More Than 100 People Killed by US Bombing Campaign Against Alleged Drug Boats

(Dave DeCamp, Antiwar.comThe US bombing campaign against alleged drug-running boats in the waters of Latin America has killed more than 100 people, according to the numbers released by the Trump administration and the US military.

The latest strikes were announced by the US Southern Command on December 18 and targeted boats in the Eastern Pacific Ocean. According to SOUTHCOM, the strikes killed five “narco-terrorists,” a term the administration uses to justify executing people at sea without a trial for a suspected crime that doesn’t receive the death penalty in the US.

Video of the latest strikes released by SOUTHCOM

The bombings bring the total number of people extra-judicially executed since the campaign started in early September to 104. A total of 28 strikes have been launched, and 29 boats have been blown up, including 11 in the Caribbean and 18 in the Eastern Pacific.

The bombing campaign began off the coast of Venezuela and started as part of the Trump administration’s pressure campaign aimed at ousting Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro, and recently escalated into a blockade on tankers entering and leaving Venezuelan ports.

The Pentagon has never shown any evidence to back up its claims about what the boats it has bombed are carrying and has acknowledged to Congress that it doesn’t know all of the identities of the people it has been killing.

This article originally appeared at Antiwar.com.

 

Trump Endorses Congressman Who Allegedly Had Affair w/ Staffer Who Lit Herself on Fire

(Ken Silva, Headline USA) President Donald Trump has endorsed Rep. Tony Gonzales for re-election as the Texas congressman faces intense scrutiny for allegedly having an affair with a staffer who lit herself on fire and died in September.

“Tony knows the Wisdom and Courage that is required to Defend our Country, Support our Brave Military/Veterans, and Ensure PEACE THROUGH STRENGTH,” Trump said last week on Truth Social.

According to the Daily Mail, Gonzales’s staffer, Regina Aviles, 35, poured gasoline over herself before becoming engulfed in flames at her home on September 13 in Uvalde, Texas.

“Aviles and the married congressman became romantically involved after she joined his staff on November 21, 2021,” the Daily Mail reported at the time, citing anonymous sources.

“One source told the Daily Mail that their relationship continued ‘for some time’ and that Aviles’ husband, Adrian Aviles, was aware of the relationship at the time of her death. Two additional, separate sources also confirmed the alleged relationship with Gonzales.”

The Daily Mail added that a spokesman for Rep. Gonzales “refused to deny the affair when repeatedly offered the opportunity.”

Gonzales has since denied the affair, but has been tight-lipped about the staffer.

Initial reports didn’t specify how exactly Aviles died, other than by fire.

“Paramedics, firefighters and police responded to Santos-Aviles’ home around 9:30 p.m. Saturday for a disturbance,” local news site KSAT said, citing a police report.

Tragically, her last words were, “I don’t want to die,” her mother reportedly said.

It looks like more information won’t be forthcoming about her death. On Friday, the Texas Attorney General’s Office ruled that 911 calls from the incident will be kept sealed. Santos-Aviles’s husband was reportedly relieved by the decision.

“I’m so happy that the AG’s Office has recognized that this is a private family tragedy,” he said in a statement to KSAT on Friday. “Public disclosure would have obviously just been used for adverse political purposes.”

Ken Silva is the editor of Headline USA. Follow him at x.com/jd_cashless.

Deputy AG Explains Why Ghislaine Maxwell Was Moved to Cushy Prison Camp

(Ken Silva, Headline USA) On Sunday’s edition of Meet the Press, Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche said convicted sex trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell was moved to a minimum-security prison camp in July due to the death threats she had been receiving at the low-security prison where she was previously incarcerated.

Blanche’s explanation came in response to questions about the timing of Maxwell’s move. She was transferred from a low-security prison in Tallahassee, Florida to a minimum-security prison camp in Bryan, Texas, in July, after she provided an interview to the Justice Department about her accomplice, Jeffrey Epstein. Because she said in that interview that she never saw President Donald Trump commit any wrongdoing, some speculate that her transfer was a reward for clearing the president’s name.

Blanche claimed otherwise.

“I am responsible for the Bureau of Prisons, so every decision that they make lands on my desk,” he said. “At the institution she was in, she was suffering numerous, numerous threats.”

Blanche wasn’t pressed further on the favorable treatment Maxwell’s received at the Texas prison camp.

According to House Oversight Committee ranking member Jamie Raskin, “Maxwell’s meals have been customized and prepared by federal prison camp staff and then personally delivered to her in her cell by longtime federal employees.”

