Radical Minn. AG Keith Ellison Claims DEI Critics Want to ‘Eradicate’ Black People

(Matt Lamb, Headline USA) Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison claimed that opposition to “diversity, equity, and inclusion” in the federal government—including preferential hiring practices—was about harming racial minorities, LGBT people and people with disabilities.

Ellison—a former member of Congress and deputy chair of the Democratic National Committee—made the comments to Bloomberg Law in the context of Vice President-elect JD Vance’s prior legislation to “redefine DEI as discrimination,” according to the news outlet.

“You can’t get rid of DEI and not open the door to racial discrimination,” Ellison told Bloomberg. “To say we’re going to eradicate DEI is saying we’re going to eradicate [b]lack and [b]rown people and women and gay people and people with disabilities.”

The June legislation would prohibit DEI programs at both federal entities and government contractors, and any recipients of taxpayer dollars, according to a news release from Vance’s Senate office.

While there have been some high-profile rollbacks of DEI at the corporate level, such as at Harley Davidson, these initiatives may also just be rebranding within a company, according to CNN.

In an article published Tuesday, it dubiously suggested that companies benefited from the controversial practices. However, four commonly cited studies from McKinsey and Company that purport to make the financial case for DEI have faced scrutiny from scholars who questioned their findings.

Meanwhile, a new study from Rutgers University found that diversity trainings make people more hostile.

Despite having championed himself as an opponent of racism, Ellison himself has a questionable history of promoting bigotry that supports his agenda.

The Gopher State’s top prosecutor, who oversaw the trial for white ex-police officer Derek Chauvin following the Minneapolis death of George Floyd in 2020, was exposed for making untruthful statements about his ties to Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan.

Ellison previously belonged to the notoriously anti-Semitic group but said in 2006, when first running for Congress, that he was no longer involved, according to Jewish News Service.

He made a similar statement in 2016. However, he did indeed meet with Farrakhan at least three times after he entered Congress, including one time in the Nation of Islam leader’s hotel room.

Ellison also has campaigned with an anti-Semitic activist who called Jews “Satanic.”

The Minnesota Democrat also faced accusations of domestic violence at the peak of the #MeToo movement that ultimately may have derailed any aspirations to become DNC chair.

The attorney general’s ex-girlfriend, Karen Monahan, accused him in 2018 of dragging her off their bed and yelling obscenities at her.

Monahan failed to produce a video that she claimed could substantiate the allegations, but her son, Austin, said he had seen the video of the incident.

“I only know what I saw and I know what’s true,” Austin said at the time. “It was my job to stand up for my mother. … I have no reason to tear down this man.”

Scarcity, Gold, and Inflation: Lessons for Navigating a Volatile Economy

(Money Metals News Service) The Money Metals Midweek Memo celebrates its milestone 50th episode with host Mike Maharrey delivering an in-depth analysis of economic principles, investment trends, and the current state of the gold market.

This episode offers valuable guidance for navigating an increasingly volatile financial landscape.

The Economic Principle of Scarcity

Maharrey begins by highlighting scarcity as the cornerstone of economic thought. Scarcity reflects the reality that human wants are unlimited, but resources are finite. This fundamental principle underscores the necessity of efficiently allocating resources—a task Maharrey argues is best handled by free markets rather than central planning.

He critiques the U.S. healthcare system, noting how scarcity necessitates rationing. Whether through insurance companies denying claims or government healthcare systems imposing long waits, no system can escape scarcity. Free markets, driven by price mechanisms, provide a more efficient approach to distributing limited resources compared to politically driven systems.

The Gold Market: A Case of Misguided Selling

Recent weeks have seen significant selling pressure in the gold market, with prices fluctuating around the $2,000 mark.

Maharrey identifies a paradoxical trend: investors selling gold—traditionally an inflation hedge—amid rising inflation concerns.

