Judge Sets Wednesday Hearing in Motion to Dismiss Case against New York City Mayor Eric Adams

(Headline USA) New York City Mayor Eric Adams will face the federal judge on Wednesday who will decide whether to grant the Justice Department’s request to dismiss corruption charges against him after lawyers explain the abrupt change in position just weeks before an April trial.

Judge Dale E. Ho in Manhattan scheduled an afternoon hearing in a written order Tuesday as his first response to the government’s Friday request to dismiss the charges after a weeklong clash among government lawyers that led to resignations by several top prosecutors in Washington and New York who refused to seek dismissal.

Ho said the parties in the case must be prepared to address the reasons for the government’s dismissal request, the “scope and effect of Mayor Adams’s ‘consent in writing,'” … and the “procedure for resolution of the motion.”

At the start of his two-page order, Ho quoted from an opinion by the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan that said Rule 48(a) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, which governs the government’s request, was not created to shift absolute power from the Executive to the Judicial Branch but was intended “as a power to check power.”

The appeals court also wrote that the Executive Branch is “presumptively the best judge of whether a pending prosecution should be terminated” and advised that “pending prosecutions should not be judicially disturbed unless clearly contrary to manifest public interest.”

Ho also cited legal history noting that a judge has independent obligations once the government has involved the judiciary by obtaining an indictment or a conviction.

And he quoted from one judicial opinion that said a judge must be “satisfied that the reasons advanced for the proposed dismissal are substantial” before approving a dismissal.

The hearing will occur as a growing number of former prosecutors express concerns about the past week’s events, with some calling on Ho to conduct an inquiry that could put Washington’s Justice Department leadership under a spotlight.

Late Monday, Justice Connection, which supports Justice Department employees, released a letter from over 900 former federal prosecutors to career federal prosecutors that said they have “watched with alarm” as values “foundational to a fair and justice legal system” have been tested in the past week.

In the letter, the former prosecutors said they “salute and admire the courage many of you have already exhibited. You have responded to ethical challenges of a type no public servant should ever be forced to confront with principle and conviction, in the finest traditions of the Department of Justice.”

The letter was released after three former U.S. attorneys from New York, New Jersey and Connecticut submitted papers to Ho suggesting that he appoint a special prosecutor if he finds the Justice Department acted improperly or that he order that all evidence be made available to state and local prosecutors.

Adams has pleaded not guilty to charges that while in his prior role as Brooklyn borough president, he accepted over $100,000 in illegal campaign contributions and lavish travel perks from a Turkish official and business leaders seeking to buy his influence.

The last week has featured an unusual public fight between Emil Bove, the second-in-command of the Justice Department, and two top New York federal prosecutors: interim Manhattan U.S. Attorney Danielle Sassoon and Hagan Scotten, an assistant U.S. attorney in Manhattan who led the Adams prosecution.

Bove wrote that the case had “unduly restricted Mayor Adams’ ability to devote full attention and resources to the illegal immigration and violent crime.”

On Thursday, Sassoon resigned, along with five high-ranking Justice Department officials. A day later, Scotten resigned, noting that Sassoon had properly resisted a demand that the charges be dropped and the possibility they could be reinstated after this year’s election.

“No system of ordered liberty can allow the Government to use the carrot of dismissing charges, or the stick of threatening to bring them again, to induce an elected official to support its policy objectives,” Scotten wrote.

On Monday, Adams — amid calls to resign by some Democrats — confirmed that four of his top deputies had decided to resign in the fallout from the Justice Department’s push to end the corruption case against him and ensure his cooperation with Trump’s immigration crackdown.

New York Gov. Kathy Hochul said Monday she is weighing removing Adams from office.

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

Obama Judge Upholds Mass Gov’t Layoffs in Major Win for Trump and DOGE

(Headline USA)  A federal judge refused Tuesday to immediately block billionaire Elon Musk and the Department of Government Efficiency from accessing government data systems or participating in worker layoffs.

U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan found that there are legitimate questions about Musk’s authority, but said there isn’t evidence of the kind of grave legal harm that would justify a temporary restraining order.

The decision came in a lawsuit filed by 14 Democratic states challenging DOGE’s authority to access sensitive government data. The attorneys general argued that Musk is wielding the kind of power that the Constitution says can only be held by those who are elected or confirmed by the Senate.

The Trump administration, for its part, has maintained that layoffs are coming from agency heads, and asserted that despite his public cheering of the effort Musk isn’t directly running DOGE’s day-to-day operations himself.

