Treasury Sec. Yellen, Worth Millions, Downplays Rising Grocery Prices

(Headline USA) Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen this week downplayed the sharp increase in grocery prices over the past few years, arguing she is not “surprised” by them.

Yellen commented during an interview with Yahoo Finance’s Jennifer Schonberger on Monday after being asked whether she’s seen the recent grocery price increases firsthand.

“I sure have – I go every week,” Yellen replied.

Schonberger then asked Yellen whether she gets “sticker shock,” since “food prices still remain high.”

Yellen, who is worth an estimated $20 million, gave a sharp answer before Schonberger could even finish her question.

“No,” Yellen said, going on to claim that any food price increases are the result of “cost increases, including labor cost increases that grocery firms have experienced, although there may be some increases in margins.”

She then insisted that inflation is still coming down and that it will “go back to the Fed’s 2% target” by early next year.

The Biden official also claimed she has met with several grocery store CEOs in an effort to get them to cut costs for necessities, such as bread, milk, and diapers.

Yellen isn’t the only one in the Biden administration to downplay inflation’s effects. President Joe Biden himself has repeatedly dismissed Americans’ concerns about rising prices, arguing last month that Americans “have the money to spend.”

He has also denied that his administration’s policies have affected inflation.

“No president’s had the run we’ve had in terms of creating jobs and bringing down inflation. It was 9% percent when I came to office, 9%,” he told CNN in May. “I think inflation has gone slightly up. It was at 9% when I came in, and it’s now down around 3%.”

Inflation in January 2021, when Biden first took office, was 1.4%. It went on to peak at 9$ in June 2022, after Biden had been president for more than 16 months.

FBI Allowed to Keep Epstein Documents Secret, Judge Rules

(Ken Silva, Headline USA) A federal judge ruled on Tuesday that the FBI is allowed to keep its records about accused sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein secret because there’s a risk that his co-conspirator, Ghislaine Maxwell, could go back to trial.

The plaintiff seeking the Epstein records, news outlet Radar Online, filed its Freedom of Information Act request in 2017, about two years before Epstein allegedly killed himself in prison. Maxwell went to trial in 2021 and was found guilty on sex-trafficking charges, and she has an appeal pending.

Even though the Justice Department presented its evidence against Maxwell publicly at her trial, the FBI argued that there’s much more evidence that wasn’t made public. Making that evidence public now could influence witness testimony ahead of a potential second trial, the FBI argued.

“Because the majority of the records in this category were not introduced as public exhibits during Maxwell’s first trial, they remain non-public, though the Government may still seek to introduce them should Maxwell be granted a retrial,” argued DOJ lawyer Maurene Comey, the daughter of former FBI Director James Comey.

“The premature release of these materials could influence the testimony of witnesses by providing the opportunity for witnesses to shape their testimony to conform with other evidence gathered during the investigation, including both records and witness statements.”

The plaintiff, Radar Online, had pushed back against this argument. Most records were already provided to Maxwell during her pretrial proceedings, and the likelihood of her having a new trial after a jury conviction is slim, the outlet argued.

Now, with Maxwell convicted after a month-long public trial, there is even less basis to credit the FBI’s unsupported concerns of interference,” the outlet argued.

“What records has Ghislaine Maxwell not already seen? What potential jury member (or witness) could possibly be affected by the release of the requested records at this point?”

However, the judge sided with the FBI in his Tuesday order. In granting the summary judgment for the FBI, the judge ordered the roughly seven-year case to be closed, too.

Meanwhile, Maxwell has been moved to the  “honor dorm” of a low-security prison in Tallahassee, according to a March report in the Daily Mail.

Investigative reporter Nick Bryant noted that the honor dorm is typically reserved for prisoners who are just about to be released.

Maxwell’s lawyers are contesting her conviction on five charges of recruiting and grooming four underage girls for the late financier to abuse between 1994 and 2004.

