Newsom and DeSantis Duke It Out in ‘Red vs. Blue State’ Debate

(Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis and California Gov. Gavin Newsom sparred over every issue brought up during their debate Thursday night hosted by Sean Hannity on Fox News.

DeSantis is fighting to gain ground against former President Donald Trump in the race to be the Republican nominee for president in 2024. Newsom, a Democrat, has made several moves that hint at a presidential run but maintains his support for President Joe Biden as his party’s nominee.

“There are profound difference[s], but there’s one thing that we have in common: neither of us will be the nominee for our party in 2024,” Newsom claimed during the debate.

Many, however, have speculated that the Democratic National Committee could pull a last-minute bait-and-switch during or after its convention next August.

As for DeSantis—whose stock has plunged considerably due to a lackluster, low-energy campaign—his best hope is to be the default choice if Trump becomes ineligible. However, many of the early NeverTrump backers he was counting on have recently flocked to pro-Establishment neocon Nikki Haley instead.

DeSantis opened by saying, “You have to try to mess California up, and yet that is what Gavin Newsom has done since he’s been governor. He’s the first governor to ever lose population. They actually, at one point, ran out of U-Hauls.”

A 2022 report from U-Haul stated their out-migration numbers from California in 2021 would have been higher had they not run short on trucks to meet demand.

Referring to the COVID-19 pandemic, DeSantis said Newsom “imposed restrictions on his own people while exempting himself from those restrictions. He led the country in school closures, locking kids out of school while he had his own kids in private school [receiving in-person instruction].”

Newsom said he was at the debate to “tell the truth about the Biden–Harris record and compare and contrast Ron DeSantis’s records and the Republican Party’s record as a point of contrast that’s as different as daylight and darkness.”

He said DeSantis wants to “reverse” American policies to a pre-1960s era “on voting rights, on civil rights, on LGBTQ rights, on women’s rights—it’s not just access to abortion but also access to contraception.”

He went on to bash DeSantis for what has been one of the governor’s signature issues, his hardline stance in the culture-war struggle against corporations like Disney, which has theme parks in both states and scuttled its plans for a major relocation from California to Florida after clashes with DeSantis over the state’s anti-grooming law for public education.

“You are focusing on false separateness,” Newsom said in his attack on DeSantis.

“You are on a banning binge a cultural purge intimidating and humiliating people you disagree with,” he continued. “You and President Trump are trying to light democracy on fire.”

On the issue of pandemic-era lockdowns, Newsom said DeSantis passed an emergency declaration before California did and closed down Florida beaches and restaurants, which DeSantis refuted.

“You had quarantines, you had checkpoints, all over the state of Florida,” Newsom said. “By the way, I didn’t say that. Donald Trump laid you out on this.”

“That’s not true,” DeSantis countered.

“Why did everyone leave California to come to Florida,” the Republican asked, adding that Newsom’s in-laws even went to his state. “They were coming to Florida because we were open. We were open, you were closed.”

On the issue of the border, DeSantis called it, “déjà vu all over again with that flurry of lies,” referring to Newsom when he stated the administration wasn’t lying to the public about the border.

“Gavin Newsom is lying to you about what it’s going to take to solve this problem,” DeSantis said. “California is a sanctuary state. They thumb their nose at federal immigration law. This has real consequences.”

DeSantis cited an example of an illegal foreign national who was released by Los Angeles authorities who wouldn’t cooperate with ICE. The man in question went on to murder the mother of a 3-year-old.

“California policies do not work,” DeSantis said. “Liberal elites [like Newsom] like to impose burdens on you … who want open borders who lecture everybody else about it. Then the minute they have to deal with any of the consequences, oh man, all hell breaks loose, and they get upset.”

Newsom referenced DeSantis’s program that bused asylum seekers from Texas to different locales, including Martha’s Vineyard and Sacramento, California.

“I’m the only guy here that’s a border state governor,” Newsom said. “You’re trolling folks and trying to find migrants to play political games to get news and attention so you can out-Trump Trump. By the way, how’s that going for you? You’re down 41 points in your own home state.”

