Saturday, April 18, 2026

Trump Rejects Reports That US Proposed Iran Suspend Uranium Enrichment for 20 Years

(Dave DeCamp, Antiwar.com) ​​President Donald Trump on Tuesday rejected reports that said the US has proposed to Iran to freeze uranium enrichment for 20 years, suggesting that he wants a permanent end to Iran’s nuclear enrichment program.

The president made the comments to the New York Post and again conflated the idea of any uranium enrichment with the pursuit of nuclear weapons, even though Tehran has been willing to cap uranium enrichment at very low levels far below the 90% enrichment needed for a weapon.

“I’ve been saying they can’t have nuclear weapons, so I don’t like the 20 years,” the president said. When asked whether a 20-year moratorium could work as a deal, since it could allow Iran to sell it as a win, Trump said, “I don’t want them to feel like they have a win.”

Before the war, Iran was willing to suspend uranium enrichment for three to five years since its program was already effectively frozen by the June 2025 US airstrikes on its nuclear facilities. The New York Times reported that Iran responded to the US proposal for a 20-year suspension by again offering a five-year pause.

Iran is not expected to capitulate to the US demand to never enrich uranium, which Joe Kent, a former senior Trump administration official who resigned over opposition to the Iran war, has described as a “poison pill” meant to serve Israel’s interest in the US continuing the war.

“The Israelis push for zero uranium enrichment because they know it’s a poison pill for Iran & will result in the war continuing,” Kent, who stepped down from his role as the head of the National Counterterrorism Center, said in a post on X on Monday.

Trump also suggested in his comments to the Post that another round of talks between the US and Iran could take place in Pakistan in “two days,” though the status of the negotiations is unclear. The US military is currently enforcing its own blockade on the Strait of Hormuz and has said that it will block ships that are heading to or departing from Iranian ports.

This article originally appeared at Antiwar.com.  

7-Eleven Expects to Close Hundreds of its Stores in North America This Year

(Headline USA) Convenience chain 7-Eleven expects to close hundreds of its locations this year.

According to earnings filings published last week, 7-Eleven’s North American operator plans to close 645 stores in the 2026 fiscal year — outpacing the 205 locations it forecasts it will open during that same time.

Seven & i Holdings Co., the Japan-based parent of the convenience chain, noted that these closures “include the conversion to wholesale fuel stores.” Financial documents show that 7-Eleven Inc. has steadily opened new wholesale fuel stores in North America over recent years, which accounted for more than 900 locations as of December 2025.

The company did not immediately explain the closures or specify which locations could be impacted. The Associated Press reached out for further information.

According to the company’s website, there are over 86,000 7-Eleven stores across 19 countries today. 7-Eleven Inc., the brand’s North American operator based in Texas, oversees more than 13,000 locations in the United States and Canada.

The convenience giant has closed hundreds of underperforming locations over the years, and the latest cuts arrive as higher prices strain consumers worldwide. The U.S. and Israel’s war against Iran has especially rattled energy markets, with drivers now facing soaring gas prices.

Consumers were facing stubborn inflation even before the war. In North America specifically, Seven & i noted in its April 9 report, “although the economy remained robust, personal consumption also began to soften” for the 2025 fiscal year — “particularly among low-income households, as inflation continued to weigh on spending.”

Openings for Seven & i subsidiaries outside of North America are set to outpace the stores they’re closing — including Seven-Eleven Japan, which expects to close 350 stores and open 550 locations, per financial filings.

Seven & i expects its revenue to fall 9.4% for the current fiscal year, totaling a projected nearly 9.45 trillion yen (about $59.5 billion).

The company has been looking for new opportunities for growth, and last year outlined a wider transformation plan aimed at boosting its convenience store offerings. Among goals, Seven & i has said it would invest in more fresh food offerings and expand its “7NOW” delivery service.

The changes also arrive under new leadership. Stephen Hayes Dacus became Seven & i’s CEO last spring.

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

Trump Urges Extending Foreign Surveillance Program as Some Lawmakers Push for US Privacy Protections

(Headline USA) Congress is set to take up the reauthorization of a divisive program that lets U.S. spy agencies pore over foreigners’ calls, texts and emails, with supporters like President Donald Trump saying it has saved lives while critics point to longstanding concerns about warrantless surveillance of Americans.