This behavior, he explains, is rooted in fears that persistent inflation will prompt the Federal Reserve to slow its pace of interest rate cuts. As gold is a non-yielding asset, higher interest rates often diminish its appeal. Maharrey draws comparisons to the “Bizarro Market Dynamics” of 2023, where inflationary news paradoxically drove gold prices lower.

Inflation: Persistent and Unyielding

Contrary to mainstream narratives, Maharrey challenges the idea that inflation is under control. He points to troubling data:

  • Producer Price Index (PPI) rose 3% year-over-year in November, the highest annual increase since February 2023.
  • Monthly PPI climbed 0.4%, doubling October’s rate.

Surging producer costs are likely to trickle down to consumers, fueling further price increases. Maharrey argues that the Federal Reserve’s modest rate hikes and balance sheet reductions are insufficient to address inflation generated by over a decade of money creation, including $9 trillion during the Great Recession and pandemic eras.

The Federal Reserve’s Tightrope Act

Maharrey critiques the Federal Reserve’s delicate balancing act between controlling inflation and preventing economic collapse. With the national debt exceeding $36 trillion and fiscal 2024 interest expenses surpassing $1 trillion, the economy remains heavily reliant on low interest rates.

This “debt-addicted” system, he contends, makes it inevitable that the Fed will return to easy money policies, including rate cuts and quantitative easing, with severe inflationary consequences.

Lessons from History: Parallels to 2007

Drawing comparisons to 2007, Maharrey warns of eerie similarities to the lead-up to the Great Recession. Back then, stock markets were peaking, the Fed was cutting rates, and mainstream analysts were optimistic—until the financial crisis struck. He also observes similarities to the dot-com bubble, with tech stocks once again reaching frothy valuations.

A Call for Long-Term Thinking

Maharrey urges investors, particularly those holding gold, to resist the herd mentality and focus on long-term trends.

“Don’t jump off a cliff just because everybody else is doing it,” he advises, suggesting that current dips in gold prices may present buying opportunities.

Celebrating 50 Episodes

As the Money Metals Midweek Memo marks its 50th episode, Maharrey reflects on the podcast’s journey and the insights it has offered listeners. He encourages those interested in gold and silver investments to explore options at Money Metals Exchange, especially as the holidays approach.

This milestone episode combines timeless economic lessons with timely market analysis, offering listeners actionable insights to navigate uncertain times.

For more information and updates, visit MoneyMetals.com and subscribe to the podcast.

ABC May Fire Stephanopoulos Over $15M Payout to Trump for Fake ‘Rape’ Claims

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) George Stephanopoulos may soon lose his high-paying position as an ABC News host after the network was forced to pay President-elect Donald Trump millions due to defamatory claims made live on air earlier this year. 

Earlier this week, Disney, the parent company of ABC News, agreed to pay Trump $15 million. The payment stemmed from Stephanopoulos falsely claiming that Trump had been found liable for the ‘rape’ of E. Jean Carroll.

According to Variety, ABC may not renew Stephanopoulos’s contract, which is set to expire in 2025. He currently earns a reported $18 million as the anchor of This Week and Good Morning America.

However, sources said they “aren’t sure if he will stay at the network given the recent turn of events.” 

As reported by Variety: “Sources say Stephanopoulos has been vocal about how unhappy he has been with the settlement and apology. For ABC, the economics of paying an anchor $18 million a year may not make sense as ‘GMA’ isn’t the advertising cash cow it once was.” 

Stephanopoulos’s downfall began during an interview with Rep. Nancy Mace, R-N.C., when he pressed her about her endorsement of Trump. He repeatedly described Trump as being liable for “rape,” a false accusation he made ten times throughout the interview. 

“You’ve endorsed Donald Trump for president. Judges and two separate juries have found him liable for rape and for defaming the victim of that rape,” Stephanopoulos said during the Mace interview.  

Trump responded quickly with legal action against Stephanopoulos and ABC News. While the network attempted to dismiss the case on the grounds of fair reporting protection, a federal judge ruled that there was sufficient evidence for the case to proceed to trial. 

