Monday, April 21, 2025

SCOTUS Allows Trump to Take 16,000 Workers off Federal Payroll

(Dan McCaleb, The Center Square) The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday ruled that the Trump administration can keep thousands of probationary workers off of the federal payroll as lawsuits challenging the administration’s plan to fire them play out in court.

In an unsigned, two-page decision, the Supreme Court stayed a preliminary injunction placed on the administration’s attempt to remove about 16,000 probationary employees from the payroll. Several unions had filed suit arguing the terminations are illegal, but the Supreme Court said the unions didn’t have standing in the case.

“The District Court’s injunction was based solely on the allegations of the nine non-profit-organization plaintiffs in this case. But under established law, those allegations are presently insufficient to support the organizations’ standing,” the Supreme Court wrote. “This order does not address the claims of the other plaintiffs, which did not form the basis of the District Court’s preliminary injunction.”

The U.S. District Court of the Northern District of California put the preliminary injunction in place, and the Trump administration appealed directly to the U.S. Supreme Court.

The ruling notes that Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson would have declined to hear the administration’s emergency appeal.

The ruling is not final. It effectively means that the administration can keep the workers off the payroll as lower courts determine whether the plan to terminate them is legal. Similar challenges, and injunctions, remain in place in federal courts in Maryland and elsewhere.

Trump and Netanyahu Reaffirm Their Vision for the Ethnic Cleansing of Gaza

(Dave DeCamp, Antiwar.com) President Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu met at the White House on Monday and reaffirmed their desire for the ethnic cleansing of Gaza, both claiming that there are other countries willing to take in the Palestinian population.

Trump also said it would be a “good thing” for the US to take over and control Gaza. “Well, you know how I feel about the Gaza Strip. I think it’s an incredible piece of important real estate,” he told reporters at the Oval Office. “I think it’s something we would be involved in, you know, having a peace force like the United States there, controlling and owning the Gaza Strip, would be a good thing.”

The president said that if the Palestinians are “moved around to different countries,” it would create a “freedom zone” in Gaza. “You call it the freedom zone, a free zone, a zone where people aren’t going to be killed every day,” he said.

Netanyahu departs the White House after meeting Trump on April 7, 2025 (Photo by Allison Bailey/NurPhoto via Reuters Connect)

Netanyahu framed the idea of expelling Palestinians from Gaza as voluntary. “We’re committed to getting all the hostages out, but also eliminating the evil tyranny of Hamas in Gaza and enabling the people of Gaza to freely make a choice to go wherever they want,” he said.

Netanyahu said that he and President Trump discussed countries that are willing to take in Palestinians from Gaza, but he didn’t mention any by name. “I think this is the right thing to do. It’s going to take years to rebuild Gaza; in the meantime, people can have an option. The president has a vision. Countries are responding to that vision, and we’re working on it,” he said.

Netanyahu’s visit to the US came amid Israel’s constant attacks on the Gaza Strip, which have killed more than 1,300 Palestinians since the resumption of the genocidal war on March 18. Since March 2, Israel has imposed a total blockade on Gaza, cutting off the entry of humanitarian aid and all other goods.

The Israeli military has also expanded its ground assault and is seizing more land in Gaza as part of Netanyahu’s plans for a full Israeli military occupation. The IDF now controls more than 50% of Gaza’s territory.

President Trump has fully supported the Israeli escalations in Gaza and claimed on Monday that Netanyahu was working to free the Israeli hostages despite his refusal to fully implement the ceasefire deal signed in January that would have achieved that goal. Israel has also rejected Hamas’s offer to release all the Israeli captives at once in exchange for a permanent truce.

This article originally appeared at Antiwar.com.

Hegseth Says Pentagon Will Get Its First $1 Trillion Budget

(Dave DeCamp, Antiwar.com) Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth said Monday that the Pentagon will soon have its first $1 trillion budget despite the Trump administration’s pledges to cut government spending.

