Starbucks Closes Its Iconic Seattle Location Due to Crime

(Dmytro “Henry” Aleksandrov, Headline USA) Starbucks decided to close one of its well-known locations, near Pike Place Market in Seattle, because of the high crime rates.

Starbucks told KOMO News on Tuesday that it is closing its location at the corner of 1st and Pike, across the street from the popular market.

“As a standard course of business, we regularly evaluate our store portfolio to determine how we can best meet our community and customers’ needs and ensure partners are supported in crafting beverages in a warm and welcoming environment,” a Starbucks spokesperson told the news source. “We look forward to continuing to serve the community and visitors at our other nearby locations, including the original store at 1912 Pike Place and 1st and University.”

Adam Hasson, the building’s leasing agent, also confirmed to KOMO News that Starbucks has already signed an early termination agreement.

“We just saw the for sale signs that went up, and we were like, ‘Oh my gosh, it’s like, actually real,’” Deanna Cunningham, a nearby store manager, said. “The main focus is to have your customers feel comfortable, and if that isn’t happening, even if they are busy, it’s so many tourists that that’s their first interaction with Starbucks sometimes, and I understand that can deter people.”

The Seattle Times reported that the Starbucks location temporarily closed at the end of July 2024.

“[The company was evaluating] how best to offer a warm and welcoming environment for customers and partners [employees] at this store,” Starbucks spokesperson Sam Jefferies told the Times.

Starbucks also closed some of its stores in Seattle due to the high crime rates in 2022.

The coffee company became infamous over the years for its radical left-wing ideology by virtue signaling, firing its employees who dared to refuse to wear LGBT Pride shirts, supporting BLM, backing Joe Biden’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate and firing its white employees only because of the color of their skin.

Wikipedia Pushes Pro-Hamas Propaganda, Then Deletes to Avoid Backlash

(Dmytro “Henry” Aleksandrov, Headline USA) Wikipedia editors recently deleted an entry from one of its articles in which the website’s editors stated that Hamas has won nearly every battle against Israel since Oct. 7, 2023.

The Washington Free Beacon reported that Wikipedia editors declared in an article listing “military engagements during the Israel–Hamas war” that Hamas and its terror allies won almost every battle with Israel last year.

The news source discovered that after looking at multiple archived entry versions.

It was also reported that the page remained active until the end of 2024 despite no evidence behind the editors’ claims. The website removed the section and added a disclaimer stating, “This article has multiple issues,” only after the entry went viral on social media.

It wasn’t the only time when Wikipedia showed the world that its editors despised Israel. The website previously allowed the spread of the narrative about Jews being “colonizers” on one of Wikipedia’s September 2024 articles.

Joe Truzman, an expert on Palestinian militant groups with the Foundation for Defense of Democracies think tank, told the Beacon that the latest scandal indicated once again that people should not trust Wikipedia, especially when it comes to information regarding Israel and Hamas.

“Readers should not use Wikipedia as a primary source of information about the war in Gaza,” Truzman said. “The authors often blend factual information with inaccuracies, obscuring the conflict’s complexities for readers seeking a neutral understanding. Those who lack a deep background in the war or the historical context of the Gaza-Israel conflicts will struggle to distinguish between fact and fiction on the platform.”

In addition to the war in the Middle East, Wikipedia became infamous for promoting far-left beliefs in its articles on everything related to American politics. For example, Wikipedia previously tried to hide the fact that President Abraham Lincoln was a Republican, deleted an entry on Hunter Biden’s film, changed the definition of the word “recession,” and promoted leftist ideology in many other ways.

“If you look at the articles that Wikipedia has, you can just see how they are simply mouthing the view of the World Economic Council or World Economic Forum, and the World Health Organization, the CDC and various other establishment mouthpieces like Fauci,” Wikipedia Co-Founder Larry Sanger previously said.

Rep. Eric Swalwell’s Jab at GOP Senator Blows Up in His Face

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) Rep. Eric Swalwell, D-Calif., recently took aim at Sen. John Kennedy, R-La., mocking his witty personality and claiming he only “acts like a grown-up” when the cameras are off. However, Swalwell’s comment quickly backfired. 

Kennedy had come under leftist fire on Wednesday after joking about the position of an NBC reporter being placed to the “right” during a press conference addressing the ISIS-linked New Orleans massacre. 

On Thursday, Swalwell shared on X a news report criticizing Kennedy, accusing the Republican senator of acting childish for political attention.

