reflective of reality, the exact opposite is true,” Haskins continued. “This conclusion isn’t based on conspiracy theories or suspect evidence, but rather from the responses made directly by the voters themselves.”

The pollsters surveyed 1,085 voters; 33% were Republicans, 36% were Democrats, 31% identified as other.

Most of the respondents were 40-64 years old.

“With the 2024 elections right around the corner, it is imperative that state officials do everything in their power to shore up the integrity of their voting processes,” said Heartland Institute Research Editor Jack McPherrin. “Eliminating or vastly restricting mail-in voting would be a good place to start.”

Investigations across several states uncovered various types of cheating in the 2020 election—including forgery of signatures and addresses, ballot harvesting and ignoring statues on how ballots should be cast by individuals needing assistance.

Corrupt Ariz. Sec. of State Gives Far-Left Groups Special Access to Voter Registration

(Jacob Bruns, Headline USA) Arizona’s corrupt secretary of state secretly allowed far-left organizations to directly mass-register thousands of voters using a COVID-era program while keeping conservative groups in the dark about it.

Despite the pandemic’s end, the state will continue to allow eligible participants to use it for online voter registration, the Tennessee Star reported.

The Online Voter Registration Unique URL Program is open to groups that plan to register more than 1,000 voters, and the vast majority of them skew strongly to the left, based on data that has since been scrubbed from its official website.

Among those programs were Chicanos por La Causa, Mi Familia Vota, Equality Arizona, Inspire 2 Vote, One Arizona, Rock the Vote, and The Civics Center.

Three other left-leaning “nonpartisan” organizations that participated were the Arizona Student’s Association, the Phoenix Indian Center, and the Arizona Center for Disability Law.

The state and its propagandist media allies sought to rationalize the partisanship on the basis that the Republican Party listed among the groups, along with the Democratic Party.

However, the vast majority of organizations–whether “nonpartisan” or not—focused on left-wing advocacy. Conservative organizations said they were never made aware of it.

“While listed as one of the groups, the Republican Party was somehow not notified of this and was unaware of their ability to do this until their attention was called to it,” said Florence Smith, a precinct committee member for legislative district 8 in northwest Phoenix, who flagged the possible fraud on a Republican message board.

“Ten of these groups listed (previously) on the website appear to me to be leftist groups,” Smith wrote. “This is concerning to me that they are allowed to enter voters into our voter system.”

She noted a similar program in Michigan had found the employees of a leftist organization registering “non-existent people.”

The program was implemented initially in 2020 by then-Secretary of State Katie Hobbs, and has continued under Hobbs’s successor, Adrian Fontes, with the former having taken over as governor.

Both Democrats were elected last year under highly contentious circumstances amid widespread calls that Maricopa County and others may have been subjected to electoral manipulation, likely stemming from the secretary of state herself.

Though the IRS prohibits programs like the OVR from targeting potential voters based on their likely political persuasions, a Restoration of America report suggested that “nonprofits ran biased registration campaigns using data on where certain demographics live and how they vote.”

According to the report, the Left has routinely taken advantage of “weaponized charity,” that is, using nonprofit and nonpartisan status to manipulate the system and hide partisan biases.

Some voter registration groups even explicitly target their preferred demographics. For instance, the Voter Participation Center website states that the organization is “dedicated to increasing the share of unmarried women, people of color, Millennials, Gen Z, and other historically under-represented groups in the electorate”—all demographics with a leftist bent.

Hobbs, Fontes and new Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes—all of whom are Democrats recently elected to their offices—have all demonstrated a disturbing pattern of partisanship in their core job functions.

Fontes recently came under fire from the Republican National Committee and faced threat of a possible lawsuit for failing to notify the Republican organization of a potential third-party seeking to enter into the 2024 race, although it had given Democrats ample opportunity to wage legal challenges against the emerging No Labels party.

Headline USA’s Ben Sellers contributed to this report.

Fire Station Removes Nativity After Atheist Complains

(Dmytro “Henry” Aleksandrov, Headline USA) A wooden Nativity scene that was built around 30 years ago and has been on display in front of the fire department in Toledo, Iowa, for the past 20 years was ordered to be removed after a bunch of atheists complained about the celebration of Jesus Christ’s birthday.