Both Stephanopoulos and Trump were ordered to appear for depositions. However, ABC News chose to settle with Trump’s attorneys, avoiding a costly and humiliating trial. 

In addition to the $15 million payment, ABC News agreed to pay Trump $1 million in attorney fees and published an apology in a news report about the March interview with Mace. 

Trump Considers Privatizing USPS

(Dmytro “Henry” Aleksandrov, Headline USA) President-elect Donald Trump recently suggested that he may privatize USPS, resulting in many bureaucrats working for the federal government losing their jobs.

Three anonymous sources told the Washington Post that Trump discussed the potential privatization of the Postal Service at his Mar-a-Lago estate with Howard Lutnick, his pick for commerce secretary and the co-chair of his presidential transition.

One of the inside sources also said that earlier this month, Trump asked a group of transition officials whether he should privatize the organization.

On Dec. 16, Trump responded to a question by one of the reporters, confirming that he is discussing the privatization of the USPS.

“Not the worst idea I’ve ever heard. It really isn’t. You know, it’s a lot different today with Amazon, UPS, FedEx and all of the things that you didn’t have,” he said.

Trump started thinking about privatizing the USPS after he heard about the agency’s annual financial losses, stating that the government should not subsidize the USPS if it can’t bring in money.

The Post reported that the USPS lost $9.5 billion in the fiscal year ending Sept. 30 and faced nearly $80 billion in liabilities, as revealed by its annual financial report.

People who will work at the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), a government-slashing panel led by Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy, also discussed making changes to the USPS.

A USPS spokesperson responded to the potential privatization of the agency by stating that it is unnecessary since the USPS was able to reduce spending on transportation by $2 billion.

“The United States Postal Service is already engaged in an initiative to ensure that we can provide our customers with a high level of service to every delivery address in the nation, at least 6 days a week in an efficient and financially sustainable fashion as required by law,” the USPS’s statement said.

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., was one of the well-known people who enthusiastically supported the idea.

“I’ve been saying for years we should sell/privatize the @USPS. American taxpayers should not be subsidizing an organization that is losing billions every single year. Trump is right. Privatizing the Post Office would be a significant way to cut waste and allow a private company to generate efficiencies the Postmaster General seems incapable of producing,” she wrote.

‘COVID All Over Again’: Newsom Faces Backlash for Declaring Health Emergency

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) California Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, was ridiculed on Wednesday after signing an emergency declaration aimed at preemptively combating potential future cases of Avian Influenza, commonly known as Bird Flu or H5N1. 

The backlash arises from Newsom’s decision to revive language reminiscent of the COVID-19 pandemic era, during which governments implemented draconian, so-called health mandates in a failed bid to stop the spread of the virus. 

Newsom announced the declaration in a press release that also admitted no single case of person-to-person transmission has been detected. 

“This proclamation is a targeted action to ensure government agencies have the resources and flexibility they need to respond quickly to this outbreak,” Newsom claimed.

“While the risk to the public remains low, we will continue to take all necessary steps to prevent the spread of this virus,” the governor added. 

The emergency declaration followed reports of Bird Flu cases detected in dairy cows on some farms in Southern California.

The virus was first identified in Texas and Kansas in March but has since spread to 16 states among dairy cattle. 

On X, Newsom received criticism from users who viewed the announcement as cynical and overly alarming. 

“We are not going this again,” the X page EndWokenes wrote, seemingly referencing the COVID-19 pandemic. 

The page Libs of TikTok added, “It’s COVID all over again.” 

One user remarked, “So he can just declare state of emergency over a single case of bird flu? Seems like an overreach…” 

Another user joked about Newsom possibly retreating to the “French Laundry,” alluding to the upscale restaurant where Newsom held a lavish gathering while enforcing lockdowns on Californians. 

