Weiss Admits Ignorance of Protocols Preventing Bias in Hunter Biden’s Investigation

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) David Weis, the U.S. district attorney for the District of Delaware, appeared to rebuff allegations of potential bias in the criminal investigation into Hunter Biden, son of President Joe Biden. 

The scrutiny intensified during Weiss’s appearance before the House Judiciary Committee, following an agreement for a closed-door meeting on Nov. 7. 

According to newly reviewed transcripts by the Daily Caller, Weiss admitted that he was unaware of potential protocols to block potential pro-hunter biases in the probe. 

“I’m not aware of protocols,” Weiss stated when questioned about internal DOJ procedures regarding potential favoritism in the case. 

“And look, my interest and the interest of prosecutors in my office is pursuing cases, and we should be pursuing cases based on the laws and the facts, period,” he added.

Despite asserting his lack of awareness regarding potential biases in the probe, Weiss later altered his stance when presented with additional information.  

“Again, I’m not going to comment on any aspect of the investigation or a prosecution, and from my perspective, the prosecutors who participated in this case followed the law and the facts,” Weiss declared. 

“I’ve told you. I have no such process. We haven’t experienced it in our office. And to generally — I don’t have an answer,” Weiss doubled down. 

The Caller detailed Weiss’s acknowledgment of damning testimony from IRS whistleblowers Gary Shapley and Joseph Ziegler, both accusing the DOJ of obstructing early charges against Hunter.

“I am aware that you have two whistleblowers who have testified. That’s correct,” Weiss alleged, but declined to address pressing questions about the whistleblower’s allegations. 

He added, “It’s not something I experienced. I understand what your representation is with respect to these whistleblowers, and that would have me commenting on specifics relative to this investigation and this case.” 

Weiss’s remarks appeared to contradict findings from the whistleblower who explicitly accused Assistant Delaware U.S. Attorney Lesley Wolf of shielding Biden from a purported search warrant, in addition to prohibiting the search of a storage unit owned by Hunter. 

The Republican-led Judiciary Committee is propping up its impeachment inquiry into what conservatives describe as mounting evidence of alleged corruption and foreign influence peddling. 

‘You Look Like a Smurf’: Comer Lobs Hilarious Rebuke Against Dem Who Targeted Family

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer, R-Ky, found a creative way to counter criticism from Rep. Jared Moskowitz, D-Fla, who had targeted Comer’s family finances.  

During a congressional hearing on Tuesday, Comer compared Moskowitz to a “Smurf” in a response that had Twitter flooded with laughter.

The exchange between the two lawmakers centered around a financial transaction of $218,000 involving Comer’s brother, as highlighted in a report by the Daily Beast.  

Moskowitz attempted to question Comer’s family dealings during a Tuesday hearing, particularly focusing on the transaction with his brother.

“You also do business with your brother with potential loans. And so, since you have framed that and manipulated that with the American people, that Joe Biden did something wrong when he wasn’t in office, I just would like to know if you would like to use some of my time,” Moskowitz said. 

In response, Comer swiftly clarified the nature of the transaction, saying the payment to his brother was for the alleged purchase of a property rather than a loan.

“I’ve never loaned my brother one penny,” Comer declared. “My father, who was a dentist, had some farmland. He died and my brother couldn’t afford it. He wanted to sell it but he wanted to keep it in the family. So I bought it from my brother.” 

The humorous twist came when Comer, after a few exchanges, quipped, “No, I’m not gonna give you your time back. We can stop the clock,” Comer said. “You look like a Smurf here just going around on all this stuff.” 

In response, Moskowitz pushed back claiming, “You go on Fox News and say loans and deals are a way to evade taxes? We don’t know if that’s what you’re doing or not.”

 

The Oversight Committee, along with the Judiciary Committee and the Ways and Means Committee, is leading an impeachment inquiry against President Joe Biden’s alleged political corruption and foreign influence peddling. 

Rep. McCarthy Faces Ethics Complaint After Reportedly Sucker-Punching Burchett

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) Rep. Mat Gaetz, R-Fla., a vocal critic of former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, has filed a scathing ethics complaint against the California Republican.  

The complaint revolves around McCarthy’s alleged physical altercation with Rep. Tim Burchett, R-Tenn., who played a key role in the recent move to oust McCarthy from the speakership.

