Who Voted for This? GOP Lawmakers Colluding w/ Dems to Push for Immigration Amnesty

(José Niño, Headline USA) Behind closed doors in Washington, Republicans are weighing potential immigration compromises — one of which is now being described as the party’s biggest ideological betrayal since the Trump era began.

Twitter user Joseph Jordan (@Littoria14) observed that the “Biggest story of the week is that Congressional Republicans (Jim Jordan, Salazar, etc) are teaming up with Democrats to draw up an immigration amnesty. If you’re an orange knight time to start brainstorming copes now because the final nail in the coffin is coming.”

In this instance, the Twitter user Jordan is referring to Rep. María Elvira Salazar’s, R-Fla., Dignity Act of 2025, that was introduced last Tuesday. The legislation would provide up to seven years of renewable legal status to illegal aliens who arrived before 2021, complete with work authorization and travel privileges.

The bill has bipartisan support from 20 lawmakers.

Republican Co-Sponsors (10)

  1. Rep. Dan Newhouse, R-Wash.
  2. Rep. Mike Lawler, R-N.Y.
  3. Rep. David Valadao, R-Calif.
  4. Rep. Mike Kelly, R-Pa.
  5. Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick, R-Pa.
  6. Rep. Gabe Evans, R-Colo.
  7. Rep. Marlin Stutzman, R-Ind.
  8. Rep. Don Bacon, R-Neb.
  9. Rep. Mario Rafael Díaz‑Balart, R-Fla.
  10. Rep. Young Kim, R-Calif.

Democratic Co-Sponsors (10)

  1. Rep. Adriano Espaillat, D-N.Y.
  2. Rep. Susie Lee, D-Nev.
  3. Rep. Salud Carbajal, D-Calif.
  4. Rep. Mike Levin, D-Calif.
  5. Rep. Lori Trahan, D-Mass.
  6. Rep. Hilary Scholten, D-Mich.
  7. Rep. Nikki Budzinski, D-Ill.
  8. Rep. Jake Auchincloss, D-Mass.
  9. Rep. Adam Gray, D-Calif.
  10. Rep. Laura Gillen, D-N.Y.

However, Conservative media outlets like the Federalist have called this legislation as “amnesty by another name.”

Salazar insists that this bill represents “no amnesty, no handouts, no citizenship.” Nevertheless, this bill creates what amounts to permanent legal residence without the traditional pathway to citizenship.

Top Trump ally Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, will likely a play a major role in this bill’s passage if it continues to gain steam.

As Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, Jordan wields significant control over immigration legislation, making his role in any potential amnesty deal absolutely crucial. The committee has direct jurisdiction over all immigration matters, meaning Jordan serves as the primary gatekeeper for whether the Dignity Act receives hearings, markup sessions, or advances to a floor vote.

In a prior report, Headline USA noted that Jordan has publicly signaled openness to H-1B visa expansion. In March, he told Politico that he was “eyeing his party’s flagship immigration bill as the legislative vehicle for overhauling existing laws to increase the flow of immigrants into the United States with expertise in science, technology and engineering.”

This represents a dramatic shift from traditional immigration restrictionist positions that the Republican Party has generally embraced in the Trump era, particularly given Jordan’s public stance that he is “steadfastly against illegal immigration and amnesty for illegal immigrants.”

Jordan has not publicly demonstrated support for the Dignity Act thus far. However, there has been speculation in conservative circles that the passage of a mass amnesty is something DC leaders are potentially considering.

As Headline USA previously reported, Charlie Kirk sounded the alarm over what he described as a covert push for mass amnesty in the wake of the passage of Donald Trump’s “Big Beautiful Bill” and Trump’s subsequent proposal of partnering with farmers and hotel owners to grant legal status to workers who have lived in the country for 14 to 15 years.

Kirk warned that GOP elites and corporate interests are pressuring Trump to legalize millions of illegal immigrants. While Kirk claims his warnings have temporarily stalled the effort, he insists the threat of “amnesty by another name” still looms large.

