Quantcast
Saturday, April 5, 2025

Report: U.S. Officials Don’t Expect Ukraine Peace Deal To Be Reached Soon

(Dave DeCamp, Antiwar.comReuters reported on Tuesday that Trump administration officials are discussing the likelihood that a peace deal to end the Ukraine war will not be reached within the next few months and are drafting plans to increase pressure on both Russia and Ukraine.

US officials told Reuters that neither a full ceasefire nor a lasting peace deal is imminent, meaning the war will drag on, and Ukraine will require more Western military support. The US continues to fuel the war by providing weapons and intelligence to Ukraine.

The report said the US was initially frustrated with Ukraine but is now unhappy with Russia’s unwillingness to accept US terms. Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergey Ryabkov said on Tuesday that Moscow is taking the US proposals seriously but couldn’t accept them in their current form.

The US frustration with Russia has been reflected by President Trump, who recently said that he’s “pissed off” at Russian President Vladimir Putin and threatened to put “secondary tariffs” on Russian oil.

Amid the faltering negotiations, a group of 50 bipartisan senators introduced a bill to place a huge 500% tariff on any country that purchases Russian oil, gas, or uranium if peace talks fail. The bill includes additional sanctions and was introduced by Senators Lindsey Graham (R-SC) and Richard Blumenthal, two staunch supporters of the Ukraine proxy war.

“We are pleased to announce that we have received overwhelming bipartisan support for our primary and secondary sanctions legislation against Russia. The sanctions against Russia require tariffs on countries who purchase Russian oil, gas, uranium, and other products. They are hard hitting for a reason,” Graham and Blumenthal said in a statement.

This article originally appeared at Antiwar.com.

 

Restaurant Group Warns Americans Could Face Higher Prices Dining Out

A restaurant lobbying group said Wednesday that Americans could soon face higher prices when dining out after President Donald Trump announced a broad 10% tariff on imports and higher tariffs on countries that put up significant duties on U.S. imports.

National Restaurant Association President & CEO Michelle Korsmo said restaurant owners of all sizes are already being squeezed and the new tariffs will hurt.

“The biggest concerns for restaurant operators – from community restaurants to national brands – are that tariffs will hike food and packaging costs and add uncertainty to managing availability, while pushing prices up for consumers,” she said. “Restaurant operators know consumers are very sensitive to costs and have kept menu price increases to 30%, while their food costs have gone up 40% in the last five years.”

Korsmo said the association plans to keep the White House in the loop as restaurant owners prepare for fresh challenges.

“Restaurant operators rely on a stable supply of fresh ingredients year-round to provide the menu items their customers want and expect. Many restaurant operators source as many domestic ingredients as they can, but it’s simply not possible for U.S. farmers and ranchers to produce the volumes needed to support consumer demand,” Korsmo said. “The National Restaurant Association will also continue to share with the White House the real-life challenges these changes present for restaurant operators and ask to have food and beverages exempted from these tariffs.”

‘No Constitutional Authority:’ Legal Experts Denounce Recent Injunctions against Trump

In response to multiple federal district judges temporarily halting President Donald Trump’s executive actions, Republicans are taking legislative steps to curtail or even eliminate the use of universal injunctions.

Multiple district judges have recently slapped preliminary injunctions on Trump’s rapid-fire government reforms in response to lawsuits filed in district courts. The nationwide injunctions have raised questions on whether judges should be able to grant relief to parties not included in a case.

During a Wednesday hearing held by the Senate Judiciary Committee, Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, and other Republicans maintained that federal district judges are overstepping their judicial authority when issuing nationwide edicts against legal executive actions.

Some experts called before the committee to testify agreed with Grassley, including Jesse Panuccio, a lawyer who urged lawmakers to pass legislation clarifying that nationwide, non-party injunctions are acts of policy and therefore reserved to the legislative and executive branches only.

“The nationwide, non-party injunction is fundamentally altering our legal and political system,” Panuccio, a partner at Boies Schiller Flexner law firm, said. “This lone district judge…overrides the judgment of the elected branches and creates a new rule to govern us all, achieving what even a single Supreme Court justice could not on his or her own.”

Panuccio added that universal injunctions, besides undermining existing legal rules, sidestep the class-action system’s safeguards. Rather than limiting how and when nationwide injunctions can be issued, Congress should pass legislation ending the practice of non-party injunctions altogether.

“I caution against one potential legislative solution that has been proposed in recent years, [that of] assigning three-judge panels to cases seeking nationwide relief,” Panuccio said. “Creating a procedure for nationwide relief at the trial level would normalize and encourage a practice that has no historical foundation and is generally deleterious to our system of divided powers.”

