CBS Cancels Stephen Colbert’s ‘Late Show’

(Headline USA) When he wasn’t pushing vaccines or crying about President Donald Trump, talk show host Stephan Colbert told the occasional joke—like when he cracked up his audience by claiming that CNN is “objective” news.

That dismal era of late-night “comedy” is soon coming to an end. Colbert told his audience Thursday that CBS is axing “The Late Show With Stephen Colbert” in May 2026.

Colbert told the audience that he had learned the night before that “Next year will be our last season. The network will be ending the Late Show in May.”

The audience responded with boos and groans and Colbert said, “Yeah, I share your feelings.”

In his monologue on Monday night, he said he was “offended” by the $16 million settlement reached by Paramount, whose pending sale to Skydance Media needs the Trump administration’s approval.

“I don’t know if anything — anything — will repair my trust in this company,” Colbert said. “But, just taking a stab at it, I’d say $16 million would help.”

Paramount and CBS executives said in a statement the cancellation “is purely a financial decision against a challenging backdrop in late night. It is not related in any way to the show’s performance, content or other matters happening at Paramount.”

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

Justice Department Accuses Man of Threatening Greene

(Kim Jarrett, The Center Square)  A former employee with Voice of America is accused of threatening to harm U.S. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., her staff and her family, the Department of Justice said Thursday.

Seth Jason, of Edgewater, Md., is charged with influencing a federal official by threatening a family member, influencing a federal official by threat, interstate communications with a threat to kidnap or injure, and anonymous telecommunications harassment.

The Justice Department accuses Jason of making eight threatening phone calls to Greene’s Rome and Dalton offices between Oct. 11, 2023, and Jan. 21, 2025. The U.S. Capitol Police traced some of those phone calls to studios and control rooms at Voice of America, according to a news release from the Justice Department.

The charges of influencing a federal official by threatening a family member and influencing a federal official by threat carry a maximum sentence of 10 years each if a person is convicted. The maximum penalty for interstate communications with a threat to kidnap or injure is five years and there is a two-year maximum for anonymous telecommunications harassment, according to the Justice Department.

It’s not the first time Greene has been the subject of threats. Rome police were called to her home in December 2024 after someone sent her an email saying there was a bomb in her mailbox. A 66-year-old woman was killed in a wreck with a bomb squad officer responding to Greene’s home.

“These violent political threats have fatal consequences. It’s an undue strain on our law enforcement who must treat them seriously,” Greene said in a social media post after the incident. “The officer was responding to protect my life. And now, a woman has lost her life because of this despicable act.”

A man pleaded guilty in July 2024 to making threats against Greene. Sean Patrick Cirillo was sentenced in November to time served for the five months he spent in federal custody and to three years of supervised release.

20 States Sue Trump Administration Over FEMA Cuts

(Zachery Schmidt, The Center Square)  California, Arizona and Colorado, along with 17 other states, sued the Trump administration this week over its decision to close the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities program.

This program helps local communities nationwide protect themselves from natural disasters before they occur.

In April, FEMA announced it was ending this program as part of an effort to reduce government spending. The governmental agency said it canceled all BRIC applications from fiscal years 2020-2023.

A FEMA spokesperson said the BRIC program was “another example of a wasteful and ineffective FEMA program.” The spokesperson also said the BRIC program was “more concerned with political agendas” rather than helping Americans “affected by natural disasters.”

“Under Secretary Noem’s leadership, we are committed to ensuring that Americans in crisis can get the help and resources they need,” the spokesperson said.

California Attorney General Rob Bonta said Democrats and Republicans realized almost 30 years ago the importance of preventing disasters in order to save lives and money.

“Yet in the name of cutting waste, fraud, and abuse, President Trump and his lackeys have once again jeopardized public safety with their indiscriminate slashing of pre-disaster mitigation funding,” Bonta said in a news release. “We’re taking them to court – not because we want to, but because we have to. As we continue to build a climate resilient California, we deserve a federal government that is a partner, not a roadblock in our efforts – and that’s exactly what Congress intended.”

The program awarded funding to several California projects, including efforts to reduce landslide movement in Rancho Palos Verdes, mitigate flooding in Sacramento and seismically retrofit a hospital in Kern County.

Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes said her office is attempting to recover nearly $10 million that Arizona was scheduled to receive from BRIC funding. She added that the BRIC program selected 25 Arizona projects to receive grants.

She accused the Trump administration of showing hostility “toward helping states with disaster relief” with its attempt to slash FEMA.

These funds are “incredibly important” during the wildfire season, Mayes said.

“We are in wildfire season, and we need all hands-on-deck. Not to mention, Arizonans were counting on millions of these dollars to prevent future flooding in places like Buckeye and Camp Verde,” Mayes said.

Almost half the BRIC program funding was supposed to be allocated to Buckeye at $4.6 million. The city planned to use the money for an infrastructure project to improve its flood management.

Camp Verde would have received $860,000 for a flood mitigation project to help seal a major roadway against flooding.

In addition, Arizona would have received almost $1.2 million for salaries and other management costs.

Mayes’ press release says Arizona does not have the budgetary resources to make up for this lost funding.

Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser said his state’s residents realize the destructive power of wildfires, floods and other disasters.

“Cutting off this critical funding puts our communities at greater risk and undermines years of planning and investment,” Weiser said in a news release.

In the lawsuit, 19 attorneys general and one governor argue that FEMA’s decision to close the BRIC program violates Congress’s decision to fund it.

They add that the executive branch can’t lawfully refuse to spend money allocated by Congress.

Furthermore, they allege shutting down the BRIC program funding violates the Constitution’s Separation of Powers Clause and the Administrative Procedures Act.

APA decides how “federal agencies develop and issue regulations,” the Environmental Protection Agency says.

Additionally, the Democratic attorney generals and governor argue the Constitution’s Appointments Clause was violated because FEMA Administrator Cameron Hamilton ordered the program shutdown. They say since President Donald Trump did not appoint Hamilton and Congress did not confirm him, he was acting unlawfully.

The plaintiffs are seeking a preliminary injunction to halt the BRIC program’s closure and require the Trump administration to restore the program’s funding to the states.

Mayes, Bonta and Weiser were joined by fellow Democratic attorneys general from Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington and Wisconsin. Democratic Gov. Josh Shapiro represented Pennsylvania in this lawsuit.

Illegal Border Crossings Drop to Lowest Level on Record in June, Just Over 25,000

(Bethany Blankley, The Center Square) Illegal border crossings dropped to their lowest level in recorded U.S. history in June.

Nationwide, 25,228 illegal border crossers were apprehended, the lowest monthly total in history, according to newly published U.S. Customs and Border Protection data.

The greatest number apprehended were nationwide at land, sea and air ports of entry totaling 10,089, followed by 9,306 at the southwest border and 5,833 at the northern border, according to the data.

By comparison, under the Biden administration, there were 204,932 illegal border crossers reported in June 2024, 211,457 in June 2023 and 247,523 in June 2022, the highest numbers ever recorded for the month of June in U.S. history.

June apprehension data dropped from roughly 29,000, where it held consistent in May, April and March. These monthly totals dropped significantly after President Donald Trump entered office, down from 142,751 in October at the beginning of the fiscal year under the Biden administration.

As was the case every month and every year under the Biden and Trump administrations, the majority of illegal entries last month were of single adults, followed by individuals claiming to be in a family unit and unaccompanied minors.

Under the Biden administration, a record number of unaccompanied minors were smuggled and trafficked to the U.S. In fiscal 2022, nearly 153,000 unaccompanied minor illegal border crossers were reported, followed by 137,992 in fiscal 2023 and 110,672 in fiscal 2024. This fiscal year, 27,467 have been reported to date, according to CBP data.

Under new CBP Chief Rodney Scott, CBP is publishing additional information about Border Patrol apprehension data. It’s broken down by monthly totals reported nationwide, at the southwest and northern borders, “at entry” and “at large.” It excludes Office of Field Operations data.

CBP explains that Border Patrol apprehensions at entry “refers to an alien who has entered the United States without admission and has not yet reached his/her destination, regardless of the amount of time since entry.” Border Patrol apprehensions at large “refers to an alien who has illegally entered the United States, has already reached their destination, and is encountered or who was legally admitted and has since overstayed their permitted time, illegally remaining in the U.S.”

