Comey Confidant Subpoenaed in Probe Looking into Trump Sabotage Efforts

(Luis CornelioHeadline USA) A federal grand jury investigating former FBI Director James Comey has subpoenaed his longtime confidant Daniel Richman, the same individual who acknowledged that Comey asked him to leak information to the media, several news outlets reported.

The subpoena, reported by Fox News on Monday, is part of a broader investigation into Comey’s alleged role in what officials have described as a scheme to undermine the first Trump administration.

Comey was previously investigated during Trump’s first term in connection with the leaking of sensitive information, including details about his conversations with President Donald Trump, shortly after the president fired him on May 9, 2017.

Richman is a professor at Columbia Law School, a former federal prosecutor and a longtime Comey confidant. He gained national prominence after Comey told the Senate Intelligence Committee that he had used a friend to leak his notes to the media in an effort to prompt the appointment of a special counsel to investigate Trump.

Richman later told the Associated Press that he was the individual who leaked the notes to the media.

In 2025, Richman sued the DOJ, claiming prosecutors violated his Fourth Amendment rights against unreasonable searches and seizures. Richman specifically alleged that the DOJ unlawfully used data it had collected during the first Trump administration as part of its investigation into Comey.

That investigation ultimately closed without charges after President Joe Biden took office in 2021 and new leadership took over at the DOJ.

The subpoena for Richman was issued by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida, according to The New York Times.

Comey himself has since faced two federal indictments.

He was first indicted in September 2025 on charges of making false statements to Congress and obstructing a congressional proceeding in connection with the leaks. Those charges were later dismissed on a legal technicality.

A federal grand jury again indicted Comey in April 2026, this time on charges of “knowingly and willfully” making a threat to take the life of, and to inflict bodily harm on Trump.

The charges stemmed from a social media post Comey made on May 15, 2025, featuring a photo depicting “86 47,” which the DOJ said represented “a serious expression of an intent to do harm to the President of the United States.”

Comey’s trial is scheduled for Oct. 21, 2026, although the judge is reviewing a request from his defense attorneys to dismiss the charges over claims of vindictive prosecution.

Feds Close Trucking Schools in Alleged Fraud Crackdown

(The Center Square) Trump administration officials say they have ordered the emergency removal of 110 commercial driver’s license schools associated with more than 5,000 drivers who failed English language proficiency tests.

They have also shutdown of 150 additional schools that claim to be certified but have unlicensed instructors and don’t have adequate space to allow drivers to get behind the wheel and drive.

U.S. Secretary of Transportation Sean Duffy and U.S. Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin spoke in Detroit on Monday, joined by other federal officials and U.S. attorneys from several Midwest districts.

The press conference followed the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration’s review of roadside inspection records for commercial drivers cited for not meeting English Language Proficiency requirements.

The agency said it compared those drivers with records in the Training Provider Registry to identify training providers that repeatedly certified drivers who did not meet federal qualification standards.

“A lot of the licenses unlawfully issued come from California, New York, a lot from Illinois,” Duffy said.

Duffy said many of the violations happen in the Midwest.

The Illinois Secretary of State’s office did not immediately respond to The Center Square’s request for comment.

DHS officials said a synchronized single-day sweep targeted more than 200 training schools across 23 states.

Mullin said those who support sanctuary jurisdictions are supporting illegal activity that bleeds into other states.

“Regardless if you’re in a sanctuary city or sanctuary state, that doesn’t keep you from having to answer to the law,” Mullin said.

In addition, the Department of Justice announced the new Joint Task Force Crossroads of America “to safeguard the nation’s highway system and strengthen the security of our borders.”

The task force includes U.S. attorneys from Illinois, Indiana, Michigan and Ohio.

Jerome Gorgon, U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Michigan, said many foreign nationals and illegal aliens lack the proper training to safely drive 40 tons of truck and cargo across America.

“These drivers squeeze American truckers out of the marketplace with low wage rates,” Gorgon said.

Gorgon said many illegal drivers haul drugs and guns on behalf of international crime syndicates.

According to Duffy, fraudulent operators not only drove wages down but also caused insurance costs to rise.

“With all the bad actors, insurance is one of the biggest complaints I hear, because all of the bad drivers on the road creating crashes and accidents are driving rates up,” Duffy said.