DOGE has tapped into computer systems across multiple agencies with the blessing of President Donald Trump, digging into budgets and searching for what he calls waste, fraud and abuse, even as a growing number of lawsuits allege DOGE is violating the law.

Chutkan recognized the concerns of the group of states, which include New Mexico and Arizona.

“DOGE’s unpredictable actions have resulted in considerable uncertainty and confusion,” she wrote. Their questions about Musk’s apparent “unchecked authority” and lack of Congressional oversight for DOGE are legitimate and they may be able to successfully argue them later.

Still, at this point, it remains unclear exactly how DOGE’s work will affect the states, and judges can only issue court only issue orders to block specific, immediate harms, she found.

Chutkan, who was nominated by Democratic President Barack Obama, previously oversaw the now-dismissed criminal election interference case against Trump in Washington, D.C.

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

 

DOGE Says it Has Saved Taxpayers $55 Billion So Far

(The Center Square) – The month-old Department of Government Efficiency led by billionaire Elon Musk has saved American taxpayers $55 billion, according to the latest update from the group.

Its ‘Wall of Receipts’ on its new website catalogues where the department has made cuts and how much those cuts are worth. The biggest line item on ‘the wall’ is one from the Department of Homeland Security for $8 billion. The U.S. Agency for International Development appears the most in DOGE’s records and so far, shows more than $6.5 billion slashed from its budget, according to the site, though it is still being updated. USAID and the Department of Education top DOGE’s list for ‘total contract savings’ for government agencies. The DHS is sixth.

On Feb. 14, with a nod to Valentine’s Day, DOGE posted a rhyming update on social media platform X about its work.

“Roses are red, violets are blue, Today, DOGE and 10 agencies made 586 wasteful contracts bid adieu!”

The post went on to specifically mention an $8.2 million U.S. Department of Agriculture contract for “environmental compliance services for the implementation of pilot projects developed under the partnership for climate smart commodities”.

The department has also defunded various diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives across the government. The savings it has found are “a combination of fraud detection/deletion, contract/lease cancellations, contract/lease renegotiations, asset sales, grant cancellations, workforce reductions, programmatic changes, and regulatory savings.”

DOGE, created by an executive order on President Donald Trump’s first day in office, is embroiled in controversy  over whether it is surpassing the Constitutional authority of the executive branch. There is also concern over Elon Musk’s role as a “special government employee” and conflicts of interest that may arise.

For now, though, the cuts keep rolling in.

A Disturbance in the Force: Mark Hamill’s Pants Fall down During Speech

(Maire Clayton, Headline USA) Legendary Star Wars actor and turbo-liberal activist Mark Hamill appeared to have a wardrobe malfunction as he presented during the British Academy Film Awards on Sunday.

The event occurred at London’s Royal Festival Hall, according to the U.K. outlet The Sun.

“Mark started speaking then his suit trousers just dropped to his knees,” a source who was at the award show told the outlet. “It was like they were too big for him.”

The anonymous source noted that people in attendance seemed shock by the 73-year-old losing his pants.

“All the big stars such as Timothée Chalamet, Ariana Grande, Adrien Brody would have seen it from their angle. Most guests looked horrified but said nothing,” the source continued. “It was a moment that you wouldn’t have believed unless you saw it.”

The actor who played the iconic role of Luke Skywalker was presenting the award for this years best film when the incident occurred.

The clip quickly circulated on social media with the majority making fun of the incident.

“You would think with his amount of money he could afford to buy pants that actually fit him,” one user wrote.

Others expressed how it was impressive Hamill was able to recover as he spoke about the uniqueness of cinema.

“They create immersive cinematic landscapes that feel live whether they’re set here in London or anywhere you imagine they can take you,” he said as he managed to pick his pants back up.

“This dude’s pants fell down and he continued talking as if nothing happened,” Collin Rugg wrote on X. “Pretty impressive tbh.”

Hamill was previously in the news for how much he dislikes President Donald Trump. When Trump returned to the White House, the actor stated he would be doing a weeklong “symbolic protest” on social media.

ICE Van Bursts into Flames in Philadelphia, Igniting Speculation about Left-Wing Terrorism

(Ken Silva, Headline USA) An Immigration and Customs Enforcement burst into flames Tuesday in Philadelphia, igniting speculation that the incident could have been an act of terrorism by left-wing or pro-immigration zealots.

“A minivan operated by ICE has reportedly been set ablaze during operations in Philadelphia,” conservative pundit Charlie Kirk posted on Twitter/X, reacting to the breaking news. “If found to be intentional, which it appears to be, this is literal leftwing terrorism to make sure our country continues to be invaded.”

