LGBT Mafia Demands ‘Queer Theory’ Be Incorporated into Atomic Science

Molly Bruns
-
0
LGBT Mafia Demands ‘Queer Theory’ Be Incorporated into Atomic Science

(Molly Bruns, Headline USA) A nonprofit known as the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists recently released an article announcing the need to “queer nuclear weapons.”

According to the Post Millennial, the article, published on June 15, made the argument that LGBT inclusion could improve national security and “nuclear justice.”

Founded in 1945 as the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists of Chicago (BAC) by Manhattan Project scientists, the bulletin includes “top policymakers, researchers, and opinion makers from more than 150 countries,” and focuses on nuclear risk, climate change and disruptive technologies.

BAC published its “queer theory” article in recognition of “Pride” month, claiming that “equity and inclusion for queer people” was “essential for creating effective nuclear policy,” although there is no indication that the two are directly correlated from a scientific standpoint.

The bulletin suggested, however, that perhaps hosting a Drag Queen Story Hour could liven up their bunker and take the intensive focus off the mathematical calculations, vectors and formulas that too often occupy the thoughts of the average nuclear physicist.

“Nuclear facilities still have a reputation for being unwelcoming toward queer people and have failed to investigate allegations of homophobia and harassment,” the article said. “In part, this is due to the lack of diversity in the nuclear field.”

The article also claimed that queer participation “informs theories that aim to change how officials, experts and the public think about nuclear weapons.”

Allegedly, the inclusion of gay people into the nuclear disarmament process may allow the closed-minded scientists currently in the field to “reject binary choices and zero-sum thinking,” it said.

“Queer theory… identifies the assumptions and interests these ideas are built on—and imagines alternatives that serve a broader range of interests, including those of the invisible and resource-stripped,” the article said.

The article further stressed the urgency of the situation, insisting that “the time to do better is now.”

The scientists compared the situation to the anti-communist movement, the “Red Scare,” dubbing the alleged persecution of gay and lesbian employees the “Lavender Scare.”

BAC is also well known for maintaining its notorious Doomsday Clock, which it uses to fearmonger about the growing risk of a global armageddon while passive-aggressively offering woke commentary on global events with which it disapproves.

In January, the group put the clock at 90 seconds to midnight—the closest its ever been to nuclear catastrophe—after threats made by Russian President Vladimir Putin.

“Finding a path to serious peace negotiations could go a long way toward reducing the risk of escalation,” the scientists said. “In this time of unprecedented global danger, concerted action is required, and every second counts.”

Ga. Baseball Team Shamed by Woke Physicians for Glorifying Bacon

Corine Gatti
-
0
Ga. Baseball Team Shamed by Woke Physicians for Glorifying Bacon

(Corine Gatti, Headline USA) Macon Bacon, a beloved collegiate summer league baseball team based in Georgia, found itself facing an unexpected call to change its moniker after it was accused of glorifying bacon.

A high-profile billboard located on Interstate 16, sponsored by the Physicians Committee of Responsible Medicine, encouraged fans to “keep bacon off your plate.” The social-shaming scold group also sent a note to team president Brandon Raphael accusing the organization of “glorifying the meat,” Fox News Digital reported.

The letter highlighted the reported dangers of consuming processed meat, specifically the increased risk of developing colorectal cancer. Even a small amount of bacon per week can increase the likelihood of diagnosis by 18%, the physicians group said.

“Macon Bacon’s glorification of bacon, a processed meat that raises the risk of colorectal cancer and other diseases, sends the wrong message to fans,” the letter from nutrition education program manager Anna Herby, DHSc, RD, CDCES, to Raphael read.

The letter audaciously asked the team to change the name to Macon Facon Bacon and promote plant-based bacon alternatives, such as “Facon Bacon or Mushroom Bacon.” As for Kevin, Macon Bacon’s mascot, he can reveal that he is actually plant-based bacon,” the letter continued.

The letter instructed the organization to encourage fans to consume delicious, healthful plant-based foods instead of current menu items like “6 Degrees of Kevin Bacon, Bacon Wrapped Bacon, Steak Cut Bacon, Bacon Cheeseburger, Bacon Dog, Bacon Loaded Cheese Fries, Bacon Loaded Mac N Cheese and Bacon Chips,” the letter read.

Raphael responded to the letter in a statement to Macon, Ga.-based WGXA-TV.