Hegseth made the announcement on X while sharing a video of President Trump saying that his administration approved a plan for a $1 trillion military budget. “Nobody’s seen anything like it. We have to build out military, and we’re very cost-conscious, but the military is something we have to build, and we have to be strong,” he said while hosting Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

Trump said he was “proud to say” it will be the biggest military budget “we’ve ever done.”

Hegseth wrote on X, “Thank you Mr. President! COMING SOON: the first TRILLION dollar [Defense Department] budget.”

Hegseth said the Pentagon would “spend every taxpayer dollar wisely,” but he is currently overseeing a massive bombing campaign in Yemen that’s failed to achieve its stated goal of stopping Houthi attacks and will soon cost over $1 billion in just a month of operations.

While the Pentagon has never had a $1 trillion budget, the actual cost of total US military spending has exceeded $1 trillion for years.

The 2025 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which President Biden signed into law in December 2023, totaled $895 billion. According to veteran defense analyst Winslow Wheeler, based on the $895 billion NDAA, US national security spending for 2025 is expected to reach about $1.77 trillion.

Wheeler’s estimate accounts for military-related spending from other government agencies not funded by the NDAA, such as the Department of Veteran Affairs and Homeland Security. It also includes the national security share of the interest accrued on the US debt and other factors.

Trump and Hegseth’s comments suggest the president will request a $1 trillion NDAA for 2026, which would really bring total US military spending close to $2 trillion.

This article originally appeared at Antiwar.com.

2024 Loser Tim Walz Fumbles Disastrous CNN Interview: ‘The Country Rejected It’

(Luis CornelioHeadline USA) Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz—a Democrat and a failed contender on the 2024 presidential ticket—made a fool of himself during a shockingly hard-hitting interview with CNN’s Jake Tapper on Sunday.

Tapper seemingly tried to distance himself from the leftist label that Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins recently pinned on him. He pressed Walz over his blatant attempt to whitewash the Biden administration’s failures, including the former President Joe Biden’s well-documented cognitive decline. 

Walz stumbled repeatedly through his responses. 

Tapper asked, “What do you make of the criticism that one of the reasons why your party was so resoundingly rejected last November, Democrats were gaslighting the country, saying that inflation was not a big deal, heralding Bidenomics, not only Biden but Kamala Harris was heralding Bidenomics.” 

Among other examples of gaslighting were “pretending that there wasn’t a problem at the border” and asserting that “Biden was up for another 4 years for the job,” Tapper said. 

“Your party stood against all of those things,” he pressed. 

Walz, clearly unprepared for the questions, subsequently fumbled in response.  

He praised Biden for his work in fighting the COVID-19 pandemic before saying that Tapper’s question was “spot on.” 

“Don’t talk about food insecurity—talk about people being hungry. Your question is spot on. We got intellectualized on this,” Walz said, seemingly referring to his party’s botched messaging in 2024. 

Tapper then shifted the focus back to Biden: “Don’t you think your party needs to acknowledge that President Biden was not up for the job of reelection and this was a major mistake?” 

In response, Walz retorted, “He made that decision.” 

“I know, but you all went along with the idea that he was up for it—and he wasn’t—and everybody saw it. The country rejected it,” Tapper shot back. 

Tapper’s sudden change of heart about covering of the Biden’s cognitive conveniently aligns with the release of his new book, Original Sin: President Biden’s Decline, Its Cover-Up, and His Disastrous Choice to Run Again. 

In it, Tapper cites sources close to Biden who concede the former president was not suited for a second term—claims that CNN and Tapper himself once dismissed as somehow conspiratorial. 

Outlets like Headline USA have been reporting on the president’s decline ever since he took office. 

Gov. Abbott Blocks Development of Islamic Community in North Texas

(José Niño, Headline USA) Texas Governor Greg Abbott announced last Tuesday that the East Plano Islamic Center cannot proceed with constructing a proposed Muslim neighborhood, known as EPIC City, due to unresolved legal issues. 

Texas authorities have been investigating the project, which includes over 1,000 homes, a school, college, mosque, and retail space. 

Abbott’s office stated that EPIC failed to obtain necessary permits for the construction project. 

