Friday, May 23, 2025

House Oversight Demands Answers about ‘Cover Up’ of Biden’s Health Decline

(The Center Square) U.S. House Oversight Committee Chair Rep. James Comer, R-Ky., ratcheted up an investigation Thursday into the alleged cover up of President Joe Biden’s ongoing mental decline.

The media, president Biden and family and staff close to him as well as the president’s doctor have taken fire from those who say they colluded to cover up Biden’s mental decline, which eventually became impossible to ignore during a fateful debate last summer against now President Donald Trump.

Questions about the president’s mental decline were brushed aside by the mainstream media and top Democrats up until that point. They often insisted the president was “sharp” and on top of his game.

Comer pointed to a line from “Original Sin,” a new book by CNN’s Jake Tapper and Axios’ Alex Thompson, that says “five people were running the country, and Joe Biden was at best a senior member of the board.”

Another component of the story is Biden’s potential use of an autopen to sign documents instead of signing them by hand, though the use of autopen and to what degree it was used has not been confirmed.

“The cover-up of President Biden’s obvious mental decline is a historic scandal,” Comer said in the letters. “The American people deserve to know when this decline began, how far it progressed, and who was making critical decisions on his behalf. Key executive actions signed by autopen, such as sweeping pardons for the Biden Crime Family, must be examined considering President Biden’s diminished capacity.”

Now, Biden has announced a cancer diagnosis, raising questions about how long the president and his team knew about the cancer before announcing it.

Trump said this week he was “surprised the public wasn’t notified a long time ago” given how far Biden’s cancer has progressed.

Comer called for transcribed interviews with President Biden’s Physician Dr. Kevin O’Connor; former Director of the Domestic Policy Council Neera Tanden; former Assistant to the President and Senior Advisor to the First Lady Anthony Bernal; former Assistant to the President and Deputy Chief of Staff Annie Tomasini; and former Special Assistant to the President and Deputy Director of Oval Office Operations Ashley Williams.

“In the last Congress, the Biden White House blocked these individuals from providing testimony to the Oversight Committee as part of the effort to cover-up Biden’s declining health,” Comer said. “Any continued obstruction will be met with swift and decisive action. The American people demand transparency and accountability now.”

Candace Owens Claims Harvey Weinstein is Innocent, Sparking Conservative Backlash

(José Niño, Headline USA) As Hollywood mogul Harvey Weinstein faces a pivotal retrial, Candace Owens’ decision to broadcast his claims of innocence has reignited fierce debate over #MeToo.

On Tuesday, as testimony continued in Weinstein’s rape retrial, Owens aired a lengthy interview with the former producer, who is currently serving a 16-year sentence for a separate conviction in Los Angeles. 

In the interview, Weinstein maintained his innocence, insisting, “I did not commit these crimes,” while admitting to personal mistakes and infidelities, according to a report by Hollywood Reporter. He denied having any physical contact with actress Gwyneth Paltrow, though he conceded to making a “pass” at her.

The timing of the interview is highly unusual. It is rare for a defendant to speak publicly during an active trial, and according to sources, Weinstein’s own legal team was not informed about the project until after it was completed. 

On Tuesday, during a 21-minute on-camera interview with Weinstein, Owens declared that Weinstein may have been “immoral” when it came to how he cheated on his wife. However, Owens insisted that Weinstein was still “wrongfully convicted” and was targeted as a scapegoat for the #MeToo movement.

For some time, Owens has publicly questioned the validity of his convictions, characterizing the original New York trial as a “witch hunt” and expressing satisfaction when the conviction was overturned by a state appeals court in 2024.

According to women’s advocacy group Equality Now, New York’s Court of Appeals found that the trial judge had erred by allowing testimony from women whose allegations were not part of the formal charges, a legal technicality that narrowed the focus of the current retrial

Owens has repeatedly stated that while Weinstein may be “immoral,” he was “wrongfully convicted” and targeted as a scapegoat for the #MeToo movement. She is now promoting a series of interviews called “Harvey Speaks,” which she claims will reveal the truth behind the allegations and exonerate Weinstein.