Gaetz wasted no time in delivering a one-page letter to the House Committee on Ethics, urging for an “immediate” and “swift investigation” into the reported altercation. He did not hold back in expressing his concerns about the state of decorum in the current Congress.” 

“This Congress has seen a substantial increase in breaches of decorum unlike anything we have seen since the pre-Civil War era,” Gaetz emphasized in his complaint. 

“I myself have been a victim of outrageous conduct on the House floor as well, but nothing like an open and public assault on a Member, committed by another Member. The rot starts at the top,” he added.

Burchett, who described the incident as a “sucker punch” and a “clean shot to the kidney,” told CNN that he was shocked at the alleged assault.

Responding to the ethics complaint, McCarthy dismissed Gaetz’s allegations and took a jab at the Florida Republican, who is facing an ethics investigation for alleged sexual misconduct and misuse of funds. 

“I think Ethics is a good place for Gaetz to be at,” McCarthy told reporters on Tuesday.

McCarthy also downplayed the alleged physical assault, claiming, “I would not hit him in the kidney. I guess our shoulders hit, because Burchett runs up to me afterwards. I did not know what he was talking about. If I would hit somebody, they would know I hit them.”

The reported altercation comes in the aftermath of McCarthy’s surprising revelation that he was most taken aback by the votes of Burchett and Rep. Nancy Mace, R-S.C., in support of the Gaetz-led motion to vacate the speakership.

This unprecedented move forced McCarthy to step down from his position, marking a historic moment in U.S. congressional history.

Jenna Ellis Blasted for Trump Betrayal Despite $200K Defense Fund from MAGA

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) Investigative journalist Laura Loomer condemned former Trump attorney Jenna Ellis, accusing her of betraying former President Donald Trump despite raising a substantial $200,000 through a legal defense fund predominantly fueled by MAGA supporters. 

Loomer exposed a screenshot on Tuesday from a left-wing political commentator, Ron Filipkowski, who cynically mocked Trump supporters for contributing to Ellis’ fund, insinuating that the money would be used against Trump.

“I have been proven right once again. The left is now bragging online about how the donations sent to Grifter Jenna Ellis’s ‘legal defense fund’ will be used to attack President Trump,” Loomer tweeted on Tuesday. 

Filipkowski, the editor-in-chief of Meidas Touch, derisively thanked MAGA supporters for funding Ellis, alleging that she utilized the $200,000 to collaborate with prosecutors led by Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis. 

“Hey MAGA, Thanks for sending Jenna that $200,000 so she could use it to rat out Trump and his henchmen. Money well spent,” Flilipkowski said on Nov. 13. 

The criticism intensified after leaked testimony to ABC News indicated that Ellis informed prosecutors that she was told that Trump was “not going to leave” to leave the White House after the 2020 election loss.

In return for her cooperation, Ellis managed to avoid jail time, facing only a modest $5,000 fine — a meager sum compared to the substantial funds raised on social media.

Loomer, renowned for her vocal pro-Trump stance on Twitter, expressed her reproach in Ellis for allegedly misleading donors.  “I TOLD YOU NOT TO DONATE TO THIS DISLOYAL WENCH,” Loomer declared on October 24. 

“Today she accepted a plea deal, which will only require her to pay a $5,000 fine and get probation for 5 years. She didn’t even attempt to fight the charges. … $216,000!!!! WHAT A SCAM!!!  You should feel ashamed of yourself if you donated to her,” Loomer added. 

Ever since parting ways with Trump, Ellis has shifted her allegiance, openly supporting Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, who is running against Trump in the 2024 presidential election, and distancing herself from the MAGA movement.

Weepy, Apologetic DePape Touts ‘Rapport’ w/ Pelosi, Makes Fishy Q’Anon Claims

(Headline USA) The man accused of attacking former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s husband with a hammer apologized Tuesday and touted his “really good rapport” with his victim, further fueling suspicious about the man’s true motives in what many believe was a lover’s quarrel or a false flag set up to deflect from David DePape’s actual ties to a group of pedophile cultists in the Bay area.

DePape spoke for more than an hour in which he tearfully recounted about how his political leanings went from leftist to right-wing after reading a comment on a YouTube video about former President Donald Trump. He claimed he bludgeoned Paul Pelosi after realizing his larger plan might be unraveling.

Testimony wrapped up later Tuesday, with closing arguments expected Wednesday.

DePape has pleaded not guilty to attempted kidnapping of a federal official and assault on the immediate family member of a federal official with intent to retaliate against the official for performance of their duties.

