HUYLER: Afraid of Imminent Economic Collapse? It’s Runaway Public Spending, ‘Stupid’

(Jerome Huyler, Headline USA contributor) American capitalism has had its ups and downs, as in the country’s long succession of boom-and-bust business cycles.

Periods of robust economic growth were interrupted by devastating financial panics that struck suddenly in 1792, 1819, 1837, 1857, 1873, 1893 and 2007. And then came the Great Depression of the 1930s, “stagflation” in the late-1970s, the savings-and-loan crisis of 1987, and a sub-prime housing meltdown that sparked a “Great Recession” by 2008.

Could the country be barreling headlong toward another severe crisis? Ominous signs suggest as much.

  1.  Developers have built super-size, urban and suburban office towers. Now, with so many working from home and so much unrented office space, could pending mortgage defaults precipitate a nation-wide banking crisis? The Federal Reserve will likely lend lending institutions billions more to avoid yet another nationwide bank run.
  2. History has a way of repeating itself. First, government undertakes a project of great “national importance,” then generous subsidies begin flowing to well-connected businesses. Completed in 1869, by 1873, the publicly-subsidized Union and Central Pacific railroads went bust. The bold adventure to bind the nation together precipitated a five-year depression that spread grievous hardship across the land. Shortly after opening its doors, thanks to a $500 million Congressional grant, the Obama-era Solyndra Corp filed for bankruptcy and closed its doors. How many publicly-subsidized ESG companies will survive, once they have to sink or swim on their own?
  3. The country’s already colossal, $31+ trillion accumulated public debt could, one day, make wary foreign governments and private investors reluctant to purchase additional Treasury bonds. Again, the Treasury will have to raise the interest rates to find buyers for its bonds and keep the government afloat. As interest rates rise, economic activity naturally falls.
  4. How long will it be before a crime-ravaged, deep-blue city or county is caught between a fleeing middle-class tax base and its “need” to feed, clothe, educate, house and heal an ever-expanding out-of-work/immigrant population? What will become of all other municipal bond offerings once that city or county defaults on its debt obligations.

What if we could act today to avoid the hardship and suffering tomorrow may bring? What reforms should we seriously ponder?

Loud voices call for steep tax cuts. They correctly point out that the JFK, Reagan and Trump tax cuts stimulated economic activity and produced more, not less, tax revenue.

Nevertheless—BAT or VAT, FAIR or FLAT—tax reform won’t fix a thing. There’s no safe way to pay for a runaway welfare state and the level of public spending it demands. Every penny a government spends has to be financed.

As public programs multiply and expand, more and more revenue is needed. But rather than imposing a crushing tax burden on their constituents, politicians prefer to pass that burden onto future generations. So the country goes ever deeper into debt.

The money borrowed is not available for new commercial or industrial projects. The huge sums government “invests” in the market also distort the pace and direction of capital investment. The annual interest payments governments must make (now in excess of $400 billion) take more money out of productive circulation.

Then shouldn’t we press for immediate, “across-the-board” budget cuts? No, we shouldn’t. Not every service governments perform is essential. Some are, many aren’t. It will do no good to throw the baby out with the bathwater.

The real question that demands our attention is where can public spending be substantially cut? What programs can be downsized or eliminated, and what agencies, bureaus and Cabinet departments can be closed?

The hot headlines of the day aside, these are the vital questions Americans need to ponder. But the deepest question is this: What must government do for us and what must we be allowed and expected to do for ourselves—and our neighbors in need?

Indeed, how limited was limited government originally meant to be? And there is no time to dawdle, for as Gerald Ford advised back in 1976: A government that is big enough to give you anything you want, is big enough to take everything you have.

Jerome Huyler is a former assistant professor (Seton Hall University) with a PhD. in political science, and the author of Locke in America: The Moral Philosophy of the Founding Era. He lives in Brooklyn, N.Y.

Fulton County’s Publication of Indictment Before Vote Opens Avenue for Dismissal

(Headline USA) Hours before a Georgia grand jury handed down an indictment charging Donald Trump and 18 allies over efforts to overturn his 2020 election loss late Monday, a mysterious document posted on the court’s website erroneously suggested the former president had already been charged before the file was quickly deleted.

The posting of the case before grand jurors voted on the indictment—and officials’ failure to explain what happened—gave the former president yet another opening in court and on the campaign trial to paint Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis’s case as tainted and the criminal justice system as rigged against him.

