Blown-Up Hezbollah Pagers, Walkie-Talkies Spark Debate Over U.S. Swamp Doing Same to Americans

Dmytro "Henry" Aleksandrov
-
0
Blown-Up Hezbollah Pagers, Walkie-Talkies Spark Debate Over U.S. Swamp Doing Same to Americans

(Dmytro “Henry” Aleksandrov, Headline USA) After Israel blew up pagers and walkie-talkies of terrorists from Hezbollah, some Americans on social media platforms started thinking about whether the United States government, which the Left currently controls, would do something like that to people who oppose them, conservatives.

The Washington Free Beacon also reported that after the blow-up operations happened, Lebanon, the country where Hezbollah operates, banned pagers and walkie-talkies on all flights from Beirut, the capital and the largest city of the country.

Aside from the predictable responses from the “Squad” members like Rep. Rashida Tlaib, D-Mich., and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., condemning Israel’s decision to blow up the electronic devices while never bothering to criticize Hezbollah and other terrorist organizations, like Hamas, for murdering innocent people in Israel, both Jews and non-Jews, there was also a debate that sparked on Twitter regarding whether the current leftist regime would do something similar to conservatives.

“Hope you are enjoying the news that your government can remotely detonate pagers. Just know that your smartphone has a lot more potential power than an old pager. Here is a video of an iPhone being induced to explode,” @Stephen19718352 wrote in the first post on his thread.

Stone acknowledged some people’s skepticism regarding whether the same thing could be done to phones but then explained his theory.

“People think that when [lithium] batteries overheat, they simply melt, but it’s all a matter of how fast the reaction happens. For instance, in cylindrical cell EV batteries, often the mitigation tactic [is] to surround the cells in a medium that will slow, not stop the reaction. When a cell like that goes off, there really isn’t anything you can do to stop it,” he wrote.

Stone then wrote about how smartphones control this problem because they have a series of fuses and “failsafes,” adding that if someone as powerful as the American government were able to bypass that, it would be quite possible to do the same thing Israel did, except with a different type of an electronic device.

When other people on the platform opposed the idea, those who agreed with Stone shared a scientific study showing that a lithium battery could blow up a garage door on a building.

Stone also reminded the skeptics that even electric cars could be hacked, showing a video of people doing just that.

Ex-Border Chief Ordered Not To Report Border-Crossers w/ Ties to Terrorism

Editor 1
-
0
Ex-Border Chief Ordered Not To Report Border-Crossers w/ Ties to Terrorism

(Bethany Blankley, The Center Square) Retired San Diego Border Patrol Chief Patrol Agent Aaron Heitke said he was instructed by the Biden administration to not publicize arrests of illegal border crossers identified as “Significant Interest Aliens” with ties to terrorism.

Heitke testified before a House Committee on Homeland Security hearing on Wednesday about how Biden–Harris “open border policies have undermined our safety and security.”

“We had an exponential increase in Significant Interest Aliens … with significant ties to terrorism,” illegally entering in the U.S. Customs and Border Protection San Diego Sector, he said.

Prior to the Biden–Harris administration, the sector averaged 10 to 15 SIAs per year. “Once word was out that the border was far easier to cross, San Diego went to over 100 SIAs in 2022, way over 100 SIAs in 2023 and more than that this year,” he said.

“These are only the ones we caught,” meaning the number likely is higher because of the volume of gotaways, those who illegally cross the border and are not apprehended.

“At the time, I was told I could not release any information on this increase in SIA’s or mention any of the arrests,” Heitke testified. “The administration was trying to convince the public that there was no threat at the border.”

His testimony came as the greatest number of individuals on the U.S. federal terrorist watch list have been apprehended under the Biden-Harris administration of 1,856 since fiscal 2021 through August, the Center Square reported.

None of this would have happened if current federal laws enacted by Congress were enforced, he said.

“The only true consequence we have to slow down and discourage people from coming to the United States illegally is sending them back to their country of origin,” required under current law, Heitke said.

Under the Biden–Harris administration, Border Patrol agents were instructed to do the opposite, he said. In three and half years, “I saw a steady decrease in countries we could send people back to,” he said.

“For the first time in my 25 years and under five different administrations, whether through neglect or on purpose, I saw a large-scale lapse in our ability to return people to their country of origin,” he added. “The inability to send people home meant that most people being arrested for illegal entry would either have to be detained or released.”

Since January 2021, “on day one,” the Biden–Harris administration “made a point of decreasing the amount of detention space available nationwide,” noting that Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s funding for detention space has steadily been cut and private detention eliminated.

