Young Congresswoman’s Rowdy Past Comes to Light: Fetish Ball, Drugs

(Luis CornelioHeadline USA) Rep. Marie Gluesenkamp Perez, D-Wash., may be one of the youngest members of Congress, but a new report has put her college years back in the spotlight.

According to the California Post, the 38-year-old Democrat organized a “Latex Fetish Ball,” participated in what the outlet described as “drugged-up nude frolics,” and led an “LSD giveaway” while attending college.

The report cites a series of old social media posts from Perez’s time as a student senator at Reed College in Portland, Oregon.

Those former roommates also alleged that Perez once cut off a chicken’s head during a failed experiment.

According to the report, Perez promoted the Fetish Ball in a Feb. 23, 2012, post on the Reed College Senate’s X account.

“Purim party, fetish ball gets its face dj, fishing licenses, whiffle ball, dark room, bonfire, $4000+ approved!” the post read.

The event was reportedly hosted by the college’s Fetish Club, which the California Post said also offered BDSM-related workshops.

The outlet also reported that Perez helped secure funding for the Fetish Ball, as well as a separate festival in which students jogged nude across campus.

According to the California Post, these types of events were not uncommon in the university, infamous for its permissive culture on drugs.

The outlet also reported that the Perez-tied student government organized an “LSD giveaway” on Nov. 2, 2012, as part of “Nitrogen Day,” an event that allegedly included students inhaling nitrous oxide on the campus quad.

The report noted that Perez struggled to pay rent while in college and at one point allegedly offered spoiled vegetables as payment.

The allegations stand in contrast to the bipartisan, measured image Perez has cultivated in Congress. She was elected to the House in 2022 and took office in 2023 after defeating Joe Kent in Washington’s 3rd Congressional District.

The seat was previously held by Jaime Herrera Beutler, who lost her 2022 Republican primary after voting to impeach President Donald Trump following the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol.

Trump Claims the US and Iran Will Hold Talks in Qatar After Exchange of Strikes

(Dave DeCamp, Antiwar.com) President Donald Trump on Monday said that the United States and Iran will hold negotiations in Doha, Qatar, on Tuesday despite the two sides trading strikes over the weekend, though Iranian officials have denied the claim.

“IRAN HAS REQUESTED A MEETING. IT WILL TAKE PLACE TOMORROW IN DOHA! President DJT,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. The White House said that President Trump’s son-in-law, Jared Kushner, and his Middle East envoy, Steve Witkoff, will be traveling to Qatar for the meeting.

Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baghaei confirmed that Iranian officials would travel to Qatar but said they wouldn’t hold talks with US officials. “In the coming days, we will have no negotiation meetings at any level with the American side, and the trip by US representatives to Qatar is unrelated to the trip of the Iranian delegation,” he said.

Baghaei said there would be no negotiations on reaching a final deal until Iran is satisfied that the US is living up to its commitments under the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU). “Iran’s current priority is to ensure the implementation of the provisions of the MoU, and we are seriously pursuing our demands in this regard,” he said.

Hours earlier, Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi said that “technical meetings of the working groups have not been scheduled for this week,” though he added that consultations with Qatar have continued.

“The first round of technical talks within the framework of the designated working groups will be held once conditions are met and after agreement is reached on the date and venue,” Gharibabadi said, according to Iran’s PressTV.

Axios reported on Sunday that the US and Iran have agreed to stop striking each other and would hold talks in Qatar to discuss the dispute over the Strait of Hormuz rather than hold technical discussions on Iran’s nuclear program in Switzerland. An Iranian official also said that the nuclear talks were suspended due to the US attacks on Iran.

Iran has maintained that the language of the MoU means it is solely responsible for transit through the Strait of Hormuz and that any other arrangements violate the agreement. The exchange of strikes began after a drone hit a tanker that was attempting to cross the strait under a UN-backed route that wasn’t coordinated with Iran.

The US then bombed Iran on Friday, and Iranian forces hit back at US bases in Bahrain, and another tanker was struck by a drone. The US then struck targets in Iran for the second time, and Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps targeted US bases in Kuwait and Bahrain on Sunday morning. Since then, there have been no known US or Iranian attacks.