FBI Failed to ‘Comprehensively’ Investigate Hillary Clinton Email Scandal, Declassified Info Reveals

(Luis CornelioHeadline USA) The FBI hastily completed its review of potentially damning evidence against twice-failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, Senate Judiciary Committee Chair Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, announced Monday. 

A new report released by the Senate Judiciary Committee revealed that FBI agents declined to “comprehensively” analyze thumb drives that may have contained classified material. The reason? There were concerns the drive included emails from former President Barack Obama and other top Democrats. 

A confidential source had given the thumb drive to the FBI, which reportedly included State Department data obtained through a cyber hack. 

Tellingly, an internal draft memo said it was necessary to “assess the national security risks” posed by Clinton’s use of a private email server for official business. 

“This document shows an extreme lack of effort and due diligence in the FBI’s investigation of former Secretary Clinton’s email usage and mishandling of highly classified information,” Grassley said. 

The findings come from a declassified appendix that was originally part of a June 2018 Justice Department inspector general report.  

Grassley said he had sought to obtain the appendix in 2018 from then-Attorney General Bill Barr without success. The Trump administration did not release the file in 2020 either, Grassley lamented. 

“I warned years ago that the Clinton investigation failed to hit the mark, and I’m grateful the American people can finally see the facts for themselves,” Grassley added. 

He thanked Attorney General Pam Bondi and FBI veteran Kash Patel for moving forward with the release. 

The Senate Judiciary singled out disgraced former FBI Director James Comey, then-Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe and former FBI Special Agent Peter Strzok for failing to conduct “additional, targeted searches of the drives, even though they contained information relevant to the inquiry.” 

The 2018 inspector general report concluded that the FBI failed to adequately complete the Clinton probe, ultimately neglecting to “vet the serious national security risks created by Clinton’s careless handling of highly classified information.” 

The federal government’s willingness to shield Clinton and Obama stood in stark contrast to how the FBI and DOJ treated President Donald Trump after he temporarily left office in 2021. 

The FBI raided Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate in 2022, rifled through First Lady Melania Trump’s drawers and seized documents, security footage and more, all in a bid to target Trump. Some of these seized files were also leaked to the legacy media even as the investigation remained ongoing. 

Report: Sen. Paul Closed Trump Shooting Investigation without Consulting Colleagues

(Ken Silva, Headline USA) On the one-year anniversary of the Butler Trump assassination attempt, Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., issued what he deemed a “final report”—one that detailed the failures made by Secret Service agents in planning for the July 13, 2024, event.

Paul released the report, even though Congress has received barely any information from the FBI or the ATF. And according to The Washington Times, Paul closed the Trump shooting investigation over the objections of his colleagues, including Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wisc., and even ranking member Sen. Gary Peters, D-Mich.

“We had a true bipartisan product last year. It came out very quickly, and everybody on the committee signed off on it. It’s interesting in this report; it was only Rand Paul, and not even another Republican signed onto it,” Peters reportedly told the Times.

“Basically, the report he put out is just rehashing the report we did last year,” he said. “So there was really little or no extra work that was put into his report, except that he came up with some conclusions. And the conclusions, they weren’t necessarily supported by any new facts that he put forward.”

According to the Times, Paul said that the investigation “has gone on too long.”

“We’ve essentially got the conclusions,” Paul reportedly said. “Big mistakes were made. It shouldn’t have happened. The president almost died. And reforms had to take place. We think most of those have taken place.”

Luckily for those who want more information about the case, Sen. Johnson hasn’t fallen in line with Paul. Johnson subpoenaed the FBI last week for a trove of records it holds on the shooting and alleged would-be assassin Thomas Crooks—including surveillance footage that might show Crooks being chased by police before his attack.

Indeed, Johnson’s subpoena asks for footage taken from a security camera at an ice cream shop that has a clear vantage of the AGR building—where the gunman used as a rooftop perch.

Additionally, the subpoena demands footage from the Clairton Sportsmen’s Club, where Crooks frequented in the last year of his life. Finally, the subpoena demands Crooks’ internet history, which likely includes terabytes of data from his social media accounts and other online activity—crucial evidence that presumably reveals his motivation, and whether others were involved.