He clarified that the organization is not a glorification of an unhealthy lifestyle but focused on bringing families and communities together in a “fun-natured way in Middle Georgia and beyond,” WGXA-TV reported.

“We take great pride in the Macon Bacon naming rights (which our fans named), as we get to witness the smiles and laughter from our fan base – who have supported our branding since our inception — that stems from the brand’s lighthearted and playful nature,” Raphael said.

“With that, the Macon Bacon will be sizzling forever and will not consider a name change,” he vowed. “Ever.”

Ex-FBI Analyst Goes to Prison for Having Classified Docs in Bathroom

Ken Silva
-
0
Ex-FBI Analyst Goes to Prison for Having Classified Docs in Bathroom

(Ken Silva, Headline USA) In a case many news outlets compared to the Donald Trump classified documents scandal, a former FBI analyst was sentenced to nearly four years imprisonment Wednesday for storing classified documents in her home—including her bathroom.

The former analyst pleaded guilty last October to two counts of violating the Espionage Act. The charges stem from her unlawfully taking about 386 classified documents to her home in Dodge City, Kansas.

“Kingsbury put national security at risk by retaining classified information in her home that would have, if in the wrong hands, revealed some of the government’s most important and secretive methods of collecting essential national security intelligence,” the Justice Department stated after Kingsbury was sentenced.

Before her sentencing, Kingsbury reportedly delivered an emotional statement that attacked the FBI and portrayed herself as the victim of a toxic work environment.

“I am guilty of being too honest without a safety net,” Kingsbury said, referring to the fact that she self-disclosed the classified documents in her home and asked for probation.

The FBI argued that Kingsbury only self-disclosed her possession of classified documents because she believed she was under FBI surveillance, according to the Kansas City Star. However, an FBI agent testified that Kingsbury wasn’t actually under FBI surveillance at the time.

Media outlets were quick to compare Kingsbury’s case to Trump’s.

“While Trump and his supporters have cast the case against him as a political witch hunt, Kingsbury’s case and others underscore how aggressively federal prosecutors take security issues related to classification and information security,” the Star reported.

The New York Times made a similar statement, reporting Wednesday that “her case and punishment, and others like it involving violations of the Espionage Act, reflect how seriously the government takes such charges and offers a glimpse of how aggressively the Justice Department might pursue its case against Mr. Trump.”

The outlets comparing the two cases didn’t mention the main defense being levied by Trump supporters—that, unlike the former FBI analyst, Trump was the President of the United States and therefore had authority to take any U.S. government document he pleased.

Ken Silva is a staff writer at Headline USA. Follow him at twitter.com/jd_cashless.

Report: Children of Illegals Flooding Public Schools, Impacting Education

Robert Jonathan
-
0
Report: Children of Illegals Flooding Public Schools, Impacting Education

(Robert Jonathan, Headline USA) A new report reveals that the Biden administration’s open-borders policy poses serious ramifications for America’s public schools when it comes to economics and assimilation.

According to data compiled by the Center for Immigration Studies, which is part derived from Census Bureau statistics, nearly 30% of public school enrollment (about 3 million students) from immigrant households are from homes headed by an illegal immigrant.

The nonpartisan research organization cautioned in the lengthy report that the estimates, much of which are based on circa 2021 information, could be even higher when factoring in the ongoing border crisis green-lit by the Biden regime.

Moreover, almost one-fourth of all U.S. public school students are from immigrant families of legal and illegal status, which number about 11 million, and about one-fifth of whom live in poverty.

Per the study published on Tuesday, “There are 55 public school students per 100 immigrant households, compared to 33 per hundred in households headed by the U.S.-born.”

The families are reportedly coalescing in impoverished areas, which brings limited resources into focus.

“Immigrants often settle in areas of high poverty, adding to the challenges for schools in these areas. In the 200 PUMAs with the highest poverty rates in the country, where poverty among students averages 41 percent, nearly 30 percent of students are from immigrant households,” CIS explained in its detailed analysis.

In government lingo, PUMAs are Public Use Microdata Areas, within which about seven high schools are located.

In nearly 300 of those PUMAs, 50% or more of the student population is from immigrant households.

Since state and local property and other taxes primarily fund the public schools in many jurisdictions, available funding from an eroded tax base is a conundrum.

“The lower income of immigrant households likely creates challenges for schools in some areas because tax contributions generally reflect income levels. As a result, immigration can cause a significant increase in enrollment without a corresponding increase in tax revenue,” CIS noted.

