Alex Jones Loses It After Rising Host Accuses Him of Trump Censorship

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) Alex Jones minced no words Tuesday in response to journalist Owen Shroyer quitting Infowars to launch his own show.

Jones appeared visibly frustrated on his radio program and during live broadcasts after Shroyer suggested that censorship of Trump- and Israel-related stories was among the reasons he wanted to exit Infowars.

“You are a snake,” Jones exclaimed, his fingers pointing at the camera. “You are a rat! You are a fraud! You are a backstabber! You are a hand-biter! You are a disgrace!”

“He’s gonna stab me in the back. I’m not here to be shit on or stabbed in the back,” Jones added.

Shroyer shared his side of the story on Monday via Rumble and X.

“Alex was disrupting the show. It just didn’t go well. I reached my point of no return, so I walked out of the studio,” Shroyer said.

He claimed Jones removed him from the Infowars studios, not allowing him to say goodbye to the audience.

“He didn’t express any interest in that,” Shroyer claimed. “He told me that he didn’t need me and good luck… I will not be on Infowars. I don’t know if ever again. I was left with no choice. This is not how I wanted it to be. I did not want it to go this way. I tried everything so it wouldn’t go this way.”

Shroyer was with Infowars for nearly a decade.

Sick Video Shows Tim Walz Eerily Hinting at Trump’s Death

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz joked about false rumors of President Donald Trump’s death over Labor Day weekend — going so far as to imply he is eagerly awaiting the day the president passes.

“You get up in the morning and you doom scroll through things and although I will say this, you woke up the last few days thinking there might be news,” Walz said, referencing the online rumor.

“Just saying, just saying. There will be news sometime, just so you know. There will be news,” he added.

Walz is a longtime Trump critic who lost the 2024 vice-presidential race to now-Vice President JD Vance.

His weekend comments came as false reports of Trump’s death circulated on social media, likely fueled by leftist trolls.

Journalists quickly debunked the claims, noting the president had been seen earlier in the day.

Trump was later spotted golfing with his granddaughter, Kai Trump, in Virginia, the Daily Caller reported.

Walz’s mocking reaction comes as Democrats once again dabble in the violent rhetoric that preceded two nearly successful assassination attempts against Trump.

Walz’s Democratic allies repeatedly branded Trump an existential threat to democracy before the 2024 election. This message did not resonate with most Americans, who sent Trump back to the White House.

Trump Claims US Strike on Boat Near Venezuela Targeted Tren de Aragua Gang

(Dave DeCamp, Antiwar.comPresident Trump claimed in a post on Truth Social that a US military strike on a boat near Venezuela targeted Tren de Aragua (TDA), a Venezuelan gang that the Trump administration recently designated as a terrorist organization. The post came after Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the US conducted a strike against a boat that had departed Venezuela.

“Earlier this morning, on my Orders, US Military Forces conducted a kinetic strike against positively identified Tren de Aragua Narcoterrorists in the SOUTHCOM area of responsibility,” the president said.

Trump posted a video of the strike and claimed that it killed 11 “terrorists,” though no evidence has been provided to back up his claims. “No US Forces were harmed in this strike. Please let this serve as notice to anybody even thinking about bringing drugs into the United States of America,” Trump said.

The president also claimed that TDA is “operating under the control” of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro, but that contradicts a recently declassified US intelligence memo that said it was unlikely that Maduro’s government cooperates with or directs TDA.

The memo from the Office of the Director of Intelligence, dated April 7, 2025, said that some members of the Venezuelan government may tolerate or cooperate with TDA, but Maduro and his top officials view the group as a threat. “The Maduro regime probably does not have a policy of cooperating with TDA and is not directing TDA movement to and operations in the United States,” the memo states.

Trump said the strike hit the boat while it was operating in international waters. He also claimed that the boat was carrying drugs and heading to the US, which contradicts earlier comments from Rubio, who told reporters that the drugs that were allegedly carried on the boat were likely headed toward Trinidad and Tobago or “some other country in the Caribbean.”

Rep. Carlos Gimenez (R-FL) claimed in a post on X that the US had sunk a boat belonging to the “Cartel of the Suns,” a term used to describe a network of Venezuelan government and military officials allegedly involved in drug trafficking, but does not actually exist as an organization.

The US has also designated the Cartel of the Sons as a terrorist organization and claims Maduro is its leader, which he and other Latin American leaders deny. The strike on the boat comes after the US has deployed at least nine warships toward Venezuela, which is seen as a push toward another regime change effort against Maduro.