Contrasting that with Kennedy’s behavior at the press conference, Swalwell claimed he had been on an FBI briefing call with Kennedy, where the senator “acted like a grown-up” and “asked real questions.” 

“When the cameras aren’t on, most of these MAGA pro wrestlers actually act normal. Which makes their acting that much more pathetic,” Swalwell added, garnering over 1.3 million views. 

Critics swiftly turned the tables on Swalwell, highlighting his controversial past, including alleged ties to Chinese spy Christine Fang and his role in promoting the discredited Russian collusion hoax. 

“How did you act with Fang Fang off camera…?” asked Gunther Eagleman, a political commentator known for his fiery takes.  

Marc A. Thiessen, former Bush speechwriter and Washington Post columnist, also took aim at Swalwell, pointing to his promotion of the discredited Russian collusion narrative.   

“I’ve met you off camera and you’re quite normal, even nice. But then you get on camera and suggest you’ve seen classified evidence Donald Trump was a Russian agent — only to have the Mueller probe find that was a conspiracy theory,” Thiessen wrote. 

Thiessen added: “You might want to remove the beam from your own eye before pointing out the splinter in your neighbor’s eye.”  

West Virginia politician Derrick Evans chimed in, asking, “Are you still sleeping with Chinese spies? How the hell are you sitting in on any sort of briefing?”  

RedState columnist Buzz Patterson joined the chorus of criticism: “Biggest TV whore on Capitol Hill says what?” 

Columbia Univ. Professor Claims Jews Are Not Descendants of Ancient Hebrews

(Dmytro “Henry” Aleksandrov, Headline USA) The Washington Free Beacon recently discovered that Columbia University professor Joseph Massad, who is supposed to teach a course on “Zionism,” accused Jews of engaging in a “Hitlerian project” for claiming they are the descendants of ancient Hebrews.

During one of the InFocus with Ejaz Haider episodes, titled “Busting Zionist Myths,” Massad stated that Jews being the descendants of the ancient Hebrews is a “bogus claim,” calling them a “strange European group.”

“The idea that European Jews are somehow direct descendants of the ancient Hebrews is, of course, a bogus claim. Even if Jews believed somehow [they had] some lineage, at least a religious or spiritual lineage [to ancient Hebrews], by the 17th and 18th centuries, this idea amongst European Christians would become important, especially to estrange European Jews from Europe, and they begin to cast them as ‘Asiatics’—people who have come from Asia originally,” he said.

“What is special here about Zionism is not only the invention of ancient Israel and the invention of Jews as descendants of the ancient Hebrews. It’s almost like a Hitlerian project to speak of Jews genetically in this fashion. And it only becomes fashionable, of course, in the 19th century, with the rise of racial science and the biological sciences,” he added.

According to the news source, Massad and the host, Ejaz Haider, a senior resident fellow at the University of Lahore’s Center for Security, Strategy and Policy Research, praised Hamas’s Oct. 7, 2023, terror attack.

Additionally, the Beacon stated that the podcast is hosted on a platform sponsored by the university, which endorsed “the Palestinians’ fight for freedom”  one month after the attack.

Some Jews on Twitter pointed out the logic in the anti-Semitic rhetoric of Massad.

“‘Jews aren’t Jews. Zionism is actually anti-Jewish.’ Does this ever work?”

The fact that Columbia officials allowed the anti-Semitic professor to teach the class at the university was not very surprising, considering that the university has now become synonymous with the hatred of Jews.

Columbia’s students previously blamed Israel for Hamas’s terrorist attack, protested to the point when commencement ceremony and in-person classes were canceled and published anti-Semitic newspapers.

DOJ Spent Over $100M on DEI, Restorative Justice

(Dmytro “Henry” Aleksandrov, Headline USA) Between 2021 and 2024, the Justice Department spent over $100 million promoting the DEI agenda in classrooms.

A new Parents Defending Education (PDE) report that the Daily Wire obtained revealed that the DOJ awarded over $100,113,942 through 102 grants. According to the report, the leftist propaganda affected 946 school districts and upwards of 3 million K-12 students in 36 states.

The Daily Wire reported that the funds were spent on proposals promoting “restorative justice practices, social and emotional learning practices, and [DEI] practices in the classroom over the past four years.”

DOJ’s STOP School Violence Program awarded the funds, providing grant money to school districts, nonprofits and city and state governments through projects that “increase school safety by implementing solutions that will improve school climate.”