However, Kirk jumped the gun, according to Philadelphia authorities. A spokesperson for the Philadelphia Fire Department reportedly told the Daily Beast that the fire was accidental and not an act of protest, while an ICE spokesperson confirmed the same.

“The Philadelphia Fire Department extinguished the flames after arriving on scene. There were no injuries due to the fast response from the fire department and the vehicle’s occupants,” an ICE spokesperson told Newsweek Tuesday afternoon. “The cause of the fire is unknown, but no foul play is suspected at this time.”

Still, the conflagration of the ICE van comes at time when liberal protests are occurring across the country—many of them promoting calls for violence against Donald Trump and Elon Musk.

At a Monday rally in DC, for instance, a reporter for conservative personality Laura Loomer spotted one protestor holding a sign featuring a picture of the Luigi cartoon character coupled with the slogan, “Deny, Defend, Depose”—a reference to alleged left-wing assassin, Luigi Mangione, and the words he wrote on the bullets he used to murder an insurance CEO.

Meanwhile, liberal politicians from Gov. Phil Murphy, D-N.J., to Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-NY, are calling on illegal immigrants to openly flaunt the law.

Ken Silva is the editor of Headline USA. Follow him at x.com/jd_cashless.

Proposal Would Keep Violent Criminals from Seeking Asylum

(Alan Wooten, The Center Square) Violent criminals of other nations should not be allowed to seek asylum in the United States, says a North Carolina congressman.

U.S. Rep. Rev. Mark Harris, R-N.C., on Thursday introduced No Asylum for Criminals Act, backed by eight cosponsors that included Rep. Chuck Edwards, R-N.C., and three congressmen in southern border states.

“After the Biden administration abused the law to intentionally let illegal aliens in our country, it’s clear we need to strengthen asylum law,” Harris said in a release. “Allowing convicted felons to enter the U.S. not only risks the safety of American citizens, but it also risks the safety of other asylum seekers and adds to the backlog of claims.”

Immigration Accountability Project has endorsed the measure.

The proposal amends the Immigration and Nationality Act for authority of the attorney general in relation to felonies or misdemeanors. Nonpolitical crimes and threats to U.S. security are also reasons for denial.

More than a dozen proposals on immigration involve North Carolina senators and representatives either as authors or cosponsors.

Cosponsors include Republican Reps. Andy Biggs of Arizona, and Randy Weber and Keith Self of Texas. Also signing on are Rep. Nancy Mace, R-S.C., Rep. Barry Moore, R-Ala., Rep. Marlin Stutzman, R-Ind., and Rep. Andy Ogles, R-Tenn.

White House Says Elon Musk Isn’t a Member of DOGE

(Headline USA) The White House says billionaire Elon Musk is not the administrator of the Department of Government Efficiency team that is sweeping through federal agencies, but is rather a senior adviser to President Donald Trump.

Musk’s exact role could be key in the legal fight over DOGE’s access to government data as the Trump administration moves to lay off thousands of federal workers. Defining him as an adviser rather that the person in charge of day-to-day operations at DOGE could help the administration beat a lawsuit arguing Musk has too much power for someone who isn’t elected or Senate-confirmed.

The declaration was filed Monday as the Trump administration fends off the lawsuit from several Democratic states that want to block Musk and the DOGE team from accessing government systems. The litigants say Musk is wielding “virtually unchecked power” in violation of the Constitution.

The Trump administration, on the other hand, says Musk has “no actual authority to make government decisions himself,” Joshua Fisher, director of the White House Office of Administration, said in court papers. The documents do not name the administrator of DOGE, whose work Musk has championed in posts on his social-media platform X and in a public appearance at the White House.

The DOGE team has roamed from agency to agency, tapping into computer systems, digging into budgets and searching for waste, fraud and abuse, while lawsuits pile up claiming Trump and DOGE are violating the law. At least two are targeting Musk himself.

U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan seemed skeptical in a hearing Monday when Justice Department lawyers asserted that Musk has no formal authority.

“I think you stretch too far. I disagree with you there,” Chutkan said.

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press.

Waiver Allowing California Gas Car Ban by 2035 Poised for Reversal

(Kenneth Schrupp, The Center Square) With a Congressional review of California car and truck standard waivers approved by the Biden administration, Congress appears set to effectively quash three rules, including the 2035 gas car ban.

The Environmental Protection Agency, led by Administrator Lee Zeldin, said it is following the law in sending the waivers. Twelve states and the District of Columbia would be subsequently impacted.

“The Biden administration failed to send rules on California’s waivers to Congress, preventing members of Congress from deciding on extremely consequential actions that have massive impacts and costs across the entire United States,” Zeldin said in an EPA release. “The Trump EPA is transparently correcting this wrong and rightly following the rule of law.”

