Kamala Harris Appears at Accused Sex Trafficker Diddy’s Virtual Gathering

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) “Ain’t no party like a Diddy party”—just ask Vice President Kamala Harris.

Embattled music mogul Sean “P. Diddy” Combs enlisted Harris for a 2020 town hall to sound the alarm about COVID-19, a newly resurfaced video revealed. 

Harris, who now faces scrutiny over her ties to the accused sex trafficker, introduced the Combs-led “Black America & Coronavirus” town hall on April 10, 2020. 

Federal authorities arrested Combs on Sept. 16 over disturbing allegations of sex trafficking, racketeering and other sexual crimes, detailed in a damning three-count indictment. 

In her opening remarks, Harris offered nothing but praise for the rapper-turned-mogul. “Sean, I want to thank you because you always have a way of convening and bringing folks together,” Harris gushed, according to the New York Post. 

Notably, Headline USA found that these flattering portions of the live stream—originally aired on Revolt TV, a media company founded by Combs—were absent from the YouTube video of the town hall. 

Instead, the livestream commenced with Harris discussing COVID-19’s impact on Black Americans. 

“Forty percent of the deaths in the United States for COVID-19—40 percent—have been black deaths, despite the fact that we’re only approximately 13 percent of the population,” Harris said in the YouTube version of the town hall. 

Harris then shared a news article about the town hall, thanking Combs for hosting it.

“There’s a lot at stake for our communities right now and it’s critical we bring to the forefront how coronavirus is perpetuating racial inequality and health disparities,” the vice president wrote on April 10 of that same year. 

As part of the town hall, Combs invited a lineup of prominent figures, including Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, CNN commentator Van Jones, leftist activist Angela Rye, Rev. Al Sharpton, rapper Fat Joe and New Orleans Mayor LaToya Cantrell, who is under fire for a sex scandal tied in a federal indictment.

Read the DOJ’s indictment against Combs below.

Trump Rebukes ‘Dumb’ Maher, ‘Bimbo’ Ruhle in Fiery Rebuttal

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) President Donald Trump lashed out at HBO host Bill Maher and his guests after they labeled him a “threat” to democracy during Friday’s broadcast of Real Time with Bill Maher. 

In a Truth Social post, Trump accused Maher of being consumed by “Trump Derangement Syndrome” after featuring MSNBC anchor Stephanie Ruhle and New York Times columnist Bret Stephens to discuss the 2024 election. 

“He is a befuddled mess, sloppy and tired, and every conversation, with B and C list guests, seems to start with, or revert back to, ME!” Trump wrote of Maher in a lengthy post on Saturday morning. 

“This week he had ‘dumb as a rock’ bimbo Stephanie Ruhle, from MSDNC, on the show, along with a Trump hating loser, Bret Stephens, who seemed totally confused and unsure of himself, very much like Maher himself,” Trump added. 

Trump’s remarks came after Maher, Ruhle and Stephens repeatedly called him dangerous while downplaying concerns about Vice President Kamala Harris. For instance, Stephens criticized Harris for avoiding left-wing media but firmly rejected supporting Trump in November.

Trump seized on Stephens’s comments, suggesting The Times columnist should “find another line of work.” Trump also suggested Stephens “seemed totally confused and unsured [sic] of himself.”

In the same post, Trump drew his attention to The Times, adding, “I am driving the FAILING New York Times absolutely crazy, and it is very hard, perhaps impossible, for a writer to write well of me without suffering the wrath of the degenerate editors who, with a push from the top, have gone insane.” 

Footage of Stephens and Ruhle debating how to criticize Trump amid assassination attempts gained traction online, with some conservatives praising Stephens for urging Democrats to tone down their attacks—though he still insisted voters should not back Trump.

Texas Safety Officials Sound Alarm on ‘Special Interest Aliens’ Illegally Entering from Mexico

(Bethany Blankley, The Center Square) Texas Department of Public Safety Lt. Chris Olivarez is sounding the alarm about an increase of “Special Interest Aliens” being apprehended attempting to illegally enter the U.S. from Mexico.

In a social media post, he published a video of an interview between a Texas DPS trooper and a Turkish national, who was with a group of other Turkish men who illegally entered the country and were identified as SIAs.

Each of the SIAs had Turkish passports and were military age men.

The video depicts a female Texas Department of Public Safety trooper interviewing a Turkish national who spoke English. She asked him, “How did you guys make it over here?”