This article originally appeared at Antiwar.com.  

NPR Retracts Article Incorrectly Reporting Justice Alito’s Retirement, Citing ‘Misunderstanding’

(Headline USA) On the final day of the Supreme Court’s session, National Public Radio quickly retracted an article Tuesday that incorrectly reported that Justice Samuel Alito was retiring, blaming the error on “a misunderstanding.”

The article was written by NPR’s veteran Supreme Court reporter, Nina Totenberg, who planned to address the issue on air later in the day, the news organization said.

An editor’s note posted by some NPR affiliates said: “Earlier today, we erroneously published a story saying that Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito was retiring. Neither Alito nor the court’s public information office has announced his retirement, and we have retracted the story.”

Later, a statement from Editor-in-Chief Tommy Evans said NPR regretted the error and the confusion it may have caused.

“Due to a misunderstanding, NPR’s Supreme Court and Legal Affairs Correspondent Nina Totenberg incorrectly reported that Justice Samuel Alito had retired. Neither Justice Alito nor the Supreme Court Public Information Office has announced his retirement,” Evans said.

“As soon as the error was realized, the story was retracted and removed from NPR’s website and an on-air correction was broadcast. We regret the error and any confusion this may have caused,” Evans said.

He added that Totenberg would address the issue on Tuesday’s edition of “All Things Considered,” and that she had reached out to Alito to apologize.

NPR had pulled the story after the Supreme Court’s public information office denied the report earlier Tuesday.

On a busy day for the court. Chief Justice John Roberts had announced the retirement of several court employees, as he customarily does after the court’s final opinions are out. But Alito’s name was not among them.

Speculation had swirled about the justice’s future plans earlier this year, but Fox News and CBS reported this spring that he planned to remain on the bench.

Alito has been on the court since 2006, when he replaced Justice Sandra Day O’Connor. He was nominated by President George W. Bush, a Republican.

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

Self-Exiled Chinese Billionaire Guo Wengui Gets 30 Years in US Prison for Fraud Conviction

(Headline USA) A self-exiled billionaire Chinese business tycoon once believed to be among China’s wealthiest men was sentenced Monday to 30 years in a U.S. prison for a massive financial fraud that a federal judge said cost over 1,000 people worldwide hundreds of millions of dollars.

Guo Wengui, who fled China a decade ago and reinvented himself as a U.S.-based Communist Party critic, was sentenced in a Manhattan courtroom packed with his supporters by Judge Analisa Torres. She said he “preyed on those seeking to bring Democracy to China,” taking their money so he could live lavishly.

Before he was sentenced, Guo protested his treatment in jail, saying he was taken to the hospital early Monday. He disputed a prosecutor’s portrayal of him as a malingerer faking illness, saying he repeatedly vomited as he was returned to jail before being brought to court.

“When I came here, I said: ‘I have a tummy ache, I need to go to the bathroom, I don’t feel well,’” Guo said through an interpreter of his courthouse arrival. Later, Guo wiped his mouth repeatedly with a tissue.

He only briefly addressed the criminal case, defending his intentions by saying in reference to the Chinese Communist Party: “The reason I came to the U.S. was to destroy the CCP.”

The judge, in sentencing him, read snippets of letters she received from victims who described losing their life savings and feeling severely anxious and shamed and having family members turn on them for their poor investment choice.

Torres said Guo “takes no responsibility for his actions and instead insists incredibly his conduct caused no loss and harmed no one.” She said he “has called upon supporters to harass and intimidate those who dare to speak out against him.”

The judge ordered Guo to forfeit $889 million in restitution.

Wei Chen, a victim who testified at trial, told Torres that Guo’s fraud “destroyed my life” and that of her family.

As Guo left the courtroom after the sentencing, supporters applauded and shouted toward him.

Before his arrest and detention without bail three years ago, Guo grew so close to conservative political strategist Steve Bannon that they announced a joint initiative to overthrow the Chinese government in 2020. He lived in a luxury apartment overlooking Central Park and had joined President Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago Florida golf club.

