DeSantis, Massie: Congress has Constitutional Requirement to Stop Funding Border Crisis

(Bethany Blankley, The Center Square) – U.S. Rep. Thomas Massie R-Kentucky and Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis argue Congress has a constitutional duty to stop funding Biden administration policies that they and others argue created the border crisis.

In response to the escalating conflict between the president and 25 Republican governors in a constitutional battle over state sovereignty, Massie said, “Congress has the trump card. We can refuse to fund activity we do not agree with. For instance, in March, when funding expires, we can put a rider in the next bill that says none of the money hereby appropriated can be used to countermand border security measures of the states.”

Agreeing with Massie, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis quoted founding father James Madison from the Federalist No. 58, who wrote, “This power over the purse may, in fact, be regarded as the most complete and effectual weapon with which any constitution can arm the immediate representatives of the people, for obtaining a redress of every grievance, and for carrying into effect every just and salutary measure.”

He also asked, “How many congressmen rail against Biden’s transgressions yet still vote to fund them?”

They echoed a sentiment expressed by Texas border residents who told The Center Square that if Congress continues to use taxpayer dollars to fund policies that facilitate the border crisis, Congress is complicit in creating it and a national security threat.

President Joe Biden has not only demanded that Texas remove its border barriers but has also called on Congress to allocate $13.6 billion to fund “border enforcement and migration management.” This includes hiring more judges and asylum staffers “to expedite the screening process” to release more people into the U.S., White House Communications Director Ben LaBolt said. House Republicans have “refused to take up the President’s supplemental funding request. Actions speak louder than words. It’s time for House Republicans to act,” he said.

Continued funding of current policies only means Congress “is complicit in the invasion,” Kinney County Attorney Brent Smith told The Center Square. Kinney County, a small Texas border community, was the first Texas county to declare an invasion. Three years into the border crisis, 51 Texas counties have declared an invasion; nearly 100 have either issued disaster or invasion declarations, or both, citing the border crisis.

“Congress can stop this invasion right now with the power of the purse,” Smith said. “Our government is funding this invasion with our tax dollars. It needs to stop. We don’t know who is coming in. It only took 19 people to change the world as we know it on 9/11. That’s a fraction of the thousands coming through an hour and we don’t know who they are.

“Congress has the constitutional authority, and most importantly, the responsibility to ensure that federal funding promotes and protects the safety and security of American citizens. Our homeland is more vulnerable today to a terrorist attack because of the ongoing border crisis. And this is preventable.”

Retired FBI directors and national security experts agree, sending a letter to congressional leaders this week warning that the “invasion at the border is perilous for America. In its modern history the U.S. has never suffered an invasion of the homeland, and, yet, one is unfolding now.”

They warned about the likelihood of an imminent but preventable terrorist attack that would likely be committed by one of the estimated millions of mostly single military age men who have been released into the country by the Biden administration.

“It would be difficult to overstate the danger represented by the presence inside our borders of what is comparatively a multi division army of young single adult males from hostile nations and regions whose background, intent, or allegiance is completely unknown,” they wrote.

Speaker of the House Mike Johnson, R-Louisiana, has said the House will not support a funding bill that does not prioritize securing the U.S. borders.

Buttigieg ‘Shocked’ at Blowback after Dubbing Highways as Racists

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) On Friday, Department of Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg declared his shock at the criticism he faced after asserting that highways are racist.

During an interview at Carnegie Mellon University, Buttigieg brought attention to alleged racism in the construction of highways and the implications of being black while driving.

“I’m shocked by how controversial it was when I made reference to the simple fact that a lot of black neighborhoods got wiped out by the way highways were built,” he claimed, acknowledging pushback following repeated racism claims. 

In April 2023, Buttigieg faced scrutiny for reiterating that highways and roads exhibit racist tendencies. “We have a crisis when it comes to roadway fatalities in America, comparable to gun violence: racial disparities,” he claimed at the time. 

“Black and brown — they face a higher probability of losing their lives either while driving or as pedestrians struck by a vehicle. Numerous factors, often rooted in discrimination, contribute to this elevated risk,” he added.

Such claims arose as the Biden administration utilized taxpayer money to fund the promotion of racial “equity” in roads. In 2021, Buttigieg pledged $1 billion to promote racial equity in roads. Specifically, he drew attention to how black communities were affected by the 1950s creation of interstate highways, as reported by the Associated Press. 