Johnson demands the evidence by Aug. 1. His subpoena comes as the new administration continues to backtrack on transparency promises.

“I had expected the FBI to be more forthcoming with the public and provide my office with the records we have been seeking for months. I am issuing the subpoena to help prompt transparency and I look forward to Director [Kashyap] Patel’s full cooperation,” Johnson said in a press release.

Ken Silva is the editor of Headline USA. Follow him at x.com/jd_cashless.

Maryland and Washington State Impose Sales Taxes on Gold and Silver Bullion

(Mike Maharrey, Money Metals News Service) Over the last few years, several states have exempted gold and silver bullion from sales taxes, but during the 2025 legislative session, two went the opposite direction.

Bill passed in Maryland and Washington State imposed sales taxes on bullion, effectively levying a tax on exchanging one type of money for another.

In Maryland, the Budget Reconciliation and Financing Act of 2025 (HB352), introduced by House Speaker Adrienne Jones on behalf of the Gov. Wes Moore administration, includes provisions that impose a sales tax on gold and silver bullion and coins unless the total transaction is greater than $1,000 and the sale occurs at the Baltimore Convention Center. In practice, the sales tax will apply to all bullion sales that don’t occur at an event at the convention center.

In Washington, Senate Bill 5794 (SB5794), sponsored by Sen. Jesse Solomon and 11 fellow Democrats, simply repealed the sales tax exemption on precious metal bullion or monetized bullion that had been in place since 1985.

Sound Money Defense League director Jp Cortez said these states not only bucked a nationwide trend, but they will harm a large number of people in those states.

“Unfortunately, Washington and Maryland have recently turned to taxing constitutional money as a means of revenue generation for the state. The overwhelming trend nationwide is to end taxes on the metals, but dollar amount thresholds and venue conditions like Maryland has imposed, or outright full imposition of taxes on the metals like in Washington, harm investors, dealers, and even state revenues, which will likely decrease as a result of commerce, businesses, and tourism and convention dollars leaving the state.”

Impact

Imagine if you asked a grocery clerk to break a $5 bill, and he charged you a 35-cent tax. Silly, right? After all, you were only exchanging one form of money for another. But that’s essentially what a sales tax on gold and silver bullion does.

By levying taxes on the exchange of gold and silver, states treat gold and silver specie more like a commodity instead of money.

“We ought not to tax money – and that’s a good idea. It makes no sense to tax money,” former U.S. Rep. Ron Paul said during testimony in support of an Arizona bill that repealed capital gains taxes on gold and silver in that state. “Paper is not money, it’s fraud,” he continued.

From a practical standpoint, these taxes further burden people trying to escape the relentless devaluation of their fiat dollars by incessant government money creation.

Gold and silver shield people from inflation. They hold their value over time, unlike dollars. Taxes like those imposed by Maryland and Washington erect another barrier in front of people who are merely trying to preserve their wealth over time.

These taxes also make it more difficult for people to use gold and silver in transactions. This ultimately supports the Federal Reserve’s pernicious monopoly on money. 

Background

The United States Constitution states in Article I, Section 10, “No State shall…make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts.” Currently, all debts and taxes in most states are either paid with Federal Reserve Notes (dollars), which were authorized as legal tender by Congress, or with coins issued by the U.S. Treasury – very few of which have gold or silver in them.

The Federal Reserve destroys this constitutional monetary system by creating a monopoly based on its fiat paper currency. Without the backing of gold or silver, the central bank can easily create money out of thin air.

This not only devalues your purchasing power over time; it also allows the federal government to borrow and spend far beyond what would be possible in a sound money system. Without the Fed, the U.S. government wouldn’t be able to maintain all its unconstitutional wars and programs. The Federal Reserve is the engine that drives the most powerful government in the history of the world.

State laws that facilitate and encourage the use of sound money create a playing field where people can push back against the Fed’s monetary malfeasance. Ultimately, it could create a scenario where people can drive out the “bad” fiat money with “good” sound money. Taxes, such as those imposed by Maryland and Washington, do the opposite, making it more difficult for gold and silver to function as money. While it may benefit governments by providing a modest revenue stream, it harms the citizens the government supposedly serves.


