Incumbent Kyrsten Sinema Bows Out of Hotly Contested Ariz. Senate Race

( Sen. Kyrsten Sinema, I-Ariz., will not run for re-election, shifting the dynamic in a closely watched race that pitted her against rising stars in both the Republican and Democratic parties.

“Because I choose civility, understanding, listening, working together to get stuff done, I will leave the Senate at the end of this year,” Sinema said in a video Tuesday.

The speculation that she would not seek re-election mounted in recent weeks, as she faced a narrow time frame to file petition signatures ahead of the April 1 deadline.

Her decision not to run now paves the way for a two-way race between Republican Kari Lake, a former TV news anchor who narrowly lost the 2022 gubernatorial race under suspicious circumstances, and Democrat Rep. Ruben Gallego.

The two are highly favored frontrunners for their respective parties, although both face competition in the state’s July 30 primary—including seven other challengers to Lake for the GOP nomination.

Sinema’s departure increases the odds that Lake, a darling of the MAGA movement, could reclaim one of the battleground state’s two Senate seats for Republicans after a series of disappointing election cycles flipped both in Democrats’ favor.

However, it remains unclear who will benefit most from any additional votes that the three-way race might have impacted since Sinema had incurred the wrath of many of her former Democrat supporters.

Sinema—who was elected as a Democrat but left the party in 2022, while continuing to caucus with them—has been seen as a bipartisan dealmaker and occasional maverick during her time in the Senate.

She famously joined retiring Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., to side with Republicans in shooting down an attack on the filibuster, which would have expedited the legislative process while severely undermining any checks on the majority party’s power.

Most recently she led the charge on a border security bill that ended up getting shot down by Republicans, who doubted that the bill would do anything more than subsidize the Biden administration’s existing open-border policy.

Sinema’s 2018 election followed a competitive campaign against Republican Martha McSally—an Air Force veteran who later ended up serving a brief appointed term in the Senate to replace the late John McCain. However, McSally was narrowly defeated in 2020 by Democrat Mark Kelly, a former astronaut and husband of ex-Rep. Gabby Giffords.

Headline USA’s Ben Sellers contributed to this report.

War of the ‘Whistleblowers’: Tony Bobulinski Sues Cassidy Hutchinson for Libel

(Jacob Bruns, Headline USA) Tony Bobulinski, a former Hunter Biden business partner, is suing former White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson over her allegations that he secretly conspired with the Trump administration while going public to expose the Biden family’s corruption, the New York Post reported.

Bobulinski, who recently testified in the House impeachment hearing against President Joe Biden, appeared in a notorious 2017 email chain on Hunter Biden’s abandoned laptop, in which they discussed a deal with Chinese energy firm CEFC that would include a 10% cut “for the big guy.”

In addition to vouching for the validity of the laptop email, Bobulinski confirmed what many already suspected: that the “big guy” was, in fact, Joe Biden.

His lawsuit, filed Monday in a federal court in Georgia, accused Hutchinson, who was House Democrats’ star witness in the partisan Jan. 6 committee hearings, of defamation for suggesting that he engaged in potentially illicit dealings with former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows.

Hutchinson made the claims in her memoir Enough, published last September. The self-aggrandizing yarn heralded her own decision to “bravely c[o]me forward to become the pivotal witness in the House January 6 investigations, as her testimony transfixed and stunned the nation,” while suggesting that Bobulinki did so only for greed.

“In the shadows of the bleachers, I observed Mark and Tony Bobulinski’s interaction through a gap in the vehicles,” Hutchinson wrote.

“When they said their goodbyes, I saw Mark hand Tony what appeared to be a folded sheet of paper or a small envelope,” she continued. “Mark walked toward me, staring at the ground. He was silent for several moments as we made out way back to the staff holding area.”

According to Bobulinski, though, the book is not a testimonial of Hutchinson’s bravery, but a demonstration of her “malicious conduct.”

His lawsuit said Hutchinson had “cashed in” on her time in the Trump White House, helping validate the J6 committee’s false narrative by “lying about a meeting between Mr. Bobulinski and Mark Meadows, dishonestly portraying it to be unethical and, possibly, illegal.”

Bobulinski is on the record saying that he is willing to forgo any payout if Hutchinson agrees to donate 20% of her book’s proceeds to a children’s hospital of her choice.