The analysis added that “Immigration may tend to strain the budgets of local schools because in addition to having more children in school on average, they are likely paying less in the state and local taxes that provide the vast majority of funding for schools.”

In the end, the middle-class taxpayer may wind up on the hook for the costs of Biden’s immigration surge.

The language barrier in the classroom is also an issue that could affect educational outcomes of all students. “[M]any local schools struggle to deal with a multiplicity of foreign languages, which likely creates significant additional challenges,” the study reported.

The influx of illegal aliens of all ages has strained social services to the consternation even of Democrat enclaves that touted themselves as sanctuary cities.

Democrat elites often use their wealth and connections to insulate themselves from polices that they have imposed on ordinary Americans, thus giving rise to the term limousine liberal (or champagne socialists in the U.K.).

They tend to send their own kids to private schools while residing in upscale neighborhoods with the requisite amenities.

The CIS report concluded that, given their “enormous share,” how immigrant children perform in school “is vitally important not only to them, but to our country’s future” and that “the fiscal and other challenges immigration creates for schools at the local level should at least be considered by policy-makers when setting immigration policy.”

The authors summarized that “Probably the most important issue when it comes to immigration is how many people should be allowed into the country. The impact on public schools would seem to be one of the most obvious areas where numbers matter.”

Woke Adjunct Who Failed Student for Using ‘Biological Women’ Plays Victim

Jacob Bruns
-
0
Woke Adjunct Who Failed Student for Using ‘Biological Women’ Plays Victim

(Jacob Bruns, Headline USA) A radical leftist adjunct professor at the University of Cincinnati’s Women’s, Gender and Sexuality Studies department confirmed that she gave a student a “zero” on a paper for using the term “biological women,” the Enquirer reported.

The student, Olivia Krolczyk, went viral in May after posting a series of TikTok videos, during which she publicly made her case but declined to identify the teacher in hopes that the situation might be resolved.

However, after being tracked down by reporters, Melanie Rose Nipper, the adjunct professor, stood firm in her  judgment that Krolczyk’s application of scientific terminology was a sort of hate speech.

Nipper affirmed her previous student’s account of the “sequence of events” but also noted that “her review of the [paper] idea and Krolczyk’s language was a routine element of her duties as a professor,” maintaining that she applied consistently similar policies throughout her grading practices.

“When a student uses ‘an outdated terminology,'” Nipper said it was “necessary to correct those mistakes.”

But she conceded that any students who chose to bend the knee to the woke speech police could be rewarded by having their papers regraded and, in Krolczyk’s case, had offered not to assess a late penalty.

She further clarified that the grade was “not a zero for the course—a zero for an assignment.”

According to the student, the professor noted the “exclusionary” and antiquated nature of the language she used in her project.

“This is a solid proposal,” the professor wrote. “However, the terms ‘biological women’ are exclusionary and are not allowed in this course as they further reinforce heteronormativity.”

The student complained that she had been graded not on the quality of her work, but based upon the fact that she failed to appease the partisan preferences of her professor.

“I 100% know that this is the most biased grade ever because my project is about transgenders competing in biological women’s sports,” the student said, questioning the viability of completing any project at all if such basic statements would be treated as untenable political positions.

“How am I supposed to do my final project if I can’t use the word ‘biological woman’, but that’s what my project is about?” she asked.

Nipper, however, said that she believes that classrooms should be places where students are punished for “intentionally or unintentionally, participating in a systemic harm of some kind.”

She also said that after seeing the TikTok video and the subsequent publicity, she felt victimized and began to cry.

“It’s a lot, right? It’s a lot to handle,” she told the Enquirer when interviewed.

According to the adjunct professor, it is important to be the gatekeeper of language.

“Not all students feel seen in academia. And that’s really the effort of WGSS (Women’s, Gender and Sexuality Studies) classes, to have your students feel seen, the marginalized ones in particular, and feel respected.”

Loudoun County School Officials Suffer Amnesia over Tranny Rape Incident

Jacob Bruns
-
0
Loudoun County School Officials Suffer Amnesia over Tranny Rape Incident

(Jacob Bruns, Headline USA) As they tried to fend of perjury charges in court, Loudoun County school officials feigned ignorance regarding a series of high-profile transgender rape incidents that happened in school bathrooms around 2021, the Daily Wire reported.