“The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality found that the group behind the proposed EPIC compound did not submit the required permits to begin construction,” the Texas governor highlighted. “They must confirm within seven days that they are immediately ceasing any construction of their illegal project or face the full weight of the law. The State of Texas will enforce its laws and protect our communities from unlawful actions or threats posed by EPIC or its affiliates.”

The commission issued a letter to EPIC and its partners requesting confirmation that no construction has taken place.

The governor’s move follows earlier concerns about the project’s potential to foster the rise of jurisdictions subject to Sharia law — the religious legal system derived from the teachings of Islam

Abbott emphasized that Sharia law is not allowed in Texas and that the state will enforce its laws to protect communities from unlawful actions. The Texas governor tweeted, “To be clear, Sharia law is not allowed in Texas. Nor are Sharia cities. Nor are ‘no go zones’ which this project seems to imply.”

 

EPIC’s affiliates have maintained that the community will be inclusive and open to all, aiming to demonstrate harmonious coexistence.

Critics argue that the project is being unfairly targeted due to its Islamic focus. 

According to the Houston Chronicle, William White, who leads CAIR’s Houston chapter, said, “To me, as someone who is a sixth generation Texan, it reads that I’m not welcome here.”

As reported by Newsweek, EPIC’s resident scholar Yasir Qadhi said, “EPIC City is going to be a role model community of thousands of Muslims living well-integrated … We’re going to be giving back to this state and this country, and we’re going to be showing what it means to be a Muslim neighborhood.”

Dan Cogdell, the attorney representing the developer’s plan, said, “EPIC City is a thoughtful community designed for families, just like hundreds of others in Texas. The only reason it is being unfairly targeted, is because there is a mosque in the plans instead of a church or a temple. That’s it,” according to the Houston Chronicle.

Multiple agencies continue to investigate EPIC City for potential criminal violations, including allegations of attempting to circumvent Texas laws banning foreign legal systems like Sharia. Abbott reiterated that all entities in Texas must adhere to state law, not Sharia law. 

José Niño is the deputy editor of Headline USA. Follow him at x.com/JoseAlNino

Why It Isn’t Too Late to Buy Gold

(Doug Horning, Money Metals News Service) In order to determine why it isn’t too late to buy gold, we need to consider why many people might be inclined to think that it is too late.

First and foremost, gold has been on an explosive bull run, as you can see in the chart below. After being essentially flat for the first 3½ years of the 2020s—with strong resistance at $2,000/oz.—it took off for higher ground and hasn’t paused for breath since.

In March 2023, gold was priced at approximately $1,900 per troy ounce.

By March 2025, it had surged to around $3,038, marking an increase of 60%. It’s even higher ($3,125) as I write on April Fool’s Day. But it’s no joke. Gold handily trounced both the S&P 500 (+41%) and NASDAQ (+49%) over that same two-year period.

And it has been making higher and higher highs. Anyone could be forgiven for thinking that the bull must be nearing exhaustion by now.

But not so fast…

When you look at appreciation in gold (or any other asset), what you are always seeing is the gain in nominal terms. However, the proper way to view it is in inflation-adjusted terms.

Let me illustrate: what is the current buying power of the asset—in US dollars, assuming that’s your currency—vs. what it was when you acquired it?

  • This is the true measure of something’s worth. Because inflation is a currency killer.

We haven’t had zero annual inflation since the 19th century, and the past 50 years have been particularly brutal. The dollar has declined 88% since 1971 (not coincidentally, the year President Nixon ended all convertibility of dollars into gold).

Now look at gold—a/k/a real money—in this light. In early 1980, its price peaked at $850/ounce. While it has far exceeded that benchmark in the interim, it has never done so inflation-adjusted. What $850 bought in 1980 would today require you to pony up a whopping $3,291.50.

In other words, despite its run-up, gold is still less expensive than it was 45 years ago! If you’d sequestered dollar bills under your mattress in 1980, each would now be worth about 12 cents. But any gold coins you saved would have lost no buying power. None.

Gold is, and has always been, the ultimate inflation hedge. Currencies get debased, and often become worthless. Gold never has.