“DOJ STOP grants were intended to be used to address and ameliorate school violence, which has been a major issue of concern to parents across the country over the past several years,” PDE president Nicki Neily said, adding that “it’s appalling,” but “not surprising that DOJ bureaucrats would prioritize DEI initiatives over student safety.”

According to the report, some of these projects proposed bringing in consultants from groups like “Courageous Conversations About Race” or “International Institute for Restorative Practices” who would push their anti-white ideology in schools.

As expected, many of the projects funded by the DOJ explicitly stated that they would discriminate against white and straight students based on their skin color and sexual orientation.

Conservatives on Twitter criticized the department and the Biden-Harris administration for wasting the taxpayers’ money by pushing divisive political ideas.

“The Department of Education has to be abolished,” @GuntherEagleman wrote. “Sickening! All taxpayer money.”

Others agreed that spending the taxpayers’ money to teach children that America is evil was a horrible idea.

Others also pointed out that the recent news explained why the DOJ doesn’t do anything about the “surging” crime rates, stating that the department spends all of the money on things like DEI initiatives instead of “[keeping] our streets safe.”

Intrigue Deepens in Vegas Carbomb Mystery as Viral Theory Suggests Possible Hoax

(Headline USA) A popular conservative podcaster suggested that suspected Las Vegas carbomber Matthew Livelsberger might still be alive—and may be a military whistleblower—as conflicting evidence dispelled the notions of a politically motivated attack.

Authorities claimed to have positively identified the charred corpse in a Tesla Cybertruck as Livelsberger after it exploded outside the Trump Tower Las Vegas hotel.

However, Livelsberger, an active-duty Green Beret at the time of his purported death, left a note saying it was stunt to serve as “wakeup call” for the country’s ills, investigators said Friday.

The 37-year-old from Colorado Springs, Colorado, also wrote in the note that he needed to “cleanse my mind” of the lives lost of people he knew and “the burden of the lives I took.”

According to the theory being advanced by podcaster Shawn Ryan, Livelsberger may have staged the attack by putting a corpse in it before directing it to autopilot to the Trump hotel.

An email posted by Ryan, which was not confirmed by Headline USA, suggested that Livelsberger may have had inside information about the spate of recent drone sightings in American airspace.

Livelsberger apparently harbored no ill will toward President-elect Donald Trump, Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department officials said.

“Although this incident is more public and more sensational than usual, it ultimately appears to be a tragic case of suicide involving a heavily decorated combat veteran who was struggling with PTSD and other issues,” FBI Special Agent In Charge Spencer Evans said at a news conference.

The explosion caused minor injuries to seven people but virtually no damage to the hotel. Authorities said Friday that Livelsberger acted alone.

“This was not a terrorist attack, it was a wakeup call. Americans only pay attention to spectacles and violence. What better way to get my point across than a stunt with fireworks and explosives,” Livelsberger wrote in a letter found by authorities who released only excerpts of it.

Investigators claimed to have identified the Tesla driver—who was burned beyond recognition—as Livelsberger by a tattoo and by comparing DNA from relatives.

The cause of death was a self-inflicted gunshot to the head, according to coroners officials.

Pentagon officials have declined to say whether Livelsberger may have been suffering from mental health issues but say they have turned over his medical records to police.

Authorities excerpted the messages from two letters Livelsberger wrote using a cellphone note application, Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department Assistant Sheriff Dori Koren said.

The letters covered a range of topics including political grievances, domestic issues and societal issues, Koren said.

Tesla engineers, meanwhile, helped extract data from the Cybertruck for investigators, including Livelsberger’s path between charging stations from Colorado through New Mexico and Arizona and on to Las Vegas, Koren said.

“We still have a large volume of data to go through,” Koren said. “There’s thousands if not millions of videos and photos and documents and web history and all of those things that need to be analyzed.”

The new details came as investigators sought to determine Livelsberger’s motive, including whether he sought to make a political point with the Tesla and the hotel bearing the president-elect’s name.

Tesla CEO Elon Musk has recently become a member of Trump’s inner circle. Neither Trump nor Musk was in Las Vegas early Wednesday, the day of the explosion. Both had attended Trump’s New Year’s Eve party at his South Florida estate.

Musk spent an estimated $250 million during the presidential campaign to support Trump, who has named Musk, the world’s richest man, to co-lead a new effort to find ways to cut the government’s size and spending.