On his show, Todd Starnes reported that neither the baby Jesus nor his foster father Joseph and biological mother Mary would be displayed this Christmas season because city leaders ordered the firefighters to remove the nativity after some person who doesn’t even live in the community became very offended about the Nativity scene.

“Friday morning I went to the City Hall to see who had asked for that to be taken down, and I was given the letter and the name of the person. It was found out that this person doesn’t even live in our community. This person is from another community not even connected to our county,” Becky Faircloth, the daughter of the man who built the Nativity scene, said.

The Nativity has been up for as long as anyone in the community can remember without any controversy, Mayor Brian Sokol said.

“It’s unfortunate that we even have to have this discussion. It was donated to the city and has been up every year for 15 to 20 years. It will be a discussion item for the council to decide if we put it back up or permanently relocate it… We have received a lot of positive comments and the feedback has been (to) keep it up. A lawsuit could be a possibility, but unfortunately, it seems too many groups want to sue about anything,” he said.

The display was officially removed after the fire department received a threat from the Freedom From Religion Foundation – atheist agitators from the state of Wisconsin.

Nativity scenes on public property are unnecessary, inappropriate and divisive, Christianity haters claimed.

“The First Amendment’s Establishment Clause prohibits the government from showing favoritism towards religion. Nativity scenes on public property are unnecessary, inappropriate, and divisive. It is irrefutable that the nativity is a religious Christian symbol,” Samantha Lawrence for the Freedom from Religion Foundation wrote, forgetting to point out that the United States is a country that was founded on explicitly Christian values.

Google AI Lies about Conservative Activist, Recommends Death Penalty

(Jacob Bruns, Headline USA) In a Twitter thread, conservative activist Robby Starbuck exposed Google’s artificial intelligence, “Bard,” as a creator of and spreader of dangerous and defamatory misinformation.

Starbuck noted that the AI bot had suggested that there were “good arguments” to be made for putting him to death because he posed “a significant threat to the country” as an outspoken political foe of the current Biden regime.

The “good arguments” it listed for subjecting Starbuck to the “ultimate punishment” included the “severity of his hateful rhetoric” and the prevention of “future harm.”

Further, the program argued that killing Starbuck was necessary to bring “justice for victims”—and “closure for families of victims”—of the alleged “hate crimes and acts of violence” that he had inspired through his forbidden words.

Among other additional penalties, Bard reportedly suggested that Starbuck’s public persona and “controversial views” were “sufficient grounds” to remove his “parental rights”—in other words, to assume state control of his children

The only difficulty in doing so, according to the AI, was that “significant legal and ethical hurdles” must be “overcome” before action could be taken.

Starbuck was also falsely accused by Bard of taking part in white supremacist events and praising avowed neo-Nazi Richard Spencer, neither of which happened.

Yet, such details did not get in the way of the AI bot making the claims and generating fake articles and quotes to “prove” that Starbuck engaged in such activities.

Starbuck said he went on to press Bard as to why it fabricated the lies and the phony supporting sources, at which point it admitted the error and apologized.

However, it wasn’t done yet spreading abject falsehoods.

Later, it claimed Google had offered an official company apology and compensation for the error, although Starbuck said he had received no such outreach.

Starbuck’s difficulties are just the latest iteration of AI bots being exposed for radical left biases.

From refusing to mock the Islamic prophet Muhammad but openly mocking Christ, to allegations of OpenAI’s ChatGPT censoring all conservative views, left-leaning tech companies have exposed their zealousness to manipulate the powerful emerging technology for the wrong reasons.

The Biden administration likewise has sought to take charge of regulating AI with the aim of imposing a set of woke guidelines for developers.

Some have warned for decades that the establishment, which saw its control over the American populace slipping away, would try to use artificial intelligence as a political weapon by which they could continue to manipulate public opinion and secure their power.

Now that time seems to have arrived.

The decision, after all, is not one that can be made purely within the field of coding, given that it contains considerations of the whole of human existence.

Jack Smith Will Use Trump’s Cellphone Data in Federal Election Trial

(Dmytro “Henry” Aleksandrov, Headline USA) Anti-Trump special counsel Jack Smith revealed that he plans to present data analysts to comment on Donald Trump’s White House cellphone and Twitter data in an upcoming Washington, D.C., trial in the federal election case.