He said, “They found a network in Istanbul and some people took us first to Kuwait.”

When she asked them how they found the network, he replied, “Through Telegram, Instagram,” referring to a chat network and social media site.

He said they paid “$12 grand a person,” and the men with him confirmed they also paid that amount. He also said he didn’t know other people who were apprehended at the same time and standing nearby.

When she asked him what they were doing there in a remote area at the border, he said they were “looking for police to take us.”

“But do you have family, friends, anybody?” the trooper asked. “We have sponsors.”

When asked how they found the sponsors, he said through the network in Istanbul. When asked what a sponsor means, he said, “That means that they are going to take care of our expenses and everything.”

Olivarez said they weren’t the only SIAs that DPS troopers apprehended.

In the last 48 hours, DPS troopers have come across eight SIAs from five countries, all apprehended in a rural area of Normandy, Texas, in Maverick County, he said.

Texas DPS “uses every tool and resource,” working with local, county, and federal law enforcement partners to screen SIAs properly, he said, and “to provide transparency to the American public” about who’s illegally crossing the U.S.–Mexico border.

SIAs are noncitizens who based “on an analysis of travel patterns” are “known or evaluated to possibly have a nexus to terrorism” who “potentially poses a national security risk to the United States,” explained the U.S. Department of Homeland Security.

Having an SIA designation does not necessarily mean the individual is a terrorist but their travel pattern “indicates a possible nexus to nefarious activity (including terrorism) and, at a minimum, provides indicators that necessitate heightened screening and further investigation.”

In 2016 during the Obama administration, DHS Secretary Jeh Johnson ordered DHS to create a “‘multi-DHS Component SIA Joint Action Group’ to drive efforts to ‘counter the threats posed by the smuggling of SIAs.’”

In 2019, the U.S. House Committee on Homeland Security released a report outlining the threat posed by SIAs and “unknown and other potentially dangerous individuals, traveling to the United States using illicit pathways.”

Earlier this week, retired San Diego Border Patrol Chief Patrol Agent Aaron Heitke testified before Congress about how he said the Biden administration instructed him to not publicize arrests of SIAs.

“We had an exponential increase in Significant Interest Aliens … with significant ties to terrorism” illegally entering in the U.S. Customs and Border Protection San Diego Sector, Heitke said.

Prior to the Biden–Harris administration, the sector averaged 10 to 15 SIAs per year. “Once word was out that the border was far easier to cross, San Diego went to over 100 SIAs in 2022, way over 100 SIAs in 2023 and more than that this year,” Heitke said.

“These are only the ones we caught,” meaning the number likely is higher because of the volume of gotaways, those who illegally cross the border and are not apprehended.

“At the time, I was told I could not release any information on this increase in SIA’s or mention any of the arrests,” Heitke testified. “The administration was trying to convince the public that there was no threat at the border.”

His testimony came as the greatest number of individuals on the U.S. federal terrorist watch list have been apprehended under the Biden-Harris administration of 1,856 since fiscal 2021 through August, the Center Square reported.

Legendary NFL Coach Fact-Checks Kamala’s False Claims on Abortion, Citing Scripture

(Alan Wooten, The Center Square) Vice President Kamala Harris’s comments on faith and women drew questions from an NFL Hall of Famer and two-time Super Bowl champion who is also well known for his outspoken religious convictions.

Harris, in a social media post Thursday afternoon, wrote, “One does not have to abandon their faith or deeply held beliefs to agree: The government, and certainly Donald Trump, should not be telling a woman what to do with her body.”

Just over 90 minutes after her post, Tony Dungy, among many, responded.

“Dear VP Harris:” his social media post began. “I hear you make this statement all the time. Exactly what ‘faith’ are you talking about when you say you don’t have to abandon it to support abortion?”

Dungy continued, “Are you talking about the Christian faith that says all babies are made in the image of God (Genesis 1:26), that God places them in the womb (Jeremiah 1:5) and that we should not take any life unjustly (Luke 18:20)?”

“Are you talking about that faith or some nebulous, general ‘faith’ that says we’re good enough, and smart enough to make our own decisions?” he questioned. “What ‘faith’ are you talking about?”

Dungy’s quotes are from the Bible in Genesis, Jeremiah, and Luke. A 2023 Gallup poll said 3 in 4 Americans identify with a specific religious faith, including 68% with a Christian religion, 33% Protestant and 22% Catholic.

Harris and Dungy are Baptists.