Investigators suspect Livelsberger may have been planning a more damaging attack but the steel-sided vehicle absorbed much of the force from the crudely built explosive.

Investigators said previously that Livelsberger shot himself inside the Tesla Cybertruck packed with fireworks just before it exploded outside Trump International Hotel in Las Vegas on New Year’s Day.

“It’s not lost on us that it’s in front of the Trump building, that it’s a Tesla vehicle, but we don’t have information at this point that definitively tells us or suggests it was because of this particular ideology,” Spencer Evans, the Las Vegas FBI’s special agent in charge, said Thursday.

Asked Friday about whether Livelsberger had been struggling with any mental health issues that may have prompted his suicide, Pentagon spokeswoman Sabrina Singh told reporters that “the department has turned over all medical records to local law enforcement.”

A law enforcement official said investigators learned through interviews that he may have gotten into a fight with his wife about relationship issues shortly before he rented the Tesla in Colorado on Saturday and bought the guns. The official spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the ongoing investigation.

Among the charred items found inside the truck were a handgun at Livelsberger’s feet, another firearm, fireworks, a passport, a military ID, credit cards, an iPhone and a smartwatch, Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Sheriff Kevin McMahill said. Authorities said both guns were purchased legally.

Livelsberger served in the Green Berets, highly trained special forces who work to counter terrorism abroad and train partners. He had served in the Army since 2006, rising through the ranks with a long career of overseas assignments, deploying twice to Afghanistan and serving in Ukraine, Tajikistan, Georgia and Congo, the Army said. He had recently returned from an overseas assignment in Germany and was on approved leave when he died, according to a U.S. official.

He was awarded a total of five Bronze Stars, including one with a valor device for courage under fire, a combat infantry badge and an Army Commendation Medal with valor.

Authorities searched a townhouse in Livelsberger’s hometown of Colorado Springs Thursday as part of the investigation. Neighbors said the man who lived there had a wife and a baby.

Cindy Helwig, who lives diagonally across a narrow street separating the homes, said she last saw the man she knew as Matthew about two weeks ago when he asked her if he could borrow a tool he needed to fix an SUV he was working on.

“He was a normal guy,” said Helwig, who said she last saw the wife and baby earlier this week.

The explosion of the truck, packed with firework mortars and camp fuel canisters, came hours after 42-year-old Shamsud-Din Bahar Jabbar rammed a truck into a crowd in New Orleans’ famed French Quarter early on New Year’s Day, killing at least 14 people before being shot to death by police. The FBI says they believe Jabbar acted alone and that it is being investigated as a terrorist attack.

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

FBI Attempts Cleanup w/ Pipe-Bomb Evidence Dump after Damning Loudermilk Report

(Headline USA) As the tenure of FBI Director Christopher Wray winds down and the politicized agency prepares for a house-cleaning under presumptive Trump appointee Kash Patel, feds appeared to be attempting to get in front of one of the biggest suspected cover-up operations connected with the Jan. 6, 2021 uprising at the U.S. Capitol.

The FBI released more information about its pipe bomb investigation, including an estimate that the unidentified suspect is about 5 feet 7 inches tall. The bureau also was also posting previously unreleased video of the suspect placing one of the bombs.

Images show the suspect was wearing a gray hooded sweatshirt, a face mask, black gloves and a black and grey pair of Nike Air Max Speed Turf shoes with a yellow logo. The person also wore or carried a backpack containing the bombs.

Surveillance video captured the suspect placing the pipe bombs near the Republican and Democratic national committees’ offices between 7:30 p.m. and 8:30 p.m. on Jan. 5, 2021. Nobody was hurt before the bombs were rendered safe, but the FBI says both devices could have been lethal.

Yet, a host of basic questions remains unanswered four years later. For starters, investigators claim not to know if the suspect is a man or a woman.

Furthermore, they have not established a clear link between the pipe bombs, which were placed on Jan. 5, and the breaching of the Capitol itself by a group comprising Trump supporters, left-wing activists and more than two dozen FBI informants.

The lack of answers have driven many to suspect that it may have been a false-flag attempt overseen by the feds themselves to force the evacuation of the Capitol as Republican lawmakers attempted to challenge the highly dubious outcome of the 2020 election.

Some noted that then-Vice President-elect Kamala Harris was within mere yards of one of the bombs during an early-morning visit to the DNC headquarters. However, she has offered little in the way of public acknowledgement about the imminent danger she faced, falsely claiming, to the contrary, that she was in the Capitol at the time.