The “open border policies” and “the fact that so many illegal aliens were being released into the United States spread worldwide very quickly,” he said, resulting in an unprecedented influx of illegal entry into the country.

“The impacts to me and my agents were significant,” Heitke said.

“Sectors were ordered to take in and process all the illegal aliens encountered on the border,” he added. “The Border Patrol saw groups of hundreds and thousands coming into the United States and turning themselves in.”

The result was  “80% to 90%, sometimes 100% of the agents on duty [were taken] away from” the southwest border. There were miles of the border unmanned in Texas, Arizona and California, he said, where there was “no agent presence for weeks and months at a time.”

Foreign nationals “who did not want to be caught could simply walk in,” he said, referring to gotaways. They total at least more than 2 million since fiscal 2021, the Center Square first reported.

“We have no idea who and what entered our country over this time. Throughout 2022 and 2023, I sent agents to Texas and Arizona to count gotaways. Those sectors could not even put enough agents in the field to see what they had missed.”

Rep. Anthony D’Esposito, R-N.Y., then asked him, “What information do we have on the millions of known gotaways that have entered this country?”

“None,” Heitke replied.

“Zero information of millions of people—some of which have been found to be on the terror watchlist—we have zero information?” D’Esposito asked.

“Correct.”

Heitke was previously interviewed by the committee last year and described the level of national security threats that existed because they were forced to close checkpoints after an influx of illegal border-crossers shifted to California.

Agents were then required to shift manpower from the field to process and release into the country illegal border crossers, the Center Square reported.

With their agents being pulled from the field, Heitke and others said Americans were unsafe and transnational criminal organizations were exploiting the open border to smuggle people and an unprecedented amount of fentanyl.

“Each time we asked for help in dealing with a new issue, it fell on deaf ears,” he said.

MURDOCK: The Path to GOP Victory Is Charted, but Who Will Lead the Way?

Editor 1
-
0
MURDOCK: The Path to GOP Victory Is Charted, but Who Will Lead the Way?

(Deroy Murdock, Headline USA) House Speaker Mike Johnson is folding like a feminine napkin on spending and election integrity.

After losing Wednesday’s vote on a continuing resolution and the SAVE Act, the Louisiana Republican reportedly will slide into the passenger seat and let Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y. drive for a while.

This fiasco will energize and delight Democrats and enrage and demoralize Republicans less than seven weeks before Election Day, even as mail-in ballots are reaching swing-state voters.

This will jeopardize the House’s GOP majority and tighten Democrats’ tenuous grip on the Senate.

This complicates things for Donald J. Trump. Cackles of joy surely echo through Kamala Harris’s headquarters.

Enough is enough.

Johnson should muster his leadership skills, such as they are, and call Schumer’s bluff. Saving the SAVE ACT will electrify Republicans rather than dim the lights on GOP prospects.

Republicans unanimously support the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act, which excludes foreign citizens from voting in federal elections.

When it passed on July 10, all 216 Republicans assented. Five Democrats concurred, but 198 Dems opposed American-citizen-only federal elections.

SAVE Act - TPPA poll slide
SAVE Act – TPPA poll slide

On this issue, Republicans are severely in sync with the American people, and Democrats are lost in space.

A February 16 Tea Party Patriots poll of 1,000 general-election voters found that 87% believe “proof of United States citizenship should be required to vote in American elections.”

This includes 96% of Republicans, 89% of independents, and 76% of Democrats!

Meanwhile, Republicans splintered Wednesday when 14 fiscal conservatives rejected a continuing resolution with the SAVE Act but without restraints on runaway spending. Two voted present.

Here’s how Johnson can unite his divided caucus:

First, start with the SAVE Act.

Second, add a CR that cuts spending by 1% across the board. Even as a first step, an actual expenditure reduction should satisfy Wednesday’s 16 Republican dissenters.

Third, add House Budget Chairman Jody Arrington’s measure, which would force Congress to stay in Washington and “Get ’er done.”

“Why don’t we, instead of shut the government down, as the threat, shut politicians in?” the Texas Republican asked Fox News’s Maria Bartiromo on Thursday.

“No budget, no appropriations, no recess, no go home,” he continued. “Make us stay here and get our work done, like every American family and business has to do. Put the pressure on us to act responsibly instead of what we do, year in and year out.”

