Trump to Argue Colorado Supreme Court Devised Removal from Primary Ballot

(Joe Mueller, The Center Square) – Lawyers for former President Donald Trump will argue the Colorado Supreme Court violated state regulations when it ruled he wasn’t eligible for the March Republican presidential primary ballot, according to a brief filed with the U.S. Supreme Court.

The legal team also repeated past arguments challenging the use of the U.S. Constitution’s 14th amendment as the grounds for removing him from the ballot. They contend the president is not an “officer of the United States” and didn’t “engage in insurrection.” They also argue Section 3 of the 14th amendment can only be enforced by the U.S. Congress and can’t be used to deny Trump access to the ballot.

The nation’s highest court agreed to hear an appeal of the state court earlier this month and scheduled oral arguments for Feb. 8. The U.S. Supreme Court’s decision to hear the case triggered a stipulation in the Colorado Supreme Court’s ruling that Trump be placed on the March 2024 presidential primary ballot.

If the U.S. Supreme Court rules in favor of the lower court, all votes for Trump wouldn’t be counted, according to the Colorado Secretary of State.

In a 50-page brief filed on Thursday, Trump’s legal team referred to the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Bush v. Gore after the 2000 presidential election. That decision found state legislatures have the authority to regulate federal elections, not the courts.

“The Colorado legislature allows the state judiciary to intervene in ballot disputes only when a person ‘charged with a duty’ under the Colorado Election Code ‘has committed or is about to commit a breach or neglect of duty or other wrongful act,’” the brief states. “Secretary (of State Jenna) Griswold will not breach or neglect any ‘duty’ or commit a ‘wrongful act’ under the 14th Amendment by listing President Trump on the ballot, because Section 3 merely bars individuals from holding office, not from seeking or winning election to office.”

Trump’s lawyers argue the “Colorado Supreme Court tried to concoct a ‘wrongful act’” by claiming Griswold would violate state election law.

“That is not even remotely what the statute says, and the Court should reverse on this ground,” the lawyers wrote.

The regulation “requires only that participating political parties have at least one ‘qualified candidate’” according to the brief.

Dozens of “friend of the court” or amicus briefs are being filed with the U.S. Supreme Court on the case. Griswold plans to enter a brief before the Jan. 31 deadline.

“Donald Trump continues to argue that he shouldn’t face consequences for his involvement in the Jan. 6 insurrection at the U.S. Capitol,” Griswold said in a statement on Thursday. “The presidency should not be a get-out-of-jail-free card for engaging in insurrection. The American people deserve leaders who support and respect the language of the Constitution. I will be filing my office’s brief in response to Trump’s groundless contentions, and I look forward to oral arguments before the Supreme Court next month.”

MURDOCK: Importing New Dems Costs U.S. Taxpayers $182B in 2023

(Deroy Murdock, Headline USA) President Joe Biden has transformed America’s southern border into a humanitarian catastrophe and a national security nightmare. This bloody, deadly mess is a clear and present danger to this republic.

But this also is a massive fiscal threat. Biden’s obliteration of the border is evaporating federal, state and local coffers.

Precise figures on anything illegal are, by definition, elusive. Nonetheless, the Federation for American Immigration Reform’s report, The Fiscal Burden of Illegal Immigration on United States Taxpayers 2023, estimates that taxpayers bleed $182.1 billion in annual benefits to illegal aliens.

This includes $66.4 billion in federal spending and another $115.7 billion in state and local outlays to those who have broken into America.

“No sweat!” illegal-alien apologists argue. “They work hard, pay taxes and pull their own weight.”

If only.

“Taxes paid by illegal aliens only cover around 17.2% of the costs they create for American citizens,” FAIR calculates. This includes $16.2 billion in federal taxes and $15.2 billion in state and local levies. These $31.4 billion still stick U.S. citizens with 82.8% of the illegals’ $150.7 billion annual tab.

Extrapolating this figure suggests that—since Biden took control three years ago this Jan. 20—these foreign invaders have siphoned some $452 billion from the U.S. Treasury, state houses and city halls across America.

Specifically:

Federal

  • Welfare – $11.6 billion
  • Medical – $23.1 billion
  • Law enforcement/justice – $25.1 billion
  • Education – $6.6 billion

State and local

  • Welfare – $2 billion
  • Medical – $18.6 billion
  • Law enforcement/justice – $21.8 billion
  • Education – $73.3 billion

Every penny of this largesse is avoidable.