Rubio was a staunch supporter of the first regime change effort when he was a senator, and according to a report from Axios, he is largely driving Trump’s current Venezuela policy. Rubio recently announced that the bounty on Maduro’s head was increased to $50 million, and the Trump administration has designated several cartels, including the so-called Cartel of the Suns, as “Specially Designated Global Terrorists.”

One US official told Axios that the current operation against Venezuela could be “Noriega part 2,” referring to the 1989 US invasion of Panama that led to the ouster of Manuel Noriega. Maduro has vowed to fight if the US attacks, warning on Monday that he will declare a “republic in arms.”

This article originally appeared at Antiwar.com.

 

House Oversight Committee Releases Trove of Epstein Documents

(The Center Square) More than 33,000 pages related to the Jeffrey Epstein case have been released by the U.S. Department of Justice after the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform issued a subpoena.

Committee Chairman Rep. James Comer, R-Ky., said the DOJ “has indicated it will continue producing records while ensuring the redaction of victim identities and child abuse material.”

The Tuesday night records drop comes nearly a month after the committee issued subpoenas for key government officials, including former President Bill Clinton and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, as part of a congressional investigation into the well-connected financier and sex offender Epstein.

The issued subpoenas include the Clintons, former FBI Director James Comey, former U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch, former U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder, former U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland, former FBI Director Robert Mueller, former U.S. Attorney General William Barr, former U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions and former U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales as part of the House investigation on the “oversight of the federal government’s enforcement of sex trafficking laws” and the “handling of the investigation and prosecution” of Epstein and close confidant Ghislane Maxwell.

While speaking to reporters Tuesday evening, Comer said the subpoena list had been expanded to include former U.S. Attorney Alex Acosta, who struck a plea deal for Epstein in 2008.

Comer indicated that more individuals will be subpoenaed as part of the investigation.

“We’re going to continue to bring in more people. We learned of some additional names. Today, we’re going to do everything we can to give the American public the transparency they seek,” Comer told reporters.

The records release comes less than two weeks after the DOJ released the audio and transcript interviews with Epstein associate, Ghislaine Maxwell, which occurred during a two-day interview conducted by Deputy U.S. Attorney General Todd Blanche regarding her relationship with Epstein, as well as the deceased financier and sex offender’s relationships with Trump and former President Bill Clinton.

Notably, Maxwell denied the existence of a client list. She also denied that Epstein was engaging in blackmail or had ties with any intelligence agencies.

Dems Lose MSNBC After Network Agrees with Trump on Chicago Crime

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) You know it’s bad for Democrats when even MSNBC won’t carry their water.

On Tuesday, MSNBC host Joe Scarborough publicly begged Illinois Democrats to work with President Donald Trump to rein in Chicago’s lawlessness after a Labor Day weekend marred by seven deaths and more than 50 wounded.

His call came as Trump weighed deploying the National Guard despite defiance from Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker and Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson.

“I actually think that JB Pritzker should do something radical. I think he should pick up the phone, call the president and say, ‘You know and I know you don’t have the constitutional authority to deploy the National Guard here. You can do that in DC. You can’t do that in Chicago. But let’s partner up,’” Scarborough said Tuesday on Morning Joe.

Scarborough’s public remarks were directed at Illinois Democrats—mainly Pritzker, who has claimed that red states have the highest crime rates.

Scarborough swiftly pushed back against this line of defense, saying: “You know, it would be radical for us to figure out a way to actually do what I’ve been saying from the very beginning in Washington. And that is seeing politicians creating partnerships that protect their people.”

“Because, right now, just the, ‘Hey, nothing to see here. Moving along, no problem here. Hey, Donald Trump, we don’t need you.’ And, you know, the mayor talking about ‘We’re going to protect people’s dignity in our city,’” the MSNBC host continued.

Watch the full remarks below:

Ilhan Omar’s Net Worth Soars to $30M Despite Socialist Policies

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) Rep. Ilhan Omar, the radical Democrat from Minnesota, has amassed a net worth of up to $30 million, a shocking climb from being in red when she first entered Congress in 2018.

Her latest financial disclosures reveal that she and her husband, former political consultant Tim Mynett, are now worth between $6 million and $30 million, according to the Washington Free Beacon.

“Their wealth is derived almost entirely from the value of Mynett’s ownership stake in his two companies that, together, were worth no more than $51,000 at the end of 2023,” the outlet reported.