DeSantis said the odds that Biden’s border policies have enabled terrorists to enter the U.S. are a certainty.

“Of course, our enemies will take advantage of this,” he said. “Joe Biden is sitting on his hands. He refuses to take care of the border. He refuses to hold the drug cartels accountable. This is the vision of Biden, Harris, Newsom: open borders. There will be a terrorist attack at some point that we’ll be able to trace back to our southern border.”

Newsom countered that “Joe Biden put a $14 billion immigration package in front of Congress,” that lawmakers refused to act on, adding that DeSantis wanted to “demagogue this issue.”

Newsom also said Joe Biden would be the Democratic nominee and “in a matter of weeks, [DeSantis] will be endorsing Donald Trump as the nominee for the Republican Party.”

The governors also sparred over topics including migration from blue to red states, taxation policies, education outcomes, crime rates, and abortion while talking over each other.

Hannity pointed out several times that Newsom refused to answer questions about his record, specifically on the issue of why people were leaving California, higher taxes, worse education outcomes, among others.

Headline USA’s Ben Sellers contributed to this report. 

‘Bullying!’: Santos Issues Final Warning Against Expulsion Vote

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) Rep. George Santos, R-N.Y., embroiled in controversy, is not holding back as the House considers a motion to remove him from office following damning revelations by the House Ethics Committee. 

In a press conference held outside the U.S. Capitol, Santos issued a stark warning against what he labeled as “bullying” tactics by Congress in attempting to expel him from his position.

“It’s just an unfortunate circumstance that I have to sit here and watch … Congress waste the American people’s time over and over again on something that is the power of the people,” Santos said.

“They are trying to join me to the group of three Confederates and two people convicted in a court of law,” he added. 

The controversial lawmaker drew attention to Rep. Jamaal Bowman, D-N.Y., a far-left member of the “Squad,” highlighting the lack of action to remove Bowman after his guilty plea for triggering a fire alarm, seen by many as an attempt to impede a Republican-led stopgap bill from passing.

“We have a member of Congress that earlier this year took a plea deal to obstructing a congressional hearing,” Santos stated regarding Bowman, noting that the New York Democrat took a deal for simply triggering a fire alarm.

Santos cautioned that if any Republican member of Congress had committed what Bowman pleaded guilty to, they would have faced harsher charges.

“Just like the somewhat 140 people sitting in prison right now because of January 6 but Jamal Bowman gets a pass,” Santos added.

“That’s why today at noon I’m going to be introducing a privileged motion for expulsion of convicted and guilty-pleaded Congressman Jamal Bowman and I stand here and I think that that’s consistency,” Santos continued.

The New York Republican faces a Friday vote for expulsion following an Ethics Committee report alleging the illegal use of campaign funds to purchase luxury bags, Botox treatments and a subscription to an adult social media site called OnlyFans. 

The vote, initially slated for Thursday, has been rescheduled to Friday. 

Rand Paul Saves Colleague from Choking w/ Heimlich Maneuver

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., might have saved a colleague from choking during a Thursday lunch in the Senate. 

According to Politico reporter Burgess Everett, Paul rushed to the aid of Sen. Joni Ernst, R-Iowa, after she started choking on some food during their lunch.

Reportedly, the ophthalmologist used the Heimlich maneuver to administer first aid to Ernst. The Iowa senator quickly recovered, joking that she would vote for whatever bill Paul asked for, as per Politico. 

Ernst even took to Twitter, taking a dig at the Democratic Party.

“Can’t help but choke on the woke policies Dems are forcing down our throats. Thanks, Dr. @RandPaul,” she said on Twitter.

Ernst’s remarks were met with some criticism from some Twitter users, who called her response cringe.  

“You’re vile, Senator Ernst,” self-proclaimed political junkie Russell Drew said. “Why not just say thanks instead of attacking Democrats in what was a life and death situation for you. You were probably choking not on woke policies, but GOP bulls*it.” 