Liability insurance premium costs increased 18.6% in the commercial trucking industry from 2021 to 2024, according to the American Transportation Research Institute.

Duffy said removing illegal truck drivers will not cause a shortage.

“I have multiple generations of small trucking driving companies that might have 20, 30 rigs, they’re going out of business, because they can’t compete with the fraudster,” Duffy said.

Greg Bishop contributed to this story

Thieves Steal $70,000 in Pabst Beer from California Warehouse

(Headline USAThieves made off with tens of thousands of cans of Pabst beer in two separate heists from a Southern California warehouse on the same day, police said.

Pabst Blue Ribbon has turned the thefts — valued by police at $70,000 — into a light-hearted social media promotion. But police in Montclair said Friday that investigators are trying to determine whether they were part of a single operation.

In the first heist, about $45,000 worth of beer headed to Tucson, Arizona, was picked up but never delivered, according to police. An hour later, a “purported subcontracting company” submitted fake documents to pick up another $25,000 worth of beer, Montclair police said in a news release. Both thefts occurred on Aug. 17 at an Anheuser-Busch distribution center about 40 miles east of Los Angeles.

Roughly 34,000 cans of Pabst Blue Ribbon and non-alcoholic Old Milwaukee beer — more than 1,500 cases — were stolen, according to a police report obtained by the Los Angeles Times.

In Instagram posts, Pabst put the weight of the stolen cargo at 40,000 pounds (18,145 kilograms) and started a countdown seeking its return.

“To the thief: we don’t fault you for wanting to brag to your friends how much PBR you have, we just wish you obtained it the honorable way,” the company wrote. It added, “P.s. this is real and we are deadly serious.”

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

Online Influencers Revealed as Department of War Operatives

(Ken Silva, Headline USA) The Washington Post revealed Sunday that several major online influencers are on the Pentagon’s payroll, pumping out propaganda supportive of Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and the Trump administration’s war in Iran.

According to the Post, the online influencers paid by the Pentagon include retired Air Force colonel Rob Maness, retired Army colonel Kurt Schlichter, and retired Army colonel Thomas Anderson. Maness has more than 135,000 followers on X, Schlichter has nearly 620,000, and Anderson has more than 323,000 with his pseudonymous account, Cynical Publius.

Additionally, it had already been revealed prior to the Post’s article that Jennica Pounds, who runs the 956,000-plus follower account Data Republican, is also on the Department of War’s payroll.

The Post noted that while collecting paychecks from the government, the above-mentioned influencers have published numerous pro-government posts and articles. Last month, for instance, Maness wrote in the Daily Caller that Hegseth’s team needs to root out “disloyal” career employees

Schlichter, for his part, published a column on Aug. 6 in Townhall, calling Trump a “hero for finally fighting back against Iran.”

Anderson, meanwhile, said in the Federalist in April that there is “a cancer in America’s military ranks, and it must be expunged before it’s too late,” the Post noted.

Maness and Schlichter reportedly did not respond to messages requesting comment, while Anderson declined to comment.

Anderson later posted about the matter on X, saying he would like to “clarify some things” about a pro-Hegseth article he wrote in February in American Greatness.

“My service with the Department of War as a ‘Special Government Employee’ was exclusively limited to participation in such task force and ended on July 26, 2026,” he said. “At no time have I ever received any compensation of any kind from any government source of any kind for anything I write or have ever written on X or in any magazine or other source. Those who claim otherwise defame me.”

Shortly before the publication of this article, Schlichter also responded to the Post’s article with a Townhall column entitled, “The Washington Post Embarrasses Itself Trying to Embarrass Me.”

“The [Post] article’s implication was that we were somehow being paid to tweet DOW talking points, which is false. But it had the predictable effect on the predictable dummies of X, who obediently morphed from screaming that I am a ‘Zionist Jew lover’ and ‘Epstein protector’ to a ‘fed.’ It was all an IQ test, and a lot of people failed,” Schlichter wrote.

Ken Silva is the editor of Headline USA. Follow him at x.com/jd_cashless.

Singapore Removes 5% Cap on Precious Metals Holdings in Certain Funds

(Mike Maharrey, Money Metals News Service) The Monetary Authority of Singapore has removed a 5 percent cap on precious metals holdings for investment funds and family offices regulated under Section 13O and Section 13U tax-exemption schemes.

The move comes after many funds were forced to liquidate part of their gold and silver holdings as the price climbed to $5,500 last January.