Maxwell’s lawyers reportedly told New York’s Second Circuit appeals court this week that she should not have been prosecuted for grooming Epstein’s victims because of a provision in his 2008 sweetheart plea deal.

Ken Silva is a staff writer at Headline USA. Follow him at twitter.com/jd_cashless.

The Vast Majority of Professional Investors Own Some Gold

(Mike Maharrey, Money Metals News Service) Despite the generally negative attitude toward gold you hear in the mainstream financial media, the vast majority of professional investors in North America own gold and the number has been growing in recent years.

A World Gold Council survey of 525 North American investors found a steadily growing trend of gold ownership. The survey included large institutions, consultants, and financial advisors.

In 2018, 69 percent of the survey respondents said they had some allocation to gold. In the most recent survey, 85 percent reported owning some gold.

Given all of the negative talk we hear about gold in the financial media, this seems like an exceptionally high number. But digging in deeper, we find that just over a quarter of the investors who reported owning gold hold less than 1 percent of assets under management in the yellow metal.

About half of the respondents said they held at least 1 percent of their portfolio in gold. About 24 percent have an allocation of 3 percent or more.

Over one-quarter of respondents said they plan to increase gold allocations in the next 12 to 18 months. That was more than double the number who said they plan to reduce their exposure to gold.

According to the World Gold Council, “At the aggregate level, North American investors seem likely to increase their allocations to gold over the year ahead. We recently flagged that gold is historically under-owned in the U.S., signaling the potential for headroom and supporting a positive outlook for gold ownership.” 

The reasons these investors reported holding gold include its role as a portfolio diversifier and as a hedge against inflation. They also reported that they believe holding gold decreases portfolio risk.  

Gold’s role as a “proven diversifier, especially in periods of financial turmoil and economic uncertainty” was the most commonly cited reason for increasing gold allocations with 46 percent of the sample choosing it as one of their top three reasons for holding gold. 

But the survey revealed that professional investors aren’t aware of gold’s solid long-term returns. Sixty percent of the respondents said gold tends to deliver less than sparkling returns compared to other asset classes.

In fact, gold has outperformed most asset classes over the last 25 years. In fact, with an average 8 percent return each year, gold has outperformed equities over the last quarter century. 

About 21 percent of the survey respondents acknowledged that gold delivers “excellent” comparative long-term returns. 

According to the survey, a lot of professional investors also fail to grasp gold’s liquidity. Just under half of respondents agreed that gold is a liquid asset. Almost a quarter of respondents with no gold holdings cited liquidity as a barrier to investing in gold.

Again, the perception doesn’t match up with reality. In fact, the gold market is more liquid than several major financial markets, including the euro/yen and the Dow Jones Industrial Average. The trading volume for gold averaged approximately $163 billion per day in 2023. 

One of the things that makes gold so liquid is the fact that it is valued around the world. Whether you go to Europe, Asia, or South America, people recognize gold as a store of value. You will never be left without a buyer if you want to sell gold.

The survey shows that there are plenty of misconceptions about gold within the investment community, but despite the generally negative messaging in the financial media, most professional investors in North America do recognize the value of holding at least a small amount of gold within their portfolios.


Mike Maharrey is a journalist and market analyst for MoneyMetals.com with over a decade of experience in precious metals. He holds a BS in accounting from the University of Kentucky and a BA in journalism from the University of South Florida.

SELLERS: What I Learned Behind the Scenes at ZeroHedge’s Immigration Debate

(Ben Sellers, Headline USA) It’s a humbling feeling to spend two hours in a room where the person with the next smallest Twitter following is running for president of the United States.

Granted, Chase Oliver’s biggest obstacles may have been overcoming the threat of perennial candidate Vermin Supreme, explaining to Donald Trump at the Libertarian National Convention that Deroy Murdock wasn’t really the best representative of the party’s core principles, and enduring the looks of disappointment from those expecting to see Giant Gay Bong clinch the nomination.

Oliver was one of several marquee names to participate in ZeroHedge’s livestreamed “Border Debate” at its Washington, D.C., studio space on Wednesday.