Sealing the southern frontier and requiring that immigrants present visas would halt this relentless onslaught.

The fact that illegal-alien encounters have soared 336% under Biden vs. President Donald J. Trump pins this evil on No-Borders Biden and the DEI Democrats.

“The impact of these policies is causing social upheaval, setting states against other states, big cities against surrounding communities, overwhelming school districts and social service providers, as economic migrants from all across the globe pour across our borders,” said FAIR President Dan Stein.

This foreign menace plagues U.S. cities and states:

  • Due to the 37,000 illegals who have swamped Denver since December, Democrat Mayor Mike Johnston said Wednesday that his city faces “a fiscal crisis unlike anything we have seen in the last 25 years.” He expects illegals to cost Denver $180 million this year. Denver Health hospital is in critical condition because 8,000 illegals have paid nothing for their 20,000 visits.
  • Texas’s Republican Gov. Greg Abbott told Fox Business Network anchor Stuart Varney on Jan. 4: “Since Joe Biden has taken office, Texas taxpayers have borne the brunt of about $10 billion in costs for Texas to do the federal government’s job to try to secure the border.”
  • Some 160,000 illegals have flooded New York City since spring 2022. So, Democrat Mayor Eric Adams announced plans to slash spending across the board 5% for three years each. This 15% reduction in police, fire, sanitation, education and all else totaled $12.25 billion, to keep illegals clothed, fed, housed and taught. Hence, Adams cancelled five Police Academy rookie classes.

Unexpectedly higher revenues let Adams pare these cuts to $10.6 billion. Regardless, New York’s citizens anticipate deadlier streets, brighter infernos, dirtier sidewalks and dimmer students.

Adams detonated a rage bomb on Jan. 9 when he bussed 1,900 illegal “guests” from a rain-soaked tent city to Brooklyn’s James Madison High School and banished its children to Zoom classes. This betrayal infuriated Madison’s largely black, Hispanic, Democratic parents

Biden’s border-killing policies have lured 8.47 million illegal aliens into the hands of sadistic cartels and rape-happy human smugglers. He shines a green light for foreign criminals, spies and terrorists.

On Biden’s watch, 312 of the latter have been nabbed at the border, versus 11 under Trump—up 2,736%. How many have slipped through? Who knows?

Meanwhile, Joe Biden offers U.S. taxpayers two words: Drop dead.

Deroy Murdock is a Manhattan-based Fox News Contributor.

No Labels Files DOJ Complaint Alleging ‘Conspiracy to Subvert Voting Rights’

(Molly Bruns, Headline USA) The nonprofit behind the bipartisan third-party No Labels movement filed a complaint with the Department of Justice claiming that outside organizations harassed and intimidated their staff as they petitioned states to recognize them in the 2024 presidential election, Spectrum News NY1 reported.

The bipartisan group’s current goal is to lay the groundwork for a third nominee by gaining ballot access in as many states as possible. They currently have ballot lines in 14 states, with the intent to win 13 more before November.

Political players on both sides of the aisle take issue with No Label’s cause, and, according to the group, there is a racketeering conspiracy in the works against them.

The eight-page complaint to the DOJ provided audio recordings of threats from a meeting of co-conspirators who promised to dissuade and even blackmail potential candidates from running on a No Labels ticket if they found “one fingernail clipping of a skeleton.”

The group also claimed that Holly Page, co-founder of the group, was promised “she would never work in Democratic politics again,” and would “get it with both barrels” by an unnamed representative of the Lincoln Project, a NeverTrump group that fears any third-party presence in the race will draw votes away from the Democrat nominee.

The group also asked the DOJ to investigate the possibilities of extortion, oppression and interference or attempting to interfere an individual’s right to vote.

“The right to obtain a ballot line is just as protected by the U.S. Constitution as the right to register to vote,” said the group’s chief strategist, Ryan Clancy, said. “But powerful forces in Washington clearly don’t respect this right and have made it their mission to prevent No Labels access to the ballot by any means necessary.”

Despite the possible conspiracy, over one million voters signed petitions to get the No Labels candidate in their state.

The group plans to announce their nominee no later than April if they manage to forge ballot lines in more states.

