Chris Cuomo Accused of Calling Former CNN Colleague ‘Tinsel Crotch’

(Ken Silva, Headline USA) Former CNN commentator Angela Rye recently accused her then-colleague Chris Cuomo of calling her “tinsel crotch” in a text message while they worked together, reportedly saying that the incident led to her ouster at the news network.

Rye reportedly made the accusation on the first episode of her new podcast, “Native Land Pod.”

Rye reportedly said that CNN decided not to renew her contract in January 2021, ostensibly because the network was shifting its focus from politics to COVID. But reportedly called that excuse a “lie” since “two Black women were hired for half my current contributor rate right after,” according to Fox News’s report on her podcast.

“It all began on New Year’s Day when I posted a picture of myself looking forward to the new year in a gold-sequined bikini on Instagram. Cuomo screenshot the image and said, ‘Happy New Year, tinsel crotch,’” Rye reportedly said.

“Stunned, I read and reread the message a dozen times, trying to understand. If I somehow brought this on myself since whatever you post on social is fair game, right? I teared up… I felt like the safest place I had on a show on CNN had been compromised.”

Cuomo allegedly texted Rye a few hours later the next day to “discuss work,” but she delayed responding to him, she said. When she did, she reportedly asked if he “still wanted to discuss his work idea despite him mentioning tinsel bikini and tinsel bottom along the way.”

Rye then blamed the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol Hill protest for not speaking up about the text sooner, according to Fox News.

“As I think about this, it feels so f—ing small compared to what other women in the workplace experience, but I was afraid to speak up,” she reportedly said

“Between New Year’s and my follow-up, an insurrection happened on Capitol Hill where I feared I would lose loved ones. I felt like if I called him out, I was risking everything I was finally starting to build with the network and, as someone who is known for being courageous, I cannot begin to tell you how much I felt like… a coward. In 10 short days, I felt like what was the clear ride to the Promised Land turned into quicksand.”

Dye reportedly apologized for not speaking out sooner, and promised to never go on Cuomo’s show. Cuomo is now working for News Nation.

CNN reportedly declined to comment, while Cuomo has yet to publicly address the situation.

Ken Silva is a staff writer at Headline USA. Follow him at twitter.com/jd_cashless.

SELLERS: Woke America’s Next ‘New Normal’ Is 3-Hour Restaurant Waits

(Ben Sellers, Headline USA) Although it may have come at a considerable cost, I have fairly well insulated myself since the pandemic from the toxicity that is the woke world. 

It became clear during COVID that there were two parallel Americas that co-existed, and I was neither willing nor welcome to participate in the one that prescribed certain authoritarian mandates while eroding the usual customs and expectations in other areas that had long helped America to thrive.

One of those bygone tenets of the old capitalist system, which is certainly up for debate but perhaps best seen as a guiding principle more than anything: “The customer is always right.”

You can argue that there are individual cases when the customer is wrong, but when your entire mindset is that your customers are privileged and beholden to you as an establishment—or that, as an employee, you are entitled to compensation above and beyond your contracted wages—then a brutal awakening is sure to follow.

Such appears to be the case at ‘Cille and ‘Scoe, a restaurant in Greensboro, N.C., that I had the misfortune of visiting for Sunday brunch over the weekend.

Normally, the red flags—telegraphing their values (and work ethic) through subtle and not-so-subtle cues, such as a drag queen brunch and gender-neutral multi-person restrooms— would have kept me clear away from such a place.

The negative reviews warning of slow service and rude staff, of course, should have been another dead giveaway.

But those tend to get buried by the algorithms under generic posts offering warm platitudes and glowing praise for the restaurant, which touts itself proudly as a “black-owned business” (note: see epilogue for more on this).

It’s worth mentioning that the manager we ultimately dealt with was a young white woman with excessive facial piercings, who seemed severely out of depth in terms of her professional skills.

Credit goes to the restaurant’s marketing department, because its website and social- media presence do paint a much more appealing picture of its fare and overall ambiance than that which we encountered.

The restaurant, which opened in 2022, got early buzz when its chef made an appearance on the Food Network’s Chopped after its Instagram account caught the network’s eye.