Others were thankful Ernst was safe. “Humor is important when dealing with these things, glad you’re okay! Thank you Dr Paul!” one user responded.

According to Politico, this would not be the first time a senator has saved a colleague with the Heimlich maneuver. 

In 2018, Sen. Joe Manchin, R-W.Va., aided former Sen. Claire McCaskill, R-Mo., who also choked on food that year. McCaskill left the Senate after being defeated by Republican challenger Josh Hawley in 2019. 

Hawley’s colleague, Sen. Eric Schmitt R-Mo., who took office in 2023, also received Heimlich assistance during a reported GOP lunch earlier this year.

Omar Rips Dem. Challenger over Comment on Her Looks: ‘Not Cute Enough’

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) Democratic congressional candidate Don Samuels sparked controversy by criticizing Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., for her appearance and attire, suggesting she is “not cute enough” to disregard her constituents. 

In a now-viral interview, Samuels drew attention to Omar’s looks in an analogy that she swiftly denounced as misogynistic.

“To see [the] government not be responsive like that to the people who pay them, it is offensive to me,” Samuels said in a podcast, apparently directing his remarks at Omar.

“And to not be responsive and available to those people? To meet with them and find out what their concerns are and to answer their tough questions? To not get back to people on the phone? Who do you think you are? And who do you think you’re working for? You’re not cute enough, you don’t dress well enough, nothing about you is attractive enough to overcome that deficit,” he added.

In response, Omar took to Twitter on Nov. 28, to condemn Samuels as misogynistic, somehow blaming his comments on former President Donald Trump’s rhetoric. 

“This is beneath the dignity of any adult, let alone someone seeking public office. It is reminiscent of the worst kinds of lies and misogyny that we are hearing from people like Donald Trump, who think they can say anything about women and get away with it,” she claimed.

Samuels, a persistent critic of Omar and former member of the Minneapolis City Council, previously ran against her in 2022, only losing the primary over 2,500 votes.

His decision to challenge Omar in 2024 followed controversies surrounding Omar’s anti-Israel remarks and her unwavering support for Rep. Rashida Tlaib, D-Mich. 

Tlaib faced scorching criticism and a House censure for defending anti-Semitism, including the “From the river to the sea” chant advocating for the destruction of the Jewish state from the Jordanian River to the Mediterranean Sea. 

A donor pledged $20 million on potential support for a Tlaib primary challenger, citing her ties to the disturbing pro-Palestinian protests breaking out across the country amid the Israel-Hamas war. 

Appeals Court Reinstates Gag Order in Trump’s N.Y. Civil Trial

0

(Headline USA) A New York appeals court Thursday reinstated a gag order that barred Donald Trump from commenting about court personnel after the former president repeatedly disparaged a law clerk in his New York civil fraud trial.

The one-sentence decision came two weeks after an individual appellate judge put the gag order on hold while the appeals process played out.

Trial judge Arthur Engoron, who imposed the restriction, said he now planned to enforce it “rigorously and vigorously.”

Trump attorney Christopher Kise called it “a tragic day for the rule of law.”

Steven Cheung, a spokesperson for Trump’s 2024 presidential campaign, said the gag order was “nothing but attempted election interference, which is failing terribly.”

Engoron imposed the gag order Oct. 3 after Trump posted a derogatory comment about the judge’s law clerk, Allison Greenfield, via social media, linking her to Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y. and suggesting the two radical Democrats may be romantically involved.

New York Attorney General Letitia James’s lawsuit lawsuit alleges Trump exaggerated his wealth on financial statements used to secure loans and make deals. Trump denies any wrongdoing. The Republican 2024 front-runner contends the lawsuit is a political attack instigated by James and furthered by Engoron, both Democrats.

Over the trial’s first few weeks, Engoron fined Trump $15,000 for violating the gag order. The judge expanded the order—which initially covered only parties in the case—to include lawyers after Trump’s attorneys questioned Greenfield’s prominent role on the bench. She sits alongside the judge, exchanging notes and advising him during testimony.