After passing this three-part bill, Republicans should add a dash of stagecraft:

With this legislation in hand, Johnson and every Republican should march on the Senate. As journalists watch, Johnson should meet GOP leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., and declare, “The House hereby delivers this continuing resolution. If the Senate concurs before October 1, there will be no government shutdown.”

House Republicans very publically will have done their duty to keep the government open, reduce spending, limit federal elections to American citizens, and commit themselves to shelter in place to wrap things up before Fiscal Year 2024 ends.

Chuck Schumer then must decide: Should he pass this measure and send it to President Biden to sign? Or should Schumer make Wisconsin’s Tammy Baldwin, Pennsylvania’s Bob Casey, Nevada’s Jacky Rosen, Montana’s Jon Tester, and other Democrats facing re-election explain back home why they padlocked the government rather than squeeze one penny from each budget dollar?

Would Schumer make these incumbents defend suspended federal functions because Democrats want foreign citizens to cast ballots and cancel the votes of American citizens?

Facing constituent wrath, these Democrats might help Republicans pass Johnson’s bill.

These Senate votes could be close. This could keep Kamala pinned down in Washington, poised to break ties, rather than in swing states, dodging journalists.

This strategy would force a high-profile national debate on spending and foreign-citizen voting. These issues dovetail perfectly with voters’ chief concerns: the economy and immigration. This Republican bonanza would do the right thing for America.

It just takes leadership.

Deroy Murdock is a Manhattan-based Fox News contributor.

Shocking Poll: Many Dems Think U.S. Would Be Better Off If Trump Were Killed

Luis Cornelio
-
0
Shocking Poll: Many Dems Think U.S. Would Be Better Off If Trump Were Killed

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) New polling revealed a disturbing number of Democrats believe the nation would be better off if President Donald Trump had been assassinated. 

According to a Napolitan News Service survey released on Wednesday, 28% of Democrats indicated the country would have benefited from Trump’s assassination in response to recent attempts. 

Another 24% were uncertain, while 48% insisted Trump’s assassination would not have benefited the nation. 

These numbers indicate that Democrat voters are disturbingly desensitized to political violence against Trump, who is actively campaigning for the presidency. 

“It is hard to imagine a greater threat to democracy than expressing a desire to have your political opponent murdered,” said Scott Rasmussen, the president of RMG Research. 

Polling data showed that 51% of Democrats do not believe Trump needs increased security. In contrast, 62% of all voters believe his security detail should be elevated. 

Nearly half of Democrats (49%) suggested it was at least somewhat likely that Trump or his campaign were involved in the assassination attempts, while 21% asserted it was very likely. 

About 52% of Republicans believed it somewhat likely that the Democratic Party or the Harris campaign was involved, while 28% said it was very likely. 

“These results are the latest evidence of how polarized the electorate has become this election season,” the Napolitan News Service reported. “Voters for both Trump and Harris overwhelmingly say they can’t understand how a reasonable person could vote for Trump or Harris.” 

The polling comes just months after Trump narrowly escaped an assassination attempt during a July 13 rally in Butler, Pennsylvania.  

In this incident, the shooter, Thomas Matthew Crooks, was killed on the scene after fatally shooting former fire chief Corey Comperatore, who tragically died while shielding his daughters and wife. 

The former president survived yet another assassination attempt on Sept. 15. This time, Ryan Routh allegedly camped out at Trump International Golf Club in Palm Beach, reportedly with the intent to kill, the FBI suggested.

Routh has only been charged with two counts of illegal purchase of a weapon. 

Bank Warns AI Scams Millions w/ Just 3 Secs. of Audio

Victoria Cook
-
0
Bank Warns AI Scams Millions w/ Just 3 Secs. of Audio

(Victoria Cook, Headline USA) The phone is ringing, but you don’t recognize the number. It could be a scam, you think, but maybe your hospital is calling you to confirm your appointment for next week. So you answer. 

Surprised, you hear your daughter’s voice, telling you, in between sobs, that she is in trouble and she needs your help. If you could just send her $300, she can leave this horrible situation.

But that’s not your daughter. The voice that sounds so accurate and human is none other than an artificial-intelligence-generated voice. Her trouble is none other than a ploy by scammers to pull on your heartstrings and get your money.

THREE SECONDS, A LIFETIME OF REGRET

While the above scenario is hypothetical, in reality, scams like this happen every day across the world.

Within the U.S. alone, an average of 2.5 billion scam calls occur per month, breaking down to nine scam calls per individual, reported reported the consumer fraud watchdog True Caller. 

“Scammers only need three seconds of audio to clone your voice,” said Lisa Grahame, chief information security officer at Starling Bank.

