Senate to Investigate ABC News Debate Collusion w/ Harris Campaign

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) ABC News has landed in hot water once again, now facing a Senate investigation over allegations it colluded with Vice President Kamala Harris’s campaign to rig the presidential debate against President Donald Trump. 

Led by Sen. Roger Marshall, R-Ks., the probe targets ABC President Almin Karamehmedovic and Harris-Walz Campaign Manager Julie Chávez Rodriguez, demanding both release pre-debate correspondence and internal communications. 

Marshall’s probe comes as ABC News faces mounting accusations of leftist bias during the debate, where anchors David Muir and Linsey Davis fact-checked Trump exclusively. Meanwhile, Harris went unchallenged despite making at least 25 false claims, according to a Federalist report. 

“The American people deserve transparency and accountability from the mainstream media and full accounting of whether ABC News coordinated with the Harris campaign to skew the debate’s questions and fact-checking in favor of the Vice President,” Marshal wrote Wednesday in a three-page letter. 

Karamehmedovic and Chávez Rodriguez have until Sept. 27 to provide the requested information. It is unclear whether they intend to comply. Headline USA reached out to Karamehmedovic for comment on Thursday morning but received no immediate response.

In his letter, Marshall cited evidence of ABC News’s leftist bias, pointing to a Media Research Center report that found Muir’s coverage of Harris was 100% positive, while coverage of Trump was strikingly 93% negative.

Muir did not respond to Headline USA’s request for comment or an interview after his debate hosting led to a 12% drop in viewership.  

Muir dismissed the criticism as “noise” during an interview on ABC News’s Live with Kelly & Mark with co-hosts Kelly Ripa and Mark Consuelos.

Read Marshall’s letter to ABC News and the Harris campaign below.

Editor’s Note: This article has been updated to clarify that Karamehmedovic did not respond to Headline USA’s request for comments sent on Thursday morning, after publication—rather than on Wednesday night.

Kamala Morphs into Hispanic Señorita w/ Latest Accent Appropriation

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) Vice President Kamala Harris seemed to embody the Tucker Carlson-appointed nickname “Carmela Harris” on Tuesday, debuting an apparent new accent during a speech.

On Tuesday afternoon, Harris came under scrutiny from social media critics who noticed what appeared to be a Hispanic accent while speaking to the Congressional Hispanic Caucus. 

“We Love you!” a woman shouted to Harris, who replied, “I love you back,” with an exaggerated and drawn-out emphasis on the phrase “I Love You,” pronouncing it more like “Aye Luh U.”

Critics quickly called out Harris’s unusual enlargement of the vowel sounds, with journalist Greg Price calling this “her most cringe accent yet.” Trending Politics co-founder Collin Rugg agreed, adding, “Harris has pulled out multiple accents on the campaign trail however this one is one of the most interesting to date.”

Harris’s latest accent comes as she faces questions about her racial identity and the authenticity of her exchanges with supporters. The vice president, currently running for president, switched her accent during a campaign rally in Atlanta, Georgia, last month. 

“You all helped us win in 2020 and we gon’ do it again in 2024,” Harris exclaimed to Atlanta voters, notably dropping the “g” in “going” to produce “gon,” and slurring “2024” as “twenny-foh.” 

She revived the same tone during the 2024 Phoenix Awards Dinner. “Hello to all my Divine Nine brothers and sisters, my sorors, and all my HBCU brothers and sisters,” Harris said, alluding to her sorority membership during her time at Howard Universit. 

This time she tellingly emphasizing “Divine Nine” as “Dee-vahhn Nahhn” and pronounced “brothers and sisters” as “bruh-thuhs and sih-stuhs,” prompting many to question whether Harris was mocking a Southern accent. These are just some of the examples.

President Donald Trump appeared to take note of Harris’s shifting identity, remarking during a Q&A that she had previously emphasized her Indian heritage before later focusing on her Black background. 

Early in her career, several news outlets described Haris as Indian-American. During her Senate career, Harris appeared to fully embrace her Black identity, pointing to her Jamaican-born father. 

Others have suggested that Harris’s changing tone during speeches is an example of “code switching,” the practice of alternating one’s tone depending on the environment.

Teamsters Snub of Kamala Could Mean Trouble in ‘Rust Belt’ States Like Pa., Mich. and Wisc.