House Seeks Records from GoFundMe about Surveillance of ‘MAGA’

(Ken Silva, Headline USA) House Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, sent a letter Tuesday to GoFundMe CEO Tim Cadogan, seeking information on whether his company participated in the surveillance of Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol Hill protestors.

Jordan’s letter comes amidst a House Judiciary investigation into corporations and government agencies from tracking purchases made by law-abiding Jan. 6 protestors. Jordan’s Weaponization Subcommittee showed last month that the U.S. Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, or FinCEN—created to combat issues such as international money laundering—urged banks to search their databases for terms such as “MAGA” and “Trump” to find potential domestic extremists.

Jordan told Cadogan that he recently received records showing that FinCEN emailed GoFundMe and other financial institutions in the wake of Jan. 6. FinCEN alerted GoFundMe and the other financial institutions to customers’ use of Eventbrite, noting that “people have been observed using this site to post an event and sell tickets including bus tickets to the demonstrations,” Jordan said.

“Despite these transactions having no apparent nexus to criminal activity—and, in fact, relate to Americans exercising their First Amendment rights—FinCEN seems to have adopted a characterization of these Americans as potential threat actors,” Jordan told Cadogan.

“This kind of pervasive financial surveillance, carried out in coordination with federal law enforcement, without legal process, into Americans’ private transactions is alarming and raises serious concerns about the federal government’s potential abuses of Americans’ fundamental civil liberties.”

Among other information, Jordan asked for all of GoFundMe’s communications from FinCEN or any other federal agency, that may be used to identify, query, monitor, flag, target, or remove certain kinds of fundraisers or transactions. He also asked for all documents and communications between or among GoFundMe and the FBI’s Office of the Private Sector or Strategic Partner Engagement Section.

Jordan wants those documents by March 18.

Ken Silva is a staff writer at Headline USA. Follow him at twitter.com/jd_cashless.

‘Jeopardy!’ Question on Neopronouns Engenders Calls for Boycott

(Jacob Bruns, Headline USA) Conservative Jeopardy! fans were up in arms after an episode last week capitulated to woke gender ideology with a question about “neopronouns,” the New York Post reported.

Some may now be considering a boycott of the NBC’s long-running primetime staple, which pointedly eschewed controversy during the decadeslong reign of late host Alex Trebek. Trebek died of pancreatic cancer in November 2020, sending the trivia-based game show into an identity crisis as it scrambled for a suitable replacement.

With Wheel of Fortune‘s outspoken conservative host Pat Sajak having announced last June that the current season would be his last, one of the few remaining bastions against wokeism on network TV may soon be coming to a close for good.

The sensitive topic came up during the first round on the show’s “Tournament of Champions” quarterfinal, which aired on Monday, Feb. 26.

Contestant Cris Pannullo took a clue for $600 from the category “Speech! Parts of Speech!”

The clue read, “Xem, Xyrs, Xemself,” prompting Pannullo to respond with the question, “What are pronouns?”

Ken Jennings, the host, allowed the answer. “Those are pronouns,” he said, before clarifying for elderly viewers who might be baffled by the response: “Neopronouns.”

So-called neopronouns are a recent grammatical innovation, serving the activist agenda of the LGBT+ crowd as it seeks to weaponize language and semantics in order to impose radical, anti-scientific diktats on an unwitting public.

According to CNN, neopronouns are “gender-neutral or nonbinary pronouns that are distinct from the common she, he and they.”

In an attempt to rewrite history, CNN also claimed that the use of words like “xe” and “em” “date back several centuries, when they were introduced by writers as a solution for referring to subjects without assuming gender.”

According to the definition proffered by a leading LGBT activist group, the Human Rights Campaign, the use of neopronouns in daily speech is a “step towards a society where people can more fully express all parts of themselves.”

Naturally, many Jeopardy! fans on Twitter ripped the show for going woke.

“I still watch Jeopardy every day but their questions and answers keep getting weirder and weirder,” wrote one irritated Twitter user, @Dennydagoat. “When Alex Trebek was still alive we never had any of this.”

Twitter and Tesla CEO Elon Musk also shared his thoughts about Jeopardy’s wokeness in a Monday tweet.

According to Musk, it is imperative to end the gender madness if American is to survive:

While the old adage “go woke, go broke” has not always turned out to be true, it seems plausible that Jeopardy! could face a situation similar to Bud Light, which caused a debacle for itself last summer when the beer brand tried to use transgender spokesperson Dylan Mulvaney to rebrand the product.