Grahame explained that scammers can also use your online videos to identify family members and friends.  

Starling Bank, located in the United Kingdom, is leading a campaign against AI scams. It encourages everyone to choose a safe phrase to use with their loved ones.

Confirming the phrase over the phone acts as a failsafe, eliminating opportunities for scammers to commit successful identity fraud. 

A FINE LINE FOR FREEDOM

Though AI voice copying has led to scams, it also led to parodies of notable public figures saying and doing things they wouldn’t normally. 

Last year alone, audio clips of President Donald Trump, President Joe Biden, and President Barack Obama playing a video game and joking with each other made their way across TikTok, Instagram, and YouTube. 

At its foundation, AI voice copying is a tool. With free AI technologies available at a quick Google search, people have the responsibility and freedom to use those technologies. 

This unbridled freedom may not last for long, however, with politicians and AI companies looking to pass restriction policies. For example, California Gov. Gavin Newsom passed a law this week decreeing that satire and parody of political figures were not permissible if they had the potential to create election disinformation. 

On its face, striking a balance between creative AI usage and nefarious scams appears relatively easy. The intent and results for each are different, even if the tools are the same. The challenge for politicians will be protecting free speech while also protecting their constituents from scammers.

That’s assuming, of course, that the politicians themselves are acting in good faith through the restrictions they are seeking to impose.

RISK VS. REWARD

As AI scams evolve in complexity, concern about how to prevent those scams and keep the truth unobscured grows.

Starling Bank and others hope that increased awareness of the scams will attenuate the negative effects. 

David Hanson, British minister of state at the Home Office with Responsibility for Fraud, joined the Starling Bank initiative against AI scams. 

“AI presents incredible opportunities for industry, society and governments,” Hanson said. “But we must stay alert to the dangers, including AI-enabled fraud.” 

Reporter Suspended over Alleged ‘Relationship’ w/ RFK Jr. after Biden Exposé

Luis Cornelio
-
0
Reporter Suspended over Alleged ‘Relationship’ w/ RFK Jr. after Biden Exposé

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) New York magazine reporter Olivia Nuzzi admitted to a “personal relationship” with former independent presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr., whom she covered during the 2024 election. 

The magazine placed Nuzzi on leave, announcing that the relationship violated its standards around conflicts of interest and disclosures.

“We regret this violation of our readers’ trust,” it noted in an editorial published Thursday.

RFK Jr. downplayed the allegations, stating he met Nuzzi “once in his life” in 2023, “for an interview she requested, which yielded a hit piece.”

This relationship scandal comes just weeks after he suspended his campaign and endorsed President Donald Trump.

Nuzzi did not name RFK Jr. in a press statement, vaguely confirming she had begun a relationship with an individual she had covered.

“The relationship was never physical but should have been disclosed to prevent the appearance of a conflict,” she said, without clarifying what the non-physical relationship entailed.

Nuzzi, previously engaged to Politico reporter Ryan Lizza, expressed regret over not disclosing the relationship. Lizza confirmed the engagement has been called off.

It isn’t clear whether she was still engaged to Lizza during her relationship with RFK Jr., who has been married to actress Cheryl Hines since 2014. 

The timing of the scandal’s publication—first reported by former CNN reporter Oliver Darcy on his blog—raises questions, especially following Nuzzi’s reporting on Biden’s cognitive decline after the “bloodbath” CNN debate and RFK’s endorsement of Trump. 

Her reporting allegedly “‘crossed the line’” by embarrassing the Biden White House, wrote Jordan Schachtel, publisher of The Dossier newsletter. “Since then, the DC ruling class has sought her destruction. Be very wary of these smear attempts,” Schachtel noted. 

The piece—titled “The Conspiracy of Silence to Protect Joe Biden” and published July 4, days after the CNN debate—did not unveil groundbreaking information that conservatives did not already know. However, it marked a clear departure from the left’s shielding of Biden post-debate. 

Mollie Hemingway, editor-in-chief of The Federalist, shared her thoughts, commenting that if “lustful messages from reporters to the Democrats they worship and adore were actually a problem for journalism bosses, about 95% of reporters would have to be suspended.” 

Podcast host Megyn Kelly concurred, questioning whether the scandal was prompted because of the RFK Jr. endorsement of Trump. 

“It is apparently more of a problem when the alleged relationship partner just endorsed Trump and when the reporter doesn’t absolutely loathe Trump and even wrote a long piece on Biden’s addled brain. That kind of shit will really get you in trouble,” Kelly wrote. 

