Retribution? Biden Admin Hands $6.6B to Elon Musk Rival in Last Days in Office

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) The Biden administration announced Tuesday a $6.6 billion loan extension to Rivian, an electric vehicle manufacturer and notable rival of Tesla, the car company owned by Elon Musk. 

The announcement comes less than a month after President-elect Donald Trump tapped Musk to lead the soon-to-be-launched Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), a Trump project aimed at eliminating wasteful government programs. 

The $6.6 billion loan is earmarked for constructing a $5 billion electric car factory in Georgia. Rivian initially launched the project but paused it due to financial strains, the New York Post reported Wednesday. 

Vivek Ramaswamy, DOGE’s co-head, criticized the multi-billion-dollar loan in a post on X, accusing the Biden administration of approving the grant in a bid to hurt Musk. 

“Biden is forking over $6.6 billion to EV-maker Rivian to build a Georgia plant they’ve already halted,” Ramaswamy wrote.  

Ramaswamy argued the loan’s justification—that it will create 7,500—made little sense, as each job would cost taxpayers $880,000. He called this “insane.”

“This smells more like a political shot across the bow at @elonmusk & @Tesla,” Ramaswamy added.

In contrast, Rivian founder and CEO RJ Scaringe praised the loan, claiming in a press statement that it would “strengthen U.S. leadership in EV manufacturing and technology.” 

Scaringe continued, “This loan would enable Rivian to more aggressively scale our U.S. manufacturing footprint for our competitively priced R2 and R3 vehicles that emphasize both capability and affordability. 

He claimed that a “robust ecosystem of U.S. companies developing and manufacturing EVs is critical for the U.S. to maintain its long-term leadership in transportation.” 

Rivian shares rose 15 percent following the loan’s announcement, the Post noted. Notably, Rivian is an EV start-up backed by leftist billionaire George Soros.

The vehicle manufacturing company was initially valued at $150 billion but has since fallen to just $10 billion.

Woah: Whoopi Goldberg Defends Trump, Shuts Down Co-Host’s Fearmongering

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) The View co-host Whoopi Goldberg issued a rare defense of President-elect Donald Trump, pushing back against co-host Ana Navarro’s fearmongering about his incoming term. 

Goldberg suggested Monday that her co-hosts “wait and see” how Trump acts in his second term before embracing what co-host Alyssa Farah described as an “apocalyptic” view of the president-elect. 

“I think what we’re all saying is we’re going to sit and watch. We’re going to wait and see because we can’t do anything else,” Goldberg said of Trump. 

Navarro, a former self-described Republican, responded with false claims against Trump: “I’m not going to wait and see. I mean, this guy told us he’s for retribution, [that] he’s going to be a dictator.” 

Goldberg jumped in and asked Navarro, “What are you going to do? There’s nothing to be done until you know what you’re fighting. Pissing on the wind doesn’t help. You just get a wet face.” 

Navarro dismissed Goldberg’s argument, gesturing as she said, “I have no false expectations that at 78, he’s going to all of the sudden turn into a … human being.” 

“I spent weeks telling people that he was apocalyptic. I’m not going to change now because it’s still the same man … I think that’s when we lose credibility,” Navarro continued. 

Goldberg had the last word, pushing back against Navarro’s accusations, which were rooted in opinion rather than facts. 

“You lose credibility in many different ways,” Goldberg said. “If you don’t know what you’re talking about, and you accuse him of something, then they’re going to blow it back. That’s why I say, ‘We need to wait and see exactly what you’re going to do.’” 

Goldberg added, “You better know what your back game is going to be before you talk about what you’re going to do until you know what you can do.” 

Goldberg’s comments come less than a month after Trump decisively won the 2024 presidential election against Vice President Kamala Harris. 

Trump’s victory occurred despite baseless accusations that he posed a threat to democracy and that his election would mean the end of America as we know it. 

Trump has repeatedly stated that his only “revenge” once in office is achieving success for the country—a stark contrast to the apocalyptic depictions by the legacy media, including the hosts of The View. 

Scott Pressler Delivers Masterclass Rebuke of CNN During Hit-Piece

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) CNN attempted to smear Republican activist Scott Presler during an interview, branding him as “controversial” and an “election denier,” but Presler pushed back, turning the tables on the leftist network.