As it happened, a close family member of mine with stage-four cancer was visiting Greensboro for the weekend—a last hurrah before undergoing an intensive chemotherapy treatment—and the restaurant had caught his eye as well.

Also in our party of six was his 7-year-old niece, who had compiled a long list of special things to do with him on that Sunday afternoon before he left early the next morning.

However, the wait staff, kitchen staff and management at ‘Cille and ‘Scoe had other plans in mind for how we were to spend the large part of our Sunday: sitting at a cramped table on metal, backless stools for nearly three hours as we awaited what should have been a relatively simple food order.

In fairness to the restaurant, they had posted on their door that they were short-staffed and asked patrons to be patient, and when we came in for our 1:30 p.m. reservation, they were indeed busy.

It’s hard to say, though, whether the bustle was due to the restaurant’s popularity or its lack of efficiency. Having had ample opportunity to observe, I saw few (if any) new customers enter the restaurant after we were seated.

Our waitress, a pleasant enough young woman who shared a name with a 1990s rapper, quickly seated us and took drink and appetizer orders, and all was well, leaving us to suspect little of what was in store.

Thereafter, she proceeded to disappear and remained largely inattentive except to make periodic excuses for the delays. It was another 10-15 minutes before she returned with some coffees and, with some prompting, took our food orders so that the kitchen could get started while we noshed on our appetizer and enjoyed mimosa flights—or so we thought.

Some time later, she returned again, explaining that they were out of the wine normally used for mimosas and that we would have to buy the entire bottle if we wanted the two mimosa flights. The upcharge was only slightly more, and it meant more champagne, so we weren’t terribly distraught, but already we’d been waiting nearly 45 minutes and had yet even to see our cocktails.

We enjoyed our cocktails, eager finally to have begun the culinary process, but it would be another half hour before the appetizer came—a $26 “biscuit board” for the entire table that consisted of a single cut-up biscuit with several different jams, gravies and a smattering of protein. It was not what we had expected from the description, and hardly worth the wait.

The waitress had explained to us that the reason for the delay was that the kitchen had run out of biscuits and needed to make a fresh batch. Where the rest of them went, who knows?

Still, it would be at least another half hour before our food arrived. As we waited into our second hour at the cramped table, playing Wordle to pass the time, our waitress finally confessed that there had been a large party in the back room that had come in right before us, and so this was not simply the normal short-staffing delay.

Sensing our growing irritation, the aforementioned manager also came over and repeated the same thing, but offered no sort of make-good as one might expect, nor any particular apology. She more appeared to be complaining to us about the situation, blaming us for the fact that she was having to do her job.

At this point, the restaurant was largely deserted and past its posted closing time.

Once the food arrived, the waitress was remarkably quick to bring the check, which suited us just fine, but there was one more nasty surprise in store: an automatic 20% gratuity added in, with no attention called to it anywhere.

When I confronted the waitress and the manager about it, they explained that if we were to cut back on the tip it would be punishing the waitress, and not the kitchen staff who were responsible for the delays. I indicated that we were dissatisfied with both.

The manager claimed that it was posted on their menu that they added in an automatic gratuity for parties of 6 or more, although we did not see it anywhere on there.

At any rate, that particular battle wasn’t worth fighting over.

Nonetheless, in the Marxist cultural rot that is the “woke mind virus,” there comes a time when we must somehow stand our ground, or else learn to accept three-hour restaurant waits as the new normal.

At no point did anyone—the waitress, the manager or, later, the owners—seem to acknowledge that such a wait was simply unacceptable under any circumstances, and entirely avoidable if their kitchen were better managed.

At the very least, a three-hour wait could have been an enjoyable experience in a more comfortable setting, if properly attended to and duly compensated for the time stolen from us—rather than expected to pay the waitress extra for it.

Instead, we, as a society, will continue to labor under the delusion that ‘Cille and ‘Scoe—and many others like them—are thriving and successful enterprises. Every so often, a complaint will break through their constructed facade, and eventually their own poor business practices will run them aground.

Then, they will declare themselves to have been the victims of systemic racism and institutional oppression all along. But the fact is that ‘Cille and ‘Scoe, by fostering an all-too-familiar sense of self-entitlement and hubris, is laying the foundation of its own failure, as is woke America at large.