His attorneys argue that he was not seeking to go after Nancy Pelosi because of her official duties as a member of Congress and so the charges do not fit.

The attack happened in the early hours of Oct. 28, 2022, just days before the midterm elections.

DePape claimed he went to the Pelosis’ home to talk to Nancy Pelosi about Russian involvement in the 2016 election, and that he planned to wear an inflatable unicorn costume and upload his interrogation of her online. Prosecutors say he had rope and zip ties with him.

DePape testified that his plan was to get Nancy Pelosi and other targets to admit to their corruption and eventually get President Joe Bident to pardon them all.

“It’s just easier giving them a pardon so we can move forward as a country,” he said, crying.

In testimony Monday, Paul Pelosi recounted the attack publicly for the first time. He recalled being awakened by a man bursting into the bedroom door asking, “Where’s Nancy?” He said that when he responded that his wife was in Washington, DePape said he would tie him up while they waited for her.

He testified that he was eventually able to call police from his cellphone. When officers arrived, DePape hit him with a hammer, Pelosi said, adding that DePape told him he was going to have “to take you out.”

DePape, meanwhile said the two got along surprisingly well under the circumstances, right up until the attack.

“I felt bad for him because we had a really good rapport and things were going good until the very last second,” he said.

A neurosurgeon who operated on Paul Pelosi after the attack testified that he had two wounds on his head, including a fracture to his skull that had to be mended with plates and screws. Pelosi also needed stitches on injuries in his right arm and hand.

“He was never my target and I’m sorry that he got hurt,” DePape said.

“I reacted because my plan was basically ruined,” he said when asked why he hit Pelosi.

He said he believed Paul Pelosi was dead up until he saw the charges.

Defense attorney Jodi Linker told jurors last week that DePape believed he was taking action to stop government corruption, the erosion of freedom in the United States, and the abuse of children by politicians and actors.

DePape testified he first was drawn to right-wing conspiracies after learning about “Gamergate,” an online harassment campaign against women in the video gaming community that took place about a decade ago. He said he often played video games for up to six hours a day while listening to political podcasts.

He heard about one of his targets, a University of Michigan professor, while listening to conservative commentator James Lindsay.

“The takeaway I got is that she wants to turn our schools into pedophile molestation factories,” he said.

In rants posted on a blog and online forum that were taken down after his arrest, DePape questioned the results of the 2020 election and echoed the QAnon conspiracy theory that claims the U.S. government is run by a cabal of devil-worshipping pedophiles.

The professor testified that some of her writings have been misconstrued to fit a narrative against the gay movement. U.S. District Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley ordered her name not be put in the public record because of threats against her.

Asked by DePape’s defense attorney if she supported the abuse of children, the professor responded, “Absolutely not.”

She said that after Paul Pelosi was attacked, the FBI informed her that she was DePape’s main target. She said that she told university administrators and that they have taken measures to protect her, her students, and other staff.

DePape’s claims have struck some as dubious given his own connections to far-left groups, including a romantic relationship with a well-known San Francisco nudist who has long been at the center of allegations involving pedophilia herself.

Oxane “Gypsy” Taub, who has two sons with DePape, regularly allowed the underage boys, as well as DePape’s underage stepdaughter, to parade naked through the streets of San Francisco surrounded by adults.

Taub also served prison time in Berkeley following allegations that she had an inappropriate sexual relationship with one of the boys’ 14-year-old friends. However, she and the sons were present at DePape’s trial showing their support, according to media reports.

“Taub called DePape’s name softly and blew a kiss, and he smiled and waved in return,” wrote the Associated Press.

Whatever the case may be, both the Pelosis and DePape seem to be invested in pushing the same narrative that right-wing conspiracy theories were to blame—a defense that is more likely to gain a sympathetic ear in San Francisco than elsewhere.

After his arrest, DePape, 43, allegedly told a San Francisco detective that he wanted to hold Nancy Pelosi hostage. He said if she told him the truth, he would let her go and if she lied, he was going to “break her kneecaps” to show other members of Congress there were “consequences to actions,” according to prosecutors.

Other witnesses who testified Tuesday included Daniel Bernal, Nancy Pelosi’s San Francisco chief of staff, and DePape neighbor Elizabeth Yates, who said she allowed him to shower at her home once a week.