A trial on Tuesday focused specifically on the May 28, 2021, incident at Stone Bridge High School, during which a boy wearing a skirt allegedly raped a freshman girl in a bathroom.

According to top school officials, they could not remember any details of the situation.

The attorney for Wayde Byard, former Loudoun County Schools public information officer, for example, said that Byard had little or no knowledge of the alleged transgender bathroom rape, contradicting an earlier statement Byard made under oath.

And while Communications Director Joan Salgren, and Deputy Superintendent Ashley Ellis earlier admitted that Byard informed them of the rape later that day, they have since rescinded their initial statements, saying that they are not sure and have no clear recollection.

Ellis, who was the No. 2 official in the entire school system, admitted to “vaguely” recollecting the events of the day of the rape.

According to her testimony, she recalls some type of “situation,” despite having written personal notes about “anal penetration” and “police handling.”

appeared Tuesday that school administrators were conspiring to get Byard off the hook over statements he made before a grand jury suggesting he was unaware of the bathroom incident until much later.

Unfortunately for Byard, the evidence is stacked against him.

According to Principal Tim Flynn, he told Byard everything, and had informed every high-ranking official about the rape.

“We had a female student who alleged she was raped in the bathroom. … Wayde needs to know all the info so he can do his job,” Flynn testified.

Soon thereafter, he also forwarded county Superintendent Scott Ziegler an email containing a news story about the rape and the legal fallout, indicating a clear understanding of what had happened.

Jennifer Laffer, Byard’s defense attorney, said that Byard was only told about an angry parent, not about the rape itself.

Further, Byard previously said before a grand jury that he “acknowledges being told something about a boyfriend/girlfriend in a bathroom that ‘went sideways,'” but that he knew nothing about the sexual assault claims.

BlackRock, JPMorgan Hatch Banking Scheme to Rebuild Ukraine

Mark Pellin
-
0
BlackRock, JPMorgan Hatch Banking Scheme to Rebuild Ukraine

(Mark Pellin, Headline USA) A partnership between financial titan JPMorgan Chase and global deep state fixer BlackRock has reportedly been set in motion to create a “reconstruction bank” for Ukraine.

The two global conglomerates are in the planning stages of helping the Ukrainian government establish a “reconstruction bank to steer public seed capital into rebuilding projects that can attract hundreds of billions of dollars in private investment,” the Financial Times reported this week.

The so-called Ukraine Development Fund is not slated to kick into action until the end of the country’s ongoing war with Russia, but potential scheme investors are slated for a preview during a conference this week in London that’s being hosted by the British and Ukrainian governments.

BlackRock’s involvement with Ukraine came under heavy fire this week after an explosive report from O’Keefe Media Group.

“Ukraine is good for business. You know that, right?” BlackRock recruiter Serge Varlay boasted on video to an undercover reporter.

“Russia blows up Ukraine’s grain silos. The price of wheat’s gonna go mad up. So what are you gonna do if you’re a trading firm?” Varlay said. “The moment that news hits, within a millisecond, you’re going to pump trades into whoever the wheat suppliers are. Into their stocks. Within an hour or two that stick goes f*cking up and then you sell and you just make, I don’t know, however many mil.”

Varlay also described how easy it was for BlackRock to control world leaders by controlling the flow of money, investments and policy. When asked who was pulling the purse strings, Varlay replied “the hedge funds, BlackRock, the banks. These guys run the world.”

In an eerily prophetic pronouncement ahead of reports that BlackRock was partnering with JPMorgan to create the Ukrainian redevelopment banking scheme, Varlay explained how the global titans keep control of world affairs.

“You acquire stuff. You diversify, you acquire, you keep acquiring. You spend whatever you make in acquiring more,” the BlackRock recruiter said.

“And at a certain point, your risk level is super low. Imagine you’ve invested in 10 different industries, from food to drinks to technology,” he added. “If one of them fails it doesn’t matter, you have nine others to back you up.”

‘Little B***h’: MAGA’s 2 Leading Ladies Get Catty over Impeachment Articles

Mark Pellin
-
0
‘Little B***h’: MAGA’s 2 Leading Ladies Get Catty over Impeachment Articles

(Mark Pellin, Headline USA) For all their common traits, Reps. Lauren Boebert, R-Colo., and Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga.—both recent divorcees, second-term populist lawmakers and fearlessly devoted conservative females—seem to be developing an intra-party rivalry that came to a head during the motion Wednesday to censure Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif.