Under Sections 13O and 13U, certain investment income and gains are exempt from Singapore income tax if the fund or family office meets certain statutory and regulatory conditions — including the 5 percent cap on precious metals allocation.

According to the Business Times, “The removal of the cap is likely to improve investment flexibility amid geopolitical uncertainty, and boost Singapore’s competitiveness as a regional gold-trading hub.

According to the Times, some funds and family offices plan to raise their gold and silver allocations above 5 percent, with the investment cap removed.

Others, such as Raffles Family Office, plan to keep their allocation at 5 percent, but applauded the move because it allows for higher allocations in the future should the need arise.

What it really does is if the market calls for it, we can go heavier and keep the whole position tax efficient. It does not move our base case, but it will give us more flexibility,” William Chow said.

Julius Baer head of FX and precious metals trading Asia, Christopher Irwin, said the changes are “likely to encourage investors to revisit the role of physical precious metals within a strategic portfolio context.

He added that it could more broadly boost Asian gold demand in the future.

“We have long held the view that if Asian investors begin to meaningfully increase their exposure to gold, it could have a significant impact on regional investment demand over time.”

Irwin went on to explain that loosening the tax rules may not have a measurable impact initially; however, it is a bullish move in the long run.

“We may not see an immediate and dramatic reallocation, but the change removes a structural hurdle, allowing clients greater flexibility to hold physical gold where they see value.”

Irwin put the rule change in the context of a broader push to turn Asia into a global precious metal hub.

London, New York, and Switzerland have served as the center of the gold trade for nearly two centuries. However, with gold progressively flowing from West to East, China and other Asian hubs are developing infrastructure to challenge Western dominance.

Earlier this year, Singapore announced plans to create an over-the-counter gold-clearing system and central bank gold vaulting by the end of 2026, among other measures.

Meanwhile, Hong Kong’s revamped dollar-denominated futures contract reported record physical gold deliveries.

A day after the revitalized futures contract launched, Hong Kong began trial operations of its gold clearing and settlement system. The government-owned clearing system will reportedly “mirror” the financial infrastructure used by the LBMA in London.

Looking at the bigger picture, these developments in Hong Kong and Singapore reveal a slow but steady migration of the gold trade from the West to the East.


Mike Maharrey is a journalist and market analyst for Money Metals with over a decade of experience in precious metals. He holds a BS in accounting from the University of Kentucky and a BA in journalism from the University of South Florida.

Congress Probing Why DEA Purposely Allowed Fentanyl Sales

(Headline USAA controversial policing tactic that permitted staggering amounts of deadly fentanyl to reach the streets as federal authorities sought to build bigger drug cases is now under investigation by Republicans on the House Oversight Committee.

The committee’s chairman, Rep. James Comer, a Republican from Kentucky, sent a letter Monday to Attorney General Todd Blanche requesting records related to the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration’s controversial strategy of monitoring — yet not seizing — major fentanyl shipments.

The request echoes concerns raised by officials in New Mexico, the epicenter of the fentanyl crisis, where DEA whistleblowers recently reported being ordered to stand down rather than seize hundreds of thousands of fentanyl pills in possible violation of Justice Department rules intended to safeguard communities. Last week, the state’s attorney general, Raúl Torrez, sued the Justice Department seeking to force it to turn over some of the same records being sought by Republicans on Comer’s committee.

“While DEA agents may not have the resources to intercept every single known shipment, a policy directing them not to intercept significant shipments is unconscionable and undoubtedly resulted in considerable harm and lives lost,” Comer wrote in the letter, a copy of which was obtained by The Associated Press.

The DEA did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The lawsuit and congressional inquiry come two months after an AP investigation found DEA agents repeatedly monitored major fentanyl shipments in New Mexico between 2023 and 2025 that were allowed to hit the streets as federal authorities built out criminal cases.

The fentanyl went unseized amid the deadliest drug epidemic in U.S. history and even as DEA led a public awareness campaign — “One Pill Can Kill” — emphasizing that even a few milligrams of the substance can be lethal. Last year, the White House designated the synthetic opioid a “weapon of mass destruction.”

Comer requested records covering only the Biden administration, citing what he described as its “relaxation of fentanyl risk mitigation protocols” developed during President Donald Trump’s first term. The protocols, Comer said, should have prevented the fentanyl from hitting the streets in such large numbers.