Grassley recently introduced the Judicial Relief Clarification Act, which would require parties seeking universal relief against the government to use the class action process, as well as forbid federal district courts from issuing nationwide injunctions.

Another expert, Samuel L. Bray, professor of law of Notre Dame Law School, agreed with Panuccio that universal injunctions go beyond the proper exercise of judicial power and should end.

“A universal injunction gives the remedy a class action might produce, but without the plaintiff having to meet any of the requirements of a class action,” Bray said. “There is no constitutional authority for the judge to go on and decide the cases of other people not before the court, or to give remedies to other people not before the court.”

Critics of Trump’s actions, however, have argued that his executive orders have exceeded his authority and that the judges have the power to stop him.

One expert, Stephen Vladeck from Georgetown University Law Center, agreed with Democratic lawmakers that Trump’s actions have necessitated universal injunctions, and that “there’s no serious argument that it’s beyond the federal courts’ powers.”

Rather than limit the judiciary’s power to hold the executive branch accountable, Vladeck argued, lawmakers should instead “focus on reducing the ability of individual parties to manipulate the judicial system” if they want reforms.

Bray, while acknowledging concerns from both sides about the ramifications of ending the practice of universal injunctions, called on lawmakers to consider the long-term ramifications of inaction.

“Democrats will be understandably concerned about taking away a roadblock to action by the current administration. Republicans will be understandably concerned about taking away a roadblock to future administrations,” Bray said. “My plea is that you would see this for the bipartisan problem that it is, and for the constitutional problem that it is, and not just see it through the lens of short-term advantage.”

NYC Mayor Eric Adams Will Skip the Democratic Primary and Run for Reelection as an Independent

(Headline USA) New York City Mayor Eric Adams withdrew from the city’s Democratic primary on Thursday and said he would instead run for reelection as an independent, a move intended to buy him time to save a campaign deeply wounded by a bribery scandal and liberal anger over his warm relationship with President Donald Trump.

In a video announcement, Adams said he will not run in the Democratic primary in June because his recently dismissed criminal case “dragged on too long” while the “false accusations were held over me,” preventing him from campaigning.

“I firmly believe that this city is better served by truly independent leadership, not leaders pulled at by the extremists at the far left or the far right, but instead those rooted in the common middle, the place where the vast majority of New Yorkers are firmly planted,” Adams said.

The decision came after intense speculation over whether Adams would remain in the Democratic primary, which has attracted several serious opponents, including former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo.

In a practical sense, the move will allow Adams to skip directly to the general election in November, giving him more time to campaign unencumbered by the weight of his criminal charges. But it will also further distance Adams from the city’s heavily Democratic electorate and party organization.

The mayor, who had not formed much of a formal reelection apparatus, has struggled to raise money in recent months and suffered a blow when he was denied access to millions of dollars in public matching funds for his campaign because of questions about gaps in his recordkeeping.

A federal judge dismissed Adams’s corruption case on Wednesday, ending a legal saga that left the mayor severely damaged and raised questions about his political independence.

The charges, brought last year during President Joe Biden’s administration, accused Adams of accepting illegal campaign contributions and travel discounts from a Turkish official and others, in exchange for helping Turkey open a diplomatic building without passing fire inspections, among other things.

The mayor pleaded not guilty and was set for a trial in April, but the case was upended after President Donald Trump’s Justice Department moved to drop the charges so that Adams could assist with the president’s immigration agenda, while leaving open the possibility that the case could be revived.

The highly unusual move set off a firestorm of criticism and resignations and thew Adams’s mayoralty in doubt, with many people questioning whether he was now beholden to the Trump administration.

In an order dismissing the case, federal Judge Dale E. Ho denied prosecutors the option to refile the charges and wrote that allowing the case to be revived “would create the unavoidable perception that the mayor’s freedom depends on his ability to carry out the immigration enforcement priorities of the administration.”

In his video announcement, Adams maintained his innocence but acknowledged that the case had “shaken” voters and said he put his trust in the wrong people.

“I know that the accusations leveled against me may have shaken your confidence in me, and that you may rightly have questions about my conduct. And let me be clear, although the charges against me were false, I trusted people I should not have, and I regret that,” he said.

Adams, a former police officer, has governed as a centrist Democrat and often done battle with the city’s progressives. He was a registered Republican in the 1990s but has spent his political career, which includes time as a state senator and Brooklyn borough president, as a Democrat.