A key provision of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act permits the CIA, National Security Agency, FBI and other agencies to collect and analyze vast amounts of overseas communications without a warrant. It incidentally sweeps up the conversations of any Americans who interact with those foreigners targeted for surveillance.

The program expires Monday, and critics want changes, including a requirement for warrants before authorities can access the emails, phone calls or text messages of Americans. They also want limits on the government’s use of internet data brokers, who sell large volumes of personal information gleaned online, offering the government what critics say amounts to an end-run around the Constitution.

Despite bipartisan criticism, the chances of significant reforms dropped when Trump announced his support for the program’s renewal, saying it had proven its worth in supplying information vital to recent U.S. actions in Venezuela and Iran.

“The fact is, whether you like FISA or not, it is extremely important to our military,” Trump said on social media Tuesday.

U.S. authorities say the program, known as Section 702 of the law, is vital to national security and has saved lives by uncovering terror plots. Critics question what they call a dangerous infringement on civil liberties and privacy.

In a Truth Social post, Trump said a different FISA provision was used to spy on his 2016 campaign but that he supported Section 702’s renewal despite misgivings that political adversaries could use parts of the law against him in the future. He called on lawmakers to extend the foreign surveillance program for another 18 months.

“My administration has worked tirelessly to ensure these FISA reforms are being aggressively executed at every level of the Executive Branch to keep Americans safe, while protecting our sacred Civil Liberties guaranteed by our Great Constitution,” Trump wrote.

Trump is a longtime critic of the nation’s intelligence services and was once opposed to Section 702 before he reversed himself. “KILL FISA” Trump posted on social media in 2024, when the provision was last reauthorized.

Trump isn’t the only one-time critic to change their mind: Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard sponsored legislation to repeal Section 702 as a Hawaii congresswoman but now supports it after being tapped to coordinate the nation’s 18 intelligence agencies.

Gabbard says new protections added since her time in Congress helped change her mind.

In addition to a requirement for a warrant to access Americans’ data, critics also want greater protections on how the FBI or other agencies can search communications and how that is reported to the public.

“Journalists, foreign aid workers, people with family overseas, all could have their communications swept up in this surveillance merely because they talked to someone outside of this country,” said Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore. The longtime critic of the law is pushing for changes that he said will ensure the government isn’t violating civil rights in secret.

Several Republicans also have suggested changes, such as the warrant requirement.

“National security and civil liberties are not mutually exclusive,” said Rep. Andy Biggs, R-Ariz. “We can give our intelligence professionals the tools they need to target foreign threats while ensuring that Americans are not subjected to unconstitutional surveillance.”

Gabbard’s office releases an annual report showing the number of foreign surveillance targets and number of searches likely to identify an American.

For 2025, the number of foreign surveillance targets increased to nearly 350,000 from almost 292,000 in 2024. Searches using terms likely to identify an American decreased slightly to 7,724 from 7,845 in 2024.

The totals are incomplete because agencies like the FBI have found ways to access the data without reporting the searches publicly, said Elizabeth Goitein, senior director of the Liberty and National Security Program at the Brennan Center for Justice at New York University.

FBI officials repeatedly violated their own standards when searching for intelligence related to the Jan. 6, 2021, insurrection at the U.S. Capitol and racial justice protests in 2020, according to a 2024 court order.

“It’s reminiscent of J. Edgar Hoover’s tenure at the FBI,” Goitein said, referring to the FBI’s founding director who used illegal surveillance to harass and spy on Americans. “They can pretty much target anyone.”

Despite bipartisan concerns about the law and its implications for civil liberties, time is running out for Congress to make any changes before Monday’s expiration.

Trump’s support also reduces the odds that enough Republicans will break ranks and join Democrats to push for reforms.

Wyden said Section 702 votes are routinely delayed until the last minute, then lawmakers are told that national security demands they vote yes. Lawmakers are told, he said, that “if they vote for any amendments, the program will die and terrible things will happen and it will be all their fault.”