They expressed interest in current presidential candidate Nikki Haley, “if she declares any interest.” The group also discussed the possibility of bringing in former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie following his failed run in the Republican primary.

Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., has likewise been floated as a strong possibility on a coalition ticket. Several recently retired RINO leaders, including former Maryland Gov. Larry Hogan, former North Carolina Gov. Pat McCrory and former Utah Sen. Mitt Romney round out the field of possibilities.

Also lending cachet to the movement is longtime Sen. Joe Lieberman of Connecticut, who ran as Al Gore’s vice presidential running mate on the Democratic ticket in 2000 before later becoming an independent.

Leftist operatives quickly went on the attack, suggesting that the No Labels complaint might be over the target.

Lawfare ringleader Marc Elias, the architect of the notorious Steele dossier, said the letter was “so stupid, I wonder if they had a Trump lawyer write it.”

Indiana’s Primary Sees Robust Competition as Conservatives Duke It Out

(Headline USA) In a state as solidly Republican as Indiana, the May primary is the real competition.

Four months out, five candidates are still jockeying for the GOP gubernatorial nomination in an unusually crowded field. Annual campaign finance reports filed Wednesday reflect a multimillion-dollar race that has become a competition of who can out-conservative the others for primary votes in a state with historically low turnout.

Two-term Gov. Eric Holcomb, a Republican, cannot run again because of term limits. Indiana’s primary is May 7.

“In Indiana, we are not used to seeing competitive primaries,” said Gregory Shufeldt, a professor of political science at the University of Indianapolis.

Shufeldt said the crowded field could be a result of interest in state government roles, rather than a career in a Congress bogged with gridlock in the recent years.

First-term U.S. Sen. Mike Braun’s decision to join the gubernatorial race opened up his seat, and many expect U.S. Rep Jim Banks, a Republican, to easily fill it.

Braun’s close allegiance to former President Donald Trump helped propel his Senate win in 2018 and has given him statewide name recognition. Braun ended 2023 with a healthy $4 million in the bank, according to finance reports, and has Trump’s endorsement again this year.

Touting similar name recognition is Lt. Gov. Suzanne Crouch, whose ambitious plan to eliminate the state income tax is one of the most divisive subjects in the race so far. “Axe the Tax” has been decried by the other candidates to some degree as unrealistic and untimely.

Holcomb has not endorsed a successor, including Crouch. And Crouch has rarely evoked Holcomb, whose popularity took a hit over some COVID-19 restrictions such as a statewide mask mandate. Crouch has, rather, relied on her record of statewide and county service and pitched a focus on mental health and addiction services.

Her campaign reported ending 2023 with $3.7 million in the bank.

Shufeldt called Crouch’s politics “pragmatic” conservatism, similar to Indiana’s past two governors.

“It’s a contest between conservative, very conservative and extremely conservative,” he said of the race.

Curtis Hill, the embattled former attorney general, has appealed to the Trump conservative base with his campaign rhetoric.

Hill lost the Republican nomination for reelection in 2020 following allegations that he drunkenly groped four women during a party. He denied the accusations, but the Indiana Supreme Court temporarily suspended his license after finding “by clear and convincing evidence that [Hill] committed the criminal act of battery” against three female legislative staffers and a state lawmaker.

He and Braun have been the most vocal on topics pertaining to issues contested in national elections, such as immigration and border security.

Shufeldt said Holcomb and former Gov. Mitchell Daniels, who served two terms before former Vice President Mike Pence, generally avoided stepping into “cultural issues” and focused more on school vouchers and economic development.

“I think a Braun or Hill governorship probably puts cultural issues more front and center,” he said.

However, Hill ended the year millions of dollars behind the competition, reporting about $123,000 in cash on hand.

The other Republican candidates, Brad Chambers and Eric Doden, have similar resumes. Both have led the Indiana Economic Development Corporation, a quasi-governmental agency, and have focused their campaigning on Indiana’s economic future.

Doden’s “Main Street Initiative”—focused on reviving and retaining the economy of Indiana’s small towns—is the backbone of his campaign.

Chambers has repeatedly touted Indiana’s economic growth during his recent time as secretary of commerce.

Both have directed messaging toward supporting law enforcement.

Chambers, who entered the race last of the bunch in August, raised over $8.5 million in 2023 and contributed $5 million himself. He ended the year with $2.91 million in the bank, according to records.