Victory is inevitable, but at what cost to our precious time?

Epilogue: There are those on both the Right and Left who would love nothing more than to inject the canard of race into this discussion and make it about that, so as to overlook the real issue that underpins it.

It’s true that ‘Cille and ‘Scoe brought race into the narrative by incorporating it into their marketing. Does being a “black-owned business” apply only if the restaurant is well managed and serves its customers in a prompt and respectful fashion? Or does the experience I recounted impartially above also come with that package?

Either way, it is not my intention to impugn the black community at large. Had this been a black-owned restaurant telegraphing its values with a Trump flag outside, I absolutely would have gone in knowing to expect some of the best service, hospitality and Southern cooking imaginable.

The issues of poor work ethic and poor management have nothing to do with melanin levels, and everything to do with the cultivated sense of entitlement and lack of accountability that transcend racial barriers. Let’s not give these professional-grade victims any more ammo for their perpetual pity party.

I published this review on Martin Luther King Jr. Day, about a restaurant just blocks from the famed Woolworth’s lunch counter where people like Clarence Henderson (who spoke at the 2020 RNC convention) fought to advance black civil rights by insisting they be served during segregation.

Although the seating in ‘Cille and ‘Scoe was probably less comfortable than the lunch counter, this is not about race. It’s about a toxic mindset that has infected every walk of life in this country, and ESPECIALLY the ‘elite’ ruling class.

Ben Sellers is the editor of Headline USA. Follow him at twitter.com/realbensellers.

Bombshell NBC Article Reveals ‘Loose-Knit Network’ Conspiring to Stop Trump at All Cost

(Ken Silva, Headline USA) NBC News has published a report revealing that a “loose-knit network” of deep state actors and liberal activists are conspiring to undermine a Donald Trump presidency if he retakes office—igniting outrage among Trump supporters, who deem the plot as treasonous.

NBC reported Sunday that liberals are worried that Trump will attempt to become a “dictator” in his second term, and are using that fear to justify their plot against the President.

“Donald Trump is sparking fears among those who understand the inner workings of the Pentagon that he would convert the nonpartisan U.S. military into the muscular arm of his political agenda as he makes comments about dictatorship,” NBC reported.

“Now, bracing for Trump’s potential return, a loose-knit network of public interest groups and lawmakers is quietly devising plans to try to foil any efforts to expand presidential power, which could include pressuring the military to cater to his political needs.”

According to the article, the anti-Trump network is preparing to take legal action and send letters to his appointees spelling out consequences they’d face if they undermine constitutional norms, among other measures.

One of the key players of the anti-Trump network is reportedly Mary McCord, a former top Justice Department official involved in the illegal spying of Trump’s 2016 campaign. McCord approved the error-ridden FISA application to spy on campaign member Carter Page.

Other participants include Democracy Forward, an organization that took the Trump administration to court more than 100 times during his administration, and the similarly named group Protect Democracy.

Sunday’s article was reminiscent of another report written in the wake of the 2020 election, when Time Magazine reported on how a network of deep state actors prevented Trump from winning that race.

“[T]he participants want the secret history of the 2020 election told even though it sounds like a paranoid fever dream—a well-funded cabal of powerful people, ranging across industries and ideologies, working together behind the scenes to influence perceptions, change rules and laws, steer media coverage and control the flow of information,” the magazine wrote in February 2021, in an article titled The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign That Saved the 2020 Election.

“They were not rigging the election; they were fortifying it,” TIME continued. “And they believe the public needs to understand the system’s fragility in order to ensure that democracy in America endures.”

Ken Silva is a staff writer at Headline USA. Follow him at twitter.com/jd_cashless.

Bitcoin Is No Substitute for Gold

(Clint Siegner, Money Metals Exchange) With Bitcoin making the news last week when the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) finally approved exchange traded funds, it’s a good time to review the topic again.

Bitcoin still offers the potential to serve as a form of honest money and to end-run the central bankers and politicians who have abused the fiat system so badly.

Yet some proponents still market the crypto asset as “digital gold.”

That combined with the dramatic rally in bitcoin prices over the past year means there are plenty of interested investors.