Surprisingly, according to a 2022 survey, the Trebek-less neo-Jeopardy! performs better among 18- to 34-year-olds than with older age demographics.

Among the 4,199 survey respondents 44% of those in the younger age group watched compared with 30% of those 35 to 64 and 36% of those 65 and up.

In another question with 3,216 responses, 40% of Jeopardy! viewers said they used cannabis at least on occasion, while only 26% of non-viewers admitted to doing so.

Viewers also were 8% more likely to have used or planned to use TikTok.

Headline USA’s Ben Sellers contributed to this report.

Report Details Failures w/ Post Office’s $65M Surveillance Apparatus

(Ken Silva, Headline USA) The U.S. Postal Inspection Service is attempting to become a quasi-NSA—monitoring Black Lives Matters protestors, J6ers and other political activists—but can’t even track the equipment it uses to engage in that surveillance, according to a recent report from the Postal Service’s inspector general.

The Feb. 13 IG report revealed that the USPIS about 10,000 pieces of law enforcement surveillance equipment valued at over $65 million. Surveillance equipment includes devices that capture communications, visual images, and physical locations, the report said.

When it audited that equipment, the IG found “134 of 404 (33 percent) pieces of electronic surveillance equipment and 464 of 1,238 (37 percent) pieces of technical surveillance equipment that…were either recorded with errors or were not recorded in the inventory management system.”

The IG report serves as a reminder that the USPIS’s controversial social media monitoring program—now known as the “Analytics Team”—is still in operation.  The program was known as the Internet Covert Operations Program, or iCOP, when it was revealed by Yahoo News in 2021.

Rep. Matt Gaetz, R-Fla., introduced legislation last August that would abolish the Analytics Team. Gaetz’s legislation would prohibit any federal funds, including amounts available in the Postal Service Fund, from being used by USPIS to carry out iCOP, or any other similar program.

“The Postal Service should be focused on delivering the mail on time and on budget, not running a covert surveillance program to monitor political behavior on social media,” Gaetz said in a press release.

“This program is not only outside USPIS’ jurisdiction and infringes on American citizens’ civil liberties but is more evidence of the government-sanctioned spying on its own citizens. Congress must immediately abolish this program.”

In March 2022, the USPS Inspector General released a report stating that “certain proactive searches iCOP conducted using an open-source intelligence tool from February to April 2021 exceed the Postal Inspection Service’s law enforcement authority.”

Postal Police Officers Association President Frank Albergo has also criticized the USPIS for devoting resources to iCOP while cutting back on postal police officer amidst spiking mail theft.

In 2022, 412 USPS letter carriers were robbed on the job, according to a Postal Service press release from earlier this month. Additionally, the agency reported an increase in high volume mail theft incidents from mail receptacles: 38,500 2022 and more than 25,000 in the first half of fiscal year 2023.

“According to the Inspection Service, it has the power to conduct surveillance on every piece of mail but does not have the power to deploy uniformed postal police officers to protect the mail and postal workers,” Albergo told Headline USA in May.

“Can you imagine a law enforcement agency that doesn’t want their uniformed law enforcement officers to enforce the law? Actually, in this day and age, you probably can imagine it.”

Ken Silva is a staff writer at Headline USA. Follow him at twitter.com/jd_cashless.

Wall Street Firms, Woke Corporations Abandon DEI amid Lawsuit Panic

(Molly Bruns, Headline USA) Facing mounting concerns over the threat of lawsuits, several major financial firms on Wall Street, as well as other top companies, have started rolling back their diversity, equity and inclusion practices—welcoming white, male employees and others who had previously been excluded, according to Bloomberg.

Reports indicated that Goldman Sachs Group Inc., Bank of America Corp., Bank of New York Mellon Corp. and several other institutions were encouraged by lawyers to drop discriminatory programs that offered preferential treatment to certain minorities.

Those programs and practices could potentially violate the Supreme Court’s ruling last June against affirmative action, or else invite test cases that would serve as corporate corollaries to the landmark reversal impacting educational institutions.

“We’re at an interesting inflection point,” said Ana Duarte McCarthy, former chief diversity officer at Citigroup, discussing the onslaught of woke social-justice initiatives that previously infected corporate culture.

