Wokesters Accuse Retiring WEF Mastermind Klaus Schwab of Toxic Workplace

Luis Cornelio
-
0
Wokesters Accuse Retiring WEF Mastermind Klaus Schwab of Toxic Workplace

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) Sexual harassment and an unhealthy workplace culture are among the serious allegations facing the World Economic Forum (WEF) in a new report. 

At the center of these accusations is Klaus Schwab, the globalist organization’s founder, who announced his departure in May. 

The Wall Street Journal report, published Saturday, details claims from six women who allege they were ousted or targeted when they became pregnant.  

Schwab is also accused of telling a board member that former WEF executive Barbara Erskine needed to lose weight. 

Several women reported facing sexual harassment from their superiors, many of whom still work at the WEF.  

Two women alleged that “VIPs” at WEF forums sexually harassed them years ago—and Schwab himself is accused of making suggestive remarks to three women. 

“I knew he liked me and I knew he found me pretty,” said Myriam Boussina, who worked as Schwab’s personal assistant in the 1990s. “Every man with a lot of power, they think that they can get any woman and they are not ashamed.” 

The Journal also reported racial discrimination claims from Black employees, including the use of racial slurs and one employee being passed over for a promotion. 

Despite the WEF’s leftist stance on gender equality and inclusion, former WEF Executive Cheryl Martin highlighted the hypocrisy between the organization’s aspirations and its internal acts. 

“That was the most disappointing thing, to see the distance between what the Forum aspires to and what happens behind the scenes,” former WEF Executive Cheryl Martin told the outlet. She is a former U.S. Energy Department official. 

In one instance, Schwab allegedly wanted a group of 50-year-old employees fired due to their age. When an executive refused, Schwab fired him instead. Another case involved Schwab firing a woman who had become pregnant after being hired for a leadership position. 

WEF spokesman Yann Zopf disputed the accusations, claiming the Journal’s reporting would “mischaracterize our organization, culture and colleagues, including our founder.” 

Tellingly, Schwab declined to be interviewed for the report. 

Trump’s Odds of Beating Biden Now Close to 72%

Dmytro "Henry" Aleksandrov
-
0
Trump’s Odds of Beating Biden Now Close to 72%

(Dmytro “Henry” Aleksandrov, Headline USA) Pollster Nate Silver, the founder of ABC’s FiveThirtyEight, said that there will be “some further decline” in Joe Biden’s poll numbers, considering that postdebate surveys are published in the days and even weeks ahead.

Silver’s “2024 Silver Bulletin presidential election forecast” tipped slightly in Donald Trump’s favor on the evening of July 1, 2024, after the first batch of postdebate polls were released. In his latest update, the pollster said that the results proved to be “mostly poor for Joe Biden.”

In Silver’s model’s national polling average, Trump leads Biden by 2.7%. Biden’s win probability dropped to 28%, down from 35% on debate night, per the forecast. Silver added that he thinks that polls would not radically change.

“Our guess is that more likely than not, there’s some further decline ahead: the model is trying to figure out whether this is random noise, but instead it’s almost certainly caused by a challenging first debate for Biden. It’s not great news for [Biden],” he wrote.

Silver also posted a model on the same day, showing that Trump now has a 71.9% chance of winning the election. Biden, on the other hand, dropped from 34.7% to 27.6%.

The Decision Desk HQ’s national polling average stated that Trump and Biden remain neck and neck, with Trump leading by 0.9%, according to The Hill.

A recent poll by Harvard CAPS Harris also showed that Trump was heavily favored to win the election after soaring by 6% after the head-to-head.

Many Trump-hating leftists were not very glad about the recent news, Blaze Media reported.

“I’m going to go home tonight, kiss my kid and wife goodnight, pour a stiff drink and have a quiet cry,” anti-Trump political strategist Mike Murphy said.

The results of the polls came after Biden’s disastrous performance during last week’s debate that caused panic among many Democrats, resulting in people suggesting that Biden should be replaced with someone else who is not so old and senile.

Since then, the Biden campaign and the White House tried to calm fellow leftists down by reassuring them that it would be better to keep Biden in the race.

GOP Lawmakers Review Footage of J6 Political Prisoner Attacked by Guard in DC Gulag

Dmytro "Henry" Aleksandrov
-
0
GOP Lawmakers Review Footage of J6 Political Prisoner Attacked by Guard in DC Gulag

(Dmytro “Henry” Aleksandrov, Headline USA) A bodycam footage that was obtained by the House Judiciary Committee purportedly confirms that an employee with the D.C. Central Detention Facility (DOC) pepper-sprayed a Jan. 6, 2021, prisoner in the face twice in less than a few minutes for not wearing a COVID-19 mask.

