Saturday, March 2, 2024

SCOTUS Rejects Trump’s Appeal for Special-Master Review of Mar-a-Lago Docs

Trump said independent arbiter necessary to 'determine whether documents bearing classification markings are in fact classified...'

(Headline USA) The Supreme Court on Thursday rejected former President Donald Trump’s plea to step into the legal fight over the FBI search of his Florida estate.

The justices did not otherwise comment in turning away Trump’s emergency appeal.

Trump had pressed the court on an issue relating to classified documents seized in the search authorized by a federal judge of Mar-a-Lago.

The Trump team was asking the justices to overturn a lower court ruling and permit an independent arbiter, or special master, to review the roughly 100 documents with classified markings that were taken in the Aug. 8 raid of Mar-a-Lago, during which the FBI seized some 11,000 documents while searching the private quarters of Trump’s wife and teenage son among other parts of the estate.

Trump has suggested that the Justice Department operatives took personal effects including his will and his passports.

The former president’s legal team asked a judge in Florida, Aileen Cannon, to appoint a special master to do an independent review of the records.

Cannon subsequently assigned a veteran Brooklyn judge, Raymond Dearie, to review the records and segregate those that may be protected by claims of attorney–client privilege and executive privilege.

However, the Justice Department objected to Dearie’s ability to review the classified records, prompting the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals to review the case.

A three-judge panel from the Atlanta-based 11th Circuit last month limited the special master’s review to the much larger tranche of non-classified documents.

The judges, including two Trump appointees, sided with the Justice Department, which had argued there was no legal basis for the special master to conduct his own review of the classified records.

But Trump’s lawyers said in their application to the Supreme Court that it was essential for the special master to have access to the classified records to “determine whether documents bearing classification markings are in fact classified, and regardless of classification, whether those records are personal records or Presidential records.”

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

Copyright 2024. No part of this site may be reproduced in whole or in part in any manner without the permission of the copyright owner. To inquire about licensing content, use the contact form at https://headlineusa.com/advertising.
- Advertisement -