The data shows a 90% drop in Border Patrol apprehensions from June 2024 to June 2025. Border Patrol agents apprehended 87,606 illegal foreign nationals nationwide in June 2024. Among them, 1,800 were apprehended at large and 85,806 at entry. By June 2025, Border Patrol agents apprehended 8,024 nationwide, reporting 2,541 at large and 5,483 at entry, according to the data.

While illegal entries were down, drug seizures were up because more Border Patrol agents were in the field looking for drug traffickers. Total seizures of fentanyl, cocaine, methamphetamine, heroin, and marijuana increased by 13% nationwide compared to May, “reflecting continued pressure on cartel-driven smuggling routes,” CBP said.

The greatest increase of seizures was of meth, up by 102% from seizures in May. Heroin seizures increased by 19%, cocaine seizures increased by 9% and fentanyl seizures increased by 3% over the month.

Trump Administration Officially Defunds CA’s High Speed Rail

(Kenneth Schrupp, The Center Square)  The Trump administration officially terminated its funding of California’s 171-mile high speed rail segment in the state’s more sparsely populated Central Valley, citing an inability to complete the project by the 2033 deadline.

The administration also noted there’s no plan for closing a $7 billion funding gap on the $36.3 billion segment.

“[California High Speed Rail Authority] does not have a viable path to complete the [Early Operating Segment] by 2033 per its commitment,” wrote Federal Railroad Administration Acting Administrator Drew Feeley in a final determination letter. “CHSRA has a $7 billion funding gap (based on FRA’s conservative estimates) to complete the EOS, with no credible plan to secure additional funds.”

The notice terminates the $4 billion committed by the FRA to CHSRA, effective immediately.

Notably, the initial segment of the EOS would have been a 119-mile segment connecting Madera, which has a population of nearly 70,000, and Poplar Avenue in Kern County, which is near Shafter, a small city of just over 20,000 residents northwest of Bakersfield.

California Gov. Gavin Newsom responded by tying the rail project to international geopolitical competition with China.

“Trump wants to hand China the future and abandon the Central Valley,” said Newsom in a statement. “We won’t let him.”

California Republican legislators in turn shared their confusion about the relationship between the state’s high speed rail program and China.

“He is so clueless that he actually believes that a train project utilizing antiquated technology, that is billions of dollars over budget and behind schedule is the ‘key’ to beating China? That a bullet train to help urbanites zip through on the way to LA will ‘help’ the Central Valley instead of water and energy investments, cutting high utilities and gas costs, and fast tracking next-gen AI and other technology to leap past China,” said California Assembly Minority Leader James Gallagher, R-East Nicolaus.

“Meanwhile, he has hamstrung our economy, raised our cost of living beyond belief, and literally forced us to buy Chinese solar panels and electric vehicles,” the continued Gallagher.

Newsom just reauthorized funding from the state’s cap-and-trade program, which charges companies for carbon dioxide emissions, to provide about $1 billion per year for the project, which appears to be continuing without federal funding.

Israeli Tank Strikes Gaza’s Only Catholic Church, Killing Three and Injuring a Priest

(Dave DeCamp, Antiwar.com) An Israeli military tank on Thursday struck the Holy Family Catholic Church in Gaza City, killing three people and wounding at least nine others.

Two of the dead have been identified as Saad Salameh, the parish’s 60-year-old janitor, and Fumayya Ayyad, an 84-year-old woman who was receiving psychosocial support from the Catholic charity Caritas in a tent located at the church.

Among the wounded was Father Gabriel Romanelli, the church’s priest from Argentina, who regularly held phone calls with the late Pope Francis. Suhail Shadi Abu Dawoud, a young altar server, was also wounded in the attack, according to the Church’s Facebook page.

“The people in the Holy Family Compound are people who found in the Church a sanctuary—hoping that the horrors of war might at least spare their lives, after their homes, possessions, and dignity had already been stripped away,” the Latin Patriarchate said in a statement on the attack.

“The Latin Patriarchate strongly condemns this tragedy and this targeting of innocent civilians and of a sacred place. However, this tragedy is not greater or more terrible than the many others that have befallen Gaza. Many other innocent civilians have also been harmed, displaced and killed. Death, suffering and destruction are everywhere,” the Patriarchate added.

