(Jacob Bruns, Headline USA) As the left makes a final push to secure a perpetual election advantage under the name of “voting rights,” they have turned to the United States Postal Service, which they hope will function as a vote-by-mail machine, Restoration News reported.
The left is operating via the American Postal Workers Union, which launched a bid in May to seize control of the USPS Board of Governors and oust Postmaster General Louis DeJoy, who was appointed by former President Donald Trump.
The board consists of nine members, meaning the left would have to maneuver to secure at least six spots to gain the supermajority necessary to forcing its will. Unfortunately for the left, the law allows for no more than five members of either party to be on the board.
Thus, the left has turned to “independent” Amber McReynolds, who used to run the National Vote at Home Institute.
Further, the board has two outgoing members, one Democrat, Donald Lee Moak, and one Republican, William Zollers.
But members of the APWU have demanded that both Moak and Zollers be replaced by Democrats in order to secure justice, despite the law disallowing such a maneuver.
Board members are chosen by the U.S. Senate, which will have the power to halt the far-left takeover if its members wish. In order for Republicans to put a stop the scheme, they will need the support of either Sens. Joe Machin, D-W.Va., or Kyrsten Sinema, D-Ariz.
In order to fill the upcoming openings, the left reportedly has numerous candidates, each of whom supports transforming the organization into a mail-in ballot machine for churning out votes.
First, in order to combine their strategy with some political know-how, the left may turn to former Detroit Rep. Brenda Lawrence, a Democrat and former USPS worker.
Rep. Carolyn Maloney, D-N.Y., has also been floated as a potential replacement.
Maloney helped pass the $57 billion Postal Reform Act of 2022, which added new mail delivery services and expanded postal worker healthcare packages.
(Jacob Bruns, Headline USA) A Toronto-area school principal killed himself after being singled out and humiliated during a diversity, equity and inclusion training session, Hot Air reported.
Principal Richard Bilkszto had initially sued the Toronto District School Board after he was berated for his “white supremacy” during a DEI training session.
Bilkszto was allegedly defending the nation of Canada as less racist than the United States when his “white supremacy” was brought to his attention by DEI trainer Kike Ojo-Thompson, CEO of the far-left KOJO Institute.
“To sit here and talk about facts and figures and then walk into the classroom tomorrow and say ‘Canada is just as bad as the United States,’ I think we are doing an incredible disservice to our learners,” Bilkszto said.
Ojo-Thompson held a series of sessions for TDSB executives in which she made standard anti-racist claims. The West, she argued, but Canada in particular, is a “bastion of white supremacy and colonialism.”
The anti-racist also noted with strong religious overtones that “your job in this work as white people is to believe.” The next DEI session, Ojo-Thompson, alluding to Bilkszto’s push back, claimed to have been “accosted by white supremacy.”
Bilkszto’s actions, however, were not without consequence. He was put on sick leave for six weeks, after which time he attempted to return to work only to find that he had been demoted.
He filed suit against the school district, which in turn filed against KOJO. But before things could progress in court, Bilkszto took his own life.
With his family's permission, I am very saddened to release this statement about the passing of my client, Richard Bilkszto. pic.twitter.com/mNzMAxkp5V
The TDSB was sure to get out ahead of any accusations after Belkszto’s passing, offering kind words despite the recent attempt to force him out.
“Our hearts go out to Richard’s family and loved ones,” TDSB spokesperson Ryan Bird wrote.
“He was a strong advocate for students — particularly those in adult and alternative education — and worked tirelessly to create an environment that fostered student success for students of all ages.”
(Ezekiel Loseke, Headline USA) A Massachusetts man called the police after he received a letter in the mail criticizing his Black Lives Matter sign and other woke propaganda on his house.
Dave Thomas, of Hanover, received the letter and called the police because he and his family were frightened by its contents, according to WCVB-TV.
The letter was sent through the postal service and had no name or return address listed, according to The Blaze.
Thomas told WCVB-TV that his family was frightened by the greeting card that was sent to their house criticizing his left-wing decorations and telling them to move to another state.