Mike Maharrey is a journalist and market analyst for Money Metals with over a decade of experience in precious metals. He holds a BS in accounting from the University of Kentucky and a BA in journalism from the University of South Florida.

Joe Biden Was Drugged for the Disastrous 2024 Debate, Hunter Claims

(Luis CornelioHeadline USA) Disgraced former first son Hunter Biden went off on the Democratic Party, former allies and even CNN for turning their backs on his father shortly after his disastrous debate with President Donald Trump. 

Hunter delivered the fiery rebuke Monday in his first post-election interview on Channel 5 with Andrew Callaghan—ripping actor George Clooney, former Obama advisor David Axelrod, longtime Democratic operative Anita Dunn and others.

“F*ck him and everybody around him… F*cking George Clooney is not a f*cking actor. He’s a brand,” Hunter ranted, addressing the actor who became the leading face of the pressure campaign to push Biden out of the 2024 race.

“James Carville hasn’t won a race in 40 f*cking years,” he added, targeting the Democratic strategist who recently called Joe Biden a “sad” figure. 

Hunter then tore into Axelrod, calling his “one success in his political life” a byproduct of former President Barack Obama. 

“The Pod Save America guys were junior f*cking speech writers on Barack Obama’s Senate staff who have been dining out on the relationship with him, making millions,” he added, referencing former Obama aides Jon Favreau, Jon Lovett, Dan Pfeiffer and Tommy Vietor. 

And that wasn’t all. 

Hunter accused Dunn—one of the key individuals in pushing Biden to debate Trump early—of raking in “$40-$50 million off the Democratic Party.”  

Biden’s decision to debate Trump backfired spectacularly as Trump exposed the president’s mental decline for millions of Americans to see. 

White House officials rushed to cover for Biden, claiming the future one-term president was sick. Hunter offered another excuse: Ambien, the drug used to treat insomnia. 

“He flew around the world. He’s 81 years old. He’s tired. They give him Ambien to be able to sleep and he gets up on the stage and looks like a deer in the headlights,” he said.

Even some leftist personalities did not buy the excuse. For instance, CNN anchor Jake Tapper long parroted Biden-approved talking points but suddenly reversed course with Original Sin. 

This book confirmed what conservative outlets had covered for years: the White House ran a cover-up to hide Biden’s decline from the public. 

Hunter also scolded Tapper on Monday. “What influence does Jake Tapper have over anything? He has the smallest audience on cable news,” Hunter said. 

As usual, Tapper did not directly respond to Headline USA’s request for comment. Instead, he passed it off to a CNN spokesperson, who replied with a fawning statement:

“Jake Tapper is one of the most influential political journalists of his time. His award-winning programs The Lead with Jake Tapper and State of the Union with Jake Tapper and Dana Bash reach broad global audiences across CNN, CNN International and HBO Max with significant digital extensions across CNN.com and social platforms. No single metric can capture the true reach and impact of a journalist driving the national conversation, but Jake’s work and his outsized influence speak for themselves.”

Clips from the Hunter Biden interview are going viral across social media platforms. 

Investigators Exploring Whether Grenades Caused Blast that Killed 3 LA Deputies

(Headline USAAuthorities are looking into whether grenades recovered from a Santa Monica apartment complex caused an explosion last week at a Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department training facility that killed three members of its arson and explosives unit.

Investigators served a search warrant Monday morning at an address in the Marina del Rey neighborhood. The department didn’t say what, if anything, was found as detectives chase leads following the deadly blast early Friday at the Biscailuz Training Facility.

Officials said they are exploring whether there may be a connection to the discovery on Thursday of grenades at an apartment complex in Santa Monica, a few miles north of Marina del Rey. The three members of the arson and explosives team responded that day to assist local police.

Los Angeles County Sheriff Robert Luna said the deaths marked the department’s worst loss of life in a single incident since 1857, when four officers were killed by gunfire.

Those killed on Friday were identified by the department as Detective Joshua Kelley-Eklund, Detective Victor Lemus and Detective William Osborn. They served 19, 22 and 33 years in the department respectively, Luna said.