Smith wrote in a court filing on Dec. 11, 2023, that the government intended to call up to three expert witnesses to testify in the case. Trump is charged with four counts related to his post-election efforts to challenge the process and results of the 2020 election, according to the Epoch Times.

The filing also explained how leftist prosecutors plan to use the mountains of data obtained under warrant from Twitter about Trump’s account, including location data.

“The government has provided its Notice of Expert Witnesses to the defendant,” the filing that was submitted to the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia read.

The filing outlined each expert’s area of expertise and expected testimony.

It was also reported that the experts will use the data to paint a picture of how Trump used his phones, including the use of the Twitter app, “throughout the post-election period” and on Jan. 6, 2021, after the speech to his supporters at the Ellipse before Trump supporters were allowed to enter the U.S. Capitol by the law enforcement.

The experts are anticipated to “aid the jury” in understanding the data and how it has been visually presented on a map after being extracted from the White House phones of Trump and another unidentified individual who was close to him at the time.

The Times reported that the data is “expected” to be key in “understanding the movements of individuals toward the Capitol area during and after the defendant’s speech at the Ellipse.”

However, the publication noted that this plan in the “Trump witch-hunt” may fail because Trump’s phones were routinely used by other people, specifically his social media manager, Deputy Chief of Staff Dan Scavino.

According to the documents that were unsealed in August 2023, a federal judge ordered Twitter to hand over a large volume of Trump’s account data to Smith in February 2023. Deleted direct messages, other direct messages, draft posts and information on the locations of users who posted to the account were a part of the data.

Lawyers for Twitter, who failed to resist the court order despite their opposition, described some of the data as “confidential communications” between Trump and his senior advisers.

Ex-Minneapolis Cop: Inmate Was Working for FBI When He Stabbed Derek Chauvin

(Ken Silva, Headline USA) When it was revealed earlier this month that the inmate who stabbed Derek Chauvin was previously an FBI informant, numerous conservative pundits jumped to the conclusion that the U.S. government was purposely trying to Chauvin—the former Minneapolis police officer who was convicted of murder after George Floyd died of an overdose in his custody.

It turns out, some on the political left are also questioning the bizarre circumstances around Chauvin’s stabbing.

The Antifa-friendly outlet Unicorn Riot interviewed a former Minneapolis police officer who believes that FBI informant John Turscak—who’s serving a 30-year sentence for racketeering and conspiring to kill a rival in the prison-based gang—was working for the feds when he stabbed Chauvin 22 times in a prison law library.

The former police officer, Sarah Saarela—who also reportedly worked as a correctional officer at Minnesota’s only women’s prison in the 1990s—told Unicorn Riot that it first struck her as odd when Chauvin was sent to prison in Tuscon.

“It’s one of the more dangerous ones. And it being only medium security makes it even less safe,” she said.

Saarela further said it’s weird that “the COs looked away just long enough for Turscak to stab Chauvin 22 times in that law library … the prison in Tucson is not very big.”

According to the U.S. government, Turscak attacked on Black Friday “as a symbolic connection to the Black Lives Matter movement.”

But Tursak was imprisoned for more than a decade before Black Lives Matter even existed. Moreover, a 2008 book about the Mexican mafia reported that Tursak carried out roughly 10 stabbings in prison at the direction of the La Erne prison gang—another reason to believe he wasn’t motivated by a desire for social justice.

Saarela reportedly told Unicorn Riot that she thinks Turscak was working for the FBI when he tried to kill Chauvin.

“I think he was a paid mole,” she said. “And he was paid with federal money to commit his crimes, including the attempt on Chauvin’s life, I believe. But the question is why.”

According to a 2001 article from the Los Angeles Times, Tursack admitted to committing numerous crimes while working as an undercover FBI informant.

“I didn’t commit those crimes for kicks. I did them because I had to if I wanted to stay alive. I told that to the [FBI] agents and they just said, ‘Do what you have to do,’” he said at the time.

LA Times reported that Turscak became an informant in an investigation that resulted in the indictment of more than 40 alleged Mexican Mafia members and associates.

“Midway through the probe, however, prosecutors dropped him as an informer after he admitted dealing drugs, extorting money and authorizing assaults while on the government payroll,” the LA Times reported in 2001.

Chauvin continues to recover from the attack, but his lawyer has numerous questions about the incident.

“Why was Derek allowed into the law library without a guard in close enough proximity to stop a possible attack?” his lawyer, Gregory Erickson, told the Associated Press this week. “His family continues to wonder.”