The best chance for inserting changes likely is the House, where a large number of lawmakers from both parties have expressed concerns.

But Rep. Rick Crawford, an Arkansas Republican who chairs the House Intelligence Committee, is backing Trump’s call for an 18-month renewal.

Crawford has taken aim in the past at what he calls the weaponization of intelligence but said last month that he believes the government can empower spy agencies while also holding them accountable.

“We can walk and chew gum at the same time,” Crawford said.

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

U.S. Considers Gas Tax Holiday

(Brett Rowland, The Center Square) Americans could soon pay more at the pump as the U.S.-Iran conflict disrupts oil markets, while lawmakers debate suspending the federal gas tax, a move Canada has just taken.

Similar plans have been discussed in the U.S., but have yet to advance. In early March, Democrats in both the U.S. House and Senate proposed suspending the 18.4 cents-per-gallon federal gas tax through Oct. 1. Some states have also proposed suspending their state-level gas taxes. Canada’s federal gas tax is about 28 cents a gallon.

Carney’s announcement on Tuesday came after marathon talks between the U.S. and Iran failed to make progress on Monday, even after the two sides agreed to a tentative two-week ceasefire. The conflict has brought ship traffic through the Strait of Hormuz to a standstill, disrupting global oil markets and sending prices up.

Carney said the government is temporarily suspending the federal Fuel Excise Tax on gasoline and diesel across Canada, effective April 20. The move is expected to save Canadian motorists money at the pump, but will cost the government about $2.4 billion in revenue (about $1.74 billion in U.S. dollars). The government is also temporarily suspending the federal Fuel Excise Tax on aviation fuels.

“We’re cutting your taxes, reducing the costs of your homes, and providing you relief at the pump,” Carney said in a statement.

The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, a U.S.-based think tank, found suspending the U.S. federal gas tax would cost about $3.5 billion a month and speed up the insolvency of the Highway Trust Fund. Federal gas tax revenue goes into the Highway Trust Fund to pay for the interstate highway system and other infrastructure.

The group said suspending the U.S. tax would only marginally help consumers while adding to the federal government’s growing debt.

Gas prices could continue to climb for American motorists, said Patrick De Haan, head of petroleum analysis at GasBuddy.

“Wth a breakdown in talks and renewed escalation over the weekend, motorists should prepare for another round of price increases,” he said. “The move toward a full blockade of the Strait of Hormuz is compounding global supply concerns and risks further disrupting flows … As a result, gasoline prices are likely to jump again this week, with diesel expected to follow, until there is a meaningful restoration of shipping through the Strait.”

On Monday, U.S. talks with the Islamic Republic stalled. The existing ceasefire is expected to end on April 21.

Despite the ceasefire, gas prices remain high due to a complex mix of reduced oil supply, ongoing shipping disruptions and seasonal demand. As global oil flows remain restricted and summer travel increases, consumers seeking relief at the pump may have to wait. The U.S.-Iran ceasefire has not yet improved conditions in the Strait of Hormuz, where ship traffic remains well below pre-conflict levels.

Crude oil is the main factor affecting gasoline prices, which are driven by global supply and demand. Gasoline prices also reflect costs from refining, distribution, marketing, retail sales, and government taxes. The federal gas tax is 18.4 cents per gallon, with state taxes ranging from about 9 cents to over 70 cents per gallon, according to the American Petroleum Institute.

Prior to the two-week ceasefire, Trump had been threatening to destroy all of Iran. The ceasefire deal requires Iran to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, the crucial waterway that carries about 20% of the world’s oil and natural gas.

Since the conflict began at the end of February, U.S. gas prices have climbed more than 60 cents per gallon. The national average was $4.118 per gallon on Tuesday, according to AAA.

The ongoing conflict with Iran has pushed oil prices to record highs. If it continues, experts warn that economic strain will grow, further affecting U.S. taxpayers. U.S. military operations, ongoing since late February, are costing an estimated $1 billion per day.

Analysts have noted that if the conflict continues for an extended period, it could drive a significant increase in defense spending and further impact the federal budget.