House Ensures Trump’s Protection While 28% of Dems Want Him Dead

Dmytro "Henry" Aleksandrov
-
0
House Ensures Trump’s Protection While 28% of Dems Want Him Dead

(Dmytro “Henry” Aleksandrov, Headline USA) On Sept. 20, 2024, all 405 members of the House of Representatives voted for the bill, HR9106, that would provide more Secret Service protection for presidential and vice presidential candidates. 

Fox News reported that the bill was written to protect Donald Trump since there were already two people who tried to kill him in the last two months.

“Regardless of how every American feels, regardless of how every American intends to vote, it is the right of the American people to determine the outcome of this election. The idea that our election could be decided by an assassin’s bullet should shake the conscience of our nation, and it requires swift action by the federal government,” Rep. Mike Lawler, R-N.Y., stated during debate on the bill that happened on Sept. 19, 2024, as reported by the news source.

Lawler and Rep. Ritchie Torres, D-N.Y., collaborated and introduced the bill.

However, while there was unanimous and bipartisan support among the politicians when it came to acknowledging that Trump should not be murdered, the recent poll among regular Americans showed radically different results.

Napolitan News Service conducted its poll by asking people whether they think that the United States would’ve been better off if Trump had been killed last weekend.

According to the results, 92% of Republicans predictably said that they think Americans wouldn’t benefit in any way if Trump were murdered on Sept. 15, 2024. Even though there were still 47% of regular Democrats who agreed that murdering an innocent person is not something a person should desire, it was revealed that a shocking 28% of Democrats expressed that they wished Trump would’ve died that day.

The poll also indicated that 25% of Democrats said they were unsure about their answer.

If one were to combine the 28% of Trump-hating Democrats with 7% of Republicans agreeing with them in the deathly rhetoric, that would mean 17.5% of Americans, generally speaking, who were polled wished Trump to die.

As expected, conservatives on social media didn’t like the poll’s results.

“Democrats are the most vile, evil, subhumans alive,” @saras76 wrote.

Zerohedge, a popular conservative news source, also made an ironic comment related to the news in its Twitter post.

“[A] party of joy?” @zerohedge wrote.

Another anonymous conservative also suggested that the 25% of Democrats who said that they were not sure also wanted Trump to die but were afraid of potential consequences.

Trump Supporters Celebrate Book Getting on NY Times Bestseller List

Dmytro "Henry" Aleksandrov
-
0
Trump Supporters Celebrate Book Getting on NY Times Bestseller List

(Dmytro “Henry” Aleksandrov, Headline USA) Despite the entire leftist regime opposing Donald Trump for almost a decade, people still support him, and the politician’s latest book became recent evidence of that. 

“I just learned that my newest book, SAVE AMERICA, is a New York Times BEST SELLER! No other book takes you behind the scenes like this coffee table book. I picked each photo, and I can tell you it is FANTASTIC. Get your copy today at [45books],” Trump wrote in one of his Twitter posts.

The New York Times included Trump’s book Save America on the Sept. 22, 2024, Hardcover Nonfiction list, placing it 11th.

“Congratulations to @realDonaldTrump on his latest book, SAVE AMERICA, becoming a NYT best seller!” founder of Winning Team Publishing Sergio Gor wrote.

Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., also congratulated Trump.

“President @realDonaldTrumphas made the NYT Best Sellers list. He just can’t stop winning!” she wrote.

Even the person behind the parody account of the politician congratulated Trump, adding that they were partially the reason why the book became a bestseller.

“I bought 10 copies. Can’t wait to give them as gifts for Christmas. MAGA,” the person behind the parody account wrote.

Shawn Farash, a famous Trump impersonator, also commented on the recent news.

“Nobody writes books like Trump writes books, believe me,” he wrote.

Bo Loudon, a close friend of Barron Trump, also supported Trump.

“President Trump lost over $2 billion of his wealth in office & even donated his salary. He served for free & didn’t use the office to enrich himself. Trump was our FIRST TRUE public servant in a VERY LONG TIME! I will ALWAYS support & love President Trump,” he wrote.

Popular Twitter commenters and political commentators also congratulated Trump.

“Everyone should have a copy of this book. Keep up the great work, Mr. President. Godspeed,” @TaraBull808 wrote.

A book author and business owner, Juanita Broaddrick, also said she bought copies of the book as gifts for Christmas.