Newsom had previously apologized for the 2020 scandal, stating: “I want to apologize to you because I need to preach and practice, not just preach and not practice, and I’ve done my best to do that. We’re all human. We all fall short sometimes.” 

Matt Gaetz Teases Comeback to Unveil Congress’s Secret #MeToo Settlements

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) Former Rep. Matt Gaetz has hinted at a potential return to Congress to expose secret settlements related to sexual harassment allegations.  

This plan appears to be a response to the House Ethics Committee’s surprising decision to vote in favor of releasing a report concerning Gaetz, despite his earlier departure from the House. 

On X, Gaetz stated that he is being urged to return to Congress on Jan. 3, 2025, to be sworn in for the term he won in the November 2024 election. This would enable him to file privileged motions to disclose alleged “#MeToo” settlements paid by the House of Representatives. 

“Someone suggested the following plan to me: 1. Show up 1/3/2025 to Congress 2. Participate in Speaker election (I was elected to the 119th Congress, after all…)” Gaetz wrote, garnering over 1.1 million views.

He expanded on his plan, adding: “3. Take the oath 4. File a privileged motion to expose every “me too” settlement paid using public funds (even of former members) 5. Resign and start my @OANN program at 9pm EST on January 6, 2025.” 

Gaetz’s post followed the House Ethics Committee’s decision to secretly vote to release its investigation findings related to allegations against him concerning sex trafficking claims. Notably, Gaetz has never been charged with any crimes. 

According to CNN, the Ethics Committee is set to release the report just days before the 118th Congress ends and before members of Congress leave Washington for the remainder of the year. 

The vote marks a shocking reversal from earlier assurances that the House did not have jurisdiction over Gaetz since he is no longer a member of Congress. 

Gaetz left the House on Nov. 13, 2024, the same day President-elect Donald Trump appointed him as his presumptive nominee for attorney general in the incoming administration. 

Gaetz’s prospects were thwarted after some senators, including some on the Republican side, vowed to vote against his confirmation come January 2025. 

Manhattan Man Pleads Guilty to Helping Establish Secret Chinese Police Station in NYC

(Headline USA) A Manhattan resident has pleaded guilty to helping establish a secret police station in New York City on behalf of the Chinese government.

Chen Jinping, 60, entered the guilty plea on a single count of conspiracy to act as an agent of a foreign government in Brooklyn federal court on Wednesday.

Matthew Olsen, an assistant attorney general in the U.S. Department of Justice, said Chen admitted in court to his role in “audaciously establishing an undeclared police station” in Manhattan and attempting to conceal the effort when approached by the FBI.

“This illegal police station was not opened in the interest of public safety, but to further the nefarious and repressive aims of the PRC in direct violation of American sovereignty,” he said in statement, referring to the People’s Republic of China.

Prosecutors say Chen and his co-defendant, Lu Jianwang, opened and operated a local branch of China’s Ministry of Public Security in Manhattan’s Chinatown neighborhood starting in early 2022.

The office, which occupied an entire floor of the building, performed basic services, such as helping Chinese citizens renew their Chinese driver’s licenses, but also identified pro-democracy activists living in the U.S., according to federal authorities.

The clandestine Chinese police operation was shuttered in the fall of 2022 amid an FBI investigation.

But in an apparent effort to obstruct the federal probe, Chen and Lu deleted from their phones communications with a Chinese government official they reported to, prosecutors said.

China is believed to be operating such secretive police outposts in North America, Europe and other places where there are Chinese communities.

The country, however, has denied that they are police stations, saying that they exist mainly to provide citizen services such as renewing driver’s licenses.

The arrest of Chen and Lu in April 2023 was part of a series of Justice Department prosecutions aimed at cracking down on “transnational repression,” in which foreign governments such as China work to identify, intimidate and silence dissidents in the U.S.
Lawyers for Chen and Lu declined to comment Wednesday.

Chen faces up to five years in prison at his sentencing on May 30.