The earlier policy, adopted in 2017, called on agents to “seize or otherwise prevent the distribution” of fentanyl “as soon as practicable.” The department rewrote those rules in 2024 to afford law enforcement far more discretion in whether to take action to prevent fentanyl trafficking, citing “the benefits to be achieved through preserving the investigation.”

AP reporting found the investigative strategy — known as allowing drugs to “walk” — continued into Trump’s second administration during the run-up to the largest fentanyl bust in DEA history, a takedown announced in May 2025 by then-Attorney General Pam Bondi.

As part of that investigation, authorities seized some 3 million fentanyl pills. But even larger quantities went unseized as agents in Albuquerque stood by and watched as drug couriers entered hotels with backpacks believed to be carrying as many as 100,000 fentanyl pills.

The entire network could have been dismantled six months earlier, according to a former DEA supervisor who worked on the case and is now among three whistleblowers sounding the alarm about the longstanding practice.

The Justice Department’s internal watchdog this month announced a nationwide review of government policies and wiretap investigations to determine whether federal authorities have used the same tactic elsewhere.

“Our investigations are long term and they are complex and they are done under the guidance of the law,” DEA Administrator Terry Cole said in an interview this month with Fox News welcoming the inspector general’s review. “We will continue to do that, but we need to stay 100% focused on the adversary.”

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

Election 2026: Nation’s Longest Voting Window Opens Friday

(The Center Square) One day shy of a full two weeks sooner than any other state in the nation, North Carolina county boards of elections on Friday will begin sending absentee ballots to any voter having made a request.

The nation’s ninth largest state at 11.2 million is at 7,837,065 registrations, down 2,846 from the general election in 2024, up 128,805 since the March 3 primary, and up 4,824 in the most recent seven-day period updated by the State Board of Elections. Wisconsin, on Sept. 17, will be next to put ballots in the mail.

From Friday to Election Day is 61 days and ballots, per past patterns, are likely to begin filtering in next week. The deadline for an absentee ballot in the mail to be in a county election board office is when the polls close at 7:30 p.m. on Nov. 3.

The Center Square analyzes the registrations trend as part of its mission for reporting taxpayers’ views, of government accountability, and the intersection at the ballot box that will shape policy impacting Americans across multiple areas.

Voter roll maintenance, standard and as required by state law, and a trend away from parties since Election Day 2024 has continued to swell the independents and weaken the major parties regarding registrations.

Since the presidential cycle November election two years ago, also North Carolina’s longest ballot, the state’s voter registrations choosing no affiliation to a party has grown 179,065. Democrats have lost 133,642 and Republicans have lost 18,546.

Since this year’s primary 26 weeks ago, the unaffiliated bloc has grown 116,861 – 65.3% of its nearly two years growth – while Republicans have gained 6,283 and Democrats have gained 5,457.

In the past week, the independent group grew 3,844, Democrats were up 578 and Republicans increased 363.

By share through Saturday, the unaffiliated bloc is 40% (3,138,071) of the state’s registrations. Republicans have 29.7% (2,328,526) and Democrats 29.6% (2,319,105).

The state does recognize two other parties. The Libertarian Party total registrations is 46,551 and the Green Party has 4,812.

Oct. 9 is the registration deadline.

North Carolinians will choose a U.S. senator, all 14 members of the U.S. House, and all 170 members of the General Assembly. One state Supreme Court seat and a number of judges, district attorneys, and county level offices are on the state’s second-longest ballot of the four-year cycles.

For context in the change of landscape, at what is generally considered a landmark Election Day in 2008, the state’s total registrations were 6,264,733. Those unaffiliated numbered just under 1.4 million (22.2%) while Democrats’ 2,866,669 had 45.8% share and Republicans’ 2,002,416 was a 32% share. Barack Obama became the first Democrat since Jimmy Carter in 1976 to carry the state, by a mere 14,177 votes of more than 4.3 million cast, on the way to winning the White House.

Neither Obama or Carter managed to carry the state in their reelection bids.

The state’s lone U.S. Senate seat in 2008 was won by Democrat Kay Hagan, and the 13 U.S. House seats were divvied up eight Democrats and five Republicans. Democrats are 0-5 in Senate races since.

