New Biden Scandal Emerges: Millions in Unpaid Alimony

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) Hunter Biden finds himself entangled in a covert multi-million dollar civil case concerning unpaid alimony owed to his ex-wife, Kathleen Buhle, from whom he parted ways in 2017. 

This alimony dispute, recently unveiled by Axios, coincides with reports suggesting that Buhle is poised to testify regarding Hunter Biden’s substance abuse and extravagant lifestyle in separate trials concerning alleged false statements on a gun purchase form and his failure to meet federal tax obligations.

The trial for the gun purchase is slated to commence on Monday, followed by the tax case on Sept. 5. The criminal trials, in addition to the alimony battle, add yet another layer of scandal to President Joe Biden’s re-election efforts. 

As Axios reports, a D.C. judge ruled that Hunter Biden owed Buhle over $1.7 million in overdue spousal support, legal fees and accumulated interest since their 2017 divorce—mere years before Hunter Biden entered a relationship with his sister-in-law, Hallie Biden. 

This ruling stemmed from a civil suit initiated by Buhle against the president’s son in 2019, shortly after his remarriage to Melissa Cohen Biden. 

The divorce settlement mandated Hunter Biden to remit $37,000 monthly to his former spouse, in addition to 50% of any earnings surpassing $875,000 annually. 

In a pattern reminiscent of his tax obligations, Hunter Biden failed to fulfill his spousal support commitments for 2017 and 2018, despite earning $2.4 million and $2.1 million, respectively, according to Axios. 

Consequently, Hunter Biden is accountable to Buhle for $1.1 million, plus a 6% interest increment for the 2017 and 2018 alimony installments. 

Axios reported that Hunter Biden ceased alimony payments following Buhle’s initiation of legal proceedings against him in June 2019. 

After Buhle’s legal team endeavored to hold Hunter Biden in contempt for failing to remit $259,000 plus interest by an April 2020 deadline, Hunter Biden’s legal representatives requested the judge to await third-party intervention to mitigate potential embarrassment. 

In July 2020, Hunter’s lawyer, Sarah Mancinelli, asserted, “It is likely hoped that there will be some financial intervention, funded by some third-party, to help Mr. Biden with these obligations, in an effort to avoid the anticipated embarrassment to his father’s presidential campaign.” 

She firmly concluded, “There will be no intervention satisfying Mr. Biden’s obligations.” 

Some Democrats Running Away from Biden Border Policies

(Bethany Blankley, The Center Square) – Earlier this month, news reports suggested Democrats were preparing to launch an “aggressive new immigration strategy” ahead of the election, The Center Square reported.

Included in the strategy was an attempt to pass a so-called bipartisan border security bill advanced last week by Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-New York, which failed.

Within a few months of the November election, some Democrats are distancing themselves from President Joe Biden’s border policies even as he is expected to advance an executive action next month on the border.

Six Senate Democrats and independents joined Republicans to block the so-called Senate border security bill last week in a 50-43 vote. The vote was procedural to allow the bill to be heard.

Joining Republicans opposing the motion were Democratic Sens. Corey Booker (NJ); Alex Padilla and Laphonza Butler (Calif.); Ed Markey (Mass.); and independent Sens. Kyrsten Sinema (Ariz.), and Bernie Sanders (Vermont). Three Democrats also didn’t vote: Sens. Joe Manchin (W.V.); Bob Menendez (NJ); and Elizabeth Warren (MA).

Two of the bill’s sponsors who previously championed it, Sens. James Lankford (Okla.), and Sinema, voted against the motion.

Sinema said both sides were blaming each other and playing “political theater.” When they first tried to bring the bill up for consideration and her Republican colleagues opposed it, Sinema said they were “all talk and no action.” After Schumer tried to get the measure through, she said her Democratic colleagues chose “more political theater instead of real efforts to solve this crisis. All talk and no action goes both ways.” The failed vote was a “show vote,” she said, “to point the finger back at the other party.”