(Dmytro “Henry” Aleksandrov, Headline USA) It was recently revealed that one of the major labor unions in the country, the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, refused to endorse anyone for president after their member polling indicated that union members are more likely to support Donald Trump instead of Kamala Harris.

According to Trending Politics co-owner Colin Rugg, the electronic member polling showed that 59.6% of members supported Trump, and only 34% supported Harris.

“The decision comes just two days after union leaders and members met privately with Kamala Harris who was apparently unsuccessful in winning some of them over. This is the first time in about three decades that the Teamsters will not endorse a candidate,” Rugg wrote.

In his post, Rugg also provided a video clip of Teamsters President Sean O’Brien, who said that he gave a speech at the Republican National Convention because Republicans, unlike Democrats, actually responded to the request to speak. O’Brien added that the union’s members didn’t like this fact, which probably explains Trump’s popularity among union members.

The Trump-Vance campaign released a statement that responded to recent news.

“Today, Kamala Harris suffered a crushing blow as she became the first Democrat in almost three decades to NOT be endorsed by the International Brotherhood of Teamsters,” the campaign wrote.

In its statement, the campaign also included multiple reports from different news sources, including the ones with a far-left bias, like the Washington Post, which claimed that the recent news was a bad sign for the Harris-Walz campaign, adding that this was “a blow to the Democratic Party.”

The Teamsters have a strong presence in battleground states and could play an outsize role in the election,” the Post reported.

The recent news could result in Trump winning the upcoming election, especially in the “Rust Belt” swing states, such as Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin.

Americans Can Now Renew Passports Online, Bypass Cumbersome Paper Applications

(Headline USA) Americans can now renew their passports online, bypassing a cumbersome mail-in paper application process that often caused delays.

The State Department announced Wednesday that its online renewal system is now fully operational, after testing in pilot programs, and available to adult passport holders whose passport have expired within the past five years or will expire in the coming year.

It is not available for the renewal of children’s passports, for first-time passport applicants, for renewal applicants who live outside the United States or for expedited applications.

“By offering this online alternative to the traditional paper application process, the Department is embracing digital transformation to offer the most efficient and convenient passport renewal experience possible,” Secretary of State Antony Blinken said in a statement.

The department said it estimated that about 5 million Americans would be able to use this service a year. In 2023, it processed 24 million passports, about 40% of which were renewals.

After staffing shortages caused mainly by the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in lengthy passport processing delays, the department ramped up hiring and introduced other technological improvements that have reduced wait times by about one-third over last year.

It says most applications are now completed in far less than the advertised six weeks to eight weeks, and the online renewal system is expected to further reduce that.

The system will allow renewal applicants to skip the current process, which requires them to print out and send paper applications, photos and a check by mail, and instead to submit their documents, photo and payment through a secure website, www.Travel.State.Gov/renewonline.

There will be no change to the existing passport processing fees, which are currently $130 for a regular renewal.

Assistant Secretary of State for Consular Affairs Rena Bitter, whose bureau oversees passport processing, said the department hoped to expand the program in the coming years to possibly include Americans living abroad, those seeking to renew a second passport and children’s passports.

“This is not going to be the last thing that we do,” she told reporters. “We want to see how this goes and then we’ll start looking at ways to continue to make this service available to more American citizens in the coming months and years.”

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

Autopsy: Calif. Couple Killed at Nudist Ranch Died from Blows to Their Heads

0

(Headline USA) A Southern California couple whose bodies were found under their neighbor’s home in a nudist ranch died from “blunt force trauma to the head,” an autopsy found.

The San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department released the cause of death of Daniel Menard, 79, and his wife Stephanie, 73, on Tuesday, the Los Angeles Times reported.

The couple and their dog were last seen on Aug. 24 and reported missing to the Redlands Police Department by a worried friend.

Five days after they went missing, searchers found their remains in bags in a concrete bunker underneath the home of their neighbor Michael Royce Sparks.

Sparks, 62, was arrested on homicide charges and pleaded not guilty during his arraignment on Sept. 9.

Authorities have not revealed a motive in the killings, but a neighbor told local media that Sparks hated the couple and that they feuded over a tree between their properties.