During his remarks at Carnegie, Buttigieg asserted that he highlighted so-called racism in road systems to address and improve them. 

“We know we got to get it better than we got it in the ’50s and ’60s,” Buttigieg said on Wednesday. “I didn’t bring that up because want everybody to feel bad about it. I brought it up because we can do something about it, because we have funding to do something about it. The Hill District right here in Pittsburgh is one of thousands of examples around the country, and we can do something about that.” 

Biden Goes Bucks Wild While Repeating Anti-Trump ‘Suckers and Losers’ Hoax

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) On Saturday, a visibly unhinged President Joe Biden addressed a microphone, restating the false claims that former President Donald Trump had referred to fallen soldiers as “suckers and losers.” 

During a speech in South Carolina, where he aimed to appeal to black voters, Biden loudly shouted remarks that Trump, along with 25 other individuals, had long denied.

“Donald Trump—when he was commander-in-chief—refused to visit a cemetery, U.S. Cemetery outside of Paris, for fallen American soldiers, and he referred to those heroes, and I quote, as suckers and losers,” Biden claimed. 

“He actually said that—he said that. How dare he say it like that? How dare he talk about my son… like that? I called them patriots and heroes. The only loser I see is Donald Trump,” Biden reiterated. 

“He makes me angry,” he claimed.

Biden was in South Carolina in preparation for the Democratic primary set to begin on Feb. 23. Democrats skipped the New Hampshire primary, but Biden was declared the winner following write-in votes. 

The infamous phrase tied to Trump first emerged in a piece citing anonymous sources by The Atlantic. 

Reportedly, Trump rejected the idea of visiting the Aisne-Marne American Cemetery in 2018. “Why should I go to that cemetery? It’s filled with losers,” Trump allegedly said.

The then-president vehemently denied making such claims: “It’s a fake story and it’s a disgrace that they’re allowed to do it,” he said, as reported by the New York Times.

“To me, they’re heroes. … It’s even hard to believe how they could do it. And I say that, the level of bravery, and to me, they’re absolute heroes,” Trump added.

Shortly after the report, the Trump White House issued a rebuttal from 25 individuals who rejected such allegations. 

The Washington Post’s infamous Fact-Checker refused to fact-check the letter. It did, however, report that only 14 out of the 25 cited in the letter were with Trump on the France trip. 

“We could hand Pinocchios to Trump for inflating the number, but it’s difficult to settle on a rating without determining how many of the 14 witnesses are truly credible,” The Post’s Glenn Kessler admitted.

Subsequent documentation, released by BuzzFeed, a former media outlet associated with the left, revealed that the trip to the cemetery was canceled due to heavy rain.

Trump Camp Reached Out RFK Jr. for VP Role: ‘Anything’s Possible’

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) Allies of Republican front-runner Donald Trump have reportedly reached out to Robert F. Kennedy Jr., exploring the possibility of inviting him to join the Trump ticket for the 2024 presidential election, according to a New York Post report on Sunday. 

“Trump operatives expressed an interest in Kennedy early on, but it was all premature,” a person told the NY Post. The source alleged that the decision was made “right out of the box when Bobby announced” in 2023. 

“Anything’s possible. I wouldn’t write it off by any means,” the source continued. 

Initially, Kennedy Jr. declared his candidacy for the Democratic nomination but later opted to run as an independent (while maintaining his leftist stance). Despite mounting speculation, he has rejected the notion of joining the Trump ticket as a Republican.

“No, I will not be Donald Trump’s vice president,” he said in 2023.  

Despite this, a donor supporting both Trump and Kennedy Jr. expressed optimism. “It’s very much behind the scenes at this stage. As we progress you might see it bubble up a little bit more,” the donor said, as reported by the NY Post. “Bobby can bring new people to the polls.” 

Former White House Chief Strategist Steve Bannon previously declared that a Trump-Kennedy Jr. ticket would lead to a “landslide” in the 2024 election. 

“If somehow it worked out [that] you could get Kennedy as a running mate — and I don’t know, that is far from even technically can happen because of the structure of the Democratic and Republican parties and ballot access and all that — you could get 60 percent or higher in the country and win a massive landslide,” he said. 

As Trump cements his status as the GOP front-runner and presumed nominee, speculation continues to grow regarding his potential choice for a running mate. 

