Meta Official Says 2020 Election Interference Was ‘Not Enough’

(Dmytro “Henry” Aleksandrov, Headline USA) A member of Meta’s oversight board said during a recent interview that the Big Tech company “had not done enough” to control users’ speech back in 2020, even though it did everything possible to radically change the outcome of the last presidential election and enforce its censorship tactics after that.

Board member Pamela San Martín claimed in a Wired interview that was published on Jan. 26, 2024, that as the tech platform enters 2024, “even though we’re addressing the problems that arose in prior elections as a starting point, it is not enough.”

“Between the U.S. election [in 2020] to the Brazilian election [in 2022], Meta had not done enough to address the potential misuse of its platforms through coordinated campaigns, people organizing or using bots on the platforms to convey a message to destabilize a country, to create a lack of trust or confidence on electoral processes,” she said.

However, as previous years showed, the Big Tech company was doing everything in its power to change the results of the 2020 election and shut up every dissenter by censoring the Hunter Biden laptop story, removing Donald Trump’s campaign ad, suspending his Facebook and Instagram accounts, and making sure that everyone who thought that the 2020 election was stolen wouldn’t be able to express his views, the Federalist reported.

Despite all of that, San Martín still thought that it wasn’t enough.

“Social media platforms need to learn from past mistakes to be able to address them better this year,” she said.

San Martín then listed other censorship techniques that Meta already tested out in “different countries” and plans to use in 2024. Among them are “working with electoral authorities, adding labels to posts that are related to elections, directing people to reliable information, prohibiting paid advertisement when it calls into question the legitimacy of elections and implementing WhatsApp forward limits.”

She then acknowledged “how [Meta’s] own algorithms, their newsfeeds, their recommendation systems, their political ads can play a part” in the “protection” of “electoral processes,” adding that she wants to see more of it, not less.

Fani Willis Fired Whistleblower Who Warned of Misusing Fed. Funds

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) Embattled Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis fired a whistleblower who had raised concerns about the potential illegal misuse of federal funds, the Washington Free Beacon reported on Wednesday. 

Amanda Timpson said she was ousted after alerting Willis to allegations that one of her top campaign aides, Michael Cuffee, wanted to misuse a substantial $488,000 federal grant designated for a Center of Youth Empowerment and Gang Prevention. 

According to Free Beacon, Timpson declared that Cuffee plotted to divert towards “swag,” laptops and likely personal travel expenses. 

In an interview with the Free Beacon, Timpson asserted, “My case and Nathan Wade’s case are very similar when you break them down point by point. Ethical violations, abuse of power, and the misuse of county, state, and federal funds.” 

Timpson, a member of the Fulton County District Attorney’s Executive Leadership, secretly recorded a conversation with Willis detailing the potential illegal plan. Willis did not condemn the allegations in the audio, opting instead to dismiss Timpson a few weeks after their recorded conversation. 

“He wanted to do things with grants that were impossible, and I kept telling him, like, ‘We can’t do that,'” a distraught Timpson informed Willis on Nov. 19, 2021, according to the audio released by the Free Beacon. 

“He told everybody … ‘We’re going to get MacBooks, we’re going to get swag, we’re going to use it for travel.’ I said, ‘You cannot do that, it’s a very, very specific grant,'” Timpson added. 

A seemingly unbothered Willis replied: “I respect that is your assessment–and I’m not saying that your assessment is wrong.”  

In the audio, Timpson informed Willis that Cuffee dismissed her concerns, assuring her that Willis would merely inform him of the whistleblower’s complaints. However, Willis contended that Cuffee had “failed” her administration. Despite this, the district attorney abruptly fired Timpson in January 2022. 

Willis allegedly summoned seven armed men to escort Timpson out of her office. “I am 4’11” on my best day,” Timpson said. “Who is so scared of me that you have to walk me out of the building by seven armed investigators? I’ve never had a warning about any negative behavior that would warrant someone feeling threatened by me.”

The individual accused of attempting to misuse federal funds left Fulton County’s office in 2021 for “personal” reasons. Additionally, Timpson filed a whistleblower complaint in 2023 against Willis. In response to the complaint, Willis’s office labeled Timpson as a “holdover from the prior administration.” 

