Sunday, April 20, 2025

Bill Clinton Caught Ogling Ariana Grande at Aretha Franklin’s Funeral

0

‘Oh my. Bill Clinton is creepy as hell…’

(Ben Sellers, Liberty Headlines) Paging “Saturday Night Live” and “To Catch a Predator.”

A moment of potential comedy gold—or was it pure horror—transpired Friday at the funeral for “Queen of Soul” Aretha Franklin.

As 25-year-old Ariana Grande, a former Nickelodeon child actor, serenaded the audience with the Carole King song “(You Make Me Feel Like) A Natural Woman,” made famous by Franklin, ex-President Bill Clinton was caught struggling to keep his eyes up top.

Clinton was spotted in the front row (alongside Louis Farrakhan, Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson), with wife Hillary nowhere in sight—though reportedly in attendance.

The Rev. Jackson also appeared to admire the view.

Bill Clinton later was photographed posing with the newly engaged Grande and her fiance, former “SNL” Weekend Update anchor Pete Davidson.

Social media simultaneously cringed and relished in the gaffe.

However, in the year since the #MeToo movement launched, many have called on the leering Democrat to finally be held accountable for his bevvy of past sexual harassment allegations (among other things).

At least, he could show a little R-E-S-P-E-C-T.

WaPo/ABC Survey Claims 49 Percent Support Trump Impeachment

0

‘I can see how at a moment in time 49 percent of the public would think impeachment proceedings are at least worth exploring…’

Poll: Trump Approval Drops to Lowest Point Since Inauguration(Ben Sellers, Liberty Headlines) A survey conducted jointly by The Washington Post and ABC News released on Friday showed a growing number of respondents supported impeachment of President Donald Trump and disapproved of his job performance.

However, tell-tale signs of sampling bias and other questions of survey methodology undermined the confidence interval, as many remain skeptical of political polling in the wake of the 2016 election.

According to the survey, which claimed to have a margin of error of 3.5 percent, 49 percent of respondents agreed that Congress should begin impeachment proceedings on the president (including 40 percent who strongly agreed), while only 46 percent disagreed (33 percent strongly).

The survey says it randomly sampled 1003 adults nationally, both by landline and cell phone. For a confidence level of 99 percent with the provided margin of error, however, it would have needed to survey about 350 more adults given the U.S. adult population of approximately 250 million.

Instead, the left-leaning news organizations chose to accept a significantly weaker confidence level (opening the possibility that the entire survey could be bunk) to fit their margin of error within the spread.

But assuming the survey results were an accurate statistical reflection of the population sampled, the bigger concern would be whether the sample itself accurately reflected the U.S. population.

As the investigative blog Zero Hedge explained in October 2016, many polling agencies, including the WaPo/ABC ones, systematically build in bias to their polling by oversampling certain segments of the population, even as they claim to be presenting a random sample.

Zero Hedge showed, based on the leaked John Podesta emails, that Hillary Clinton agents actively encouraged oversampling, resulting in such headlines as “Clinton Vaults to a Double Digit Lead, Boosted by Broad Disapproval of Trump” two weeks before the November 2016 election.

One clear indicator of oversampling on the latest survey may be reactions to the economy. Even if respondents were reacting on ethical questions to the double-whammy conviction of former Trump associate Paul Manafort and the guilty plea of Trump’s former lawyer, Michael Cohen, few could complain about the stock market surging to historic highs during the survey period.

However, the WaPo/ABC results found 45 percent approval to 47 percent disapproval (36 percent strongly) in Trump’s handling of the economy.

Despite conflicting data from a CNBC economic survey in late June, which showed a majority approval, the WaPo/ABC poll had Trump’s economic approval in decline since it last asked the question in April.

Recent surveys reported on by Liberty Headlines reveal that many small-business owners approve of Trump’s policies, while a majority of blue-collar laborers also favor the president.

The survey also suggested a precipitous decline of about 4 percent (or about 10 million U.S. adults) in Trump’s overall approval rating since April, with those approving at 36 percent and disapproving at 60 percent.