The Department of War may ask Congress for an additional $200 billion for Iran operations. It has not yet provided exact figures for a supplemental request. Trump recently unveiled a 2027 budget proposing a 44% increase in military spending to bolster the nation’s fighting forces. That would bring the U.S. defense budget to $1.5 trillion, if approved by Congress.

On Feb. 28, after nuclear talks with the Islamic Republic failed to produce a deal, the U.S. and Israel launched strikes on Iran.

Survey: Most U.S. Voters Hold Government Fraud Responsible for High Cost of Living

(Tate Miller, The Center Square) Concurrent with the Trump administration’s War on Fraud, a survey shows that most American voters believe government fraud is responsible for the nation’s high cost of living, with one expert saying that fraud is the “invisible tax.”

Utah Treasurer Marlo Oaks told The Center Square that the survey commissioned by the State Financial Officers Foundation “makes clear that Americans across the political spectrum are concerned about their tax dollars being lost to fraud and waste.”

“That concern reflects a straightforward reality,” Oaks said. “When accountability weakens, the financial burden ultimately falls on households.”

“Efforts to reduce the cost of living and to strengthen oversight are closely connected,” Oaks said.

“As financial officers, we are committed to ensuring that public funds are managed responsibly and transparently,” Oaks said.

“We will work with the Trump administration to protect taxpayer resources and reduce waste, fraud, and abuse,” Oaks said.

State Financial Officers Foundation is a collection of state treasurers, auditors, and comptrollers whose top job is to be a “watchdog of taxpayer dollars,” according to the organization’s media relations.

State Financial Officers Foundation CEO OJ Oleka told The Center Square in regards to his organization’s survey: “Americans rightly understand that fraud is the invisible tax worsening the affordability crisis.”

Oleka said that “taxpayer dollars being stolen and wasted by fraudsters isn’t just a criminal issue, it’s an economic one.”

“The Trump administration’s war on fraud and waste is popular, justified, and absolutely necessary for reducing the cost of living for American families,” Oleka said.

“Fortunately, dozens of principled state treasurers and auditors are bringing the same might to this fight as they brought to our battles against ESG, debanking, and every other threat to Americans’ financial security,” Oleka said.

According to the poll conducted by Deep Root Analytics for the State Financial Officers Foundation, 87% of U.S. voters are very concerned (50%) or somewhat concerned (37%) about “fraud or misuse of taxpayer money in government programs.”

Misuse of tax dollars is no doubt important to these pollees and their standard of living, since the total household income before taxes for 40% of them is less than $50,000 a year, according to the poll.

Eighty-three percent of surveyed voters believe that “fraud or misuse of government funds contributes to higher taxes or costs for families” a great deal (46%) or a fair amount (37%).

Additionally, 70% of voters believe “there is too little oversight over government spending and people who want to misuse taxpayer money have too easy of a time doing it.”

This same percentage believes the nation needs “more aggressive fraud investigation and prevention measures to ensure taxpayers’ money isn’t wasted.”

Interestingly, At 32%, those with “moderate” political views were the largest political bracket surveyed.

Thirty-seven percent of those polled identified as Republicans, while 38% identified as Democrats.

The survey was conducted in March 2026 and surveyed slightly more females (52%) than males (48%).

The Trump administration’s War on Fraud began March 2026, with the establishment of a “task force to eliminate fraud.”

At the beginning of April, Colin McDonald was sworn in by Vice President Vance to lead the new National Fraud Enforcement Division, with the State Financial Officers Foundation stating it is “exactly the accountability America needs.”

Biden Randomly Compares a Black Man to ‘Obama’ 

(Luis CornelioHeadline USA) Disgraced former President Joe Biden on Tuesday awkwardly referred to a black man at a New York event as Barack Obama, the only black president in U.S. history. 

Biden made the apparent comparison while unveiling his official portrait at Syracuse University College of Law when he singled out Jeffrey Scruggs, a black man and chairman of the university’s Board of Trustees. 

“I always want to turn around to one guy and say … ‘Barack, what are you doing?’” Biden said from the podium while pointing to Scruggs. 

The 46th president then urged Scruggs to stand and join him on stage, though Scruggs initially appeared reluctant. 