Lu, who is due back in court in February, had a longstanding relationship with Chinese law enforcement officials, according to prosecutors.

Over the years, they say, the Bronx resident, who was also known as Harry Lu, helped harass and threaten a Chinese fugitive living in the U.S. and also worked to locate a pro-democracy activist in California on behalf of China’s government.

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

Stopgap Funding Bill Tanks amid Outrage over Pork Spending, Pay Raises, Data Cover-Up

(Headline USA) Republican outrage over Congress’s latest engineered fiscal crisis helped tank a controversial Congressional Resolution, while putting House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., in hot water with much of the GOP caucus.

After a day of festering on Capitol Hill, the bill met its demise when President-elect Donald Trump weighed in, abruptly rejecting the 1,547-page porkfest that Swamp politicians hoped to slip through the cracks while many had their attention turned toward the upcoming Christmas holiday.

Instead Johnson and Republicans will need to essentially renegotiate the terms, days before a deadline when federal funding runs out—or else fase a government shutdown over the break, grinding to a halt the final weeks of the lame-duck Biden administration.

Already, the massive bill was on the verge of collapse, as fiscal conservatives rejected the increased spending, egged on by billionaires Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy, who promptly rejected the plan after it was released late Tuesday night.

“Any member of the House or Senate who votes for this outrageous spending bill deserves to be voted out in 2 years,” Musk wrote on X.

Ramaswamy, who is Musk’s co-chair overseeing the new Department of Government Efficiency, offered a lengthier and more erudite reply after claiming to have read the entire bill.

“Debt-fueled spending sprees may ‘feel good’ today, but it’s like showering cocaine on an addict: it’s not compassion, it’s cruelty,” Ramaswamy said.

Nonetheless, Trump’s sudden entrance into the debate and new demands sent Congress spiraling as lawmakers were trying to wrap up work and head home for the holidays. It left Johnson scrambling to engineer a new plan before Friday’s deadline to keep government open.

“Republicans must GET SMART and TOUGH,” Trump and Vice President-elect JD Vance said in a statement.

“If Democrats threaten to shut down the government unless we give them everything they want, then CALL THEIR BLUFF,” they added. “… Anything else is a betrayal of our country.”

Democrats decried the GOP revolt over the stopgap measure, which included $100 billion in much-needed disaster aid to states hammered by Hurricanes Helene and Milton, but also included (among other things):

  • $8 billion for a new football stadium in Washington, D.C.
  • $50 million annually for an extended drinking water program
  • five years’ worth of funding for a healthcare education program
  • a massive pay raise for members of Congress
  • full federal funding to rebuild Baltimore’s Francis Scott Key Bridge
  • a reauthorization of the Pandemic and All-Hazards Preparedness Act

“House Republicans have been ordered to shut down the government and hurt the working class Americans they claim to support,” claimed House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y. “You break the bipartisan agreement, you own the consequences that follow.”

Like other Republican House speakers before him, Johnson has been unable to convince his majority to go along with the last-minute spending spree.

Democrats, who negotiated the final product with Johnson and Senate GOP leadership, will be expected to provide enough support to help Johnson ensure passage, as is often the case on big bills.

“The sooner Congress acts, the better,” said Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y.

The final package extends existing government programs and services at their current operating levels for a few more months, through March 14, 2025.

Congress has failed to pass its annual appropriations bills to fund all the various agencies in the federal government, from the Pentagon and national security apparatus, to the health, welfare, transportation and other routine domestic services. When the fiscal year ended on Sept. 30, Congress simply punted the problem by passing the temporary funding bill that expires Friday.

But the inches-thick bill goes beyond routine funding and tacks on several other measures that lawmakers were trying to push through to passage before the end of this lame-duck congressional session, especially as some elected officials will not be returning in the new year.

Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, R-Fla., called it a “s**t sandwich.”

The chairman of the Freedom Caucus, Rep. Andy Harris, R-Md., said a lot of lawmakers “are a little disappointed at how this last week has worked out.”