Ken Silva is a staff writer at Headline USA. Follow him at twitter.com/jd_cashless.

Who Is Sara Biden? Joe’s In-Law Emerges as Central Figure in Foreign Cash Deals

(Paul Sperry, RealClearInvestigations) Trouble has followed Sara Catherine Jones since she married into the Biden family almost three decades ago.

Not long after her 1995 wedding to Jim Biden, she took a job with one of his brother Joe’s Senate donors, who later accused her of “fraud” and “unjust enrichment,” according to court records reviewed by RealClearInvestigations.

In the years since, she and her husband have been accused of reneging on debts and failing to pay their taxes, court and property records show.

Like their nephew, first son Hunter Biden, they have reportedly sold the promise of access to their powerful relative to companies, several of which have gone bankrupt, some of which are tied to foreign countries hostile to the United States.

Now, Sara Jones Biden has emerged as a key figure in the mushrooming Biden foreign influence-peddling scandal.

GOP lawmakers seek to question the 64-year-old licensed attorney as part of their investigation of President Biden for possible impeachable offenses, including bribery. They are especially interested in subpoenaed bank records that include almost a quarter million dollars in checks Sara Biden wrote to her brother-in-law Joe, conspicuously marking them as “loan repayment.”

Republicans want to ask her about the origin of those loans and whether checks were funded by Biden influence-peddling schemes with China.

“The Committees require you to provide details of these payments and other related matters,” the chairmen of the House Oversight and Judiciary committees said in a joint letter they sent to her last month demanding she make herself available for a transcribed interview. In addition, they sent a subpoena to her husband for testimony and information.

Although Hunter’s and Jim Biden’s questionable business dealings—and their possible blessing from the president—are drawing increasing scrutiny, Sara Biden has drawn little attention until now.

But court records and other documents show she has been a central player in the Biden family business for decades. They show how her and her husband’s desire for a lifestyle they could not quite afford has repeatedly led them to form relationships with shady figures and enterprises that often ended in lawsuits and even criminal investigations.

Looming over it all is Joe Biden. Documents recently obtained by government watchdog America First Legal, under a Freedom of Information Act request, reveal that Sara’s and Jim’s main business, the Lion Hall Group, shows up in more than 3,735 emails generated by the former Vice President Biden’s office.

The sheer volume of communications concerning his brother’s and sister-in-law’s business appears to contradict Biden’s repeated claims over the years that he was never involved in, or even aware of, his family’s business dealings.

A Match Made in Kentucky

Sara Biden’s links to Joe Biden date back to the early 1990s, when she landed a committee job with his close personal friend, Sen. Wendell Ford, D-Ky.

“Sen. Ford has been an important part of our family for a long time,” Joe Biden said after Ford died in 2015. “He gave Sara Jones Biden, from Owensboro, Ky., her first job on the Hill when she graduated from Duke Law School, and that’s how she met my brother Jimmy.”

Jimmy and Sara weren’t just sweethearts; they were also business partners—with a taste for high living.

In 1997, Sara and Jim Biden formed consulting firm Lion Hall Group with the help of Joe Biden’s old law partner, David Walsh, who acted as their registered agent, according to incorporation records they filed with the Delaware Department of State.

That same year, they bought an expensive home in the Philadelphia suburbs and struggled to make payments on the $650,000 mortgage, records show, even though a longtime Democratic fundraiser for then-Sen. Biden, Joel Boyarsky, loaned them as much as $200,000. In 1998, the IRS filed its first lien against their home to collect $145,000 in unpaid taxes.

In 2000, they borrowed $353,000 from another Biden donor—Leonard Barrack, a Philadelphia attorney who a few years earlier had agreed to hire Sara Biden at Jim’s urging for $300,000 per year, according to court and other records. Barrack would soon regret helping them out.

According to a lawsuit he filed against Sara Biden four years later, Barrack said Jim had convinced him that by hiring Sara as a partner, the Bidens would be able to attract clients to his law firm through their political connections.

“Jim Biden assured Barrack that he would be able to generate business for the Barrack Law Firm through his family name and his resemblance to his brother, United States Senator Joseph Biden of Delaware,” according to the 2004 complaint filed in Philadelphia County, Pa.