“An inmate who trains puppies to become service dogs was instructed to provide one to Maxwell for a time so she could play with the puppy, even though neither inmates nor staff are ordinarily allowed to pet the service dogs in training,” Raskin said in a letter to the Bureau of Prisons last month.

“When Ms. Maxwell wanted to go to the prison exercise area, she was personally escorted there after hours by prison guards so she could work out by herself and was allowed to enjoy recreation time in staff-only areas.”

According to Raskin, the preferential treatment is so bad that one Bryan prison official has complained that he is “sick of having to be Maxwell’s bitch.”

Raskin had asked FPC Bryan warden Tanisha Hall to contact his staff by Nov. 13 to coordinate a visit to Maxwell’s prison camp. He also asked a series of questions, including about the identities of the unknown people who met with Maxwell while other inmates were locked down in August.

It’s unclear whether Warden Hall ever responded, or if the visit took place.

Ken Silva is the editor of Headline USA. Follow him at x.com/jd_cashless.

Report: Biden-Harris Received $613 Million in Dark Money Last Year

(Ken Silva, Headline USA) Nearly $900 million in secretive donations funded the 2024 presidential election, with the majority of that “dark money” going to the Democrats’ Kamala Harris campaign, according to the New York Times.

The Times reported Wednesday that Future Forward USA Action, the super PAC backing Joseph Biden at first and then Harris, received $613 million from anonymous donors last year

“About $252 million of that money flowed into the candidates’ main super PAC, called FF PAC,” the Times reported.

“Strikingly, $515 million of the $613 million raised overall came from just the 10 largest donations, the biggest of which was for $97.5 million from an unidentified person or group.”

Trump’s main PAC, Securing American Greatness, received about $275 million.

“The largest donation to Securing American Greatness was for $35 million from an unidentified giver,” the Times added. “Its top 10 donations accounted for $163 million of its $275 million.”

The Times report comes as Democrats are campaigning on the notion that they don’t fundraise from “dark-money billionaires.” Last year’s race proves otherwise—though moving forward, some billionaires have pulled their support in the wake of Harris’s loss.

For instance, Bill Gates made a secretive $50 million donation to support Harris’s presidential run. But after Trump’s victory, he’s changed his tune.

The Microsoft co-founder told the Wall Street Journal in January that he recently spoke with Trump about global health challenges, and came away from the meeting impressed. Gates also tightened the purse strings on funding Democratic causes.

According to the Times, the Gates Foundation said in June that it’s not making any more grants to the consulting firm Arabella Advisors, which has long funded pro-Democrat groups. The Gates Foundation has reportedly pledged some $450 million to Arabella-associated groups over the last 16 years.

“The Gates Foundation said it would not make new investments with ‘Arabella-related entities,’ including a consulting firm bought by Arabella in 2023 called the Redstone Group. The foundation said it would not extend existing grants and would even try to ‘pursue early exits’ from a few long-term investments,” the Times reported in August.

According to the Times, Arabella disperses much of its money to Democrats through the New Venture Fund, which is a fiscal sponsor for 170 nonprofit projects. The New Venture Fund, in turn, sends much of that cash to a dark-money group called the Sixteen Thirty Fund, which has donated $97 million to Democratic super PACs, the Times reported.

Ken Silva is the editor of Headline USA. Follow him at x.com/jd_cashless.

Report: Netanyahu To Ask Trump To Support Another Attack on Iran

(Dave DeCamp, Antiwar.comIsraeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is expected to ask President Trump to support another US-Israeli war on Iran, according to an NBC News report from Saturday.

The report said that Netanyahu will stress Israel’s concern over Iran’s production of ballistic missiles and will present Trump with options for the US to join or assist Israel with an attack on Iran. Israeli officials are also warning that Iran is reconstituting its nuclear sites that were bombed by the US during the war in June, but that was not their immediate concern.

According to a report from Israel Hayom, Israeli officials are preparing an “intelligence dossier” on Iran to present to Trump. Netanyahu’s office has said the meeting will take place at Mar-a-Lago on December 29, though President Trump suggested last week that it wasn’t finalized, saying, “We haven’t set it up formally, but he’d like to see me.”

Trump and Netanyahu speak privately in the Vermeil Room before a dinner, Monday, July 7, 2025, at the White House. (Official White House Photo by Daniel Torok)

Trita Parsi, Executive Vice President of the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, has been warningthat another war with Iran was likely since Israel didn’t achieve all of its goals during its previous attack on the country, pointing to the fact that Iran’s missile strikes forced Israel to agree to a ceasefire quickly.