The abuse of power happened on Sept. 5, 2022, American Greatness reported. The incident was one among many allegations of abuse against the political prisoners at the facility.

The news source reported that former DOC employee Lt. Crystal Lancaster sprayed Ronald McAbee with the chemical munitions after he removed his face mask and refused to comply with her tyrannical coronavirus lockdown order.

The footage hasn’t been released, but the Judiciary Committee said in a Monday letter that they were allowed to view it. According to the committee members, the incident was as bad as McAbee alleged.

“The footage, which we viewed on June 12, 2024, showed that on September 5, 2022, an altercation occurred between McAbee and Lancaster that resulted in the discharge of chemical munitions in McAbee’s face. The video shows several inmates, including McAbee, not complying with the facility’s mask mandates or the lockdown order that Lancaster had issued,” Rep. Troy Nehls, R-Texas, and Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, said in a Monday letter.

McAbee filed a federal excessive-force lawsuit last month against Lancaster for the attack, in which he said he removed his face mask to take oral medication.

“Defendant Lancaster knowingly, maliciously and sadistically administered the chemical agent directly to Mr. McAbee’s face from less than four feet away. [After the chemical attack, jail staff] placed him in a shower with only very hot water, which amplified the burning sensation of the chemical spray. Mr. McAbee was not provided an opportunity to decontaminate thoroughly,” the lawsuit said.

The suit then added that McAbee was “placed in solitary confinement for three days, still with no opportunity to decontaminate himself despite multiple requests.” After that, the chemical agent reactivated and caused McAbee intense burning pain.

“[McAbee suffers] continued physical and emotional trauma nearly two years later,” the lawsuit said.

The lawsuit also alleged that “[the government] used Defendant Lancaster’s attack against Mr. McAbee to argue for an increased sentence for Mr. McAbee” because McAbee had “an altercation with jail personnel while awaiting trial.”

In May of this year, the Committee launched an investigation into the assault. In addition to that, Rep. Troy E. Nehls, R-Texas, a member of the Committee, has been repeatedly requesting bodycam footage and documents from the DC facility regarding the attack.

A DOC representative also informed Nehls, his staff and committee staff that the agency’s policy requires inmates to receive fresh clothes after being sprayed with chemical munitions.

“However, McAbee has informed Representative Nehls that he was not given fresh clothes after the altercation. Rather he was given the same clothes he was wearing at the time of the altercation. This is a serious allegation, as Oleoresin capsicum (OC) sprays continue to stick to clothing and skin after use,” the congressman wrote.

AOC Plots Impeachment Revenge against Supreme Court Justices

Contributing Author
-
0
AOC Plots Impeachment Revenge against Supreme Court Justices

(Headline USA) Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., announced on Monday that she would file articles of impeachment against several Supreme Court justices after the bench issued a ruling granting partial immunity to former President Donald Trump.

“Today’s ruling represents an assault on American democracy. It is up to Congress to defend our nation from this authoritarian capture,” she wrote on X. “I intend on filing articles of impeachment upon our return.”

She did not specify which justices she would target with impeachment articles. But she has been vocally critical of justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito, both of whom have been targeted by leftist activists for alleged ethics violations. 

Last year, for example, Ocasio-Cortez claimed Thomas should be impeached for taking trips with a Republican donor.

“I believe that we should pursue the course [of impeachment],” she said at the time. “And if it is Republicans that decide to protect those who are breaking the law, then they are the ones who then are responsible for that decision. But we should not be complicit in that.”

The Supreme Court’s ruling in Trump v. U.S. found that Trump can claim “absolute” presidential immunity from prosecution for “actions within his conclusive and preclusive constitutional authority” and “presumptive immunity” for other “official” acts while in office, but not for “unofficial” acts outside of office.

It then tossed the matter to the lower courts to determine which acts qualify as “official” or “unofficial.”

Ocasio-Cortez is not the only Democrat to melt down over the Supreme Court’s ruling. 

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., also argued the ruling “sets a dangerous precedent” and vowed to lead “aggressive oversight and legislative activity with respect to the Supreme Court to ensure that the extreme, far-right justices in the majority are brought into compliance with the Constitution.” 

Rep. Zoe Lofgren, D-Calif., who was one of the impeachment managers in the House’s failed attempt to convict Trump of plotting an insurrection, appeared to herself advocate for an insurrection against the judiciary.