The interview aired on Monday’s episode of CNN’s OutFront with leftist host Erin Burnett, part of the network’s analysis of how President-elect Donald Trump won Pennsylvania. 

CNN correspondent Elle Reeves centered her questions on election denialism and potential violence. “I noticed that when you urge people to action, you often include the word ‘peacefully.’ Is that to avoid another Jan. 6th-type incident?” Reeves asked Presler. 

Presler swiftly replied, “With all due respect, it’s to avoid people like you guys saying that I’m anything but. My motto is to just be super cute, have my data and facts, treat everyone with love and respect, and as you can see an army of people will follow.” 

Reeves shifted focus to Presler’s early activism against radical Islam. 

“Pressler first got attention in 2017 when he worked for an anti-Muslim group and organized marches against Sharia despite there being no Sharia law in America,” Reeves stated in a voiceover. She then asked him about his shift. 

Presler replied affirming that his approach to politics has grown. “I see my work and my evolution in politics as I laid a foundation,” he said. “And now I am meticulously building on that and esoteric understanding of how politics is going to win elections, focusing on demographic groups, get them registered get them mobilized, get them out to vote.” 

When the segment ended, Burnett asked Reeves, “Why are Republicans keeping him at some sort of arm’s length?” 

Reeves responded that Presler “does have his conservative critics” and referenced negative media reports about him. 

Reeves added, “Politico reported that years earlier, in 2016, he’d had a sexual encounter in a Republican office in Virginia and posted photos of it on Craigslist and then of course, he is an election denier, but the era of those folks being pushed to the fringe of the party seems to have passed.” 

The interview has since gone viral, with Presler responding, “How is registering voters ‘controversial’? I must be doing something right.” 

‘Defund the Police’ Activist Allegedly Misused Donations for Lavish Lifestyle

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) The D.C. Attorney General’s Office sued a vocal proponent of the Defund the Police movement for allegedly misusing donations to his nonprofit to fund a lavish lifestyle, including a Cancun getaway and shopping sprees. 

Attorney General Brian L. Schwalb alleged Monday that activist Brandon Anderson violated D.C.’s nonprofit and workers’ rights laws by exploiting funds from Raheem AI, a tax-exempt, anti-police nonprofit he founded. 

Anderson, a prominent activist and supporter of the Black Lives Matter and Defund the Police movements, has lectured at MIT, where he once argued that “defunding the police is an important next step for the country.”

Schwalb implicated the nonprofit’s board of directors, accusing them of allowing Anderson to commit violations and failing to ensure payment to the organization’s sole employee. 

“Not only did their financial abuses violate fundamental principles of nonprofit governance, but Anderson and Raheem AI failed to pay their employee the wages they had earned,” Schwalb said in a press release. 

He added, “My office will not allow people to masquerade behind noble causes while violating the law, cheating taxpayers, or stealing from their workers.” 

According to the lawsuit, filed in the District of Columbia Superior Court, Anderson diverted $75,000 for personal use, spending over $40,000 on a luxury vacation rental service offering stays in high-end mansions and penthouses. 

He allegedly spent $10,000 on Airbnb rentals, including a Cancun resort, $10,000 on designer clothing and $5,000 on emergency veterinary expenses. 

Anderson also violated D.C.’s personnel mandates, which require nonprofits to maintain both a president and a treasurer to manage operations and finances. 

Raheem AI has not had a treasurer since 2020, and the board of directors failed to implement measures to rein in the organization’s finances, including what Schwalb described as “Anderson’s corruption.” 

Raheem AI deputy director Jasmine Banks flagged Anderson’s misconduct to the board, which placed him on leave in April 2024. Banks continued working for the nonprofit but has not received wages for their work. 

According to the lawsuit, Anderson forced the employee to sign a non-compete agreement, violating D.C. law that bans such clauses for contracts under $150,000. 

The D.C. lawsuit followed an investigation by the leftist New York Times.

DeWine Signs Ohio Bathroom Bill into Law

(J.D. Davidson, The Center Square) Schools in Ohio are required to have single-sex bathrooms and locker rooms after Gov. Mike DeWine signed the state’s bathroom bill into law Wednesday.