The deaths are being investigated by the department’s homicide detectives, with the assistance of the FBI and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives.

Luna said Friday that it took more than four hours to render the scene safe and the deaths were being investigated by the department’s homicide detectives, with the assistance of the FBI and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. No one else was injured, he said.

The sheriff said the arson and explosives team undergoes in-depth training and responds to more than 1,000 calls a year.

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

Cat Fight: AOC and MTG Clash Over Israel Defense Aid

(José Niño, Headline USA) Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, R-N.Y., and Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., are back in the headlines after clashing over funding for Israel’s Iron Dome missile defense system.

The most recent flashpoint occurred when Rep. Greene proposed an amendment to the 2026 Defense Appropriations Act seeking to cut $500 million in funding for Israel’s missile defense systems, including the Iron Dome. The House overwhelmingly rejected Greene’s amendment with a vote of 422-6, with AOC voting against the amendment, effectively supporting continued funding for Israel’s defense systems.

Greene argued that the United States, facing a $37 trillion national debt, should stop providing foreign aid to “nuclear-armed Israel,” which she claimed is “very capable of defending themselves.” Only six lawmakers supported the amendment: Reps. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., Rep. Thomas Massie, R‑Ky., Rep. Al Green, D‑Texas, Rep. Summer Lee, D‑Pa., Rep. Ilhan Omar, D‑Minn., and Rep. Rashida Tlaib, D‑Mich.

Following criticism from progressive activists for voting against Greene’s amendment, AOC defended her position on social media. According to her statement on X (formerly Twitter):

“Marjorie Taylor Greene’s amendment does nothing to cut off offensive aid to Israel nor end the flow of US munitions being used in Gaza. Of course I voted against it”

She continued: “What it does do is cut off defensive Iron Dome capacities while allowing the actual bombs killing Palestinians to continue. I have long stated that I do not believe that adding to the death count of innocent victims to this war is constructive to its end. ‘

The two congresswoman have been at loggerheads over the last 5 years.

The most inflammatory tweet exchange between the two congresswomen occurred in May 2021, during a period of heightened violence between Israel and Palestine. The controversy began when AOC posted a tweet condemning antisemitism, writing: “We will never, ever tolerate antisemitism here in NY or anywhere in the world. The recent surge in attacks is horrifying. We stand with our Jewish communities in condemning this violence.”

Greene responded with a highly inflammatory tweet that directly quoted her saying:

“@AOC you’re responsible for attacks on Jewish people bc of your hate-Israel stance against Israel’s right to defend itself from terrorists Hamas, calling Israel an apartheid state, & supporting terrorists groups. Aligning yourself with terrorists means your a terrorist.”

Beyond the tweet exchanges, Greene has physically confronted AOC on multiple occasions. In May 2021, Greene aggressively approached AOC outside the House chamber, shouting questions and accusations. According to Washington Post reporters who witnessed the incident, Greene yelled: “Why do you support terrorists and antifa?” and “You don’t care about the American people.”

The controversy is complicated by AOC’s previous voting history on Israel funding. In September 2021, AOC initially opposed a $1 billion Iron Dome funding bill but changed her vote from “no” to “present” at the last minute, appearing to cry on the House floor. This drew criticism from both pro-Palestine activists who felt she had backed down and pro-Israel supporters who questioned her emotional display.

AOC’s recent vote against Greene’s amendment has drawn criticism from multiple sides. The Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) condemned her vote, stating: “An arms embargo means keeping all arms out of the hands of a genocidal military, no exceptions. This is why we oppose Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s vote against an amendment that would have blocked $500 million in funding for the Israeli military’s Iron Dome program.”

José Niño is the deputy editor of Headline USA. Follow him at x.com/JoseAlNino 

Watchdogs: BlackRock Still Boycotts Texas Energy Despite Being Removed from ESG List

(Tom Joyce, The Center Square) A new report says BlackRock, the world’s largest investment firm, is still acting against fossil fuel companies in violation of Texas law, even though the company was recently removed from the state’s boycott list.

