(Headline USA) Nearly a month out from Election Day, the head of the nation’s cybersecurity agency is forcefully reassuring Americans who have been swept into the chaotic churn of election disinformation and distrust that they will be able to feel confident in the outcome.
State and local election officials have made so much progress in securing voting, ballot-counting and other election infrastructure that the system is more robust than it has ever been, said Jen Easterly, director of the U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency. As a result, she said, there is no way Russia, Iran or any other foreign adversary will be able to alter the results.
“Malicious actors, even if they tried, could not have an impact at scale such that there would be a material effect on the outcome of the election,” Easterly told The Associated Press in an interview Wednesday.
Easterly’s trust in the election process comes as intelligence officials have warned of escalating efforts by foreign adversaries to influence voters, deepen partisan divides and undermine faith in U.S. elections.
Easterly touched on a range of election-related concerns—including misinformation, her agency’s role in interacting with social media companies and ongoing threats to election workers—during the 40-minute interview, which came as mail ballots are being sent out and some states have started early in-person voting.
She also said her agency is in touch with election officials throughout the regions of the Southeast that have been ravaged by Hurricane Helene, and praised those workers for “displaying enormous and admirable resilience” as they try to ensure that voters are able to cast their ballots despite the devastation.
Recognizing that many Americans’ confidence in elections “has been shaken,” Easterly emphasized how prepared election officials are for emergencies, simple mistakes and attacks—and how motivated they are to protect Americans’ votes.
Election officials have worked in recent years to boost cybersecurity defenses around the nation’s voting systems, implementing procedures ranging from access controls to regular testing to identify potential vulnerabilities. Officials also test voting equipment before every election to ensure it works properly.
Easterly pointed to layers of security and transparency—such as the paper record of votes in more than 97% of voting jurisdictions—as protections that will help verify the results.
“Things will go wrong. There could be another storm. There could be a ransomware attack, a distributed denial of service attack,” she said.
“These disruptions will create effects, but they will not impact the ability and the votes being cast or those votes being counted.”
U.S. officials have spent recent months warning through criminal charges, sanctions and public advisories that foreign adversaries are ramping up their efforts to influence voters in the race for the White House.
The Biden administration last month seized more than two dozen Kremlin-run fake websites and charged two Russian state media employees in a scheme to covertly fund right-wing influencers.
Last week, three Iranian operatives were charged with hacking Donald Trump’s campaign.
Intelligence agencies and tech companies have tracked both Russian and Iranian actors using fake websites and social media profiles to spread misinformation, stoke division and potentially sway American voters.
Iran and Russia have sought to influence past U.S. elections through online disinformation and hacking. Easterly noted that China also was “very interested” in influencing the 2024 election.
Beyond the influence campaigns, she said her agency had not detected any activity targeting election systems.
“We have not seen specific cyber activity designed to interfere with actual election infrastructure or processes,” Easterly said.
The prevalence of election misinformation has become a widespread concern. One consequence is what Easterly described as a troubling uptick in physical threats against election officials of both parties and, in some cases, their families.
She called it “corrosive” to democracy and said it’s something the public needs to collectively fight.
“Those election officials, they are not faceless bureaucrats,” Easterly said. “They’re folks we see in the community every single day. And they’re not doing this for pay. They’re not doing it for glory. They are doing it because they believe in the process of democracy.”
Many secretaries of state and some larger local election offices have established specific efforts to combat the misinformation.
U.S. Sen. Mark Warner of Virginia, a Democrat who leads the Senate Intelligence Committee, last week wrote a letter to Easterly that urged the agency to take further steps against election misinformation and disinformation, including coordinating with social media platforms to combat false claims.
In the interview, Easterly acknowledged “a very convoluted, very confusing information environment,” and said her agency works with election officials to promote accurate information. However, she also made it clear that her agency does not monitor social media sites or attempt to moderate their content.
“That is not our role,” she said.
On the heels of Trump’s running mate, Sen. JD Vance, accusing the federal government of “censorship” in Tuesday night’s debate between the vice presidential candidates, Easterly strongly defended her agency, known as CISA.
“CISA does not censor, has never censored,” she said. “And allegations against CISA are riddled with factual inaccuracies.”
CISA, along with other federal agencies, was part of a lawsuit filed by Republican-led states claiming the federal government had applied “unrelenting pressure” to coerce changes in online content on social media platforms.
In a 6-3 vote, the U.S. Supreme Court said the states did not have a legal right to sue.
Easterly encouraged voters who question how elections are run to contact their local election office and even volunteer to serve as poll workers so they understand the process and the safeguards already in place.
She also warned that foreign adversaries almost certainly will seek to take advantage of the vote-counting process after Election Day as a way to undermine confidence in the results. She urged voters to be patient, emphasizing that it could take several days for a presidential winner to be determined.
“We need to come together as Americans to protect and preserve what is most precious,” she said. “And that is the foundation of our democracy—fair, free, safe and secure elections.”
Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press