Schumer also blamed Republicans for the border crisis, saying on X, “It’s been 106 days since Donald Trump and the Republicans blocked the strongest, most comprehensive border security bill in a generation. And they still don’t have any plan except exploiting the border for Trump’s political gain.”

President Joe Biden said, “Congressional Republicans do not care about securing the border or fixing America’s broken immigration system. If they did, they would have voted for the toughest border enforcement in history,” referring to the Senate bill.

Despite the claims made by the president, Lankford, Sinema, and many others, the Senate bill largely does the opposite of what they claim, The Center Square reported. The bill wouldn’t cap illegal border entries to 5,000 a day; would codify and expand the Biden administration policies over which at least 25 state attorneys general have sued; amend federal law to expand illegal entry, which incentivizes “fraud families,” human smuggling and other crimes, officials have explained. Texas officials have also pointed to how it would codify mass migration and nullify state sovereignty.

With more than 11 million border crossers and escalating crime associated with them rising since January 2021, the border crisis remains one of the top issues for voters ahead of the November election.

Poll after poll shows it’s a top concern among voters, “on which the Democrats try hardest to distance themselves from their own party,” and “a major Biden weakness,” The New York Times reports. Still, the president is preparing to issue executive action on the border, which he could sign as early as next month, Politico reported.

Several reports also have pointed to some Senate Democrats running for reelection who are distancing themselves from Biden’s border policies.

In one race, U.S. Sen. Jacky Rosen, D-Nevada, says in a political ad that she promised “to do what is right for Nevada, not my party leaders. I won’t walk the party line and I never have.” She cites examples of standing up to the Democratic Party “to support police officers and get more funding for border security.”

U.S. Sen. Jon Tester, D-Montana, distances him from Biden in a political ad, saying, “Jon Tester worked with Republicans, fighting to shut down the border … and he fought to stop President Biden from letting migrants stay in America.”

Senate Republicans have warned about increased terrorist threats due to Biden administration policies, arguing they hope voters will hold their Democratic colleagues responsible in November, The Center Square reported.

Texas Gov. Greg Abbott also has placed the blame for the border crisis on the president. “President Biden inherited the most secure border with the lowest illegal immigration since last century,” he maintains. “With the stroke of a pen, he proudly ended those secure border policies and opened the border to more than 11 million illegal immigrants from more than 150 different countries – including known terrorists, murderers, and rapists.”

Instead of securing the border, he is also trying to stop Texas from securing it, Abbott says.

“President Biden attacks Texas for simply doing what Congress compelled him to do,” he said, referring to ongoing lawsuits with the administration over enforcing existing law.

“Texas is building a border wall, installing hundreds of miles of razor wire and buoy barriers, and deploying thousands of Texas National Guard soldiers and Department of Public Safety troopers [to the border]. Operation Lone Star is working, and President Biden would do well to follow our lead, or get out of the way.”

Fact Check: Coast Guard Continue to Interdict, Repatriate Illegal Entry at Sea

(Bethany Blankley, The Center Square) – U.S. Coast Guard crews continue to interdict and repatriate foreign nationals attempting to illegally enter the U.S. off the coast of Florida despite recent claims to the contrary.

After a larger-than-normal surge of illegal activity began around New Year’s Eve 2022 and New Year’s Day 2023, Gov. Ron DeSantis issued a state of emergency and disaster declaration in January 2023 and deployed the National Guard and other state resources to respond. The number of illegal entries by sea significantly dropped, law enforcement officials told The Center Square. Throughout last year, illegal entry attempts by sea remained low.

After political turmoil erupted in Haiti earlier this year, and large numbers of Haitians were expected to arrive by sea off the coast of Florida, Gov. DeSantis again surged state resources to south Florida in March, The Center Square reported. While many feared an influx of Haitians illegally entering by sea would occur, the surge has yet to materialize.

Despite lower interdiction numbers, the U.S. Coast Guard 7th District in South Florida continues to patrol for illegal entry, interdict, and repatriate, regularly publicizing their efforts, The Center Square has reported.