Other theories included indication that the FBI might be fully aware of the pipe-bomb suspect’s identity. After counterterrorism whistleblower Jade Parker released a Google Drive document and social-media posts claiming to know the identity, Parker mysteriously vanished.

The FBI long denied having any operatives in the crowd that breached the Capitol until the release of a damning inspector general’s report last month, one day after Wray announced his resignation.

It continued to deny any additional knowledge or direct involvement with respect to the planting of the bombs.

The FBI “can’t work on assumptions,” said David Sundberg, assistant director in charge of the bureau’s Washington field office.

“Without being able to confirm the suspect’s identity, it is very hard to definitively establish motive,” Sundberg told the Associated Press. “Therefore, it would be difficult for us to state that there is a link, although we can’t state there is not one.”

House Republicans also have criticized security lapses, questioning how law enforcement failed to detect the bombs for 17 hours.

The FBI release comes on the heels of a bombshell report from Rep. Barry Loudermilk, R-Ga., and the House Administration Committee suggesting an FBI coverup.

“After more than 1,400 days since two pipe bombs were placed on Capitol Hill, the FBI has made no arrest and has charged no individuals with planting the explosive devices,” the reoirt noted. “Since its initial progress in the early weeks and months of the investigation, there has been little meaningful progress toward the apprehension of the suspect.”

Sundberg insisted that the agency’s good faith efforts had simply run up against the constraints of its limited resources.

“We remain focused on conducting an investigation using all of the tools we have at our disposal,” he claimed. “But it is incumbent upon us to follow facts and evidence.”

The FBI insists it has assessed over 600 tips, reviewed about 39,000 video files and conducted more than 1,000 interviews over the past four years.

Harris was inside the DNC offices when the pipe bomb was found outside the building about 1:05 p.m. on Jan. 6. Before the bomb was deactivated, then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s motorcade passed by the DNC building as she was evacuated from the Capitol, according to House Republicans.

This week, the FBI was releasing a minute-long video that showed the suspect sitting on a park bench outside the DNC before placing the first bomb there at about 7:54 p.m. The suspect placed the second bomb about 8:16 p.m., in an alley behind the RNC, the FBI claimed.

The FBI also was releasing closeup images of the type of Nike sneakers worn by the suspect. Fewer than 25,000 pairs of the same shoe were sold between August 2018 and January 2021, according to the FBI.

“Based on attire, those are probably the most remarkable or distinctive feature when it comes to clothing the suspect wore,” Sundberg said. “We’re hoping that somebody might recognize that.”

The FBI used surveillance footage to track the suspect’s movements through Capitol Hill on the night of Jan. 5. The suspect initially is captured on video at about 7:34 p.m. at the intersection of First Street and North Carolina Avenue. The suspect is last seen on camera around 8:18 p.m. heading east on Rumsey Court.

“The suspect in this case did a very good job covering themselves up at a time that this would not be abnormal, so it didn’t raise any attention,” Sundberg said, referring to face masking during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Video of the suspect was sporadically available and often of poor quality, according to Sundberg. The 17-hour gap between the planting and discovery of the pipe bombs made it more difficult to identify potential witnesses, he claimed.

Investigative journalist Julie Kelly pointed to other evidence, however, showing that higher-speed videos existed and had previously been released. She said the new evidence dump appeared to be staged as part of the agency’s cover-up operations.

Authorities previously offered a reward of up to $500,000 for information leading to the suspect’s arrest and conviction.

The Babylon Bee, a conservative satire site, said the new release may be part of a crafty effort to collect its own reward money.

President-elect Trump, who returns to the White House on Jan. 20, repeatedly has vowed to pardon some or many of the political dissidents who entered the Capitol. More than 1,500 people have been charged by the Biden Justice Department with Jan. 6-related crimes. About 1,100 have been convicted and sentenced. Over 700 defendants got terms of imprisonment ranging from a few days to 22 years.

Sundberg said he doesn’t expect the change in administration to alter the course of the FBI’s pipe bomb investigation.

“We don’t know who the suspect is,” he added. “And I expect that we will continue to work this case until its logical conclusion and we identify a suspect.”