Here are five drivers of the current gold demand, and hence the price:

  • Geopolitical Drama – Wars, political change, and global instability. Chaos is gold’s love language.
  • Dollar weakness/inflation – As noted, the two are intertwined. Looming also are challenges to the USD’s position as the global reserve currency.
  • Stagnant supply – In 2023, about 3100 metric tons of gold were mined worldwide, a number that’s unchanged since 2014. It’s generally accepted that most of the monster deposits have already been found, and major new discoveries are rare. As it becomes ever more difficult to mine the metal economically, gold becomes scarcer.
  • Money printing – The world’s central banks are all still creating new currency units like they were M&Ms.
  • Central Banks Are Buying.

This last point is key and is worth expanding upon because central bank demand has been the primary impetus behind gold’s rapid rise in the past few years. This is a dramatic turnaround from 30 years ago.

Between 1995 and 2009, central banks were net sellers of gold, reducing their reserves. We may infer that they believed gold was no longer relevant. In 2010, they shifted to modest net buyers, with annual purchases averaging 473 tonnes (i.e., metric tons) through 2021. Then, for whatever reason, they experienced a significant attitude adjustment and engaged in really serious buying.

  • In 2022, according to the World Gold Council, central banks made record net purchases of 1,082 tonnes, more than doubling the previous decade’s average. In 2023, the number was 1,037 tonnes, and last year it was 1,045 tonnes, the third consecutive year exceeding 1,000 tonnes.

One metric ton = 32,150 troy ounces, so we’re talking a LOT of gold.

Moreover, the published figures may be an underestimate, because of the opaque nature of the Chinese market. The People’s Bank of China (PBoC) officially reported purchasing just 44 tonnes of gold during 2024, despite a six-month pause between May and October. Yet China is the world’s #1 miner, accounting for approximately 10% of global production. That amounted to output of some 370 tonnes over the course of the year, and all of it remained somewhere in the country. How much the PBoC swallowed up remains a mystery.

The odd reality is that, while central banks have been pushing gold’s price up, there has not yet been much market participation by institutions and the general public. Jewelry sales are down. Individual investors seem to largely be in a state of FOJI (fear of joining in), frightened that they may be tardy to the party.

That will change, and when it does, FOMO (fear of missing out) will replace FOJI and the bulls will likely stampede.

All of that said, it’s unwise to treat gold as a speculative investment. It’s something to buy and hold, your insurance policy against the devaluation of the electronic ledger entries that now represent dollars. Is it too late to add gold to your assets? No. Never is.

  • As a footnote, let me add that you shouldn’t be spooked by the recent tariff-induced price decline. Historically this always happens when there is a stock market crash. Traders who get caught short in their positions need to raise quick cash to cover their losses. It’s normal. And gold has always rebounded faster than stocks. If the drop may seem large at the moment, look back at the 2-year chart to see that it’s just a blip. You can wait for the dust to settle if you like, but pullbacks are invitations.

And if you are also looking for profitable investments in the gold market, consider the companies that mine the stuff. Most have yet to join in the metal’s bull run, and many are literally dirt cheap, as Jeff has pointed out. Historically, mining shares always lag physical bullion, but eventually, they always break out. When they do, their returns tend to be many multiples of further gold price appreciation. That’s why we’re aggressively investing now, check it all out here.

Originally published on The Gold Advisor.

To get Jeff Clark’s ongoing commentary on the markets, click here to subscribe to his FREE Gold Advisor and Silver Advisor email newsletters.

Supreme Court Allows Trump to Continue Venezuelan Deportations

(Bethany Blankley, The Center Square) The U.S. Supreme Court ruled Monday that a lower federal court doesn’t have jurisdiction in a lawsuit filed to prevent deportations of violent Venezuelan Tren de Aragua prison gang members illegally in the U.S.

The Supreme Court granted the Trump administration’s emergency request to intervene in a case challenging the deportations, and vacated a lower court’s temporary restraining orders that halted them.

“The Supreme Court has upheld the Rule of Law in our Nation by allowing a President, whoever that may be, to be able to secure our Borders, and protect our families and our Country, itself. A GREAT DAY FOR JUSTICE IN AMERICA!” Trump said in response.