The Council of State went 8-2 to Democrats. Incumbent Republicans’ Steve Troxler and Cherie Berry remained commissioners of agriculture and labor, respectively. And the General Assembly was 30-20 Democrats in the Senate and 68-52 Democrats in the House of Representatives.

Today, Republicans have won the state in the presidential race 13 of the last 15 contests (1968-present), five consecutive U.S. Senate races (2010-present), and two years ago captured 10 of 14 seats for the U.S. House.

The Council of State is a 5-5 split. On Election Day 2024, the General Assembly majorities were 30-20 Republicans in the Senate and 71-49 Republicans in the House of Representatives.

Abbott, Talarico Leading, Races No Longer Considered Solid Republican

(The Center Square) Several new polls show that Gov. Greg Abbott and state Sen. James Talarico are leading in their respective races for governor and U.S. Senate.

A new University of Virginia’s Center for Politics rating also downgraded both races, indicating neither are no longer considered solidly Republican. It adjusted Texas’ U.S. Senate race from “leans Republican” to a “toss up” and the governor’s race from “safe Republican” to “likely Republican.”

This is after the Cook Political Report adjusted its ratings for both races, also stating the U.S. Senate race was a “toss-up” and the governor’s race “leans right” instead of solidly Republican, The Center Square reported.

In the U.S. Senate race, Republican Attorney General Ken Paxton is trailing Democrat state Rep. James Talarico, D-Austin, by up to 11 points, according to recent polls. Paxton “emerging from the Republican runoff was hardly a scenario that national GOP strategists were enthusiastic about, and the general election campaign he’s run has done little to dispel the concerns some in his party had long harbored,” the center states.

“Of course, Texas is a steep climb for any Democrat. Many undecided voters may ultimately hold their noses for and vote for Paxton,” the center adds. “But Paxton’s favorability has been underwater in nearly every survey, and he’s underperforming his own party’s base support in several polls.”

It also points to the fact that Paxton hasn’t been able to raise money compared to Talarico’s campaign raising a record $30 million in the last quarter.

“The Texas Senate race features a flawed Republican, a well-funded Democrat, and a national environment that could be as favorable to Democrats as what 2018’s was – or, perhaps more so. Putting these pieces together, we’re moving Texas Senate from Leans Republican to Toss-up,” the center said. “We really thought we’d keep this race at Leans Republican through November, but with the election still a couple of months away, we think there’s enough uncertainty to call it a Toss-up for now.”

A new Texas Public Opinion Research poll has Talarico leading Paxton by six points, 48% to 42% and leading among independents by 21 points.

The Center for Politics, although downgrading the gubernatorial race, said that Abbott running for an unprecedented fourth term “remains the likely winner.” It cites his “huge war chest” and favorability rating but notes that “Abbott might not win as comfortably as he did in his past campaigns,” pointing to multiple recent polls showing the race is in single digits. It’s the closest race of his political career, The Center Square reported. In previous races, Abbott won by more than 20 points.

The Center points to two key issues upsetting voters. One is widespread backlash to data center expansion that has occurred under Abbott due to tax breaks and other incentives he and the legislature created. Just last November, Abbott touted Texas as the “epicenter” of AI development when Google announced a $40 billion AI investment in Texas, The Center Square reported. In the last month, Abbott issued directives to temporarily halt data center development and ensure greater regulatory oversight, which critics argue isn’t enough.

The other is widespread bipartisan opposition to the Trump administration border wall and barrier construction in the Big Bend region of Texas. Abott has been largely silent on the issue, only recently taking credit for the administration claiming it wasn’t building a border wall in the Big Bend National Park or a state park.

“The episode is notable because opposition to the border infrastructure didn’t come exclusively from Democrats or environmental groups,” the center said, pointing to west Texas sheriffs, landowners, and Republican officials who oppose the construction. The administration only recently succumbed to pressure largely from local Republicans, stating it would halt construction in Big Bend National Park, The Center Square reported. Multiple lawsuits are ongoing.

“As with the data center fight, Abbott had to navigate tensions within his own coalition rather than simply rallying Republicans against Democrats,” the center said.

It also points to a third factor, stating, “Abbott might be ‘wearing out his welcome’” by seeking a fourth term. “Incumbency fatigue … could be contributing to a closer-than-usual result. Accordingly, we’re moving Texas Governor from Safe Republican to Likely Republican.”