Michael Regan was previously the leader of the EPA from 2021-24. It is unclear if the previous administration approved the waivers at the last minute to meet California’s request while understanding the rules could be rejected by the incoming majority-Republican Congress.

The waivers have a 60-day window for congressional review.

The EPA said the “two waivers regarding trucks not only increased the cost of those vehicles but also increased the costs of goods and the cost of living for American families across the country.”

The United States Clean Air Act authorizes California to set and enforce emissions standards more strict than the federal standard, so long as the EPA grants the state a waiver for each new standard. California alone has the right to self-regulate emissions due to its regulations for combating Los Angeles’ infamous smog predating the EPA’s existence.

While other states do not have the power to set air regulations, they do have the ability to choose to follow California’s more stringent regulations – which classify carbon dioxide, a nontoxic greenhouse gas, as pollution.

Advanced Clean Cars II is the most stringent regulation, a policy gradually moving new cars sales to zero emissions by 2035. Its impact in 2025 is in relation to model year 2026 vehicles. New passenger vehicle sales for model year 2026 are to be 35% zero emission or plug-in hybrid electric.

Twelves states and Washington, D.C., follow the standards, covering cover nearly half of America’s new light-duty vehicle and over a quarter of its heavy-duty vehicle market.

Advanced Clean Fleets is similar. It regulates trucking fleets, and may have an even larger impact on most Americans due to the nation’s reliance on California ports and thus California trucking for receiving and distributing Asian imports.

A third rule reducing permitted nitrogen oxide emissions 90% from diesel-powered trucks – which move 64% of the nation’s freight by weight and 72% by value – would also have likely resulted in increased costs for consumers as freight companies retire still-usable vehicles for new, lower-emission or zero-emission models. Transportation tends to account for 7% in the cost of goods, meaning significant increases in transportation costs can result in higher prices for goods.

“California has longstanding authority to request waivers from EPA to protect its residents from dangerous air pollution coming from mobile sources like cars and trucks,” Regan said at the time of the waivers’ December approval.

He said the approvals “follow through on EPA’s commitment to partner with states to reduce emissions and act on the threat of climate change.”

Trump to Sign New Executive Orders While His 1st Joint TV Interview w/ Musk Airs in Prime Time

(Headline USA) President Donald Trump on Tuesday was set to sign new executive orders from his Florida home while his first joint TV interview with adviser Elon Musk airs in prime time.

Trump’s Florida home will also be the setting for an awards program by a conservative group led by Mike Flynn, who briefly served as national security adviser in the Republican president’s first term.

Trump was spending part of Tuesday at his golf club in West Palm Beach, Florida.

The White House had no immediate comment on the executive actions Trump was signing later Tuesday at Mar-a-Lago, his private club and residence in Palm Beach. In the first weeks of Trump’s second term, he has used executive orders — signed statements about how the president wants the federal government to be managed — to address issues including border security, the environment and transgender rights.

Trump and Musk, head of the new Department of Government Efficiency, gave their first joint interview to Sean Hannity of Fox News Channel. The interview was taped on Friday at the White House and is set to air as Musk leads Trump’s effort to cut federal spending and slash the federal workforce.

Musk has drawn criticism from Democrats for the methods he and his team at DOGE are using to cut spending, including foreign aid, and eliminate jobs across the bureaucracy.

The Fox News interview also follows Musk’s appearance with Trump in the Oval Office last week, when both defended Musk’s approach to federal cost-cutting.

In an excerpt from the interview that Fox News released on Sunday, Musk said he “used to be adored by the left” but “less so these days” because of the work he’s doing at Trump’s direction.

“They call it Trump derangement syndrome. You don’t realize how real this is until you can’t reason with people,” Musk said, adding that normal conversations with Democrats about the president are impossible because “it’s like they’ve become completely irrational.”

Trump’s Mar-a-Lago club is the setting Tuesday night for an awards program by America’s Future, which is led by Flynn to preserve individual rights and promote American values and traditions, according to its website. The event, celebrating American exceptionalism, will honor one member from the Army, the Navy, the Marines, the Air Force and the Space Force.

The event includes a poolside reception, musical performances and dinner in Mar-a-Lago’s Grand Ballroom, where other award presentations are expected from a lineup that includes such names as Russell Brand, Ted Nugent and Mike Tyson.

It’s unclear whether Trump will participate in the event.

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press.