Trump’s lawyers sued Engoron, challenging his gag order as an abuse of power. The purpose of gag orders normally is to prevent juries in criminal trials from being unduly influenced, not to protect civil servants involved in a trial from having their feelings hurt.

Naturally, state lawyers on James’s team supported the restriction, saying it was a reasonable step to protect Engoron’s staff. An attorney for the court system tied Trump’s comments to an uptick in nasty calls and messages directed at the judge and law clerk.

A court security captain wrote in a sworn statement last week that Greenfield has been receiving 20-30 calls per day to her personal cell phone and 30-50 messages per day on social media, LinkedIn and two personal email addresses.

The captain reported that Greenfield received enough harassing voicemails to fill a transcript with 275 single-spaced pages, and that about half the harassing and disparaging messages to her were anti-Semitic.

Trump’s lawyers then argued that while messages and calls were “vile and reprehensible,” he shouldn’t be muzzled because of other people’s bad behavior. Trump never called for violence against Greenfield, nor did he or his lawyers ever encourage or condone harassment and threats, the attorneys wrote in a court filing.

They argued that the gag order infringed on his free speech rights.

“As the front-runner for the 2024 Republican presidential nomination and as a citizen on trial, President Trump is well within his rights to comment on what he perceives as bias,” Trump’s lawyers wrote.

While the gag order was suspended, Trump posted about Greenfield as recently as Wednesday, referring to the judge’s “very disturbed and angry law clerk.”

In recent days, Trump also assailed the judge’s family, citing critical social media posts about him that he asserted came from Engoron’s wife. Court system spokesperson Al Baker said Thursday that they did not.

Engoron ruled before the trial that Trump and other defendants engaged in fraud, and he ordered that a receiver take control of some of Trump’s properties, putting their future oversight in question. An appeals court has put that order on hold for now.

The trial concerns remaining claims of conspiracy, insurance fraud and falsifying business records. James is seeking more than $300 million in penalties and a ban on Trump doing business in New York.

Trump is due to testify, for a second time, Dec. 11. All testimony is expected to wrap up shortly afterward.

Then the two sides are due to submit filings and make their closing arguments in January, under a schedule sketched out Thursday.

The verdict in the non-jury case will be up to Engoron, who said he he hopes to reach a decision by the end of January.

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

Biden Spox Abruptly Ends Briefing Amid African Reporter’s Questions

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) Tensions escalated during Thursday’s White House press briefing when Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre abruptly terminated the session after Today News Africa reporter Simon Ateba pressed for a follow-up question, sparking once another contentious exchange. 

Ateba sought to ask National Security Council Spokesperson John Kirby about Angola, but Jean-Pierre appeared disinterested and opted to entertain a different reporter’s query. 

“Can I ask you a follow-up on Angola,” Ateba asked with no success. Expressing surprise at being skipped, Ateba protested, “It is so surprising that you don’t take — you are receiving an African leader, but you can’t take a question from an African journalist.”

Responding to Ateba, Jean-Pierre threatened, “OK, we can end this briefing right now,” she clapped back. “We can end this briefing if it’s not going to be respectful here.” 

Undeterred, Ateba persisted, highlighting his initial Angola question, “You are receiving an African leader, and you don’t take a question,” before Jean-Pierre left the briefing. 

This incident adds to a series of clashes between Ateba and Jean-Pierre. In August 2023, Ateba filed a federal lawsuit against the Biden administration after the revocation of his press credential, along with those of 440 other reporters, effectively limiting their access to the press room, as argued by the Center for American Liberty.

“After months of not receiving answers to his inquiries from the White House press office, Mr. Ateba chose to utilize the only option available to him: speaking up during press briefings,” the lawsuit cited. 

Notably, conflicts between Ateba and Jean-Pierre date back to last year. In a press conference on Nov. 22, 2022, Jean-Pierre scolded Ateba for probing into the origins of COVID-19, stating, “Simon, I’m done. I’m done with you right now.”

In January 2023, Ateba questioned Jean-Pierre’s suitability for the role due to her reluctance to address pressing questions.