Pope Leo XIV also released a statement on the attack. “I am deeply saddened to learn of the loss of life and injury caused by the military attack on the Holy Family Catholic Church in Gaza,” he said. “I renew my call for an immediate ceasefire. Only dialogue and reconciliation can ensure enduring peace!”

The Israeli military claimed that the strike was an accident, but the Latin Patriarch, Cardinal Pierbattista Pizzaballa, cast doubt on the IDF statement. “What we know for sure is that a tank, the IDF says by mistake, but we are not sure about this, they hit the church directly, the Church of the Holy Family, the Latin Church,” he said. “We don’t have complete information about what has happened in Gaza today because the communication in Gaza is not that simple.”

Sources close to the Patriarchate told The Pillar that internally, Church authorities were considering the possibility that the tank attack was a direct response to a recent meeting of Christian leaders in the West Bank town of Taybeh on Monday. Taybeh is a Christian village that’s been under Jewish settler attack, and Pizzaballa and other church leaders released a statement strongly condemning the violence and calling out Israeli authorities for “facilitating and enabling” the violent settlers.

Later on Thursday, the office of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu put out a statement saying that “Israel deeply regrets that a stray ammunition hit Gaza’s Holy Family Church.” According to a report from Axios, the statement was released after President Trump spoke with Netanyahu. The report said Trump was upset about the strike, and Netanyahu told him it was an accident. Trump then told the Israeli leader to put out a statement saying that.

The Holy Family Church is Gaza’s sole Catholic church and has previously come under attack by Israeli forces. In December 2024, two Christian women at the church were killed and seven people were wounded by Israeli snipers, an incident Pope Francis condemned as “terrorism.”

The IDF has also attacked the nearby St. Porphyrius Greek Orthodox Church. In October 2023,  an Israeli strike killed 18 Palestinian civilians who were sheltering at St. Porphyrius, including relatives of former House Rep. Justin Amash.

A funeral was held on Thursday at the St. Porphyrius Church for Saad Salameh and Fumayya Ayyadon, who were both Orthodox Christians. “May the souls of the victims rest in eternal peace and may the Lord grant you all His Peace,” the Latin Patriarchate said in its statement.

This article originally appeared at Antiwar.com.

CBS Reporter Says He Has PTSD from Butler Rally—Not from the Shooting, but from Crowd’s Reaction

(Ken Silva, Headline USA) CBS News reporter Scott MacFarlane recently went on Meet the Press host Chuck Todd’s podcast to discuss his experience at the July 13, 2024, Trump rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, where a gunman nearly took President Donald Trump’s life.

MacFarlane told Todd that he has Post Traumatic Stress Disorder from the assassination attempt, which also resulted in the death of firefighter Corey Comperatore and serious wounds for at least two others. But that’s not why MacFarlane has PTSD. Rather, he says he was scarred by the crowd’s reaction.

“I got diagnosed with PTSD within 48 hours. I got put on trauma leave. Not because, I think, of the shooting, but because you could — you saw it in the eyes, the reaction of the people,” MacFarlane said. “They were coming for us! If he didn’t jump up with his fist, they were going to come kill us!”

MacFarlane wrote numerous stories about the Justice Department’s prosecutions of Jan. 6, 2021, Captiol Hill protestors during the Biden administration. MacFarlane’s coverage was extremely favorable towards the DOJ.

MacFarlane wasn’t the only person from the Trump rally who professes to have PTSD. Two of the Secret Service’s counter-snipers left the deadly Trump rally believing that they took fire—with one of them telling Congress that he can’t use his agency’s radios anymore due to the trauma from the event, according to recently released interview transcripts.

“The sound that a radio transmission makes is the same sound as a round snapping by. So I can’t use them because it brings me back to that day,” he said. “I’m telling you, in my knowledge, training, and physical experience, a round was close enough for me to smack with my hand.”

Reacting to that disclosure, a Task Force member told him, “I’m sorry that some of those comms issues are bringing you back to that day. I can only imagine … That’s traumatic.”

The Task Force member then asked him if he believes the shots at him were fired by alleged gunman Thomas Crooks, to which the counter-sniper responded: “I couldn’t positively identify whether Crooks was shooting at me because I never saw Crooks, but if someone from Butler PD was engaging us, I have a list of questions for them.”