The bill, folded into a law that revamped the state’s College Credit Plus Program by Republicans, requires multi-occupancy restrooms, locker rooms, changing rooms and overnight accommodations used by multiple students to be designated only for either male or female students.

DeWine announced the signing without comment Wednesday, but House Republican sponsors said school leaders and parents across Ohio wanted the change in law.

“We are thankful that individuals will not have to worry about members of the opposite sex coming into restrooms, locker rooms, and changing rooms in Ohio,” said Rep. Adam Bird, R-New Richmond. “Thank you, Governor DeWine, for signing this important legislation and keeping students safe.”

The bill cleared the Senate earlier this month.

Originally House Bill 183, the bathroom ban bill became part of Senate Bill 104 on the House floor, which was passed before lawmakers recessed earlier this summer. SB104 originally made changes to the Ohio College Credit Plus program.

Sen. Minority Leader Nickie Antonio, D-Lakewood, said the bill is destined for litigation.

“There is a whole lot of other stuff we could be working on right now, but this is the one. Is this really what we need to be spending our time doing?” Antonio said on the Senate floor. “It’s not really about the bathrooms. It’s about demonizing people. We are telling our children there are people who are less than. They are not the same. They are not allowed to behave like the rest of us. That is a terrible bill.”

MURDOCK: Poor Planning Puts House GOP’s Majority in Major Jeopardy

0

(Deroy Murdock, Headline USA) Thanksgiving is upon us and, three weeks after Election Day, America STILL does not know the makeup of the incoming U.S. House.

Pathetic!

As of Tuesday at 11:22 p.m., the Associated Press reports, Republicans have won 219 seats to the Democrats’ 213.

At this writing, three seats remain uncalled:

  • Democrat Adam Gray inched past Republican Congressman John Duarte by 182 votes in California’s 13th District, with 99% of ballots tallied. (For God’s sake, after 22 days, where the hell are those other votes?) Duarte led Gray by 207 votes as late as Tuesday afternoon, with 98% of ballots counted. Another 1% of votes turned up, and—Bang! Zoom!—the Democrat suddenly is on top. Here we go again.
  • In CA-45, Democrat Derek Tran is 613 votes ahead of GOP Congresswoman Michelle Steel.
  • Iowa’s First District finds Congresswoman Mariannette Miller–Meeks edging Democrat Christina Bohannan by 800 votes. (Miller–Meeks declared victory late Wednesday following the conclusiong of an official recount. –ed.)

If these margins hold, the new House should include 215 Democrats, 220 Republicans, and a three-seat GOP majority.

But wait!

Florida Republican Matt Gaetz just ditched his seat after abandoning his nomination for U.S. attorney general.

And fellow Florida Republican Mike Waltz will depart on Jan. 20 to become President Donald J. Trump’s national security adviser.

These exits have triggered Jan. 28 primaries and April 1 general elections. They also shrink the expected Republican conference to 218 seats.

It gets worse:

Congresswoman Elise Stefanik, R-N.Y., is Trump’s choice for United Nations ambassador. Assuming a quick Senate confirmation, she would leave the House and commence diplomacy on Jan. 21.

Remaining GOP seats: 217.

Kathy “The Hack” Hochul—New York’s hapless, colorless Democrat governor—is in no rush to comfort Republicans. She likely will maximize GOP anxiety by scheduling the latest-possible special election, 90 days hence: Tuesday, April 22.

If everything goes smoothly, the Republican House must govern between Inauguration Day and April Fools’ Day with 217 seats and three vacancies. If all 215 Democrats stay united, Republicans must vote unanimously, lest they drop beneath the (216 + 1 =) 217 votes needed to pass anything.

This will turn every decision—from adopting budgets to approving each day’s Congressional Record—into a Hitchcockian thriller. If just one Republican oversleeps, gets sick, or endures flight delays, major legislation could crash and burn.

Any single Republican could hijack the entire House until securing whatever ransom bought his cooperation.

Republicans also could squander “safe” special elections to fill these vacancies. For a cautionary tale, recall how then-Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., left in 2017 to become Trump’s first attorney general. His seat, in a stalwart-Republican state, was a lock. And then hints and allegations emerged about GOP nominee Roy Moore’s unusual habit of courting females as young as 14.