These allegations surface as ethical concerns surrounding Willis disrupt her criminal case against former President Donald Trump and 18 other co-defendants, accused of alleged illegal efforts to question the results of the 2020 presidential election in Georgia. 

Willis appointed Nathan Wade, a special prosecutor, to lead the criminal charges against Trump and the co-defendants. However, Willis never disclosed that Wade, reportedly her lover, financed several vacation trips with funds received from his taxpayer-funded salary from Willis’s office. 

Zuckerberg Grilled over Child Abuse in Rare Bipartisan Senate Hearing

(Headline USA) Sexual predators. Addictive features. Suicide and eating disorders. Unrealistic beauty standards. Bullying. These are just some of the issues young people are dealing with on social media—and children’s advocates and lawmakers say companies are not doing enough to protect them.

On Wednesday, the CEOs of Meta, TikTok, Twitter and other social-media companies went before the Senate Judiciary Committee to testify at a time when lawmakers and parents are growing increasingly concerned about the effects of social media on young people’s lives.

The hearing began with recorded testimony from kids and parents who said they or their children were exploited on social media. Throughout the hourslong event, parents who lost children to suicide silently held up pictures of their dead kids.

“They’re responsible for many of the dangers our children face online,” Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin, who chairs the committee, said in opening remarks. “Their design choices, their failures to adequately invest in trust and safety, their constant pursuit of engagement and profit over basic safety have all put our kids and grandkids at risk.”

In a heated question and answer session with Mark Zuckerberg, Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., asked the Meta CEO if he has personally compensated any of the victims and their families for what they have been through.

“I don’t think so,” Zuckerberg replied.

“There’s families of victims here,” Hawley said. “Would you like to apologize to them?”

Zuckerberg stood, turned away from his microphone and the senators, and directly addressed the parents in the gallery.

“I’m sorry for everything you have all been through. No one should go through the things that your families have suffered,” he said, adding that Meta continues to invest and work on “industrywide efforts” to protect children.

But time and time again, children’s advocates and parents have stressed that none of the companies are doing enough.

One of the parents who attended the hearing was Neveen Radwan, whose teenage daughter got sucked in to a “black hole of dangerous content” on TikTok and Instagram after she started looking at videos on healthy eating and exercise at the onset of the COVID lockdowns. She developed anorexia within a few months and nearly died, Radwan recalled.

“Nothing that was said today was different than what we expected,” Radwan said. “It was a lot of promises and a lot of, quite honestly, a lot of talk without them really saying anything. The apology that he made, while it was appreciated, it was a little bit too little, too late, of course.”

But Radwan, whose daughter is now 19 and in college, said she felt a “significant shift” in the energy as she sat through the hearing, listening to the senators grill the social media CEOs in tense exchanges.

“The energy in the room was, very, very palpable. Just by our presence there, I think it was very noticeable how our presence was affecting the senators,” she said.

Hawley continued to press Zuckerberg, asking if he’d take personal responsibility for the harms his company has caused. Zuckerberg stayed on message and repeated that Meta’s job is to “build industry-leading tools” and empower parents.

“To make money,” Hawley cut in.

Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., the top Republican on the Judiciary panel, echoed Durbin’s sentiments and said he was prepared to work with Democrats to solve the issue.

“After years of working on this issue with you and others, I’ve come to conclude the following: Social media companies as they’re currently designed and operate are dangerous products,” Graham said.

The executives touted existing safety tools on their platforms and the work they’ve done with nonprofits and law enforcement to protect minors.

Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, called out Zuckerberg over a prompt on Instagram that allowed individuals searching for “child-abuse material” to “see results anyway” even after warning users of the harmful content.

“Mr. Zuckerberg, what the hell were you thinking?” Cruz asked.

Snapchat broke ranks ahead of the hearing and is backing a federal bill that would create a legal liability for apps and social platforms that recommend harmful content to minors. Snap CEO Evan Spiegel reiterated the company’s support on Wednesday and asked the industry to back the bill.

TikTok CEO Shou Zi Chew said his company was vigilant about enforcing its policy barring children under 13 from using the app.

Twitter CEO Linda Yaccarino said the microblogging platform doesn’t cater to children.