Sparks ″didn’t like the Menards,” neighbor Tammie Wilkerson told KTTV-TV. “He said it many times that he hated them, but I never thought he’d do something like this.”

The couple’s unlocked car was found near their residence in Olive Dell Ranch, and both their phones and Stephanie Menard’s purse were still inside their home. Daniel Menard was described as a diabetic with dementia.

Olive Dell Ranch is a family, and couples-friendly nudist resort in Colton, California, that is an “ideal spot to enjoy the nudist/naturist lifestyle whether visiting for the day or an overnight stay,” according to its website.

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

The Party’s Over: Iconic Tupperware Brands Seeks Chapter 11 Bankruptcy

(Headline USA) Tupperware Brands, the company that revolutionized food storage decades ago, has filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection.

Orlando, Florida-based Tupperware plans to continue operating during the bankruptcy proceedings and will seek court approval for a sale, “in order to protect its iconic brand,” the company said just before midnight on Tuesday.

The company is seeking bankruptcy protection amid growing struggles to revitalize its business.

Tupperware sales growth improved some during the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic, but overall sales have been in steady decline since 2018 due to rising competition. And financial troubles have continued to pile up for the company.

Doubts around Tupperware’s future have floated around for some time. Last year, the company sought additional financing as it warned investors about its ability to stay in business and its risk of being delisted from the New York Stock Exchange.

The company received an additional non-compliance notice from the NYSE for failing to file its annual results with the Securities and Exchange Commission earlier this year. And Tupperware had continued to warn about its ability to stay afloat in more recent months, with an August securities filing pointing to “significant liquidity challenges.”

In Tuesday’s bankruptcy petition, Tupperware reported more than $1.2 billion in total debts and $679.5 million in total assets. Shares for the company have fallen 75% this year and closed Tuesday at about 50 cents apiece.

“The reality is that the decline at Tupperware is not new,” Neil Saunders, managing director of GlobalData, said in Wednesday commentary. “It is very difficult to see how the brand can get back to its glory days.”

Saunders explained that many consumers have been migrating to cheaper home storage brands—noting that competition has intensified over years, particularly with the rise of online platforms like Temu and retailers like Target also beefing up their own home storage and kichenware brands.

Tupperware’s roots date back to 1946. According to the company’s website, shortly after the Great Depression, chemist Earl Tupper found inspiration while creating molds at a plastics factory—setting out on a mission to create an airtight seal for a plastic container, similar to that on a paint can, to help families save money on food waste.

The brand experienced explosive growth in the mid 20th century—particularly with the rise of Tupperware parties, first held in 1948. Tupperware parties notably gave many women a chance to run their own businesses out of their homes, selling the products within social circles.

The system worked so well that Tupperware eventually removed its products from stores. And in Tuesday’s bankruptcy announcement, the company maintained that there were no current changes to Tupperware’s independent sales consultant agreements.

According to court documents published Tuesday, Tupperware currently employs more than 5,450 employees across 41 countries—and additionally partners with global sales force of over 465,000 consultants who sell products on a freelance basis in nearly 70 countries.

Tuesday’s announcement also pointed to aims to “further advance Tupperware’s transformation into a digital-first, technology-led company,” possibly signaling a move toward increased reliance of sales on the brand’s website or perhaps more online-focused marketing, although the company did not provide exact specifics.

In a statement, Tupperware President and CEO Laurie Ann Goldman acknowledged Tupperware’s recent financial struggles and said that the bankruptcy process is meant to provide “essential flexibility” as the company pursues this transformation. She also maintained that the brand wasn’t going anywhere.

“Whether you are a dedicated member of our Tupperware team, sell, cook with, or simply love our Tupperware products, you are a part of our Tupperware family,” Goldman said in a statement. “We plan to continue serving our valued customers with the high-quality products they love and trust throughout this process.”

Goldman, who previously served as CEO of Spanx, was appointed as Tupperware’s CEO in October 2023—as part of larger leadership change ups. The company has appointed a new management team within the last year.

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

Flip-Flopping Kamala Dodges Question on Whether She Still Backs Reparations

(Headline USA) Vice President Kamala Harris dodged a question about whether she still supports reparations during a softball interview Tuesday with the National Association of Black Journalists, NBC News reported.