“I don’t remember ever dating any girl without the permission of her mother,” Moore assured Fox News host Sean Hannity. Suitably appalled voters sent liberal Democrat Doug Jones to the Senate—from Alabama!

Consider another hazard:

House Speaker Mike Johnson’s surprisingly weak leadership has earned the scorn of GOP representatives Thomas Massie of Kentucky and Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia. Add one vote to their Nays and Gaetz’s absence, and the Louisiana Republican could lack the votes to re-gain the speakership.

If so, the House would drift like a ghost ship for days or even weeks until a new captain arises. Meanwhile, Trump’s America First legislative agenda would bob aimlessly among the waves.

It would help if Gaetz reconsidered and took his seat. He should chair a Select Committee on Federal Injustice to detail DOJ’s long train of abuses and usurpations.

Thus, Gaetz could mitigate, by one seat, this entire fine mess left by Congressman Richard Hudson, R-N.C., and the National Republican Congressional Committee. They should have secured a victory commensurate with Trump’s sweeping triumph— not to mention Senate Republicans’ 100% re-election of incumbents and conquest of four Democrat seats.

Hudson and the NRCC failed Trump and Republicans nationwide by botching an excellent opportunity to win a robust working House majority.

Trump and Senate Republicans romped. Hudson and the NRCC barely survived. Forthcoming details of their incompetence and pettiness will expose them as this Thanksgiving’s biggest turkeys.

​Deroy Murdock is a Manhattan-based Fox News Contributor.

Illegal Immigrants Less Likely to Commit Crime? Guess Again

(John R. Lott Jr., RealClearInvestigations) In June, Victor Martinez–Hernandez was charged with the murder of Rachel Morin, a mother of five in Maryland.

Police in Oklahoma tracked the accused repeat offender down with a sample of his DNA recovered from a Los Angeles home invasion in which a 9-year-old girl and her mother were assaulted.

Police say Martinez–Hernandez came to the U.S. illegally in December 2022 to escape prosecution for at least one other murder in his native El Salvador.

“That should never have been allowed to happen,” said Sheriff Jeffrey Gahler, referring to the numerous missed red flags the case presented. His office apprehended Hernandez in Tulsa, Oklahoma.

Like the member of the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua who was sentenced to life in prison last week for the murder of Laken Riley in Georgia, Hernandez’s case is shining a light on the federal government’s failure to properly vet and keep track of lawless immigrants.

These gaps have led to broad claims among open-borders advocates that illegals have less involvement with the criminal-justice system than native-born Americans.

A review of the available data, however, shows that the criminal records of millions of illegal aliens—the ones President-elect Donald Trump vows to prioritize for deportation—remain unknown due to illegal crossings, lax enforcement, and lax data-collection by federal and “sanctuary” jurisdictions.

In addition, an analysis of the available statistics by RealClearInvestigations suggests that the crime rate of noncitizens is vastly understated.

A separate RCI analysis based on estimates developed by the U.S. Department of Justice’s National Institute of Justice suggests that crime by illegal aliens who entered the U.S. by July 21, 2024 cost the country some $166.5 billion. These criminals disproportionately entered the U.S. during the Biden administration.

The problem begins with incomplete initial vetting by the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

The criminal histories of immigrants from far-flung countries with often shoddy record-keeping are somewhat hard to determine. It is also impractical to hold each person until they have passed a rigorous background check. As a result, ICE routinely releases many illegals into the country on their own recognizance and then discovers afterward that many had criminal records in their home countries.

In response to a request from U.S. Rep. Tony Gonzales, R-Texas, ICE reported this summer that it has released 7.4 million such “non-detained” noncitizens into the U.S. during the last four decades or so.

ICE reports that these include 662,566 noncitizens with criminal histories—435,719 individuals with criminal convictions in their home countries and another 226,847 with pending criminal charges.

These precise figures, however, do not say whether the crimes of the latter group were committed in the accused’s home country or the U.S.

In the July 21 letter to Rep. Gonzales, ICE reported that 13,099 of these non-detained individuals have convictions for homicide, with 1,845 facing criminal homicide charges.