Although Matt Gaetz—the Florida lawmaker who forced the motion to vacate against previous House speaker Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., after a similar funding scandal—recently resigned from Congress, Johnson undoubtedly faces pressure to avoid a similar fate, with only a five-member majority going into the next congressional session.

Gaetz, fending off an underhanded vote by the House Ethics Committee to release a report outlining an investigation on his romantic affairs, jabbed at his former colleagues by asking who was guilty of the greater ethical violation.

“It’s embarrassing, though not criminal, that I probably partied, womanized, drank and smoked more than I should have earlier in life,” he wrote. “… But at least I didn’t vote for CR’s that f**k over the country!”

Garnering particular outrage was the 40% pay increase—according to some accounts—that Congress opted to give itself in order to sweeten the pot and incentivize the passage.

The bill turns off a pay freeze provision that was included in the previous short-term spending measure, which could allow a maximum pay adjustment of 3.8% or $6,600 in 2025, bringing their annual pay to $180,600 at its current level, according to a Congressional Research Service report.

Members of Congress last got a raise in 2009, when the salary was increased 2.8% to $174,000 annually. If member pay had not been frozen since 2009, salaries would be about $217,900.

The average salary in the U.S. is $63,795, according to the Social Security Administration.

Some pointed to the legislature’s record-low approval, with Congress hovering around 22% after a particularly unproductive and acrimonious few years that included House Democrats twice attempting to impeach Trump based on false, politically motivated pretenses.

“By what measure do we deserve a pay increase?” said Rep. Ralph Norman, R-S.C.

Conservative influencer Alex Muse also noted an apparent cover-up as the House stuck in a provision that sought to give itself proprietary control over all of its data, which would essentially derail the incoming Trump administration’s efforts to investigate potential criminal activity from current and former House member including now-Sen. Adam Schiff, D-Calif.; Rep. Eric Swalwell, D-Calif.; and former Rep. Liz Cheney of Wyoming.

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

Former Top Aide to New York City’s Mayor Expected in Court on Criminal Charges, AP Source Says

(Headline USA) A former top aide to New York City Mayor Eric Adams is expected in court Thursday to face corruption charges in the latest blow to an administration beset by searches, resignations and the mayor’s own indictment.

Ingrid Lewis-Martin, who resigned Sunday as Adams’s chief adviser and one of the most powerful officials in City Hall, is expected to be arraigned Thursday afternoon in state court in Manhattan, two people familiar with the matter told The Associated Press.

The people were not authorized to publicly discuss details of the case and spoke to the AP on the condition of anonymity.

The specific charges against Lewis-Martin were not publicly announced and remain unclear.

Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg and the commissioner of the city’s watchdog Department of Investigation, Jocelyn Strauber, have scheduled a news conference for Thursday afternoon. The topic was not announced.

Bragg and Strauber’s offices have been investigating Lewis-Martin. A phone message seeking comment was left with a spokesperson for the district attorney’s office. The Department of Investigation declined comment.

Lewis-Martin’s attorney, Arthur Aidala, told reporters this week that she was expected to face criminal charges related to alleged improper gifts.

Lewis-Martin said Monday that she was being “falsely accused” and that she had “not made any arrangements in advance to take any gifts or money, or to have any gifts or money given to a family member or friend in order for me to do my job.”

The charges against Lewis-Martin come as the Adams administration has been roiled by criminal investigations.

Adams, a Democrat, has himself been charged with conspiracy, wire fraud and bribery charges in an unrelated federal case scheduled for trial next April. He has pleaded not guilty.

Lewis-Martin, 63, has been one of the mayor’s closest confidants throughout his political career, serving in senior roles under Adams as he ascended the ranks of government in New York over the past nearly two decades.

Her most recent post as Adams’ chief adviser made her one of the top officials at City Hall.

She has been a target of investigators since at least September, when federal and Manhattan prosecutors met her at an airport in New York as she was getting off a flight from Japan.