Rep. Elise Stefanik, R-N.Y., Sens. Tim Scott, R-S.C., and J.D. Vance, R-Ohio, are among the many individuals being named. 

Peter Navarro Decries DOJ Verdict: ‘Death Sentence at My Age’

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) Peter Navarro, the former director of the Office of Trade and Manufacturing Policy under the Trump administration, referred to his sentence for refusing to comply with a subpoena from the Jan. 6 Committee as “effectively a death sentence.” 

Navarro made these remarks during an interview with Fox News’ Sean Hannity on Friday, where he expressed that being prosecuted for an obscure crime marked “not a good day for America.” 

He was sentenced to four months in federal prison after refusing to comply with the anti-Trump Jan. 6 Committee. At the time, Navarro cited executive privilege and separation of powers as his main reasons for not testifying. The Democrat-led House of Representatives passed a contempt of Congress charge and referred the matter to the DOJ, which set a grand jury, leading to an indictment. 

“I am the first senior white house advisor ever to be charged in this alleged crime,” Navarro told Hannity. “I want folks to know they can come after me and come after Trump and come after you.”

Navarro pledged to appeal the sentence. However, he alleged that the DOJ is attempting to force him to serve time before he proceeds with the appeals.

“They even want to put me in prison before I can have my appeal in this case,” he added. “They want Trump in prison and out of the Oval Office and they want folks like me not to be able to help him out.”  

Navarro referred to the average life expectancy of 77 years, asserting that his sentence amounted to a death sentence. 

“Four months in prison at my age is effectively a death sentence if you look at the average lifespan in America,” he added. “This to me is why you’ve got to let Donald Trump in 2024 and get him into the oval. … Our economy is in shambles. The border is in shambles. Our enemies are upon us.” 

He concluded: “What I want is justice for the American people. I want Trump in the white house, not in prison. I want my case to go to the Supreme Court and settle good law on one of the most important constitutional issues.” 

Navarro became the second Trump official to be convicted and sentenced for not complying with a congressional subpoena. Former White House Chief Strategist Steve Bannon was sentenced to four months after the DOJ prosecuted the charge. Bannon is currently appealing the decision. 

Blackburn Opposes Hidden Border Deal: ‘Open Border’ Is Biden’s Policy

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) Sen. Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn., declared she will not support the border deal currently concealed by Senate negotiators. The text of an infamous border bill allegedly would provide visas for illegal aliens.

“We haven’t seen any text or language about the deal,” Blackburn said during an interview with Fox News’ Fox & Friends Weekend on Saturday. “I’ve been very, very solid in my response: I will vote for negative that makes illegal, legal — and the Biden administration tries every day to make it illegal immigration, legal.”

Blackburn’s remarks follow widespread criticism aimed at a potential border bill that would reportedly increase green cards by 50,000 a year and allow some illegal aliens to obtain working visas. The bill would also allow the intake of 5,000 illegal aliens per day.

“This is another way they’re saying they want us to say, ‘It’s okay for 5,000 people to come;’ ‘It’s okay for us to close our borders some days of the year,’” Blackburn said of the contentious bill. “We are the United States of America. If we want to close our border, we close our border. We should be closing our border.” 

The Tennessee senator highlighted President Joe Biden’s refusal to close the southern border despite an unprecedented influx of illegal aliens. 

“An ‘open border’ is his immigration policy,” she said of Biden, accusing Democrats of seeking to increase their population in exchange for congressional seats. “They’re needing to get people into these blue cities because people are fleeing blue cities and blue states and they’re moving to places like Tennessee and so for the census, they need to bulk up their numbers.”

An infamous video of Rep. Yvette Clarke, D-N.Y., captured her calling for illegal aliens to come into their district for “re-districting” purposes. “I’m from Brooklyn, New York — we have a diaspora that can absorb a significant number of these migrants,” Clarke claimed.  

“When I hear colleagues talk about, ‘The doors of the inn being closed,’ ‘No room at the inn;’ I’m saying I need more people in my district just for redistricting purposes. And those members could clearly fit here!” she added.

The border bill—currently under negotiation by Sens. James Lankford, R-Okla., Kyrsten Sinema, I-Ariz.; and Chris Murphy, D-Conn.—has received condemnation from House Republicans, with House Speaker Mike Johnston declaring it “dead on arrival.”