“Come here, come here, come here, come here … come here,” Biden added. 

When Scruggs approached, Biden continued, “I feel like he should be standing on the right and I should be standing on the left.” 

“Doesn’t he look like Barack?” Biden said of Scruggs. “As they say, you’ve done good, fella.” 

Video of the moment quickly went viral, with critics pointing to Biden’s long history of racially insensitive remarks over his decades in public life. 

Biden left office on Jan. 20, 2025, after being pushed out of the Democratic presidential ticket and replaced by then-Vice President Kamala Harris, who ultimately lost to President Donald Trump. 

Vance, Trump Not Budging on Iran Deal

(Sarah Roderick-Fitch, The Center Square) The ball is in Iran’s court, and the U.S. holds all the cards, Vice President JD Vance and President Donald Trump argue after exhaustive talks with the Islamic Republic stalled.

Vance, who just returned from a whirlwind trip to Pakistan after participating in talks with Iranian officials for 21 hours, gave his first major interview since the talks, with Fox News’ Bret Baier Monday evening.

“The ball is in the Iranian court,” Vance told Baier. The vice president reiterated that the U.S. has been “accommodating,” while not backing down on the Islamic Republic’s firm commitment to not develop nuclear weapons and ceasing to support terrorist proxies, such as Hezbollah, Hamas and the Houthis.

While the meeting failed to bear fruit, Vance said it allowed the U.S. to gain insight into the inner workings of how the Iranians negotiate.

“What we figured out is that they were unable, I think the team that was there was unable to cut a deal, and they had to go back to Tehran, either from the supreme leader or somebody else, and actually get approval to the terms that we had set,” said Vance.

To be sure, the new Supreme Leader of Iran, Mojtaba Khamenei, was appointed following the death of his father, Ali Khamenei, on the first day of strikes on the Islamic Republic. It has been rumored that the younger Khamenei was severely injured in the same strikes; some, including Trump, have even speculated on whether he is even alive.

The vice president underscored that the U.S. “must have the enriched material” as well as Iran not developing a nuclear weapon.

“And I think that if the Iranians are willing to meet us there, then this can be a very, very good deal for both countries,” Vance said. “If they’re not willing to meet us there, that’s up to them, that’s their decision.”

The president and vice president argue the U.S. has the military advantage, and is now adding economic pressure on the Islamic Republic following the blockade of Iranian ports that began Monday morning.

“We have the military advantage. We now have additional economic pressure that we’re applying on them through the blockade,” the vice president added.

Monday afternoon, the president told reporters that if a deal isn’t reached with Iran by the end of the ceasefire, which is set to expire April 21, “it won’t be pleasant for them.” Despite the warning, Trump added that the “right people” called the White House Monday morning and said, “they would like to work.”

Harvey Weinstein is Going on Trial Again in a New York Rape Case

(Headline USA) After years of legal troubles and prison, Harvey Weinstein is again going on trial on a rape charge in New York City.

Jury selection started Tuesday in the onetime movie mogul’s latest retrial, where jurors will weigh — for the third time — whether he raped hairstylist and actor Jessica Mann in a Manhattan hotel in 2013.

It’s a more streamlined proceeding than the array of allegations that were aired at Weinstein’s previous trials in New York and Los Angeles. The Oscar-winning producer denies all the accusations and declared in court this winter that he had “acted wrongly, but I never assaulted anyone.”

Still, the retrial is expected to last up to six weeks. Questioned about the length of the proceeding and whether they could be fair and impartial about the much-publicized case, more than 80 prospective jurors asked to be excused during initial screening Tuesday morning.

About 60 others remained for further questioning in the afternoon.

A surprise move from prosecutors

While Mann’s accusation may be familiar, specifics of the case may differ. In a surprise move before jury selection began Tuesday, prosecutors suggested they might seek to introduce a new piece of evidence — a remark that Weinstein allegedly made to a court officer six years ago.

According to Manhattan Assistant District Attorney Candace White, the officer told prosecutors last week that he was on hand for Weinstein’s February 2020 sexual assault conviction — which was later overturned — and heard Weinstein say: “If you had seen these girls, you would have done the exact same thing.”