“The exact value of Omar’s personal fortune at the end of 2024 is unclear—lawmakers disclose the value of their holdings and debts in ranges. Still, the figures in Omar’s latest disclosures show that her and her husband’s net worth skyrocketed by at least 3,500 percent in just one year,” it added.

Omar’s fortune largely comes from her husband’s California-based winery eStCru LLC and venture capital firm Rose Lake Capital.

Despite sluggish income at the end of 2023 and a string of lawsuits, Mynett’s combined stake in both firms skyrocketed to between $6 million and $30 million.

The explosive growth is at odds with Omar’s past denials that she is a millionaire.

In remarks to Business Insider, she said that she has faced a “coordinated right-wing disinformation campaign claiming all sorts of wild things, including the ridiculous claim I am worth millions of dollars which is categorically false.”

“I am a working mom with student loan debt,” she added.

These comments came after she scolded conservative commentator Mila Joy as a “dummy” in February for implying Omar was worth millions.

“I know your brain has rotten from the conspiracy theories you are consuming daily but try not to announce your stupidity to the world,” Omar wrote in response to Joy’s accusations. “My salary is $174,000 before taxes, I don’t have stock or own a home and still paying off my student debt.”

Omar’s apparent hypocrisy is not surprising. Several other Democrats have faced ridicule for demanding higher taxes on millionaires while quietly enjoying a wealthy lifestyle.

Among them are Sens. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., and Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., and Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif.

Sen. Joni Ernst of Iowa Confirms She Will not Run for Reelection in 2026

(Headline USA) U.S. Sen. Joni Ernst said Tuesday that she will not seek reelection next year, confirming in a video post on social media that she will retire after months of speculation about her plans.

Ernst’s departure opens up a Senate seat in the state known for its long-serving incumbents. Ernst was first elected in 2014 to the open seat previously held by Tom Harkin, a Democrat who served for 30 years. Republican Chuck Grassley, Iowa’s senior U.S. senator, was first elected to the Senate in 1980.

Her announcement Tuesday followed reports last week that she was expected to announce her retirement in September. In a video, Ernst cited her aging and growing family as a reason for opting out of a reelection bid.

“This was no easy decision,” Ernst said. “I never imagined this farm girl would have the opportunity to serve as a lieutenant colonel and then a United States senator.”

It is another unexpected retirement for Senate Republicans as they work to maintain their majority in the chamber, with Ernst joining Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina, who turned down a reelection bid after clashing with President Donald Trump.

It also could have ripple effects down the ballot if third-term Rep. Ashley Hinson from the Cedar Rapids area in eastern Iowa jumps into the race, as is widely expected. Hinson’s decision could also complicate House Republicans’ efforts to keep control as Democrats look for opportunities to flip seats in once-competitive Iowa, where two of Iowa’s four congressional districts have been among the country’s most competitive in recent elections.

Immediately after Ernst’s announcement, Hinson thanked the senator for her service and previewed her entry into the race, saying Trump needs a “fighter in the Senate who will always have his back.”

“I’ve stood shoulder to shoulder with the President to pass this America First agenda in the House and I would be his strongest ally in the Senate,” Hinson said in a post on X, formerly Twitter.

Hinson said she would have an announcement soon.

Two Republicans — former state Sen. Jim Carlin and veteran Joshua Smith — had already entered the primary to challenge Ernst.

Several Democrats are seeking the party’s nomination for the seat, including state Sen. Zach Wahls; state Rep. Josh Turek; Jackie Norris, chair of the Des Moines School Board; and Nathan Sage, a former chamber of commerce president.

Ernst, Iowa’s first woman elected to Congress, is an Iraq War combat veteran and retired from the Army National Guard as a lieutenant colonel. She served for several years in Senate GOP leadership and was considered a vice presidential contender for Trump’s first White House run.

But Ernst has faced pressure from all sides in the last year. She took heat after signaling a hesitance to support one of Trump’s Cabinet picks. She’s also been one of the faces of Democrats’ campaign against the sprawling tax and spending package after she made a retort about Medicaid cuts at a town hall.

Sen. Tim Scott of South Carolina, chair of the National Republican Senatorial Committee, touted Ernst’s service helping Iowa families and making Washington “squeal,” a reference to her original campaign message that spoke of her experience castrating hogs.

“Traveling across the Hawkeye State with Joni, I know she loves Iowa, and Iowa loves her,” he wrote in a post on X.

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press.