The TPOR poll shows Abbott leading Hinojosa by seven points, 49% to 42%.

A new Barbara Jordan Public Policy Research and Survey Center at Texas Southern University poll shows that in three south Texas congressional districts where Republicans are trailing Democrats, Hinojosa is leading Abbott by between 3 and 4 points. It also shows Talarico leading Paxton by between 8 and 11 points. It also found that Republicans who responded to the survey said they were voting for Democratic candidates in November.

A University of Texas/Texas Politics Project poll has Abbott leading Hinojosa by five points, 45% to 40%, among likely voters, The Center Square reported. It has Talarico leading Paxton by three points, 42% to 39%. It also shows that President Donald Trump has lost favorability with Texas voters.

At Least 15 People Are Missing in the Grand Canyon

(Headline USAState and federal officials ramped up efforts Monday to locate around 15 people who are missing after a major flash flood swept through in the Grand Canyon, killing at least one person.

Weather forecasters warned rain and thunderstorms could bring more flooding to the popular tourist attraction from where scores of visitors were evacuated following the flood Saturday in Bright Angel Creek. The deluge also destroyed the only water pipeline in the canyon, leading to emergency water restrictions for year-round residents. Tourists have been barred from staying at lodges and hotels inside the park.

Visiting the Grand Canyon — a crown jewel of the national park system — can be particularly dangerous in the summer because of the risk of flash flooding that accompanies the monsoon, or rainy season. Clear days can give way quickly to thunderstorms and downpours.

“With deep monsoonal moisture in place and already saturated soils in some locations, an elevated risk of flash flooding will be in place through Monday,” the National Weather Service said Monday.

The body of a 46-year-old man was recovered Sunday evening near Crystal Rapids along the Colorado River, the National Park Service said without providing details. More than 60 people were airlifted from the depths of the canyon. The park service asked anyone with details about hikers or campers still unaccounted for to provide information. The Arizona Department of Public Safety helped with evacuations Sunday.

“My heart is with the families and loved ones of every person unaccounted for after the flash flooding at the Grand Canyon,” Arizona Gov. Katie Hobbs posted Sunday.

The state Department of Emergency and Military Affairs was coordinating with the park service and county emergency management officials in search and recovery efforts, Hobbs said.

Parth Desai was hiking through a narrow passage in Bright Angel Canyon with fellow physicians and a park ranger when heavy rain started falling Saturday.

“We saw the creek flood, waterfalls coming up out of nowhere, boulders, mud, landslides happening everywhere,” he said.

Later, as they made their way toward Phantom Ranch, a colleague shouted “Up, Up, Up, Up!” as a 4-foot debris wall headed toward them and they ran up into a patch of cacti, he said. They were rescued by helicopter late Saturday after making it to the Phantom Ranch area, he said.

Torrents of water wiped out footbridges over Bright Angel Creek that runs into the Colorado River, widening the bed and extending an existing river rapid or creating a new one. The flood was a major blow to an enduring effort to modernize the pipeline that serves 6 million visitors a year and roughly 1,600 residents of Grand Canyon Village.

“Heaven help us if the whole thing down there at the bottom has to be reconstructed,” said Jack Schmidt, director of the Center for Colorado River Studies at Utah State University. “Where are they going to get the money?”

In August 2024, a woman was swept away in a flash flood while hiking in the Havasupai region of the Grand Canyon. Chenoa Nickerson, 33, was found dead after a three-day search.

Halting overnight stays at the park because of a lack of water is rare, although the pipeline frequently has failed over the years. While the Grand Canyon has large storage tanks for potable water on the South Rim, they won’t be refilled while the pipeline is out of service.

A $208 million rehabilitation of the pipeline and upgrades to the associated water delivery system started in 2023, with the park service calling it a crucial investment to ensure the park can meet the needs of residents and visitors. The project was expected to be completed next year.

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

Fed Chair Warsh Runs Open-Mouth Operations at Jackson Hole But Can He Deliver?

(Mike Maharrey, Money Metals News Service) Federal Reserve Chairman Kevin Warsh moved markets on Friday with his Jackson Hole speech, even though the central bank has yet to do anything to move inflation.

Clearly, Warsh wants to convey a message. He’s tough on inflation, and the Fed will “deliver price stability.”

It’s less clear that he will ever be able to deliver on his hawkish promise.