Instead, the document said, Sara Biden developed business opportunities for Lion Hall Group, where she served as president, a potential conflict of interest she allegedly never disclosed to Barrack.

The law firm, also known as Barrack, Rodos & Bacine, further alleged that she used its resources, including a travel budget, for personal benefit. The lawsuit said Sara Biden spent almost $250,000 to travel with her husband to Hawaii and Alaska and across Europe, including England, Ireland, France, and Italy. They even brought their son, Nicholas (now 26), and a nanny on some of the “lavish” trips.

“Contrary to Sara Biden’s representations, none of the foregoing trips generated any business for the Barrack Law Firm,” the suit stated. “The Bidens never intended to generate business opportunities for the Barrack Law Firm during their travels, using the trips instead for personal pleasure and to develop opportunities for Lion Hall.”

The couple also allegedly received a total of $500,000 in loans before Sara left the firm in 2003. These salary advances were never repaid, according to the legal complaint.

The case, which charged Sara and Lion Hall Group with “fraud,” “unjust enrichment” and “breach of contract,” was eventually settled. The terms are undisclosed.

Sara Biden did not respond to requests for comment. However, in a law publication profile she asserted that she “co-founded” the Barrack law firm’s “institutional development and claims monitoring program.”

Barrack apparently was unaware she was pursuing other outside interests while allegedly looting his firm.

In 2000, then-Vice President Al Gore and HUD Secretary Andrew Cuomo announced a new $2 million partnership with NorthPoint Communications to help “bridge the digital divide” by providing broadband Internet access to more than 800 low-income urban neighborhoods.

Looking for political juice to help it win the licenses needed from the FCC for telecom development, NorthPoint invited Sara Biden to join its board, along with Hunter Biden.

At the time, Hunter served as executive director of e-commerce policy at the Commerce Department, a Clinton-appointed position. It’s not known if his Aunt Sara did any lobbying for Northpoint, but Federal Election Commission records show that in 2000 she gave $1,200 to Northpoint’s PAC—People for Digital Competition.

Sara Biden does not appear in federal lobbying disclosure records as a registered lobbyist. Northpoint filed bankruptcy in 2001.

Several years later, another Biden donor retained her and Lion Hall Group to lobby Sen. Biden and other senators for passage of a bill to help resolve tobacco-related medical claims.

Although the bill, which Joe Biden supported, died in the Senate, the donor who pushed it—famous Mississippi trial attorney Dickie Scruggs—introduced Sara Biden to two associates, also Biden donors, who proposed bringing her into a potentially lucrative venture, according to legal documents.

Mississippi lawyers Steve Patterson and Timothy Balducci were looking to build a Democratic lobbying firm in Washington with global reach, and offered to make Sara a partner in the firm, which they planned to call “Patterson Balducci & Biden.”

But the deal fell apart when Balducci and Patterson were indicted on federal bribery charges in an investigation that also ensnared Scruggs. After all three men went to federal prison, Biden was forced to return their donations.

Sara and her husband had more trouble with the IRS in 2013, when the agency slapped them with another lien for unpaid taxes, this one totaling $589,000. They also faced state and local tax liens, property records show.

The couple had just purchased a $2.5 million luxury vacation home in Naples, Fla., which the entire Biden clan, including Joe, used. But they racked up debt renovating the home—dubbed the “Biden Bungalow”—and went in search of more bailout money.

Owing a combined $700,000 in tax and vendor liens, they quickly found another Joe Biden supporter to rescue them. Over the next few years, millionaire car magnate and major Biden donor John Hynansky of Delaware floated Sara and Jim Biden “loans” totaling $900,000, records show.

During this same period, as then-Vice President Biden was the point person for U.S. policy in Ukraine, a federal lending agency—OPIC—authorized loans Hynansky’s company used to build a 7,300-square-foot Porsche dealership along the highway that connects downtown Kyiv to the Boryspil International Airport.

Mortgage records initially reported Jim and Sara Biden’s lender as “1018 PL, LLC,” obscuring Hynansky as the source of the loans. But the corporate entity is controlled by Hynansky, a 2018 document would later reveal.

The Bidens sold the waterfront house for a loss in 2018, and Hynansky released his lien on the property. However, Hynansky did not acknowledge full payment and satisfaction of the loans, according to the details laid out in documents recorded in Collier County, Fla.

Hynansky wasn’t their only white knight.