Another 9,461 have convictions for sex offenses (not including assault or commercialized sex), and 2,659 face pending charges.

The convictions include other violent crimes such as assault (62,231), robbery (10,031), sexual assault (15,811), weapons offenses (13,423) and dangerous drugs (56,533).

These figures are merely suggestive of the extent of crime because they only list the most serious crime committed by each individual. A murderer, for example, who also committed a sex offense, is only counted as a murderer.

It does not include the fact that millions of illegal immigrants are violating the law because of their presence in the U.S. It also does not account for the lawbreaking involved in working without proper authorization or the widespread use of stolen Social Security numbers to secure employment.

The 662,566 convicted and likely criminals make up 9% of the 7.4 million released noncitizens.

The statistics miss much of the relationship between crime and illegal aliens. Noncitizens in the “national docket data” either surrendered to border agents or were apprehended at the border. Those who avoid surrender likely have reasons to evade authorities, such as a criminal background.

But there are others who avoided being caught and won’t be in these numbers. That group includes “gotaways”—individuals observed crossing the U.S. border illegally but not apprehended or turned back.

With up to 38% of border agents shifted from monitoring to processing duties and 30% of surveillance cameras not functioning, millions more likely entered the U.S. undetected, potentially including the most dangerous individuals.

U.S. Customs and Border Protection estimates that some 2 million such “gotaways” have entered the country since 2021.

The data on illegal immigrants who have been processed also understates the problem. Criminals rarely commit just one crime. For example, from 1990 to 2002, in the 75 most populous U.S. counties, 70% of those convicted of a violent felony had a prior arrest, and 56% had a prior criminal conviction.

In 2023, in Washington, D.C., the average homicide suspect had been arrested 11 times before committing a homicide. Data for 30 states showed that 60.1% of criminals released from prison in 2005 had been arrested again within two years, and 73.5% had been arrested within four years. The ICE data set provides a single entry for each individual.

Most violent crimes don’t result in an arrest, so looking at arrests or convictions in these other countries will underestimate whether illegal aliens are criminals. Across all U.S. cities in 2022, only 35.2% of violent crimes resulted in an arrest.

While 50.6% of murders resulted in an arrest, just 24.1% of rapes produced an arrest, 22.7% of robberies, and 39.9% of aggravated assaults.

As the Laken Riley and Rachel Morin murder cases make clear, it is difficult to calculate all the victimization costs of crime to families and society.

Using tools developed by the National Institute of Justice, RCI did estimate what is likely the bare minimum economic costs of illegal alien crime. It arrived at its estimated cost to victims in dollar terms by assuming that each of the 662,566 “non-detained” noncitizen offenders on ICE’s list committed just once in the U.S. the crime for which they have been previously accused.

ICE presented Rep. Gonzales with numbers on 42 different types of crime, but the NIJ only calculated the cost to victims for eight types of crime.

Professor Mark Cohen at Vanderbilt University, who co-authored the original NIJ report, updated the list with 15 of the crime categories reported by ICE: murder, sexual assault, sexual offenses, robbery, assault, arson, burglary, larceny, motor vehicle theft, weapon offenses, drugs, fraud, liquor offenses, gambling, and stolen property.

Cohen’s updated numbers provide estimates for the damage from child abuse, drunk driving, and vandalism, but ICE did not collect numbers on those crimes.

NIJ’s estimated losses from crime victimization include: medical care/ambulances, mental health care, police/fire service costs, social/victim services, property loss/damage, reduced productivity (at work, home, and school), and nonmonetary losses (fear, pain, suffering, and lost quality of life).

Murders account for almost $153.8 billion of the $166.5 billion in estimated criminal victimization costs (a breakdown of the costs of crime for each type of crime is available here). Another $6 billion involves sexual assaults/offenses, and an additional $5.2 billion comes from sexual assaults and sexual offenses.

Half of the crimes these non-detained individuals commit don’t have cost estimates. These crimes include kidnapping, embezzlement, extortion, smuggling, traffic offenses, and weapon offenses.

These criminal illegal aliens entered the U.S. under multiple administrations, but the size of the problem was likely larger under the Biden administration.