Politico writer Eugene Daniels, the NABJ moderator, noted that Harris had previously expressed support for a federal “commission,” modeled after those in blue states such as California, to consider a national reparations policy.

“Would you as president take different actions to create this commission, or do you believe it should happen in Congress?” Daniels asked Harris.

The vice president responded with a lengthy, vague non-answer.

“We need to speak truth about the generational impact of our history, in terms of the generational impact of slavery, the generational impact of redlining, of Jim Crow laws,” Harris began.

“I could go on and on and on,” she continued. “These are facts that have impact, and we need to speak truth about it. And we need to speak truth about it in a way that’s about deriving solutions.”

Harris added that she believed Congress, not the president, needed to take action on reparations.

“I’m not discounting the importance of any executive action, but ultimately Congress—because, if you’re going to talk about it in any substantial way, there will be hearings, there will be a level of public education and dialogue,” she said.

Harris was not asked whether she would encourage congressional Democrats to back a bill she co-sponsored while in the Senate, which would have created a federal committee to “study the history of U.S. slavery” and examine possible reparations payments to black Americans.

Harris’s refusal to commit to backing a reparations plan comes just one week after the New York City Council passed a bill to establish its own reparations commission.

The measure calls for the creation of a “truth, healing, and reconciliation” task force to study the effects of slavery in New York City and whether monetary reparations are necessary.

During her failed 2019 presidential primary campaign, Harris offered a far less ambiguous reply while speaking to black activist Al Sharpton during a visit to his National Action Network.

“When I am elected president, I will sign that bill,” she said.

Harris indicated in a recent sit-down interview with CNN’s Dana Bash that her values haven’t changed since her controversial 2019 run, despite countless flip-flops on policy.

Woman in Critical Condition after Hospital Demands 3 Vaccines for Blood Transfusion

(Dmytro “Henry” Aleksandrov, Headline USA) Big Pharma recently exposed itself as a very corrupt industry that doesn’t care if regular people die as a result of them earning a lot of money. 

It was recently reported that Alexis Lorenze, a Florida native currently living in California, was admitted to the University of California, Irving Medical Center for Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria.

However, doctors at the hospital refused to treat Lorenze unless she received vaccines for tetanus, meningitis and pneumonia before a blood transfusion. Lorenze posted a video explaining the situation on different social media platforms, stating that all three vaccines led to a severe reaction since they were reportedly administered simultaneously.

According to Times Now News, Lorenze contacted a lawyer after the incident, blaming the center for what happened to her.

In one of her other social media posts, Lorenze asked people following her to make sure “this place gets sh*t down as my last wish.”

Lorenze’s father, Todd, also had been documenting her condition on Facebook, showing in the photos of his daughter with a swollen face and dark red marks on her body.

In his latest Facebook update, Todd wrote that his daughter is currently in the intensive care unit and will soon be transferred to another hospital. Investigative journalist Steve Kirsch posted a video with two Vaccine Safety Research Foundation officials confirming that Alexis will be transferred to a different place.

Times Now News also reported that the hospital has not responded to the allegations yet.

“The hospital is allegedly now intentionally neglecting her, and gaslighting her visual and obvious vaccine injuries,” @DiedSuddenly_ wrote.

After Lorenze’s posts went viral, many people expressed their support and prayers for her fast recovery, while also creating donation pages on GiveSendGo and VSRF, an Initiative of the Kirsch Foundation.

One of the people from the Vaccine Safety Research Foundation also recently released a statement saying that Alexis is now doing much better because she finally received the treatment she needed.

‘Shut Up’: Pharrell Williams Blasts Fellow Celebrities Over Political Endorsements

(Headline USA) Singer and producer Pharrell Williams said this week that he’s not happy about his fellow celebrities making political endorsements, arguing no one cares what they think about politics, as reported by The Blast.

“I don’t do politics,” Williams told the Hollywood Reporter.

“In fact, I get annoyed sometimes when I see celebrities trying to tell you [whom to vote for],” he added. “I’m one of them people [who says], ‘What the heck? Shut up. Nobody asked you.’”

Williams said celebrities should be far more concerned about taking “action” in support of causes they believe in.

“I would rather stay out of the way, and obviously, I’m going to vote how I’m going to vote,” he said. “I care about my people and I care about the country, but I feel there’s a lot of work that needs to be done, and I’m really about the action.”