Texas passed a law in 2021 called Senate Bill 13. It’s aimed at preventing financial companies from punishing or limiting business with fossil fuel producers if the reasons go beyond what federal or state law requires. The goal is to protect Texas energy jobs and companies from pressure tied to environmental activism.

Companies on the list are barred from doing business with the Texas state government.

BlackRock was on that boycott list but was removed earlier this year. The company said it had changed its approach and was no longer targeting fossil fuel companies.

However, the American Energy Institute and Consumers’ Research say BlackRock is still pushing companies to meet climate goals that go far beyond the law.

Their joint report points to BlackRock’s voting rules that push companies to set so-called “science-based” net-zero emissions targets; these goals aim to phase out fossil fuels by 2050.

“It’s important, because as they try to escape the consequences of those actions, people need to be served by all the facts,” Will Hild, executive director of Consumers’ Research, told The Center Square in a phone interview. “This report puts an end to the mess that BlackRock is currently spreading – that they’ve corrected or ended their actions boycotting or punishing the oil, gas and other industries they think need to eliminate their carbon emissions.”

The report also says BlackRock supports shareholder proposals that would restrict fossil fuel use and even impact farming and cattle production. It notes that BlackRock still refuses to invest in many coal companies and is being sued by the Texas Attorney General over claims it is working with other firms to limit fossil fuel production.

Jason Isaac, CEO of the American Energy Institute, said in a statement that the 2021 Texas legislation “was designed to protect the livelihoods of millions of Texans and ensure that our capital markets remain accountable to the law rather than to ideologically driven activist campaigns.”

Isaac added that BlackRock’s removal from the boycott list “demonstrates how quickly the commitment to that principle can be undermined when powerful corporations deploy public relations campaigns to obscure their true behavior.”

Isaac further told The Center Square in a statement: “BlackRock never stopped discriminating against American energy companies, it has simply gotten better at disguising it. The evidence shows they still pressure companies to adopt radical net-zero policies, punish directors who don’t comply, and push shareholder demands that would devastate Texas jobs and agriculture. Any action to penalize fossil fuel production is a violation of state law. It’s time policymakers held BlackRock accountable for continuing to weaponize trillions of dollars against the industries that power our economy.”

Texas law defines an energy boycott as any action that harms or limits business with fossil fuel companies based on demands that go beyond existing laws.

The report also notes that BlackRock’s recent exit from some climate groups doesn’t impact how the company pressures fossil fuel producers. BlackRock still participates in these groups through affiliates and keeps similar policies in place, the report said.

The report recommends Texas officials review BlackRock’s actions and consider putting the company back on the boycott list to protect the state’s energy industry.

Hild said he hopes Texas lawmakers take the report seriously and act accordingly.

“Texas has taken a strong position leading the way in pushing back against BlackRock’s abuse of the American economy,” he said. “When they see the truth – that BlackRock is still engaging in that behavior that violates Texas law – we expect them to put the company back on the list.”

“BlackRock may be doing a lot to cozy up to Texas, whether it’s investments in natural gas or the new stock exchange,” he added. “But those aren’t reasons to let them skirt Texas law.”

Agent Stable, New York City Mayor Says Hostile Immigrants Warrant Action

(Chris Wade, The Center Square)  New York City Mayor Eric Adams is calling for violent migrants in the city to be dealt with “quickly and swiftly” following Saturday’s shooting of an off-duty border patrol agent by an “illegal alien” with a lengthy criminal record.

Speaking to reporters on Sunday, Adams commended the U.S. Customs and Border Protection officer who was shot during a botched robbery in a Manhattan park and blasted the nation’s asylum system for allowing “violent migrants and asylum seekers” into the country. Adams said the suspect, 21 year-old Miguel Francisco Mora Nunez of the Dominican Republic, had entered the country illegally in 2023 through Arizona.

Homeland Security, in a release Sunday, said the agent was hospitalized in stable condition.

“We have to be quick and swift to deal with those who believe they want to inflict violence,” Adams, a Democrat, told reporters at a briefing. “The perpetrator – who entered the country illegally and at the time of the shooting had an outstanding bench warrant and was wanted for robbery, felony assault, kidnapping, and weapons possession across multiple states – should have never been on our streets.”