If convicted, DePape faces life in prison. He has pleaded not guilty to charges in state court of attempted murder, assault with a deadly weapon, elder abuse, residential burglary and other felonies. A state trial has not been scheduled.

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

NYC Mayor Admits to Doing Favor for Turkish Consul, but Denies Impropriety

(Headline USA) New York Mayor Eric Adams declared that “we follow the law” but deflected key questions Tuesday about an FBI investigation into his 2021 campaign, while his lawyer said there were no signs that the inquiry was targeting the mayor.

After the FBI seized his phones and iPad last week, the first-term Democrat reiterated Tuesday that he was cooperating with what he called a “review” and said he wouldn’t speculate on its outcome.

Insisting that he didn’t want to impede the investigation, he and his chief City Hall lawyer declined to say whether other administration or campaign figures’ electronics were turned over, whether the FBI had asked to interview the mayor, or who or what another Adams attorney meant in saying last week that “an individual had recently acted improperly.”

But Zornberg did say that “there has been no indication that I’ve seen that the mayor is a target.”

The federal investigation burst into public view on Nov. 2 when agents searched the home of Adams’ chief fundraiser during his 2021 mayoral campaign, Briana Suggs.

The development prompted Adams to bail out of a scheduled White House meeting and fly home from Washington, later explaining he wanted to be among his staffers because “a leader needs to be here during those difficult times.”

Four days later after the search at Suggs’s home, FBI agents stopped Adams as he was leaving a public event, asked his police security detail to step away and took his electronic devices.

The U.S. attorney’s office in Manhattan, which is overseeing the probe, is declining to comment. A spokesperson for Suggs has also declined to comment. Neither she nor Adams has been accused of wrongdoing.

The New York Times reported that a search warrant indicated authorities have been examining whether the Adams campaign conspired with the Turkish government to receive illegal campaign contributions from foreign sources, funneled through straw donors.

Investigators have also looked into whether Adams took steps in 2021 to help the Turkish government get city approval to open a Manhattan skyscraper, despite concerns about the building’s fire prevention systems, according to the newspaper.

“We don’t do the straw donors. We don’t, you know, do quid pro quo. We follow the law. I’m very clear on that,” Adams said Tuesday.

Weeks before the high-rise was due to open—with Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan cutting the ribbon—the country’s consul general in New York asked Adams to inquire about the status of the building’s occupancy permit.

The document was on hold because the Fire Department had concerns about the fire-protection plan for the tower. Called the Turkevi Center, it houses offices and diplomatic facilities.

Adams, then Brooklyn’s borough president, had limited power over city government. But he was the Democratic nominee for mayor and widely expected to win.

Adams acknowledged Tuesday that he contacted then-Fire Commissioner Daniel Nigro “to find out what was happening.”

But Adams said he didn’t order the commissioner to do anything, nor talk to any other fire officials about the building.

The mayor said he was only fulfilling his duty as an elected official to help constituents navigate city government, and he said he had been thinking of Turkish constituents in Brooklyn.

“This is what we do every day. You reach out to an agency and ask them to look into the matter. You don’t reach out to an agency to compel them to do anything,” he said.

Nigro, now retired, declined to comment when reached by phone Tuesday.

According to the New York Times, a fire protection consultant working on the Turkevi Center reported numerous deficiencies involving smoke detectors, elevators, doors and other components used to prevent fires.

After the consultant, Sparc Fire Protection Engineering, said guards would be put on a fire watch until all the issues were resolved, the fire department issued a temporary certificate allowing the building to be occupied.

Days later, on Sept. 21, 2021, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan cut the ribbon on the Turkevi Center.

Messages seeking comment were sent Monday and Tuesday to Sparc and the Turkish consulate.

Adams urged people to let the investigation take its course. Asked whether he would resign if indicted, Adams seemed taken aback.

“I’m not going to speculate on that. You’re all the way downfield,” Adams said, chuckling.

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

DNA Fragments Found in Pfizer COVID Vax, May Be Source of Ailments

(Dmytro “Henry” Aleksandrov, Headline USA) During a hearing on Monday, members of Congress were warned by scientists that DNA fragments were detected in the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine.

Among the witnesses who were testifying to a hearing in Washington, DC, that was convened by Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R–Ga., was Dr. Robert Malone, who helped invent the messenger RNA [mRNA] technology that the companies used for the shot, the Epoch Times reported.