In March, Trump issued an executive order invoking the Alien Enemies Act in response to already declaring that the U.S. was being invaded by criminal foreign nationals, including TdA members, The Center Square reported.

In response, a lawsuit was filed on behalf of five Venezuelans in the U.S. illegally, requesting a district court in the District of Columbia to halt their deportations. After nearly 300 Venezuelans were removed from the U.S. and sent to a maximum-security prison in El Salvador, a federal judge granted the request and issued two temporary restraining orders. The judge also ordered those removed be returned, which the Salvadoran president mocked, saying it was “too late,” The Center Square reported.

The judge argued the Trump administration was in defiance of a court order. The administration argued it wasn’t and appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court.

On Monday, the Supreme Court issued a three and a half page opinion, stating, “We grant the application and vacate the TROs. The detainees seek equitable relief against the implementation of the Proclamation and against their removal under the AEA. They challenge the Government’s interpretation of the Act and assert that they do not fall within the category of removable alien enemies. But we do not reach those arguments.”

“Challenges to removal under the AEA, a statute which largely ‘preclude[s] judicial review,’ … must be brought in habeas … And ‘immediate physical release [is not] the only remedy under the federal writ of habeas corpus,’” the opinion states, citing multiple court cases.

It also notes that for habeus corpus cases, the jurisdiction for ruling must in “the district of confinement,” which would be Texas, where the illegal foreign nationals were detained, not the District of Columbia where the lawsuit was filed.

“The detainees are confined in Texas, so venue is improper in the District of Columbia. As a result, the Government is likely to succeed on the merits of this action,” the opinion states.

It also notes “that the Fifth Amendment entitles aliens to due process of law in the context of removal proceedings” and that under the “AEA, detainees must receive notice after the date of this order that they are subject to removal under the Act.”

“Detainees subject to removal orders under the AEA are entitled to notice and an opportunity to challenge their removal,” the opinion states. “The only question is which court will resolve that challenge,” which it says “lies in the district of confinement.”

Justice Brett Kavanaugh issued a separate concurring opinion.

Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, Ketanji Brown Jackson and Amy Coney Barrett issued a dissenting opinion, arguing the administration’s actions were done “without any due process of law, under the auspices of the Alien Enemies Act, a 1798 law designated for times of war.”

When Trump declared an invasion at the southwest border and designated Mexican cartels and TdA as FTOs, he argued they were engaging in asymmetric warfare against Americans, The Center Square reported.

He took action after a record more than 1 million Venezuelans illegally entered the U.S. under the Biden administration, including TdA members who expanded criminal operations in at least 22 states including killing Americans, The Center Square reported.

The dissent also argues the Supreme Court intervening in the case “is as inexplicable as it is dangerous.

“Against the backdrop of the U. S. Government’s unprecedented deportation of dozens of immigrants to a foreign prison without due process, a majority of this Court sees fit to vacate the District Court’s order. The reason, apparently, is that the majority thinks plaintiffs’ claims should have been styled as habeas actions and filed in the districts of their detention. In reaching that result, the majority flouts well-established limits on its jurisdiction, creates new law on the emergency docket, and elides the serious threat our intervention poses to the lives of individual detainees.”

After the ruling, removal of Venezuelan TdA members illegally in the U.S. will continue.

 

Recession Warning? Consumer Borrowing Tanked in February

(Mike Maharrey, Money Metals News Service) There is growing evidence that Americans may be edging close to the credit limit.

That’s bad news for an economy that has run on credit cards for the last few years and adds to worries that the U.S. could be barreling toward a recession.

After slowing in January, consumer borrowing crashed in February.

Total consumer debt contracted by $0.8 billion, a -0.2 percent decline, according to the latest data from the Federal Reserve.

The slowdown in borrowing was sharp and unexpected. Analysts had forecast a $15 billion increase in consumer debt. Investing.com called it “a surprising turn of events.”

