Trade War Fears Ease as Trump Pauses Tariffs after Concessions from Canada, Mexico

(Maire Clayton, Headline USA) Major markets pared some losses after President Donald Trump paused his plans for 25% tariffs on goods from Mexico and Canada while starting talks with China on a 10% additional tariff over fentanyl smuggling.

Trump on Saturday ended decades of duty-free trade between the U.S., Mexico and Canada with a 25% tariff on imported goods from the two countries with a lower 10% tariff on Canadian energy resources.

Trump said he’d keep the tariffs in place until the illegal fentanyl trade subsided. He also added a 10% tariff on imports from China over that country’s role in producing the chemicals needed to make fentanyl, a powerful opioid blamed for the majority of U.S. overdose deaths.

Two days after hitting U.S. neighbors with tariffs, Trump relented after reaching temporary deals with both Mexico and Canada. The deals curbed losses on Wall Street although major indexes ended the day lower.

Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum said Mexico will immediately reinforce the border with 10,000 members of the National Guard in a move to stop drug trafficking, an issue that has been a problem for decades.

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau also promised to reinforce the northern U.S. border in exchange for a pause on tariffs.

“Canada is implementing our $1.3 billion border plan – reinforcing the border with new choppers, technology and personnel, enhanced coordination with our American partners, and increased resources to stop the flow of fentanyl. Nearly 10,000 frontline personnel are and will be working on protecting the border,” Trudeau wrote on X Monday afternoon after a call with Trump. “In addition, Canada is making new commitments to appoint a Fentanyl Czar, we will list cartels as terrorists, ensure 24/7 eyes on the border, launch a Canada-U.S. Joint Strike Force to combat organized crime, fentanyl and money laundering. I have also signed a new intelligence directive on organized crime and fentanyl and we will be backing it with $200 million.”

Trudeau said “proposed tariffs will be paused for at least 30 days while we work together.”

Trump made similar comments on his social media platform, Truth Social.

“Canada has agreed to ensure we have a secure Northern Border, and to finally end the deadly scourge of drugs like Fentanyl that have been pouring into our Country, killing hundreds of thousands of Americans, while destroying their families and communities all across our Country,” Trump wrote.

Mexico, Canada and China are the top three U.S. trading partners responsible for about 40% of U.S. imports in 2024. Some economists predicted the move could push prices higher for U.S. consumers.

The Wall Street Journal’s editorial board called it the “dumbest” trade war in history, a remark that Trump took exception to on Monday, going to so far as to label the outlet “fake news.”

The Wall Street Journal editorial board said the stated goals of Trump’s tariffs – to end fentanyl trafficking – was impossible.

“Mr. Trump’s justification for this economic assault on the neighbors makes no sense … drugs have flowed into the U.S. for decades, and will continue to do so as long as Americans keep using them. Neither country can stop it,” the editorial board wrote.

Trump rejected that appraisal.

“Every single one of those countries is dying to make a deal. You know why, because they’re ripping us off really badly,” Trump said from the Oval Office on Monday afternoon. “And the United States is tired of just being ripped off.”

He said those bad trade deals were responsible for the growing U.S. debt, which stands at $36.22 trillion, according to the U.S. Treasury Department.

“Every country your writing about right now is dying to make a deal because the deals they have right now are so good for – so good for them and so profitable for them,” Trump said. “I think in the end you are going to see either very, very substantial are going to paid by them or they’re going to make some kind of deal.”

The United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement, or USMCA, governs trade between the U.S. and its northern and southern neighbors. It went into force on July 1, 2020, and Trump signed the deal. That agreement continue to allow for duty-free trading between the three countries, a longtime practice that Trump ended Saturday until pausing it Monday.

U.S. goods and services trade with USMCA totaled an estimated $1.8 trillion in 2022. Exports were $789.7 billion and imports were $974.3 billion. The U.S. goods and services trade deficit with USMCA was $184.6 billion in 2022, according to the Office of the United States Trade Representative.

Will Tariffs Cause “Inflation?”

(Mike Maharrey, Money Metals News Service) The Federal Reserve may finally have another scapegoat for the inflation it created – tariffs.

Two Fed officials recently warned about the possible inflationary consequences of President Trump’s aggressive tariff policies.

Of broad-based tariffs, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston President Susan Collins said, “one would expect to have an impact on prices,” and that “you actually would not only see increases in prices of final goods, but also a number of intermediate goods.”