Weinstein’s lawyers urged Judge Curtis Farber to keep any mention of the supposed remark out of his upcoming retrial.

“This sounds far-fetched,” defense attorney Marc Agnifilo said, adding that “it’s just too late” to introduce it.

A subject that was explored in prior trials — a claims fund for women who said Weinstein sexually mistreated them — likely won’t come up again. The defense team doesn’t intend to raise the subject, Farber said.

A new defense team

Agnifilo and his partners took on the case in February, when longtime Weinstein lawyer Arthur Aidala stepped aside from the retrial to focus on the former studio boss’ appeals and civil matters. Both Aidala and Agnifilo are well-known New York defense attorneys, but their litigation styles differ. Aidala is folksy, while Agnifilo is more buttoned-up.

Weinstein wielded significant clout in the entertainment industry, having built his reputation on such critical and popular hits as “Shakespeare in Love,” “Pulp Fiction” and “Chocolat.” He also became a prominent Democratic donor.

Then a series of sexual harassment and sex assault allegations against Weinstein began to emerge in news media in 2017, propelling the #MeToo movement.

He was criminally charged in New York in 2018 and in Los Angeles two years later.

A tangled series of trials

Weinstein went to trial and was convicted of some — but not all — counts in both cases. His initial New York convictions were overturned, spurring a retrial last year.

The retrial verdict was mixed: Weinstein was convicted of forcing oral sex on production assistant and producer Miriam Haley in 2006, but he was acquitted of forcibly performing oral sex on model-turned-psychotherapist Kaja Sokola. The jury didn’t decide on the rape charge involving Mann because the foreperson refused to keep deliberating.

Mann has testified that she had a consensual, on-and-off relationship with the then-married Weinstein. But when he cornered her in a Manhattan hotel room where she was staying on a weekend getaway, she protested, “I don’t want to do this,” she told jurors. She said he kept making advances and demands until she “just gave up.”

Weinstein hasn’t testified at any of his trials, but his lawyers have contended that he never had non-consensual sex. The defense claimed that his accusers willingly entertained his sexual overtures because they wanted his help in show business.

The women said Weinstein dangled his Hollywood influence to draw them into his orbit and then victimize them.

He’s appealing the Los Angeles verdict and is expected to appeal the New York conviction involving Haley. It carries the potential for up to 25 years in prison; no sentencing date has been set.

In this case, the rape charge is a lower-level felony punishable by up to four years behind bars. Weinstein, 73, already has served longer than that.

Weinstein has various health problems and uses a wheelchair. He told the judge in January that his “mental state is collapsing” in New York’s notorious Rikers Island jail.

The Associated Press generally does not identify people without their permission if they say they have been sexually assaulted. Haley, Mann and Sokola agreed to be named.

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

 

Indiana University Punishes Professor Over Male IQ Comments

(José Niño, Headline USA) Longtime economics expert Eric Rasmusen claims Indiana University blocked his emeritus status because of his past social media activity. Rasmusen left his position in 2021 but sought the title later to regain access to digital research libraries. 

The university recently informed him that they would not consider his request. This denial forces him to rely on colleagues to help him find academic papers. “If I continue to be denied access, I will accept that,” Rasmusen told The College Fix.

The conflict started in 2019 when Rasmusen shared a quote regarding intelligence and gender. The post stated that “Geniuses are overwhelmingly male because they combine outlier high IQ with moderately low Agreeableness and moderately low Conscientiousness.” Administrators responded by labeling his personal views as “vile and stupid” in a campus wide memo. 

While the school acknowledged First Amendment protections prevented his firing, they implemented blind grading and alternative classes for his students. National Association of Scholars President Peter Wood argues that withholding this honor is highly unusual. He noted that such titles are typically free for the school to grant. 

Wood suggested that only extreme misconduct like fraud or serious crimes justifies such a move. Rasmusen maintains his academic record is strong, noting his book has been translated into many languages and he held guest roles at Yale and Harvard.