“Hi neighbor, thank you for helping keep our property taxes so low due to the fact your home is a [expletive]hole,” the letter began. The letter continued with a bullet-point list of demands:
Pull the Sanders sticker off the mailbox, it’s the law.
Finally, move to California or Oregon so you can enjoy living with the rest of the NUTS!”
The above quotations compose the entirety of the letter, except the omitted profanity.
“It was just kind of a little frightening,” Thomas said, despite the lack of any threats or calls to violence in the letter. He reported that he would not abide by the directions in the ‘frightening’ letter.
“”We have every right to put these flags in front of our house and to express our opinions,” he said. “I’ve been seeing a lot of people expressing their opinions in a lot more impolite ways.”
The police informed Thomas that nothing in the letter was criminal, and the author of the letter was also protected by the First Amendment.
Thomas reported that this arrangement of mutual freedom made him anxious.
“We’re just keeping our eyes open and making sure that nothing else happens ,” he said. “It’s a little nerve-wracking, and it makes me angry and upset.”
(Molly Bruns, Headline USA) Cybersecurity firm Mandiant discovered that Chinese media company Haixun Press placed several articles promoting China on American news websites.
The organization distributed over 30 articles to outlets worldwide, including in at least 32 different news publications in the U.S., such as The Arizona Republic and Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, the Daily Caller reported.
Mandiant investigated the depths of Haixun’s influence in the United States, and suspected that the organization possibly funded two protests in Washington D.C. in 2022.
Mandiant alleged that the Chinese organization followed up the protests with divisive news coverage. One article criticized the government’s decision to import all goods manufactured in Xinjiang, China due to the Chinese Communist Party’s forced labor of the Uyghur Muslims.
The article immediately followed a June 2022 protest advocating for greater use of solar panels. Xinjiang exported over half of the world’s solar panels.
The influence campaign, also called “HaiEnergy,” made use of social media along with a press release service called Times News Wire to post stories about the protest.
The Times News Wire hosted a press release criticizing former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s visit to Taiwan, which The Arizona Republic re-published.
The article accused Pelosi of visiting the island for a “silly photo op,” and claimed “the Biden administration has enough problems at home and abroad that it doesn’t need to look for them in China and Taiwan.”
The PittsburghPost-Gazette also used copy from the Times New Wire, most notably an article titled “The Frequent Shootings in the United States are the Greatest Contempt for Human Rights.”
Mandiant investigators suspected that the HaiEnergy campaign and the Times News Wire connected on various topics. there not enough evidence to confirm that they were directly linked.
Recent revelations of Chinese activity on the American continent indicated steps towards aggressive interference—including hacking into the emails of high-level State Department officials, including Chinese Ambassador Nicholas Burns and assistant secretary of state for East Asia, Daniel Kritenbrink.
(Corine Gatti, Headline USA) Vice President Kamala Harris was blasted after traveling to Florida, claiming the state’s new curriculum on African-American history painted slavery as “beneficial.”
“They decided middle school students will be taught that enslaved people benefited from slavery,” the vice president said. “They insult us in an attempt to gaslight us and we will not stand for it. There is a national agenda. Extremist so-called leaders … want to replace history with lies.”
Extremists are pushing forward revisionist history. They insult us in an attempt to gaslight us, and we will not stand for it. pic.twitter.com/ipCXuGjWTw
The attempts to further her own political agenda backfired after Dr. William Allen, who helped write the curriculum and who is a descendant of slaves, fact-checked Harris. In fact, during a radio interview, Allen was asked if the wording of the curriculum should be changed after Harris’s criticism.
He said, no.
“My great grandfather is someone who came from the islands and who was enslaved here… from his resourcefulness, we derive benefits,” Allen said in a radio interview. “I think anyone who would try to change that language would be denying that great-grandfather Cidipus made any contribution. I certainly could not endorse doing that,” the 79-year-old noted.
“The only criticism I’ve encountered so far [on the new curriculum] is a single one that was articulated by the vice president, and which was an error,” Allen also told ABC News.
Harris’s political stunt started after the Florida Board of Education approved a new social studies curriculum on July 19, which included an African American History section. However, there has been significant backlash from opponents, including Harris, who were unhappy with certain aspects of the curriculum.