Prosecutors had requested he serve at least 30 years in prison, saying his “astonishing” fraud from 2018 to 2023 “destroyed hundreds of lives” and left “a wreckage of victims and families who have been devastated financially, emotionally, and psychologically.”

Prosecutors said in court papers that his ill-gotten riches fueled “a lifestyle of extraordinary excess and indulgence, a gilded life of mansions, yachts, race cars, designer clothes and luxury furnishings.”

Guo was convicted of nine of 12 criminal charges during a seven-week trial that prosecutors said showcased his deception of thousands of investors in bogus deals that enabled Guo’s lavish lifestyle.

In a court filing, Guo’s lawyers wrote that he was the victim of the Chinese Communist Party’s “grand, pervasive, and life threatening” pursuit of him. They alleged that the party recruited elites in U.S. business, entertainment and politics to conspire against him.

They said in presentence court papers that a lengthy prison term would only validate China’s smear campaign and “embolden further efforts to eliminate Chinese dissidents from public life” while defendants in similar cases received prison terms of two-to-four years.

The lawyers noted that a court probation officer wrote to the sentencing judge that Guo, also known as Miles Guo and Ho Wan Kwok, had scars and disfigurements from physical torture he endured in China and subsequent surgeries he underwent from 1993 to 2022 to repair the injuries.

Defense lawyers said Guo’s wealth grew as his family became the largest shareholder of China’s largest publicly traded securities company, but he became a target of Chinese government officials as he exposed them as corrupt. Eventually, the lawyers wrote, Guo moved to Hong Kong, London and then New York in 2017.

Chinese authorities accused him of rape, kidnapping, bribery and other crimes, but Guo said those allegations were false.

On Monday, China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs said they had noted the sentencing, and that Guo is wanted by the Chinese government and has an Interpol “Red Notice” on him. The notice is a request to police forces around the world to arrest a suspect, pending extradition.

Prosecutors say Guo convinced hundreds of thousands of people to invest more than $1 billion total in entities he controlled, including his media company, GTV Media Group Inc., and his so-called Himalaya Farm Alliance and the Himalaya Exchange.

Guo, the government alleged in pre-sentence court papers, was “entirely unrepentant” for his crimes after he took advantage of lax U.S. asylum laws to flourish in America.

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

Russian Intelligence Report Ties Ukraine to Mexican Cartel Networks

(José Niño, Headline USA) Russian intelligence services charged Ukraine with forging deeper ties to Mexican drug cartels seeking profits from narcotics smuggling into the European Union, RT reported. The accusations arrived as President Donald Trump elevated combating fentanyl exports to the United States among his administration’s chief concerns, labeling the synthetic opioid a “weapon of mass destruction.”

The SVR released a statement Monday alleging that Ukrainian security services intentionally tolerate the growing volume of drugs moving from Latin America toward Europe. Russian intelligence maintained that Kiev enables the trafficking due to mounting financial strain.

“The corruption-ridden regime of Vladimir Zelensky seeks to get additional profit, especially in the situation of the inability of Western sponsors to satisfy all of its insatiable demands,” the agency declared. The SVR further claimed that Kiev prizes cartel support in finding mercenary fighters for its armed forces.

Russian intelligence pinpointed Odessa’s ports as the chief gateway for narcotics traveling to the EU via Poland, Moldova, and Romania. The SVR contended that Ukraine’s inadequate and deeply flawed border and customs controls render the nation an appealing transit corridor. The agency also asserted that Latin American cartels have turned their attention toward Ukraine’s black market arms trade.

These assertions complement existing analyses of Ukraine’s function in European drug distribution. A 2024 study by the EU’s drug agency and Europol determined that Ukraine has long served as a storage and transit hub for drugs destined for the EU, including heroin customarily shipped along the Northern and Caucasus routes originating in Central Asia. The continuing war has subsequently interrupted several of these traditional channels.

Fentanyl manufactured in Mexico has commanded Washington’s focus for months. In December Trump classified the drug, which claims tens of thousands of American lives yearly, as a weapon of mass destruction. Fentanyl presents exceptional hazards relative to heroin and comparable opioids since a fatal dose can amount to just 2 milligrams, roughly equivalent to 10 to 15 grains of table salt.