By Saturday morning, Harris’ comment had attracted more than 46,000 likes, 10,000 reposts and 17,000 comments. Dungy’s reply attracted more than 104,000 likes, 21,000 reposts and 9,200 comments.

Dungy, 68, is a retired NFL coach. Undrafted out of Minnesota, he played three seasons for Pittsburgh and San Francisco and coached in the league for 22 seasons.

With Mike Ditka and Tom Flores, he is one of only three Pro Football Hall of Famers who won Super Bowls as a player and head coach.

The father of 11 and New York Times No. 1 best-selling author is even more widely known, however, for being passionate about his Christian faith. He’s also seen regularly on Sunday nights as a studio analyst of NFL games.

Abortion has consistently polled as one of the consensus top three issues for Americans leading up to the Nov. 5 election between Harris, the 59-year-old Democratic nominee for president, and Republican former President Donald Trump.

Harris, her party, and her role as No. 2 in the Biden administration have been criticized for not squaring up on women’s issues related to Title IX rules changes. The changes allow men into women’s spaces, such as athletics competitions, prisons and public bathrooms.

As it relates to health care, critics note that during the COVID-19 era the Biden administration gave general discharges to the majority of troops—women and men—kicked out of the armed forces for refusing vaccination.

Man with $2.4 Million House got Subsidized Rent

(Tom Joyce, The Center Square) Gregory Finkelson received a one-year prison sentence for theft of government property because of his fraudulent receipt of hundreds of thousands of dollars in low-income housing benefits in San Francisco, according to the U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of California.

The Honorable James Donato, United States District Judge, imposed the sentence last week.

The Section 8 Certificate Program is a HUD-funded rent subsidy program; the San Francisco Housing Authority administers the program in San Francisco, California.

“The program is intended to help low- and moderate-income families afford housing, and it has income limits and other eligibility requirements that applicants must meet to qualify for assistance,” a release explained

As a part of his plea agreement, the 64-year-old Finkelson admitted that from August 2006 to February 2020, he wrongfully claimed $341,455 worth of Section 8 Program subsidies because he lied and said he did not own his San Francisco residence; he bought the property via a straw purchaser and claimed he was an employee of a company that he owned and operated out of the home.

Finkelson admitted to using the name of a Russian national living in Russia to buy his San Francisco home. He also claimed that this Russian was the landlord and that he paid rent to her. Plus, Finkelson admitted to operating several bank accounts, including one in the Russian’s name. He confessed to using these accounts to conceal the Section 8 subsidies he obtained. He used this money to fund his business, pay off credit card bills, and make payments on a Hawaiian timeshare.

His San Francisco home is now worth $2.4 million.

In a memorandum for the sentencing, the government said that Finkelson kept up his fraudulent conduct even after SFHA acted to kill his Section 8 subsidies. The government contended that his conduct deprived families in need of housing. It also said that his actions hurt public trust, including trust in the government handling people’s tax dollars.

Judge Donato also sentenced Finkelson to three years of supervision following his one-year prison sentence, plus $341,455 in restitution; that is the amount he admitted to stealing from the government.

How Congress Allocates Billions to Fund the Border Crisis Nationwide

(Bethany Blankley, The Center Square) As Americans struggle with high inflationary costs, paying record high grocery costs and energy bills, Congress continues to allocate billions of dollars of taxpayer money to fund services for illegal border-crossers living in U.S. cities.

Prior to the last budget funding showdown in March, House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., said in January that “any bill that does not secure the border is not acceptable.”

He also identified 64 examples of ways he says the Biden-Harris administration “worked to systematically undermine America’s border security.”

In February, House Republicans impeached Department of Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas arguing he was derelict in his duty and violated the public trust by creating a border crisis. One month later, the majority of Republicans who voted to impeach him, passed a spending bill that funded programs he created they maintain are illegal.

While Americans complain about escalating crime caused by illegal border crossers who’ve inundated their communities, Congress funded the programs that brought them there – and are keeping them there – including DHS’ Shelter and Services Program grants funneling billions to primarily Democratic states, counties, cities as well as nonprofits.

Likewise, the U.S. Senate’s “strongest border security bill in history” the White House, Senate and House Democrats keep touting, co-authored by U.S. Sen. James Lankford, R-OK, allocated “an additional $1.4 billion in SSP funds, and provide additional needed tools and resources to respond to historic global migration,” DHS says – to fund caring for illegal border crossers released into the US.