Despite public record of the Coast Guard’s efforts, a Center for Immigration Studies fellow claimed, “The Coast Guard has been given strict orders that if they’re coming out of Haiti, to not interdict, to just follow the boats until they land to make sure they don’t sink … Since the U.S. has decided they’re not going repatriate them back to Haiti, there’s no reason for them to interdict. So it’s going to be a definite [expletive] show.”

The claim had been echoed elsewhere after being fact-checked by multiple sources, including USCG, as false.

“The Coast Guard and its partner agencies remain in an enhanced posture and will continue to rescue and repatriate all migrants on unlawful maritime voyages regardless of nationality,” a spokesperson with the Coast Guard 7th District Public Affairs Team told The Center Square. In fiscal 2024, the Coast Guard has repatriated 118 Haitians and 348 Cubans as of April, according to the latest data shared with The Center Square.

The Coast Guard also continues to regularly publicize its dangerous work of interdiction at sea through social media channels and in news releases.

Several recent interdiction events occurred in May, including two U.S. Coast Guard cutters returning a combined 92 foreign nationals after four separate interdiction efforts in one weekend.

The crew of Coast Guard Cutter Paul Clark repatriated 23 Cubans, after two separate interdictions near Key West and in an area southwest of Marquesas, Florida. After announcing their efforts, Lt. J.G. Nicholas Fujimoto, Coast Guard Seventh District Enforcement Branch, said, “The Coast Guard and its Homeland Security Task Force – Southeast partners will continue to be a presence in the air and on the waters to detect and deter migrants from attempting to unlawfully enter the U.S. by sea. Under Title 8, migrants who arrive without authorization will be repatriated and deemed ineligible for legal immigration pathways.”

On May 22, the same crew repatriated 31 Cubans after multiple interdictions in the Florida Straits, in an area near Key West and southwest of Marquesas, Florida. Other interdictions occurred 23 miles north of Matanzas, Cuba, and 23 miles south of Plantation Key, Florida.

On May 17, the Paul Clark repatriated 26 Cubans after interdiction efforts near the Florida Keys. On May 14, they also repatriated 23 Cubans after two separate interdictions near Key West, Florida, roughly 12 miles south of Marquesas and 26 miles south of Marathon.

“The Coast Guard and our HSTF-SE partners remain in an enhanced posture and maintain a continuous presence in the Windward Passage, Mona Passage, and Florida Straits,” said Lt. Cmdr. Tanner Stiehl, Coast Guard Seventh District Staff Attorney. “Repeated unlawful attempts to emigrate to the U.S. are subject to prosecution in addition to ineligibility for legal migration pathways.”

These interdictions are typical of Coast Guard efforts in the Florida Straits and surrounding areas but significantly less in volume compared to fiscal 2021 and 2022 data.

According to Coast Guard records, from Oct. 1, 2022, to May 17, 2023, Coast Guard crews interdicted or encountered 6,679 Cubans and 4,473 Haitians, previously reported by The Center Square.

Coast Guard crews apprehended 1,527 Haitians in fiscal 2021, 418 in fiscal 2020, 932 in fiscal 2019, 609 in fiscal 2018 and 419 in fiscal 2017.

By comparison, they apprehended 838 Cubans in fiscal 2021, 49 in fiscal 2020, 313 in fiscal 2019, 259 in fiscal 2018, 1,468 in fiscal 2017 and 5,396 in fiscal 2016, The Center Square reported.

These numbers exclude interdiction efforts of Miami Sector Border Patrol agents, also reported on by The Center Square.

Trump Campaign Says it Hauled in Record $34.8M in Donations After Conviction

(Tom Gantert, The Center Square) – Donald Trump’s campaign announced Friday that they raised $34.8 million in small-dollar donations in the aftermath of the former president’s conviction on 34 felonies in a hush money trial.

“Today, the Trump campaign announced a record-shattering small-dollar fundraising haul following the sham Biden Trial verdict totaling $34.8 million – nearly double the biggest day ever recorded for the Trump campaign on the WinRed platform,” the Trump campaign posted on Truth Social, the social media platform Trump created after he was banned from Twitter.

