(Mark Pellin, Headline USA) While Clinton lawyer and bagman Michael Sussmann has been crowing over his recent and baffling acquittal on charges of lying to the FBI, his case has sparked further troubling questions and concerns about the nation’s top law enforcement agency possibly colluding and conspiring with the Democrat Party and the Hillary Clinton presidential campaign.
While it only took a few hours for a jury infested with actual campaign donors to Clinton to give her stooge a free pass, “the trial confirmed what many have long alleged about how top officials eagerly accepted any Russia collusion claim involving Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign,” wrote attorney and George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley.
“Special counsel John Durham’s investigation, which led to Sussmann’s trial, is an indictment of a department and a bureau which, once again, appeared willfully blind as they were played by Hillary Clinton’s campaign,” Turley wrote of the FBI.
The evidence and testimony presented during the Sussmann trial “makes certain echelons within FBI look like the equivalent of unindicted co-conspirators,” wrote Turley.
“For some, it seemed like not just friends but ‘friends with benefits.’”
He’s not alone with that sentiment, which is likely to grow after a new report obtained by Reps. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, and Matt Gaetz, R-Fla., revealed disturbing links between the FBI, the Clinton Cabal and the entire Democrat Party.
The FBI officially admitted and confirmed that it has maintained a “secured work environment within Perkins Coie offices for more than a decade,” and the cozy pairing is ongoing.
Perkins Coie is the lawfare arm of the Democrat Party, and employed Sussmann during the execution of operation Russia hoax to destroy then-presidential candidate Donald Trump. The rad-left firm also houses notorious elections fixer Marc Elias.
“The Democrat Party’s law firm, the law firm that received $42 million from the Democratic Party, has this co-located work space that they operate in concert with the FBI,” Gaetz told Fox News host Tucker Carlson.
“Why in the world would that be the case. Why would Christopher Wray allow it to continue?” Gaetz said.
Maybe someone should ask Sussmann, who for the last year was the point person in charge of the secure operations base that the Democrat Party’s top lawyers shared with the FBI.
“We heard through this trial that the FBI believed Michael Sussmann was lying to them in 2017, when he was shuttling false information about Trump into the intelligence process,” Gaetz said.
“And now we learn that for four years after that lie, Michael Sussmann was in fact operating this secure work environment,” he said, referencing the operations office that Democrat law firm Perkins Coie shared with the FBI.
That raises myriad concerning questions that need answers, said Gaetz, who wondered “what leverage would the Perkins law firm have over the FBI, given this work they’re doing together.”
“Why in the world would an elections lawyer be operating this facility in this way?” Gaetz asked.
“Our concern is that politically motivated dirt was being converted into politically motivated investigations.”
That is a dangerous combination rife with potential disaster for the country, argued The Federalist’s Mollie Hemingway.
Allowing a continuation of two standards of justice, one where friends of the regime can do anything and get off scot-free and one where opponents of the regime will have their lives destroyed for things that friends of the regime can do, is an existential threat to the country.
— Mollie (@MZHemingway) May 31, 2022
“The Democratic Party shouldn’t have special access, a special portal to the FBI, especially knowing what we do now, that they were often trying to take this opposition research and then use that for law enforcement and counter-intelligence purposes,” Gaetz said.
Jordan was equally concerned with the implications of the new information linking the Democrat Party to the FBI, considering that “Secretary Clinton told Sussman to take information — false information — to the press that was also then taken to the FBI.”
“I mean, step back and think about this,” Jordan told Breitbart.
“I mean, I think that is huge — so much so that the former attorney general called it seditious.”