Already, it follows several other alarming questions about Willis’s own motives and those of others attached to the case.

The George Soros-backed DA, who was elected in 2020, campaigned on a platform of indicting the then-president. Willis then used as the basis for her investigation a phone call Trump made to Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger a day after she, herself, took office.

She was forced to drop part of the probe after accusations of ethical violations that included campaigning with the opponent of one of the state officials she potentially hoped to implicate in her wide-reaching indictment.

And in February, a previous grand-jury foreman raised questions about the integrity of the probe by conducting a series of unhinged interviews with national media in which she made clear her personal biases and those of the jury.

Following the most recent scandal surrounding the leaked indictment, the Fulton County Clerk Che Alexander did little to tamp down speculation, refusing to say how the erroneous filing got online or publicly rule out whether it could have been the result of a hack.

“Trump’s lawyers will try to jump on it, as they jump on every possible avenue of defense, and argue that someone leaked it just to embarrass him,” said Jeffrey Jacobovitz, a Washington criminal defense attorney, attempting to cast the corrupt prosecution as the victims for posting a predetermined indictment.

The confusion over the document thrust the newly sworn in Fulton County courts clerk into the spotlight as reporters descended onto the Atlanta courthouse to get a glimpse at the witnesses called in to testify before the grand jury hearing Willis’s sprawling case.

Hours later, cameras followed as the clerk, Che Alexander, handed a stack of indictments— which included the 2020 election case—to Superior Court Judge Robert McBurney.

Shortly after Reuters reported Monday afternoon that the erroneous filing was posted online, Alexander’s office released a statement calling the document “fictitious,” and claimed documents without official case numbers “are not considered official filings and should not be treated as such.”

But the document that appeared online did have a case number—though it differed from the one ultimately listed on the indictment later handed down.

Asked late Monday specifically about the document, Willis said, “I can’t tell you anything about what you refer to.”

The filing posted earlier Monday listed 13 counts against Trump, including Georgia’s Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations, or RICO, solicitation of violation of oath by public officer and false statements and writings. The final charges, unsealed hours later, against Trump were identical.

The indictment, however, includes charges against not only Trump, but a slew of allies—including attorneys John Eastman and Rudy Giuliani.

It’s the fourth criminal case against the Republican former president, who has characterized all the cases against him as a bid to hurt his 2024 bid to return to the White House.

Trump legal team has already suggested it would allege prosecutorial misconduct.

“This was not a simple administrative mistake,” but is “emblematic of the pervasive and glaring constitutional violations which have plagued this case from its very inception,” lawyers Drew Findling, Jennifer Little and Marissa Goldberg said in a statement after the indictment was released.

“The events that have unfolded today have been shocking and absurd, starting with the leak of a presumed and premature indictment before the witnesses had testified or the grand jurors had deliberated and ending with the District Attorney being unable to offer any explanation,” they added. “In light of this major fumble, the Fulton County District Attorney’s Office clearly decided to force through and rush this 98-page indictment.”

Trump himself quickly capitalized on the scandal, writing in an email before the indictment came down: “The Grand Jury testimony has not even FINISHED – but it’s clear the District Attorney has already decided how this case will end.”

Legal experts said the filing was likely a list of potential charges prosecutors were presenting to the grand jury ahead of Monday’s vote that somehow was accidently uploaded on the court’s website.

“The grand jury doesn’t sit around and write indictments, it’s presented to them,” said Clark Cunningham, a Georgia State University law professor. “Presumably before this morning, they had drafted an indictment—there’s nothing wrong with that.”

And experts said that while Trump may use the apparent mistake in an effort to undermine the integrity of Willis’s investigation on the campaign trail, it’s unlikely to ultimately have an impact in the courtroom.

“Unfortunately errors happen in today’s world with things being done online,” said Stanley Twardy, Jr., a former U.S. attorney for Connecticut. “I don’t think this is something that is going to create issues.”

Jacobovitz agreed, adding: “I do not think any argument related to that will be meritorious.”

Prosecutors draft indictments and present them to the grand jury, which meets in secret and ultimately decides whether to hand charges down. Grand juries—made up of people randomly drawn from the community, like juries that decide trials—are designed to safeguard against politically motivated prosecutions, but they’ve long been criticized by some as little more than a rubber stamp for prosecutors.

Alexander was sworn in as the courts clerk less than two months ago to replace Tina Robinson, who retired in June after 16 years in the role. Alexander appears to have previously campaigned for Willis in her bid for a judgeship in 2018.