Meanwhile, Dr. Allen and other members who worked on the curriculum issued a statement refuting Harris’s claims. They said Florida students deserved to learn how slaves took advantage of circumstances they were in to “benefit themselves and the community of African descendants,” members wrote.
“It is disappointing, but nevertheless unsurprising, that critics would reduce months of work to create Florida’s first ever stand-alone strand of African American History Standards to a few isolated expressions without context,” they concluded. “We encourage everyone to view these robust standards for themselves.”
Fentanyl, a highly lethal synthetic opioid that became widely popular in the United States after the implementation of open border policies by the Biden administration, became a big concern that prompted calls to crack down on fentanyl trafficking, the Daily Caller reported.
The Fentanyl Kills Act would enable federal prosecutors to charge drug traffickers who “produce, manufacture, distribute, sell or knowingly finance or transport” fentanyl with attempted murder charges.
“Any individual who has [been] found to [have] trafficked fentanyl shall be deemed to have attempted to perpetrate murder,” the bill reads. Among the co-sponsors of the bill are Reps. David Valadao, R-Calif., and Jim Baird, R-Ind.
The bill expansively defined “trafficked fentanyl,” including any efforts to manufacture fentanyl outside the country, to then transport it later to the United States. The bill also expanded the penalty of attempted murder charges to the manufacturing of precursor chemicals that are used to produce fentanyl, the news source reported.
“The fentanyl crisis that is gripping our country and local communities is a serious problem and requires serious consequences for those who peddle this dangerous drug,” Lawler said.
“The Fentanyl Kills Act takes drug traffickers head-on, imposing serious penalties for these criminals who know exactly what they are doing.”
Fentanyl is the most lethal drug in the country that is responsible for approximately two-thirds of all 107,081 overdose deaths in 2022, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported.
The Drug Enforcement Administration said that the drug is “100 times more potent than morphine and 50 times more potent than heroin,” adding that a fatal dose of fentanyl may be as little as 2 milligrams.
To increase their potency and fuel drug addictions by customers, dealers who sell other drugs often mix fentanyl with their products, the Caller reported.
To pass the Senate, Lawler’s bill would require votes from Democrats that it may never get because they usually oppose strengthening criminal penalties on drug traffickers, arguing that such measures will disproportionately hurt racial minorities.
(Ken Silva, Headline USA) CIA Director William Burns reportedly said last week that his agency is rebuilding its network of spies in China, which were compromised for more than a decade, likely due to a Chinese mole embedded within the FBI.
“We’ve made progress, and we’re working very hard over recent years to ensure that we have strong human intelligence capability to complement what we can acquire through other methods,” Burns reportedly told the Aspen Security Forum.
“The U.S. on the one hand keeps spreading disinformation on so-called ‘Chinese spying and cyber attacks,’ and on the other hand tells the public about its large-scale intelligence activities targeting China,” She reportedly said, adding that China will “take all measures necessary to safeguard national security.”
In 2018, Foreign Policy reported that the number of CIA assets caught in China was around 30 since 2010—attributing the problem to “botched CIA communications.”
But more recently, a new book from veteran national security reporter James Bamford suggests that a Chinese mole within the FBI contributed to the CIA assets being compromised.
“Over at least the next six years and possibly much longer, he took over the role of FBI mole,” Bamford wrote of the FBI mole, Alexander Yuk Ching Ma.
“Ma had extensive knowledge of the CIA’s highly secret covcom techniques by which CIA officers communicated with their sources. Every few months, once he had accumulated a load of secrets, he would call his handlers,” Bamford added.
“They would then book him a hotel room in Shanghai, pick him up at the airport, and take him into town, where he would hand over his secrets and be debriefed by agents of the Shanghai State Security Bureau.”
Ma was arrested in August 2020, and his criminal case is ongoing in Hawaii—with many of the records remaining under seal.
Neither the CIA nor the FBI has publicly spoken about the role Ma may have played in compromising spies in China.