There are good reasons to own bitcoin, but they are not the same reasons to own physical gold.

The notion of bitcoin as “digital gold” is dangerous and misleading.

Bitcoin vs Gold. Bitcoin Versus Gold.
Bitcoin vs Gold

First, the comparison with gold is nonsense. Bitcoin is not a reliable store of value nor is it a solid safe-haven asset.

Bitcoin is not proven or permanent. It is better to think of bitcoin as a promising technology.

If it succeeds in gaining widespread adoption and use, it will help solve some massive problems with world monetary systems. That hasn’t happened yet and there is no certainty it will.

Additionally, bitcoin will flourish just so long as it remains the most popular, useful, and secure cryptocurrency. Bitcoin is certainly the frontrunner. It has a bigger network effect and an advantage in terms of “brand” awareness versus other tokens, many of which have failed or been exposed as outright frauds.

Ask anyone who can remember the social media pioneer MySpace whether those advantages meant the technology company would remain permanently on top.

Bitcoin’s fortunes are tied to a community of volunteer developers working to improve and update the protocol. Humans are making judgments about the direction development should take, and it is therefore possible they will get it wrong.

Take, for example, the controversial decision to implement the Lightning Network.

Several years ago, there was a split in the community over the question of how best to scale up the ability for bitcoin to process more transactions per second, when severe speed limitations and costs became apparent during periods of high volume.

A majority decided to abandon trying to scale on the bitcoin blockchain itself and instead pursue a technology called Lighting Network.

While progress has been made in developing this second layer solution, there are plenty of problems remaining. Among them is the fact that Lightning is nowhere near as decentralized or secure as the bitcoin network itself.

Bitcoin is an innovative technology with both the potential to change the world AND the potential to fail and become worthless. Investors should buy it because they understand the project and believe it will succeed, not because it is “digital gold.”

Gold is a completely different animal. It is not a technology, and its value isn’t dependent on innovation, electricity, and an internet connection. There are no developers behind it.

Physical gold is scarce, durable, and beautiful and therefore valuable. These properties have made it useful as a safe haven and as a store of value for thousands of years. There is no substitute.

Jim Grant: It’s Too Early for the Fed to Declare ‘Mission Accomplished’

(Mike Maharrey, Money Metals Exchange) At its December meeting, the Federal Reserve effectively declared victory over inflation. They didn’t didn’t use those words, but that was the signal given by the policy trajectory laid out by the FOMC.

Is this victory dance premature?

Financial analyst Jim Grant thinks so.

In an interview on Bloomberg Markets: The Close with Romaine Bostick, Grant said it’s way too early for the Fed to say “mission accomplished.”

According to the Fed’s “dot plot” showing the expected trajectory of interest rates. The central bank has penciled in three rate cuts for 2024 with another four cuts in 2025. That would lower rates to between 2 and 2.5 percent.

Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell tried to temper this projection, emphasizing that inflation remains too high.

Inflation has eased from its highs, and this has come without a significant increase in unemployment. That’s very good news. But inflation is still too high. Ongoing progress in bringing it down is not assured and the path forward is uncertain.

Powell was talking, but the markets weren’t listening. As Bostick put it, they were all in on “mission accomplished.”

Grant disagreed with the notion that inflation is beat saying it is “endemic.” In other words, regularly occurring.

It recedes. It reappears. It never disappears.

Grant pointed out that the federal government is running massive budget deficits even with unemployment at 3.7 percent.

The Fed is all too eager, I think, to imply, if not declare, ‘mission accomplished. 

Bostick asked Grant why he thinks the Fed even felt the need to communicate rate cuts at this stage in the inflation fight. Grant said that if he could “read the mind of the composite Federal Reserve,” he thinks he would “impute this great insight.”

I think that they would say to themselves, ‘The cost, the unseen but still considerable cost of a decade’s worth of zero percent interest rates is a great malinvestment, as they say in the economic quarterlies.’ You know, the white elephants that spring up when money is free.

Artificially low interest rates incentivize borrowing and debt. This blows up economic bubbles. When the central bank tries to normalize rates, these bubbles inevitably pop. This cycle is no exception. We’re already seeing signs of distress in the economy with more corporate bankruptcies in 2023 than the pandemic year.