Her Instagram page includes multiple photos of Willis and her campaign posters, including one with a caption that said Willis “has truly been an inspiration to me and countless others” and included #realfriends.

Pressed about the document before the indictment was handed down, Alexander said: “I mean, I don’t know what else to say.”

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

Hunter Biden’s Attorney Jumps Ship in Wake of Collapsed Plea Deal

(Ken Silva, Headline USA) Criminal defense attorney Christopher Clark filed a motion Tuesday to withdraw from being Hunter Biden’s lawyer, telling a federal judge that he can no longer be counsel since he was a witness to the negotiation of the now-defunct plea deal for the president’s son.

Clark’s motion came after the Justice Department said last week that the plea deal was dead. District Judge Maryellen Noreika had given the parties 30 days to explain to her why she should accept the plea deal when she initially rejected it at a July 26 hearing, but the DOJ said last week that the negotiations reached an “impasse.”

Given these recent developments, Clark said it’s best if he’s no longer Hunter’s lawyer.

“It appears that the negotiation and drafting of the plea agreement and diversion agreement will be contested, and Mr. Clark is a percipient witness to those issues. Under the ‘witness-advocate’ rule, it is inadvisable for Mr. Clark to continue as counsel in this case,” Clark’s Tuesday motion said.

“Withdrawal will not cause a substantial hardship to Mr. Biden because counsel from the other firms that have entered an appearance will continue to represent Mr. Biden in this matter,” the motion added.

One of the more controversial aspects the Biden-DOJ deal was a provision that would prohibit the DOJ from charging Biden for breaching the agreement unless the judge allowed prosecutors to do so.

“[The deal] makes me a gatekeeper to criminal charges and puts me in the middle of a decision as to whether to bring a charge,” Judge Noreika said at the hearing where she rejected the deal.

Another troubling aspect of the deal is that the parties couldn’t agree whether it gives Hunter immunity from other crimes, such as his failure to register as a foreign agent when he was lobbying on behalf of foreign companies like Ukrainian energy giant Burisma.

Criticizing it as a “sweetheart” deal, House Republicans are also looking to examine the details of the negotiations between the DOJ and the president’s son. Reps. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, James Comer, R-Ky., and Jason Smith, R-Mo., announced on July 31 that they’re opening an investigation into the matter.

“The Department’s unusual plea and pretrial diversion agreements with Mr. Biden raise serious concerns—especially when combined with recent whistleblower allegations—that the Department has provided preferential treatment toward Mr. Biden in the course of its investigation and proposed resolution of his alleged criminal conduct,” they said in a letter to Attorney General Merrick Garland.

Garland responded by giving “special counsel” status to the prosecutor overseeing the Hunter Biden investigation, U.S. Attorney David Weiss. Critics said Garland’s move was designed to prevent Weiss from testifying to Congress.

The judge has yet to rule on Clark’s motion to withdraw as Hunter’s attorney.

Ken Silva is a staff writer at Headline USA. Follow him at twitter.com/jd_cashless.

Karine Jean Pierre Appears to Have No Clue Who Sen. Mazie Hirono Is

(Jacob Bruns, Headline USA) As forest fires continue to rage on Hawaii’s island of Maui, President Joe Biden has been lambasted for his lack of concern regarding the unmitigated disaster.

It now seems that White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre shares that lack of concern, as she just recently excused Biden from needing to visit the site of the disaster while proceeding to misgender and misname Hawaii’s two United States senators.

First, Jean-Pierre called Hawaii Sen. Mazie Hirono, “Horino,” and then proceeded to call Hirono a “he” when Hirono is a woman.

The press secretary began her answer by alluding to a certain “Senator Horino” when asked about the federal bureaucracy’s response to the fires.

“He thanked the president for the immediate support the federal agencies have delivered to the residents of Hawaii,” she added, still referring to Mazie Hirono.

Jean-Pierre also seemed to have encountered the name of Hawaii’s Senator Brian Schatz for the first time, mispronouncing his name several times before approximating it.

“And does, so has. . . so has, uh, Senator Shortz–Schwatz–Shartz–Shatz,” she stuttered, coming closest to a proper pronunciation on her fourth try.

Jean-Pierre was grilled on X, formerly Twitter, for her lack of basic research.

“Affirmative Action for ya,” one commentator wrote, alluding to the fact that Jean-Pierre was explicitly given the job because she is a lesbian of color. Another noted that if he performed as poorly as Jean-Pierre at his job, he wouldn’t be paid any longer.