Despite the questions surrounding the survey methodology, as writer Dan Calabrese said, the results are nothing to scoff at with the midterm elections approaching.

“When you start with the fact that 40 percent of the electorate hates Trump no matter what he does, and you pound away at those themes day after day, sure, I can see how at a moment in time 49 percent of the public would think impeachment proceedings are at least worth exploring,” Calabrese wrote.

Trump has continued to hammer at the unprecedented bias in news coverage and social media. But he must beware of getting in over his head while appealing only to his core base of supporters.

FBI’s Server-Hacking Statement a Classic Non-denial Denial

‘Partisan politics, sadly, are very much at play within some of the leadership at the FBI…’

Hillary Clinton
Hillary Clinton/IMAGE: Bloomberg News via Youtube

(Ben Sellers, Liberty Headlines) From Bill Clinton’s redefining the meaning of is in the Monica Lewinsky scandal to ex-CIA Director John Brennan’s fast-and-loose liberties with the term civilian casualties in Obama-era drone strikes, the Left loves its word games.

So, with the Clintons and the intelligence community seemingly in collusion to bury reports on Hillary’s private email server getting hacked, it was only a matter of time before semantics was deployed.

After The Daily Caller first broke the news Tuesday—later tweeted by President Donald Trump—that it had confirmed Chinese hackers were able to access Hillary’s emails by inserting special code into the metadata, the FBI issued what seemed to be an unequivocal denial.

Fox News reported that the agency disputed the story by saying it “has not found any evidence the servers were compromised.”

But according to Rep. Louie Gohmert, this may only have been technically true because it was the FBI’s oversight agency, the Intelligence Community Instructor General’s office, that found the actual evidence during a forensic analysis.

In a statement he released on Wednesday, Gohmert called the FBI denial “very deceptive in its omission.”

After the ICIG had flagged the evidence for top FBI officials in 2015, including former counterintelligence chief Peter Strzok, the agency responded by doing nothing, Gohmert said.

Louie Gohmert and Peter Strzok
Louie Gohmert and Peter Strzok/IMAGE: CBS News via Youtube

“One thing has been made acutely clear,” he said, “partisan politics, sadly, are very much at play within some of the leadership at the FBI.”

According to Fox, the FBI eventually did conduct a “limited” intrusion analysis of the server, but was unable to recover all the equipment and server data for the relevant time.

Despite a congressional order to the contrary, Clinton had the server bleached sometime in early 2015, handing over only about 55,000 emails that were redacted at her discretion.

When asked about wiping the server in August 2015, she replied, “What, like with a cloth or something?”

On Fox’s “Tucker Carlson Tonight,” Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton pointed out another key omission in the denial: Nobody ever said the server wasn’t compromised.

While some in the left-wing media have used the very disputedness of the claim as reason to dismiss it whole-cloth, Fitton said the FBI’s motive to cover up was clear.

“The answer would be embarrassing,” he said, and it would “undermine the fiction that Hillary Clinton caused no damage and deserved no prosecution.”

However, Fitton said former FBI Director James Comey, who famously let Clinton off the hook in July 2016, was “the best witness” when he acknowledged that a foreign agency might easily have covered its tracks when hacking the unsecured server.

“No one has ruled out that her server has been compromised—in fact, Comey said, ‘We just assume it had been compromised.’”

Sources Confirm Clinton Server Hacked by Chinese; FBI Did Nothing

‘What are the odds that the FBI and DOJ are right on top of this?’

Hillary Clinton
Hillary Clinton/IMAGE: ABC 15 Arizona via Youtube

(Ben Sellers, Liberty Headlines) Chinese Intelligence may be up to its ears in yoga tips if reports prove true that its operatives secretly embedded code in Hillary Clinton’s private server metadata to receive a ‘courtesy copy’ of all her emails.

After it was hinted at in a July  12 House Judiciary Committee hearing with disgraced FBI official Peter Strzok, The Daily Caller investigated the matter and says it confirmed with two sources that the emails were, in fact, hacked.

A forensic analysis from the Intelligence Community Instructor General first brought the issue to light. But even after ICIG investigator Frank Rucker alerted Strzok, the FBI reportedly did nothing to follow up.