At the time, federal prosecutors served her with a subpoena while Manhattan prosecutors took her phones and searched her home.

Hours after that search, Lewis-Martin appeared on a radio show hosted by Aidala to discuss the investigation, telling her attorney, “I do believe that in the end that the New York City public will see that we have not done anything illegal to the magnitude or scale that requires the federal government and the DA’s office to investigate us.”

Aidala told reporters on Monday that he believed prosecutors in Manhattan were charging Lewis-Martin to get her to cooperate against Adams.

In an unrelated news conference that day, Adams described Lewis-Martin as a “longtime friend and sister.”

Adams was charged in September with accepting luxury travel perks and illegal campaign contributions from a Turkish official and other foreign nationals looking to buy his influence.

The investigation into Adams became public late last year after federal agents searched the home of his top fundraiser, Brianna Suggs. Lewis-Martin has referred to Suggs as her goddaughter.

Since then, the Adams administration has been enveloped by a series of searches and seizures from investigators, leading to the resignations of top officials, including his police commissioner, schools chancellor, multiple deputy mayors and his director of Asian affairs.

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

Satanic Pedophile Exposed by Headline USA Pleads Guilty to Child Porn Charges

(Ken Silva, Headline USA) Knoxville man Kyle Spitze, a member of the Satanic pedophile cult 764, has agreed to plead guilty to four counts of producing child pornography.

Spitze pled guilty on Monday after striking a deal with the Justice Department last week—agreeing to plea guilty to four of the eight crimes he was originally charged for. Part of his plea agreement entails him admitting that he committed his crimes with a terroristic purpose in mind.

According to the plea agreement, last December the gaming platform sent the FBI a report on a chat group called HarmNation, which is an offshoot of the Satanic 764 cult. The FBI found Spitze to be one HarmNation’s most prolific members, the plea agreement said.

Around that same time, Spitze was going viral online for a totally different reason: He released a video of his mom’s boyfriend shooting him at point-blank range—a shot that only hit his ear.

That bizarre story, which occurred in August but only went viral in early 2024, took a deeply disturbing twist in February, when Spitze’s Satanic activities were revealed.

In early February, Spitze’s mother, Melanie Spitze, was found dead in a hotel room—as first reported on Twitter by the online researcher “Bx.”

Headline USA reached out to Spitze’s father, who confirmed the online rumors that his son was in the Satanic cult “764,” which is an offshoot of the Order of the Nine Angles, or O9A—a neo-Nazi accelerationist group involved in multiple terrorist plots.

Spitze’s father, Michael Spitze, told Headline USA that his son spiraled into Satanic cults about six years ago, when he and the now-deceased Melanie were getting separated. Spitze said his son, who was 18 at the time, was groomed by a woman named “Tara,” who was nearly 20 years his senior.

On Feb. 3 Headline USA published its expose on Spitze. Exactly one week later, the FBI executed a search warrant on his cell phone.

Spitze was arrested on Feb. 22 and indicted about a month later.

He now faces between 15 and 30 years imprisonment.

Other 764 Cases

Spitze is one of a slew of Satanic cultists arrested in recent years as the DOJ looks to crack down on a disturbing online trend, whereby Satanists and accelerationists groom teenagers to commit crimes, self-mutilation and other acts of depravity—all with the goal of accelerating the collapse of Western society.

In November 2021, the FBI arrested 764 member Angel Almeida. Details of Almeida’s 764 activities weren’t made public until records about his case were unsealed late last year.

More recently, the Justice Department filed charges in December against another 764 member, Kalana Limkin, for allegedly promoting child pornography, sexual extortion, and trafficking, animal cruelty and self-harm of minors.

And most recently, online researcher Bx revealed that Monday’s mass shooting at a Christian school was likely linked to 764 and the milieu of online Satanic chat groups.

Ken Silva is a staff writer at Headline USA. Follow him at x.com/jd_cashless.