He touted the two nonprofits he founded—YELLOW, which focuses on education equality, and Black Ambition, which supports black and Hispanic entrepreneurs.

“Those are the things I lean into,” Williams said. “I’m not an activist, but I believe in action. But I do believe in activists, and you need everybody.”

Williams’s comments come not long after Taylor Swift prominently endorsed Vice President Kamala Harris following her Sept. 10 debate against former President Donald Trump.

“I’m voting for @kamalaharris because she fights for the rights and causes I believe need a warrior to champion them,” Swift said in an Instagram post. “I think [Harris] is a steady-handed, gifted leader and I believe we can accomplish so much more in this country if we are led by calm and not chaos.”

Polls afterwards showed that Swift’s endorsement produced no significant bump for Harris’s campaign.

Former President Donald Trump responded to Swift in a Truth Social post on Sunday: “I HATE TAYLOR SWIFT!”

Singer Billie Eilish and her brother Phinneas also endorsed Harris this week, claiming Harris and her running mate, Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, “are fighting to protect our reproductive freedom, our planet and our democracy.”

But more so than in past years, Hollywood seems to be holding its tongue over its normally insufferable advocacy, especially where Trump is concerned.

It may be that some feel chastened by the Biden years and fear that a tone-deaf Harris endorsement could negatively affect their own brand, alienating potential fans.

Rapper Usher Raymond seemed to echo those concerns during an appearance on The View last week when co-host Joy Behar attempted to use Swift’s endorsement to pressure him into vocalizing his support for Harris.

Although he acknowledged that he planned to vote for the Democrat, he said he preferred to keep his opinions on the matter to himself.

“I don’t get too deep into politics,” he said, although “I obviously have been watching [the race] like everybody else.”

Similarly, wrestler-turned-movie-star Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson, who was an outspoken anti-Trumpist in 2020, revealed that he would not be making an endorsement this election season—and even commended Trump for his fearlessness following a July 13 assassination attempt.

Fed Fulfills Promise w/ Half-Point Rate Cut, but Reaction Dampened by Expectation

0

(Headline USA) The Federal Reserve on Wednesday cut its benchmark interest rate by an unusually large half-point, a dramatic shift after more than two years of high rates that helped tame inflation but also made borrowing painfully expensive for American consumers.

The rate cut, the Fed’s first in more than four years, reflects its new focus on bolstering the job market, which has shown clear signs of slowing. Coming just weeks before the presidential election, the Fed’s move also has the potential to scramble the economic landscape just as Americans prepare to vote.

On Wednesday, however, that reaction seemed muted, with the stock market initially appearing to react negatively to the rate cut, which had been announced previously with 100% certainty although the size was uncertain. Some suggested that the reaction to the current cut had already been reflected in what has generally been a robust bull market this year, despite some recent anxieties over a possible recession.

The central bank’s action lowered its key rate to roughly 4.8%, down from a two-decade high of 5.3%, where it had stood for 14 months as it struggled to curb the worst inflation streak in four decades, the result of a perfect storm of factors that included emergency COVID spending, supply-chain shortages, caps on domestic energy production and the massive ongoing spending sprees that the Biden administration proceeded to implement even as warning signs signaled that federal belt-tightening was in order.

The root cause of inflation is the government continuing to “create” additional unbacked currency or debt, effectively devaluing the existing supply.

Inflation, which is the compounding rate of dollar devaluation in a given interval, has eased from a peak of 9.1% in mid-2022 to a three-year low of 2.5% in August, not far above the Fed’s 2% target, but still higher than what it was when the Biden–Harris administration began.

The Fed’s policymakers signaled that they expected to cut their key rate by an additional half-point in their final two meetings this year, in November and December. And they envision four more rate cuts in 2025 and two in 2026.

In a statement and in a news conference with Chair Jerome Powell, the Fed came closer than it has before to declaring victory over the current inflation crisis.

“We know it is time to recalibrate our [interest rate] policy to something that’s more appropriate given the progress on inflation,” Powell said.

“We’re not saying, ‘mission accomplished’ … but I have to say, though, we’re encouraged by the progress that we have made,” he continued. “The U.S. economy is in a good place, and our decision today is designed to keep it there.”

Though the central bank now believes inflation is largely defeated, many Americans remain upset with still-high prices for groceries, gas, rent and other necessities.