In fact, the Warsh Fed looks a whole lot like the Powell Fed, relying on rhetoric instead of policy.

Ironically, Warsh insisted, “We should not indulge a regime in which market participants are looking primarily to the Fed for their next trade.

After the speech, gold and silver both tanked, with the yellow metal falling by over 3 percent and silver plunging by more than 4 percent. Stocks also corrected, with the NASDAQ dropping by nearly 139 points.

Why the strong market reaction?

Because the economy is addicted to easy money, and Warsh hinted he’s not inclined to fill up the punch bowl with inflation still running well above the mythical 2 percent target.

In fact, Warsh’s speech reignited speculation that the central bank will likely raise interest rates at least once before the end of the year. Since gold and silver are non-yielding assets, a higher-rate environment is perceived as negative for metals.

So much for market participants not looking to the Fed.

And keep in mind, the central bank hasn’t done a darn thing. The markets reacted to Warsh’s “open-mouth operations,” not a policy change. And there are about 40 trillion reasons Warsh will have an extremely hard time delivering on his hawkish promises.

What Warsh Said

Warsh never mentioned a rate hike during the speech. However, he dropped enough hints to convince everybody that rate hikes are still on the table.

John Hopkins economist and former Jerome Powell advisor, Jon Faust, told the Associated Press, “He found a way to convey that, if necessary, he would support raising rates, which is one thing people were concerned about.

While Warsh conceded inflation has cooled somewhat, he insisted the data “do not tell me that underlying trends have meaningfully improved.”

“We must be confident that underlying inflation is moving to our objective, clearly and at sufficient speed. Otherwise, we have work to do.”

He insisted that the “objective” is price inflation at 2 percent.

“The Fed’s price-stability objective of 2 percent, as measured by the personal consumption expenditures (PCE) price index, is a firm, fixed target.”

He also emphasized that it’s the central bank’s job to keep inflation reined in.

“That’s our job, our mandate, and our charge to keep.”

Warsh pointed out that “price stability is not self-executing, nor is inflation necessarily mean-reverting.

“It is the Fed’s job to deliver stable prices.”

And how does the Fed do that, according to our intrepid Fed chair?

“Short-term interest rates are the predominant tool to achieve the dual mandate.”

Analysts widely took this statement as a sign that Warsh & Co. are on the rate-hiking path, possibly as early as next month.

“The Fed’s price-stability objective of 2 percent, as measured by the personal consumption expenditures (PCE) price index, is a firm, fixed target.”

But it’s important to note that Warsh never said the Fed will hike rates. He didn’t hint at any timeline. He just blustered about being tough on inflation.

But as most bullies learn, talking tough and being tough when the punches fly are two different things.

40-Trillion Reasons the Fed Probably Can’t Deliver

The Fed head has been talking tough on inflation since he took the chair in May. However, two Fed meetings into the Warsh regime, there hasn’t been any policy change. In fact, the federal funds rate has been set at 3.5 percent since December 2025, despite both Powell and Warsh warning about persistently sticky inflation.

This raises a question. If inflation remains stuck well above the target, as it has been for years, shouldn’t the central bank do something besides talk about how big a problem it is? At some point, don’t you stop talking and act?

The answer is yes – unless there is a reason you can’t?

And there is, indeed, a reason – about 40 trillion of them.

I am, of course, referring to the $40 trillion national debt.

The national debt is costing the federal government over $1 trillion per year. The U.S. Treasury Department just announced a bond market intervention in an effort to drive long-term rates lower. (It didn’t work.)

How does the Fed hike rates in this environment?

And the national debt is only one part of the massive debt black holeAmericans are buried under more trillions in consumer debt at extremely high credit card rates. Meanwhile, corporations are leveraged to the hilt.

If the Fed raises rates to tackle inflation, it will almost certainly crash the debt-riddled bubble economy.

This is the Catch-22 I’ve been harping on for months.

The Fed simultaneously needs to raise rates to push inflation back to the target and cut rates to manage the debt black hole and keep the economy limping along.

So, I don’t think the Fed will hike rates. And if it does, I think it will tip the economy into a deep recession and likely a financial crisis.

Either way, you want to have gold and silver.


Mike Maharrey is a journalist and market analyst for Money Metals with over a decade of experience in precious metals. He holds a BS in accounting from the University of Kentucky and a BA in journalism from the University of South Florida.