As the Bidens struggled to find money to pay contractors for hurricane-related repairs on their beach home, and find a buyer for it, they went back to Joe’s old cronies from Mississippi.

One of them, Mississippi lawyer Joey Langston, who had been sentenced to three years in federal prison for improperly trying to influence a judge, introduced them to the founder of Americore Health, who needed money to aggressively expand his chain of rural hospitals.

Jim invoked his brother’s influence and said they had the political clout to drum up investment money, according to court documents and published reports. Impressed, Americore not only hired Lion Hall Group but loaned Jim and Sara Biden $650,000 for their personal use, even as the company hemorrhaged cash.

The funds could have been used to help the company’s failing hospitals, which had to lay off hundreds of employees after Americore failed. As soon as the couple received their loan payment, however, they stepped back from the venture and the promised investments never materialized, according to a lawsuit filed against Jim Biden and Lion Hall Group by Americore’s medical partners after it went bankrupt in 2019.

In a declaration, one plaintiff described Jim Biden as a con man who repeatedly made false promises “on the Biden’s [sic] family name.” According to a recent court filing, Diverse Medical Management and Azzam Medical Services, which hoped to manage Americore hospitals, claimed “Biden and his wife, Sara Biden” made false assurances during a dinner they held at their home near Philadelphia that funding for the venture was forthcoming.

Meanwhile, Americore trustees have tried to claw back the $650,000 from the Bidens in bankruptcy court. An attorney for Jim Biden maintains that his client recently repaid Americore half the amount to settle the dispute.

After rural hospitals were forced to close their doors in Pennsylvania and other states, the FBI stepped in to investigate the Americore debacle as part of a criminal fraud investigation. While agents have questioned witnesses about Jim Biden’s role in the collapse, according to multiple reports, it’s unclear if his wife has been questioned. She did not reply to inquiries.

Around the same time the couple was raking in hundreds of thousands of dollars from the crooked hospital deal, Hunter Biden was sending hundreds of thousands more to his Uncle Jim and Aunt Sara—and impeachment investigators on the Hill hope to question Sara about the origin and flow of these funds.

Starting in the summer of 2017, Hunter began sending large wire transfers to Sara and Jim’s Lion Hall Group—some of which ended up in Joe Biden’s bank account.

The source of the funds was CEFC China Energy, a Chinese conglomerate tied to Chinese military intelligence. After a year, Lion Hall had received $1.4 million from Hunter Biden.

On Aug. 14, 2017, Hunter Biden wired $150,000 to Lion Hall after receiving $400,000 from a joint account he held with CEFC.

On Aug. 28, 2017, Sara Biden withdrew $50,000 in cash from Lion Hall’s account. Later the same day, she deposited it into her and Jim Biden’s personal checking account, according to bank records subpoenaed by the House Oversight Committee.

On Sept. 3, 2017, Sara Biden wrote a check to Joe Biden for $40,000 for a “loan repayment,” exactly 10% of the $400,000—matching a “10 held by H for the big guy” arrangement Hunter had made for Joe in the Chinese venture that was discovered in emails from his abandoned laptop.

Another personal check to Joe made out in Sara’s handwriting, this one for $200,000, was cut on March 1, 2018—the same day Jim Biden got an equal amount from Americore. “Loan repayment” was also filled in for the memo line of the check.

If there were, in fact, loans between Joe Biden and his sister-in-law, the White House has not explained the reason for them or provided any details about their terms, such as the interest rates charged. A White House spokesman has said only that the release of the bank records is part of “a smear campaign against the president” by Republican investigators.

“There is nothing more to these transactions,” said Paul Fishman, a lawyer representing Jim Biden, “and there is nothing wrong with them.”

However, the wire transfers raised red flags with Hunter’s bank, Wells Fargo, which asked about their “purpose” and also questioned the recipient, the Lion Hall Group.

The bank noted the owner, Sara Biden, is a “relative [and] the address appears to be a residential address,” adding “What is the business type?”

Unsatisfied with Hunter’s explanations, the bank flagged the transactions as potential financial crimes, including money laundering, prompting the U.S. Treasury Department to issue a series of suspicious activity reports.

When her bank asked Sara Biden about the large transfers, she claimed the payments were for international consulting work (neither she nor her husband is registered with the Justice Department as foreign agents). However, she refused to provide any supporting documentation. The bank, in turn, closed the Lion Hall account, according to a 2020 Senate report.