One of Trump’s main fundraising websites crashed within minutes after the verdict was announced on Thursday, an early indication that the conviction may trigger a flood of donations from supporters.

“From just minutes after the sham trial verdict was announced, our digital fundraising system was overwhelmed with support, and despite temporary delays online because of the amount of traffic, President Trump raised $34.8 million dollars from small dollar donors,” according a statement from Trump campaign advisors Chris LaCivita and Susie Wiles. “Not only was the amount historic, but 29.7% of yesterday’s donor’s were brand new donors to the WinRed platform.

“President Trump and our campaign are immensely grateful from this outpouring of support from patriots across our country. President Trump is fighting to save our nation and November 5th is the day Americans will deliver the real verdict.”

Scott Adams, a California man with 1.1 million followers on X, said he donated to the Trump campaign.

“I just donated to Trump,” Adams posted. “The donation page crashed from traffic. This is the hill to die on.”

Those opposed to Trump also said they made donations to President Joe Biden.

Amy Cumpton, a woman from Oklahoma City, posted on X that she donated to the Biden campaign and tagged Team Trump in her reply.

“Me and me husband donated $34 each to Biden tonight in honor of Trumps convictions. We have never made a political donation before,” Cumpton wrote.

Chris Cuomo Ridiculed and Booed for Contradictory Ivermectin Statements

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) Chris Cuomo, the former CNN anchor now a NewsNation host, faced backlash from a crowd as he was being called out for his contradictory stance on Ivermectin, an FDA-approved drug used to treat tropical diseases, including some COVID-19 symptoms. 

Cuomo participated in a Friday live debate on the PBD Podcast Live with host Patrick Bet-David, where he discussed COVID-19, pandemic-era mandates, and other topics with comedian Dave Smith. 

During the debate, the subject of Ivermectin arose, and Cuomo expressed his disapproval of the leftist attacks on podcast host Joe Rogan for his positive comments about the drug as a COVID-19 treatment. 

“There was so much talk that ‘they don’t want you to take Ivermectin;’ ‘Ivermectin is the way to go. Take it; Joe Rogan got better from Ivermectin – and by the way, I don’t like what people did to Joe Rogan,” Cuomo said. 

Smith quickly interjected, “You did it.” 

“No, no. Find the clips,” Cuomo responded. 

“Dude, find the clips,” Smith insisted, likely addressing the podcast’s producer. “You shamed Joe Rogan. You said he was taking horse de-wormer. You and Don Lemon were chuckling about it.” 

Smith reiterated, “Go and find the clip!” 

To Cuomo’s surprise, a recording of Don Lemon and Cuomo discussing Ivermectin was shown. 

“Injecting drugs for animals and horses,” Lemon said in the video. 

“You talk about cancel culture and who to shame. Ivermectin? A de-wormer? Really?” 

Agreeing with Cuomo, Lemon added, “They’re shaming themselves.” 

The debate footage then returned to Cuomo and Smith, with the comedian saying, “You can’t apologize for that! You weren’t being clear… You’re so dishonest!” 

In January 2024, Cuomo revealed in his Substack newsletter that he was suffering from “long COVID,” which refers to long-term effects of a previous COVID-19 infection. 

To help with these effects, Cuomo admitted to using Ivermectin to alleviate symptoms, including “brain fog.” 

“I’ll tell you something else that’s gonna get you a lot of hits,” Cuomo said, during another episode of the PBD Podcast. “I am taking … a regular dose of Ivermectin. Ivermectin was a boogeyman during COVID. That was wrong. We were given bad information about Ivermectin. The real question is, why?” 

Kristi Noem Banned from 20% of Her State By Native Tribes

(Headline USA) South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem is now banned from entering nearly 20% of her state after two more native tribes prohibited her from their territory, the Daily Mail reported.

Noem has been involved in a tribal dispute after she alleged in March that tribal leaders were catering to drug cartels on their reservations.

“We’ve got some tribal leaders that I believe are personally benefiting from the cartels being there, and that’s why they attack me every day,” Noem said at the time.