That isn’t just because so many more illegal aliens were entering the country. Under the Trump administration’s remain-in-Mexico policy, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services performed background checks on immigrants. That included contacting immigrants’ countries of origin.

ICE agents cannot access the same databases to check on the immigrants, and they don’t contact the immigrant’s home country. Plus, the massive inflow of immigrants has overwhelmed the system.

The deputy director for ICE blames the “enormous workload” agents face, so they haven’t been able to do even the limited background checks they are doing. There are so many coming in that the government can’t house these immigrants until their backgrounds are properly checked.

ICE has been processing criminals as they enter the country, but without identifying them as criminals. So, under the Biden administration, they have simply been released into the country. Now, they are walking freely in the United States, and no one knows where they are.

As bad as these numbers are, the reality may be even worse. The Biden–Harris administration is accused of presenting the border crisis so that it does not look as bad as it is.

In mid-September, retired San Diego Border Patrol Chief Aaron Heitk testified how the Biden administration ordered him not to publicize the arrests of illegal border crossers who they identified as having terrorist ties.

The American Immigration Council, which strongly opposes Trump’s deportation policies, estimates that it could cost $88 billion to deport 1 million illegal immigrants. But if we accept its estimate and ignore the various government benefits that these individuals might be receiving, ICE’s number of 662,556 illegal criminal immigrants implies a cost of $58.3 billion to remove them—just over one-third of the conservative estimate given here of the cost of the crimes by these criminals.

The estimate of over $160 billion in costs from criminal illegal aliens is very likely an underestimate of the true costs. It assumes the average criminal coming into the country commits only one offense similar to what he committed in his home country. We are also not counting the costs of half of criminal illegal aliens.

Bronze Statue of Trump Is Being Constructed to Capture Iconic ‘Fight Fight Fight’ Image

(Maire Clayton, Headline USA) Crypto investors commissioned a two-story bronze statue of President-elect Donald Trump, which captures his now-iconic fist in air after the July assassination attempt in Butler, Pennsylvania, according to Breitbart.

Ohio artist Alan Cottrill was tapped to create the statue of the soon to be 47th president.

The artist told the outlet while he has created hundreds of other sculptures, Trump’s was the most ambitious.

“The Patriot Statue of Donald J. Trump was our largest and most controversial undertaking,” Cottrill added, “especially considering the scale and relevance of the event in Butler that took place.”

Conservative Strategist Dustin Stockton was also involved with the project.

Stockton told Breitbart he anticipated the statue will be completed by the New Year and have planned a year-long tour for the statue, stopping in different areas of the country.

He added he hoped the statue will make its way to Butler and eventually Trump’s Presidential Library.

“It’s been one hell of a ride the last decade; the PATRIOT project, statue, and tour is our way of claiming how these incredible times are remembered by history,” Stockton told the outlet.

Stockton already enquired about the possibility of having the statue where the assassination attempt took place.

The Breitbart article said he previously spoke with the Butler County Board of  Commissioner Vice Chair Kim Geyer about the potential of having the statue displayed.

Geyer said the fair grounds are private property and the decision rests with the board of directors.

However, Geyer thought it could be possible.

“Prior to it possibly going to the Trump Presidential Library in the future, I think it would be an appropriate place because we already have visitors who do come to frequent the location because they want to see where this event took place that occurred on July 13,” she told Breitbart.

The project was dubbed $PATRIOT. The site explained the statue is “commemorating the sacrifices [Donald Trump’s] made to preserve the fabric of American society.”

Trump Gets Last Laugh: Appoints Man ‘Mr.’ Fauci Tried to Destroy as NIH Head

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) President-elect Donald Trump has selected none other than Dr. Jay Bhattacharya to be the next director of the National Institutes of Health, dealing a major blow to the government bureaucrats behind draconian COVID-19 lockdowns. 

Dr. Bhattacharya is a professor of Health Policy at Stanford University and a co-author of the 2020 Great Barrington Declaration, an open letter criticizing pandemic-era lockdowns. 

Dr. Bhattacharya faced opposition and personal attacks by “Mr.” Anthony Fauci, who demanded “a quick and devastating take down” of the Great Barrington Declaration, according to FOIA emails. 

Fauci was the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, one of the 27 centers within the NIH, which Dr. Bhattacharya will now oversee. 