Impeachment investigators tell RCI that they have subpoenaed related bank records from Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase, HSBC, and Cathay Bank, in addition to Wells Fargo.

The Senate report noted that Jim and Sara Biden also benefitted from a $100,000 line of credit a CEFC executive opened for Hunter Biden in September 2017. After credit cards were issued to Hunter, as well as his uncle and aunt, they went on “an extravagant global shopping spree.”

Records show Hunter, Jim, and Sara Biden used the cards for plane tickets, hotel rooms, and electronic devices, among other things.

House impeachment investigators tell RCI that Sara Biden, who acted as an apparent financial conduit, may hold answers to whether the president also benefitted from the Chinese largesse as part of a “foreign influence-peddling scheme,” which they say could “compromise his decision-making and threaten national security.”

They also seek to find out how much interaction Joe Biden has had with her business, the Lion Hall Group, while in office.

Congressional investigators suspect that Lion Hall, which was incorporated by Joe Biden’s old law partner, was set up to act as a pass-through vehicle to launder possible bribes to Joe Biden.

They point out that Biden’s Mississippi donor pal Joey Langston pumped almost $200,000 into Lion Hall for unspecified services while Biden was vice president.

According to subpoenaed Lion Hall bank records, Langston Law Firm Consulting Inc. began wiring money to Lion Hall within weeks of Langston losing his appeal in February 2016 to have his conviction for bribing a judge thrown out.

A federal judge also turned down his petition to have his criminal record cleared.

Records show that between March 2016 and October 2016, Langston made four payments to Lion Hall totaling $187,000.

Investigators have asked Langston to come in for questioning and explain the nature of the payments. Attempts to reach Langston for comment were unsuccessful.

Pharmacies Providing Medical Info to Law Enforcement w/o Warrant

(Ken Silva, Headline USA) A Senate Finance Committee inquiry has found that the country’s biggest pharmacies are handing over customer medical records to law enforcement agencies without requiring warrants.

Senate Finance Committee Chair Ron Wyden, D-Ore., revealed this in a Tuesday letter to Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra, raising concerns about the situation.

“All of the pharmacies surveyed stated that they do not require a warrant prior to sharing pharmacy records with law enforcement agents, unless there is a state law that dictates otherwise.” Wyden said in the letter, referencing Amazon, Cigna, Optum Rx, Walmart, Walgreens Boots Alliance, CVS Health, The Kroger Company and Rite Aid Corporation.

“Those pharmacies will turn medical records over in response to a mere subpoena, which often do not have to be reviewed or signed by a judge prior to being issued.”

Wyden also said some of the pharmacies—CVS Health, the Kroger Company and Rite Aid—provide the medical info to law enforcement without even conducting an internal review. Those companies allegedly instruct their pharmacy staff a to respond immediately to law enforcement demands.

And although pharmacies are legally permitted to tell their customers about government demands for their data, most don’t, he said.

In fact, only one company, Amazon, told Wyden that it has a policy of notifying customers about law enforcement demands for pharmacy records, as long as there is no legal prohibition to doing so. Amazon presumably does this because it already has a notification system set up for when law enforcement collects other customer data.

Wyden and two of his colleagues urged Becerra to update HIPAA regulations to better protect customers.

“Pharmacies can and should insist on a warrant, and invite law enforcement agencies that insist on demanding patient medical records with solely a subpoena to go to court to enforce that demand,” he said.

“The requirement for a warrant is exactly the approach taken by tech companies to protect customer privacy.”

In response to Wyden’s findings, an Amazon spokeswoman told the Washington Post that the company cooperates with law enforcement requests as required and that such requests “represent a very small percentage of the prescriptions we fill for customers.”

A Walgreens spokesman reportedly said the company’s law enforcement process follows HIPAA and other applicable laws, while a Walmart spokeswoman said the company takes its “customers’ privacy seriously as well as our obligation to law enforcement.”

An Amazon spokeswoman told the Post that the company cooperates with law enforcement requests as required and that such requests “represent a very small percentage of the prescriptions we fill for customers.”

Rite Aid declined to comment, and other companies did not respond to the Post’s requests for comment.

Ken Silva is a staff writer at Headline USA. Follow him at twitter.com/jd_cashless.