Owens’ move to platform Weinstein has provoked a major backlash among certain elements of the American Right who view this decision with suspicion.

American nationalist Nick Fuentes had choice words for Owens’ decision to interview Weinstein. In an X post, Fuentes said, “Candace Owens is currently trying to rehabilitate a convicted Jewish Hollywood sex criminal. Yet she refuses to defend or even talk to me.”

Fuentes added, “Apparently I’m more toxic than Harvey Weinstein and Kevin Spacey. I guess it’s still worse to be accused of being an antisemite than a pedophile or a rapist.”

The following day, Fuentes published another post expressing his frustration with right-wing influencers trying to rehabilitate Weinstein’s image. He noted that if Weinstein were a free man, he’d be pushing ethnic cleansing in Gaza, war with Iran, censorship against conservatives and other policies that work against right-wingers’ interests.

The retrial may determine Weinstein’s legal fate, but the public debate sparked by Owens’ interview suggests his broader cultural verdict is far from settled.

José Niño is the deputy editor of Headline USA. Follow him at x.com/JoseAlNino 

Come On Moody’s, Tell Us Something We Didn’t Know!

(Mike Maharrey, Money Metals News Service) The most surprising thing about Moody’s downgrade of the U.S. government’s credit rating was that so many people seemed surprised. The reaction should have been, “Tell us something we didn’t already know!”

Last Friday, Moody’s cut Uncle Sam’s credit rating by one notch, from AAA to AA1.

“Successive U.S. administrations and Congress have failed to agree on measures to reverse the trend of large annual fiscal deficits and growing interest costs.”

How could anybody not see this coming?

In late March, Moody’s released a pessimistic report on America’s creditworthiness.

“The US’s fiscal strength is on course for a continued multiyear decline, driven by widening federal budget deficits, a rising debt burden and falling debt affordability.”

Way back in November 2023, Moody’s lowered its outlook on the U.S. government credit from “stable” to “negative.” This is often a prelude to a downgrade in the country’s AAA credit rating.

And here we are.

Moody’s is the last of the major credit rating agencies to keep U.S. debt at a AAA rating. Standard & Poor’s (S&P) cut the U.S. sovereign rating a notch from AAA to AA+ in 2011. Fitch followed suit last year, citing “the expected fiscal deterioration over the next three years.”

We’ve known for years that the federal government is in a downward fiscal spiral.

The national debt surged over $36 trillion last fall, and despite some headlines generated by DOGE, there is no sign that the spending is going to slow down.

In fact, spending is up.

The Trump administration blew through $591.77 billion in April. That was 4.4 percent higher than April 2024’s spending. At $4.16 trillion, spending is up 8.9 percent through the first seven months of fiscal 2025.

And the proposed federal budget for next year would add trillions to these already massive deficits.

Stocks fell on the “surprise” move by Moody’s, and bonds also sold off. The 10-year Treasury yield surged to nearly 4.6 percent, and the 30-year hit levels not seen in nearly 18 years.

Again, this isn’t surprising. Moody’s reminds the world that the U.S. is mired in a fiscal mess with no political will to fix it. Why would you lend even more money to your irresponsible, drunk uncle?

The slide in demand for Treasuries exacerbates a growing problem for the federal government. As yields rise, it becomes more and more expensive for the federal government to finance its borrowing and spending problem.

Interest on the national debt cost $101.7 billion in April. That brought the total interest expense for the fiscal year to $684.1 billionup 9.5 percent over the same period in 2024.

So far, in fiscal 2025, the federal government has spent more on interest on the debt than it has on national defense ($536 billion) or Medicare ($550 billion). The only higher spending category is Social Security ($907 billion).

Uncle Sam paid $1.13 trillion in interest expenses in fiscal 2023. It was the first time interest expense had ever eclipsed $1 trillion. Projections are for interest expense to break that record in fiscal 2025.