“Consumer Credit is closely tied to consumer spending and confidence, making this decline a potential cause for concern. … This contraction in Consumer Credit could signal a decrease in consumer spending and confidence.”

Even with the slowdown in borrowing, American consumers are still buried under $5 trillion in consumer debt.

The Federal Reserve consumer debt figures include credit card debt, student loans, and auto loans but do not factor in mortgage debt. When you include mortgages, U.S. households are buried under a record level of debt. As of the end of 2024, total household debt stood at $18.4 trillion.

Revolving credit, primarily reflecting credit card debt, barely budged, rising by just $100 million, a 0.1 percent increase.

Americans have now run up their credit card balances to a record $1.32 trillion.

The double whammy of rising debt and interest rates exacerbates the debt problem. The average annual percentage rate (APR) currently stands at 20.09 percent, with some companies still charging rates as high as 28 percent. The average is only slightly down from the record high of 20.79 percent set last August.

Rates aren’t coming down much, even with Federal Reserve rate cuts. According to an ABC News report, despite a full percentage point in rate cuts, credit card companies are charging a higher margin “to weather default risk, cover overhead costs and recoup profits, experts added.

Credit card rates are high, and they’re staying high,” Bankrate analyst Ted Rossman told ABC News.

The Fed’s recent pause in rate cuts is more bad news for consumers buried in debt.

Americans are starting to struggle to pay those high credit card bills.

According to the New York Fed, in the fourth quarter of 2024, “Aggregate delinquency rates ticked up 0.1 percentage point (ppt) from the previous quarter to 3.6 percent of outstanding debt in some stage of delinquency.”

According to PYMNTS Intelligence, credit cards are the loan type with the highest share of balance 90+ days delinquent, currently at 11.5 percent.

As traditional credit avenues creep closer to their limits, it appears that consumers are turning to buy-now-pay-later to keep spending. According to PYMNTS, “The torrid pace of activity at the likes of Sezzle and Affirm — as many categories saw double-digit spending (and Sezzle notched triple-digit revenue growth) — has far outstripped the growth in the Fed’s data.

Subprime credit card borrowers are struggling the most, with delinquency rates nudging upward by about 5.6 percent since the Federal Reserve began raising rates to battle price inflation.

Despite strong retail spending in December for the holiday season, the bigger picture reveals a consumer under stress.

Given these dynamics, it’s no wonder consumers are trying to borrow less.

Non-revolving credit, primarily reflecting outstanding auto loans, student loans, and loans for other big-ticket durable goods, contracted in February, falling by -0.3 percent after a downwardly revised increase of just 0.8 percent in January.

This was a significant slowdown from the 5.2 percent in December and is more in line with the tepid growth of around 2 percent in non-revolving credit over the last year as consumers cut back on big-ticket spending to cover the increasing costs of day-to-day necessities.

Before the pandemic, revolving credit growth averaged 5 percent.

This big drop in consumer borrowing reverts to a trend we saw developing last fall. Credit card spending tanked in August and remained muted in September. They pulled out the plastic again for the holidays, but that might have been a last gasp for the American consumer.

The bottom line is that Americans have blown through the savings they accumulated during the pandemic and have run their credit cards close to the limit. An economy run on Visa and Mastercard simply isn’t sustainable. When Americans do hit their credit limit, it will have major implications for economic growth.


Mike Maharrey is a journalist and market analyst for Money Metals with over a decade of experience in precious metals. He holds a BS in accounting from the University of Kentucky and a BA in journalism from the University of South Florida.

Why Gold? The Russian Case Study

(Mike Maharrey, Money Metals News Service) If you wonder why so many central banks continue to load up on gold, Russia’s experience with the yellow metal provides the answer.

Russia launched a gold buying spree beginning in 2014. Over the next six years, the Bank of Russia increased its reserves by around 40 million ounces (1,244 tonnes).

During this period, the price of gold ranged from $1,100 to $1,500 an ounce.

Fast forward to today. The price of gold has climbed to $3,000 an ounce, and Russian gold reserves have surged by around $96 billion, a 72 percent increase.