She falsely suggested that the decision authorized President Joe Biden to use the military to “take out” the conservative justices—a clear violation of the U.S. Constitution’s separation of powers.

The Biden administration previously caught flak after reports surfaced that Attorney General Merrick Garland had authorized the assassination of Trump during the FBI’s dubious October 2022 raid on Mar-a-Lago as part of its efforts to score points ahead of the midterm elections.

Several other prominent Democrat thought-leaders have also floated similarly dangerous suggestions, including social-media influencer Harry Sisson, whose call for Biden to assassinate Trump following the “presidential immunity” decision may have prompted the 21-year-old TikToker to be investigated by the Secret Service.

RFK Conveniently Hit w/ Sex Assault Claims as Dems Seek Biden Replacement

Luis Cornelio
-
0
RFK Conveniently Hit w/ Sex Assault Claims as Dems Seek Biden Replacement

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) Independent presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is facing disturbing accusations of sexual assault and animal cruelty, according to Vanity Fair. 

The outlet claimed that Kennedy Jr. sexually assaulted his children’s babysitter, Eliza Cooney, in the late 1990s. Additionally, the magazine reported that the environmentalist attorney may have eaten a cooked dog.

“My back was to the door of the pantry, and he came up behind me,” Cooney told the magazine, recalling the purported sexual assault. “I was frozen. Shocked.”

Cooney refused to pursue civil charges against Kennedy Jr. and only chose to expose her story because of Kennedy Jr.’s candidacy.

The allegations come as the Democratic Party is informally seeking a viable alternative to President Joe Biden following his humiliating performance in a recent presidential debate with former President Donald Trump. 

The claims are likely to further tarnish Kennedy Jr.’s already controversial reputation within the Democratic Party, which has criticized him as a vaccine skeptic and conspiracy theorist. 

Despite the attacks, Kennedy Jr.’s policies, along with his vice presidential nominee, suggest that he is not too far from Biden in terms of leftist ideology. 

In response to the allegations in an interview on the Breaking Points podcast, Kennedy Jr. said he was “not a church boy” and admitted to having a “rambunctious youth.” 

He added, “I have so many skeletons in my closet that if they all vote, I could run for king of the world. This Vanity Fair article is recycling 30-year-old stories.” 

Kennedy Jr. has been frequently in the news cycle after unsuccessfully seeking the Democratic nomination for president in the 2024 election. He has since left the party and is now running as an Independent. 

Biden, the presumed nominee, is facing mounting calls to quit the race amid concerns that if he stays, former President Donald Trump would have an easy path back to the White House. 

Biden Donors Demand Money Back as Campaign Attacks Critics

Dmytro "Henry" Aleksandrov
-
0
Biden Donors Demand Money Back as Campaign Attacks Critics

(Dmytro “Henry” Aleksandrov, Headline USA) People involved in Joe Biden’s presidential campaign defended him by accusing suddenly critical mass media of “election interference” after the propagandists started questioning whether Biden could survive another four years in the White House.

The Biden campaign also attacked angry Democratic donors who demanded a refund of their money after witnessing Biden’s disastrous performance, the Independent reported.

In response, Biden campaign chair Jennifer O’Malley Dillon dismissed the reasonable concerns that Biden is too old to run for reelection during a Zoom call with hundreds of upset party donors on Monday, CNN reported.

“He’s probably in better health than most of us,” Dillon said.

One of the participants during the meeting criticized O’Malley Dillon by saying that her comment was “offensive” and “dismissive.”

Another participant said that it was “disappointing” that the campaign would continue to downplay their concerns.

In addition to dismissing their donors’ valid concerns, the Biden caretakers also attacked propaganda outlets that suddenly started saying that Biden should leave the race because he is too old and senile, even though not so long ago they were doing everything possible to present Biden in the best way possible.

Joe Biden’s campaign accused the Atlanta Journal-Constitution’s editorial board of “undue influence” over the presidential election after it published a piece titled, “It’s time for Biden to pass the torch,” the Post Millennial reported.

“This wasn’t a bad night. It was confirmation of the worst fears of some of Biden’s most ardent supporters. Biden deserves a better exit in public life than the one he endured when he shuffled off the stage on Thursday night,” the board wrote.

Former Atlanta Mayor Keisha Lance Bottoms and a current Biden’s senior advisor said that she was “very disappointed with the Atlanta Journal-Constitution” after they published the anti-Biden op-ed.