Some people think the Federal Reserve can intervene with rate cuts and mitigate Uncle Sam’s interest problem. But the fact is, the Fed has little control over the long end of the yield curve. This was apparent when Treasury yields spiked even after the Fed cut rates last year.

The only thing the Fed can do is run quantitative easing (QE). In QE operations, the central bank buys U.S. Treasuries on the open market, creating additional demand. This typically drives yields lower. However, there is a downside. When running QE programs, the Fed buys bonds with money created out of thin air. This is, by definition, inflation.

In a post on X, Bridgewater Associates founder and billionaire Ray Dalio alluded to this, saying the U.S. debt problem is even bigger than the Moody’s downgrade suggests because credit rating agencies only factor in the likelihood a country won’t pay its debts.

“They don’t include the greater risk that the countries in debt will print money to pay their debts, thus causing holders of the bonds to suffer losses from the decreased value of the money they’re getting (rather than from the decreased quantity of money they’re getting).”

The Moody’s downgrade didn’t tell us anything we didn’t already know. It merely put the issue back in the headlines. However, within weeks, the credit rating will be ancient history, and the federal government will continue borrowing and spending. The fact that Congress is pushing through a tax cut bill that will grow the deficits and wants to raise the debt ceiling by some $5 trillion tells you everything you need to know about Congress’s commitment to addressing the debt issue.

This is nothing but a game of kick the can. Moody’s just reminded us that the road is getting shorter.


Mike Maharrey is a journalist and market analyst for Money Metals with over a decade of experience in precious metals. He holds a BS in accounting from the University of Kentucky and a BA in journalism from the University of South Florida.

Senate Report: Health Agencies Hid COVID Jab’s Risk of Myocarditis

(José Niño, Headline USA) A new Senate report alleges federal health agencies delayed warning the public about myocarditis risks linked to mRNA COVID-19 vaccines.

On Wednesday, Sen. Ron Johnson, R-WI, chairman of the Senate’s Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, released a major interim staff report and convened a high-profile hearing to examine how federal health agencies handled early warnings about myocarditis—a rare heart inflammation—after people started receiving mRNA COVID-19 jabs.  

The investigation claimed that U.S. health officials delayed and downplayed public warnings about this potential side effect, particularly among young adults, during the early months of the vaccine rollout.

Myocarditis is an inflammation of the heart muscle, which can cause chest pain, shortness of breath, and, in rare cases, serious complications. COVID-19 vaccinations have been implicated in the occurrence of myocarditis. 

The newly released PSI report, spanning over 2,400 pages of records, alleges that federal officials were alerted as early as February 2021 to the risk of myocarditis after mRNA vaccination. Israeli health authorities first notified their U.S. counterparts about dozens of myocarditis cases in young people following vaccination, per a report by Voz. 

Over the next several months, U.S. vaccine safety monitoring systems, including the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), began detecting similar signals.

According to Johnson’s report, by mid-May 2021, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) officials were drafting a formal notification to alert healthcare providers about the myocarditis risk. 

However, internal communications reveal that senior officials at the Food and Drug Administration, including CDC official Sara Oliver, expressed concerns about issuing a prominent warning, fearing it could appear “alarmist” and potentially undermine vaccination efforts. 

Instead of a formal Health Alert Network (HAN) notification, the CDC opted for a less prominent website posting.

The report contends that this decision delayed broad awareness among healthcare providers and the public, even as VAERS reports of myocarditis continued to rise. It wasn’t until late June 2021 that the FDA updated vaccine labels to include myocarditis warnings.

José Niño is the deputy editor of Headline USA. Follow him at x.com/JoseAlNino

Secret Service Agents Get into Cat Fight outside Obama’s Home

(Luis CornelioHeadline USATwo female Secret Service agents reportedly came to blows at Barack Obama’s D.C. crib while they were supposed to protect the former president’s residence early Wednesday. 

At around 2:30 a.m., one agent summoned a superior before threatening a fellow agent in a now-viral audio clip released by RealClearPolitics reporter Susan Crabtree. 