Doden threw his name in the ring as early as 2021 and reported over $1 million in cash on hand at the end of 2023. His campaign said he has raised $5 million to date.

While the race is expected to be the most expensive in Indiana history for the office, its unlikely to boost turnout, said Laura Wilson, professor of political science at the University of Indianapolis.

Indiana historically has low voter turnout; 24% of those registered voted in the 2020 primary. Fundraising might matter the most to Doden and Chambers, who lack the name recognition of the other candidates.

On the Democratic side of the ballot, former Indiana schools Superintendent Jennifer McCormick is running a longshot bid to flip the state’s top office. McCormick split from the GOP over education policy and later changed her party affiliation after her term ended in early 2021. Libertarian Donald Rainwater and Republican Jamie Reitenour are also campaigning for the office.

Wilson expected the race to soon turn to more political topics including abortion and support for Trump.

“For some voters, I think, this race unfortunately is going to be somewhat of an afterthought because the focus nationally is going to be so heavy on the presidential,” Wilson said.

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

Go Woke, Go Broke? Sports Illustrated Fires Half Its Staff over Finances

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) Sports Illustrated has laid off nearly half of its staff and plans to terminate more individuals amid an ongoing financial dispute between the media publisher and owner, both of which had an arrangement for the licensing of the outlet. 

Reportedly, Sports Illustrated’s parent company, Authentic Brands Groups, revoked the licensing agreement with The Arena Group following the latter’s failure to pay its quarterly payment, totaling $15 million per year ($3.75 million per quarter).

The mass layoffs were initially announced in an internal email. “As a result of this license revocation, we will be laying off staff that work on the SI brand,” the email said, according to Fox Business. 

The magazine’s union, Sports Illustrated Union, and the NewsGuild of New York confirmed the mass layoffs in a Twitter statement. 

“This is another difficult day in what has been a difficult four years for Sports Illustrated under Arena Group (previously The Maven) stewardship. We are calling on ABG to ensure the continued publication of SI and allow it to serve our audience in the way it has for nearly 70 years,” the Union said. 

Mitch Goldich, NFL editor and unit chair, also confirmed the layoffs in the same statement. “We have fought together as a union to maintain the standard of this storied publication that we love, and to make sure our workers are treated fairly for the value they bring to this company. It is a fight we will continue,” he said. 

Critics on Twitter reacted to the news by blasting Sports Illustrated, formerly hailed as a beacon for sports journalism, over what many have described as pandering to the left’s ideology on gender and feminism.

“I may buy Sports Illustrated, fire all the woke writers & pledge never again to put ‘chicks’ with d*cks and fat chicks on the SI Swimsuit cover again. Do I have to save all of sports media? I’m fired up,” mocked on Twitter Clay Davis, a Fox Sports Radio host and OutKick founder. 

In May 2023, Sports Illustrated featured transgender singer Kim Petras, known for Unholy, the Sam Smith-owned hit single. “Meet Your Cover Model: Kim Petras,” Sports Illustrated wrote in its headline of the cover story. 

Last year, Authentic Brands Group fired Sports Illustrated‘s CEO after the media was caught allegedly publishing AI-generated content with AI-fabricated profiles.

Twitter users flooded the platform with mocking posts. Scroll down to see some of the reactions:

Concerns Raised over Aging N.H. Voting Equipment Ahead of Primary

(Headline USA) When New Hampshire voters cast their ballots in Tuesday’s first-in-the-nation primary, many will do so using scanners that are at least 15 years old—with some potentially dating back to Bill Clinton’s presidency.

Election experts say the aging AccuVote ballot tabulators in use across roughly half the state’s towns and cities don’t pose additional security risks. The concern is their age.

With a dwindling supply of replacement parts, breakdowns could create Election Day headaches for local election officials, who might be forced to count ballots by hand—a process that could delay reporting their results.

That, in turn, could open the door to chain-of-custody concerns as have been the case in recent elections where suspicious delays ultimately appeared to reverse the election-night outcome and steal the election from President Donald Trump and other MAGA-backed candidates.

Franklin, a small city about 20 miles north of the state capital, has no wiggle room if something goes awry with its scanners.

“We have three machines and three polling places. That’s it, no backup,” said Olivia Zink, a member of the Franklin City Council who also is executive director of the voter advocacy group Coalition for Open Democracy. “If one goes down, we hand count.”