Later, in a disconcerting revelation, the White House was caught editing exchanges between Jean-Pierre and Ateba from their YouTube livestream, seemingly attempting to conceal the confrontational exchange.

Texas Judge Rips into Biden’s Handling of Border in Dispute over Razor Wire

(Headline USA) Border Patrol agents for now can cut razor wire that Texas installed on the U.S.–Mexico border under a judge’s ruling that also took President Joe Biden’s administration to task for its handling of immigration enforcement.

The ruling is at least a temporary defeat for Texas officials who say Border Patrol agents have repeatedly cut, damaged and moved some of the roughly 30 miles of concertina wire the state installed near the border city of Eagle Pass, where large numbers of illegal immigrants have crossed in recent months.

U.S. District Judge Alia Moses, an appointee of former President George W. Bush, initially issued an emergency order in October that prevented agents from cutting razor wire in Eagle Pass, except in emergencies. On Wednesday, however, she ruled that the state hadn’t met the requirements to issue a wider preliminary injunction.

At the same time, she said razor wire has proved to be effective at deterring migrants elsewhere along Texas’s 1,200-mile southern border.

“The law may be on the side of the Defendants and compel a resolution in their favor today, but it does not excuse their culpable and duplicitous conduct,” Moses wrote. “The evidence presented amply demonstrates the utter failure of the Defendants to deter, prevent, and halt unlawful entry into the United States.”

On Thursday, Texas filed an appeal with the conservative-leaning 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

“I am disappointed that the federal government’s blatant and disturbing efforts to subvert law and order at our State’s border with Mexico will be allowed to continue,” Republican Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton said in a statement.

Border Patrol agents are allowed to cut the wire in emergencies, such as when a migrant on the other side needs medical assistance. But Texas officials have argued that federal agents also were cutting it to help groups crossing illegally through the river before taking them in for processing. Moses said Texas failed to prove the wire cutting was a formal policy.

Spokespersons for U.S. Customs and Border Protection did not immediately return an email seeking comment Thursday.

Texas also has installed razor wire around El Paso and the Rio Grande Valley, where migrants have also crossed in high numbers. But the barrier has drawn the sharpest criticism in Eagle Pass, where some state troopers have raised concerns over the multiple injuries caused by razor wire.

According to Moses’s 34-page ruling, the Biden administration produced documents that reflected how the wire “inhibits Border Patrol’s ability to patrol the border.”

The documents went on to state that while Texas troopers and federal agents have coordinated in the past when it comes to the concertina wire, the “relationship has deteriorated over time.”

Eagle Pass is a hub of Republican Gov. Greg Abbott’s massive border mission known as Operation Lone Star. He has also authorized installing floating barriers in the Rio Grande near Eagle Pass and allowed troopers to arrest and jail thousands of migrants on trespassing charges.

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

Mich. Dems Pass Raft of Fishy Voting Rules, Including Registering 16-Yr.-Olds, Felons

(Headline USA) In an effort to outdo themselves, corrupt Michigan Democrats who last presidential election cycle ignored their own state legislature and constitution by allowing massive mail-in balloting are advancing even more dubious voting policies that will muddy the waters of election integrity.

That includes allowing 16-year-olds to register before they can legally vote ahead of a 2024 presidential election that the swing state could play a critical role in.

The election bills package, signed Thursday by George Soros-backed Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, also includes legislation that will automatically register individuals to vote when they are released from incarceration. Michigan is the first state in the nation to implement such legislation, according to the anti-integrity activist group Voters Not Politicians.

“This groundbreaking step will cement Michigan as a voting rights leader and ensure every eligible voter can participate in our democratic process,” Kim Murphy–Kovalick, programs director for Voters Not Politicians, said in a statement.

The package is the result of Michigan Democrats prioritizing their securing of permanent majorities after the party flipped both chambers of the Legislature and kept control of the governor’s office last year.

In July, the state extended its pandemic-era rules changes with laws requiring at least nine days of early in-person voting—a direct violation of the U.S. Constitution, which sets Election Day as the first Tuesday in November.