“Can I get a supervisor down to Delta 2 immediately before I whoop this girl’s ass,” the agent demanded.

According to RealClearPolitics, the agent was upset that her shift relief arrived late. After that, she assailed her colleague “verbally and physically when she finally did arrive to relieve her.” 

The audio is reportedly being shared among agents and officers. 

“It’s unclear whether either woman was injured or whether they will be disciplined over the altercation,” Crabtree reported. “The fight did not wake anyone in the Obama residence or the surrounding neighborhood.” 

The alleged incident comes amid growing scrutiny of the Secret Service’s recent fixation on diversity, equity and inclusion policies under former Director Kimberly Cheatle.  

Cheatle, appointed by then-President Joe Biden in 2022, faced criticism from several lawmakers who questioned the readiness of new agents during the assassination attempt on President Donald Trump in the summer of 2024. 

The backlash prompted Cheatle to resign in disgrace in July, though the Secret Service stood by their agents in public statements. 

“As an elite law enforcement agency, all of our agents and officers are highly trained and fully capable of performing our missions,” Secret Service spokesperson Anthony Guglielmi told the media in 2024. 

“It is an insult to the women of our agency to imply that they are unqualified based on gender. Such baseless assertions undermine the professionalism, dedication and expertise of our workforce,” he added. 

DEI at the Secret Service was pushed heavily during the Obama era. According to the book Zero Fail, the agency through out hundreds of qualified applicants in favor of DEI candidates, some of whom didn’t even know what the Secret Service does.

“Applicants showed up in gym shorts. Some said they couldn’t agree to a required home interview because their roommates didn’t like having cops around,” Washington Post reporter Carol Leonnig wrote in that book. “These interviews sucked up supervisors’ valuable time, with almost no results.”

 

‘Hawk Tuah’ 2.0: Woman Arrested after Spitting on DOJ Official

(Luis CornelioHeadline USA) The DOJ has arrested the woman captured on video allegedly spitting on Associate Attorney General Ed Martin while he was serving as interim U.S. attorney for D.C. 

Emily Gabriella Sommer, 32, was charged with one count of assaulting, resisting, or impeding a government official in connection with the viral incident, according to court documents.

The alleged assault took place on May 8, as Martin participated in a video interview with Newsmax host Rob Schmitt. 

Martin was answering questions about his work when a woman, later identified as Sommer, approached and spat on his shoulder. 

Before the assault took place, Sommer is seen asking Martin, “Who the f**k are you?” When he turned toward her, she replied: “Are you Ed Martin? You are. Ed Martin.” 

She then lunged forward and spat at Martin, before walking off, shouting, “You’re a disgusting man, Ed Martin. My name is Emily Gabriella Sommer, and you are served.” 

Federal investigators traced an X account they said likely belongs to Sommer, where she allegedly confessed to the assault. 

“Ed, that was me that spit in your face today,” Sommer repeatedly wrote in replies to Martin’s X page. 

The U.S. Marshals Service located Sommer’s residence on Thursday and took her into custody there. 

The case, announced by interim U.S. Attorney for D.C. Jeanine Pirro, is being led by Assistant U.S. Attorney Jacob Green. 

Rep. Randy Fine Implies Gaza Should Be ‘Nuked’ Like Japan After DC Shooting

(Dave DeCamp, Antiwar.comOn Thursday, Rep. Randy Fine, R-Fla., appeared to suggest that Gaza should be “nuked” like Japan was during World War II in response to the shooting in Washington DC that killed two Israeli embassy staffers.

The congressman was asked in an interview on Fox News if the shooting should change the course of Israel’s onslaught on Gaza. “Well, I think it speaks to the importance of the only end of the conflict is the complete and total surrender by those who support Muslim terror,” Fine replied.

“In World War II, we did not negotiate a surrender with the Nazis, we did not negotiate a surrender with the Japanese. We nuked the Japanese twice in order to get unconditional surrender, that needs to be the same here,” Fine added.