The mayor’s political opponents swiftly criticized his decision to run as an independent. Zohran Mamdani, a Democratic state assemblyman running for mayor, said “Regardless of what party Adams flees to, New Yorkers deserve better than a self-interested, disgraced mayor who has and always will put his needs before their own.”

Another candidate, Democratic state Sen. Zellnor Myrie, described the whole ordeal as “a circus.”

Jim Walden, a former prosecutor who is running as an independent, promptly challenged Adams to a debate, arguing that the mayor’s decision came “out of desperation, not principle.”

Adams’ announcement was first reported by Politico.

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

Mayor Resigns after Sending Masturbation Video to City Attorney

(Headline USA) The mayor of one of North Dakota’s largest cities resigned after an investigation into him mistakenly sending a lewd video to the city attorney.

Minot Mayor Tom Ross resigned Tuesday, the same day an investigative report was made public that found Ross sent a video of himself masturbating to City Attorney Stefanie Stalheim in January. He sent the video minutes after the two had a telephone call discussing a police officer’s suicide.

Ross asked Stalheim to delete the video, not to watch it and to keep the incident between them, the report said. Ross told an interviewer he had recorded the video at home during a lunch break and meant to send it to his romantic partner, not to Stalheim. He had said it was “a sexy video for his girlfriend.”

The report said Stalheim struggled with whether to make a formal report. Ross was her direct supervisor, and Stalheim’s annual review was pending at the time, the report said. Her complaint asked for an apology from Ross and that he consider resigning as mayor.
The investigator found Ross’s conduct “directly caused Stalheim’s inability to work in an environment free from unreasonable sexual harassment and created an offensive work environment.”

Ross said Wednesday he takes full responsibility and holds Stalheim “in the utmost regard and respect.” He said he had not resigned earlier “to respect the process.” He plans to focus on himself, healing and moving forward with his family, he said.

Telephone and email messages seeking comment were left for Stalheim Tuesday.

The Minot City Council voted on Tuesday to appoint a mayor from within the council after 15 days, which is the timeframe for citizens to petition for a special election.

Ross was elected mayor in 2022 after serving two years on the city council. Minot, about 50 miles south of the Canadian border, is home to more than 47,000 people.

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

Man Who Escaped ICE Detention in Power Outage Gets Caught on a Denver Bus

(Headline USA) The second of two men who escaped from a Colorado immigration detention center during a power outage last month was arrested Tuesday after being found on a bus in Denver, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement said.

Originally suspected of shoplifting and resisting arrest, the 24-year-old from Venezuela had been picked up by ICE in February and is accused of ties to Tren de Aragua, a gang that gained global notoriety after U.S. President Donald Trump put it at the center of his efforts to deport immigrants accused of crimes.

Geilond Vido-Romero was caught while riding a bus on Colfax Avenue, the city’s main east-west street, said the U.S. Marshals Service in Denver, which helped in the arrest. In a social media post, the agency said he was a “suspected Tren de Aragua (TdA) associate.”

Vido-Romero apparently walked out of doors that opened during a power outage on March 18 at ICE’s privately-operated detention center in Aurora, Colorado. A man from Mexico who escaped at the same time, Joel Gonzalez-Gonzalez, 32, was found three days later in nearby Adams County where he had been previously held in jail.

A U.S. Marshals spokesperson did not immediately respond to a telephone call or email seeking more details about Vido-Romero’s arrest and ties to the gang from Venezuela, which started in a prison there.

Court and police documents show Vido-Romero had lived at the now closed apartment complex in Aurora where some armed members of the gang were seen entering an apartment on a viral video that caught Trump’s attention during last year’s presidential campaign. Some members of the gang were also later accused of kidnapping and assaulting two residents there in December.

Vido-Romero was originally arrested Feb. 26 by police at the Park Meadows mall after a running from officers in the parking garage, according to an arrest affidavit. He was suspected of misdemeanor theft for allegedly stealing a white puffer jacket and jewelry that was stuffed into one if its pockets, it said. ICE said it found him in the nearby jail and arrested him the next day.

He does not have an attorney listed as representing him in that case.

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

New Bill Would Slash ATF Firearms Regulations

(José Niño, Headline USA) A Georgia congressman wants to protect gun owners from excessive harassment from the ATF

Last Thursday, Rep. Andrew Clyde, R-GA, introduced the SHORT Act, or Stop Harassing Owners of Rifles Today Act, which would repeal certain provisions of the National Firearms Act (NFA).

This bill would specifically target regulations on short-barreled rifles (SBRs), short-barreled shotguns (SBSs), and “any other weapons” (AOWs). Its purpose is to eliminate what Cylde views as unconstitutional taxation, registration, and regulation imposed by the NFA.