It was revealed that the vaccine includes a DNA sequence called Simian Virus 40 [SV40] that was not disclosed to at least some regulators. Malone also said that, in addition to that, the sequence leaves behind residual DNA that could cause problems.

“That’s a proven genotoxicity risk,” Malone said, later adding that there is a possibility that the fragments are causing the unusual types of cancers that have appeared following the rollout of the vaccines.

“I speculate that what we may find is that the cancer risk here may be partially attributed to these DNA contaminations. That would be consistent with the peer-reviewed literature. And by the way, these DNA fragments may also be shown to contribute to genetic anomalies in the fetus[es], which is one of the most prominent causes of premature abortion,” he said.

The inclusion of the sequence means the vaccine is adulterated and should be recalled by the FDA, Malone previously said.

Pfizer and BioNTech did not highlight the inclusion of the sequence when submitting paperwork, according to both Health Canada and the European Medicines Agency.

“The rules are that you don’t draw conclusions without data. Normally, historically, one has to perform rigorous genotoxicity and insertional mutagenesis assays,” Malone said, adding that there is no evidence that the FDA performed those tests or ordered the companies to perform them.

In a Moderna patent, Moderna said that directly injecting DNA into living hosts comes with “potential problems, including the possibility of insertional mutagenesis, which could lead to the activation of oncogenes or the inhibition of tumor suppressor genes,” Malone pointed out in his blog.

Biden Approves $10B to Iran, Source Says

(Dmytro “Henry” Aleksandrov, Headline USA) It was reported that the Biden administration would approve a sanctions waiver on Tuesday, which would allow Iran to access at least $10 billion in previously frozen funds that were held in Iraq.

A closely watched decision came just a month after the Iran-backed terrorist group Hamas launched an attack on Israel that left more than 1,200 innocent people dead, according to the Washington Free Beacon.

The news source also added that the waiver would extend the multibillion-dollar sanctions relief that was first issued in July 2023 and expired on Nov. 14, 2023. The waiver allowed Iraq to transfer frozen electricity payments into Iranian-owned bank accounts in Europe and Oman.

The renewal of the waiver raised some concerns that the Biden administration is maintaining financial avenues for Tehran as the country’s terrorist proxies murder innocent people by starting constant wars across the Middle East.

Among many other people, a senior advisor at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies and sanctions expert who previously served on the White House National Security Council criticized the Biden administration.

“The world is living in a post-Oct. 7 world, but the White House is still running an Oct. 6 policy toward Iran. Why should Iran have any access to more than $10 billion after sponsoring one of the worst terrorist attacks against American citizens and the worst massacre of Jews since the Holocaust? It would make more sense to freeze all of these accounts and keep every penny out of Tehran’s hands,” the advisor said.

Even though the Biden administration paused a $6 billion ransom payment to Iran after Congress pressured it to do so, the Iraq-Europe-Oman sanctions waiver signaled that the government of the United States is still trying to provide financial relief to the regime that funds terrorists all the time.

The Gaza war has already “spilled over into neighboring Lebanon and may even widen in scope” as Iranian-armed Hezbollah fighters become more active in the conflict, Iranian military officials warned on Monday.

Tehran also rallied Arab nations against Israel, threatening to prolong the war and open more fronts.

AOC Claims She Was Raised by Jewish People, Has ‘a Lot of Jewish Friends’

(Jacob Bruns, Headline USA) Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y.—who has in the past sided with Hamas against Israel (and accused the latter of “ethnic cleansing” for defending itself)—remarkably claimed that she was raised by Jews in a speech Monday night.

“I had a lot of Jewish friends growing up,” she said. “I grew up with great fellowship with the Jewish community.”

Ocasio–Cortez and several other embattled “Squad” members were able to find a group of what they claimed were Jewish rabbis to stand in solidarity with them, less than a week since pro-Hamas Rep. Rashida Tlaib, D-Mich., was censured by the U.S. House for her anti-Semitic hate speech.

Flanked by members of the group Rabbis for Ceasefire, AOC insisted that the idea of telling Jewish people to turn the other cheek—to lay down their weapons and forget the long-held principle of “an eye for an eye,” as found in Exodus 21:23–27—was, in fact, antithetical to the sacred teachings of Judaism that she had absorbed through osmosis as a child.

“The idea that calling for a ceasefire would somehow be anti-Semitic is actually so upside-down,” she claimed. “It’s actually contrary to the values of this community that helped raise me, frankly.”