Meanwhile, Russia was cut off from the Western financial system, and many of its assets, including some of its foreign currency reserves, were frozen in response to its invasion of Ukraine. According to Bloomberg, blocked funds amount to around $322 billion.

All of that gold has served as a lifeline for the Russian economy.

To put things into perspective, if the Russians never recover any of their frozen assets, the increase in value of its gold reserves would cover about 1/3 of the loss.

And as Bloomberg put it, if an end to the war includes the unfreezing of those assets, “The Kremlin would sit on a financial cushion the likes of which it has never had before.

When the war began, Russia held about half of its reserves in dollar, euro, and pound sterling assets. The other half was in yuan and gold, which remain accessible.

The Russians also made a shrewd move prior to the invasion of Ukraine, transferring their National Welfare Fund holdings into yuan (60 percent) and gold (40 percent). A RAND Corporation study notes, “This was an indication that Russia was preparing for increased Western economic pressure. During the war, Russia has been using these funds to support the budget.

Bloomberg Economics analyst Alex Isakov noted that “Accumulating a gold pile was a hedge against geopolitical shocks — it worked.”

“The Bank of Russia’s approach to gold purchases addressed three different goals: (i) diversifying international reserve assets away from the risks of reserve currency issuing countries, (ii) boosting domestic local currency liquidity by exchanging physical gold for rubles, and (iii) providing a source of stable demand for local gold miners. The increase in the value of gold holdings proves the diversification and hedging value of gold reserves.

“Currently, the Russians appear content to sit on their gold cushion. According to Renaissance Capital Head of Research Oleg Kuzmin, the Bank of Russia has enough liquidity in yuan to deal with any potential shocks. Unless there is a major crisis, the Russians are unlikely to sell, given the “limited options to reallocate funds amid sanctions.”

That doesn’t mean Russia hasn’t put its gold to work.

According to the RAND study, “Gold has become a strategic resource for the Russian state.

Gold has a bearing on Russia’s revenue generation capacity and its monetary policy; it is central to Russia’s international campaign for de-dollarization; and it plays an important part in Russia’s wartime trade relations, notably as a means of payment.

“The Russian state is evidently encouraging barter and exchange-in-kind, and otherwise resorting to gold to secure hard currency and foreign goods, but the scale, terms, and participants in these activities is unknown.”

According to the Kyiv Independent, Russia is exchanging gold for other currencies, including dollars and euros. The country has also used gold directly for purchases.

“There is little doubt that Russia is already using gold to pay for goods it cannot procure conventionally, or for transactions it wishes to obscure. An open-source investigation by Sayari, for example, revealed that unsanctioned banks were trading gold for cash in Turkey. Russia has also partly paid Iranian drone manufacturer Sahara Thunder in gold for 6,000 Shahed drones and related equipment.”

Despite their best efforts, the West has found it difficult to stop Russia from using its gold due to its fungible nature (easy to exchange) and the global demand for the precious metal.

Gold is money and it is recognized as such everywhere. Even if they don’t want dollars or some other fiat currencies, everybody wants gold.

This is not to justify Russia’s wartime actions. It merely underscores the nature of gold as money and its important role in the global economy. When fiat currencies are cut off or fail, gold will always remain a viable alternative.

This is precisely why so many countries are accumulating gold at a rapid pace.

Official central bank gold demand topped 1,000 tonnes for the third straight year in 2024. To put that into perspective, central bank gold reserves increased by an average of just 473 tonnes annually between 2010 and 2021.

The pace of central bank gold buying picked up after the aggressive Western sanctioning of Russia. Other countries have noted the weaponization of the dollar and have taken steps to decrease their dependence on the greenback.

According to a report by the Atlantic Council, “In recent years, and especially since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and the Group of Seven (G7)’s subsequent escalation in the use of financial sanctions, some countries have been signaling their intention to diversify away from dollars.

Meanwhile, the share of dollars in foreign reserves has sagged.

Other countries have recognized the power of gold and the risk of holding dollars.

It’s a lesson individuals should take note of as well.


Mike Maharrey is a journalist and market analyst for Money Metals with over a decade of experience in precious metals. He holds a BS in accounting from the University of Kentucky and a BA in journalism from the University of South Florida.