The legislation would also prevent the ATF from imposing similar restrictions in the future.

On Monday, Clyde made the case for his bill on X: 

“The Biden-Harris Administration weaponized the draconian NFA to turn law-abiding Americans—including disabled veterans—with pistol-braced firearms into criminals.

The SHORT Act provides a permanent solution to end this tyranny.

Congress must act to protect our #2A rights.”

Clyde has introduced the SHORT Act several times in Congress in an effort to protect gun rights

During the 117th Congress (2021-2022), Clyde introduced the SHORT Act on Sept. 29, 2022, as H.R. 9033, while Marshall introduced the Senate version, S.4986, on Sept. 28, 2022.

In the 118th Congress (2023-2024). Clyde reintroduced the SHORT Act on Jan. 31, 2023, as H.R. 646.

These repeated introductions reflect Clyde’s ongoing effort to repeal elements of the NFA that regulate short-barreled rifles, shotguns, and other weapons.

Moreover, this legislation was introduced as a response to the Biden Administration’s reclassification of firearms equipped with stabilizing braces as short-barreled rifles, which brought them under the NFA’s jurisdiction. 

This reinterpretation led to a ban that required gun owners to either register their firearms under an “Amnesty Registration” program or risk being deemed in violation of federal law. 

Critics argue that this policy disproportionately impacts law-abiding citizens, including disabled veterans who rely on stabilizing braces for accessibility, and does little to tackle crime.

In correspondence with Headline USA, Taylor Rhodes, the Director of Communications at the National Association of Gun Rights, expressed his support for Clyde’s legislation initiative as a “good first step.” However, he said that the pro-gun organization prefers “a full repeal of the NFA.”

José Niño is the deputy editor of Headline USA. Follow him at x.com/JoseAlNino

Florida’s New Congressman Once Celebrated the IDF Killing an American Citizen

(Dave DeCamp, Antiwar.comA Florida state senator who once celebrated the Israeli military’s killing of an American citizen and has a history of calling for mass violence against Palestinians has won a special election for Mike Waltz’s seat in the House for Florida’s 6th Congressional District.

Randy Fine, who received a strong endorsement from President Trump, is extremely pro-Israel and has a history of calling on social media for mass violence against Palestinians.

Fine’s win on Tuesday night has put a spotlight on some of his more egregious posts, including his giddy response to the killing of Aysenur Eyzi Eygi, a 26-year-old Turkish-American citizen who was gunned down by the IDF while peacefully protesting Israeli settlements in the West Bank last year.

Eygi was born in Turkey and moved to the US with her family before her first birthday. She was shot in the head by an IDF soldier, and investigations have found that she was standing peacefully about 200 meters away from Israeli troops during the incident.

“Throw rocks, get shot. One less #MuslimTerrorist. #FireAway,” Fine wrote on X after Eygi’s killing.

In 2021, a user questioned Fine’s support for Israel and asked him how he “slept at night” and shared a picture of what appeared to be an infant killed by an airstrike. Fine replied, “Quite well, actually! Thanks for the pic!”

Since the Hamas attack on southern Israel and the start of Israel’s genocidal war on Gaza, Fine has repeatedly called for mass violence against Palestinians. “May the streets of Gaza run red with their blood,” Fine wrote on X on October 7, 2023.

In response to a video of President Trump discussing Israeli hostages in Gaza, Fine said, “So much for ‘innocent Palestinian civilians.’ #BombsAway.”

Fine has also equated all Palestinians with Hamas. “‘Palestinian’ = Hamas. #BombsAway,” he said in another post. He once said that “Palestinian” is ” just another word for Demon.”

Fine has called for Israel to cut off aid into Gaza and said it was “about time” when Israel imposed a total blockade on all goods entering the Strip last month. “Stop the trucks. Let them eat rockets. There are plenty of those. #BombsAway,” he said in a post in December 2023.

This article originally appeared at Antiwar.com.

 

Musk and Alleged Baby Mother Headed to Maury? Host Weighs In

(Luis CornelioHeadline USA) Tech mogul Elon Musk and influencer Ashley St. Clair now have an open invitation from the nationally syndicated tabloid show Maury to finally settle the question of whether Musk is the father of St. Clair’s child. 

The invitation—issued Wednesday through an account seemingly affiliated with host Maury Povich—appeared to be a mocking response to the ongoing Musk-St. Clair drama that has social media on edge.