“We do not have a line of business dedicated to children,” Yaccarino said. She said the company will also support Stop CSAM Act, a federal bill that makes it easier for victims of child exploitation to sue tech companies.

However, Headline USA has previously exposed evidence of suspected child pornography from a convicted pedophile on Twitter. As of Thursday morning, the content remained posted on his account, more than 15 months since it was initially flagged.

Child health advocates say social media companies have failed repeatedly to protect minors.

Profits should not be the primary concern when companies are faced with safety and privacy decisions, said Zamaan Qureshi, co-chair of Design It For Us, a youth-led coalition advocating for safer social media. “These companies have had opportunities to do this before they failed to do that. So independent regulation needs to step in.”

Republican and Democratic senators came together in a rare show of agreement throughout the hearing, though it’s not yet clear if this will be enough to pass legislation such as the Kids Online Safety Act, proposed in 2022 by Sens. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., and Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn.

“There is pretty clearly a bipartisan consensus that the status quo isn’t working,” said New Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez, a Democrat. “When it comes to how these companies have failed to prioritize the safety of children, there’s clearly a sense of frustration on both sides of the aisle.”

Meta is being sued by dozens of states that say it deliberately designs features on Instagram and Facebook that addict children to its platforms. New Mexico filed a separate lawsuit saying the company has failed to protect them from online predators.

New internal emails between Meta executives released by Blumenthal’s office show Nick Clegg, the company’s president of global affairs, and others asking Zuckerberg to hire more people to strengthen “wellbeing across the company” as concerns grew about effects on youth mental health.

“From a policy perspective, this work has become increasingly urgent over recent months. Politicians in the U.S., U.K., E.U. and Australia are publicly and privately expressing concerns about the impact of our products on young people’s mental health,” Clegg wrote in an August 2021 email.

The emails released by Blumenthal’s office don’t appear to include a response, if there was any, from Zuckerberg.

In September 2021, the Wall Street Journal released the Facebook Files, its report based on internal documents from whistleblower Frances Haugen, who later testified before the Senate.

Clegg followed up on the August email in November with a scaled-down proposal but it does not appear that anything was approved.

“I’ve spoken to many of the parents at the hearing. The harm their children experienced, all that loss of innocent life, is eminently preventable,” said Arturo Béjar, a former engineering director at the social media giant known for his expertise in curbing online harassment who recently testified before Congress about child safety on Meta’s platforms.

“When Mark says ‘Our job is building the best tools we can,’ that is just not true,” Béjar added. “They know how much harm teens are experiencing, yet they won’t commit to reducing it, and most importantly to be transparent about it. They have the infrastructure to do it, the research, the people, it is a matter of prioritization.”

Béjar said the emails and Zuckerberg’s testimony show that Meta and its CEO “do not care about the harm teens experience” on their platforms.

“Nick Clegg writes about profound gaps with addiction, self-harm, bullying and harassment to Mark,” Béjar said.

“Mark did not respond, and those gaps are unaddressed today,” he continued. “… Children are not his priority.”

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

Truck Convoy Protesting Biden’s Open Border May Draw More than 700K People

(Headline USA) A trucker convoy protesting the Biden administration’s open-border policies said it expects to draw nearly 700,000 people to its rallies as it makes its way from Virginia to Eagle Pass, Texas, according to the New York Post.

The group, which calls itself the Take Our Border Back convoy, said they organized the trucking protest to draw attention to the border crisis and force the Biden administration to take action. Heading out from Virginia, the convoy stopped in Jacksonville, Florida, on Monday and added several more trucks to the protest.

“To the naysayers: We’re just ordinary citizens, farmers, ranchers, retired police officers. Not crazy conspiracy theorists,” said organizer Kim Yeater. “It will be a peaceful assembly of Americans of all political classes and all ethnicities.”

The protest called to mind earlier convoys, the most notable of which was the Canadian Freedom Convoy, a protest over COVID shutdowns that wreaked havoc in the capital city of Ottawa in February 2022, prompting authoritarian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau to freeze the protesters’ bank accounts, among other blatant violations of civil liberties.

An American counterpart, the People’s Convoy, made its way up to Washington, D.C. and proceeded to clog the capital Beltway for several days before fizzling out.

Yeater said that truckers weren’t the only ones participating in the border protest—nor were Americans the only participants.