According to a Fox News report, the FBI continues to dispute the claims, saying it has found no evidence that Clinton’s servers were compromised.

However, previous ICIG investigations revealed FBI incompetence—or willful ignorance—in the Clinton email handling when it discovered emails stored on the unsecured server that were openly marked with a “C” denoting classified information.

In a text that Strzok sent to his mistress, Lisa Page, he acknowledged the blunder: “Holy cow, if the FBI missed this, what else was missed? … Remind me to tell you to flag for Andy [redacted] emails we (actually ICIG) found that have portion marks (C) on a couple of paras. DoJ was Very Concerned about this.”

Strzok sets up Twitter, GoFundMe accounts
Peter Strzok, PHOTO: Twitter

Despite being aware of the classified information breach, the FBI rushed to close its investigation on Clinton, with FBI Director James Comey claiming on a July 5, 2016 statement that “no reasonable prosecutor would charge her.”

Strzok was later fired for his biased and unprofessional conduct.

Fox also reported that after former Inspector General Chuck McCullough came forward publicly with concerns over the Clinton emails, he began to receive pushback on Capitol Hill from politicians such as Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., and was told to consider the “political consequences.”

Following the latest findings, President Donald Trump issued a pair of tweets calling on the FBI and Justice Department to follow up or risk further damage to their credibility.

Facebook Engineer: Company IS Biased Against Conservatives

‘We are a political monoculture that’s intolerant of different views…’

Facebook's Policies Leaked on Sex, Terrorism & Violence(Ben Sellers, Liberty Headlines) Just as last year’s #MeToo movement helped bring to the surface some of the biggest open secrets in Hollywood, recent backlash against conservative censorship from Silicon Valley is exposing a scandal that should surprise nobody.

For years, tech mega-companies like Google, Facebook and Twitter have skirted accusations of extreme left-wing bias, not only with respect to users, but also endemic in their company cultures.

Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey, after censoring right-wing radio host Alex Jones with a two-week suspension, last week acknowledged in an interview with CNN that the microblogging platform tilted to the left.

Google, which long maintained ties with the Obama administration and other liberal institutions, previously faced criticism for its “echo chamber” culture that was hostile to conservative employees. A report on Tuesday revealed the company to be actively suppressing conservative media in its search results, prompting President Donald Trump to issue an admonishment.

Facebook also has faced consumer criticism for bias in its former trending news algorithms and fact-checking practices, to name only a few concerns. Now, The New York Times reported on Tuesday, around 100 conservative Facebook employees have teamed up to challenge the hostile groupthink of leftists within the company culture.

Brian Amerige
Brian Amerige/PHOTO: LinkedIn

According to the article, the catalyst for the movement was an internal post titled “We Have a Problem with Political Diversity” from senior product engineer Brian Amerige, a self-described objectivist.

“We are a political monoculture that’s intolerant of different views,” Amerige wrote. “We claim to welcome all perspectives, but are quick to attack—often in mobs—anyone who presents a view that appears to be in opposition to left-leaning ideology.”

While their private group, “FB’ers for Political Diversity” has met with complaints from others in the company of roughly 25,000 employees, so far it has done nothing to get banned.

The group’s aim, according to the article, is “to create a space for ideological diversity within the company.”

According to the blog Zero Hedge, which posted what appeared to be the source memo, Amerige cited a litany of specific ways in which the company had been overtly hostile to conservatism, including tearing down posters that welcomed Trump supporters and removing PayPal chief Peter Thiel from their board.

Amerige also cited instances of people being fired or reported to human resources for supporting statements like “All Lives Matter,” criticizing Islamic human rights records or complaining about transgender art on display.

“We’re quick to suggest firing people who turn out to be misunderstood, and even quicker to conclude our colleagues are bigots.”

He said conservatives at the company lived in fear of being subjected to a modern-day lynch mob.

“They know that all the talk of ‘openness to different perspectives’ does not apply to causes of ‘social justice,’ immigration, ‘diversity’, and ‘equality.’ On this issues [sic], you can either keep quiet or sacrifice your reputation and career.”