The duo allegedly welcomed a child in 2024, after briefly meeting in 2023. St. Clair claims Musk has been ignoring her calls and cut the child’s financial support by 60%, forcing her to sell her $100,000 Tesla vehicle. 

On Sunday, Musk responded to a video showing St. Clair selling the vehicle outside her Manhattan apartment, stating that he has willingly given millions to St. Clair despite not having confirmed the child’s paternity. 

“I don’t know if the child is mine or not, but am not against finding out,” Musk wrote via X. “No court order is needed.” He noted that he has given St. Clair $2.5 million in addition to vowing to send $500,000 per year. 

In response to Musk’s complaints, an X account called “The Maury Show” joined the drama with a simple challenge: “Wanna find out?” The post quickly went viral, garnering more than 800,000 views. 

While Musk has not responded to the challenge, such a show is unlikely to happen given that Maury was canceled in 2022, with only reruns airing on several networks. 

St. Clair has remained relatively silent this week, only firing back at Musk in a scathing X post: “Elon, we asked you to confirm paternity through a test before our child (who you named) was even born. You refused. … America needs you to grow up, you petulant man-child.” 

Earlier in the weekend, she had spoken to reporters in Manhattan while handing over the keys to her Tesla to a Carvana salesperson. 

“I’m selling it because I need to make up for the 60% cut that Elon made to our son’s child support,” she said. 

Asked if Musk was being “vindictive” after she announced the child’s birth in February despite his wishes, she added: “Yeah, that’s his modus operandi, when women speak out.” 

When questioned about Musk’s potential reaction, she quipped, “You can check the stocks. I’m not the only one who is cleaning up after his messes.” 

Indians Turning to Gold as Stocks Sag

(Mike Maharrey, Money Metals News Service) Indian investors are turning to gold as the domestic stock market tanks.

This isn’t a surprise, but there is a twist. Indians are increasingly turning to ETFs to gain exposure to the yellow metal.

Indians have a long love affair with gold. The country ranks as the second-largest gold market. The yellow metal is highly valued as a store of wealth, especially in poorer rural regions. Around two-thirds of India’s gold demand comes from beyond the urban centers, where large numbers of people operate outside the tax system. Many Indians use gold jewelry not only as adornment but as their savings.

According to the Financial Times, “Indians now own about 25,000 tonnes of gold and have been cashing in on the rally by taking out loans from banks, using their holdings as collateral while prices remain elevated.”

Given the cultural context, the quick pivot to gold during a bear stock market is not surprising.

The Indian Nifty 50 index is down 0.5 percent year to date, with the broader Indian stock market down over 5 percent. Meanwhile, gold has ranked as the best-performing asset class, with year-to-date returns well over 10 percent.

The Rise of the Indian Gold ETF

Interestingly, Indian investors are turning to ETFs to gain exposure to gold.

A gold ETF is backed by a trust company that holds metal owned and stored by the trust. In most cases, investing in an ETF does not entitle you to any amount of physical gold. You own a share of the ETF, not gold itself. ETFs are a convenient way for investors to play the gold market, but owning ETF shares is not the same as holding physical gold.

About 2.2 tonnes of gold flowed into India-based ETFs last month, pushing collective holdings to 64.6 tonnes. Cumulative Indian ETF assets under management (AUM) have nearly doubled year on year.

In rupee terms, ETF holding surged by ₹19 billion ($227 million). This was off the record pace in January but still far above average.

This occurred despite significant ETF redemptions, reflecting some profit-taking as gold prices surged.

A World Gold Council spokesperson said there is a shift from gold jewelry to “pure investments,” redirecting “free cash flows” toward ETFs in the midst of “ongoing global and domestic economic and policy uncertainty.”

According to Metals Focus, “The weakness in Indian equities is the big reason for investors rotating into ETFs.

That’s not to say investors are spurning physical gold. According to the World Gold Council, bar and coin demand has also remained strong, even as jewelry sales have dropped due to high prices and significant premiums.

Analysts told the Financial Times that the quick rotation out of stocks could account for the rapid increase in gold ETF holdings. Their electronic nature makes it possible to quickly shift money in and out of gold without having to physically move metal. Analysts also said, “The lack of new sovereign gold bond issuance by the Indian government and increased demand for multi-asset funds that include gold ETFs.”

However, depending on ETFs as a gold investment introduces significant counterparty risk. While the investment class takes advantage of the convenience of ETF investing, the vast majority of Indians will likely stick to physical metal to preserve their wealth.


Mike Maharrey is a journalist and market analyst for Money Metals with over a decade of experience in precious metals. He holds a BS in accounting from the University of Kentucky and a BA in journalism from the University of South Florida.