(Robert Jonathan, Headline USA) It seems unlikely that Tucker Carlson and Mike Pence will be hanging out at the same Labor Day barbecue, if published comments attributed to the former Fox News star are any indication.
Writing on his Substack page that is called “The Dossier,” investigative journalist Jordan Schachtel revealed on Tuesday that he obtained an advance copy of the Chadwick Moore-authored Carlson biography
In it, the ex-FNC host purportedly provided a candid assessment of Donald Trump’s 2016 running mate. Carlson frequently interviewed the-then Indiana congressman and apparently formed an opinion at that time.
“I’ve been around him a lot, and always felt that he was a totally sinister figure, craven and dishonest. Everything about Pence is false,” Tucker reportedly told Moore.
He also reportedly described the politician as “creepy as hell.”
Unfortunately, according to Carlson, it got even worse.
“Carlson tells the author that he believes Pence purposely sabotaged the Trump Administration over the entire course of his tenure. He believes that the Pence insubordination campaign went into overdrive during the covid hysteria era,” Schachtel asserted.
None of those alleged machinations takes the 45th president off the hook for the administration’s decison-making, Carlson conceded, but “Carlson perceives Pence’s role as someone deployed into the administration to ‘undermine Trump and to keep an eye on him,'” Schachtel explained.
Tucker effectively ended Pence’s 2024 presidential aspirations when, under Carlson’s questioning at the 2023 Family Leader Summit in Iowa, the former governor and VP seemed far more interested in giving Ukraine an ongoing blank check rather than delivering needed assistance to dystopian U.S. cities.
Following the Iowa Event, Carlson joked to a Turning Point USA crowd about his dialogue with Pence that “You don’t feel good when you beat your 5-year-old in soccer or ping pong.”
Absent extraordinary circumstances, i.e., primarily Trump’s legal woes, it’s difficult to see a path to the GOP nomination for an establishment candidate like Pence, let alone a RINO like Asa Hutchinson, whose career also cratered during the same event when he was on stage with Carlson.
A frequent guest on the cancelled Tucker Carlson Tonight broadcast, Moore began writing the book well before Fox News abruptly parted ways with its host.
As a result of the timing (and its aftermath, which is often everything), however, the bio — which has a formal Aug. 1 release date — is likely to become an instant best-seller.
Carlson is in the process of launching a new media company, with Twitter as its initial platform.
In the pre-order phase, the hardcover version of Tucker is currently number one in biographies on Amazon.
Officials say FedNow will allow individuals and businesses to initiate instant funds transfers between banks. Critics warn that FedNow could be a prelude to central bank digital currency (CBDC) that threatens financial privacy and freedom.
Fund transfers between banks made through FedNow will settle directly in accounts at the central bank. Once Fed accounts become widely adopted and used for payments, critics fear it’s only one additional step to convert the “dollars” used in transactions into “FedCoin”—a proposed digital token to be issued directly by the central bank.
To be sure, similar arguments could be used to justify a CBDC as have been made with FedNow, e.g., it will improve the speed, efficiency and reliability of payments.
However, the FedNow system is really just a major upgrade to the highly deficient ACH payment system that has limped along for decades, with its very slow clearing time, lack of fraud prevention and other problems.
Concerns about FedNow appear to be overblown, and FedNow should not be conflated with totalitarian CBDC schemes. Here is what Emile Phaneuf of the American Institute for Economic Research writes on the risks of CBDCs:
Risks CBDCs present include the loss of settlement finality that comes with physical cash (as abandoning cash accompanies the push for CBDCs), loss of financial privacy, easy seizure of assets, loss of the ability to resolve problems at a local level with a commercial bank (as it would be doubtful that a central bank would come to be known for its customer service) …
…outright prohibition on spending or purchase limits with certain merchants or on certain products, and (perhaps most importantly) the paradigm shift from money as an exercise of economic freedom to one of social engineering by central banks and their respective governments.
The latter could manifest itself in various ways, including (to name just a few) negative interest rates (essentially a confiscation of one’s savings), the expiry of one’s money (with a date determined by the issuing central bank or its government) — or even discouraging the consumption of products like gasoline, plane tickets or red meat in order to enforce a climate agenda.