It ended with Greene calling Boebert a “little bitch” and Boebert walking away on the House floor saying “OK, Marjorie, we’re through,” the Daily Beast reported.

Despite the contentious intra-party ruckus over a push from Boebert for the U.S. House to impeach President Joe Biden, Republicans reportedly reached a compromise that keeps the issue alive while avoiding what critics called a premature move to force a vote.

Boebert’s “privileged motion”, which called for Biden’s impeachment over his disastrous and deadly mishandling of an illegal immigration crisis created by regime open border policies, circumvented normal party procedure and received stiff blowback from some Republicans.

At the same time, Greene, who had blasted Boebert’s impeachment move, on Wednesday indicated she was pursuing a similar fast-track vote to impeach embattled FBI Director Chris Wray.

In response to the tumult caused by Boebert’s motion and a potentially calamitous vote that could have seen enough Republican lawmakers side with Democrats to kill it, the House Rules Committee late Wednesday night crafted a legislative escape hatch, referring Boebert’s impeachment resolution to the House Homeland Security and Judiciary committees.

“Speaker McCarthy and House Republicans are committed to fulfilling regular order and undertaking investigations prior to taking up the serious constitutional duty of impeachment,” Rules Committee Chairman Tom Cole, R-Okla., said during the hearing.

The committee’s referral is slated for a floor vote on Thursday, House Majority Leader Steve Scalise, R-La., indicated. 

Speaker Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., who had actively encouraged GOP lawmakers to vote against the impeachment, huddled with Boebert prior to the rules committee hearing and gained her agreement to support the referral.

“I think it’s best for everybody,” McCarthy offered as explanation for sidetracking the impeachment resolution, according to NBC News.

Boebert reportedly agreed to support letting the process play out in committees, as long as the end result remained the same. 

“A sophomore in Congress just forced the House of Representatives to do their job,” Boebert said Wednesday. “I’m fine with the process taking place…if we send this to that committee, then yes, we are forcing the committee to do the work of impeaching Joe Biden.”

Boebert’s resolution to impeach Biden accused the embattled president of “using the powers of his high office” to have “knowingly presided over an executive branch that has continuously, overtly, and consistently violated Federal immigration law by pursuing an aggressive, open-borders agenda by purposefully and knowingly releasing more than 2,000,000 illegal aliens into the interior of the United States without the intention or ability to ensure that they appear in immigration court to face asylum or deportation proceedings.”

The resolution accused Biden of abandoning his duties and as a result, “President Biden has endangered the security of the United States and the health and safety of the American people. President Biden has caused a national security crisis and is endangering the lives of the American people.”

Greene, who has introduced multiple impeachment resolutions targeting Biden and several regime officials, but without the fast-track tactic used by Boebert, reportedly trashed her colleague from the House floor Wednesday. Greene accused Boebert of copying her previous impeachment resolutions, calling her “a little bitch” during a heated argument that played out in public.

“I’ve donated to you, I’ve defended you. But you’ve been nothing but a little bitch to me,” Greene reportedly told Boebert. “And you copied my articles of impeachment after I asked you to cosponsor them.”

The GOP spat, in addition to shuffling Boebert’s impeachment resolution to committees for further review and investigation, ironically appeared to prompt Greene into copying the copycat. She announced Wednesday night her plans to push for the impeachment of Biden’s FBI chief using the same type of privileged motion employed by Boebert.

“Wray is a bad cop hiding Joe Biden’s crimes and must be held accountable,” Greene wrote. “I won’t tolerate this level of disrespect and pure criminal corruption.”

“Christopher Wray spit in our faces and disrespected our Oversight Committee and our Chairman Comer by forcing us to see redacted versions of UNCLASSIFIED 1023 forms that gave proof of then VP Joe Biden taking a $5 million dollar bribe,” Greene wrote. “I’m turning my Articles of Impeachment on Wray into a privileged resolution.”

‘Spiteful Cowards’: Dems Throw Hissy Fit after Schiff Slapped w/ House Censure

Luis Cornelio
-
0
‘Spiteful Cowards’: Dems Throw Hissy Fit after Schiff Slapped w/ House Censure

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) Democrat lawmakers threw a temper tantrum against the historic Republican-led censorship bill holding far-left Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., accountable over his shameless involvement and countless lies in the Russian collusion conspiracy theory.