The purported connection between Ukrainian military personnel and Mexican criminal syndicates reportedly reaches beyond narcotics smuggling. In September 2025 the Mexican newspaper Milenio disclosed that the Jalisco New Generation Cartel sent members to Ukraine to master combat drone methods. Video examined by the publication depicted cartel fighters deploying modified civilian drones with military style precision.

The SVR’s allegations warrant scrutiny given the active hostilities between Russia and Ukraine. Moscow has persistently attempted to characterize Kiev’s leadership as corrupt and lawless. Neither Western governments nor Ukrainian officials have verified the Russian intelligence assertions concerning cartel collaboration.

José Niño is the deputy editor of Headline USA. Follow him at x.com/JoseAlNino

U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Bans on Transgender Athletes in Female Sports

(Andrew Rice, The Center Square) The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld state bans on biological men competing in women’s and girls’ sports.

The court upheld bans in Idaho and West Virginia that prohibited individuals who identified as transgender women and girls from competing in college and youth sports. Justices said the bans did not violate Title IX, a federal law that prohibits  discrimination based on sex.

“Title IX allows schools to provide separate women’s and men’s sports teams defined by biological sex, and West Virginia has permissibly maintained female sports for biological females consistent with Title IX,” Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote in the court’s majority opinion. 

Lawyers for Linday Hecox, a transgender athlete in Idaho, said there is no competitive advantage for biological men to compete in women’s sports. The majority of justices on the high court disagreed.

“Safety and competitive fairness issues can arise when females are forced to compete against males,” Kavanaugh wrote. “In recent years, 27 states and various sports-governing bodies have all drawn the same line.”

Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Ketanji Brown Jackson and Elena Kagan agreed that Title IX protections do not fully apply to transgender athletes. Sotomayor said trangender athletes do not suffer the same discriminatory harm that Title IX was designed to protect against.

“In the context of athletics, the Javits Amendment and resulting regulations instruct that this brand of sex discrimination is permissible: The sexes may generally be separated,” Sotomayor wrote. 

The majority also argued the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution prevents biological men from competing in girls’ and women’s sports. 

“The states argue – and the Court agrees – that the interests of safety and competitive fairness are important interests for purposes of equal protection analysis,” Kavanaugh wrote. “And the states’ sex-based classification – limiting women’s and girls’ sports to biological females – is substantially related to those interests.”

Sotomayor, Kagan and Jackson disagreed with the majority’s interpretation of the Equal Protection Clause. 

“The Equal Protection Clause demands much more when a state deploys a sex classification to achieve legislative aims,” Sotomayor wrote. “Yet in an opinion unencumbered by fact or law, the majority today cuts off that process prematurely, deciding instead that B. P. J.’s case must end now.”

Judicial Crisis Network President Carrie Severino hailed the court’s ruling on X.

Victory for women’s sports today at the Supreme Court,” Severino wrote. “Title IX was intended to protect women in sports, not abolish the category of women altogether. Today the Court came to the commonsense conclusion that limiting women’s sports to women isn’t constitutionally suspect. This is great news for the 27 states who protect female athletes from being forced to compete against biological men.”

In April 2021, West Virginia passed the Save Women’s Sports Act, which bars transgender individuals from participating in girls and women’s sports in public secondary schools and colleges.

Becky Pepper Jackson., a 16-year-old student who has identified as transgender since the third grade, said the law violated sex discrimination rules laid out in Title IX and questioned whether the 14th Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause preventing states from offering separate sports teams based on biological sex.

In 2020, Idaho enacted the Fairness in Women’s Sports Act, which imposes a ban on participation of transgender women and girls on public school sports teams from elementary school through college.

Hecox filed a lawsuit after attempting to join the Boise State University women’s track and cross country team.

In West Virginia, Pepper Jackson was allowed to continue on the team pending further litigation, contrary to Hecox. With clearance from the nation’s high court, Idaho, West Virginia and other states across the country will be able to move forward with the bans on transgender women and girls.

The American Principles Project celebrated the high court’s decision. Terry Schilling, president of the American Principles Project applauded justices in a statement to The Center Square. 