The weaponization of the monetary system for social-engineering purposes has been in the works for decades. The abandonment of hard currency, backed by physical gold and silver, gave politicians and central bankers the power to manipulate the supply and value of the currency for their own ends.
Under a fiat currency regime, central planners arbitrarily try to determine how much inflation (i.e., currency depreciation) to inflict on the economy.
Under the Federal Reserve’s dual mandate, central bankers are supposed to ensure “price stability.” Instead, they openly flout that mandate, redefining “stable prices” as annual price inflation of 2%. Of course, the Fed is failing even to deliver on that objective by allowing inflation to run much hotter than 2%!
Those who wish to preserve their purchasing power over time while protecting their financial privacy should beware of central bankers’ new campaign to promote digital Fed accounts.
Hard money (gold and silver) held outside the banking system remains the soundest alternative to fiat currency in all its manifestations.
Stefan Gleason is President of Money Metals Exchange, the company recently named “Best Overall Online Precious Metals Dealer” by Investopedia. A graduate of the University of Florida, Gleason is a seasoned business leader, investor, political strategist, and grassroots activist. Gleason has frequently appeared on national television networks such as CNN, FoxNews, and CNBC and in hundreds of publications such as the Wall Street Journal, TheStreet, and Seeking Alpha.
Last week, for example, there were at least two major disclosures from Congress that, due to previous leaks and investigations, may have seemed a bit anticlimactic:
Meanwhile, on other side of the U.S. Capitol, Sen. Chuck Grassley released a long awaited FBI memo confirming that then-Vice President Joe Biden and his degenerate son had demanded bribes as aquid pro quo in return for coercing Ukraine to end a corruption investigation into Burisma oligarch Mykola Zlochevsky.
(Note: The subsequent arrest of whistleblower Alexander Smirnov—a longtime confidential FBI source, who they now claim lied about the bribery allegation—only seems, from one perspective, to reaffirm the deep state’s desperation to discredit the investigation.)
Note the common thread in both: that the FBI was aware in advance—and actively sought to deceive the public through the omission of key information—about something that ultimately had a major impact in undermining the Trump presidency.
While the laptop confirmation would have swung the course of the 2020 election, the Burisma memo was exactly the exculpatory evidence needed to explode House Democrats’ first partisan impeachment campaign. That also impacted the election in a number of ways, some more subtle and indirect than others.
THE UNBROKEN CHAIN
If, for example, the country had not been distracted by the bogus impeachment, it might have been able to prepare earlier for the coming pandemic—the warning signs of which began in China around November 2019.
Instead, it would take another five months before then-President Donald Trump, following his acquittal, would be able to shift his focus to the global health crisis by declaring a national emergency.
Democrats’ first impulse, of course, was to second-guess Trump by downplaying its severity, until they got the party memo that the plan was to leverage the virus to their own political advantage.
Without the pandemic threat, the Left never would have been able to push through the massive mail-in voting scheme that they actually had begun planning well before COVID-19 was on anyone’s radar (except, of course, for those who attended the notorious Event 201 conference, where globalists like Bill Gates predicted the pandemic a month before it happened).
That unbroken chain of events—leading from Trump’s July 2019 phone call with television star and newly elected Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy, to the Nov. 4, 2020 theft of the election by a cabal of corrupt co-conspirators—may still be considered conjecture, but with the benefit of hindsight it has been gradually confirmed.
Thus, the question looms: If the FBI had the evidence validating Trump’s request that Zelenskyy reopen the dormant Burisma corruption investigation, why was FBI Director Christopher Wray so hell-bent on keeping it from public view at the time, and why has the Trump-appointed chief spook continued to fight against transparency in light of all that has happened since?
SCRAMBLING FOR COVER
When taken together, the revelations about the FBI’s role in suppressing the laptop from Hell and burying the Burisma bribery scandal might just have chilling implications.
One could make the logical leap that, perhaps, the conspiracy to throw the 2020 election in Joe Biden’s favor was linked in some way to pre-existing extralegal Ukraine operations that the government was terrified Trump might discover.