Conservatives Go Ballistic After Discovering U.S. Military Branch Reduces White Males from Its Ranks

Dmytro "Henry" Aleksandrov
-
0
Conservatives Go Ballistic After Discovering U.S. Military Branch Reduces White Males from Its Ranks

(Dmytro “Henry” Aleksandrov, Headline USA) The U.S. Air Force recently faced a massive backlash after it was discovered that the military branch is still implementing anti-white practices, which are usually known as DEI policies. 

The Daily Caller revealed in its exclusive article that Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Charles Q. Brown Jr. issued a report in 2022 stating the Air Force’s goal: to ensure that there will be fewer white males working for the military branch.

The slide the Caller obtained stated, “White male population will decline as other demographics increase.”

James Fitzpatrick, director of the Center To Advance Security In America (CASA), told the Caller that Americans are justified in their concerns regarding one of the country’s military branches concentrating on pushing blatant anti-white racism instead of dealing with the threats all around the world.

When the news source released its report and political commentators and influencers shared the story on Twitter, conservatives immediately criticized the Air Force.

“The biggest racists in the world are on the left. And they currently have an insane amount of power in society,” @JohnPNada wrote.

Others asked a question: why a white person, especially a white man, would even bother joining the Air Force if the branch’s leaders hate him?

Even though the question was obviously rhetorical, David Zsutty, the executive director of the Homeland Institute and a former Air Force veteran, responded to it nonetheless.

“White men shouldn’t enlist for a regime that hates them,” he wrote.

Some anonymous accounts on Twitter agreed with Zsutty.

“Imagine dying for people who hate you,” @RFisher1890 wrote.

Other people also pointed out that white men built this country, and now they are hated by it.

“Here’s that systemic racism Democrats have been talking about,” Paul A. Szypula, a popular political commentator on Twitter, wrote.

One of the Donald Trump supporters also stated that the reason why regular people were shocked when they read the Caller’s report was because they didn’t know how much the current American leadership hates white men people.

“They’re doing this stuff everywhere. People have no idea how widespread this anti-White hate is,” @captivedreamer7 wrote.

Biden Hosted Arab Leader w/ Ties to Terrorism at Sept. 11 Summit

Contributing Author
-
0
Biden Hosted Arab Leader w/ Ties to Terrorism at Sept. 11 Summit

(Headline USA) The Biden White House hosted an Arabic leader with ties to a terrorist organization on the anniversary of the 9/11 attacks, according to the Washington Examiner.

On Sept. 11 of this year, President Joe Biden’s National Security Council hosted Shadi Zaza, CEO of Rahma Worldwide, along with several other Arabic community leaders, at a roundtable event.

Unearthed social-media posts show Zaza and Rahma Worldwide have close ties to Hamas. In fact, Zaza and other Rahma Worldwide officials were pictured in Gaza meeting with the Hamas-run Ministry of Social Development just days before Hamas launched its Oct. 7 attack on Israel. 

According to Sam Westrop, director of the Middle East Forum’s Islamist Watch project, Rahma Worldwide “appears to be a key component of a Hamas-aligned network in the United States.” The group has been instrumental in securing U.S. funds for various aid initiatives to Gaza, he added.

Through groups such as Rahma Worldwide, “the federal government is subsidizing terror,” Wenstrop argued.

Rahma Worldwide insisted that its “involvement in Gaza focuses exclusively on humanitarian support while we abide by international standards of aid work, working through recognized channels to ensure the delivery of essential services,” the group said in a statement.

“We refute any suggestion of our support for terror-related activities,” it continued. “Our mission is solely to aid the vulnerable and displaced.”

A spokesperson for Biden’s NSC insisted they were not aware of Zaza and Rahma Worldwide’s connections to Hamas leaders and said the roundtable event that Zaza attended was more focused on countering the Assad regime in Syria than on Gaza.

However, the report will likely raise concerns that Biden’s National Security Council is pushing a deliberately anti-Israel agenda despite the president’s commitment to continue supporting the Jewish state in its fight against Hamas.

The NSC’s own coordinator for intelligence and defense policy, Maher Bitar, is connected to anti-Israel groups, including Students for Justice in Palestine.

“When Deputy National Security Advisor Maher Bitar was at Georgetown, he was on the board of Students for Justice in Palestine—the organization now calling for the elimination of Israel by violent revolution,” former U.S. ambassador to Israel David Friedman revealed. “Personnel is policy, as they say, and Biden/Blinken/Sullivan’s policy is understandably awful and frightening.”

1...1,0541,0551,056...3,850Page 1,055 of 3,850