The Democrats, who had previously criticized the conduct of J6 protestors on the House floor, staged a rowdy protest challenging the legislation and disrupting Republican lawmakers.

The chaotic scene on the House floor was captured on video footage from C-SPAN, showing Democrat lawmakers chanting loudly and causing disorder. House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., called for order amidst reckless chants of “Shame! Shame! Shame!”

According to The Hill, former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., a staunch defender of Schiff, mandated her Democrat subordinates to continue their chants. Rep. Ilham Omar, D-Minn., a member of the Marxist-inspired Squad, referred to Republicans as “spiteful cowards” in support of the protest.

As the protest ensued, Democrats began chanting, “Adam! Adam! Adam!” in support of Schiff, who is running to become California senator. In response, Republicans criticized the Democrats’ use of taxpayer funds for what they view as frivolous investigations into former President Donald Trump.

Rep. Nicole Malliotakis, R-N.Y., highlighted the staggering amount of money wasted, admonishing the, “$32 million dollars on your charade.”

The initial version of the censorship bill, introduced by Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, R-Fla., included a stiff $16 million fine for Schiff, equivalent to the amount Democrats had spent on investigations.

However, Luna later amended the bill after objections were raised by 20 RINOs, citing concerns about its constitutionality.

Luna reintroduced the revised bill on Wednesday, expressing her satisfaction with the censorship efforts in an interview with Fox News.

“He is going to do down in history for exactly who he is, which is someone that tore apart our country, lied to the American people, exploited and abused his position of power and ultimately was responsible for one the biggest fraudulent investigations into any president in the history of the United States,” Luna said.

The passage of the historic bill came shortly after Schiff faced sharp criticism in the testimony of Special Counsel John Durham. Durham’s report rebuked the DOJ for launching a full-fledged investigation into false allegations of Trump colluding with Russia in the 2016 presidential election.

During the testimony, a video clip of Durham pushing back against Schiff’s questions went viral.

“The son of a presidential candidate gets calls all the time from a foreign government offering dirt on their opponent. Is that what you’re saying?” a heavily partisan Schiff asked of Durham. To which Durham responded, “I don’t think this is unique in your experience.”

Durham’s hilarious smackdown alluded to a prank call in 2018 where Russian comedians offered Schiff alleged dirt on Trump.

Distressed Pleas: Three Women Slashed in Random NYC Subway Attack

Luis Cornelio
-
0
Distressed Pleas: Three Women Slashed in Random NYC Subway Attack

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) Disturbing video footage has emerged from a New York City subway, depicting a female victim of a knife attack desperately pleading for help and urging fellow passengers to call 911, all while chasing her alleged assailant.

The harrowing video, obtained by the New York Post, showed a chaotic and violent scene inside a subway train. The unnamed 28-year-old victim, covered in blood, courageously pursued her attacker through the train’s doors.

Despite her cries for help, many hesitated to intervene before the unsettling video concluded. “Somebody call 911, somebody call 911,” the victim can be heard saying in the video. “Pull the emergency brake, pull the emergency brake.”

The New York City Police Department arraigned and charged 28-year-old Kemal Rideout with multiple counts of assault. The suspect was subsequently taken to a New York hospital for a psychiatric evaluation.

The brutal attack was one of three slashings, all involving three victims, that occurred within minutes of each other, according to ABC 7.

The victim featured in the video described the random attack to a local news outlet, stating, “I was on the train, texting my boyfriend, when some random guy walked past me and sliced me.” The female victim mentioned that she did not immediately feel the pain. “My body was in shock,” she added, before expressing her instinct to capture the alleged suspect on video.

The alleged assailant stabbed one of the victims so deeply that first responders had to employ a tourniquet to stop the bleeding, as reported by ABC 7.

This incident, which reignited discussions about lawlessness in New York, particularly within the subway system, follows another high-profile case involving the death of an unhinged homeless man.

Daniel Penny, a retired Marine hero, faced state charges brought by Alvin Bragg, the embattled Manhattan District Attorney, after Penny restrained Jordan Neely, an unhinged mentally ill homeless man who had threatened subway passengers and declared his fearlessness towards death or lifelong imprisonment if his demands were not met.

Similarly, Jordan Williams was reportedly called heroic by witnesses after he allegedly fatally stabbed a man who was lashing out in violence on a NYC subway.

Watch the harrowing video here.

1...1,9081,9091,910...3,888Page 1,909 of 3,888