Rasmusen has decided against taking the school to court. He believes legal battles drain energy and create bitterness. Instead, he uses his Substack to address the claims made against him. He clarified that he does not oppose women in the workforce and noted that his own wife taught at a university. 

He also defended his stance on admissions by arguing that “Affirmative action may be right; it may be wrong; but that’s what it is.” Indiana University officials have not provided comments regarding the specific criteria used to reject his application.

José Niño is the deputy editor of Headline USA. Follow him at x.com/JoseAlNino 

Report: Taxpayers to Spend $477 Billion on Tax Season

(Andrew Rice, The Center Square)  Taxpayers are expected to spend 6.93 billion hours and more than $477 billion to be in compliance with the 2026 tax filing season, according to a new report released Monday.

Tax Day is Wednesday. The National Taxpayers Union Foundation released a report with estimates on how much time and money Americans are expected to spend.

The report estimated the average American will spend 12 hours and $290 to complete their tax return. The report anticipated a decrease in compliance burdens from its peak of 7.93 billion hours in 2023.

The report estimates that tax compliance costs include $319.7 billion in lost time and at least $157.1 billion in out-of-pocket expenses, including tax software and professional services.

“Time is money,” said Damien Brady, vice president of research at NTUF.

The report found the current tax code contains 4.26 million words and contains provisions that may overcomplicate tax burdens. Brady told The Center Square he was shocked to discover the tax code’s word count length.

“When they first implemented the tax laws it was only supposed to impact just the very wealthy and it was just a few pages long,” Brady said. “Now, there’s hundreds and hundreds of pages of regulations that implement the tax laws.”

The report noted that the tax provisions in the One Big Beautiful Bill and the Tax Cuts and Working Families Act simplified tax compliance burdens for 30 million additional Americans. The report noted that legislation nearly doubled the standard deduction from $6,500 to $12,000 for single filers and from $13,000 to $24,000 for married filers.

In 2024, 90% of Americans took the standard deduction rather than itemizing their deductions. Brady said he expects this legislation to show large benefits.

“It’s a pretty significant time savings for those people versus all the time that would go into itemizing,” Brady said.

The report also found that business owners are paying more in compliance burdens when they do taxes. In tax year 2025, businesses spent, on average, 21 hours filling out the 1040 form, compared to individual filers who only spent eight hours on average.

“It’s time and out-of-pocket expenses that are being diverted from, especially on the business side, investing back into your businesses, hiring new people, increasing productivity,” Brady said. “It’s something to be aware of whenever Congress is enacting new legislation.”

The report also found inflation would play a significant factor in the increased tax burden. The estimated $477 billion in compliance costs is a record high for the estimate.

“The cost of goods have increased first as a result of the pandemic, and the shortages and the shipping issues,” Brady said. “Currently, we’re seeing it again with high gas prices that will flow throughout the economy.”

The report attributed reductions in compliance hours to improved IRS models and simplification of the tax code. Brady called on the IRS to produce tax compliance reports once again in order to give lawmakers more clarity on what portions of the process are most complex.

“There’s administrative things you can do to ease compliance burdens by providing clearer guidance in places where there’s a lot of confusion,” Brady said.

He said there are many areas of the tax code that are out of scope when an individual attempts to access help.

“There’s certain things that they are not allowed to answer,” Brady said. He also called on the IRS to implement clearer guidelines for digital asset regulation and 1099-D forms.

“There’s a lot of data flowing through the IRS and we want to make sure that data is protected and secure,” Brady said.

The report is based on documentation provided by the IRS that estimates time and out-of-pocket costs that taxpayers take on when complying with tax forms. NTUF compiled all information on compliance costs across the various forms of which the IRS provided information.

Brady called on Congress to review the report and seek legislation designed to provide a better tax filing experience for taxpayers across the country. He pointed to the proposed Taxpayer Assistance and Service Act as a model piece of legislation for the future tax code.

The act would digitize tax returns and correspondence, mandate the IRS provide annual tax complexity reports and make the IRS more responsive to taxpayers who need help.

“There’s some good things in there as a starting point for Congress to improve the IRS and improve the administration of the tax code,” Brady said. “Americans definitely deserve a better tax system.”