Tim Scott Rebukes ‘Vile and Disgusting’ Attacks for Endorsing Trump

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) Sen. Tim Scott, R-S.C., strongly criticized the “vile and disgusting” attacks directed at him following his endorsement of former President Donald Trump in the Republican primary. 

Political pundits and some critics on social media have accused Scott — a black man — of “sucking” up to Trump and compared his endorsement to the “great emasculation,” potentially referencing the “Great Emancipator” phrase associated with Abraham Lincoln and the liberation of the slaves.

But Scott made it clear he was fed up with the attacks in an interview with Fox News’ Sean Hannity on Friday: “The most racists in the country are liberals,” Scott declared.

“The bigotry that comes from the far, radical left is just normal these days. Why? Because they’re just not trying to attack me; they are trying to make sure any other minority will think for themselves and consider the GOP. They want to send a message to every single one of them: ‘Step out of line and we’ll attack you too,’” he added.

Scott, a former presidential candidate, endorsed Trump, the GOP front-runner on Jan. 20. “We need a president who will close our southern border today,” Scott said during a New Hampshire speech. “We need Donald Trump.” 

The endorsement dealt a blow to Nikki Haley, the former U.N. ambassador and former South Carolina governor, who had close ties to Scott. Notably, Haley appointed Scott as a senator in 2012. Since the endorsement, Scott has emerged as a potential running mate if Trump, the presumed nominee, secures the Republican nomination. 

While on Hannity, Scott called on minority voters to back Trump to “make America the greatest nation.” He specifically said: “To every single African American, Hispanic, millennial—anybody in the majority population or minority population—if you believe in conservatism, stand up and be counted.”

He continued, “If you want to make America the greatest nation on God’s great earth, step into the fire because we have to save this nation,” Scott continued. 

Hannity pointed out that Scott is being considered as a potential running mate for the 2024 ticket, presumably alongside Trump or Haley.

“You are going to be on anybody’s shortlist to be potential vice president of our country. … Is this the means of just trying to intimidate you, threaten you or maybe threatened by you,” Hannity asked. To which Scott replied: “They’re certainly threatened by me and threatened by people like me.”

Scott added, “Here is what they refuse to say. They refuse to say the truth: under Joe Biden, crime in devastated neighborhoods, crime in impoverished neighborhoods, crime in black neighborhoods has skyrocketed.”

Schools Establish Elaborate Spying Systems to Catch Students Vaping

(Headline USA) Aaliyah Iglesias, like thousands of other students around the country, was caught vaping in a bathroom by surveillance equipment that schools have installed to crack down on electronic cigarettes, often without informing students.

Schools nationwide have invested millions of dollars in the monitoring technology, including federal COVID-19 emergency relief money.

E-cigarettes have inundated middle and high schools. The devices can dispense vapor containing higher concentrations of nicotine than tobacco cigarettes. Millions of minors report vaping despite efforts to limit sales to kids by raising the legal age to 21 and ban flavored products preferred by teenagers.

Some districts pair the sensors with surveillance cameras. When activated by a vaping sensor, those cameras can capture every student leaving the bathroom.

It can surprise students that schools even have such technology. Iglesias, who graduated in May from Tyler High School in Tyler, Texas, first learned it had sensors after an administrator came into a restroom as students started vaping.

“I was in awe,” Iglesias said. The administrator tried to figure out who was involved but ultimately let all the students go.

The episode that got her in trouble happened elsewhere in Texas, at Athens High School, where her debate team was competing last February. Iglesias went into a bathroom to vape. Later that day, her coach told her she had been caught.

At least 90 students in Tyler have faced misdemeanor or felony charges.

The Tyler district declined to comment on the disciplinary actions, saying in a written statement that tracking of vape usage addresses a problem that is hurting children’s health.

“The vape detectors have been efficient in detecting when students are vaping, allowing us to address the issue immediately,” the school system said.

A leading provider, HALO Smart Sensors, sells 90% to 95% of its sensors to schools. The sensors don’t have cameras or record audio but can detect increases in noise in a school bathroom and send a text alert to school officials, said Rick Cadiz, vice president of sales and marketing for IPVideo, the maker of the HALO sensors.

The sensors are marketed primarily for detecting vape smoke or THC but also can monitor for sounds such as gunshots or keywords indicating possible bullying.

During the COVID panic, HALO noted on its website that monitoring indoor air quality was an approved use for federal COVID relief money.