Grant said officials at the Fed are likely cognizant of this fact even if they would never say it out loud.

Misallocation of capital, let us call them misguided because of the false interest rates on offer, introduced an element of frailty in the structure of things. And what the Fed might be thinking is that notwithstanding a 3.7 percent unemployment, notwithstanding great looks you get from the Atlanta GDP Now data, notwithstanding all that, we don’t want to overdo it because of this underlying frailty induced by this decade-long experiment with zero percent borrowing cost.

Grant called inflation an “arbitrarily imposed tax,” and he said the new stance taken by the Fed, whether explicit or implicit, is basically “imposing a tax on the possibility of a sustained policy of much higher inflation than they had promised us.”

Grant went on to call the Fed’s 2 percent target a “dubious proposition.”

Money is what you get for work, which means money is heartbeats. … They’re not infinite, these heartbeats. And if you tax them through the depreciation of the currency – through a contemplated and intended depreciation of the currency – you are legislating, without a vote, a tax on the working lives of Americans. So, I think as a moral proposition, it’s dubious.

Milton Friedman said inflation is always and everywhere a monetary phenomenon. Grant said he would call it “always and everywhere a moral phenomenon.”

When you boil it all down, the Federal Reserve is stuck between a rock and a hard place. The question becomes what is the bigger burden – higher borrowing costs or higher price inflation?

Grant said he thinks Jerome Powell and other members of the Federal Reserve look in the mirror and see themselves as Captain Chesley Burnett “Sully” Sullenberger who landed a crippled U.S. Airways jet on the Hudson River. 

The Fed has arrogated to itself the role of central planning agency. … It’s going to try to balance economic growth with the stability and integrity of the currency. How do they do that? I don’t think it’s given to mortal man and woman to do these things.

Grant said he has proved to the readers of Grant’s Interest Rate Observer he can’t successfully predict the future no matter how hard he tries.

But the Fed has unintentionally done the same without acknowledging the same. However, it is proceeding as if it did have tomorrow’s newspaper in its hands, which it doesn’t.

Rubio Makes Major Endorsement Ahead of Iowa Caucuses

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., a failed 2016 Republican presidential candidate, has made a significant endorsement a day before the GOP Iowa 2024 caucuses. 

The Florida senator formally endorsed his former 2016 opponent, Donald Trump, pointing to some of Trump’s major accomplishments during his presidency.

“I support Trump because that kind of leadership is the ONLY way we will get the extraordinary actions needed to fix the disaster Biden has created,” Rubio stated in a Sunday Twitter announcement.

He added, “It’s time to get on with the work of beating Biden & saving America!” 

Earlier in his post, Rubio highlighted the expansion of the Child Tax Credit and sanctions on the Marxist regimes of Cuba and Venezuela as achievements during the Trump administration. Rubio emphasized that Trump “didn’t cave to special interests or let bureaucrats block us.” 

Rubio’s endorsement of Trump delivered a blow to Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, whom Rubio campaigned for in the 2022 midterm elections. Notably, Sen. Rick Scott, R-Fla., had already endorsed Trump in November 2023.

Iowa is set to hold its caucuses on Jan. 15.

North Dakota Gov. Doug Burgum, an unsuccessful 2024 Republican presidential candidate, also endorsed Trump in a speech in Iowa. 

“Under President Trump, America was safe and prosperous and tomorrow when you caucus, you have an opportunity to send a message to the nation and send a message to the work, that Donald Trump will make America great again,” Burgum said.

A final NBC News/Des Moines Register/Mediacom Iowa poll showed Trump leading with nearly a 30-point advantage over other candidates. The poll, published on Sunday, indicated Trump with 48% support, former U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley with 20% and DeSantis with 16%.

Tech mogul Vivek Ramaswamy, who aligned himself with Trump’s movement, secured a scant 8% support. On Sunday, Trump called on Republicans to vote against Ramaswamy.

“Vivek started his campaign as a great supporter, ‘the best President in generations,’ etc. Unfortunately, now all he does is disguise his support in the form of deceitful campaign tricks,” Trump said on Truth Social. 