Atlanta Fed President Raphael Bostic sounded a similar warning, saying his business contacts planned to pass tariff costs along to consumers. “The ultimate question about whether that is significantly inflationary depends on exactly how it plays out,” said.

Reuters summed up the situation, reporting, “Economists broadly expect the tariffs will push up inflation and depress growth, but are struggling to measure to what extent, given the fluidity of the situation.”

They’re Both Right and Wrong About Tariffs and Inflation

In one sense, Collins, Bostic, and others are correct.

Tariffs will raise prices.

But they are also wrong.

Tariffs don’t create “inflation” in the true sense of the word.

There is only one thing that causes the general price level to rise – money creation. As economist Milton Friedman once put it, “Inflation is always and everywhere a monetary phenomenon.  It’s always and everywhere a result of too much money.”

The problem is in the imprecise definition of inflation used today.

When people talk about inflation in the mainstream, they generally just mean “rising prices.”  Inflation was defined more precisely as an increase in the amount of money and credit in the economy, or more succinctly, an expansion in the money supply.

Economist Ludwig von Mises defined it this way in his essay “Inflation: An Unworkable Fiscal Policy“:

“Inflation, as this term was always used everywhere and especially in this country, means increasing the quantity of money and bank notes in circulation and the quantity of bank deposits subject to check.”

A 1970s dictionary offered this definition of inflation:

“A sharp increase in the amount of money and credit causing advances in the price level.”

Notice in this definition that rising prices are the result of inflation – not inflation itself.

Economist Henry Hazlitt summed it up this way:

“Inflation is an increase in the quantity of money and credit. Its chief consequence is soaring prices. Therefore inflation … is caused solely by printing more money. For this the government’s monetary policies are entirely responsible.”

Of course, the government and its central bank would prefer you don’t realize they are causing prices to go up. That’s why they have conflated monetary inflation and price inflation. By defining “inflation” as rising prices (the consequences of their monetary inflation), they can blame price increases on other things, including greedy corporations, Vladimir Putin, and now Trump tariffs.

Mises recognized this propaganda ploy decades ago.

“People today use the term `inflation’ to refer to the phenomenon that is an inevitable consequence of inflation, that is the tendency of all prices and wage rates to rise. The result of this deplorable confusion is that there is no term left to signify the cause of this rise in prices and wages. There is no longer any word available to signify the phenomenon that has been, up to now, called inflation… As you cannot talk about something that has no name, you cannot fight it.

“Those who pretend to fight inflation are in fact only fighting what is the inevitable consequence of inflation, rising prices. Their ventures are doomed to failure because they do not attack the root of the evil. They try to keep prices low while firmly committed to a policy of increasing the quantity of money that must necessarily make them soar.”

The Tariff Effect

As I’ve already said, tariffs will cause some prices to rise. They might even cause a lot of prices to rise. But they won’t cause all prices to rise. That only happens with an increase in the money supply.

Unlike price increases due to an increase in the money supply, price hikes due to socks such as tariffs are balanced out by price decreases in other areas of the economy as people shift spending patterns.

Think about your own spending habits. If rising prices start to squeeze your budget, you will cut your spending in other areas to make ends meet. Let’s say the price of X goes up because of a tariff. If you can’t cut back on X or substitute something else, you’ll have to buy less Y to free up money in your budget. Lower demand for Y will cause its price to drop. In a stable money supply environment, some prices rise, and others fall, balancing out the general price level.

The only way you can keep buying the same amount of stuff in a rising price environment is to get more money. If you had a money printing press (like the Fed) you wouldn’t have to worry about rising prices. But you don’t, so you do. You make adjustments.

This reveals how monetary inflation works. More dollars chasing the same level of goods and services cause all prices to generally rise. Monetary inflation essentially raises the floor on prices, making all of them go up.

Imagine a land where green rocks served as money. In this economy, an apple costs 1 green rock. One day, somebody finds a massive stash of green rocks, doubling the supply. As the new rocks work through the economy, everybody has more so they can afford more apples. With the increase in demand, apple growers can double the price to two green rocks. Consumers are willing to pay it because have more green rocks. They can afford it. This same phenomenon will happen throughout the economy, causing the general price level to rise. In effect, the purchasing power of one green rock halved because there are twice as many green rocks.

So, while tariffs will put upward pressure on a lot of prices, they won’t impact all of them. It won’t cause “inflation.” The Federal Reserve does that by creating money and incentivizing debt.