“With the HALO Smart Sensor, you can combat COVID-19 in your schools and create a safe work and learning environment, while also reaping the benefits of vape detection, security monitoring, and more,” the company said.

The sensors do not always work as administrators hope.

At San Dieguito Union High School District in California, the vape smoke was so thick in bathrooms some students found it unbearable. In a pilot program, the district installed vape sensors in bathrooms and cameras outside the doors.

“In a way it was too successful,” said Michael Allman, a district board member who explained the sensors went off so frequently that administrators felt it was useless to review security footage each time.

On social media, students around the country describe ways to outsmart the sensors. Some report covering them in plastic wrap. Others say they blow the smoke into their clothes.

At the Coppell Independent School District in Texas, sensors are part of a prevention strategy that includes educational videos and a tip line. Students can receive $50 for reporting vaping by peers and “they were turning each other in right and left,” said Jennifer Villines, the district’s director of student and staff services.
As George Orwell once quipped, “Big Brother is watching you.”

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

No Kiss and Tell? Fani Willis Refuses to Turn Over Docs Tied to Sex Affair

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) The embattled district attorney for Fulton County, Fani Willis, has declined to provide documents related to special prosecutor Nathan Wade to the House Judiciary Committee, currently investigating conflicts of interest arising from an affair between Willis and Wade. The infamous duo is prosecuting former President Donald Trump over efforts to challenge the Georgia election results in 2020. 

In a letter dated Jan. 26 and addressed to House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, Willis cited alleged “well-recognized confidentiality interests” as the primary reason for her non-cooperation with the Jan. 12 letter requesting documents tied to Wade. 

“As I said previously, your requests implicate significant, well-recognized confidentiality interests related to an ongoing criminal matter,” Willis asserted. “Your requests violate principles of separation of powers and federalism, as well as respect for the legal protections provided to attorney work product in ongoing litigation.” 

Willis had previously rebuffed requests to turn over documents regarding her prosecution of Trump, along with 18 other co-defendants, including some former federal employees. “I refer you to my previous responses to your inquiry for more detailed analysis,” she told Jordan in the letter, first reported by the New York Post.

Jordan’s Jan. 12 letter was prompted by accusations that Wade—hired by Willis at the expense of Georgia taxpayers—took several lavish vacation trips with Willis, reportedly funded by the proceeds from prosecuting Trump, potentially violating ethics rules and state laws. 

“According to a recent court filing, you have been paid more than $650,000—at the rate of $250 per hour—to serve as an ‘Attorney Consultant’ and later a ‘Special Assistant District Attorney’ in the unprecedented investigation and prosecution of the former President and other former federal officials,” Jordan wrote.

“This filing also alleges that while receiving a substantial amount of money from Fulton County, you spent extravagantly on lavish vacations with your boss, Ms. Willis,” he added.

The affair between Wade and Willis was initially disclosed by Michael Roman, one of the 18 Trump co-defendants in the case. Roman petitioned a state judge to disqualify Willis from the case and dismiss the prosecution, thus jeopardizing other the other criminal cases, including Trump’s. 

Wade and Willis’s love affair has also surfaced in the divorce proceedings of Wade and his wife, Joycelyn Wade, who is seeking monetary support. Wade allegedly concealed his income from the Fulton County investigation into Trump. Willis has rejected compliance with a subpoena request in the divorce case. However, a judge ruled that Willis could be compelled to comply later. 

FTC Investigating Big Tech’s Partnerships with AI Firms

(Headline USA) U.S. antitrust enforcers are opening an inquiry into the relationships between leading artificial intelligence startups such as ChatGPT-maker OpenAI and the tech giants that have invested billions of dollars into them.

The action targets Amazon, Google and Microsoft and their sway over the generative AI boom that’s fueled demand for chatbots such as ChatGPT, and other AI tools that can produce novel imagery and sound.

“We’re scrutinizing whether these ties enable dominant firms to exert undue influence or gain privileged access in ways that could undermine fair competition,” said Lina Khan, chair of the U.S. Federal Trade Commission, in opening remarks at a Thursday AI forum.

Khan said the market inquiry would review “the investments and partnerships being formed between AI developers and major cloud service providers.”

The FTC said Thursday it issued “compulsory orders” to five companies — cloud providers Amazon, Google and Microsoft, and AI startups Anthropic and OpenAI — requiring them to provide information about their agreements and the decision-making around them.