“The Supreme Court has handed down a landmark victory for fairness and sanity by restoring sex-based categories that protect female athletes. Girls deserve their own playing fields and private spaces, free from biological men who seek to invade them,” Shilling said. 

Maine State Rep. Laurel Libby, executive director of Lead Maine, said: 

The US Supreme Court has made it clear that states have every right to preserve separate female athletic competitions, and they should. Today’s decision is a victory for common sense, for fairness, and for every girl who has worked hard to earn her place on the field, the court, or the podium. This decision affirms the constitutional backing of an obvious truth: Neither Title IX nor the Equal Protection Clause requires any state to allow biological males to compete in female categories.

Congressman Says He Went Missing for 4 Months Because He’s Depressed

(Headline USA) New Jersey Republican Rep. Tom Kean Jr. disclosed Tuesday that he was being treated for depression during his unexplained four-month absence from the House, suggesting in a brief floor speech that he remained silent about his condition until now because he is a “private person by nature.”

Depression, Kean said, “is physical, it is emotional, and until you experience it yourself, it is difficult to fully understand how powerful this illness can be.”

Kean’s reappearance came weeks after his victory in an uncontested primary on June 2 and months after he last cast his vote in the House. His speech ended the silence on his condition, yet left questions unanswered. Kean said he first entered the hospital due to health concerns and underwent testing, but offered no further details.

After the speech, Kean left the Capitol quickly without answering questions from reporters.

Kean last voted in the House on March 5. His absence had complicated matters for House Republican leaders, who have been struggling to pass bills with their threadbare majority.

Kean said he was diagnosed for depression and that doctors recommended he remain in the hospital. Addressing his earlier statement that he expected to return to work in a matter of weeks, Kean said he believed that at the time and it was his doctors’ best estimate then.

“But as the over 48 million of my fellow Americans being treated for this illness have come to discover there is no timeline for healing,” Kean said.

“Today I stand before you healthier, stronger and excited to return to the work that I love.”

A second-term lawmaker and scion of a New Jersey political family, Kean represents a battleground district that includes President Donald Trump’s Bedminster golf club.

Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., said he would leave it to Kean to decide whether his remarks Tuesday provided sufficient transparency.

“He spoke to it,” Johnson said. “It’s his personal issue, and, you know, I thought the speech on the floor was, well, I thought he explained it.”

Johnson said he had “encouraged him all along to be as transparent as possible” and was “glad he finally has” been.

The mystery over Kean’s absence had potential political implications, given the competitive district he represents and the Republican Party’s narrow control of the House. His office has said he is still running for reelection and is set to face Democratic nominee Rebecca Bennett, a former Navy helicopter pilot, in New Jersey’s most high-profile contest in November.

Democrats have targeted the district as a prime pickup opportunity, given that the seat has changed hands in the last two midterm elections. Kean won in 2022 by defeating Democrat Tom Malinowski, who had defeated Republican Leonard Lance in 2018.

Johnson added Tuesday he is confident Kean would be “easily” reelected in November. Trump has endorsed Kean’s reelection, without mentioning his absence.

Kean comes from a long line of public servants, stretching 250 years to the country’s founding when one of his ancestors became New Jersey’s first leader since independence.

Kean’s great-grandfather was a senator, his grandfather was a congressman and his father is the former two-term governor, Tom Kean Sr.

Lawmakers vary in how transparent they are about extended absences.

Republican Sen. Mitch McConnell, the longest-serving Senate leader in history, was hospitalized more than two weeks ago, and his office has released few details about his condition since.

Pennsylvania Sen. John Fetterman, a Democrat, checked himself into Walter Reed National Military Medical Center for treatment for clinical depression weeks after being sworn into office in 2023. Fetterman, who has dealt with the effects of a stroke he suffered in May 2022, disclosed the hospitalization the day after he was admitted.

Fetterman has talked openly about his struggle with depression and urged people to get help.

“There are people who are suffering with depression in red counties and blue counties,” Fetterman said in 2023 after a six-week inpatient treatment. “If you need help, please get help,.”

Kean and House Republican leaders kept the public in the dark about his condition for months. He missed more than 100 House votes this year and was not seen publicly in Washington or his district.