“But I’m going to fight for the people who actually live in those situations, who call me and text me every day and say, ’Please, dear governor, please come help us in Pine Ridge. We are scared,’” she added.

Shortly afterward, the Oglala, Rosebud, Cheyenne River and Standing Rock Sioux tribes voted to ban Noem from their reservations.

The tensions escalated this month after the release of her memoir, No Going Back, in which she admitted to shooting a 14-month-old hunting dog that misbehaved.

Despite the breakdown in relations with the native tribes, Noem doubled down last week on her earlier comments about tribal leaders’ alleged coordination with drug cartels.

“Tribals leaders should take action to ban the cartels from their lands and accept my offer to help them restore law and order to their communities while protecting their sovereignty,” she tweeted Thursday.

The next day, both the Yankton Sioux and Sisseton–Wahpeton Ovate tribes also voted to ban Noem from their reservations, calling Noem’s comments “injurious.”

In total, there are just three native tribes in the state that have not banned Noem from their territories. 

Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe spokesperson Alli Moran, however, said last month that all of South Dakota’s tribes “share the same sentiments” regarding Noem, specifically that she does not respect or “fully understand” tribal sovereignty.

Trump Defense Lawyer Outlines Multiple Avenues for Overturning Verdict

(Dmytro “Henry” Aleksandrov, Headline USA) Criminal defense attorney Michael O’Mara said on May 31, 2024, that there is a strong chance that Donald Trump’s legal team will overturn the guilty verdict against him in his sham trial in New York.

Trump’s appeal would be based on issues like the unprecedented nature of the case and Judge Juan Merchan not sequestering the jury, CNN senior legal analyst Elie Honig and O’Mara said on CNN News Central, according to the Daily Caller News Foundation.

“So I think the top grounds for appeal is the fact that we had a state court here, a state prosecutor, enforcing in part a federal election crime for the first time actually in U.S. history,” Honig said.

Honig then said that this is a very significant case because it has never happened in the history of the United States.

“We’ve never before seen a case where any state or county level prosecutor has charged, as part of their case, or as a sub-part of their case as a violation of the Federal Election Campaign Act. So this is the first time that’s happened. It was briefed to Judge Merchan. Judge Merchan said, ‘I find it okay, I find it acceptable under New York state law.’ But that‘s going to be issue 1A on the appeal. We don’t know what the answer will be. It’s unprecedented,” Honig said.

Host John Berman then asked O’Mara how “successful” the appeal could be.

“I think there’s a great likelihood, and the reason why is there are a number of issues. Elie brought one up. I have always complained about the way this jury was or was not handled during the trial. I think with the massive focus on this case they should have been sequestered. They certainly should have been sequestered during the deliberations. I think they should have been sequestered for the week before,” he said.

O’Mara then continued explaining what would happen next.

“At this point, they’ll find out who the jurors are. They will backtrack them to every house that they went to, to watch the billboards they saw, and the newsstands that passed by, so I have a real concern that the judge who has to ensure the freedom given by the jury process wasn’t because this jury was not well-protected. And that’s only one of one hundred,” he added.

Univ. of Chicago to Refund Student Tuition for COVID Shutdown in $5M Settlement

(Dmytro “Henry” Aleksandrov, Headline USA) The University of Chicago will pay $4.95 million to settle a class-action lawsuit filed by current and former students seeking refunds on tuition after classes went remote amid the COVID-19 hysteria.

In May 2020, former student Arica Kincheloe filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, saying that students were entitled to partial refunds of tuition because they were forced to study inside their homes, instead of going to classes in-person beginning in the spring quarter of 2020, the Chicago Sun-Times reported.

The lawsuit also claimed that there was a breach of contract and unjust enrichment by the university.

The settlement applies to current and former students enrolled in any of the university’s undergraduate and graduate programs between Jan. 1, 2020, through the end of the spring quarter of 2020. Those students who studied at the university during that time will receive at least $25 from the settlement.

“The university is proud of the rigorous educational experience and support it provided to students when it moved to remote learning for the spring quarter of 2020 in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The university believes plaintiffs’ claims are without merit and looks forward to putting this matter behind us,” the university said.