As Biden himself confirmed in a 2016 conversation with then-Ukraine President Petro Poroshenko following Trump’s election, “This is getting very, very close to what I don’t want to have happen.”
Here’s corrupt, compromised, criminal biden ON TAPE trying to cover up his corruption in Ukraine. pic.twitter.com/O9EvObaAAR
Specifically, according to the audio recording made public last month, Biden feared that if Ukraine were to ask for additional funding, Trump might begin asking questions about what the money was going toward.
“I don’t want Trump to get in the position where he thinks he’s about to buy on to a policy where the financial system is going to collapse and he’s going to be looked to to pour more money into Ukraine,” Biden said.
It is also known that Biden made a secret trip to Ukraine just three days before Trump’s inauguration.
While some might assume he was just going there to collect his $5 million bribe from Burisma, I suspect something more nefarious was afoot on the banks of the Dnieper River.
PULP NONFICTION
Most people by now have read enough online clickbait to know that the once-obscure cinematic term “MacGuffin,” popularized by Alfred Hitchcock, refers to the mysterious object being pursued in many film noir stories—as well as in more contemporary movies, like Pulp Fiction and The Big Lebowski, that were inspired by them.
Oftentimes, the object being pursued itself becomes immaterial as the intrigue deepens and the stakes continue to rise, but it offers a convenient reason for the protagonists to get involved in such a caper in the first place. Thus, symbolically speaking, the MacGuffin is little more than a plot device for whatever launches the complex quagmire of unfolding action.
Ostensibly, the reason America is investing its considerable treasure to defend Ukraine in its nearly decade-long war with Russia—likely soon to result in more American bloodshed—is to protect “democracy.”
But with the Biden administration showing callous disregard for protecting our own democracy at home, that explanation is, as they say in Kyiv, a steaming crock of лайно́.
With that in mind, any of the six theories below—or, perhaps, some combination thereof—may be the true reason that the U.S. has become immersed in its latest never-ending war.
While some may be a bit farther afield than others, all share the common trait that the motive must be something important enough not only to warrant a costly and brutal global conflict, but also to justify the destruction of America’s core values by weaponizing our own intelligence apparatus against us and using it to install a fake leader who has long been on the Ukrainian payroll.
• Money-laundering
Let’s begin with the low-hanging fruit. Quite simply, Ukraine and its war are the ultimate money-laundering scheme. We have seen already several “clerical” errors that have led the Pentagon to funnel billions in unauthorized funding to this war effort. And yet, on the output end, the State Department has acknowledged there is no way of tracking how the money gets spent.
Taxpayer money goes in, bribes for Biden family members come out, but the rest remains a mystery. Is it any wonder that both the White House and Senate Democrats have adamantly refused any sort of formal oversight?
• Nazi nation-building
It may have been Russian leader Vladimir Putin who propelled into public awareness the possible presence of Nazis in Ukraine. Indeed, the Azov Brigade, which has adopted some of the Hitler regime’s symbols, is accused of harboring sympathies for the Third Reich. But what if there were real Nazis pulling the strings behind these brown-shirts to effectively establish a Fourth Reich?
At least two powerful and influential men fit the bill: Klaus Schwab, the chair of the World Economic Forum, born in 1938, was the son of the director of a Zurich-based Nazi engineering contractor. And George Soros, born a Hungarian Jew in 1930, was a Nazi collaborator himself as a teenager.
Both have a strong penchant for nation-building in the Nazi fashion, mixing extreme-left collectivism with far-right statism to establish a New World Order in which the one-world government fulfills all the material needs of its serfs in return for their complete and utter subordination to it.
Such a utopian feudal-state would need its seat of government, which may explain why Soros has played such an active role in funding and coordinating Ukraine’s so-called anti-corruption efforts ever since the 2014 U.S. backed color revolution ousted its Russia-friendly government.
Meanwhile, the WEF has been eager to get in on the action, making Ukraine a major part of its 2023 agenda and inviting Zelenskyy’s wife to attend.
“Ukraine has biological research facilities which we are now quite concerned Russian forces may be seeking to gain control of,” she said in response to a question from Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., as to whether the country had any chemical or biological weapons.