After receiving an invitation to sit in on the debate behind the scenes and cover it for Headline USA, I jumped at the opportunity.

In addition to Oliver (who beat out the aforementioned Supreme, as well as Trump and Robert F. Kennedy Jr., to receive the Libertarian Party nod for president), Reason magazine editor Robby Soave represented what might be characterized as a more “moderate” (in his own words) pro-immigration stance from the libertarian Right.

Arguing the pro-border-security perspectives were Human Events editor Jack Posobiec (whose 2.5 million Twitter followers far eclipsed everyone else in the room combined—and who was also live-tweeting the debate while participating in it), as well as Ryan Girdusky, a political consultant and author of the national populist newsletter, who did his homework ahead of the debate and showed up loaded for bear.

While it touched on a full range of immigration-related topics, from the economic benefits (or lack thereof) to cultural concerns to national security issues—even bringing up the question of whether the U.S should strategically target drug cartels in Mexico or whether that would be considered an act of war—the participants’ positions were encapsulated, simply enough, in the opening and closing statements that each offered:

  • Oliver said the underlying objective in his policies was to facilitate immigration, with the focus of border security being on screening out only dangerous illegals. He argued that more immigration was key to greater growth, suggesting that the wave of early 20th-century immigrants who arrived from Ellis Island had fueled America’s industrial revolution (to which Girdusky pointed out that the nation’s earlier, agrarian iteration was more in line with libertarian values and the wave of European immigrants had likely imported socialist attitudes when they arrived).

  • Soave was less intent on arguing the economic benefits of immigration, but he did maintain that the cost associated with reversing the Biden administration’s open-border crisis through Republican candidate Donald Trump’s mass-deportation plan was not only infeasible but a poor use of resources in comparison to other priorities, such as incarcerating criminals within the U.S., regardless of nationality. Soave continued to cite a cost of $1 trillion to deport the estimated 20 million illegals, saying he would rather see it spent elsewhere.
  • Girdusky borrowed a famous phrase used in a bygone era by Bill and Hillary Clinton to refer to abortion, saying that immigration should be “safe, legal and rare.” He argued that the ideal policy would be “net-zero” immigration, in which each immigrant brought into the country replaced one who left or died. By keeping the rate low and demanding the best of the best, the country could ensure that immigrants brought value, culturally and economically, while also assimilating into the national identity and reassuring Republicans that the Biden border policy was more than simply a Great Replacement strategy to import Democrat voters in order to flip states like Texas permanently blue. (Oliver countered that the idea that immigrants inherently gravitated toward Democrat values amounted to little more than a “Republican marketing problem.”)
  • Posobiec poignantly sought to emphasize the impact that immigration had on innocent crime victims, yielding the balance of his opening time in memory of several young girls and women who were violently murdered at the hands of illegals.

Both he and Girdusky agreed that a recent proposal by Trump to grant green cards to foreign graduates of U.S. schools was a poorly conceived plan that would turn today’s diploma mills into hubs for foreigners seeking a fast track to citizenship.

Attempting a thorough summary of the full two-hour debate (the length of which caught even several of the participants off guard) would be too mammoth an undertaking for a single article. However, many more highlights have since surfaced on the participants’ social-media accounts, and ZeroHedge itself compiled an article with several memorable highlights.

Posobiec lamented afterward that there was not an opportunity for the two moderators—CounterPoints co-hosts Emily Jashinsky and Ryan Grim—to respond to user-submitted commentary from the various feeds on Twitter, YouTube and Rumble where the livestream was broadcast.

Despite what appeared at times to be a heated conversation on camera, the apparent cordiality and jocular banter behind the scenes left me with the impression that the media personalities present had much more in common with one another—a shared set of mutual experiences on the punditry circuit—than their broad diversity of opinions would suggest.

They dished gossip about a certain member of Congress having too many drinks and too many wedding engagements. And Oliver offered his candid opinion that the “Become Ungovernable” banner, which notably hung onstage at the libertarian convention last month, gave off a “Limp Bizkit ’99” vibe, acknowledging that most of those in the room were millennials of a certain age.