Fine, who recently won a special election for Mike Waltz’s seat in the House, is staunchly pro-Israel and has a history of calling for mass violence against Palestinians on X. He celebrated the Israeli military killing of Aysenur Eyzi Eygi, a 26-year-old Turkish-American citizen, who was gunned down in the West Bank, calling her a “Muslim terrorist” even though she was unarmed.

Fine also said in the interview on Thursday that “Palestinianism is violence” and that “Palestinianism” is evil.

The shooting on Wednesday night killed a young couple, Yaron Lischinsky, an Israeli citizen, and Sarah Milgrim, an American woman, as they were walking out of a young diplomats event at the Capital Jewish Museum. The suspect is not Palestinian and has been identified as Elias Rodriguez, 31, of Chicago. A purported manifesto he wrote shows that Gaza was his motive for the attack, and Rodriguez was seen shouting “free Palestine” as he was arrested.

The killings of Lishinsky and Milgrim were not the first murders related to the conflict in Gaza inside the US. In October 2023, a few weeks after the Hamas attack on southern Israel, a six-year-old Palestinian American boy, Wadee Alfayoumi, was stabbed and murdered in Illinois by his landlord, 73-year-old Joseph M. Czuba, who was recently sentenced to 53 years in prison.

This article originally appeared at Antiwar.com.

Was Lawmaker Passed Out Drunk During Trump’s ‘Big Beautiful’ Bill Vote?

(Luis CornelioHeadline USA) House Republicans said that Rep. Andrew Garbarino missed the final vote on President Donald Trump’s “Big, Beautiful” bill because he had nodded off. But former Rep. George Santos claims there was more to the story. 

Santos, the convicted New York Republican, claimed that Garbarino “was not simply sleeping, he was passed out drunk.”

Santos’s claim follows House Speaker Mike Johnson’s admission that Garbarino “fell asleep in the back, no kidding.” 

“I’m going to just strangle him,” Johnson quipped.  

In a follow-up post on X, Johnson called Garbarino “highly regarded” and a “dear friend”—affirming that the bill passed congress thanks to his “unique contributions and tireless efforts.” 

The bill ultimately passed by a 215-214 vote on Thursday morning. 

As reported by the New York Post, Garbarino’s lapse drew fire from New York party leaders, with a source saying that Garbarino is not loyal to Trump.  

“He’s losing his juice as the most senior congressman,” the source said. “I’m getting calls from party leaders that this guy is disloyal to Trump. He was known in the past to be very independent from the party.” 

Trump advisor Roger Stone agreed, affirming that a “Republican primary challenge is in order.” 

Stone added: “If Garbarino can’t be bothered to support the president, on what is perhaps the single most significant tax reduction legislation to pass the House since the 1980s, then the President’s supporters can’t be bothered to support Garbarino.” 

New York Conservative Party chair Gerard Kassa called the missed vote a “very real concern” and a “great disappointment.” 

Rep. Greg Steube, R-Fla., also jumped on the criticism via X, joking, “One Big Beautiful Snooze… After all that posturing on SALT, Garbarino couldn’t even manage to wake himself up to vote for the bill!” 

Despite the backlash, Garbarino brushed off the criticism in a statement, insisting he had simply stepped out.  

“I was moments away from the House floor, to vote ‘yes,’ when the vote was closed,” he said, as quoted by the Post. “While I am frustrated that the vote was closed before I was able to cast my vote, I am proud of the work we accomplished to deliver huge results for Long Island.” 

Gold Correction?

(Brien Lundin, Money Metals News Service) Gold remains firmly in correction mode — even I will readily agree with that.

But one of the most interesting things about this bull market is that, for it at least, the word “correction” has taken on a new meaning.

As you can see below, this has been a remarkable run for gold, one that I will confidently call unprecedented.

What we see here is that, with the exception of the downturn following the U.S. presidential election, gold hasn’t really traced out a typical correction. It’s basically only taken brief breaks from its ascent.

Only a few times has the price challenged the 50-day moving average, and only twice has it fallen below that (and one of those was the post-election decline). And never has it even approached the 200-day moving average, or had its RSI drop into oversold territory.