But Powell & Company over at the Fed would sure like you to think tariffs are causing price inflation. That gets them off the hook and allows them to quietly keep creating inflation while pointing the finger of blame across the street at the White House.


Mike Maharrey is a journalist and market analyst for MoneyMetals.com with over a decade of experience in precious metals. He holds a BS in accounting from the University of Kentucky and a BA in journalism from the University of South Florida.

Young, Hot Trump Partygoers Seek Vengeance on NY Magazine Over Racism ‘Slander’

(Julianna Frieman, Headline USA) The host of an inaugural bash filled with young, hot Trump supporters announced Tuesday that he plans to take legal action against New York Magazine’s slanderous article branding attendees as “racists.”

The article, published on Jan. 27, called the conservative partygoers  “Cruel Kids” and falsely stated that “the entire room [was] white.” New York Magazine packaged the piece with a cover image that cropped out multiple black Trump supporters.

Party host C.J. Pearson, who is black, announced one week after the article dropped that he has retained legal counsel and plans to “fight back” against the outlet’s false claims.

“NEWS: I have made the decision to retain legal counsel and will soon issue @NYMag formal notice,” Pearson, co-chair of the GOP Youth Advisory Council, wrote on X.

He added, “For TOO long, the media has been allowed to slander conservatives, painting us as racists without consequence. In the same spirit as @realDonaldTrump, it’s time we fight back.”

Republican lawmakers rallied behind Pearson’s move to hold New York Magazine accountable for its race-baiting hoax, including Reps. Anna Paulina Luna, R-Fla., and Nancy Mace, R-S.C.

“They’re also incredibly racist. Such a failed hit piece. Keep fighting,” Luna wrote on X.

Mace replied to Pearson’s announcement by echoing Trump’s, “Fight fight fight!” rallying cry.

Immediately after New York Magazine published the article, Pearson and other young Republicans who went to the inaugural party shared additional photos showcasing its diverse array of guests.

One photo shared online was the full spread of the outlet’s cropped cover photo, which revealed at least three black people cut off to the left.

Pearson, who the article did not even mention, initially reacted by saying, “You don’t hate the media enough.”

New York Magazine hasn’t issued a correction for its story as of the publication of this article.

Julianna Frieman is Deputy Editor of Headline USA. She is also an author at the Daily Caller, The Federalist, and the American Spectator. Follow her on X at @JuliannaFrieman.

Dem. Rep. Thinks President Trump Should Leave US to Make Room for Illegal Migrants

(Julianna Frieman, Headline USA) Rep. Jasmine Crockett, D-Texas, suggested Monday night on CNN that President Donald Trump holds less of a claim to U.S. citizenship than illegal immigrants.

In a racially charged rant bashing white Americans, Crockett said “there is no comparison” between herself and Reps. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., and Lauren Boebert, R- Colo. because she had to “work 10 times as hard as they did” to win her House seat.

“The only people that are crying are the mediocre white boys that have been beaten out by people that historically have had to work so much harder,” she said, poking at Trump’s crackdown on diversity, equity and inclusion policies before bizarrely suggesting Republicans don’t want black Americans to have access to education.

Crockett claimed Trump would defund historically black colleges and universities, but the Republican president had not announced such a move as part of his crackdown on DEI.

“You know why? Because they don’t want anymore Kamala Harrises. They don’t want anymore Jasmine Crocketts,” the Democrat congresswoman continued, speaking fast as she spiraled out.

Crockett assured Democrats will “fight to the end” to protect DEI initiatives before pivoting to Trump’s mass deportations. She said Trump “shouldn’t be in this country” before prattling off about the president’s “ancestors” as Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents remove dangerous illegal migrants from the U.S.

“If you wanna talk about the people who shouldn’t be in this country, you probably need to look in the mirror. Because the last time I checked, the Native Americans who some of ICE have been rounding up or the Puerto Ricans who are absolutely Americans,” the Democrat representative added.

Crockett topped off her meltdown by telling CNN’s Laura Coates, “The only people that came to colonize this place are your ancestors, Trump.”

Julianna Frieman is Deputy Editor of Headline USA. She is also an author at the Daily Caller, The Federalist, and the American Spectator. Follow her on X at @JuliannaFrieman.

‘You Go Die’: CNN, MSNBC Go Mad over Trump’s Move to Dismantle USAID

(Julianna Frieman, Headline USA) Talking heads on CNN and MSNBC went ballistic Monday night over President Donald Trump’s move to dismantle the U.S. Agency for International Development.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced Monday that he took over as acting director of USAID during a gaggle with reporters after he touched down in El Salvador.