While it was a privilege to spend time in such company, the relative inadequacy of my paltry 740 738 Twitter followers undoubtedly marked me as an interloper.

Thus, it was to my great relief to hear that there was another spectator—Posobiec’s brother Kevin, a carpenter who was catching the train down from Pennsylvania.

Little did I know that Kevin also had a following of 20,000 on social media.

Ben Sellers is the editor of Headline USA. Follow him at twitter.com/realbensellers.

Newsom Abandons Sacramento for Exclusive Marin County

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) In a potential display of leftist hypocrisy, California Gov. Gavin Newsom is moving his family from Sacramento to the affluent and exclusive Marin County, Politico reported on Wednesday. 

Newsom justified the move by citing his daughter’s attendance at a private school with a $60,000 annual tuition. His three other children will also relocate. 

The governor and his wife, Jennifer Siebel Newsom, will continue to partially reside in the state’s capital. According to Politico, the Newsoms’ oldest daughter, Montana, is set to attend The Branson School. 

“To ensure continuity in their children’s education, the family will split their time between Sacramento and Marin heading into the coming academic year,” Newsom spokesperson Izzy Gardon claimed in a statement. 

Newsom owns a six-bedroom mansion in Sacramento worth $4.5 million, Politico reported. However, this pales in comparison to Marin County, one of the wealthiest counties in the U.S., reported the New York Post. 

Both Gavin and Jennifer Newsom grew up in Marin County and raised their children there before Newsom won the California governorship in 2018. 

The move coincides with warnings from Sacramento Sergeant Mark Scurria about a possible spike in crime during the summer. 

“With the warm weather, people like getting out and enjoying the city and what it has to offer. You see a small spike in crimes of opportunity, car break-ins or a lot of times, it has to do with intoxication,” Scurria said in an interview with CBS News Sacramento. “As a department, we try to be aware of that.” 

Politico also reported that Newsom’s move could hint at potential aspirations beyond his current term as governor, which ends in 2027. 

Newsom has long been rumored as a potential contender for the Democratic nomination should an emergency incapacitate President Joe Biden.

He has also emerged as a potential favorite for the Democratic presidential nomination in 2028, likely surpassing Vice President Kamala Harris, an unpopular Democrat who has not risen to the occasion of the vice presidency. 

Rep. Luna Gives Garland Until Friday to Comply w/ Subpoena

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, R-Fla., announced that nine lawmakers have joined her effort to hold Attorney General Merrick Garland in “inherent contempt” of Congress, giving him until Friday to comply with a subpoena for an audio recording of President Joe Biden. 

“It’s important to note that when an individual is called before courts across the country they appear why should the attorney general, who is supposed to be head of all law enforcement authorities, [be treated] any different,” Luna said on a Wednesday press conference.

Joining Luna were Reps. Derrick Van Orden, R-Wis.; Mark Alford, R-Mo.; Ben Cline, R-Va.; Russell Fry, R-S.C.; Rich McCormick, R-Ga.; Harriet Hageman, R-Wyo.; Tim Burchett, R-Tenn.; Max Miller, R-Ohio, and Dan Crenshaw, R-Texas.

“Garland still has time to comply with this request,” she added. “We are asking that he brings the tapes to the House and let us listen to them, but in the event that he does not, we will press forward with calling the privilege motion on inherent contempt to the floor on Friday morning.”

The battle began in February when House Republicans subpoenaed the audio of Biden’s deposition with Special Counsel Robert Hur, who was appointed to investigate the president’s mishandling of classified documents. 

Hur ultimately decided not to prosecute Biden, citing concerns about Biden’s age and his ability to persuade a potential jury of his innocence.  

Republicans argue that the audio could provide insight into whether the president is fit to govern. 

Despite public interest in the audio, the DOJ suggested Biden cite executive privilege over the potentially damaging materials. Tellingly, Biden has conveniently used such privilege to shield the audio from public release. 