“We have talked about making sure we’re protecting elections and making sure there’s no undue influence. This was undue influence by the Atlanta Journal-Constitution or an attempt to influence,” Bottoms said.

“Editorial boards are supposed to honor fair elections,” she continued. “I don’t think it’s fair when an editorial board with ten people sitting in a room are trying to influence an election, especially in a state like Georgia where there’s already been discussions about influencing elections.

Biden Allies May Formally Nominate Him a Month Early to Stave Off Challengers

Contributing Author
-
0
Biden Allies May Formally Nominate Him a Month Early to Stave Off Challengers

(Headline USA) President Joe Biden’s allies are pushing to nominate him several weeks before the formal Democratic National Committee convention to ward off any potential challengers, according to Bloomberg.

The DNC is reportedly looking to hold a virtual vote on July 21, just a few days after the convention’s credential committee meets to formalize the rules and procedures for the week-long event. 

They had already planned on nominating Biden electronically prior to the in-person vote at the convention, which starts Aug. 19 in Chicago. But their timeline has now moved forward significantly in light of recent demands for Biden to step aside from the 2024 ticket.

A CBS News poll this week found that nearly half of Democratic voters want Biden to step aside and not accept the party’s nomination.

Several prominent Democrats, including liberal comedian Bill Maher and Democratic strategist James Carville, have also urged the DNC to ditch Biden and hold an open convention to replace him.

And on Tuesday, the first elected Democrat called for Biden to step down for the sake of down-ballot candidates.

“President Biden has continued to run substantially behind Democratic senators in key states and in most polls has trailed Donald Trump,” said Rep. Lloyd Doggett, D-Texas, said.

“I had hoped that the debate would provide some momentum to change that. It did not,” he added. “… Our overriding consideration must be who has the best hope of saving our democracy from an authoritarian takeover by a criminal and his gang.”

However, so far Biden has dismissed calls for him to drop out.

“I know I’m not a young man, to state the obvious,” Biden told supporters at a rally in North Carolina last week. “I don’t walk as easily as I used to. I don’t talk as smoothly as I used to. I don’t debate as well as I used to. But I know what I do know. I know how to tell the truth. I know right from wrong, and I know how to do this job.”

Psaki Admits Biden Was Bad in Debate, Blasts His Family for Trying to Blame Staff

Contributing Author
-
0
Psaki Admits Biden Was Bad in Debate, Blasts His Family for Trying to Blame Staff

(Headline USA) Former White House press secretary Jen Psaki admitted this week that President Joe Biden’s debate performance was “bad,” and rebuffed attempts by the Biden family to blame the spectacle on his debate prep team.

“There are a lot of important discussions and debates about this political moment we are in and the path forward, but the notion that the issue at the debate was the prep process done by people like @RonaldKlain and Anita Dunn who have successfully prepped many candidates including Obama, Clinton and Biden is absurd,” Psaki wrote on X.

“It was a bad debate … Biden was bad,” she added. “Important convos about what happens next. But if you are directing your ire at ‘prep’ you are not talking about the right things.”

Psaki’s comments come days after a report revealed Biden’s family, including first lady Jill Biden and Hunter Biden, have been pressuring the president to ax some of his top staffers, including senior adviser Anita Dunn and Bob Bauer, the president’s attorney.

According to Politico, the Bidens complained that Dunn, Bauer, and the other staffers involved with the president’s debate prep did not adequately prepare him to go on the attack more or lay out his vision for the next four years, and that they allowed him to become overworked without enough rest beforehand. (Biden was away at Camp David for an entire week prepping for the debate).

However, Biden campaign spokesperson Kevin Munoz dismissed the report and said Biden has no intention of resetting his campaign staff.

“The aides who prepped the president have been with him for years, often decades, seeing him through victories and challenges,” Munoz said. “He maintains strong confidence in them.”

During the Biden family’s recent meeting, they also reportedly encouraged the president to ignore calls from within the Democratic Party for him to step aside and urged him to stay in the race.

Despite Months of Denouncing Leftist Excess, Bill Maher Backs Radical Biden Alternative

Contributing Author
-
0
Despite Months of Denouncing Leftist Excess, Bill Maher Backs Radical Biden Alternative

(Headline USA) Liberal comedian Bill Maher called for an open Democratic convention this week following President Joe Biden’s disastrous debate performance, and even threw his support behind one of the suspected alternatives to Biden: California Gov. Gavin Newsom.