Democrat politicians ranted and raved Monday outside the USAID headquarters building to protest bureaucrats who were instructed by the Trump administration not to come to work to waste American taxpayer dollars.

Later that night, MSNBC’s Joy Reid spun Trump’s crackdown on wasteful spending as a “coup” as she suggested that stopping corruption at USAID was akin to overthrowing the government.

“If this were happening in any other country right now, I promise you, I’d be on air calling it a coup,” Reid raged.

Reid’s sentiments were echoed by other liberal pundits, including former Biden White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki, who claimed that Department of Government Efficiency head Elon Musk targeted USAID because he was “uncomfortable” with how USAID fought against “corruption.”

“[USAID] not only leads on humanitarian assistance around the world but also works to combat corruption and foreign aid programs. I kind of see how that could make Elon Musk a bit uncomfortable,” she said.

CNN’s Van Jones was even more hysterical than his female counterparts, claiming that the president’s effort to reform USAID was a message for the rest of the world to “die.”

“Donald Trump says, ‘We don’t care. You go die.’ That’s the message from the United States government,” Jones said, adding that cutting off USAID’s gigantic foreign aid programs will lead to “people dying in very large numbers around the world.”

CNN token conservative Scott Jennings, for his part, defended the Trump administration’s actions. He told his anti-Trump colleagues on a panel that the “soft stupidity” of USAID has got to go.

“There is a difference between smart soft power and dumb spending by the leftwing ideologues who inhabit this bureaucracy,” Jennings said.

He added, “There is a difference between soft power and soft stupidity. So whether you’re funding like DEI musicals in some country or transgender surgery somewhere or whatever, that is not what most Americans would say is an effective part of U.S. foreign policy.”

Contrary to what the liberal talking heads told their viewers, the USAID has a long history of being used essentially as a CIA cutout.

In 2003, for instance, the Bush administration used the USAID to foment a coup against the Georgian government. More recently, the Biden administration’s head of USAID, Samantha Power, was involved in numerous regime-change efforts—most notoriously, in Libya. Power was also accused last February of fomenting unrest in Hungary, where Viktor Orban crushed his globalist opponents in the nation’s 2022 elections.

Along with those cases, intelligence expert Mike Benz made the case earlier this week that USAID was responsible for former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro losing his country’s election to socialist-leaning Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva in 2022.

“If USAID did not exist, Bolsonaro would still be the president of Brazil and Brazil would still have a free and open internet,” Benz said on Catch Up.

Julianna Frieman is Deputy Editor of Headline USA. She is also an author at the Daily Caller, The Federalist, and the American Spectator. Follow her on X at @JuliannaFrieman.

Calif. Largest Property Insurer Demanding 22% Rate Hike after Wildfires

(Kenneth Schrupp, The Center Square) State Farm, California’s largest property insurer, is demanding a 22% emergency rate hike after the Southern California fires, saying that over the last years it has paid out $1.26 in claims for every dollar in premiums it has collected.

Since the passage of Prop. 103 in 1988, state regulators have had to approve any rate hikes, which has led to rates not keeping up with rising claims and risks.

State Farm says that as a result, it has lost $5 billion over the last nine years in California, and that it had no option but to stop underwriting new policies in 2023.

“With further capital deterioration as a result of the wildfires, additional downgrades could follow. If that were to happen, customers with a mortgage might not be able to use State Farm General insurance on the collateral backing for their mortgage,” wrote State Farm. “Even before the January wildfires, at year-end 2024, State Farm General’s Policyholder Protection Fund – or capital available to pay future claims – was approximately a quarter of what it was in 2016.”

State Farm also did not renew policies for 30,000 homeowners in March 2024 in an “ongoing” non-renewal process, but said that “homeowner policies which had pending non-renewals in Los Angeles County that were on the books on January 7th will have an option to renew.”

For homeowners without any available standard market insurance, the state-regulated FAIR Plan of last resort has been an option, albeit with higher rates and low coverage maximums.

With the FAIR Plan holding $6 billion of liability in the now-devastated Pacific Palisades alone—a figure boosted by recent State Farm non-renewals in the area—the plan could have no choice but to pass major assessments on to customers.

It could take out new bonds if a new state bill authorizing them to do so passes—which would likely result in the passing of these new costs on to customers—or require the authorization of a state or even federal bailout.