Rate cuts by the Fed should, over time, lead to lower borrowing costs for mortgages, auto loans and credit cards, boosting Americans’ finances and supporting more spending and growth. Homeowners will be able to refinance mortgages at lower rates, saving on monthly payments, and even shift credit card debt to lower-cost personal loans or home equity lines.

Businesses may also borrow and invest more. Average mortgage rates have already dropped to an 18-month low of 6.2%, according to Freddie Mac, spurring a jump in demand for refinancings.

“It’s a step in the right direction,” Laura Rosner–Warburton, senior economist of MarcoPolicy Perspectives, said of Wednesday’s Fed move.

The additional rate cuts it indicated it will make, she said, will “prevent risks from building and the unemployment rate from rising. They are trying to keep the economy in good shape.”

In an updated set of projections, the policymakers collectively envision a faster drop in inflation than they did three months ago but also higher unemployment.

They foresee their preferred inflation gauge falling to 2.3% by year’s end, from its current 2.5%, and to 2.1% by the end of 2025. And they now expect the unemployment rate to rise further this year, to 4.4%, from 4.2% now, and to remain there by the end of 2025. That’s above their previous forecasts of 4% for the end of this year and 4.2% for 2025.

Powell was pressed at his news conference about whether the Fed’s decision to cut its key rate by an unusually large half-point is an acknowledgement that it waited too long to begin reducing borrowing rates.

“We don’t think we’re behind,” he replied. “We think this is timely. But I think you can take this as a sign of our commitment not to get behind. We’re not seeing rising [unemployment] claims, not seeing rising layoffs, not hearing from companies that that’s something that’s going to happen.”

He added: “There is thinking that the time to support the labor market is when it’s strong and not when you begin to see the layoffs. We don’t think we need to see further loosening in labor market conditions to get inflation down to 2%.”

The Fed’s next policy meeting is Nov. 6-7—immediately after the presidential election. By cutting rates this week, soon before the election, the Fed is risking attacks from Trump, who has argued that lowering rates now amounts to political interference.

Yet, Politico has reported that even some key Senate Republicans who were interviewed expressed support for a Fed rate cut this week.

Powell—whom Trump has already pledged to fire if he is re-elected—pushed back against any suggestion that the Fed shouldn’t cut rates so close to an election.

“We’re not serving any politician, any political figure, any cause, any issue,” he said.

“It’s just maximum employment and price stability on behalf of all Americans. And that’s how the other central banks are set up, too,” he continued. “It’s a good institutional arrangement, which has been good for the public, and I hope and strongly believe that it will continue.”

The Fed’s move Wednesday reverses the inflation-fighting effort it engineered by raising its key rate 11 times in 2022 and 2023.

Wage growth has since slowed, removing a potential source of inflationary pressure. And oil and gas prices are falling, a sign that inflation should continue to cool in the months ahead.

Consumers are also pushing back against high prices, forcing such companies as Target and McDonald’s to dangle deals and discounts.

The Fed’s decision drew the first dissent from a member of its governing board since 2005. Michelle Bowman, a board member who has expressed concern in the past that inflation had not been fully defeated, said she would have preferred a quarter-point rate cut.

But the Fed’s policymakers as a whole appear to recognize that after years of strong job growth, employers have slowed hiring, and the unemployment rate has risen nearly a full percentage point from its half-century low in April 2023 to a still-low 4.2%. Once unemployment rises that much, it tends to keep climbing.

At the same time, the officials and many economists have noted that the rise in unemployment this time largely reflects an influx of people seeking jobs—notably new immigrants and recent college graduates—rather than layoffs.

It also reflects an adjustment in the dishonest data that was previously pushed by Biden’s Bureau of Labor Statistics for much of the past year. Last month, BLS acknowledged in a downward revision that the numbers were significantly lower than it had long claimed.

Some suspected that the bureau was using the data as a means to manipulate the Fed after gaslighting the public about the health of Biden’s economy, much as Democrats gaslit the public about the president’s own mental health.

The Fed’s attention now is “preserving the health of the labor market and preventing unnecessary damage to the economy from a pretty restrictive [interest rate] stance,” said Rubeela Farooqi, chief U.S. economist at High Frequency Economics.

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press