Zink, who will be working at her local polling place Tuesday, said she is less worried about hand counting even if turnout is robust among the 4,500 registered voters because the ballot contains only the presidential primary.

She urged everyone to be patient if results are delayed. One potential glitch: If it’s snowy or rainy, damp ballots can mess up a ballot scanner.

“If it’s a sunny, beautiful day, we’re in great shape,” Zink said.

Reducing the chances of a major disruption is the ballot itself, with just a single race and a state requirement that vote counting continue uninterrupted until finished. New Hampshire will hold primaries for state and local races later in the year.

All New Hampshire voters mark their ballot by hand, but how those ballots are counted depends on the city or town. Just under half opt to hand count and have done so for years, but those are among the least populated in the state.

The most populous towns and cities use machine tabulators, so most ballots cast in the state are counted electronically using the AccuVote scanners.

The same type of ballot scanners are used by local voting jurisdictions in five other states, according to Verified Voting, a nonpartisan group that tracks U.S. voting equipment.

“You could say it’s primitive technology. You could say it’s simple and reliable technology. Both of those things can be true,” said Mark Lindeman, the group’s policy and strategy director.

He said New Hampshire’s tabulators have been kept in good condition and that the biggest challenge for election officials is finding replacement parts. He sees the worst-case scenario as local election officials having to resort to hand counting because a tabulator has failed and they don’t have access to a backup.

“As worst cases go, that’s a pretty good one,” Lindeman said. “The ballots are safe. This will not prevent New Hampshire voters from voting or prevent New Hampshire voters from having their votes counted.”

Even so, any problems with voting machines or ballot counting devices provide an opening for those who want to cast doubt on the outcome.

“If there are major failures and results come really late, and if there is not information ahead of time to the public that we might be hand-counting and what that involves—in a worst-case scenario the vacuum that leaves could allow folks to come forward with conspiracy theories and question what the results are,” said McKenzie St. Germain with the voter advocacy group America Votes NH.

In Derry, south of Manchester, Town Clerk Tina Guilford tested her eight tabulators this week to ensure they were working properly and counting ballots correctly. It’s a process being repeated across the state as local election officials prepare for the primary.

Derry’s tabulators are roughly turn-of-the-century technology—each about 20 to 22 years old, Guilford said. The town agreed to buy replacements that officials hope will be in place by March when new tabulators will be certified for use in the state.

Derry, with its nearly 20,000 registered voters, doesn’t need all eight AccuVote scanners running at the same time, so they have options if one were to be taken out of service, Guilford said. It has happened before, when hand sanitizer gummed up a machine in 2020 during the pandemic.

“I don’t foresee any issues,” she said.

Secretary of State David Scanlan, New Hampshire’s top election official, said he has been encouraging local officials to make sure they have enough staff to handle any hand counting that may be necessary.

It’s expected that every jurisdiction will have to count some ballots by hand given Biden’s decision to skip the state’s primary in favor of a revamped Democratic schedule that elevated South Carolina over Iowa and New Hampshire. That has prompted a write-in campaign for him, and any ballots with write-in candidates will have to be tallied by hand.

In recent years, hand counting has gained favor among those questioning the 2020 election as they seek to ban voting machines and electronic tabulators. While hand counting is used in some parts of the country, it usually occurs in small jurisdictions where the process is manageable.

Last year, New Hampshire lawmakers rejected a proposal that would have required all votes to be counted by hand.

Experts say not only are machines faster, but studies have shown they are more accurate. Many election officials do rely on some measure of hand counting as part of their post-election process to verify that the machines worked correctly.

Scanlan said he has been encouraging voters to understand that it’s not unusual for some machines to have problems and stressed that election officials have plans to deal with it, even if it means a delay in releasing results.

“That just happens in any election,” he said. “I would expect that this election is going to be no different than any other election we’ve conducted in the past.”

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

Anti-Trump DA, Lover Face Scathing Probe from Fulton County Commissioner

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) Fulton County Commissioner Bob Ellis launched Friday an investigation concerning District Attorney Fani Willis‘ potential misuse of taxpayer funds. 

Willis, the infamous state prosecutor leading a RICO case against former President Donald Trump, faces allegations that she took private flights with her subordinate, Special Prosecutor Nathan Wade. Additionally, reports indicate that Willis had an affair with the individual, privately flew with him and failed to disclose this connection to the judge overseeing the Trump case. 