As the ranking minority member of the Senate Intelligence Committee, one of the privileged few in Congress to get regular security briefings, Rubio must have known the answer already.
It was subsequently alleged that Hunter Biden might have helped to secure $500,000 in funding for one of the companies conducting the research, Metabiota.
• Child-sex trafficking
The issue of child-sex trafficking has only recently spilled out into the open, courtesy of the blockbuster movie Sound of Freedom.
The problem in Ukraine has been acknowledged by organizations like the United Nations and the U.S. Department of Labor, with the latter noting that three of the country’s top exports relying on child labor were amber, coal and pornography.
The U.S. State Department, meanwhile, insisted that while Ukraine did not “fully meet the minimum standards for the elimination of trafficking” it was “making significant efforts to do so.”
Could Secretary of State Tony Blinken be directing his department (which includes under its purview the CIA) to cover up the crime scene?
It’s anyone’s guess why America’s ruling class would want to preserve a robust child-porn industry, but the proof’s in the grooming.
President Joe Biden has recently been accused of creating the “the largest child trafficking ring in U.S. history,” according to GOP senators. And it’s quite possible that when it comes to importing child sex slaves, there is a 10% cut for the “Big Guy.”
However, it is clear that the Democratic National Committee was actively working with the Ukrainian government at the time to defeat Trump.
DNC staffer Alexandra Chalupa, the daughter of two Ukrainian immigrants, led an effort to collude with the Poroshenko administration in obtaining dirt on Trump’s campaign—and ultimately succeeded in helping to bring down Trump campaign chair Paul Manafort.
“The Ukrainian efforts had an impact in the race, helping to force Manafort’s resignation and advancing the narrative that Trump’s campaign was deeply connected to Ukraine’s foe to the east, Russia,” Politico reported.
During his infamous phone call with Zelenskyy, President Trump later brought up the so-called cybersecurity firm CrowdStrike, a paid operative of the DNC.
Trump appeared to speculate that the firm may have taken the hacked DNC servers to Ukraine after conducting a highly secretive and proprietary forensic analysis, which the FBI, led by James Comey, accepted in good faith.
Some have claimed that murdered DNC staffer Seth Rich was responsible for leaking the damning batch of emails to Wikileaks, and others say that Clinton campaign chief John Podesta accidentally fell victim to a routine phishing operation.
However, based on the FBI’s acceptance of its narrative, CrowdStrike’s claim that Russians had hacked the DNC stood as the smoking-gun evidence used to validate all that followed concerning the Steele dossier and alleged Trump pee tapes. And the hacked servers have never been seen since.
Could Putin be trying to clear his good name by recovering the long-lost mainframe? And what might the Democrats be trying to hide on it? Are the 33,000 emails that Clinton deleted from her private server still lurking in an abandoned data center somewhere in the Donbas region?
• Larry Fink’s childhood sled
For anyone who has yet to reach the end of Orson Welles’s 1941 classic Citizen Kane, has never heard anything about the movie’s ending and is still expecting to be surprised by it, sorry in advance for the spoiler.
It’s no secret that BlackRock, the world’s largest investment asset manager, has become very interested recently in Ukraine, where it hopes to help engineer the Great Reset by rebuilding the country’s financial industry.
BlackRock also maintains close ties to the Biden administration. In fact, board chairman Thomas Donilon, who served as national security adviser during the Obama administration, has made regular visits to the Biden White House.
And Brian Deese, who until recently was the director of Biden’s National Economic Council, was formerly BlackRock’s global head of sustainable investing—also known as ESG.
So perhaps BlackRock, like the FBI and others, had more than a minor role in helping to install Biden as president with the intention of advancing a grand strategy for Ukraine even before Russia’s 2022 incursion.
Since we know that the company’s controversial woke-investing practices have little to do with turning a profit for its investors, there must be some other reason BlackRock CEO Larry Fink has such an interest in that part of the world.
The answer: He is searching for his lost childhood sled and believes it may be traced to somewhere in the Mariinsky Palace, where he must rescue it before the Wagner Group leaves it in rubble.