“We’ve got Canadian truckers, moms and dads. We’ve got motorcycles. If people could bring horses they’d bring horses,” she said. “I know the numbers we are looking at are 700,000. I think it’ll possibly be bigger than that.”

A second convoy will depart from California this week and head to Yuma, Arizona, another area that has become a focal point of the border crisis.

Once they arrive, the Take Our Border Back convoy plans to hold a rally near the border in Eagle Pass. The goal of the demonstration is to “shine the spotlight on open borders and educate Americans of imminent dangers to all Americans,” Yeater said.

The organizer added that several Americans who have been directly impacted by the consequences of illegal immigration will be at the rally to share their stories.

“I have moms [who will speak on Saturday] speaking of children who died from fentanyl,” she said.

“I have one whose child was killed by an illegal immigrant who had crossed that border multiple times,” Yeater added. “She just left the cemetery yesterday, on what would have been his birthday.”

Yeater also warned that the convoy would not put up with “infiltrators” or “disruptors,” saying those who tried to interfere with the peaceful event would be “handed over to authorities.”

Cori Bush Dismisses Federal Probe into Alleged Misuse of Funds as ‘Right-Wing’ Attack

(Headline USA) “Squad” Rep. Cori Bush, D-Mo., wrote off the Biden Justice Department’s investigation into her alleged misuse of federal and campaign funds as a “right-wing” attack this week.

News broke on Tuesday that federal investigators were looking into whether Bush improperly spent campaign funds on security by hiring her now-husband, Cortney Merritts, whom she married in February 2023.

Bush added Merritts to her campaign’s payroll in January 2022 for his “security” services, but then changed the description of his salary to “wage expenses” in April 2022.

Bush claimed in a statement on Tuesday that the use of campaign funds was legitimate, arguing she was entitled to security services.

“Since before I was sworn into office, I have endured relentless threats to my physical safety and life, she claimed.

“As a rank-and-file member of Congress, I am not entitled to personal protection by the House, and instead have used campaign funds as permissible to retain security services,” she added. “I have not used any federal tax dollars for personal security services.”

Bush claimed the investigation into her finances were the result of “right-wing organizations” lodging “baseless complaints against me, peddling notions that I have misused campaign funds to pay for personal security services.”

Those allegations are “simply not true,” Bush insisted, claiming that she had “complied with all applicable laws and House rules—and will continue to prioritize the rules that govern us as federal elected officials.”

Two Federal Election Commission complaints have been filed against Bush over the security payments she made to Merritts, both of which cited the fact that he does not have a license to perform security functions in Bush’s congressional district.

On Monday, a House clerk announced that House Sergeant at Arms William McFarland received a grand-jury subpoena for documents issued by the Justice Department and added that McFarland’s office would comply with that subpoena. Those documents were reportedly connected to Bush’s alleged misuse of campaign funds.

Although precedent has long held that lawmakers could continue to serve in their elected capacity up until the time of a criminal conviction, the recent move, led by House Democrats, to expel ex-Rep. George Santos, R-N.Y., could signal trouble for Bush should the probe escalate further.

Santos likewise was accused of campaign-finance abuses and other financial crimes. He was indicted by the DOJ but has yet to face trial.

He was, nonetheless, ousted following a damning report by the House Ethics Committee, becoming the first Republican ever to be expeled from the chamber, and only the sixth House member in U.S. history to be voted out.

At least one other far-left Democrat lawmaker, Rep. Sheila Cherfilus–McCormick, D-Fla., is currently under investigation by House Ethics Committee for alleged campaign-finance fraud.

Sen. Bob Menendez, D-N.J., has been indicted by the DOJ on several counts of bribery and related crimes but has thus far defied bipartisan calls to resign.

Headline USA’s Ben Sellers contributed to this report.

ATF Whistleblowers Warn of Impending Regulation to Ban Private Gun Sales

(Ken Silva, Headline USA) The whistleblower advocacy group Empower Oversight released shocking allegations Wednesday that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives has drafted a 1,300-page document attempting to justify a rule pursuing citizens for the private sale of firearms.