Trump Again Suggests He Could Back European Troops in Ukraine With Air Power as Part of a Security Guarantee

(Dave DeCamp, Antiwar.com) President Trump suggested in an interview with the Daily Caller published on Tuesday that he would be willing to back a European troop deployment in Ukraine as part of a security guarantee for a potential future peace deal, an arrangement Russia has made clear it would never accept.

Trump was asked if he was considering using US troops for security guarantees, and he said “no,” but made clear he was open to the idea of using US air power, something he has previously suggested.

When asked if he would use US planes for the security guarantees, Trump said, “Maybe we’ll do something. Look, I’d like to see something get solved. They’re not our soldiers, but there are, five to 7,000, mostly young people, being killed every single week. If I could stop that and have a plane flying around the air every once in a while, it’s going to be mostly the Europeans, but we, we’d help them. They, you know, they sort of need it, and we’d help them if we could get something done.”

The insistence from European officials on sending troops to Ukraine could be what ends up sinking the peace process. Russia has said that it must be involved in talks on security guarantees for Ukraine, but European leaders continue to discuss the idea with Ukrainian officials without Russian involvement.

Trump was asked how his support for the potential security guarantees squares with an “America First” foreign policy and pointed to the fact that NATO countries are now purchasing US weapons for Ukraine, although a recent deal that will arm Ukraine with long-range cruise missiles will be partially funded by US military aid.

“Look, we were spending hundreds of billions of dollars in that war. Now we sell equipment to NATO. I got them to go from two to five. Nobody thought that was, and pay. We sell equipment to NATO. We don’t sell it to Ukraine. We sell it to NATO. They pay for the equipment. We’re not spending any money on the war,” Trump said.

He again expressed support for backing a security guarantee that involves European troops in Ukraine. “And other than that, look, if I don’t think it can be settled without a security guarantee of some kind,  and we’re not going to have boots on the ground or anything else. But if we can help Europe, and you know, they’ll, they’ll be out there,” he said.

This article originally appeared at Antiwar.com. 

 

Red Beret-Wearing Republican Curtis Sliwa Likes His Chances in a Crowded NYC Mayor’s Race

(Headline USA) Curtis Sliwa, the colorful creator of New York City’s Guardian Angels anti-crime patrol group, ran for mayor four years ago.

This time around, the red beret-wearing Republican believes the math may be more in his favor.

The 71-year-old hopes that with three polarizing candidates splitting the Democratic vote, he can maintain the support he secured last time while picking up backers from the other side of the aisle with his message that he’s best positioned to fight crime.

Zohran Mamdani, a 33-year-old state lawmaker and democratic socialist, is the Democratic nominee after upsetting former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo in the primary. Cuomo, who resigned as governor four years ago after sexual harassment allegations, is running as an independent.

Meanwhile, Adams, wounded by a federal bribery case and the Trump administration’s extraordinary intervention to drop the charges, skipped the primary altogether and is instead campaigning for a second term as an independent.

“Zohran obviously is very unique. He’s way to the left, but then again, Cuomo and Adams, listen to the way they talk. They’re Zohran-lite,” Sliwa told The Associated Press. “I will be the alternative.”

While the city’s Democratic primary race used ranked choice voting — allowing voters’ second, third, fourth and even fifth preferences to be counted if their favorite candidate doesn’t secure enough votes — that’s not the case in the general election. So the person with the most votes on Election Day will be the new mayor.

Even if he doesn’t win, Sliwa might play the spoiler. While some Mamdani critics have urged Sliwa to drop out and throw his support behind someone with a better chance of beating the Democratic nominee, Sliwa says that isn’t happening.

Sliwa is hoping to ride to victory on crime, an issue that helped Adams, a former police captain, win the pandemic-era 2021 election.

This year’s Democratic primary was dominated by discussions of New York’s high cost of living, but Sliwa believes crime is “beginning to creep up and almost be equal” to other issues voters care about.

Sliwa’s Guardian Angels — a band of beret-wearing citizens — patrolled graffitied subway cars and the rough-and-tumble streets starting in the late 1970s, when crime was rampant. The city, by every measurable metric, has gotten much safer. So far this year, the city has had its fewest shooting incidents and shooting victims in decades. Crime is down this year in nearly every category, according to police.

But in Sliwa’s telling, crime is “exploding.”

In the Bronx, “blood is pouring from the streets.” The “madams and pimps” on the outskirts of Queens need to be arrested and the “Johns” should be named and shamed. When women ride the subway, they get “perved on,” Sliwa said.