“We’re not suggesting that things stop because there’s this fear factor,” she added. “But rather, take a look.”

The leftward shift was largely the byproduct of the controversial ESG movement, which saw major investment firms punishing companies that fell out of step with their progressive political agendas.

The wave hit its crescendo in 2020, as efforts to undermine the Trump administration cross-pollinated with outrage—some of it organic, some manufactured—following the fentanyl overdose of George Floyd while in police custody, and the months of urban race riots that ensued in its aftermath.

Many companies have been reluctant to abandon DEI practices altogether—publicly, at least. Privately, however, they have been making minor, almost imperceptible, tweaks to avoid legal and financial consequences from the turning tide of public sentiment.

“Are they doing it publicly? Vocally? Of course not,” said Subha Barry, former head of diversity at Merrill Lynch. “But they’re doing it. And when they do it, you have to listen.”

Annual filings in American finance revealed extensive changes to their diversity goals all around.

Lawyers advised executives at Goldman Sachs to remove any reference of race and gender in college recruitment programs, as well as events for specific identity groups.

JPMorgan previously hosted a summer fellowship program for black undergraduates, which they have since opened to all students “regardless of background.”

Companies also altered their internal goals and metrics.

Citizens Financial Group Inc. did away with their goal of having at least 50% of the candidates in mid- or senior-level roles be women or people of color.

While some recruitment programs are still aimed at women and people of color, and company executives still claim to be dedicated to the DEI cause, corporate America’s apparent “racial reckoning,” has come to a screeching halt.

“We’re past the peak,” Barry acknowledged.

The new shift in corporate strategy appears, in part, to be a response to conservative backlash to diversity standards and growing animosity among white employees, possibly leading to “reverse discrimination” lawsuits.

Former Trump adviser Stephen Miller’s America First Legal and Edward Blum’s American Alliance for Equal Rights have both been at the forefront of such efforts.

Blum, who was the lead lawyer in the pair of Supreme Court cases that reversed affirmative action, recently sued the Fearless Fund, a group that invests in companies owned and operated by women of color, saying that the group’s grants discriminated on the basis of race.

Meanwhile, billionaires such as Elon Musk and hedge-fund investor Bill Ackman have initiated a sort of reverse ESG by threatening to withdraw support from woke corporations—particularly those whose advancement of DEI-rooted, intersectional political objectives promote the censorship and discrimination of others.

The Musk-owned Tesla recently removed language about minority workers from a regulatory filing, and Ackman helped pressure Harvard University to backtrack on its anti-Semitism following Hamas’s Oct. 7 terrorist attack on Israel.

Headline USA’s Ben Sellers contributed to this report.

Biden Threat to Seize Russian Assets Sends Gold to All-Time Highs

(Mike Maharrey, Money Metals News Service) The United States enjoys the privilege of issuing the world’s reserve currency. But it increasingly uses that privilege as a hammer to shape foreign policy.

Could Americans end up feeling the blows from that hammer?

Economist Jim Rickards, the author of Currency Wars, said he thinks that’s already happening.

After gold futures closed at a record high last Friday, the intraday spot price of gold surged over $2,100 per ounce on Monday, knocking on the door of its all-time high of $2,135 set last December.

What is driving this big rally in gold?

There are many factors. Recent inflation and economic data revived hope that the Federal Reserve would cut interest rates sooner rather than later. But is likely a more fundamental factor driving gold strength as well – de-dollarization.

Jim Rickards explained it this way in a tweet:

Last month, Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen turned heads by brazenly calling for liquidating frozen Russian assets totaling around $300 billion and using the proceeds to help rebuild war-torn Ukraine.

“It is necessary and urgent for our coalition to find a way to unlock the value of these immobilized assets to support Ukraine’s continued resistance and long-term reconstruction,” Yellen said.

“I believe there is a strong international law, economic, and moral case for moving forward,” she added. “This would be a decisive response to Russia’s unprecedented threat to global stability.”

Meanwhile, legislation is working its way through Congress titled the Rebuilding Economic Prosperity and Opportunity (REPO) for Ukrainians Act. The bill would authorize the U.S. to seize assets held by the Central Bank of Russia.

It remains unclear how many Treasury bonds and notes the Russian central bank holds.