New York Rep. Ritchie Torres, a Democrat who has spoken openly about living with depression, wrote on social media after Kean’s remarks that he has “deep sympathy for anyone struggling with mental illness.”

“At the same time, public office carries a duty of transparency,” Torres wrote. “When a public official is absent for an extended period, the public has a right to an honest explanation.

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

Grand Jury Probing Marxist Billionaire for Funding Leftist Network

(José Niño, Headline USA) Federal prosecutors convened a grand jury to investigate potential financial crimes committed by Neville Roy Singham, the technology billionaire operating from Shanghai whose wealth has financed an extensive web of socialist, communist, and Marxist groups throughout the United States for more than 10 years, Fox News reported.

The Manhattan grand jury began issuing subpoenas through a probe overseen by U.S. Attorney Jay Clayton for the Southern District of New York. Acting U.S. Attorney General Todd Blanche greenlit the investigation as the Trump administration targets fraud, money laundering, and other financial misconduct within the multibillion dollar nonprofit sector.

Fox News revealed how Singham channeled $285 million from his Shanghai headquarters into a Goldman Sachs philanthropy fund alongside two shell corporations that subsequently distributed the funds into an array of nonprofit organizations, media outlets, and activist networks promoting sectarian conflict, identity politics, and backing for socialist candidates.

Prosecutors are scrutinizing money flows within Singham’s financial apparatus and working to establish whether Singham, the entities he financed, or their leadership violated laws against wire fraud, bank fraud, money laundering, or related financial offenses. The grand jury received evidence from prosecutors and issued subpoenas demanding bank records and financial documentation.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent made a trip to New York City earlier this year to sit down with Goldman Sachs Chairman and CEO David Solomon. According to sources, Bessent issued a stark warning that Goldman Sachs risked facing conspiracy allegations related to moving Singham’s funds and pressed Solomon to work with federal investigators.

A Goldman Sachs spokesperson stated to Fox News that “all distributions from Mr. Singham’s donor-advised fund were made to legal nonprofits, as determined by the IRS. There have been no distributions from the account since August 2023, and it was closed in early 2024.”

Fox News released a five-part investigative series uncovering a speech where Singham appeared on stage at the Golden Tulip Hotel on November 13, 2025, for a gathering of the “Global South Academic Forum.” Singham publicly endorsed a “new world order” championed by Chinese President Xi Jinping. He labeled the United States a “fascist” nation during his remarks, repeating Chinese Communist Party propaganda.

The series uncovered a 172-page report where Singham detailed his vision for transformation, citing Mao Zedong’s strategy for waging a “people’s war” to advance communism globally.

Fox News traced 223 transactions spanning 2017 through 2025 that transferred $591 million across five continents via 67 central organizations in the Singham network. These entities collaborate with hundreds of additional groups worldwide, creating a network of approximately 2,000 organizations broadcasting anti-American and pro-China messaging.

From that total, Fox News confirmed that $278 million traveled directly from Singham into groups that “sow discord” in America, according to House Ways and Means Chair Jason Smith’s description at a hearing examining “foreign malign influence.”

Investigators are also examining Singham’s wife Jodie Evans, who co-founded Code Pink. Neither Singham nor Evans have replied to multiple requests seeking comment.

José Niño is the deputy editor of Headline USA. Follow him at x.com/JoseAlNino 

Taxpayer Cash Funds Foreign Tech Hires at Indiana University

(José Niño, Headline USA) Indiana University finds itself embroiled in a fierce political firestorm after a state lawmaker exposed the taxpayer funded institution for allegedly passing over qualified American computer science graduates to hire foreign labor. State Representative Andrew Ireland sparked the outrage by publicizing an official document revealing the university’s intent to fill an entry level technology role with an H-1B visa holder.

The controversy erupted last week when Ireland posted a screenshot of a Notice of Intent to Hire on social media. The document confirmed the university had selected a foreign national for an associate software engineer position paying $70,533 annually. In his post, the Republican legislator expressed disbelief that a state school producing thousands of capable tech graduates would look overseas for such a junior role.