“The June war resulted in mutual deterrence, a situation Iran can accept, but one that is intolerable for Netanyahu and his legacy. Ultimately, the conflict was neither a victory for Israel nor for Iran,” Parsi wrote in Responsible Statecraft on Sunday, responding to the NBC report.

“It is precisely this balance of terror that prompts Israel to seek a new round – Israel’s military doctrine does not allow for any of its regional foes to deter it or challenge its military dominance. Iran’s missile program currently does exactly that,” Parsi added. “And this is precisely why Trump must say no to Netanyahu. Because Israel’s objective is not security in the conventional sense, but rather absolute dominance.”

Earlier this month, Trump suggested the US could destroy Iran’s ballistic missiles when a reporter said Iran was “reconstituting” its missile program. “Well, they can try, but it’s going to take them a long time to come back,” Trump said.

“But if they do want to come back and they want to come back without a deal, then we’re going to obliterate that one too. We can knock out their missiles very quickly. We have great power. And we helped Israel a lot. We were shooting down the drones. We were doing a lot of things for Israel. We did a good job for Israel. But Israel did a good job, they fought, they all fought bravely.”

This article originally appeared at Antiwar.com.

 

Watchdog Warns of National Debt Interest Payments Hitting $1 Trillion

(The Center Square) Budget watchdogs are sounding the alarm as the U.S. hit an unfortunate fiscal milestone in fiscal year 2025: government spending on debt interest payments alone topped $1 trillion this year.

The federal government added roughly $1.8 trillion to the now $38 trillion national debt in fiscal year 2025. While net interest on the debt totaled $970 billion, according to the Congressional Budget Office, the federal government’s net interest payments exceeded $1 trillion for the first time.

That’s more than the U.S. spends on national defense, almost as much as it spends on Medicare, and about two-thirds of what it spends on Social Security benefits.

Chris Towner from the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget said historically high interest payments – which are projected to rise to $1.8 trillion in 2035 – could cause a debt spiral in the future if Congress does not reign in spending.

“If we were to get into a situation where we have to keep borrowing, and then the people who loan us money get worried that we’re not going to pay it all back, we could see higher and higher interest rates – which means we have to borrow more to pay the interest on the debt, which means that the interest rates go higher, and that turns into what we call a debt spiral,” Towner told The Center Square.

“I hope we’re far away from that, but right now, we’re pretty close to the highest the debt that has ever been as a share of the economy, and that’s how economists think about it – the debt is equal to about 100% of the economy right now.”

The highest percentage the national debt has made up of Gross Domestic Product was 106%, and that was immediately following World War II. If it continues current borrowing rates, the U.S. will hit that level again within the next five years.

“We don’t really know what happens after that,” Towner said. “And what I fear is already starting to happen is that the higher debt we have, the slower the economy is growing. Every dollar that the federal government borrows results in about 33 cents less of investment in the economy from the private sector.”

The ripple effects of slowed economic growth are many, Towner added.

“Fewer buildings, fewer machines, being invested in fewer workers, being hired, all of that. And then what could happen, too, is interest rates could rise pretty significantly, because interest rates throughout the economy are really directly tied to how much it costs the government to borrow.”

Unlike other government spending, the $1 trillion spent on debt interest payments alone produces no benefits.

“So it’s a lot of money, and it’s basically something that we don’t get anything out of. It’s just to service our past borrowing,” Turner noted. “At least with Social Security, we’re sending that into people’s pocketbooks, or with Medicare, we’re mostly spending that on seniors’ medical bills. But we’re not getting anything for this interest. We’re just paying it because we borrowed so much.”

While there are ways Congress can address rampant spending while still protecting costly entitlement programs, Turner said, “there’s almost never going to be a politically painful overhaul.”

“We could actually pay for anything we wanted by raising taxes or just cutting any other spending,” Turner said, referencing ways to finance Democrats’ wish to extend the enhanced Obamacare Premium Tax Credits and Republicans’ desire to expand Health Savings Accounts.

“There are myriad ways to pay for the priorities we want to do. It’s just that whenever you cut spending or you raise revenue, you’re hurting someone’s pocketbook, so you’re going to get some disinterest in that.”

If lawmakers have no appetite to comb over entitlement programs for savings, there are still ways Congress can immediately address federal spending and lower both government borrowing and interest rates.