In response to this defiance, Congress held Garland in contempt, a charge the DOJ has previously used against former Trump White House officials Steve Bannon and Peter Navarro. Navarro is currently serving a federal prison term for these charges. 

If Garland does not comply with the subpoena and the House holds him in inherent contempt, the House Sergeant-at-Arms could detain Garland in Congress until he fulfills the subpoena’s requirements.

Luna’s colleagues were equally vocal in their remarks against Garland:

 

 

 

 

Squad’s Funeral-like Reactions Over Bowman Defeat: ‘Dedicated His Life to Teaching’

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) The radical “Squad” of the House of Representatives is mourning the primary loss of one of its own. 

On Tuesday, fed-up Democratic voters in New York’s 16th Congressional District ousted Rep. Jamaal Bowman by electing George Latimer, a Hillary Clinton-endorsed candidate who supports Israel.

The next day, several Squad members took to Twitter to mourn Bowman’s defeat, with rhetoric that echoed statements typically heard at a funeral. 

Leading the pack was Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., who posted an almost poem-like tribute to lament Bowman’s electoral defeat.

“Son of a single mother. Grew up in public housing. Dedicated his life to teaching. Became a school principal. Founded a prized school to serve Bronx youth. Elected as the 1st Black Congressman for NY16. Never took a dime in corporate money,” she tweeted.

“A true public servant,” Ocasio-Cortez added, also sharing a photo of herself with Bowman. 

Echoing Ocasio-Cortez’s sentiments, Rep. Cori Bush, D-Mo., wrote, “My brother-in-service is the true representation of transformational leadership.” 

Rep. Ayanna Pressley, D-Mass., shared a photo of herself with Bowman, writing, “[Bowman] has always & will always work for the PEOPLE. He’s got our back & we’ve still got his.” 

Rep. Delia Ramirez, D-Ill., a lesser-known Squad member, tweeted, “Thank you [Bowman] for speaking truth to power and for your courageous and moral leadership. Thank you for all you do for our communities and for your unwavering commitment to advance our working people’s agenda.”

As reported by the Associated Press, Latimer secured 58.4% of the votes to Bowman’s 41.6%. While Latimer still needs to win the general election, the district is a Democratic stronghold, making his victory in November almost certain. 

Central to Bowman’s loss were his disturbing positions against Israel, including questioning fact-based reports that Hamas committed mass rape against Israeli women on Oct. 7, the same day the terrorist group killed 1,200 people in southern Israel. 

Bowman became one of the first lawmakers to call for a ceasefire following the terror attack, a position that echoed the wishes of Hamas. 

The leftist Democrat also pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor charge after pulling a false fire alarm as Congress debated a funding bill. 

Bowman is the first Squad member to be voted out of office since its emergence in 2018. 

DNC Busted Pouring Millions into Law Firms Behind Trump ‘Lawfare’

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) The Democratic National Committee (DNC) has funneled several million dollars to law firms at the center of the “lawfare” campaign against former President Donald Trump, the Daily Caller reported on Tuesday. 

The DNC paid roughly $2 million, earmarked as “legal services,” to Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP, a law firm founded by Roberta A. Kaplan, the Caller reported, according to Federal Election Commission’s reports.  

Kaplan is the attorney who represented E. Jean Carroll in her harassment and defamation lawsuits against Trump. Notably, the DNC payments to Kaplan’s firm began just two years after Carroll launched her assault and defamation lawsuits against Trump. 

The DNC also directed several million dollars to Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, the firm behind several anti-Trump amicus briefs in his Supreme Court case against Special Counsel Jack Smith. 

Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP’s connections to the Democratic Party extend beyond the Carroll lawsuits. Partner Joshua Matz served as counsel for the Democratic-led House Judiciary Committee during Trump’s impeachments. 

Similarly, the payments to Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP began in 2021. Several attorneys from the firm subsequently secured high-profile positions in the federal government, according to the Caller and the National Law Journal.