Ken Silva is the editor of Headline USA. Follow him at x.com/jd_cashless.

BREAKING: President Trump Diagnosed w/ ‘Chronic Venous Insufficiency’

(Headline USA) White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt on Thursday read a doctor’s letter about President Donald Trump that she said was intended to dispel health concerns about the swelling in his ankles and a makeup-covered hand.

Leavitt said Trump noticed “mild swelling” in his lower legs and was evaluated by the White House medical unit.

She said the tests showed “no evidence of deep vein thrombosis or arterial disease,” but that Trump has “chronic venous insufficiency,” a fairly common condition in older adults when little valves inside the veins that normally help move blood against gravity up the legs gradually lose the ability to work properly.

Leavitt said the issue is common in people older than age 70. Trump turned 79 last month.

People often are advised to lose weight, walk for exercise and elevate their legs periodically, and some may be advised to wear compression stockings. Severe cases over time can lead to complications including lower leg sores called ulcers. Blood clots are one cause, but Leavitt said that was tested for and ruled out.

She also said bruising on Trump’s hand that has been covered up by makeup is “consistent” with irritation from his “frequent handshaking and the use of aspirin.”

Leavitt said “the president remains in excellent health.”

She promised to make the doctor’s letter public.

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

Ex-FBI Agent Floats Rumor that Director Patel is a Closeted Homosexual Who Parties All Night

(Ken Silva, Headline USA) FBI Director Kashyap Patel is reportedly living with GOP donor Michael Muldoon in the billionaire’s Las Vegas home—an arrangement that’s raising some eyebrows within the bureau, according to former FBI agent Kyle Seraphin.

Patel’s residence was reported in February by The Nevada Independent, which said at the time that he cast mail ballots from Muldoon’s residence in the presidential primary in February 2024, the state and federal primaries that June, and then in the general election last November.

“Patel and Muldoon even took a golf trip together to Scotland back when the FBI director was a federal employee on the National Security Council, which could be an ethics violation,” the local news site reported at the time.

According to Seraphin, agents in the bureau are raising questions about the relationship.

“The other question I’ve had people bring up … including people who are pro-Trump … They don’t know a lot of 50- or 40-something-year-old Indian men that are unmarried and living with other men that don’t have something going on,” Seraphin recently said on the show Redacted, hosted by Clay Morris. “There’s rumors passing around the FBI that have kind of intimidated that this may be more than just two men living together, which by the way, for two men in their 40s and 50s is a pretty strange circumstance.”

Seraphin also repeated another rumor about Patel—that he’s been partying more than working.

“The last thing we’ve been hearing is the protective detail is having to wake up Kash Patel on a regular basis because he’s out partying all night in DC, and maybe in Vegas as well,” Seraphin said.

The ex-FBI agent’s remarks were similar to those made by another former agent, Frank Figluzzi, who in May said: “Reportedly (Patel has) been visible at nightclubs far more than he has been on the seventh floor of the Hoover Building.”

MSNBC retracted Figluzzi’s comment on May 5, but that didn’t stop Patel from filing a lawsuit a month later.

“There was no basis for [Figluzzi’s] fabrication, and Defendant’s use of the weasel word, ‘reportedly,’ is itself a fabrication, as Defendant did not rely on reporting by any other person. Defendant made up the story out of whole cloth, and by using the word ‘reportedly,’ attempts to distance himself from what is a maliciously false and defamatory statement,” Patel’s June 2 lawsuit states.

Patel seeks more than $75,000 in Compensatory, special, and punitive damages from Figluzzi. It’s unclear how Figluzzi’s comments damaged Patel. In fact, Patel has arguably done more to destroy his own reputation in recent months by backtracking on his promises.

Since taking the healm at the bureau, Patel flip-flopped on domestic surveillance and now supports warrantless spying, he’s backtracked on releasing the Jeffrey Epstein files, and he hasn’t exposed the U.S. government’s involvement in the Jan. 6, 2021, protests-turned-riots. In fact, he’s even promoted a top FBI official who hunted J6ers over the last four years.

Most recently, Patel’s pushed for a bigger budget for the FBI, insisted that Epstein killed himself, and said that there’s nothing more for the public to know about the July 13 Trump assassination attempt. Despite saying that the investigation into July 13 is closed, Patel’s FBI has refused to release records on that incident.