Adams said the suspect in the attack “is exactly who we are talking about when we say we need to work with our federal law enforcement partners to go after violent criminals.”

Homeland Security released a video showing two men on a scooter approaching the unidentified officer and a woman in an Upper Manhattan park. The officer drew his service weapon to defend himself and exchanged gunfire with Nunez, authorities said. Both were shot multiple times. Nunez walked into an area hospital after the shooting, police said. He is being held in custody as authorities search for the second suspect.

Police Commissioner Jessica Tisch told reporters Sunday there was no indication the officer was targeted because of his job. He was in stable condition as of Sunday and is expected to survive, she said.

The attack comes as Homeland Security says threats and assaults on border patrol agents and other federal authorities enforcing immigration law have skyrocketed by nearly 700% over the past year.

Francis Russo, director of field operations for U.S. Customs and Border Protection, called the officer a “hero” and said he helped apprehend a dangerous suspect before he committed other crimes.

“He did exactly what we ask of all of our officers under the circumstances,” Russo told reporters. “He executed our mission, which is to protect the country, and he did it by stopping a threat. If not for his efforts, this person of interest would have committed more armed robberies.”

President Donald Trump took to social media Sunday to praise the officer for his actions and slam former President Joe Biden and other Democrats for failing to crack down on immigration.

“The CBP Officer bravely fought off his attacker, despite his wounds, demonstrating enormous skill and courage,” Trump wrote on social media. “The Democrats have flooded our nation with criminal invaders, and now, they must all be thrown out or, in some cases, immediately prosecuted in that we cannot take a chance that they are able to come back. That’s how evil and dangerous they are!”

Bottom’s Up?

(Brien Lundin, Money Metals News Service) After a couple of weeks away from the markets on a much-needed vacation, I spent last week furiously digging into the metals markets to see if I had missed anything.

I didn’t.

In fact, the metals, aside from some periodic excitement in silver, had been performing just as they typically do during the mid-summer doldrums — simply marking time in anticipation of more interest and, hopefully, higher prices.

Through last week, gold’s sell-offs this summer had been mild with no follow-through. And it had been the same for the rallies, as they failed to spark any upside momentum.

That tight trading range is evident in the one-month chart above. Obviously, this kind of range-trading would entail falling volatility, which prompted me to check in on our chart of gold’s Bollinger bands and their width:

The lower panel tracks the width of the bands and, therefore, the trading volatility. As you can see, the width has collapsed to levels that have previously marked bottoms and imminent rallies.

The timing would be right for another rally as well. In my experience spanning far too many years watching the metals, gold tends to bottom anywhere from mid-July to mid-August.

We’re smack dab in the middle of that time frame at the moment…so I told my subscribers that we would have anywhere from mere hours to a month to take advantage of this summertime lull.

Looks like it may have been just hours for the turn — because gold and silver are rocketing higher today.

Today’s breakout is also clear on that one-month chart above. It’s even more impressive on these daily charts below, showing gold up over $50 and silver jumping $0.75 (apparently on its way to $40 soon).

In response, mining stocks are rocketing higher, with all of the major indices up well over 4% today.

It gets even better for investors in junior mining stocks — and particularly those who subscribe to our service. Many of our picks have more than doubled in value so far this year…and our most recent recommendations are heating up on the launching pad.

If you’re not already a subscriber to our free email newsletter, you can do that by clicking on this link.

I cannot stress it enough: This is the kind of chance we get only rarely in our lives — truly a generational opportunity. Absolute fortunes will be made in the months and years just ahead for those who are positioned for this historic metals and mining bull market.

To get Brien Lundin’s ongoing commentary on the markets at no charge, click here to subscribe to his free Golden Opportunities newsletter.


Brien Lundin is the publisher and editor of Gold Newsletter, the publication that has been the cornerstone of precious metals advisories since 1971. Mr. Lundin covers not only resource stocks but also the entire world of investing. He also hosts the annual New Orleans Investment Conference. To get Brien Lundin’s ongoing commentary on the markets at no charge, click here to subscribe to his free Golden Opportunities newsletter.