Last November, the Russian bank released a statement claiming, “The Bank of Russia does not have U.S. treasury bonds; we do not buy these securities.” But the Treasury Department released data in September showing the Bank of Russia owns $73 million in U.S. Treasuries. Russian residents reportedly hold around $33 million in Treasury Securities.

The amount is relatively small because — recognizing the risk of U.S. sanctions and seizures — the Russians divested themselves of most of its dollar-denominated assets in 2018. The Russian bank sold roughly 85 percent of its Treasury holdings. At the same time, it aggressively bought gold.

Regardless of how many Treasuries the Russians still hold, repossessing them would set a major precedent, and as Rickards pointed out, the rest of the world is watching… and acting.

The Dollar as a Foreign Policy Hammer

Sen. Jim Risch, R-Idaho, called the Repo Act “a big hammer.”

“This is intended to be a big hammer. It’s intended to be a very new way of attacking a country that does not behave itself.”

Using U.S. bonds as a foreign policy billy club could certainly incentivize other countries to “behave,” but as Rickards warned, it is already sending another message – get out of Treasuries now while you can.

He warned about this kind of move during a Fox & Friends Weekend interview in April 2023, saying the biggest risk to the dollar isn’t other countries moving away from using the greenback as payment. Rickards pointed out that the biggest threat to the dollar is the U.S. Treasury itself.

“The U.S. Treasury has weaponized the dollar, frozen the reserves of the Central Bank of Russia and other countries looking around saying, ‘Hey, what if they don’t like what I did? What if they don’t like one of my policies, are [they] going to freeze my reserves?’”

And if you are holding something that could be used against you, what would you do?

You’d get rid of it to minimize the risk. After all, something you don’t have can’t be used against you.

Of course, you would need to replace dollars and dollar-denominated assets. As Rickards tweeted, if U.S. bonds aren’t safe, other countries’ bonds probably aren’t either. That leaves one logical place to turn, according to Rickards.

“If you say, ‘I want to get out of the dollar as a reserve currency,’ the only really good alternative is gold.”

Over the last several years, central banks have been gobbling up gold. Central bank net gold purchases totaled 1,037 tons in 2023. That fell just 45 tons short of 2022’s multi-decade record, continuing a multi-year trend of strong central bank gold buying.

The World Gold Council cited “diversification” as one of the key reasons central banks are stocking up on gold. That’s a technical way of saying, “Rely less on dollars.”

Poland’s central bank president Adam Glapiński said “security” was one reason his country was increasing its gold reserves.

“Gold will retain its value even when someone cuts off the power to the global financial system, destroying traditional assets based on electronic accounting records. Of course, we do not assume that this will happen. But as the saying goes – forewarned is always insured.”

Is it a coincidence we saw a big spike in gold at the same time U.S. policymakers are again rattling sabers and threatening to repossess Russian assets? It could be. But as Rickards points out, it’s probably not.

De-dollarization might not be the primary factor driving more people to buy gold today, but it is almost certainly one factor. And if the U.S. keeps swinging that hammer, it will become a bigger and bigger factor down the road.

U.S. officials would be wise to take notice. They might end up hitting themselves with those hammer swings. 


Mike Maharrey is a journalist and market analyst for MoneyMetals.com with over a decade of experience in precious metals. He holds a BS in accounting from the University of Kentucky and a BA in journalism from the University of South Florida.

Ukraine War Architect Victoria Nuland to Retire This Month

(Headline USA) Victoria Nuland, the third-highest ranking U.S. diplomat and frequent target of criticism for her hawkish views on Russia and its actions in Ukraine, will leave her post this month, the State Department said Tuesday.

Nuland, a career foreign service officer who served as assistant secretary of State for Europe during the Obama administration but retired after Donald Trump was elected president, returned to government as undersecretary of State for political affairs in the Biden administration.

In both the Obama and Biden administrations, she played a significant role in America’s nationbuilding efforts in Ukraine, beginning with the 2014 color revolution that ousted its Russia-friendly leader and installed one more friendly and pliant to the Obama government.

Joe Biden himself was caught in a candid 2016 correspondence with then-Ukraine President Petro Poroshenko discussing efforts to conceal America’s operations in Ukraine from the incoming Trump administration.

“This is getting very, very close to what I don’t want to have happen,” Biden said in a recorded message. “I don’t want Trump to get in the position where he thinks he’s about to buy on to a policy where the financial system is going to collapse and he’s going to be looked to to pour more money into Ukraine.”