The lawyer for Patel’s lawsuit against Figluzzi didn’t immediately respond to Headline USA’s media inquiry about Seraphin’s comments. The FBI also didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.

Ken Silva is the editor of Headline USA. Follow him at x.com/jd_cashless.

Is Undisclosed Russian Silver Buying Driving the Price Higher?

(Mike Maharrey, Money Metals News Service) Are undeclared silver purchases by the Russian government boosting the price of silver?

There is some anecdotal evidence that they are.

Silver is up nearly 28 percent this year. It briefly traded above $39 an ounce earlier this week.

Silver has been set up for a rally for quite a while. While it was up 20.5 percent in 2024, most people felt silver underperformed, as it remained well below its all-time highs even as gold set record after record. Even with those gains, the gold-silver ratio grew historically wide, at over 100-1, signifying that silver was significantly underpriced compared to gold.

Silver began to rally last month, and it’s likely not a coincidence that the 2025 Russian budget called for an allocation of 51.5 billion rubles to buy precious metals and gemstones, and the plan indicated that silver would be added to the state fund’s mix of assets for the first time.

While hard data is difficult to come by, especially given the sanctions imposed on the Russian government, it is highly possible that Russian buying is helping boost the silver price.

Writing for Forbes, Australian journalist Tim Treadgold noted that the silver price has outperformed gold ever since Russia made this announcement at the end of September.

“Silver is moving out of a long shadow cast by gold, its precious metal sister, with hints of a major new buyer, Russia’s central bank, starting to influence the silver price, which has risen to a 14-year high.”

The Russian central bank didn’t indicate how much silver it might acquire, and it hasn’t released any new information since the budget came out last fall, but Treadgold said he thinks the central bank has waded into the silver market.

“The relatively strong performance recently by silver compared with gold could be an indication of increasing central bank activity in the silver market.”

Russia could also be stockpiling silver for industrial and military use in an effort to shield itself from supply constraints and volatile prices.

Could Silver Be Re-Monetized?

At one time, silver played an important role in the global economy, but it was gradually demonetized over the course of the 19th and 20th centuries.

In the early 1870s, Germany shifted from silver to gold after unification, and that sparked a global move toward gold. In 1873, the Coinage Act ended the free coinage of silver, putting the U.S. on a path toward a gold standard. In 1965, President Lyndon Johnson removed silver from U.S. coins.

Russia’s decision to include silver in its state fund could prove significant, especially if other countries follow suit. This could even lead to a re-monetization of silver.

When Russia made the announcement, the Jerusalem Post raised an interesting question.

“Gold, once treated with a degree of skepticism by some governments, has become a safe haven asset, particularly in times of economic uncertainty. Could silver follow a similar trajectory?”

Industrial offtake accounts for more than 50 percent of silver demand, but at its core, it is a monetary metal. The Post speculated that “silver’s dual role as both an industrial commodity and a potential financial asset could make it more attractive to governments seeking to hedge against economic volatility.

Treadgold speculated that Russia’s allies could follow suit.

“If the Russian central bank is quietly building a silver stockpile, as seems to be the case, then it is possible to see other banks aligned to Russia following its lead.”

He specifically mentioned the possibility of the BRICS bloc turning to silver as part of its de-dollarization efforts.

“Part of the BRICS plan is to accumulate gold as they look for a way to bypass the dollar, though with the gold price hovering close to an all-time high, that action has been hugely expensive. Silver, which has always been seen as an alternative to gold, even to the point of acquiring an unkind nickname of the poor man’s gold, might enable members of the BRIC group to push on with their plan to break free of the dollar.”

Of course, this is all speculation. However, it’s certainly plausible and worth consideration.

Regardless, there is no doubt that there is growing interest in silver. Investment demand surged through the first half of 2025, with inflows of silver into ETFs eclipsing the total for the entirety of 2024.

And it appears that there is still plenty of upside. Even with the recent rally in silver, it remains historically underpriced based on both technical and supply-and-demand dynamics.


Mike Maharrey is a journalist and market analyst for Money Metals with over a decade of experience in precious metals. He holds a BS in accounting from the University of Kentucky and a BA in journalism from the University of South Florida.