“We should be putting caps on discretionary spending,” Turner said. “But we also need to put together some sort of bipartisan fiscal commission that brings together Republicans and Democrats to talk about what are the right ways to make our finances sustainable, and what are the right ways to shore up Social Security and Medicare, which are both in danger of going insolvent in the next seven years. We need to act now to prevent that from happening.”

Illegal Immigrant Hits ICE Agent w/ SUV then Bites Another One

(Headline USAAn Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent fired shots Sunday at a Cuban immigrant living in the U.S. illegally after the man struck the agent and another one with an SUV in Minnesota’s state capital, the Department of Homeland Security said.

The man also bit an ICE agent as officers subdued him outside his apartment in St. Paul after he tried to flee on foot, Assistant Homeland Security Secretary Tricia McLaughlin said in an email.

The man wasn’t hurt, and the injuries received by the agents struck by the SUV were not life-threatening, though he and the agents were taken to the hospital for evaluation, McLaughlin said.

Tensions have been rising in the Minneapolis-St. Paul area as federal authorities continue an illegal immigration crackdown.

McLaughlin said the man detained Sunday entered the U.S. in 2024 through a now-discontinued program implemented by former President Joe Biden’s administration allowing migrants without proper entry papers into the country while their claims for asylum were reviewed.

The incident occurred Sunday morning. St. Paul police said in a statement that they were called to the area by reports of shots being fired, only to learn that the ICE agent had fired the shots.

ICE agents saw the man getting into his SUV and approached the vehicle, McLaughlin said, identifying themselves as ICE agents. When the man refused to roll down his window, they told him that they would break it if he continued not to comply, she said.

The man drove off, striking one agent, and went to a parking lot of his apartment complex, where agents stopped him again and ordered him out of the SUV, McLaughlin said. He rammed his SUV into an ICE vehicle, striking the second agent, prompting the shots, which did not hit him, she said.

After ramming another ICE vehicle, the man got out of his SUV and attempted to flee into his apartment, but agents brought him to the ground, McLaughlin said.

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

 

Nicki Minaj Surprises with Praise for Trump, Vance at Arizona Event

(Headline USAFemale rapper Nicki Minaj on Sunday made a surprise appearance at a gathering of conservatives in Arizona that was memorializing late activist Charlie Kirk, and used her time on stage to praise President Donald Trump and Vice President JD Vance, calling them “role models” for young men.

The rap star was interviewed at Turning Point USA’s AmericaFest convention by Erika Kirk, the widow of Charlie Kirk, about her newly found support for Trump — someone she had condemned in the past — and about her actions denouncing violence against Christians in Nigeria.

The female rapper’s recent alignment with the Make America Great Again movement has caught some interest because of her past criticism of Trump even when the artist’s own political ideology had been difficult to pin down. But her appearance Sunday at the flagship event for the powerful conservative youth organization may shore up her status as a MAGA acolyte.

Minaj mocked California Gov. Gavin Newsom, referring to him as New-scum, a nickname Trump gave him. Newsom, a Democrat, has 2028 prospects. Minaj expressed admiration for the Republican president and Vance, who received an endorsement from Erika Kirk despite the fact he has not said whether he will run for president. Kirk took over as leader of Turning Point.

“This administration is full of people with heart and soul, and they make me proud of them. Our vice president, he makes me … well, I love both of them,” Minaj said. “Both of them have a very uncanny ability to be someone that you relate to.”

Minaj’s appearance included an awkward moment when, in an attempt to praise Vance’s political skills, she described him as an “assassin.”

She paused, seemingly regretting her word choice, and after Kirk appeared to wipe a tear from one of her eyes, the artist put her hand over her mouth while the crowd murmured.

“If the internet wants to clip it, who cares? I love this woman,” said Erika Kirk, who became a widow when Charlie Kirk was assassinated in September.

Last month, the rapper shared a message posted by Trump on his Truth Social network about potential actions to sanction Nigeria saying the government is failing to rein in the persecution of Christians in the West African country. Experts and residents say the violence that has long plagued Nigeria isn’t so simply explained.

“Reading this made me feel a deep sense of gratitude. We live in a country where we can freely worship God,” Minaj shared on X. She was then invited to speak at a panel at the U.S. mission to the United Nations along with U.S. Ambassador Mike Waltz and faith leaders.

Minaj said she was tired of being “pushed around,” and she said that speaking your mind with different ideas is controversial because “people are no longer using their minds.” Kirk thanked Minaj for being “courageous,” despite the backlash she is receiving from the entertainment industry for expressing support for Trump.