“Very sly, but a vote for Vivek is a vote for the ‘other side’ — don’t get duped by this. Vote for ‘TRUMP,’ don’t waste your vote! Vivek is not MAGA.” 

MTG Mocks Hunter’s ‘Temper Tantrum’; Threatens Speaker Over Amnesty Deal

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., ridiculed Hunter Biden’s Wednesday appearance during a contempt of Congress committee hearing, likening him to a “child pitching a temper tantrum” when he gets “caught.” 

Greene’s mocking remarks occurred in an interview on Fox News’ Sunday Morning Futures, where host Maria Bartiromo sought a reaction to Hunter Biden popping into a House hearing where members discussed holding the first son in contempt of Congress for refusing to comply with a subpoena. 

However, Hunter Biden quickly left the hearing as Greene was called upon to speak. 

“It was really telling when he left as soon as [House Oversight Committee] Chairman Comer recognized me to speak. He sat there seemingly unfazed when [Rep.] Nancy Mace was chastising him,” Green told Bartiromo on Sunday

“I’ve been going after Hunter for violating the Mann Act, and that’s trafficking women across state lines. And this is a very serious crime, and we have evidence of that on our Oversight Committee through our investigation, and I was going to bring that up, and I think he knew it,” she added. 

The battle between House Republicans and Hunter Biden stems from an impeachment inquiry into President Joe Biden’s alleged role in the shady business dealings involving his relatives. Biden has largely dismissed the growing evidence that directly contradicts his previous claims he never spoke about business dealings with Hunter Biden. 

Later in the interview, Greene responded to reports that Senate Democrats and Senate Republicans have neared the end of a border bill that many have accused of blatantly greenlighting amnesty and visas for illegal aliens.  

Greene said that she would file a motion to vacate Rep. Mike Johnson, R-La., as House speaker if he supports such a contentious deal, which allegedly would increase green cards by 50,000 a year, provide work visas for some illegal aliens and admit 5,000 illegal aliens per day. If passed, the bill would also allocate $60 billion in aid to Ukraine.

“It upset me so much that this is the deal that the Republicans in the Senate are making, and they want to do this in exchange for $60 billion more for I didn’t know.” Greene said. “And that’s why I told Speaker Johnson if he made that deal in exchange for $60 billion for Ukraine, I would vacate the chair and I still stand by those words.”

Biden Spox Brushes Off Austin’s AWOL Scandal, Cites Work Done at ‘Staff Level’

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) National Security Council spokesman John Kirby faced intense questioning regarding the Pentagon and White House scandal stemming from Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin’s secret hospitalization due to prostate cancer. 

During a Sunday interview on CBS News’ Face the Nation, Kirby fielded tough questions about Austin’s failure to inform his deputy, White House defense officials and President Joe Biden about his New Year’s hospitalization. However, Kirby claimed that work is usually done “at the staff level.”

Host Margaret Brennan queried Kirby on the frequency of direct communication between Biden and Austin, given the ongoing military conflicts in the Middle East, Europe and China.

Kirby asserted that there is “routine, regular” communication between Biden and Austin, pointing to the defense secretary’s involvement in approving military strikes against the Yemen-based Houthis.

“I think it’s important for people to remember that the cabinet officials don’t have to sit and talk every single day to make every decision. A lot of the work that gets done in national security is done at the staff level,” Kirby claimed. 

Brennan challenged Kirby by highlighting the fact that Biden was unaware of the hospitalization. She asked, “But there is a chain of command, and the commander-in-chief didn’t know that his defense secretary was ill.” 

Kirby acknowledged the lack of proper communication between the Pentagon and the White House. “That is a problem and the president has spoken to that,” Kirby claimed. “That is not the way it is supposed to be and something we need more answers to and the Pentagon is investigating this and we’ll see what comes out of that. But that is not the way the process is supposed to work, that is right.” 

The scandal surrounding Austin’s hospitalization began when he failed to notify others of his hospitalization on Jan. 1, following a medical procedure.  

Spending three days in the ICU, Austin belatedly informed the White House on Jan. 4 and Congress on Jan. 5, just 15 minutes before publicly announcing the medical procedure. Notably, Austin’s deputy, Kathleen Hicks, was in Puerto Rico when he was hospitalized.  