Twitter Duplicitous After Children of NRA’s Dana Loesch Threatened

0

Social media site has no problem with accounts that suggest violence against conservatives and their families…

NRA spokesperson Dana Loesch
Dana Loesch (The Liberty Hound/Youtube)

(Ben Sellers, Liberty Headlines) It seems like only yesterday that Twitter and other social media sites took to their respective soapboxes about the imperative to balance community standards with the fundamental principles of free speech on their platforms.

But as National Rifle Association spokesperson Dana Loesch recently discovered, policing those ‘community standards’ is a one-way street.

The admittedly leftist shills of Silicon Valley reached their red line when right-wing broadcast personality Alex Jones, responding to the threat of censorship, told listeners to take up their “battle rifles.”

Twitter suspended Jones for two weeks for inciting violence, while sites like Apple and Youtube already had proceeded to delete his content over Jones’ since retracted statements that the 2012 Sandy Hook massacre was a false flag spearheaded by gun-control advocates.

Though the sites held forth that Jones’ ideas were justifiable censorship, Loesch found that actionable threats are not always covered, provided they support the left’s agenda.

Loesch posted on her Twitter Sunday a pair of screenshots: one showing a user named @MilanLegius who appears to be threatening the murder of Loesch’s children, and the other showing a reply from Twitter Support indicating that there was no violation of the platform’s rules.

After 12,000 retweets, 20,000 likes and 2,700 comments, Twitter finally responded by reviewing the complaint, and was conveniently able to find the issue.

It wasn’t the first case of hypocrisy by any stretch in the left’s lopsided crusade against violence.

While arguing the immorality of President Donald Trump’s executive action to suspend the “catch and release” policy and allow illegal immigrant families to be housed in separate detainment facilities at the border, “Easy Rider” star Peter Fonda escalated the debate several levels by suggesting that a mob “rip Barron Trump from his mother’s arms and put him in a cage with pedophiles.”

Fonda later apologized for the rant.

However, at press time, his verified account @iamfonda was active and contained multiple instances of profanity directed at Trump and his supporters.

Trump-Choking-Hillary Poster Stirs Controversy in Political Race

0

‘This is juvenile and pretty un-classy, not to mention that it seems to promote violence against women…’

Cardboard Clinton Cutout Stirs Controversy in Boise Commish Race
IMAGE: Diana Lachiondo (screenshot) via Facebook

(Ben Sellers, Liberty Headlines) While Democrat strategists recently paid lip-service to a renewed focus on “pocketbook issues” leading up to November’s midterm election, it seems some local candidates haven’t gotten the memo.

For consistently red Idaho, Trump’s nine-point victory margin over Hillary Clinton in Ada County (which encompasses the state capital of Boise) during the 2016 race was considered by some to be a ‘win’ for Hillary.

It’s no surprise, then, that Diana Lachiondo, a Democratic candidate for commissioner, has been running a campaign that might appear to be to the right of some Republicans in other regions, on a platform that includes responsible growth, fighting cronyism and ending the addiction epidemic.

With her race against incumbent Republican commissioner Jim Tibbs heating up, though, Lachiondo veered leftward with a familiar tactic from her party’s playbook by throwing the gender card.

On Saturday, Lachiondo shared a photo to her campaign Facebook account of the GOP booth at the county fair, which featured a cardboard cutout of Trump putting Clinton into a headlock.

“This is juvenile and pretty un-classy, not to mention that it seems to promote violence against women,” Lachiondo wrote. “Like many people, I’m sick and tired of the vitriol being hurled out there.”

After being shared on a Reddit thread and spread by local activists and media, the post went viral (by Idaho standards), receiving more than 700 shares and 200 comments as of Monday.

Some followers took their campaign to the Ada County Republicans’ Facebook page, where they regurgitated the same attack of “violence against women.” The local GOP appeared to have removed the cutout in response.

Tibbs, a former Boise police chief, has held the district since 2013.

Although his campaign did not appear to have an active social media presence, his website lists public safety, transparency and fiscal responsibility as key platform components.