Citing sources within the ATF, Empower Oversight said the document is reportedly being overseen by Senior Policy Counsel Eric Epstein, who worked as the Phoenix Field Office’s Division Counsel during Operation Wide Receiver—a precursor of Operation Fast and Furious, which saw the ATF flooding the streets with illegal guns as part of a supposed investigation into organized crime.

“The fact that inside ATF sources are blowing the whistle on this draft rule is an indication of what a difficult position it would put the ATF in. ATF agents did not sign up to go after law-abiding citizens for private sales protected under the Second Amendment of the Constitution,” said Empower Oversight President Tristan Leavitt.

Leavitt wrote an open letter to Attorney General Merrick Garland and ATF Director Steven Dettelbach, expressing concerns about their gun-grabbing plot.

“Such an expansive rule that treats all private citizens the same as federal firearms licensees would circumvent the separation of powers in the Constitution, which grants ‘all legislative Powers’ to Congress while requiring that the President ‘take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed.’  To the extent such a rule prevents the private sale of firearms, it would also clearly violate the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution,” Leavitt’s letter said.

“Nor would such a rule only hurt law-abiding firearms owners,” he said.

“The lessons of the Ruby Ridge and Waco standoffs should make clear that attempting to enforce such an expansive regulation could endanger countless ATF field agents who are forced to serve as the face of the Biden Administration in going after private firearms owners for constitutionally-protected firearms sales.”

Empower Oversight has filed a Freedom of Information Act for more details about the impending ATF regulation. The group seeks all internal government communications about the regulation, including any emails using the terms “ban,” “private sale,” “universal background,” and “gun control.”

Ken Silva is a staff writer at Headline USA. Follow him at twitter.com/jd_cashless.

Former Trump Official in Critical Condition after Being Shot in D.C. Carjacking

(Molly Bruns, Headline USA) Former Trump administration official Mike Gill was shot in the head Monday during a deadly carjacking in Washington D.C. and remains in critical condition, according to the Post Millennial.

Gill, a husband and father of three children, was about to pick up his wife from work around 5:45 p.m. on Monday when the assailant shot him in his vehicle.

Gill managed to exit his vehicle and collapsed on the sidewalk just outside of his car.

“We can confirm that Mike Gill was the victim of a shooting at the 900 block of K Street Northwest on Monday evening and is in critical condition,” a spokesperson for the family said. “Out of respect for the family, we have nothing additional to add at this time.”

The location put Gill less than a mile from the White House at the time of the attack.

From October 2016 to November 2019, Gill served under former presidents Barack Obama and Donald Trump as the chief operations officer for the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. He is currently the senior vice president for capital markets at the Housing Policy Council.

The suspected shooter killed a second driver, Alberto Vasquez Jr., in his spree, even after Vasquez complied with the demand to hand over the keys to his vehicle, the New York Daily News reported.

“They gave up the keys and, for whatever reason, the guy still shot him and ended up killing my son,” Vazquez’s mother, Antoinette Walker, told NBC Washington.

The culprit was later shot to death by police in New Carrolton, Maryland, after approaching them with two firearms.

Officials reported that the suspect was likely suffering from a mental breakdown, and did not start the carjacking spree for material gain, according to the Daily Wire.

However it follows several other recent scares involving political figures as the nation’s capital, under the stewardship of Democrat Mayor Muriel Bowser, experiences a horrifying surge in violent crime.

Rep. Henry Cuellar, D-Texas, was carjacked by three armed attackers in October outside of his apartment building in the city’s Navy Yard area, less than a mile from the U.S. Capitol.

And Rep. Angie Craig, D-Minn., was assaulted by a homeless man last February while riding in an elevator in her apartment building.

Fortunately, members of the Biden family—including the president’s extended family—have nothing to fear due to their elite status. Naomi Biden, the eldest daughter of Hunter Biden and granddaughter to President Joe Biden, endured a scare in November outside her Georgetown residence after the Secret Service fired on three individuals who were attempting to break into their unmarked vehicle.

Bowser reassured the public that there was “no ongoing threat” pertaining to the attack on Gill during a press conference Tuesday with officials from D.C.’s Metropolitan Police Department Tuesday.

“The violence we saw yesterday was senseless and tragic and we know that two families are experiencing an unimaginable tragedy,” she said.

It was unclear whether Bowser was referring to Gill or to the yet-unnamed assailant who died as a result of the crime spree.