According to Walter Reed medical officials, Austin had undergone prostate cancer surgery on Dec. 22 but experienced complications, including nausea and various abdominal, hip and leg problems. A subsequent urinary tract infection prompted his transfer to the ICU, where further examination revealed a blockage of his small intestine caused by fluid obstruction.

No Arrests Made After Pro-Palestinian Rioters Damage WH Fence, Attack Police

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) A group of pro-Palestinian rioters stormed the premises outside the White House on Saturday, attacking law enforcement officials to express their opposition to the U.S.’s support for Israel in its war with Hamas. 

As reported by Fox News, the individuals shouted pro-Palestinian slogans, including “Ceasefire Now!” and “Free, Free Palestine,” while also brandishing Palestinian flags. However, the protest took an aggressive turn as the individuals damaged security fencing.

According to the Secret Service, the pro-Palestinian hecklers damaged some of the fencing, leading to the relocation of some White House staffers and journalists. 

“During the demonstration near the White House complex Jan. 13, a portion of the anti-scale fencing that was erected for the event sustained temporary damage,” the Secret Service claimed, as reported by Fox. “The issues were promptly repaired on site by U.S. Secret Service support teams.”

Video footage shared on Twitter by Border Hawk, depicts the individuals pushing the fence while shouting, “Break it down.” Others chanted, “F*ck, Joe Biden.” In one instance, a man wearing a Palestinian keffiyeh can be seen attempting to jump over the protective fence.

Despite the damage, no individuals were arrested. 

“As a precaution, some members of the media and staff in proximity to Pennsylvania Avenue were temporarily relocated while the issue was being addressed,” the federal law enforcement agency claimed. “The Secret Service made no arrests associated with the march and there was no property damage to the White House or adjacent buildings.” 

Metropolitan Police Department Chief Pamela A. Smith reacted to the protest by acknowledging that some of the protesters threw objects at officers in Lafayette Park, located near the White House. 

“While a majority of today’s demonstration remained peaceful, there were instances of illegal and destructive behavior in Lafayette Park, including items being thrown at our officers,” Smith claimed in a press release.

She added, “We are supporting our partners at the United States Park Police as they investigate and hold those found responsible accountable for their actions.”

Jordan and Comer to Issue New Subpoenas Amid Hunter Biden Plea

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) House Republicans agreed on Sunday to issue a new set of congressional subpoenas to Hunter Biden, responding to the pleas of his attorney, Abbe Lowell.  

Lowell previously argued that the subpoenas issued to Hunter Biden were illegitimate because they were issued before the House formally voted on the impeachment inquiry. 

House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer, R-Ky., and House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, informed Lowell that the House is “prepared to issue subpoenas compelling Mr. Biden’s appearance at a deposition on a new date in the coming weeks.”

First reported by the Washington Examiner, the letter comes against the backdrop of a months-long battle between Hunter Biden and House Republicans leading an impeachment inquiry into scandal-plagued President Joe Biden.

House Republicans had demanded Hunter Biden’s appearance for a behind-closed-doors deposition on Dec. 13. However, Hunter Biden skipped the deposition after Republicans rejected his special treatment request for a public hearing.  

On Dec. 13, Hunter Biden opted instead to hold what seemed to be an impromptu press conference outside the U.S. Capitol to protest the impeachment inquiry. 

On Jan. 12, amid threats of contempt of Congress charges, Hunter Biden claimed that the subpoena seeking his testimony was illegitimate because it was issued before the House formalized the impeachment inquiry. In a letter to House Republicans, Lowell stated that his client was willing to testify before Congress, citing the new House-approved impeachment inquiry. 

In their Jan. 14 letter to Lowell, Jordan and Comer declared that their willingness to issue a new subpoena does not imply agreement with Lowell’s claims that the first subpoena was illegitimate. 

“To be clear, the issuance of these subpoenas does not in any way suggest or imply that the Committees believe the assertions in your January 12 letter to have any merit,” they wrote. “Our willingness to issue these subpoenas is rooted entirely in our interest in obtaining Mr. Biden’s testimony as expeditiously as possible.” 

If Hunter Biden testifies, he would likely avoid facing a contempt of Congress charge.