DHS recently announced the latest round of SSP funding of $380 million—a drop in the bucket to overall spending authorized by Congress. This round “augments the $259.13 million in SSP grants that DHS distributed in April 2024 … which was authorized by Congress to support communities that are providing services to migrants,” DHS says.

The April DHS grant money was distributed after Congress in March passed a $1.2 trillion spending package to avoid a so-called government shutdown, despite Johnson’s and others’ claims, about requiring border security as a condition for passing it.

More than $780 million worth of SSP and the Emergency Food and Shelter Program – Humanitarian Awards grants were awarded in fiscal 2023 “which went to organizations and cities across the country,” DHS says. That’s after DHS awarded $640.9 million in fiscal 2024 “to enable non-federal entities to off-set allowable costs incurred for services associated with noncitizen migrant arrivals in their communities,” also authorized by Congress.

Here are examples of fiscal 2023 and fiscal 2024 grant recipients and the amounts they received.

The SSP grants are awarded in phases. One round in fiscal 2024, totaling $40.8 million, was awarded to:

  • City/County of Denver, $5.9 million;
  • District of Columbia, $2.7 million;
  • City of Chicago, $3.8 million;
  • Commonwealth of Massachusetts, nearly $4.9 million;
  • NYC Office of Management and Budget, $20.4 million;
  • City of Philadelphia over $3 million.
  • That’s after $275 million was awarded to 55 recipients in the attached spreadsheet. Top recipients in one round of funding include:
  • New York City’s Office of Management and Budget, $38.8 million;
  • Pima County, Ariz., $21.8 million;
  • Catholic Charities, Diocese of San Diego of $19.5 million;
  • Maricopa County, $11.6 million, among others.

Democratic-led cities also received large payouts in one round of funding:

  • Atlanta, $10.8 million;
  • Chicago, $9.6 million;
  • Denver, $5.8 million.

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts also cashed in, receiving nearly $7 million; the District of Columbia received $8.7 million; Illinois, $9.6 million, all in one round of funding.

Democratic controlled El Paso County has long received federal money to coordinate transporting illegal foreign nationals north to New York City, Chicago and Denver, The Center Square reported; Austin and San Antonio followed suit flying north “guests coming from the border,” to “proactively manage the flow of people” out of their cities.

These grants exclude others awarded through numerous other federal agencies, including FEMA, U.S. Health and Human Services and others.

Gov. Ron DeSantis, R-FL, U.S. Rep. Thomas Massie, R-KY, and several House Freedom Caucus members argue Congress has a constitutional requirement to stop funding the border crisis. DeSantis, a Freedom Caucus member when he served in Congress, has asked, “How many congressmen rail against Biden’s transgressions yet still vote to fund them?”

Massie said in January that “in March, when funding expires, we can put a rider in the next bill that says none of the money hereby appropriated can be used to countermand border security measures of the states.”

This didn’t happen. The majority of Republicans voted to keep spending taxpayer money on these programs. By July, a U.S. House Judiciary Committee report highlighted examples of how Congress was still funding the border crisis.

App Exposes Worst of U.S. Military Housing

(Brett Rowland, The Center Square) An app that allows U.S. service members to anonymously post photos of the conditions in military barracks and dining facilities includes images of mold, mice, maggots, cockroaches, brown tap water and broken AC units, among other problems.

The app, called Hots&Cots, allows registered users to post photos and rate facilities with up to five stars. Founder Rob Evans created the app more than a year ago after a Congressional watchdog called attention to longstanding problems with housing for junior enlisted service members. He said the goal is to push the U.S. Department of Defense to improve conditions, something it promised to do after the 2023 report.

Photos posted on Hots&Cots show maggots at the Army’s dining facilities at Fort Liberty in North Carolina along with thermostats with a reading of 90 degrees indoors. At Fort Moore in Georgia, one user posted a photo of brown water coming out of a bathtub. Another shows moldy cream cheese at a dining facility in New Jersey.

The U.S. Department of Defense did not immediately respond to a request for comment regarding the photos posted on the app.

The site includes dozens of photos of moldy or inedible offerings at military dining facilities across the country. Thermostat photos with uncomfortable temperatures also are common on the site. So are moldy beds. One video on the site shows a service member returning from overseas to a bed covered in mold.

The Center Square wasn’t able to independently verify photos provided to the site, but Evans said the site reviews posts for accuracy.

TCS SUBMITTED: Mold at Schofield Barracks
A user-submitted photo of a mold-covered ceiling at the Army’s Schofield Barracks, on the island of Oahu in Hawaii.