Embattled DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas led the law firm’s coronavirus task force. Brian Boynton, a former government and regulatory partner, now serves as the DOJ’s principal deputy assistant attorney general.

Jonathan Cedarbaum, a former co-leader of Wilmer’s False Claims Act practice, served as a deputy counsel to Biden and National Security Council legal advisor from January 2021 to February 2022, according to his LinkedIn profile. 

Danielle Conley, who led Wilmer’s anti-discrimination practice, is now Biden’s deputy counsel in the White House Counsel’s Office. 

Mike Davis, a legal adviser to Trump and founder of the Article III Project, criticized the DNC’s relationship with these law firms. 

“There is now clear and explosive evidence that the Biden DNC is paying Democrat law firms to engage in this unprecedented lawfare and election interference against President Trump,” Davis said.

Several conservative leaders issued damning reactions to the Caller’s findings:

 

 

Feds Bust Sinaloa Cartel Associates, Chinese-Linked Money Launderers in California

(Bethany Blankley, The Center Square) Another federal case highlights how Mexican cartel operatives in the U.S. are partnering with the Chinese underworld to traffic illicit drugs and launder the proceeds.

The Justice Department announced the result of a multi-year investigation after the DEA uncovered a partnership among Mexican Sinaloa Cartel associates operating in Los Angeles and a Chinese criminal syndicate operating in Los Angeles and China.

The Sinaloa Cartel and Chinese operatives are largely responsible for the recent massive influx of fentanyl into the U.S., The Center Square has reported. After receiving fentanyl precursors from China, cartel operatives make the illicit drugs in Mexico and then orchestrate their smuggling and trafficking into the U.S. Drug proceeds, weapons, stolen vehicles, and other contraband are then smuggled south across the border, law enforcement officials have explained to The Center Square.

One way to launder large sums of cash in U.S. currency is to use Chinese underground money exchanges established in the U.S., federal agents have found.

The DOJ recently unsealed indictments of 24 defendants on counts of conspiracy to aid and abet the distribution of cocaine and methamphetamine, to launder monetary instruments, and to operate an unlicensed money-transmitting business.

The multi-agency investigation found that from October 2019 to October 2023, Sinaloa Cartel operatives in California imported large quantities of narcotics, including fentanyl, cocaine, and methamphetamine from Mexico, generating $50 million in U.S. cash.

In January 2021, the lead defendant, Edgar Joel Martinez-Reyes, 45, of East Los Angeles, allegedly traveled to Mexico to meet Sinaloa members to make a deal with money remitters linked to a Chinese underground banking system to launder drug trafficking proceeds in the U.S. Cartel members then distributed cocaine, methamphetamine, and other narcotics, generating U.S. dollars as drug proceeds, according to the indictment.

They then delivered hundreds of thousands of U.S. dollars in cash to a San Gabriel Valley-based money-transmitting group with links to Chinese underground banking. Drug proceeds were allegedly processed in the Los Angeles area, concealed, and made accessible to cartel members in Mexico and elsewhere.

The organizations also allegedly helped Chinese nationals evade China’s currency controls, according to the investigation. Currently, the Chinese government prohibits its citizens from transferring the equivalent of more than $50,000 per year out of China. Chinese nationals have been able to circumvent the law by using U.S. currency brokers and Chinese underground money exchanges in the U.S. that charge a fee to conceal the nature and source of the funds, the DOJ explains.

“Drug traffickers increasingly have partnered with Chinese to take advantage of the large demand for U.S. dollars from Chinese nationals. The funds that are transferred in China are then used to pay for goods purchased by businesses and organizations in Mexico … needed to aid the drug trafficking organization to manufacture illegal drugs, such as precursor chemicals, including fentanyl,” the DOJ said in a statement.

The money laundering scheme also involved purchasing real or personal property, including luxury goods and cars to be shipped to China. Drug proceeds were also laundered through cryptocurrency transactions, purchasing cashier’s checks, or depositing small amounts at a time into newly opened bank accounts, according to the indictment.