Trump said Tuesday that Dr. Bhattacharya will work with Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the nominee for Health and Human Services to make “important discoveries” that will improve health and save lives. 

“Together, Jay and RFK Jr. will restore the NIH to a gold standard of medical research as they examine the underlying causes of, and solutions to, America’s biggest health challenges, including our crisis of chronic illness and disease,” Trump wrote via Truth Social. “Together, they will work hard to Make America Healthy Again!” 

In response to Trump’s appointment, Dr. Bhattacharya said he was “honored and humbled” and pledged to reform “American scientific institutions so that they are worthy of trust again and will deploy the fruits of excellent science to make America healthy again!” 

In addition to being a Stanford professor, Dr. Bhattacharya is a research associate at the National Bureau of Economic Research and a senior fellow affiliated with the Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research, Stanford Freeman Spogli Institute and Hoover Institute. 

He also leads the Stanford Center for Demography and Economics of Health and Aging. His peer-reviewed research has been published in several journals, and he holds an MD and PhD in economics from Stanford, as Trump noted in his press statement.

Ariz. Lawmakers Introduce Bill to Resolve Longstanding Delays in Election Results

(Kyle Becker, Headline USA) The Arizona state legislature brought forward draft legislation Tuesday of a bill that seeks to speed up the state’s notoriously slow election process.

The bill, dubbed “Make Arizona’s Results Faster,” was introdued by GOP state Sen. J.D. Mesnard for consideration in the next legislative session.

As written, it would make a number of minor improvements to election integrity and accelerate the ballot-counting process at the margins. However, it would not undertake drastic changes, such as going to all-paper ballots to be submitted by voters on Election Day.

One of the reasons cited for Arizona’s arduous and unwieldy tabulation process is voters’ heavy reliance on absentee and mail-in ballots.

The bill seeks to reform the early voting process and assuage other concerns about election integrity in five key ways:

  • Early Ballot Requests and Identification: Electors can request early ballots within 93 days before an election. Early voting sites require voters to present identification before receiving a ballot.
  • Handling and Submission of Early Ballots: ONLY the voter may possess their early ballot. Early ballots must received no later than specific deadlines. Counties must establish secure drop boxes for verified and unverified ballots.
  • Signature Verification and Curing Process: Election officials must verify signatures against voter registration records. The “curing” period for inconsistent or missing signatures extends up to five business days after a federal election.
  • Civil Penalties for Violations: Organizations must submit completed early ballot request forms to the appropriate election office. Knowingly withholding forms or mishandling ballots may result in fines or felony charges.
  • On-Site Tabulation and Updated Election Processes: On-site tabulation of early ballots must follow strict chain-of-custody and identification verification requirements. Election officials must maintain publically accessible logs.

Despite keeping intact an extended post-election ballot-curing period, which might continue to delay the official reporting of results on election night, the bill garnered praise for trying to address a problem that has fueled widespread allegations of election meddling in Maricopa County and elsewhere over the past three election cycles.

Garrett Archer, a self-described “data guru” at Phoenix’s ABC 15, quipped that the bill might even be renamed “Make Arizona Elections Like Florida.”

Three days after Election Day, Maricopa County still had half-a-million ballots to count, according to Phoenix’s Fox 10.

On the other hand, Florida counted nearly all of its approximately 10 million votes on Election Day, according to the Associated Press.

The Sunshine State was ground zero for the disastrous 2000 election, under then-Gov. Jeb Bush, that eventually sent his brother, George W. Bush, to the White House. But under current Gov. Ron DeSantis, it appears to have learned a valuable lesson from its hanging-chad fiasco.

“Florida’s election system is geared toward quick and efficient tabulation,” said the AP.

“… Florida’s deadlines are set to avoid having ballots arrive any later than when officials press ‘go’ on the tabulator machines,” it added. “The state has a receipt deadline for its absentee ballots, which means ballots that do not arrive by 7 p.m. local time on Election Day are not counted, regardless of when they were mailed.”

Kyle Becker is a former writer and associate producer for Fox News’s Hannity. He was also the director of viral media at  IJReview. Follow him at x.com/kylenabecker or visit thekylebecker.com.