Microsoft’s years-long relationship with OpenAI is the best known. Google and Amazon have more recently made multibillion-dollar deals with Anthropic, another San Francisco-based AI startup formed by former leaders at OpenAI.

Google welcomed the FTC inquiry in a statement Thursday that also took a not-so-veiled dig at Microsoft’s OpenAI relationship and its history of inviting antitrust scrutiny over its business practices.

“We hope the FTC’s study will shine a bright light on companies that don’t offer the openness of Google Cloud or have a long history of locking-in customers – and who are bringing that same approach to AI services,” Google’s statement said.

Microsoft’s Rimy Alaily, a corporate vice president for competition and market regulation, also said the company looks forward to cooperating with the FTC and defended such partnerships as “promoting competition and accelerating innovation.”

Amazon, Anthropic and OpenAI declined comment.

The European Union and the United Kingdom have already signaled that they’re scrutinizing Microsoft’s OpenAI investments. The EU’s executive branch said this month the partnership might trigger an investigation under regulations covering mergers and acquisitions that would harm competition in the 27-nation bloc. Britain’s antitrust watchdog opened a similar review in December.

Antitrust advocates welcomed the actions from both the FTC and Europe on deals that some have derided as quasi-mergers.

“Big Tech firms know they can’t buy the top A.I. companies, so instead they are finding ways of exerting influence without formally calling it an acquisition,” said a written statement from Matt Stoller, director of research at the American Economic Liberties Project.

Microsoft has never publicly disclosed the total dollar amount of its investment in OpenAI, which Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella has described as a “complicated thing.”

“We have a significant investment,” he said on a November podcast hosted by tech journalist Kara Swisher. “It sort of comes in the form of not just dollars, but it comes in the form of compute and what have you.”

OpenAI’s governance and its relationship with Microsoft came into question last year after the startup’s board of directors suddenly fired CEO Sam Altman, who was then swiftly reinstated, in turmoil that made world headlines. A weekend of behind-the-scenes maneuvers and a threatened mass exodus of employees championed by Nadella and other Microsoft leaders helped stabilize the startup and led to the resignation of most of its previous board.

The new arrangement gave Microsoft a nonvoting board seat, though “we definitely don’t have control,” Nadella said at Davos. Part of the complications that led to Altman’s temporary ouster centered around the startup’s unusual governance structure. OpenAI started out as a nonprofit research institute dedicated to the safe development of futuristic forms of AI. It’s still governed as a nonprofit, though most of its staff works for the for-profit arm it formed several years later.

Microsoft made its first $1 billion investment in San Francisco-based OpenAI in 2019, more than two years before the startup introduced ChatGPT and sparked worldwide fascination with AI advancements.

As part of the deal, the Redmond, Washington software giant would supply computing power needed to train AI large language models on huge troves of human-written texts and other media. In turn, Microsoft would get exclusive rights to much of what OpenAI built, enabling the technology to be infused into a variety of Microsoft products.

Nadella in January compared it to a number of longstanding Microsoft commercial partnerships, such as with chipmaker Intel. Microsoft and OpenAI “are two different companies, answerable to two sets of different stakeholders with different interests,” he told a Bloomberg reporter at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland.

“So we build the compute. They then use the compute to do the training. We then take that, put it into products. And so in some sense it’s a partnership that is based on each of us really reinforcing what … each other does and then ultimately being competitive in the marketplace.”

The FTC has signaled for nearly a year that it is working to track and stop illegal behavior in the use and development of AI tools. Khan said in April that the U.S. government would “not hesitate to crack down” on harmful business practices involving AI. One target of popular concern is the use of AI-generated voices and imagery to turbocharge fraud and phone scams.

But increasingly, Khan made clear that what deserved scrutiny was not just harmful applications but the broader consolidation of market power into a handful of AI leaders who could use this “market tipping moment” to lock in their dominance.

The FTC’s three commissioners, all Democrats because two seats are vacant, voted unanimously to start the inquiry. Commissioner Alvaro Bedoya said it should “shed some light on the competitive dynamics in play with some of these most advanced models.”

The companies have 45 days to provide information to the FTC that includes their partnership agreements and the strategic rationale behind them. They’re also being asked for information about decision-making around product releases and the key resources and services needed to build AI systems.

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press