In fact, most Jewish rabbis have supported the war and fervently opposed any sort of ceasefire on the part of Israel.

“A ‘humanitarian pause’ would be anything but humanitarian—it would permit Hamas to regroup, rearm, feed their families and their allies, while the physical and emotional torment of the Jewish captives and their families continues unabated,” wrote Rabbi Yoel Schonfeld, a representative of more than 2,500 rabbis in support of Israel’s effort, according to the Daily Signal.

Still, that did not stop AOC from appealing to her “Jewish friends”—a trope that leftists themselves often decry as a microaggression or a preface to bigotry when those on the Right invoke their minority friends.

For example, then-CNN host Don Lemon once grilled former Sen. Rick Santorum, R-Pa., for saying that some of his best friends were gay, eliciting in response a thousand-word think-piece from the New Republic.

The cliche is so commonly ridiculed that even the New York Times published an op-ed about it 2018—following then-Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam’s notorious blackface scandal—claiming “it’s a myth that proximity to blackness immunizes white people from doing racist things.”

But if claiming proximity to a culture is a minor offense, AOC’s actual appropriation of Jewish culture, by insisting she was raised Jewish in order to excuse her anti-Semitic views, is far more egregious an offense.

Ocasio–Cortez initially proclaimed her Jewish heritage in 2018, suggesting that she can trace her Jewish ancestry back to the 15th-century Spain.

“I knew it! I sensed it!” she said at the time, while lighting Hanukkah candles. She said  her ancestors “continued to practice their faith, continued to be who they were,” despite pressures from Spanish Catholics to convert or go elsewhere.

Meanwhile, while she was busy stealing other people’s culture, President Joe Biden was stealing hers, declaring himself to be a scrappy Puerto Rican kid from the barrio in one of his many invented narratives.

Headline USA’s Ben Sellers contributed to this report.

OB-GYN Testifies that Miscarriage Rates Have Doubled Since COVID Vax

(Jacob Bruns, Headline USA) A medical doctor specializing in obstetrics and gynecology testified before the U.S. Congress on Monday that miscarriage rates have doubled since the arrival of the COVID-19 vaccine, Vigilant News reported.

“I’ve never seen this before,” said Kimberly Biss, who testified alongside Robert Malone, a prominent vaccine skeptic, and Tom Renz, an attorney and anti-vax activist.

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., organized the panel discussion on “Injuries Caused by COVID-19 Vaccines” on Monday, which included members of both the House and Senate.

Among the participants, all Republicans, were Sen. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, and Reps. Clay Higgins of Louisiana, Warren Davidson of Ohio, Andy Biggs of Arizona, Matt Gaetz of Florida and Thomas Massie of Kentucky.

Greene, who came prepared with a chart noting the uptick in miscarriages, asked Biss whether she had noticed an increase that may be correlated with the vaccine.

new patients vs miscarriages
A chart showing the number of new patients (blue) versus the number of miscarriages (orange) for the years 2020 through 2022. / IMAGE: @RepMTG via YouTube

“How many of your patients or pregnant women that you know of experience miscarriages after taking the COVID-19 vaccines — or injections?” she questioned.

According to Biss, most of her patients had received three jabs, but stopped getting them recently.

“Very few received four or more,” she noted before suggesting that the effects of the vaccines appeared to be enduring quite far into the future.

“The majority of the patients received their injections in 2021 and early 2022,” she said.

“However, we’re still seeing lingering effects,” she added, calling the trend “concerning.”

Biss also told congress that the normal miscarriage rate lingered around 4%, but in recent year, they have experienced periods of rates exceeding 30% at her practice–what she called a “huge number” that she has “never seen” before.

Nationwide, the rate now hovers around 15%.

Still, according to Biss, it is difficult to determine how closely linked the miscarriage spike is to the vaccine, even though the timing is rather suspicious.

The difficulty lies in the fact that there is little data that has been collected to suggest a broader correspondence.

“I’m the only person in my practice [who] asks every patient, ‘Have you gotten a vaccine?’ ‘How many?’ ‘Which brand?’ ‘When?’ ‘Have you had COVID?’ ‘How many times?’” she said. “I’m the only one [who] asks those questions.”

She also noted that it’s hard to ask a woman who recently miscarried about such things at a particularly delicate time.

“You don’t want to ever make a woman feel like she caused her baby to not be born,” Biss concluded. “So it’s hard to get the exact data in all those patients.”