Defense Accuses FBI of Manipulating Witness Who Identified Would-be Trump Assassin

(Ken Silva, Headline USA) Attorneys for accused would-be Trump assassin Ryan Routh have filed a motion to exclude testimony from a witness who purportedly saw Routh flee the crime scene last September.

According to Routh’s attorneys, the FBI manipulated the witness, who is identified in court records as “T.C.M.,” into identifying their client as the man who fled Donald Trump’s Florida golf course after a Secret Service agent spotted him hiding in the nearby bushes.

The defense’s Monday court filing—one of a flurry made that day—says that T.C.M. was driving to a furniture store at 1:30 p.m. when “he” saw a disheveled male run from the bushes along the exterior of Trump International Golf Club and across Summit Boulevard toward a dirt parking lot (initial reports identified the witness as female, but the defense filing identifies T.C.M. as a male).

The witness purportedly saw the man approach a black vehicle, drop a small dark object through the sunroof, and then enter and drive away. The witness took three photographs of the vehicle, including of its license plate number, 97 EEE.

“T.C.M. described the suspect as a white male, 6’2” in height, light colored hair, and wearing a dark shirt and dark pants. According to Detective Gomez, T.C.M. described the male ‘as a younger male in his twenties,’” Routh’s attorneys said.

About an hour later, Martin County Deputy Sheriffs stopped Ryan Routh, driving a 2007 black Nissan Xterra with the same license plate. However, the vehicle didn’t have a sunroof, contrary to what the witness told police, according to the defense.

Once Routh was handcuffed and put in the back of a police vehicle, detectives spoke to T.C.M. and asked him to identify their suspect. T.C.M. was flown in a police helicopter from Palm Beach to Martin County, where he said that Routh “had the same hair and build” as the person he saw.

Police then took Routh and the witness to Palm Beach County Police station in West Palm Beach, where the former was photographed.

“Six hours later, FBI agents interviewed T.C.M. They showed him a single photograph of Ryan Routh and asked him to identify him as the male he saw running near the area of the gun shots. T.C.M. agreed that was the man from this single photo line-up,” the defense said.

According to the defense, the manner in which local and federal law enforcement handled the witness was highly manipulative.

“A show-up is inherently suggestive because the police present a single suspect to a witness thereby increasing the likelihood of misidentification. Here, the police exacerbated the suggestiveness of this procedure by presenting a suspect bound in handcuffs, in a police car, and surrounded by law enforcement,” defense attorneys argued.

“Second, following the show-up, the FBI conducted an improper photographic procedure by showing T.C.M. a single photograph of Mr. Routh. Consequently, the FBI also led T.C.M. to believe that Mr. Routh was the one, and only, suspect. These repeated, suggestive procedures created a substantial likelihood of misidentification, for which the introduction would violate Mr. Routh’s right to Due Process,” they said.

The defense further noted that T.C.M. described the man who fled Trump’s golf course as being in his 20s, while Routh was 58 at the time of the crime.

Now, the witness’s memory has been “tainted” by law enforcement’s actions, they argued.

“The significance of the impressions made by law enforcement on T.C.M.’s out of court identifications cannot be dismissed,” they argued, concluding: “This Court should recognize that danger and suppress the impermissibly tainted out of court identifications and any future in-court identifications.”

Also on Monday, Routh’s attorneys argued that the DOJ’s firearms charges against him should be dismissed on Second Amendment grounds. The DOJ countered by asking Judge Aileen Cannon to prohibit Routh from mounting bizarre legal defenses, such as that he was morally justified in plotting to assassinate Trump. As Headline USA reported Monday night, the DOJ also revealed bombshell allegations that Routh tired buying a stinger missile from a Ukrainian associate weeks before his attempt, and that he had an escape route planned with a human smuggler in Mexico.

Routh’s next court hearing is set for April 15, when the motions described above will presumably be discussed. He is set to stand trial in September.

Ken Silva is the editor of Headline USA. Follow him at x.com/jd_cashless.