In an interview with the Daily Caller, Ellis insisted that Fulton County residents “deserve clear and truthful answers” from Willis, whom he criticized as “relatively obstinate.” While Ellis acknowledged that court proceedings would determine any conflicts or ethical issues, he added that “the average person likely concludes that something isn’t right with all of this.” 

Ellis conveyed his concerns to Willis through a scathing letter, highlighting reports that she hired Nathan Wade despite his limited experience in RICO cases. He also pointed out instances of Willis privately benefiting from the special prosecutor’s taxpayer-funded contract during joint leisure travel.

“I must reasonably inquire about allegations contained in a recent court filing asserting that you misused county funds and accepted valuable gifts and personal benefits from a contractor/recipient of county funds,” Ellis wrote. 

Ellis decried ethical issues arising from the alleged relationship between Willis and Nathan Wade, emphasizing the failure to properly disclose such a relationship to Trump and other co-defendants. 

Willis has until Feb. 2, 2024, to submit relevant documents, including invoices, expenses, costs, and fees related to the payment of special prosecutors. Ellis also requested information on the laws and rules applicable to the hiring of special prosecutors in her office. 

According to the Washington Examiner, a bank record discovered by Nathan Wade’s wife, Joycelyn Wade, seemed to confirm a relationship between Willis and the special prosecutor, raising ethical questions about the duo’s role in the case against Trump. 

The disturbing allegations, directly impacting the ethical considerations of the Trump criminal case, first surfaced in a motion filed by Michael Roman, one of the 18 co-defendants in the RICO case.

Although Roman has not specified the source of his information, a Thursday motion implies that the accusations originate from the divorce battle between Nathan Wade and his wife, Joycelyn Wade. 

Joycelyn Wade is seeking financial support in the divorce proceedings involving her husband, who gained national attention for his role in prosecuting Trump. Reportedly, she subpoenaed Willis to testify in the divorce hearing. 

However, in a Thursday motion, Willis accused Joycelyn Wade of attempting to interfere in the Trump 2020 election case by allegedly conspiring with Roman to “annoy, embarrass, and oppress” her.  

Willis requested the judge to quash the subpoena, alleging that Joycelyn Wade cheated on Nathan Wade with an alleged friend. Willis is also seeking compensation for her attorney’s fees and expenses. 

WEF Suggests ‘Exclusion Lists’ to Demonetize ‘Disinformation’ Sources

(Dmytro “Henry” Aleksandrov, Headline USA) At the World Economic Forum’s Davos conference on Jan. 18, 2024, a chief at an international nonprofit providing “support” to news organizations shared insights on how to crush so-called “bad” sources of information, obviously implying that it is conservative news sources that lie to the public instead of leftist news sources.

During the “Defending Truth” panel, Internews President and CEO Jeanne Bourgault outlined a strategy for demonetizing sources of “inaccurate content” by crafting blacklists to guide advertisers on where to spend their money

Among the organizations that have put this demonetization method into practice were the Global Disinformation Index (GDI) and Check My Ads which started to consistently focus their efforts on diminishing ad revenue for conservative sources, according to the Daily Caller.

“Disinformation makes money and we need to follow that money and we need to work with, in particular, the global advertising industry. A lot of those dollars go to pretty bad content. So you can work really hard on exclusion lists or inclusion lists just to really try to… focus their ad dollars toward the good news and information. The accurate and relevant news and information,” Bourgault said.

GDI is a nonprofit that is based in the United Kingdom and has confidential “exclusion lists” it sells to online advertising firms in order to demonetize content, the Caller reported.

Even though the blacklists themselves are private, the organization regularly publicizes its “Disinformation Risk Assessment” which gives conservative news outlets high-risk scores and liberal news outlets such as the New York Times low-risk scores. Conservative-in-name-only outlets that constantly bash Donald Trump, for instance, like the New York Post, also receive high-risk scores.

Check My Ads is another organization that works to demonetize conservative news outlets such as Human Events and The Post Millennial and right-wing media personalities like Dan Bongino and Charlie Kirk.

Chinese Lab Mapped COVID-19 Weeks Before CCP Notified the World

(Dmytro “Henry” Aleksandrov, Headline USA) It was revealed that researchers in China identified and mapped the COVID-19 virus weeks before the communist state informed the world about the news.