The court documents said the parties entered a settlement agreement on Nov. 21, 2023. On Dec. 7, 2023, the court granted preliminary approval of the settlement, with the final approval being granted after a hearing on May 23, 2024.

The court documents stated that the settlement agreement “should not in any event be offered or received as evidence of, a presumption, concession or an admission of liability” on the part of the university.

Similar lawsuits have been filed against other schools all around the United States in the wake of the COVID-19 hysteria. Among the universities that faced the legal consequences of shutting down their campuses were DePaul University, George Washington University and Cornell University.

De Niro Loses Leadership Award after Unhinged Courthouse Rant

(Dmytro “Henry” Aleksandrov, Headline USA) The National Association of Broadcasters (NAB) decided to not give an award to actor Robert De Niro after he appeared this week on behalf of the Joe Biden campaign outside the courthouse where one of Donald Trump’s witchhunts was taking place at the time.

De Niro was supposed to receive the NAB Leadership Foundation’s Service to America Award on June 4, 2024, in Washington, D.C., The Hill reported. However, the organization rescinded the award after De Niro exposed his Trump Derangement Syndrome once again outside of the courthouse, a spokesperson for the group said.

“This event is proudly bipartisan, uniting those from across the political spectrum to celebrate the impactful work of local broadcasters and our partners,” the spokesperson said.

The group then added that De Niro’s behavior was not acceptable and that he won’t be attending the event.

“While we strongly support the right of every American to exercise free speech and participate in civic engagement, it is clear that Mr. De Niro’s recent high-profile activities will create a distraction from the philanthropic work that we were hoping to recognize. To maintain the focus on the service of the award winners, Mr. De Niro will no longer be attending the event,” the spokesperson said.

De Niro responded to The Hill regarding the recent news, without mentioning either his previous behavior or that he won’t be getting the award because of it.

“I support the work of the NAB Leadership Foundation and would like to express my appreciation and gratitude for what the Foundation has done and will continue to do for the good of us all, and I wish them well for their continued good work,” De Niro said.

De Niro, who has been a non-stop hater of Trump for many years, initially had been scheduled to receive the NAB award, its highest individual honor, “in recognition of charitable work and public service.”

CIA Sued for Records on Hunter Biden Investigation

(Dmytro “Henry” Aleksandrov, Headline USA) Judicial Watch filed a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit against the Central Intelligence Agency on May 31, 2024, for all agency records related to the Department of Justice or Internal Revenue Services investigations of Hunter Biden.

Additionally, the organization sued the CIA for all records related to efforts to interview lawyer Patrick Kevin Morris, Hunter’s friend, regarding the son of Joe Biden.

Since 2019, Morris loaned Hunter approximately $4.9 million for “personal expenses,” including federal taxes, Judicial Watch reported.

After the CIA failed to respond to two FOIA requests, Judicial Watch filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. 

The first FOIA request, dated March 22, 2024, asked the CIA for “all documents and communications referring or relating to the [DOJ] or [IRS] investigation of Robert Hunter Biden, DPOB: February 4, 1970, Wilmington, [Del.]” and “all documents and communications referring or relating to Attorney Patrick Kevin Morris, including but not limited to requests or efforts to interview Mr. Morris concerning Robert Hunter Biden.”

The second FOIA request, dated March 27, 2024, asked the agency for “all records of communications including, but not limited to, emails and text messages between officials of the CIA and officials of the U.S. Justice Department regarding Hunter Biden and/or Hunter Biden’s lawyer, Kevin Morris.”

House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan and Oversight and Accountability Committee Chairman James Comer revealed in March 2024 that a whistleblower told the committees that the CIA intervened to stop the IRS from interviewing Morris.

This month, Hunter will face two separate criminal trials, with his trial on gun charges in Delaware being scheduled to begin on June 3, 2024, and his trial on various tax charges beginning in California on June 20, 2024.

“It is more than interesting that the CIA is stonewalling Judicial Watch’s Hunter Biden-related request,” Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said.