Twitter users demanded for justice for Gill and the other victims, calling out high-ranking officials for ignoring D.C.’s rising crime rates.

“U.S. Attorney Matthew Graves would rather prosecute J6 protestors every single day instead of prosecuting violent criminals,” tweeted Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga. “No one is safe in Washington DC.”

 

“Is D.C. turning into crime central?” said Twitter user Oscar Herrera. “That’s our capital.”

“Obviously DC needs more anti gun laws for criminals to violate,” another user said. “If decent people could defend themselves there it would quickly become a much safer place.”

Headline USA’s Ben Sellers contributed to this report.

WATCH: Top White House Official Trashes Kamala, Admits Biden’s Health is Declining

(Ken Silva, Headline USA) Undercover journalist James O’Keefe released one of his juiciest scoops to date on Wednesday, publishing footage of a senior White House official who unwittingly admitted that Joe Biden’s health is in decline, Kamala Harris is highly unlikeable and Michelle Obama will not be running for President.

The White House official in question is Charlie Kraiger, who’s reportedly a cybersecurity policy analyst and foreign affairs desk officer at the White House.

Kraiger apparently thought he was on a date with O’Keefe, whose dark-rimmed glasses and died hair somehow fooled the security expert. Sipping on a glass of wine, Kraiger spilled secrets about the gossip happening behind closed doors at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.

When O’Keefe asked Kraiger whether Biden has dementia, he said no—but admitted the President’s mental health decline is obvious.

“I don’t think he has that clinically yet, but he’s definitely slowing down,” Kraiger said.

“Do they get that?” O’Keefe asked, prompting Kraiger to say: “They probably do, but no one in modern history has ever said, like, ‘We’re not going to renominate the President for a second term.’”

Kraiger had harsher words for Harris.

“She will be the vice president nominee. There was a debate about removing her from the ticket, but sadly they didn’t. She’s not popular, but you can’t remove the first black lady to be vice president from the Goddamn presidential ticket,” he said.

“Like what kind of message are you going to send to like African American voters … People would be like, ‘What the f—?’ Like she’s a woman and she’s multiracial.”

Kraiger added that either Biden or Harris should be replaced, but that’s not likely to happen. He also said that presidential dark horse Michelle Obama has no plans on running.

“I had a meeting with Michelle Obama … Someone asked her, ‘Will you ever run for office?’ And she said, ‘No,’ empathically. She was like, ‘I’ve seen all this shit my husband has had to go through and that does not interest me,’” he said.

After having enough gossip, O’Keefe took off his glasses and revealed his true identity.

“What would people think about the cybersecurity specialist at the White House sitting across the table from James O’Keefe?” the undercover journalist asked.

Kraiger insisted that the White House’s cybersecurity is top notch before leaving the restaurant.

O’Keefe said he’ll release more footage Thursday about their interactions after his true identity was known.

Ken Silva is a staff writer at Headline USA. Follow him at twitter.com/jd_cashless.

Trump Gets a ‘Sugar Brother’ as GOP Megadonor Assists w/ Absurd Legal Fees

(Jacob Bruns, Headline USA) Hotel mogul Robert Bigelow said Tuesday that he had donated $1 million to help former President Donald Trump with his legal fees as the verdicts in two partisan lawfare attacks being waged in New York threaten to deplete the GOP presidential frontrunner of a large portion of his personal wealth.

Bigelow, the Las Vegas-based owner of Budget Suites of America, also pledged a much larger fund to one of Trump’s affiliated campaign groups, Reuters reported.

“I gave him $1 million towards his legal fees a few weeks ago,” he said. “I made a promise to give him $20 million more, that will be to the super PAC.”

It follows a March 2023 donation he made of just over $20 million to the Ron DeSantis-affiliated Never Back Down super PAC, according to OpenSecrets.

Bigelow—whose net worth is currently estimated to be between $700 million and $1 billion—said he felt bad for the former president.

“I was just sympathetic. They didn’t solicit anything from me,” Bigelow said. The $20 million would be spread out but “starts right away.”

Bigelow said he had a pleasant dinner with Trump Monday night to talk over his legal and financial situation.

“It was supposed to be one hour. It was over two hours. And we still ran out of time,” he said.

