Quantcast

Federal Judge Strikes Down California's Ammo-Sale Restrictions

‘If the state objective is to make it … impossible for its law-abiding citizens to purchase protected ammunition, then this law appears to be well-drafted…’

Louisiana A.G. Supports Gun Rights, Denies $600 Million to Citibank & BOA
Semi auto magazines with ammo (screen shot: Dirt Road/Youtube)

(Joshua Paladino, Liberty Headlines) A federal judge on Thursday blocked the enforcement of a California law that puts harsh restrictions on the purchase of ammunition.
With the passage of Proposition 63 and Senate Bill 1235 in 2016, Californians mandated that all ammunition buyers must pass a federal background check through a licensed ammunition vendor, reported the National Rifle Association‘s Institute for Legislative Action.
The law also prohibits online purchases of ammunition.
In Rhode v. Becerra, Judge Roger T. Benitez gave four reasons for granting a preliminary injunction that prevents the state “from implementing or enforcing the ammunition sales background check provisions.”
First, he wrote that “criminals, tyrants, and terrorists don’t do background checks,” while the restrictions “unduly and severely [burden] the Second Amendment rights” of gun owners.
Second, he wrote that “the implementing regulations systematically prohibit or deter an untold number of law-abiding California citizen–residents from undergoing the required background checks.”
Third, he wrote that California’s background check system has denied 16.4 percent of citizens the right to purchase ammunition who “are not prohibited persons.”
Fourth, he wrote that California does not have the authority to restrict interstate commerce. The anti-importation provision violates the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution.
The regulations on interstate ammunition sales took effect on Jan. 1, 2018.
The background-check law took effect on Jan. 1, 2019.
Benitez is the same judge who ruled against California’s ban on gun magazines that can hold more than 10 bullets.
“If the state objective is to make it extremely difficult, if not impossible, for its law-abiding citizens to purchase protected ammunition, then this law appears to be well-drafted,” Benitez wrote in his decision.
The plaintiff in the case, Kim Rhode, is an Olympic medalist who competes in skeet and double-trap shooting events, which require a lot of ammunition.
In the lawsuit, Rhode said California’s restrictions infringed on her right to buy the ammunition that she needs.

TRENDING NOW

Boston Ballot Box Set Ablaze in Apparent ‘Deliberate Attack’

(Headline USA) A fire was set Sunday in a Boston ballot drop box holding more than 120 ballots in what appears to have been...

Early Vote Total Exceeds 2016; GOP Outperforms Media Expectations

(Headline USA) With nine days before Election Day, more people already have cast ballots in this year's presidential election than voted early or absentee in...

Meadows Dismisses Dems’ Attempts to Hype Pre-Election COVID Spike

(Headline USA) As Democrats sought to hype another spike in coronavirus cases while hoping for a last-minute moon-shot to derail President Donald Trump's Election...

Senate Dems Try to Punish GOP Colleagues over Imminent SCOTUS Vote

(Headline USA) Senate Republicans voted overwhelmingly Sunday to advance Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett toward final confirmation despite Democratic objections, just over a week before...

Obama Admin Health Bureaucrats Bash Pence Rallies, Despite Negative COVID Test

(Headline USA) Health policy specialists questioned White House officials' claim that federal rules on essential workers allow Vice President Mike Pence to continue to campaign...