He later told Poroshenko, “No, no, they are not [working with Trump],” after the latter expressed concerns about the possibility that the FBI might get involved.

Meanwhile, seditious partisans embedded in the National Security Council, who were working in tandem with Democrats, set up Trump for an impeachment scandal after he called on newly elected Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to reopen an investigation.

Biden’s own government has since pourd hundreds of millions of dollars into the country under the administration, while the New York Times recently acknowledged at least 12 secret CIA bases were operating in the country.

Nuland herself admitted in congressional testimony shortly after Russia’s February 2022 invasion that the U.S. maintained laboratories in Ukraine that were likely conducting reserach into biological warfare.

“Ukraine has biological research facilities which we are now quite concerned Russian forces may be seeking to gain control of,” she said in response to a question from Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., at a hearing of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.

While the specific reasons for Nuland’s latest retirement were not immediately known, it may be an indication that America’s meddling in Ukraine is about to come to light in a more serious way, where those left holding the bag will face accountability.

Greater concern over Biden’s declining faculties and general electability suggest that Democrats may seek to oust the president—perhaps through leaks about the true nature of the Ukraine operations.

Meanwhile, waning public support—particularly among fiscal conservatives—has left the prospect of future funding for Ukraine uncertain, which may compel Zelenskyy to speak out as he faces the prospect of losing his own grip on power.

Either way, there are clear signs that Ukraine—once the cause célèbre of leftists, globalists and neocons everywhere—may be taking a back seat to China where, despite Biden’s close business relationships with the trans-Pacific superpower, there are growing concerns about President Xi Jinping’s efforts to undermine U.S. geopolitical interests, including Taiwan’s sovereignty.

Nuland had been a candidate to succeed Wendy Sherman as deputy Secretary of State and had served as acting deputy since Sherman’s retirement seven months ago but lost an internal administration personnel battle when President Joe Biden nominated Kurt Campbell—somtimes considered to be Biden’s “Asia czar”—to the no. 2 spot. Campbell took office last month.

Nuland had served at the U.S. embassy in Moscow in the tumultuous 1990s and was in the city during the attempted coup against former Russian President Boris Yeltsin.

She then became U.S. ambassador to NATO before being tapped to serve as the State Department spokeswoman under former Secretary Hillary Rodham Clinton during President Barack Obama’s first term.

As the department spokeswoman and later as assistant Secretary of State for Europe, Nuland drew the ire of many Russian leaders for her outspoken defense of Ukraine, particularly after Russia annexed the Crimean peninsula in 2014.

Former Secretary of State John Kerry has recalled on numerous times that when Nuland left the spokeswoman’s job during his tenure to become the top diplomat for Europe, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov congratulated him for “getting rid of that woman.”

Kerry said he replied to Lavrov that he didn’t get rid of her, “I promoted her.”

Current Secretary of State Antony Blinken praised Nuland for her three and a half decades of public service and thanked her for her role in shaping U.S. policy around the world under six presidents and 10 secretaries of state.

“But it’s Toria’s leadership on Ukraine that diplomats and students of foreign policy will study for years to come,” Blinken said in a statement.

“Her efforts have been indispensable to confronting Putin’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, marshaling a global coalition to ensure his strategic failure, and helping Ukraine work toward the day when it will be able to stand strongly on its own feet—democratically, economically, and militarily,” Blinken added.

Nuland will be replaced temporarily as undersecretary by another career diplomat, John Bass, a former ambassador to Afghanistan who oversaw the catastrophic U.S. withdrawal from the country. He is currently the undersecretary of state for management.

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

Report: Haitian Prison Break Was Part of CIA-Sponsored Coup

(Ken Silva, Headline USA) As Haiti continues to deal with an estimated 4,000 prison inmates who recently escaped two of the island’s largest prisons, a new report in The Grayzone reveals that the CIA helped engineer a jailbreak more than 20 years ago as part of a coup against the Caribbean country’s former government.

According to The Grayzone, the CIA was responsible for a 2002 jailbreak in which a bulldozer smashed through local prison walls, allowing armed supporters of Amiot Métayer, a gang leader imprisoned weeks earlier for harassing Haitian political figures, to overrun the facility. The breakout set in motion a violent regime change campaign, which ultimately ousted popular anti-imperial President Jean-Bertrand Aristide from office on February 29, 2004.