Depending on the success of Trump’s appeals, however, the $1 million will not go far in covering the massive expenditures that he faces.

Recently, for instance, a jury awarded serial rape accuser E. Jean Carroll with $83 million over allegations that Trump had defamed her while fending off her claims about a more than 30-year-old sexual assault.

He also faces an impending ruling from judge Arthur Engoron, who may determine that Trump is on the hook for $370 million in penalties, based on alleged misrepresentation of his net worth, in a civil lawsuit being prosecuted by New York Attorney General Letitia James.

In 2023 alone, Trump spent more than $50 million on legal fees, the New York Times reported, with no end in sight for 2024.

Excluding the political efforts to keep him off the ballot in Colorado and Maine, for which he may tap into his sizable campaign war chest, the former president has yet to endure at least four major cases in the coming year, with 91 criminal charges stemming from indictments by leftist prosecutors in Georgia, Florida, New York and the District of Columbia.

Following Bigelow’s acknowledgement of the donation, David Cay Johnston, author of the 2022 book The Big Cheat : How Donald Trump Fleeced America and Enriched Himself and His Family,” mocked Trump for allegedly begging for money in a Tuesday CNN appearance, the Huffington Post reported.

“Remember Donald used to tell us he was worth $10 billion?” Johnston said. “He should be rolling in money if that’s the case. And evidently, he has to depend on begging for money from people.”

Trump isn’t the only high-profile figure with a political benefactor. Hunter Biden, the son of president Joe Biden, currently faces at least two major criminal cases of his own in Delaware and California, in addition to a deposition before the House Oversight and Judicial committees who are leading an impeachment probe against his father.

During the legal proceedings over Biden’s alleged tax fraud, it came to light that a billionaire pal, Kevin Morris, aka Biden’s “sugar brother,” had “loaned” the troubled ex-drug-addict at least $6.5 million to cover delinquent taxes ahead of the 2020 election.

Morris also said during a House deposition that he currently held Biden’s 10% stake in BHR Partners, a joint business venture with Chinese officials that has come under scrutiny amid allegations of illegal money-laundering and influence peddling while Joe Biden was vice president.

Headline USA’s Ben Sellers contributed to this report.

Rep. LaHood Pushes to Renew FISA Tool Used by FBI to Spy on Him

(Ken Silva, Headline USA) Last March, Darin LaHood, R-Ill., shocked onlookers when he revealed that he was the target of warrantless surveillance by the FBI.

LaHood’s revelation came on the heels of a newly in released government audit, which said that the FBI searched a U.S. congressman’s name in data obtained via Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act—the statute that allows U.S. agencies to target foreigners for intelligence purposes.

But nearly a year later, LaHood gave a full-throated defense of FISA Section 702, saying at a Wednesday congressional hearing that it’s crucial for national security. Section 702—the controversial law that allows agencies to spy on foreigners, but which often results in the surveillance of Americans’ communications—is set to expire on April 19 unless reauthorized by Congress.

“I want to focus my remarks on the importance of reauthorizing Section 702 of FISA,” LaHood said during a congressional hearing on the “threat” posed by China.

“I would argue it’s of existential importance to this country from a national-security standpoint,” said LaHood, who has also recently voted to give the FBI a new building.

LaHood then gave the floor to FBI Director Chris Wray, who was testifying at the hearing. Wray agreed with LaHood and said his FISA powers should be expanded.

“Section 702 is the greatest tool to combat PRC [People’s Republic of China]-sponsored hacking groups,” Wray said.

According to the FBI director, failing to renew Section 702—or renewing it with more civil liberties safeguards—would be a form of “unilateral disarmament.”

“China isn’t tying hands behind its back. It’s going the other way, and we need to do the same,” Wray said.

Section 702 of FISA was set to expire by the year’s end, and the House Judiciary Committee had recently passed a bill that would require agencies such as the FBI to obtain warrants before searching information collected about Americans under Section 702.

However, Wray and numerous other intelligence officials opposed warrant requirements. Caving to that pressure, senior congressional leaders snuck a provision to extend Section 702 until April in the National Defense Authorization Act, which funds the military every year.

Ken Silva is a staff writer at Headline USA. Follow him at twitter.com/jd_cashless.