In a guest essay for the New York Times, Maher argued it has become impossible to “ignore the obvious” about Biden’s mental decline.

“I think we’ve babied Joe Biden enough,” he wrote.

But “what happened at the debate last week wasn’t a tragedy, it was a blessing in disguise,” Maher continued.

Despite the fact that Biden already has secured the pledged delegates needed to be Democrats’ nominee for president, Maher suggested disregarding the will of voters and letting candidates duke it out to win the favor of elite superdelegates who will then decide amongst themselves the best person to lead the nation.

“Let’s move the plotline forward,” Maher said. “Democrats could not buy, with all of George Soros’s money, the enthusiasm, engagement and interest they would get from having an open convention—and in Chicago no less, famous for Democratic convention drama.”

The late-night comedian admitted his pick would be Newsom.

“Watching him make the case against Mr. Trump in the pre-debate interviews, and defend Mr. Biden post-debate, reminded me: This guy is good at this,” Maher wrote.

“Yes, he has too much ‘California baggage’—some of which I myself don’t love—but the contrast to how he prosecutes the case against Mr. Trump and how Mr. Biden did couldn’t be clearer,” added the Real Time host.

Maher’s endorsement of Newsom is at odds with much of his recent, seemingly red-pilled commentary bashing the far Left. For example, Maher has been extremely critical of Democrat-driven COVID policies, yet Newsom enacted some of the most stringent lockdown policies in the nation while routinely flouting them himself.

However, Maher at times has reminded viewers of how radical he can be. In April, he admitted abortion was murder, but said he was “OK” with that reality.

“I’m just OK with that. I am. I mean there are 8 billion people in the world. I’m sorry, we won’t miss you. That’s my position on that,” he said.

Merchan Delays Trump Sentencing in Porn-Star Trial Till September

Ben Sellers
-
0
Merchan Delays Trump Sentencing in Porn-Star Trial Till September

(Ben Sellers, Headline USA) Judge Juan Merchan rescheduled the sentencing in former President Donald Trump’s porn-star case until Sept. 18 after the U.S. Supreme Court issued a ruling in Trump’s favor saying he was protected by “presidential immunity” for many of the actions he took during his first term as president.

With the presumptive GOP nominee’s odds of winning the November election at an all-time high following last week’s debate—and a string of legal victories to bolster him in his lawfare battles—the convicted felon has begun looking more like the once and future president.

Democrats appeared fractured and in disarray as to whether they had the will and ability to attempt to oust a defiant President Joe Biden, whom many now consider utterly unfit to lead the country.

On Monday, the Supreme Court cleared the path for Trump, ruling that his political rivals could not prosecute him for actions he took while president to investigate vote fraud during the 2020 race if he were acting in his official capacity as president by doing so.

The case now goes back to the D.C. District Court, where Judge Tanya Chutkan is unlikely to see any sort of forward motion on a trial before the November election.

A Trump victory would likely end the federal lawfare effort altogether, as he would appoint an attorney general who would fire special counsel Jack Smith and withdraw any pending Justice Department cases against the president.

Likewise, Trump’s attorney say the high court’s ruling in Trump v. U.S. determined that the prosecution team in Manhattan violated the U.S. Constitution by using actions Trump took in an official capacity as president to make their dubious case against him.

Specifically, they referred to checks he signed while serving as president and a meeting Trump held with his former attorney—turned star prosecution witness—Michael Cohen at the White House, according to NBC News.

Trump’s attorneys promptly filed a motion to overturn his recent conviction and sought to brief Merchan on the implications of the new Supreme Court decision.

“The verdicts in this case violate the presidential immunity doctrine and create grave risks of ‘an Executive Branch that cannibalizes itself,'” defense attorney Todd Blanche wrote,” according to ABC News. “After further briefing on these… it will be manifest that the trial result cannot stand.”

Attorneys in the office of Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg signaled that they had no objections to the motion.

They noted that the request to file their papers by July 10 was “necessarily a request to adjourn the sentencing hearing” scheduled for the following day, during which Merchan was to decide whether to send Trump to prison or offer one in a range of lesser punishments more befitting the crime.

“Although we believe the defendant’s arguments to be without merit, we do not oppose his request for leave to file and his putative request to adjourn sentencing pending determination of his motion,” they wrote.

The prosecutors further requested a date two weeks after the motion to file a response.

Ben Sellers is the editor of Headline USA. Follow him at twitter.com/realbensellers.

1...1,2091,2101,211...3,857Page 1,210 of 3,857