If the crime stats won’t paint the picture, Sliwa is happy to.

As Sliwa spoke with a small gaggle of journalists on a street corner at a recent campaign stop, he illustrated an argument about the statistics by forming his hand into a gun — a “9 millimeter,” he said — and pointed it at his surprised spokesperson. “Bang, bang, bang, bang, bang!” he said.

In another interview, he recounted how, in 1992, he was shot multiple times in what prosecutors later said was an attempted mob hit. Sliwa had been blasting Gambino crime family boss John Gotti on the radio. The mob boss’s son, John “Junior” Gotti, was charged with ordering the shooting, but multiple juries deadlocked and prosecutors eventually gave up the case.

Sliwa, like President Donald Trump, has long been a larger-than-life New York City tabloid figure.

His campaign has shades of some national Republican talking points — bashing the state’s bail laws and saying the National Guard should patrol high-crime areas. But he has also criticized some of the president’s actions and urged him not to weigh in on the mayoral race.

For many years, he co-hosted a local radio show with left-leaning civil rights lawyer Ron Kuby. More recently, he’s become an animal-rights activist, and his large collection of cats featured prominently in his first campaign for mayor.

As he strolled up and down a Bronx block recently, shaking hands and passing out campaign cards, he ran into Noemi Molina, 62, who froze at the sight of him: She had known about Sliwa since he started the Guardian Angels and had been seeing him in the news for decades.

“He’s still trying, he’s still striving,” said Molina, who said she would vote for him. “He’s still trying to get things done. He’s trying to help.”

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press.

Venezuela’s Maduro Says If the US Attacks, He Will Declare the Country a ‘Republic in Arms’

(Dave DeCamp, Antiwar.com) Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro held a press conference on Monday where he addressed the deployment of US warships off Venezuela’s coast and warned that if the US attacked, he would declare his country a “republic in arms” and engage in an “armed struggle.”

According to Newsweek, the US has deployed nine warships, including three guided-missile destroyers, three amphibious assault ships, and one nuclear-powered fast attack submarine, toward Venezuela. The stated purpose of the deployment is to combat drug cartels, but there’s no evidence to support the US claim that Maduro is a cartel leader, signaling the real purpose is another regime change effort in Venezuela.

The Trump administration claims that Maduro is the leader of the Cartel of the Suns, a term used to describe a network of Venezuelan government and military officials allegedly involved in drug trafficking, but it does not actually exist as an organization. Maduro and other Latin American leaders, including Colombian President Gustavo Petro, have denied the US claims.

Maduro pointed out the involvement of Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who was a staunch supporter of the failed coup attempt against the Venezuelan leader during President Trump’s first term in office, and recently announced the bounty on Maduro’s head was increased to $50 million. “President Trump must be careful because Marco Rubio wants to drag him into a war against South America and stain the Trump name with blood,” he said.

In response to the US deployments, Maduro has deployed troops to the coast and the Colombian border, ordered additional naval patrols, and mobilized a pro-government militia he says has millions of members. “If Venezuela is attacked, we will resort to armed struggle to defend our national territory,” he said. “We would declare ourselves a republic in arms to guarantee our country’s peace, sovereignty, and development.”

Axios reported on Friday that the US is closer to an armed conflict with Venezuela than ever before and that advisors close to President Trump “aren’t entirely sure whether the gunboat diplomacy is a drug trafficking operation with undertones of regime change, or a Caracas coup operation masquerading as drug enforcement.”

One official claimed it was about drug trafficking, saying the purpose was “105% about narco-terrorism, but if Maduro winds up no longer in power, no one will be crying.” Another official had a different view, suggesting it could be “Noriega part 2,” referring to the 1989 US invasion of Panama that led to the ouster of Manuel Noriega.

“The president has asked for a menu of options. And ultimately, this is the president’s decision about what to do next, but Maduro should be s***ting bricks,” the official added. A third official said that leaving Maduro in power would be like “making Jeffrey Epstein the head of a daycare.”

The officials believe an invasion is unlikely but the Trump administration hasn’t ruled it out. Other options include launching airstrikes or missile strikes from US warships. The Axios report said that some in Trump’s orbit think there’s a possibility of launching a drone strike to take out Maduro, though other officials downplayed the idea. The report also said they are hoping Maduro negotiates an exit or members of Venezuela’s military assassinate him to collect the US bounty.

This article originally appeared at Antiwar.com.