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

Biden Rejects Nippon Steel’s Proposed Deal to Acquire US Steel

(Headline USA) President Joe Biden has rejected the nearly $15 billion proposed deal for Nippon Steel of Japan to purchase Pittsburgh-based U.S. Steel—affirming his earlier vow to block the acquisition of Steeltown USA’s most storied steel company.

“We need major U.S. companies representing the major share of US steelmaking capacity to keep leading the fight on behalf of America’s national interests,” Biden said in a Friday morning statement.

His decision comes after the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, known as CFIUS, failed to reach consensus on the possible national security risks of the deal last month, and sent a long-awaited report on the merger to Biden. He had 15 days to reach a final decision.

The committee, chaired by Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen and made up of other Cabinet members, can recommend that the president block a transaction, and federal law gives the president that power.

A U.S. official familiar with the matter, who spoke on condition of anonymity, told The Associated Press last month that some federal agencies represented on the panel were skeptical that allowing a Japanese company to buy an American-owned steelmaker would create national security risks.

The decision comes just weeks before the Democratic president is set to leave office and could damage relations between the U.S. and Japan, which is America’s biggest ally in Asia. Japan is also the largest foreign holder of U.S. debt.

Biden previously came out against the deal last March — and was backed by the United Steelworkers, concerned over whether the company would honor existing labor agreements or slash jobs, as well as over the firm’s financial transparency.

“It is important that we maintain strong American steel companies powered by American steel workers,” Biden said in a March statement, while he was still seeking reelection to the presidency before dropping out of the race. “U.S. Steel has been an iconic American steel company for more than a century, and it is vital for it to remain an American steel company that is domestically owned and operated.”

President-elect Donald Trump has also opposed the acquisition and vowed in December on his Truth Social platform to block the deal and to use tax incentives and tariffs to grow the company.

On Friday, Steelworkers President David McCall said the union is grateful for Biden’s move to block the sale and called it the “right move for our members and our national security.”

McCall had long questioned Nippon Steel’s status as an honest broker for U.S. national trade interests and reiterated that Friday, saying in a statement that “Nippon has proven itself to be a serial trade cheater.”

“Allowing it to purchase U.S. Steel would have offered it the opportunity to further destabilize our trade system from within and in the process, compromise our ability to meet our own national security and critical infrastructure needs,” McCall said.

McCall insisted that U.S. Steel has the financial wherewithal to make the company strong and resilient.

For its part, Nippon Steel had said it is best positioned to help American steel compete in an industry dominated by the Chinese and to invest billions in United Steelworkers-represented facilities, including the company’s aging blast furnaces.

It pledged to protect U.S. Steel in trade matters, and promised not to import steel slabs that would compete with the blast furnaces.

Nippon Steel announced in December 2023 that it planned to buy the steel producer for $14.9 billion in cash and debt, and committed to keep the U.S. Steel name and Pittsburgh headquarters.

Despite that, its proposal raised concerns about what the transaction could mean for unionized workers, supply chains and U.S. national security.

The announcement came during a tide of renewed political support for rebuilding America’s manufacturing sector and followed a long stretch of protectionist U.S. tariffs that analysts say have helped reinvigorate domestic steel.

Nippon Steel waged a public relations campaign to win over supporters, even offering $5,000 in closing bonuses to U.S. Steel employees, a nearly $100 million expense.

A growing number of conservatives and business groups like the U.S. Chamber had publicly backed the deal, as Nippon Steel began to win over some Steelworkers union members and mayors in areas near its blast furnaces in Pennsylvania and Indiana.

Mike Pompeo, who served as Trump’s first secretary of state, called a potential rejection of the deal “shortsighted” in the Wall Street Journal last month.

“The deal would strengthen U.S. Steel’s current operations and production capacity, benefit its workers and their communities, and enhance the competitiveness of the American steel industry,” he wrote.

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

Courts Reject Activist Attempt to Press Criminal Charges against Clarence Thomas

(Headline USA) The federal courts on Thursday rejected Democrat-led efforts to refer allegations of ethics crimes against Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas to the Justice Department.

Thomas, along with his eight colleagues on the court, has agreed to follow updated requirements on reporting trips and gifts, including clearer guidelines on hospitality from friends, the U.S. Judicial Conference wrote in a letter to Democratic senators who had targeted Thomas over the luxury trips.

Thomas has previously said he wasn’t required to disclose the many trips he and his wife took that were paid for by wealthy GOP donor Harlan Crow and other benefactors because they are close personal friends. The court didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment Thursday.