“Hey @POTUS while I’m sure she’s a decent person, KJP is in way over her head as the WH press secretary,” chided another commentator. “Today, she mispronounced the names of both Hawaii US senators and referred to Senator Hirono as a he. It’s more than a little embarrassing tbh.

The lackluster response to the crisis from the White House, however, appears to be a top-down phenomenon. President Biden himself was asked about the disaster, and replied that he had “no comment.” As the state burned, Biden continued his Delaware beach vacation.

Plea Deal Possible for NYC Prof. Who Threatened Journalist w/ Machete

(Jacob Bruns, Headline USA) A former adjunct college professor in New York City who threatened a reporter by holding a large machete to his neck may be getting a plea deal, the New York Post reported.

Bronx Criminal Court Judge Matthew Bondy suggested that there may be a “possible disposition” in the case, despite the fact that Shellyne Rodriguez has been charged with harassment and menacing.

The judge also set a court date for the “possible disposition” on Oct. 2.

Bondy noted that he had received a letter from Bronx Community Solutions, a program that offers “jail alternatives” to criminal defendants.

The “alternatives” include counseling and community service.

Meanwhile, the Bronx District Attorney’s Office said it had neither “determined nor communicated a plea offer yet” to Rodriguez and her lawyer.

“We are reviewing information sent by defense counsel, continuing our investigation, and keeping the victim apprised of any developments,” a DA spokesperson told the press.

The craziness began in May, when Rodriguez, an adjunct art professor at Hunter College, screamed at pro-life students and attacked their display table.

“You’re not educating s**t,” she yelled at the hapless and stunned subordinates exercising their free-speech rights.

“This is f***ing propaganda,” she continued. “What are you going to do, like anti-trans next?”

When a reporter from the New York Post tried to inquire with Rodriguez about her actions, she proceeded to hold a machete to his throat, telling him to “get the f*** away from more door, or I’m gonna chop you up with this machete!”

Rodriguez was subsequently fired after Hunter College officials reviewed the footage of the on-campus episode.

However, she insisted that she was the victim because the students robbed her of her “sense of safety.”

She claimed that students “manipulated” the video of the incident in order to mobilize “their members and supporters to attack me.”

She also cited her “fear that they would show up at my home to cause me physical harm, as has happened with so many other women who have similarly had their personal info exposed as a form of politically motivated harassment.”

Rodriguez’s lawyer will likely advance the same argument in court.

Texas Gov. Offers Perfect Response to Aussie Tourist’s Dig at U.S. Patriotism

(Corine Gatti, Headline USA) Texas Republican Gov. Greg Abbott blasted Australian TikToker Mia Chloe for complaining that there were too many American flags in the United States during her recent travels.

“I’m just going to say it. There are too many American flags. They’re on houses. They’re on cars. Some are on couch cushions,” whined a frustrated Chloe, who went by the username @meanderwithmia on the platform. “You’re the only country that I know that does this.” 

Moreover, she urged Americans to scale back on their patriotism. “Let’s pull back on it, OK. Let’s stay humble,” she instructed. But she was anything but humble in her posts criticizing America’s patriotism.

Chloe has only seen an Australian flag on the notable Sydney Harbour Bridge and admitted she didn’t remember what her country’s flag looked like, Fox News Digital reported.

“I know it’s blue and it’s got some stars on it but I think I could draw the American flag from memory. I think I could make a bloody sculpture out of it.”

Chloe’s social media focused on “traveling on a budget” with “no brain cells,” according to the page account, and was chastised by Abbott with four words on X, formerly Twitter.

“Go back to Australia,” Abbott replied to the video tirade, posting eight American flag emojis.

Chloe then felt the sting of American patriotism after criticizing Old Glory and deactivated her TikTok account.

“You’re a guest, be nice,” said one North American man. “Wait till she visits Texas and sees all our flags,” quipped another. While another suggested, “get lost, lady”.

“Too much America in America. I don’t get it,” one user commented, mocking the Aussie.

Even fellow Aussies were embarrassed by her remarks. “As an Aussie who just spent two weeks in Texas, I found the presence of the flags inspiring. I wish we had that kind of patriotism back home,” commented @AussieOverLawd.

This was not the first time the tourist didn’t like a piece of Americana.

Chloe voiced her displeasure with American supermarkets and called them “a trap” in a now-deleted video uploaded on Aug. 4, Fox News Digitial noted, after spending four hours in a Walmart but only purchasing three items. She also apologized for calling Kansas “unlivable” due to the harsh weather. 