Trump’s ‘Border Czar’ Threatens Prosecution against NJ Gov. for Harboring Female Migrant

Update: After the publication of this story, news broke that Trump’s “border czar,” Tom Homan, will push to have Gov. Murphy prosecuted if he’s indeed harboring an illegal alien above his garage. The headline of this story was changed accordingly, while the body remains unchanged. See Homan’s comments here. 

(Julianna Frieman, Headline USA) Gov. Phil Murphy, D-N.J., apparently admitted to a crime over the weekend when he bragged about harboring a female illegal immigrant. But on Monday, he said his claim was “misinterpreted.”

 

As the Trump administration facilitates mass deportations across the U.S., Murphy joined a group of ICE-bashing leftists on Saturday at Montclair State University, where he said that he was actively defying the federal government by hiding an illegal alien in his home.

“I don’t want to get into too much detail, but there’s someone in our broader universe whose immigration status is not yet at the point that they are trying to get it to and we said, ‘You know what, let’s have her live at our house above our garage,’” Murphy said.

“And good luck to the feds coming in trying to get her,” he added.

After Murphy’s comments received media attention, the governor’s representative suggested that Murphy’s claims were misleading, according to the New York Post. Murphy was reportedly referring to a legal resident in his orbit who was just worried about Trump’s illegal migrant crackdown, the governor’s representative claimed.

Murphy’s representative told the outlet that “no one’s ever lived in the home” with the illegal status that Murphy described.

Murphy’s claim about housing a female above his garage overshadowed some of the other inflammatory comments he made Saturday, such as when he parroted the Democrat talking point comparing Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids to Nazi Germany.

“The Germans in the ‘20s and ‘30s got tired, they got sick of fighting, and look at the price we paid,” the New Jersey leader said, as reported by the Post.

Murphy called for “an intensity” from Democrats against Trump’s agenda, complaining that voters from his party did not turn out “against this guy” enough to stop Trump’s second term.

“I mean, my God, it’s not like we’re wondering what he’s gonna be like,” the governor said. “We know what he’s like, and we can’t let that happen again ever, ever, ever.”

Julianna Frieman is Deputy Editor of Headline USA. She is also an author at the Daily Caller, The Federalist, and the American Spectator. Follow her on X at @JuliannaFrieman.

The FBI Has a Secret Team of UFO Hunters, Which Trump Might Gut

(Ken Silva, Headline USA) Politico reported Monday that the FBI has a previously undisclosed “working group” devoted to tracking unidentified anomalous phenomena, or UAPs—also known as UFOs.

Some agents in that group also worked on cases stemming from the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol Hill uprising. Donald Trump’s Justice Department has ordered the FBI to compile a list of the more than 1,000 agents who investigated J6ers, and many of those agents could soon be losing their job—including those in the UAP group.

“I have spoken to several agents from the UAP Working Group who are afraid of losing their role and the investigation getting unintentionally compromised,” Ryan Graves, executive director of Americans for Safe Aerospace and a former Navy pilot, told Politico.

“I am concerned that the FBI’s UAP Working Group could be affected by transition changes, and these leaders might not be aware of the incredible work these agents are doing and how their investigation could be empowered as part of a formalized intergovernmental effort,” he said.

According to Graves and three other anonymous sources, the UAP Working Group consists of a national program manager and more than a dozen employees across the country. Graves told Politico that he has referred witnesses and provided intelligence to the FBI team. He reportedly said the agents have supplemented his tips with classified information.

“This FBI Working Group is uniquely positioned to investigate UAP due to their joint law enforcement and intelligence authorities,” he said, adding he was “deeply worried that agents key to the investigation of UAP could be removed, which would undermine the Trump Administration’s commitment to take the U out of UAP.”

The FBI, for its part, declined to comment on Trump’s potential firings. The bureau did confirm the existence of its previously undisclosed UFO group.

“While we have no comment on any questions regarding FBI personnel matters, the FBI investigates Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena when there is potential for a violation of federal law — particularly unlawful acts that could adversely affect our national interests — and to gather, share, and analyze intelligence to combat security threats facing the U.S.,” the FBI told Politico.

The disclosure of the FBI’s UAP Working Group comes as Congress investigates dubious claims that the Pentagon has evidence of alien life. The so-called alien whistleblower disclosures haven’t included any physical evidence—amounting thus far to unsubstantiated claims by officials with secondhand knowledge.

Sean Kirkpatrick, who once led the Pentagon’s search for UFOs, said last year that the entire alien investigation is based on a hoax.