A training injury with the Idaho Guard in 1972 cost Tibbs his left arm, meaning he would struggle to put an able-bodied opponent of any gender into a full headlock.

Trump’s ALL-CAPS ‘Deepest Sympathies’ for McCains Not Good Enough for His Media Haters

0

‘I think this man could walk across the Hudson River and the New York Times would say Donald Trump can’t swim…’

(Ben Sellers, Liberty Headlines) If President Donald Trump’s motives in posting tributes to late Sen. John McCain, a former GOP political adversary, were to draw more press attacks on himself, he certainly succeeded.

Trump, like many others, honored McCain after his passing on Saturday with posts on Twitter and Instagram that offered his condolences:

However, echoing a recent statement Trump made honoring singer Aretha Franklin, media outlets like CNN wasted no time in turning a critique of the president’s tributes into the main story.

On his Instagram post, Trump used a template that he frequently uses on the picture-based platform, in which a statement in quotation marks is accompanied by a candid photo of himself.

As the statement was the exact same one issued on Trump’s go-to platform, Twitter, it seems unlikely that he personally oversaw the Instagram post.

Trump Fires Aide who Joked about John McCain Dying 1
John McCain (USA Today/Youtube)

Still, several media outlets were among the chorus of naysayers bashing him for including a photo of himself and not McCain, and “questioning the President’s motives for omitting the Senator,” according to CNN.

With a busy slate of developing global events to attend to—including those in North Korea, Syria and Mexico, plus the sideshow controversies of the Mueller investigation being ginned up by his domestic opponents—Trump probably put little thought at all into recognizing the mercurial McCain, who had referred to him as a “reality show facsimile” of a president and personally made sure to bar him from attending the funeral.

Out of respect for the Bush family, Trump previously skipped the funeral of Barbara Bush in April.

Trump’s predecessor, President Barack Obama, likewise drew criticism for snubbing the funerals of right-wing icons such as Nancy Reagan and Antonin Scalia.

In his 417 word tribute to Scalia (in which he also announced his intentions to replace the late Supreme Court justice), the notoriously solipsistic Obama logged nine instances of personal pronoun use (I, me, we) with little fanfare from the media.

Obama later went on to make crass jokes about replacing Scalia.

By contrast, Trump fired an aide who joked about the dying McCain, although the White House declined the media outcry to apologize for the remark.

Notwithstanding the defenses of Trump’s ‘motives’ or past precedent for holding back on McCain, the simple fact remains that it was a no-win situation for the president.

Were Trump suddenly to have jumped on the McCain bandwagon, as a disconcerting number of left-wingers did, he would, no doubt, have been accused of appropriating McCain’s image.

Borrowing a famous quotation from Lyndon Johnson about media spin and bias, in an interview with Bill O’Reilly on Fox News that aired a month before the inauguration, former Gov. Mike Huckabee rightly assessed the Trump paradox:

“I think this man could walk across the Hudson River and the New York Times would say Donald Trump can’t swim. That’s how bad it is.”

CEOs Gripe over Tighter Screening of Skilled Worker Visas

‘Revoking their U.S. work authorization will likely cause high-skilled immigrants to take their skills to competitors outside the United States…’

Apple's Tim Cook, President Donald Trump, Microsoft's Satya Nadella and Amazon's Jeff Bezos
Apple’s Tim Cook, President Donald Trump, Microsoft’s Satya Nadella and Amazon’s Jeff Bezos/IMAGE: WhiteHouse.gov via YouTube

(Ben Sellers, Liberty Headlines) Even as President Donald Trump’s economic policies have been a boon for corporate America (and Main Street America), some of the most ardent left-leaning company execs continue to pick nits and declare impending economic disaster.

Apple’s Tim Cook, Salesforce’s Marc Benioff, Pepsi’s Indra Nooyi and JP Morgan Chase’s Jamie Dimon were among the group of CEOs who co-signed a letter Wednesday as part of the Business Roundtable, criticizing the Trump administration’s immigration policy for its negative business impact.

The letter, addressed to Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen, complained that a shortage of permits for highly skilled workers, known as H-1B visas, was “causing considerable anxiety for many thousands of our employees while threatening to disrupt company operations.”