Those waiting for a classic interim bottom buying opportunity have been frustrated at every turn.

And I believe that those now calling for gold to correct back below the key $3,000 level, or touch the 200-day moving average, will be similarly frustrated.

The reason is that, again, this bull market is unprecedented. This is the first time that gold prices have been driven higher over a long term by the cold, hard calculations of sovereign nations — by central banks deploying overpowering capital in a strategy designed to grant them independence from the U.S. dollar.

So this gold market is not swayed by the classic swings in investor temperament from euphoria to despair, and thus every “correction” has been shorter and shallower than classic technical analysis would have predicted.

Again, I believe we’ll see the same thing play out this time.

The Single Best Analysis of the Gold Market

If you want to truly understand why this gold bull market is so different and compelling, you’ll want to read the just-released In Gold We Trust annual report.

This is, simply put, the single best annual analysis of the gold market produced by anyone. And, amazingly, our friends Ronald-Peter Stoeferle and Mark Valek, along with their team at Incrementum, graciously distribute it entirely free of charge.

The just-released 2025 edition, entitled “The Big Long,” may be the most important edition yet, with dozens of compelling charts detailing why we are still in the early stages of this historic bull market.

Keeping with my theme of the importance of central bank buying, consider this remarkable graphic from the latest IGWT:

This chart shows that we are in another bullish mega-trend, much like the 2000s run that took the gold price up by about eight times. But that market was also driven by investor participation…and we are only now beginning to see investors come into gold and mining stocks in this bull market.

It’s a historic opportunity, and one well presented in the 2025 In Gold We Trust report. I urge you to click on the link below to download it for free now — right here.

To get Brien Lundin’s ongoing commentary on the markets at no charge, click here to subscribe to his free Golden Opportunities newsletter.


Brien Lundin is the publisher and editor of Gold Newsletter, the publication that has been the cornerstone of precious metals advisories since 1971. Mr. Lundin covers not only resource stocks but also the entire world of investing. He also hosts the annual New Orleans Investment Conference. To get Brien Lundin’s ongoing commentary on the markets at no charge, click here to subscribe to his free Golden Opportunities newsletter.

Alleged Anti-Israel Assassin Called for Bombing the New York Times

(Ken Silva, Headline USA) Elias Rodriguez, the 31-year-old Chicago man who allegedly murdered two Israeli embassy staffers Wednesday night, also previously called for bombing The New York Times on his Twitter/X account.

“Progressive tweeps, as much as I love delving into the day’s Discourse, can we PLEASE save the idealistic and high-minded debate over the morality of sending a truck bomb into the offices of The New York Times until *AFTER* we send a truck bomb into the off,” an account attributed to Rodriguez tweeted on Oct. 16.

The same account also posted Rodriguez’s purported manifesto before his attack.

FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino said authorities were working to corroborate unspecified “writings allegedly authored” by Rodriguez. That was likely a reference to the manifesto, which expresses anger over Israel’s ethnic cleansing of Gaza, which was ignited by Hamas’ Oct. 7, 2023, attack that killed 1,200 people and resulted in the abduction of some 250 hostages.

FBI Director Kash Patel has called the killings an “act of terror” and an example of targeted antisemitic violence.

The victims, identified as Yaron Lischinsky, an Israeli citizen and practicing Christian, and Sarah Milgrim, a Jewish American, were a young couple about to be engaged, according to Yechiel Leiter, the Israeli ambassador to the U.S. He said Lischinsky had purchased a ring this week with the intent to propose next week in Jerusalem.

The couple were leaving an event at the Capital Jewish Museum when the suspect, who had been seen pacing outside the museum, approached a group of four people and opened fire, Metropolitan Police Chief Pamela Smith said at a news conference.

Rodriguez then walked into the museum, was detained by security guards and began chanting, “Free, free Palestine,” Smith said.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Ken Silva is the editor of Headline USA. Follow him at x.com/jd_cashless.