Ken Silva is a staff writer at Headline USA. Follow him at x.com/jd_cashless.

Press Sec. Leavitt Exposes USAID’s Reckless Use of Tax Dollars; Rubio Steps In

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) The Trump administration has formally seized control of USAID after decades of the infamous agency operating with little oversight, often unilaterally using taxpayer dollars to undermine U.S. foreign policy. 

President Donald Trump tapped Secretary of State Marco Rubio as acting director and blocked USAID bureaucrats from entering the agency’s Washington headquarters on Monday. 

Addressing reporters while in El Salvador, Rubio said his “frustration with USAID goes back” to his time in the Senate. “It’s a completely unresponsive agency,” he said. “It’s supposed to respond to policy directives of the State Department, and it refuses to do so.” 

Trump’s decisive action followed USAID’s failed attempt to block representatives from the Department of Government Efficiency from accessing its files.  

The blockade was shocking—it meant a handful of unelected bureaucrats at an executive agency were actively defying orders from the president, the head of the executive branch. 

Rubio slammed USAID’s stonewalling, calling it concerning. He specifically said, “I’m very troubled by these reports that they’ve been unwilling to cooperate with people who are asking simple questions about: ‘What does this program do? Who gets the money? Who are our contractors?’” 

Rubio added that this “level of insubordination makes it impossible to conduct a sort of mature and serious review that I think foreign aid writ large should have.” He also reminded reporters that USAID’s multibillion-dollar budget is funded by taxpayers, not donations.  

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt echoed Rubio’s concerns, exposing some of USAID’s wasteful spending. 

“If you look at the waste and abuse that has run through USAID over the past several years, these are some of the insane priorities that organization has been spending money on,” Leavitt told reporters outside the White House on Monday.

She called out USAID for spending $1.5 million to “advance DEI in Serbia’s workplaces;” $70,000 for a production of a “DEI musical in Ireland;” $47,000 for a “transgender opera” in Colombia; and $32,000 for a “transgender comic book” in Peru. 

“I don’t know about you but as an American taxpayer, I don’t want my dollars going toward this crap, and I know the American people don’t either,” Leavitt declared. 

While Rubio now serves as the de-facto head of what’s left of USAID, Trump ally Peter W. Marocco has been tapped to oversee the agency’s review and imminent budget cuts. 

Biden, So-Called Law and Order President, Ignored DOJ’s Warnings on Pardons

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) Former President Joe Biden ignored his own DOJ’s recommendations against pardoning and commuting the sentences of nearly 90 percent of convicted criminals, The Wall Street Journal revealed on Sunday. 

While unsurprising, the move further exposes Biden’s self-proclaimed status as a “law and order” president as nothing but a farce. He is now the only president in U.S. history to use his pardon powers to shield his own family from potential legal consequences. 

According to The Journal, out of the 2,500 criminals Biden pardoned, only 10 percent—just 258—were recommended by the DOJ. 

Biden’s blanket clemencies triggered widespread condemnation from federal prosecutors, prompting DOJ pardon attorney Elizabeth Oyer to address the outrage in a mass email. 

“While I am a strong believer in the possibility of second chances through clemency, the process by which yesterday’s action was carried out was not what we had hoped and advocated for,” Oyer wrote, according to The Journal. 

She acknowledged the controversy, admitting, “I understand that some of the clemency grants are very upsetting.” 

Oyer also conceded that Biden made the decisions unilaterally: “This action was not carried out in consultation with the Office of the Pardon Attorney and there was little coordination with the Department.” 

Among those who benefited from Biden’s sweeping pardons were 37 of the 40 inmates on federal death row, whose sentences were converted to life without parole. This enraged the families of their victims—many of whom were brutally murdered and raped. 

“Make no mistake: I condemn these murderers, grieve for the victims of their despicable acts, and ache for all the families who have suffered unimaginable and irreparable loss,” Biden claimed in response. 

Others granted clemency include Adrian Peeler, convicted of conspiracy to distribute cocaine. Previously, he had been sentenced for the murder conspiracy of the 1999 killing of an 8-year-old child and his mother. Peeler will now be freed in 2025 instead of 2033, thanks to Biden. 

Another recipient, Lairon Graham, saw his sentence slashed from 22 years to less than 13. He had pleaded guilty to narcotics conspiracy and other charges tied to his coercion of young women into prostitution. According to The Journal, Graham beat one of his victims nearly every day.