It is by no means the first time business leaders have cried foul over Trump’s immigration policies. Cook, for one, has made repeated appeals to the Trump White House to take a more ‘compassionate’ stance on issues like the Deferred Action on Childhood Arrivals and the so-called ‘Muslim ban’ restricting travel to and from certain terrorist safe-harbors.

While the brunt of Trump’s immigration reform has been aimed at unskilled labor entering the country illegally, he previously directed Cabinet members to explore H-1B solutions that would avoid displacing American workers.

Current law limits the H-1B program to 85,000 new visas annually. Even so, reported The Mercury News, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services director Francis Cissna has cited “all sorts of fraud and abuse” in the immigration systems.

As a result, Cissna has placed greater focus on extensive investigative interviews and frequent on-site visits to companies that employ H-1B workers.

Agency Mission No Longer to Serve 'Nation of Immigrants'
Francis Cissna/IMAGE: YouTube

The Business Roundtable said USCIS had “issued several policy memoranda over the past year… resulting in arbitrary and inconsistent adjudications.”

Among the issues with which the group took umbrage were inconsistent approval policies that resulted in greater uncertainty, the revocation of special eligibility status for the spouses of H-1B workers, and a more active removal process if workers are denied permit extensions or eligibility changes.

“The reality is that few will move their family and settle in a new country if, at any time and without notice, the government can force their immediate departure–often without explanation” the Business Roundtable letter said.

The CEOs also pointed to the current labor shortage, and said in many cases the Labor Department had certified that there are no qualified U.S. workers available to do the job.

“Other countries allow these valuable professionals to work, so revoking their U.S. work authorization will likely cause high-skilled immigrants to take their skills to competitors outside the United States,” the letter said.

Cissna, for his part, said USCIS was likely to get even more thorough in its screening and follow-ups moving forward.

Between student visas, skilled worker permits and extensions, “you could have a person here for a dozen years and we never talk to them,” he said. “I don’t think that’s prudent.”

Fauxcahontas Says ‘Real’ Immigration Problems are Child Separations, Not Mollie’s Murder

‘One of the things we have to remember here is we need an immigration system that is effective.’

(Ben Sellers, Liberty Headlines) A day after Mollie Tibbetts’ body was found in an Iowa cornfield and her alleged slayer, Mexican national Cristhian Bathena Rivera, indicted on murder charges, Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren called for immigration policy that “focuses on where real problems are.”

In an interview with CNN’s John Berman, Warren said, “I’m so sorry for the family here … but one of the things we have to remember here is we need an immigration system that is effective — that focuses on where real (emphasis Warren’s) problems are.”

Warren quickly pivoted to a discussion of a months-old Democratic talking point, criticizing the separation of children at the border from their parents.

“Last month, I went down to the border, and I saw where children had been taken away from their mothers … and there was no plan for how they would be reunified,” Warren said, ignoring the fact that Immigration and Customs Enforcement and the Border Patrol are capturing criminal and illegal aliens daily, both along the U.S. border and in cities and towns across the country.

Over a few days in June, President Donald Trump authorized border patrol agents to house children and parents illegally entering the U.S. in separate detention facilities at the border, to protect the children and make sure they weren’t being trafficked or otherwise taken advantage of.

Despite valid concerns that the existing “catch and release” policy allowed criminals to take advantage of a weak enforcement loophole by exploiting children, Trump caved to political pressure and rescinded his executive order.

Mollie Tibbetts
Mollie Tibbetts/IMAGE: FBI

Trump countered the rhetoric on the left by meeting with ‘Angel Families’ who had lost loved ones to illegal immigrants.

“These are the American citizens permanently separated from their loved ones,” Mr. Trump said at the June meeting. “These are the families the media ignores. These are the stories that Democrats and people that are weak on immigration don’t want to discuss.”

On Tuesday night, at a rally in West Virginia, Trump also weighed in on Tibbetts’ murder, saying it “should never have happened.”

“A vote for any Democrat in November is a vote to eliminate immigration enforcement” and allow “violent criminals to be all over our communities.”