After being indicted, some defendants fled the U.S. Recently, Chinese and Mexican law enforcement authorities working with the DOJ arrested some of them. Twenty defendants are expected to be arraigned in the U.S. District Court in Los Angeles in the coming weeks.

“Relentless greed, the pursuit of money, is what drives the Mexican drug cartels that are responsible for the worst drug crisis in American history,” DEA Administrator Anne Milgram said. “Laundering drug money gives the Sinaloa Cartel the means to produce and import their deadly poison into the United States.”

It’s also a way to appear to legitimize illegal activity, IRS Criminal Investigations Chief Guy Ficco says. “Drug traffickers generate immense amounts of cash through their illicit operations. This case is a prime example of Chinese money launderers working hand in hand with drug traffickers to try to legitimize profits generated by drug activities.”

As part of the investigation, officials seized $5 million in narcotics proceeds, over 300 pounds of cocaine, over 90 pounds of methamphetamine, 3,000 Ecstasy pills, 44 pounds of magic mushrooms, numerous ounces of ketamine, three semi-automatic rifles with high-capacity magazines, and eight semi-automatic handguns.

If convicted of all charges, each defendant faces a mandatory minimum sentence of 10 years in prison up to life in prison.

The announcement comes after the U.S. authorities charged Chinese companies and executives with illicit fentanyl trafficking in New York. In Florida, they also charged China-based companies and their employees with crimes related to fentanyl and methamphetamine production, distribution of synthetic opioids, and sales resulting from precursor chemicals, The Center Square reported.

It also comes after the DOJ charged 28 members of the Sinaloa, including drug kingpin El Chapo’s sons, unsealing indictments in New York, Illinois, and the District of Columbia.

Maricopa’s Alleged Voting-Machine Thief Sought to Run as Dem. for U.S. Senate

(Jacob Bruns, Headline USA) An election worker in Arizona’s Maricopa County who was arrested Friday for allegedly stealing a key fob to the state’s primary election tabulator machines, had plans to eventually run for the United States Senate, the Arizona Independent reported.

Maricopa County detectives recently arrested and charged Walter Ringfield Jr., 27, a Phoenix resident and temporary county employee, with one count of theft and another count of criminal damage.

After some speculation as to the motive for the crime, it turns out that Ringfield filled out a statement of interest to run as a Democrat for the U.S. Senate race in Arizona on Jan. 22, 2023.

Unfortunately for Ringfield, however, the U.S. Constitution requires that Senators be 30 years old, and Ringfield is only 27. Furthermore, he is reportedly on probation for a previous felony.

The fact that he wished to run as a Democrat reveals his political leanings and narrows down the reasons why he might have stolen the key fob. Still, authorities have not yet found any clear answers.

In response, Maricopa County Attorney Rachel Mitchell, an outspoken election-integrity advocate, has come down hard on Ringfield, not allowing him to post bail. Responses from other public officials have varied.

According to a Local 10 report, at a Tuesday press conference, Maricopa County Sheriff Russ Skinner said that “this is not your average theft,” but denied having any knowledge of what may motivated Redfield.

The Republican National Committee also issued a statement, noting that it had sent staff to Maricopa County to investigate the incident.

According to RNC chairman Michael Whatley, the incident provides further reason to be concerned that Maricopa County struggles to run fair and free elections on top of lingering concerns over widespread irregularities in the 2020 and 2022 election cycles.

“This incident raises serious questions about election security in Arizona that must be answered—we will be constructively engaged with Maricopa County officials to ensure that the remedies to this security breach sufficiently address our concerns,”  Whatley said in a statement.

Maricopa County Supervisor Bill Gates, however, rejected Whatley’s view, claiming the fact that Redfield was caught indicated that safety protocols were working.

“The suspect was arrested the day we determined [the fob] was missing,” Gates said.

“This incident has shown all of the protocols that are in place,” he added. “We have cameras. We have observers.”