Earlier this month, Whitmer signed legislation to no longer make it a misdemeanor for individuals to pay for rides to polling locations through apps such as Uber and Lyft. Michigan election law had previously stated that “a person shall not hire a motor vehicle” to take them to vote unless they could not walk.

Several Republican lawmakers argued against the legislation, saying that a voter could be influenced while on the ride.

The changes precede a 2024 presidential election that could once again hinge on the results of Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania—three swing states that were critical to President Joe Biden’s 2020 win and also critical to President Donald Trump’s victory before that.

All three were subject to rampant allegations of vote fraud in the 2020 election due to the Democrat governors’ exploitation of the pandemic to disregard voting laws. Many of those illegal rules changes, however, have since been codified as the state laws or the de-facto norms.

Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson, who is equally corrupt and also funded by Soros, praised the legislation signed in Detroit, saying it was a “great step into the 2024 election cycle where we will be prepared for all the bullies who are going to show up on our doorstep.”

The package also promises to have a chilling effect on GOP efforts to push back or challenge any of the dubious practices that corrupt voting officials engage in, either behind closed doors or in plain sight by threatening to punish those who try to hold them accountable.

An individual who intimidates an election official “with the specific intent of interfering with the performance of that election official’s election related duties,” could be punished with a misdemeanor for the first two violations and a felony for the third violation, according to the law.

About 1 in 5 election workers know someone who left their election job for safety reasons and 73% of local election officials said harassment has increased since 2020, according to a Brennan Center survey published in April.

“We’re here today to protect the people who protect democracy,” Benson claimed at the signing.

Democrats have frequently used “democracy” as a euphemism for unilaterally securing their own political power, which, technically speaking, is the exact opposite.

Michigan will also join 16 states and the District of Columbia in allowing 16-year-olds to preregister to vote before they turn 18, according to a House Fiscal Agency analysis. Supporters hope the new legislation will increase young voter turnout and alleviate wait times due to last-minute registration.

However, it is likely to create further confusion of those who still are not eligible to vote on Election Day wind up receiving mail-in ballots and attempting to do so. It is unclear what the criminal consequences will be for ineligible 17-year-olds who submit ballots that they receive in the mail.

Michigan allows people to register to vote on Election Day, which prompted such long lines on college campuses in 2022 that the last ballot cast at the University of Michigan came at 2:05 a.m.

Starting in June 2025, the Michigan Secretary of State’s office will be required to coordinate with the state Department of Corrections to ensure that eligible individuals are automatically registered to vote, with the opportunity to decline the voter registration, on release from incarceration.

The governor also signed bills aimed at curbing deceptive uses of artificial intelligence and manipulated media. Campaigns on the state and federal level will be required to clearly say which political advertisements airing in Michigan are created using artificial intelligence. In addition, the use of AI-generated deepfakes within 90 days of an election will be prohibited without a separate disclosure identifying the media as manipulated.

Deepfakes are fake media that misrepresent someone as doing or saying something they didn’t. They’re created using generative artificial intelligence, a type of AI that can create convincing images, videos or audio clips in seconds.

There are increasing concerns that generative AI will be used in the 2024 presidential race to mislead voters, impersonate candidates and undermine elections on a scale and at a speed not yet seen.

However, for corrupt politicians like Whitmer—or gaffe-prone ones like President Joe Biden—deepfakes could offer a convenient excuse by lending plausible deniability to any real comments that the individual makes. That is likely the true reason that Democrats are so keen to regulate them.

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

Ariz. County GOP Officials Who Refused to Certify Shady 2022 Election Are Indicted

(Headline USA) Officials in a rural Arizona county who delayed canvassing the 2022 general election results have been criminally charged, the state’s top prosecutor said Wednesday.

A grand jury in Maricopa County Superior Court has indicted Cochise County supervisors Peggy Judd and Tom Crosby on one count each of conspiracy and interference of an election officer.

“The repeated attempts to undermine our democracy are unacceptable,” Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes, a Democrat, said in a statement.