Thomas was not alone in facing criticism for unreported perks that blurred the line on potential conflicts of interest. Liberal justices including the late Ruth Bader Ginsberg, Obama appointee Sonia Sotomayor and Biden appointee Ketanji Brown Jackson have been accused of failing to report outside influences including lucrative awards and book deals.

It’s unclear whether the law allows the U.S. Judicial Conference to make a criminal referral regarding a Supreme Court justice, U.S. District Judge Robert Conrad wrote.

He serves as secretary for the conference, which sets policy for the federal court system and is led by Chief Justice John Roberts.

A referral in Thomas’s case isn’t necessary, Conrad said, because the two Democrat senators called on Attorney General Merrick Garland to appoint a special counsel over the summer. No such appointment has been publicly made.

Conrad sent a similar response to a separate complaint from a conservative legal group, the Center for Renewing America, in regard to Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson’s reports on the source of her husband’s consulting income.

Jackson has since amended her disclosures and also agreed to updated reporting requirements, Conrad wrote.

Focus on Thomas and fellow conservative Samuel Alito began after a leftist billionaire-funded foundation targeted them as part of a selective outrage campaign, deploying the activist ProPublica outlet to wage its smear campaign.

The activist attack led partisan Democrat Sens. Sheldon Whitehouse of Rhode Island and Dick Durbin of Illinois to use the issue in order to score cheap talking points on the Senate Judiciary Committee.

It was part of a broader reffort to delegitimize the conservative-majority court, with President Joe Biden having gone so far as forming a blue-ribbon committee to study issues including of court-packing and term limits—in possible violation of the U.S. Constitution.

The leftist groups also may have hoped to pressure Thomas and Alito to resign—or else be impeached—during Biden’s presidency, giving him the opportunity to flip a conservative seat.

The Supreme Court adopted its first code of ethics in 2023 in the face of sustained criticism, though the new code still lacks a means of enforcement.

The activist group Fix the Court said the financial disclosure law was clear and should apply to justices.

“The Conference’s letters further underscore the need for Congress to create a new and transparent mechanism to investigate the justices for ethics violations since the Conference is unwilling to act upon the one method we had presumed existed to do that,” said a statement from Executive Director Gabe Roth, whose salary absorbs 96% of the organization’s revenue.

Congressional oversight and regulation of the court could potentially do more to politicize the judicial branch, which was designed to be free of political influence under the Constitution.

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

Menendez Seeks Lenient Sentence, Claiming Conviction Made Him a ‘National Punchline’

(Headline USA) Lawyers for disgraced ex-Sen. Bob Menendez, D-N.J. are urging a judge to be lenient at his sentencing later this month for his conviction on bribery charges, saying the ordeal has made him a “national punchline.”

Late Thursday, the lawyers wrote to the judge who will sentence him to say that the Democrat’s positive actions through an unusual life spent overcoming hardships should weigh in his favor. Sentencing is scheduled for July 29.

The 71-year-old Menendez was convicted in July of 16 corruption charges brought by prosecutors who asserted that he used his power in the Senate to do favors that benefited three New Jersey businessmen.

Two of the businessmen were convicted along with him while a third pleaded guilty to charges and testified at the trial.

The lawyers told Judge Sidney H. Stein that Menendez had fallen on hard times since he was charged in the case in 2023, losing the Senate seat he held for 18 years, along with most of his “once broad circle of friends and political allies.”

His wife faces trial next month on many of the same charges after her case was delayed so she could be treated for breast cancer.

“Unsurprisingly, Senator Menendez’s conviction has rendered him a national punchline and stripped him of every conceivable personal, professional, and financial benefit,” they wrote. “Bob is now 71, with his long-built reputation in tatters.

“He has suffered financial and professional ruin. And he now is helping his wife battle a life-threatening cancer diagnosis in the midst of her upcoming trial in this case. We respectfully submit that, notwithstanding his conviction, Bob is deserving of mercy because of the penalties already imposed, his age, and the lack of a compelling need to impose a custodial sentence,” the lawyers added.

They noted that the Probation Department calculated federal sentencing guidelines as calling for a sentence as high as 24 years to 30 years behind bars, although Probation recommended a dozen years in prison, which the Menendez lawyers characterized as “draconian.”

They said properly calculated federal guidelines would actually call for a roughly two-year prison term and even that would be too much punishment.

Federal prosecutors were scheduled to submit their own sentencing recommendations later this month.

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press