Evans, a veteran, said he started the app after the 2023 report from the Government Accountability Office.

The 118-page report from the U.S. Government Accountability Office laid bare the conditions of the barracks that house some military service members. The report detailed sewage backups, rodent infestation, mold and inoperable fire suppression systems among the safety hazards that U.S. service members living in barracks face. The report found that such conditions undermine military readiness.

After that report, Brendan Owens, assistant secretary of Defense, Energy Installations and Environment and Chief Housing Officer, said the department had failed the troops and vowed to make improvements.

TCS SUBMITTED: Fort Johnson bathroom
A user-submitted photo of a problems in a bathroom at the Army’s Fort Johnson in Louisiana.

The GAO report, which included photos of the conditions in some barracks, prompted Congressional hearings and a Pentagon pledge to do better.”We’re almost a year into this and we’re still not making a lot of progress on the existing infrastructure for our junior enlisted service members,” he said.

Evans said the Pentagon needs to take action.

“The Department of Defense must act sooner rather than later to address the quality of life issues facing our service members,” he said. “Every day that these issues go unresolved is another day that the well-being and morale of those who serve are compromised. It’s time to prioritize the living conditions of our service members to ensure they can focus on their mission without unnecessary distractions.”

U.S. Rep. Richard Hudson, R-N.C., said the problems weren’t because of funding.

“Every year, the Army appropriates money for improving our soldiers’ housing,” he said in a statement. “The problem is that these funds are not being used efficiently to ensure necessary basic living conditions for our servicemembers. The Army needs to get serious about addressing the appalling conditions our soldiers are living in on bases like Fort Bragg and Fort Liberty.”

Problems with barracks, where unmarried junior military members live during initial training and when on base, have existed for decades. That same GAO report found the Department of Defense has not fully funded its facilities program for years leading to a backlog of at least $137 billion in deferred maintenance costs as of fiscal year 2020. That figure includes all facilities, not just barracks.

The report also noted that the U.S. Department of Defense doesn’t know how much it spends to maintain barracks or how much money would be needed to fix them.

In March, Pentagon officials said that the $849.8 billion President’s Fiscal Year 2025 Defense Budget included money to improve military housing.

More recently, in August, the Pentagon launched a new feedback system to help address problems with military housing. The Department of Defense launched the DoD Housing Feedback System, an initiative designed to boost transparency and accountability in privatized military housing. The system allows active-duty service members, and their authorized dependents, to submit feedback on their existing leased unit.

The U.S. Department of Defense also did not immediately respond to a request for comment regarding how the Housing Feedback System has worked since its launch.

Evans said he runs the site’s day-to-day operations for free, but does allow people who value the app to buy him coffee.

Court Mandates 98,000 People Be Allowed to Vote Without Proof of Citizenship

(Headline USA) The Arizona Supreme Court unanimously ruled Friday that nearly 98,000 people whose citizenship documents hadn’t been confirmed can vote in state and local races, a significant decision that could influence ballot measures and tight legislative races.

The court’s decision comes after officials uncovered a database error that for two decades mistakenly designated the voters as having verified their citizenship. The voters already were entitled to cast ballots in federal races, including for president and Congress, regardless of how the court ruled.

Secretary of State Adrian Fontes, a Democrat, and Stephen Richer, the Republican Maricopa County recorder, had disagreed on what status the voters should hold. Richer asked the high court to weigh in, saying Fontes ignored state law by advising county officials to let affected voters cast full ballots.

Fontes said not allowing the voters who believed they had satisfied voting requirements access to the full ballot would raise equal protection and due process concerns.

The high court, which leans Republican, agreed with Fontes. It said county officials lack the authority to change the voters’ statuses because those voters registered long ago and had attested under the penalty of law that they are citizens. The justices also said the voters were not at fault for the database error and also mentioned the little time that’s left before the Nov. 5 general election.

“We are unwilling on these facts to disenfranchise voters en masse from participating in state contests,” Chief Justice Ann Scott Timmer wrote in the ruling.

Of the nearly 98,000 affected voters, most of them reside in Maricopa County, which is home to Phoenix, and are longtime state residents who range in age from 45 to 60. About 37% of them are registered Republicans, about 27% are registered Democrats and the rest are independents or affiliated with minor parties.

Voters can demonstrate citizenship by providing a driver’s license or tribal ID number, or they can attach a copy of a birth certificate, passport or naturalization documents.