The recently discovered information raised serious concerns about the country’s transparency regarding the initial outbreak of the virus, according to Blaze Media.

A researcher from China uploaded a nearly complete sequence of the COVID-19 virus structure to the U.S. National Institute of Health’s (NIH) database on Dec. 28, 2019 — two weeks before China officially notified the world about the virus — according to the documents that were obtained by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

The Chinese researcher who has been identified as Dr. Lili Ren was working as a virologist at the Institute of Pathogen Biology of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences in Beijing, an organization that has ties to the Chinese Communist Party and People’s Liberation Army.

“[Ren is a] current subgrantee of the non-profit EcoHealth Alliance on the same National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease (NIAID) grant as the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV),” the Republican lawmakers added.

When Ren tried to publish the genetic sequence of the SARS-CoV-2 virus to GenBank — a comprehensive database of genetic sequences that is publicly available and operated by the NIH — GenBank notified Ren three days later via email that her submission was incomplete and that she needed to provide additional annotations.

Eventually, Ren’s genetic sequencing was deleted from GenBank’s processing queue on Jan. 16, 2020, even though a different team of Chinese researchers was allowed to submit a nearly identical genetic sequence to GenBank that was published on Jan. 12, 2020, according to a letter that was sent to the House Energy and Commerce Committee leaders from Melanie Anne Egorin – a senior official at the HHS.

The World Health Organization was notified by China about the COVID-19 sequence only on Jan. 12, 2020.

Interestingly enough, the Biden administration, the NIH and the HHS have “obstructed and delayed Congressional investigations into the origins of SARS-CoV-2” and “refused to produce this sequence for over seven months,” Republicans claimed.

The House Energy and Commerce Committee received the sequence only after it had threatened subpoenas.

“This significant discovery further underscores why we cannot trust any of the so-called ‘facts’ or data provided by the CCP and calls into serious question the legitimacy of any scientific theories based on such information,” Committee Chair Reps. Cathy McMorris Rodgers, R-Wash., Brett Guthrie, R-Ky., and Morgan Griffith, R-Va., said.

Nikki Haley Rejects Non-Existent VP Offer: ‘Off the Table’

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) Former U.N. Ambassador and Republican presidential hopeful Nikki Haley dismissed the notion of joining Donald Trump’s vice-presidential ticket in 2024, even if he secures the GOP nomination for president.

As reported by Politico, during a Friday campaign event in New Hampshire, a seemingly agitated Haley asserted, “I’ve said from the very beginning: I don’t play for second. I don’t want to be anybody’s vice president. That is off the table.” 

Haley has consistently stated her refusal to serve as Trump’s vice president in a hypothetical second term. But while Trump has hinted that he already knows his pick, a Haley offer is unlikely, though not impossible, based on early indications. 

Close allies of Trump, such as his son Don Trump Jr. and Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, vehemently rejected media assertions that Haley should be Trump’s running mate. 

The push against Haley originates from her hawkish focus on foreign policy, a stark contrast to Trump’s America First policies and strong opposition to military conflicts. 

In a December interview, Trump Jr. expressed his strong opposition to Haley potentially joining the Trump ticket. “I wouldn’t have her and I would go to great lengths to make sure that that doesn’t happen,” he told Newsmax host Eric Bolling.

“Nikki Haley wants never-ending wars. She’s a puppet of the establishment in Washington, DC. She’s the new favorite candidate of the billionaire class because they want control,” he added.

Trump Jr. has recently voiced support for Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (also seeking the GOP nomination for president), Sen. J.D. Vance or former Fox News host Tucker Carlson joining the ticket.

Also opposing Haley is Greene, who, in a Dec. 12 tweet, warned of chaos if Trump were to choose Haley as his running mate.

“MAGA would revolt if Nikki Haley were to even be given an internship in Trump’s next administration,” Greene declared. “She represents the neocon establishment America last wing of the Republican Party that we are absolutely done with. Also, she lied and said she would not run against Trump.”

Contrastingly, a Wednesday NBC News report highlighted that Trump is potentially considering Rep. Elise Stefanik, R-N.Y., as his running mate. On a Jan. 11 Fox News town hall, Trump said he already knew who his running mate is “gonna be” but refused to name the individual.