Conservative ESPN Anchor Quits to ‘Exercise My Free-Speech Rights’

(Robert Jonathan, Headline USA) ESPN anchor Sage Steele announced Tuesday that she is making a career change after reaching a settlement in her lawsuit against the sports network and its parent company, Disney.

In what she labeled as a life update, Steele, 50, explained the following on X (formerly known as Twitter).

“Having successfully settled my case with ESPN/Disney, I have decided to leave so I can exercise my First Amendment rights more freely. I am grateful for so many wonderful experiences over the past 16 years and am excited for my next chapter!”

In a statement, ESPN confirmed that “ESPN and Sage Steele have mutually agreed to part ways. We thank her for her many contributions over the years.”

Steele continued to co-host SportsCenter while her lawsuit against ESPN was pending. Steele sued ESPN in April 2022 for allegedly violating her free-speech rights after she publicly spoke against Disney’s COVID-19 employee vaccine mandate.

The broadcaster—one of the very few ESPN personalities who seldom went along with the far-left, social justice narrative that has politicized the channel—had previously turned down a $500,000 settlement offer.

Out-of-court settlements of this nature are usually kept confidential, unless the details leak out or are otherwise revealed. The terms often include a non-disparagement binder, so it remains to been seen as to the degree to which Steele can indeed talk openly about the ESPN drama.

Steele, who reluctantly complied with the corporate jab edict, allegedly was suspended from her job after telling former NFL QB Jay Cutler on his podcast that the policy, rather than allowing people to make their own individual healthcare decisions, was “scary” and “sick.”

During the same interview, Steele—who is biracial—made some controversial remarks about how Barack Obama identifies himself, which apparently also displeased corporate execs.

The case, in which she accused ESPN other transgressions including breach of contract, was scheduled for trial in March 2024.

Steele may have had the upper hand in the litigation because a law on the books in Connecticut, the home of ESPN headquarters and where the case was filed, protects employees from any workplace disciplinary action for exercising their free-speech rights under the U.S. or state constitution.

ESPN’s internal political spats have been simmering within the company for years.

Back in 2016, ESPN’s public editor (a position later abolished) diplomatically wrote: “Internally, there’s a feeling among many staffers—both liberal and conservative—that the company’s perceived move leftward has had a stifling effect on discourse inside the company and has affected its public-facing products. Consumers have sensed that same leftward movement, alienating some.”

The-then editor, Jim Brady, quoted an unnamed conservative employee who said, “If you’re a Republican or conservative, you feel the need to talk in whispers.”

Parenthetically, even despite her liberal bona fides, NBA specialist Rachel Nichols—another 16-year employee—found herself sidelined, which ultimately culminated in a January 2022 exit agreement, after getting caught on a hot mic complaining about the company’s diversity protocols.

Workers at SF’s Pelosi Federal Building Urged to Go Remote amid Crime Wave

(Molly Bruns, Headline USA) Federal workers based in San Francisco received orders to work from home for the foreseeable future due to incidents near their office building.

Hundreds of employees in the Department of Health and Human Services who previously worked in the Speaker Nancy Pelosi Federal Building took the directive to work remotely if possible, according to the Daily Wire.

“In light of the conditions at the [federal building] we recommend employees … maximize the use of telework for the foreseeable future,” Cheryl Campbell, HHS assistant secretary for administration, wrote in a memo to employees.

“This recommendation should be extended to all Region IX employees, including those not currently utilizing telework flexibilities,” she added.

“Region IX employees” include HHS workers in California, Arizona and Nevada.

The building hosted several federal agencies, including HHS, the Labor Department, the Transportation Department and an office for Rep. Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., herself.

Outside of the building, drug dealers did gangbusters business. Addicts use the building’s concrete benches to partake in their newly purchased wares.

Several violent crimes and open drug deals took place in the building’s immediate vicinity, including a drug deal linked to a previous shooting, according to a statement from the regional District Attorney’s Office.

Over the past few years, since leftists have embraced radical social justice policies in lieu of law and order, murders in the city rose 20%; robberies and car thefts rose 14% and 13%, respectively.

Homelessness and drug abuse were also persistent problems, despite deaths from drug overdoses falling from their record highs in 2020.

In 2022, 620 fatal drug overdoses were reported.

An estimated 38,000 people within the city are homeless, up 35% since 2019.