“I didn’t notice,” Minaj said. “We don’t even think about them.” Kirk then said “we don’t have time to. We’re too busy building, right?”

“We’re the cool kids,” Minaj said.

The Trinidadian-born rapper is best known for her hits “Super Freaky Girl,” “Anaconda” and “Starships.” She has been nominated for 12 Grammy Awards over the course of her career.

In 2018, Minaj was one of several celebrities condemning Trump’s zero-tolerance immigration policy that split more than 5,000 children from their families at the Mexico border. Back then, she shared her own story of arriving to the country at 5 years old, describing herself as an “illegal immigrant.”

“This is so scary to me. Please stop this. Can you try to imagine the terror & panic these kids feel right now?” she posted then on Instagram.

On Sunday on stage with Erika Kirk, Minaj said, “it’s OK to change your mind.”

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

 

DC Police Chief Blames Subordinates for Cooked Numbers in Farewell Speech

(Luis CornelioHeadline USA) Pam Smith, the outgoing chief of D.C.’s Metropolitan Police Department, delivered a fiery farewell speech Friday in which she appeared to pin blame on subordinates for reportedly manipulating crime data. 

“The same folks who said in that report that they changed their numbers … and the report is very clear, I did not direct anyone, you should investigate those folks,” Smith said at the MPD headquarters, as quoted first in WUSA9. 

Her comments addressed accusations from the House Oversight Committee and U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro that the MPD systematically manipulated data to make crime appear lower.

House Republicans said police commanders “were berated for reporting rising crime and pressured, both in meetings and in separate individual sessions, to lower reported crime figures.”  

Minutes later, Smith erupted.

“‘F’ you!” she said, claiming the “f” word was a reference to Jesus Christ. 

“I forgive you. Because the Bible makes it very clearly when Jesus was hanging on the cross when he said to us … even in the pit of agony and defeat, he said, ‘Father, forgive them for they know not what they do.’” 

Directly addressing federal investigators, she stated early in her speech: “Never would I, never will I compromise my integrity for a few crime numbers.”

“How dare you? How dare you? How dare you attack my integrity? Attack my character. You don’t know who I belong to,” she continued. 

Smith, who announced her resignation earlier this year, was appointed as MPD chief in 2023 after previously joining the department in 2022 as its chief equity officer. 

Minnesota AG Faults Carmakers for Thefts Instead of Criminals

(Luis CornelioHeadline USA) Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison came under fire for blaming two car manufacturers for a surge in vehicle thefts across the state, with critics arguing the problem stemmed from lenient, soft-on-crime policies instead. 

The backlash followed Ellison’s framing of a multi-state settlement, in which he claimed Minnesota faced a “crisis,” describing it as a “public safety epidemic of vehicle thefts, financial harm to consumers, injury and tragically, even deaths.” 

On X, critics mocked Ellison’s remarks, particularly given his reputation as a soft-on-crime prosecutor and his alleged failure to crack down on one of the largest COVID-19 relief fraud schemes to date. 

“Minnesota AG Ellison blames car theft in his state on Kia and Hyundai being too easy to steal…” the X account End Wokeness wrote while sharing a clip of Ellison’s comments, which garnered nearly half a million views. 

National Review senior writer Dan McLaughlin responded, “My favorite anti-theft device is jail.” 

Rep. Mike Collins, R-Ga., added bluntly, “I’d blame the criminals.” 

National syndicated radio host Anthony Cumia echoed these sentiments, writing, “They will never take responsibility for their shit behavior.” 

Ellison’s comments followed a settlement between Hyundai and Kia and a coalition of 35 states plus the District of Columbia, after Minnesota launched an investigation into the automakers’ weak anti-theft technology. 

The settlement includes up to $4.5 million in restitution for eligible consumers and an additional $4.5 million for states that investigated the thefts. 

The car theft trend went viral on social media after the so-called “Kia Boys” began posting videos purportedly showing how easily they stole certain Kia and Hyundai models. 

According to the Minnesota Attorney General’s Office, thefts involving Kia and Hyundai were linked to at least five homicides, 13 shootings and 36 robberies. 

“These are not just numbers; they represent a public safety crisis that has caused substantial and serious harm to the people of Minnesota,” the office said in a statement. 

Ellison claimed the thefts were the product of automakers failing to implement anti-theft technology that was made available in vehicles sold in Mexico and Canada. 

Several Republican attorneys general joined the lawsuit, including those of New Hampshire, Florida, Georgia, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma and South Dakota.