“I took an oath to uphold the rule of law, and my office will continue to enforce Arizona’s elections laws and support our election officials as they carry out the duties and responsibilities of their offices,” Mayes dubiously claimed, despite widespread concerns that the Democrat was weaponizing the justice system against political opponents.

Arizona’s elections were highly irregular in 2022 after reports of long voter lines in Maricopa County due to malfunctioning machines. Then Secretary of State Katie Hobbs, the Democrat official overseeing the election, was also the gubernatorial candidate who stood to gain the most from the fiasco.

Maricopa officials took an exceedingly long time to count the ballots after most other states had completed their counts. And in Cochise County and elsewhere, razor-thin margins also made the difference between Mayes’s disputed victory and that of GOP candidate Abe Hamadeh.

Ultimately, it was the threats of legal action that forced the candidates to certify the election under duress for Mayes and Hobbs.

Dennis Wilenchik, an attorney for Crosby, called the indictment “nothing but political partisanship.” In a statement, he promised a vigorous defense for what he called baseless charges.

“The conspiracy is solely based on an alleged ‘agreement’ to interfere that is nonexistent, as there was none,” said Wilenchik, who also referred to the interference charge as “nonsensical.”

Judd did not respond to requests via text and email for comment.

Jane Montgomery, spokesperson for Cochise County, declined to comment. She confirmed both supervisors will be responsible for their own legal representation.

The indictment marks a rare instance of criminally prosecuting people connected to the vote canvassing being dragged out last year in six Arizona counties.

In December 2022, Cochise County certified election results only after a judge ruled Crosby and Judd, both Republicans, were breaking the law by refusing to sign off on the vote count by the deadline.

Crosby and Judd said they weren’t satisfied that the machines used to tabulate ballots were properly certified for use in elections. This prompted lawsuits including one from Hobbs.

After the judge’s order, Judd joined Ann English, the lone Democrat on the three-member board, in voting to certify the election. Crosby did not attend that meeting.

Judd and Crosby both were subpoenaed to court earlier this month. English was not subpoenaed or indicted.

At the time, Judd and Crosby told the Associated Press they had no idea why they were being subpoenaed. Crosby was shocked.

“I don’t feel like I broke a law. But, obviously the courts had different feelings,” Judd said.

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

Biden Brags About Being Able to ‘Blow Up the World’

(Headline USA) President Joe Biden bizarrely bragged about being able to “blow up the world” with his nuclear code during a visit to Colorado this week, according to the New York Post.

Biden was touring South Korean company CS Wind’s factory in Pueblo, Colorado when he made the comment: 

“This is not nuclear weapons, is it?” Biden asked nearby factor workers. “Now, look, my Marine carries that, but it has the code to blow up the world.”

The 81-year-old president then went on to give a bumbling, 23-minute speech, in which he made numerous gaffes.

“I am friends with your leader, Mr. Moon, you know,” Biden said, appearing to refer to former South Korean President Moon Jae-in, who left office in 2022.

The current South Korean president, Yoon Suk Yeol, has interacted with Biden at many events—including the administration’s second state dinner in April, where Yoon was honored.

In images of the visit, the plant workers appeared, for the most part, to be American.

Biden then mistakenly referred to former President Donald Trump as a congressman while trying to attack Rep. Lauren Boebert, R-Colo.

“We can use [a billionaire minimum tax] to strengthen the Social Security and Medicare system instead of cutting them like Congressman Trump and Boebert want to do,” Biden said.

At another point in his speech, Biden claimed to have “cut the federal deficit by over $7 billion” even though his administration has continued to increase spending every year since he took office.

The frequent gaffes are sure to increase voters’ concerns about the president’s age and mental acuity. Already, 71% of swing-state voters say Biden is “too old to be an effective president,” according to a New York Times poll released this month.

Even top Democrats have warned that Biden’s age is a problem, with former senior Obama adviser David Axelrod warning that the more Biden is in front of the camera, the bigger the problem will become.

“In front of the camera, what he’s projecting is causing people concerns, and that is worrisome,” Axelrod said.