Pelosi’s office recently made a statement concerning the safety of those working in the office building.

“Federal, state and local law enforcement—in coordination with public health officials and stakeholders—are working hard to address the acute crises of fentanyl trafficking and related violence in certain areas of the city,” the Pelosi spokesman said.

Rep. Kevin Kiley, R-Calif., reacted to the memo in a tweet.

“If California offers a preview of where our country is headed, San Francisco offers an even starker warning,” Kiley said. “This is where failed policies, radical politics, and public corruption are in their most advanced stage—and where residents are most rapidly fleeing.”

Hochul Humiliated as Biden Admin Rejects Bid to Move Illegals to Military Site

(Jacob Bruns, Headline USA) The Biden administration blocked the approval of a proposed military site in New York City to accommodate illegal immigrants, despite Gov. Kathy Hochul’s personal pitch, the New York Post reported.

With New York City Mayor Eric Adams having recently announced that the Big Apple had hit its limit on immigration from the southern border, Hochul and company hoped to house the still burgeoning number of illegals at a 1,000-acre former military site, Floyd Bennett Airfield.

But the Biden administration’s refusal to sign off on the NYC military site for migrants has left Hochul in a delicate situation.

“Getting the federal government to change its position and tell an agency, the Department of the Interior, that they now have to accept migrants has been a complicated journey,” she told reporters after celebrating Manhattan’s Dominican Day Parade.

According to the governor, the feds did not absolutely disapprove, but rather demanded a more thorough plan.

“Today was a call to talk about logistics, any kind of legal barriers, any other obstacles,” she claimed.

“But I did not take away from that a hard ‘no,’” she continued. “So I think it’s just gonna be an evolving process.”

The city has looked into other options for housing illegals—including the Staten Island-based Fort Wadsworth, which city, state and federal officials toured last week.

The city, however, already has four immigration housing centers, one of which holds up to 2,000 people. According to Hochul’s office, the shelters cost the city $20 million every month.

The crisis, caused by President Joe Biden’s open-border policies, has been of particular concern for Adams, who previously suggested housing homeless illegal immigrants in “spare rooms” and drew backlash for shipping them out of New York City to its neighboring suburbs.

Chicago Group Begs Gangs to Impose Curfew on Shooting People

(Molly Bruns, Headline USA) An activist group in Chicago’s Rogers Park neighborhood requested local gangs put time constraints on shootings so citizens do not have to live in fear as they go about their daily lives.

Native Sons proposed what they called “The People’s Ordinance,” pleading with gangs to hold daily cease fires from 9 a.m. to 9 p.m., according to Breitbart.

“Under this ordinance, we ask that people stop associating with and glorifying ‘shooters,’ stop glorifying ‘switches,’ and stop wearing those ski masks everywhere which perpetuates you as some ‘opp,'” said Native Sons co-founder Tatiana Atkins. “When those who live a certain lifestyle try to hang with ‘regular’ class citizens, they put everyone at risk.”

Atkins expressed the desperation of the situation, begging gang members to hold their feuds until the evening and promised parents would have their kids inside as 9 p.m. approached.

“At the end of the day, 5-year-olds are being killed by gun violence, 14-year-olds are being killed by gun violence, 78-year-olds are being killed by gun violence, pregnant women are being killed by gun violence, young boys with bright futures are being killed by gun violence, fathers are being killed by gun violence, and this shouldn’t be happening,” she said.

According to its social media, Native Sons is a grassroots group that emerged as a positive and pro-active way for members of the black community to take matters affecting their neighborhoods, such as crime and drug abuse, into their own hands.

While the group uses Native American imagery, and mentions “indigenous” people and “holistic” healing in its literature, its eponymous name may be partially inspired from Richard Wright’s 1940 bestseller about a 20-year-old black man in Chicago’s South Side whose oppressive social circumstances result in him accidentally murdering the daughter of his white employer.

Chicago had 23 shootings take place last weekend, three of them resulting in death.

The city has seen over 370 deaths so far in 2023.

Violence in the city rose under the tenure of former Mayor Lori Lightfoot.

Current mayor Brandon Johnson has done little to help the desperate situation—allying himself with radical pro-crime groups such as Black Lives Matter and pushing to defund the city’s police.

As an alternative to traditional policing, Johnson said he hopes to implement mental-healthcare programming, violence-prevention programs and greater police accountability.

Another citizen group implemented a text-alert system in order to send out warnings concerning impending “teen takeovers,” like the massive riot that took place in April.