Auditing America’s Gold Is Not Just Important, It’s Critical

(Jp Cortez, Money Metals News Service) An X exchange over the weekend is bringing new light to an issue long shrouded in mystery — the status of America’s purported stockpile of 8,133 tons of gold stored in Fort Knox and other government vaults across the country.

News aggregator ZeroHedge tweeted at President Trump’s head of government efficiency, Elon Musk, “It would be great if @elonmusk could take a look inside Fort Knox just to make sure the 4,580 tons of US gold is there. Last time anyone looked was 50 years ago in 1974.”

Mr. Musk responded, “Surely it’s reviewed at least every year?”

Senator Paul of Kentucky then jumped in, tweeting, “Nope. Let’s do it.”

A national leader on this front, American bullion dealer Money Metals jumped into the viral fray on X, urging passage of legislation sponsored by the former congressman, Alex Mooney, the Gold Reserve Transparency Act.

The stated goal of Mr. Mooney’s bill is to “provide for the first true audit of gold owned by the United States in more than 65 years, and subsequent audits every 5 years.”

The bill, the bullion dealer contended on X, “would require regular, credible audits of America’s gold,” which would include “an accounting of any pledges, leases, swaps, or other encumbrances placed upon U.S. gold by BIS, the Exchange Stabilization Fund, the Fed, or other government people.”

It’s understandable why one might think America, the country with the largest gold stockpile, would occasionally audit its vault holdings, similar to the way any private depository would.

However, since the last credible audit in the 1950s, America’s gold reserves have been subject to limited, flawed, and theatrical inspections.

In 1974, the government conducted a highly publicized inspection of Fort Knox gold –wherein members of Congress and a few media viewed just a single gold compartment –that did not qualify as an audit in any respect.

This public relations spectacle was followed by a somewhat more credible process by the General Accounting Office and the Department of the Treasury that kicked off in 1974 and concluded in 1986.

Putting aside the fact this was not a truly independent audit, Money Metals gold researcher Jan Nieuwenhuijs has discovered that roughly half of the government reports from this process are now missing and seals on some of the gold compartments appear to have been tampered with at various times.

With a renewed desire for government transparency, Mr. Musk and his team of auditors could turn their focus to one of America’s greatest open questions.

Since 2014, the Sound Money Defense League, which I head, has been pushing for an audit of America’s gold, including securing the introduction of the “Gold Reserve Transparency Act.”

Other proposed legislation, including H.R. 2559 in 2019, and H.R. 3526 in 2021, called for the Comptroller General of the United States to conduct and complete the following procedures at least once every five years:

— A full assay, inventory, and audit of all gold reserves, including any gold in “deep storage,” of the United States at the place or places where such reserves are kept;

— An analysis of the sufficiency of measures taken to ensure the physical security of such reserves;

— A full accounting of any and all encumbrances, including those due to lease, swap, or similar transactions presently in existence or entered into at any time during the past 15 years with respect to the gold reserves;

— A full accounting of any and all sales, purchases, disbursements, or receipts at any time during the past 15 years – whether directly or indirectly undertaken – with respect to the gold reserves, including the specific terms and parties involved in such transactions;

— A full accounting of all gold in which the American government, including the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System or any other federal agency, presently has a direct or indirect interest. That includes gold that may be held by third parties, including, say, the Bank of International Settlements, the International Monetary Fund, the Exchange Stabilization Fund, any foreign central bank, or any other party, public or private.

This full accounting would be completed within nine months of the law’s enactment and would then be done every 5 years thereafter.

For good measure, the comptroller general’s report shall be made available to the public, and no redactions would be permitted — except to protect sensitive details regarding physical security.

An audit like this has drawn support from sound money champions like the former congressman, Dr. Ron Paul, and a former Trump nominee to the Federal Reserve, economist Judy Shelton.

A longtime advocate for American gold transparency, Chris Powell of the Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee said, “the big issue is not so much whether gold remains in the depository as much as whether it is encumbered by leases or swaps undertaken by the Federal Reserve or the Treasury Department.”

While the sound money movement at the state level have seen success over the last decade, federal progress towards restoring sound money leaves everything to be desired, including lack of support for a bill that would block the IRS from assessing a 28% federal capital gains tax on the monetary metals.

If America wants to shore up confidence in its currency, it must begin with a comprehensive audit of the country’s classical monetary asset — gold.

Originally published on NYSun.


Jp Cortez is the Executive Director of the Sound Money Defense League, an organization working to remonetize gold and silver through nationwide legislative efforts. He is a graduate of Auburn University and a resident of Charlotte, North Carolina. Jp is the lead author of the Sound Money Index. Follow him on X (Twitter) @JpCortez27.