“Wow. Taxpayer-funded Indiana University just disclosed it is filling ANOTHER entry-level software engineer job with a foreigner on a H-1B visa,” Ireland wrote on X/Twitter. “Apparently ZERO Americans were qualified even though the same school has thousands of computer science graduates. The H-1B scam needs to end.”

This incident highlights a massive loophole in the federal immigration system. While private corporations must compete in a fierce lottery for a capped number of 85,000 H-1B visas annually, institutions of higher education enjoy a complete exemption, per a report by RT. This allows public universities to sponsor an unlimited number of foreign workers without facing the same restrictions as private businesses.

Critics argue this exemption allows universities to suppress wages by importing cheaper, compliant labor. According to RT’s analysis of the broader visa war, populist figures view the program as a scheme “concocted by the lords of easy money” that displays a “contempt for America and American citizens.” 

The backlash has reached the highest levels of government. As Headline USA previously reported, President Donald Trump recently attempted to curb these practices by proposing a $100,000 fee on new skilled worker visas to protect domestic jobs. 

However, as RT reported, a federal judge struck down the surcharge, siding with states and universities that claimed the fee would harm public institutions reliant on foreign talent.

José Niño is the deputy editor of Headline USA. Follow him at x.com/JoseAlNino 

Supreme Court Upholds Birthright Citizenship

(Andrew Rice, The Center Square) The U.S. Supreme Court, in a 5-4 decision, struck down President Donald Trump’s executive order to overhaul birthright citizenship as unconstitutional.

Justices on the high court ruled in Trump v. Barbara, a case challenging the president’s February 2025 order stripping birthright citizenship protections from children born after Feb. 19, 2025, whose parents are either illegally present in or temporary residents of the United States.

The 14th Amendment took central focus throughout the court’s opinion. The amendment, originally set to confer citizenship rights to formerly enslaved people, was widely regarded as allowing for citizenship of any individual born in the United States.

The 14th Amendment reads: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.”

The majority of justices said the 14th Amendment is adequate to confer citizenship to children born to noncitizen parents. Chief Justice John Roberts said the clause “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” refers to the United States’ power to govern anyone living in its territory. 

“Children born in the United States to parents unlawfully or temporarily present here are thus subject to the Nation’s jurisdiction,” Roberts wrote in the court’s majority opinion. 

Roberts cited Supreme Court precedent in Wong Kim Ark, a 1898 case that upheld citizenship for children born in the U.S. to Chinese nationals. 

“Aliens who traveled to the United States for ‘business or pleasure’ received no ‘exemption from the jurisdiction of the country,'” Roberts wrote. “To the contrary, they were subject to that jurisdiction for as long as they remained here—and any children born to them were American citizens under the Fourteenth Amendment.”

Roberts also said the 14th Amendment was used to enshrine common law understandings of citizenship in the U.S. Constitution. This understanding of would make it difficult for Congress to enact a law limiting birthright citizenship. 

Several justices on the high court did not agree with the majority’s interpretation of the statute. Justice Samuel Alito said the 14th Amendment was misinterpreted by the majority opinion.

He said the 14th Amendment was meant to mirror the 1866 Civil Rights Act, which strictly conferred citizenship to formerly enslaved African Americans and excluded American Indians and children of diplomats. Alito said those exclusions are proof as to why birthright citizenship cannot be conferred to children of illegal immigrants.

“A person who is ‘subject to any foreign power’ is not ‘subject to the jurisdiction’ of the United States within the meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment,” Alito wrote. 

Justice Brett Kavanaugh agreed with the majority’s judgment in the case but partially dissented to the ruling. He said the court should have dealt with the issue of citizenship on a narrower basis, instead of involving protections brought about by the U.S. Constitution. 

Mike O’Neill, vice president of Legal Affairs and Landmark Legal, expressed frustration at the court’s decision to uphold birthright citizenship. He said the decision allows for “birth tourism” to continue in the U.S. 

“Freezing out the Congress by providing a blanket interpretation of the 14th Amendment’s Citizenship Clause limits the power of the American people to effectuate policies that ensure our national security,” O’Neill said. “Make no mistake: America is more vulnerable today after this decision.”

The high court’s decision represents a critical blow to the Trump administration’s immigration agenda.