Voters are deciding on the constitutional right to abortion and on a state law that would criminalize illegal immigrants for entering Arizona through Mexico at any location other than a port of entry.

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

Chicago Continues Destroying Its Education System, Forces Teachers to Give Illegals Passing Grades

(Dmytro “Henry” Aleksandrov, Headline USA) It was recently reported that not only children who entered the United States illegally were not deported, but the public school teachers in Chicago were forced to give passing grades to these new students.

WGN Radio 720 reported that the teachers wouldn’t even be able to ensure students did some work by themselves since none of them spoke English and none of the teachers spoke Spanish.

“We reached the insanity level of the [“To infinity and beyond!”],” one anonymous person on Twitter wrote, responding to the news and, probably referring to the famous phrase of Bud Lightyear from the Toy Story movies.

As a cheery on top, NBC 5 Chicago reported that the city spent more than $400 million on illegal aliens while dismissing American citizens who were living in Chicago, specifically black people.

The Daily Wire reported that a recent report from the University of Illinois System indicated that only about a fourth of all Illinois public school students are back to pre-pandemic performance levels in English language arts.

However, this was not the most shocking news about the public school system in the state and the city of Chicago.

“Zero students can read or perform math at grade level at this Chicago public school. The Chicago Teachers Union’s solution? More funding. @ChiPubSchools‘ budget has ballooned to $9 billion,” a conservative nonprofit Illinois policy stated.

In his article on Townhall, political commentator and author Larry Elder once again highlighted that the problem is not the money but rather the Democratic politicians’ absent desire to solve it.

“Do not blame lack of money. In 2019, Illinois had enough K-12 money to spend $18,000 per student. In 2021, it came to $24,000 per student. And in 2024, the total amount is about the same, $24,000 per student,” he wrote.

Elder also wrote that the reason why Democrats don’t want to fix the education system in Chicago is because they don’t care about regular Americans living there, instead preferring to steal the taxpayers’ money and send their kids to expensive private schools.

New Rudy Situation? New York May Turn Red after Voting Trump, as Nigel Farage Visits State

(Dmytro “Henry” Aleksandrov, Headline USA) The recent Donald Trump rally in New York made people wonder whether, after many years of Democrats controlling the Big Apple, New Yorkers are finally ready to vote for Trump, a Republican, just like they once voted for Rudy Giuliani in 1993 after Democrats almost destroyed the city.

“When do New Yorkers ever stop for anything? Trump is on his way through the city to his rally in Uniondale, and thousands of New Yorkers have lined the streets to see him. No wonder he believes he can win New York. This is gorgeous,” @BehizyTweets wrote.

The New York Post also reported how thousands of Trump supporters flooded Nassau Coliseum to attend one of Trump’s rallies.

Conservatives on Twitter were positively shocked when they saw what happened, celebrating the potential Trump’s win of the city.

“THIS IS INCREDIBLE! President Trump just walked out to a JAMPACKED arena in New York! If we flip New York red, Kamala is DONE,” a conservative reporter Nick Sortor wrote.

A former gubernatorial candidate, Lee Zeldin, also celebrated that New Yorkers started becoming more supportive of Trump.

“Nassau Coliseum was packed out to see the 47th POTUS tonight on Long Island. President Trump was on fire and on point. So honored to be part of this special night. I was told by an official that 20,000 people were outside as part of the overflow crowd. Incredible rally!” he wrote.

The last Republican mayor of the city was Giuliani, who left the office in 2001. After him, New Yorkers elected Michael Bloomberg in 2002, who quickly separated himself from any political party. After Bloomberg, leftist Bill de Blasio became the city’s mayor in 2014, continuing to implement destructive policies. In 2022, New Yorkers elected Eric Adams, who wasn’t any better either.

However, after voting for the left for many years, New Yorkers got buyer’s remorse mixed with nostalgia for Giuliani, which many videos on social media platforms indicated, showing New Yorkers shaking hands with, hugging and taking photos with a Republican politician.

New Yorkers voted for Giuliani in 1993 because the Democrats almost destroyed the city over the decades of their ruling. According to the videos from the recent rally and the rally that happened in the heart of Bronx, one of the city’s boroughs, it looks like New Yorkers are going to vote for Trump to save the country from being destroyed, just like they did with Giuliani in 1993.

The recent news came as it was reported that Nigel Farage, a famous conservative from the United Kingdom, will speak at the annual New York Young Republican Gala on Dec. 15, 2024.