The Grayzone reported Friday that the CIA was responsible for that series of events.

Citing CIA documents obtained through a records request, the publication reported that a veteran CIA operative had been in a meeting with disloyal local police officers and coup plotters in Gonaïves the night prior to the 2002 jailbreak. According to the CIA records, Haiti’s then-President Aristide accused the CIA officer, Janice Elmore, as being responsible for the jailbreak and ensuing instability in his country.

“Evidently, Elmore was well acquainted with ‘questionable individuals’ in Haiti who had an interest in Aristide’s downfall, and were later implicated in the February 2004 coup,” The Grayzone reported.

“That she met with them and their allies the night before the Gonaïves jailbreak is close to smoking gun proof of US foreknowledge of that act, and a strong indication the foundations of Aristide’s forced expulsion were being consciously laid well in advance.”

The Grayzone also quoted an anonymous former U.S/ embassy staffer in Port-au-Prince, who described Elmore as stridently “anti-Aristide,” and married to a member of a U.S. special operations force.

Even more interestingly, the outlet documented Elmore’s ties to the Iran-Contra scandal—specifically, to the alleged cocaine smuggling operation carried out by Nicuraguan rebels in the 1980s with the CIA’s blessing.

A DEA whistleblower reportedly told the Justice Department’s Inspector General in 1997 that he reported directly to Elmore in El Salvador during the Iran-Contra scandal. The whistleblower reportedly described Elmore as a CIA officer operating undercover as a State Department embassy political officer.

“Elmore was subsequently interviewed behind closed doors by the House Intelligence Committee about her knowledge of CIA drug trafficking,” The Grayzone said.

“Her testimony has never been released. At the time, former LAPD narcotics investigator Michael C. Ruppert charged that while in El Salvador, she ‘routinely met’ with ‘military and political leaders’ and ‘used sexual liaisons to gather intelligence and protect drug operations.’

Neither Elmore nor the CIA commented for the publication’s article.

Ken Silva is a staff writer at Headline USA. Follow him at twitter.com/jd_cashless.

CNN’s Jake Tapper Presses Haley over Trump ‘Erection’

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) CNN anchor Jake Tapper appeared to have fantasized about GOP presidential front-runner Donald Trump’s “erection” during a Monday interview with former U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley. 

While discussing the overturning of the Colorado Supreme Court’s decision to bar Donald Trump from appearing on the state’s primary ballot, Tapper mistakenly referred to Trump’s “erection” instead of “insurrection” on Jan. 6. 

“[The Colorado Supreme Court] said that [Trump] participated in an erection,” Tapper said before noticing the error. “And I have to an insurrection—sorry insurrection. I have to say I got up at five this morning to do Kasie Hunt show and I’m exhausted.”

The video, which shows Haley laughing at Tapper, garnered attention on social media, with some questioning whether the seemingly innocent verbal slip was intentional. 

Notably, Tapper joined a growing list of individuals confusing the words “erection” with “insurrection,” including CNN correspondent John Berman, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, embattled Rep. Adam Schiff, and most recently, leftist Rep. Pramila Jayapal.

During a House Judiciary Committee hearing on Jan. 10, 2024, Jayapal prompted lawmakers to laugh out loud after her gaffe.

“I think we’re all outraged about many things, but if we’re gonna talk about outrageous things that have happened or things that have never happened, let’s talk about the fact that President Trump incited an erection,” she said, triggering the room to break into laughter.

Schumer, addressing the Senate floor on Jan. 22, 221, similarly slipped the same gaffe: “Make no mistake, there will be a trial and when that trial ends, senators will have to decide if they believe Donald John Trump incited the erection – insurrection – against the United States.” 

Not to be outdone by Schumer and Jayapal, Schiff on Nov. 9, 2021 told The View’s hosts: “But let’s not use that as a smokescreen to somehow shield Donald Trump’s culpability for inviting Russia to help him in the election, which they did, for trying to coerce Ukraine into helping him in the next election, which he did, into inciting an erection…” 

Tapper’s colleague Berman was the first to bring up the “erection” gaffe on CNN during an interview with Sen. Tina Smith, D-Minn., on Feb. 1, 2021.

“So you are going to sit in and listen to the Senate impeachment trial of the former president of the United States, who has been impeached for inciting the erection,” he claimed, before noticing the slip. “Er, inciting the insurrection at the US Capitol.”