Sunday, April 20, 2025

House Passes $5.8 Trillion Budget Resolution to Make Trump Tax Cuts Permanent

(Thérèse Boudreaux, The Center Square) President Donald Trump’s tax cuts are set for permanent extension after the House narrowly passed a $5.8 trillion over ten years concurrent budget resolution that seemed poised to fail.

If the Trump tax cuts expire, as they are set to do at the end of this year, the average taxpayer will see a 22% tax hike as well as their guaranteed deduction slashed in half. The child tax credit would also reduce from $2,000 per child to $1,000 per child, The Center Square previously reported.

House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., had to postpone the Wednesday night vote after too many Republicans balked around supporting the bill, which authorizes a $5 trillion debt ceiling increase.

The 216-214 vote held Thursday morning saw only two Republicans present voting no, Reps. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., and Victoria Spartz, R-Ind.

Johnson was able to convince all other hardliners to vote yes with promises of deeper spending cuts than the bill requires.

The Senate’s amendment to the House’s $4.5 trillion budget resolution keeps the House’s savings targets — $1.5 trillion in House committee cuts — but establishes only a $4 billion savings floor for its own committees.

To do so, it changes the way the costs of extending the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act are calculated. By using a current policy baseline, which treats the extension as a continuation of current law rather than new policy, the Senate-revised resolution would theoretically subtract $3.8 trillion from the budget’s price tag.

The resolution also gives Senate committees an extra $1.5 trillion to spend and make Trump’s tax cuts permanent since it puts the costs of extension at zero.

Normally, the chambers adopt identical budget resolutions giving House and Senate committees the same savings targets before moving forward in the budget reconciliation process. But Thune and Johnson decided the quickest way to enact Trump’s priorities was by taking a two-tier approach that saves the alignment and other details for later.

Critics have called the use of current policy baseline a “gimmick.” The Congressional Budget Office has estimated the Senate’s plan will in reality add at least $37 trillion to the national debt over the next 30 years, a more than 100% increase from the current level.

The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget warned that the Senate’s plan will add at least $5.8 trillion to the federal deficit over the next ten years, costing as much as the 2017 TCJA, CARES Act, American Rescue Plan, and Bipartisan Infrastructure Law combined.

“The Senate’s excuses – that they need flexibility, that this is just a step to unlock the process, that they promise they will come up with trillions of spending cuts – don’t hold water,” CRFB President Maya McGuineas said. “And their use of the egregious ‘current policy’ gimmick should show plainly to every fiscal hawk that they have no intention of actually coming up with the savings necessary.”

Democrats are saying that the concurrent resolution necessitates future cuts to Medicaid since it requires the House Energy and Commerce Committee to find $880 billion in spending cuts.

The passage of the resolution kicks off the budget reconciliation process in earnest, as House and Senate committees will begin crafting program-specific legislation fulfilling the spending and saving requirements to enact Trump’s tax, border, and energy agenda.

Yemen’s Houthis Shoot Down Third U.S. MQ-9 Reaper Drone w/in 10 Days

(Dave DeCamp, Antiwar.comYemeni air defenses have shot down a US MQ-9 Reaper drone for the third time within 10 days as daily US airstrikes on Yemen that began on March 15 have failed to deter the Houthis or stop their attacks.

Houthi military spokesman Yahya Saree said on Wednesday that Yemeni forces were “able to shoot down an American MQ-9 drone while it was carrying out hostile missions in the airspace of Al-Jawf Governorate, using a suitable, locally manufactured missile.”

Fox News reporter Jennifer Griffin, who has sources in the Pentagon, confirmed that the drone was shot down. “This is the fourth MQ-9 Reaper drone shot down by the Houthis since March 3rd, and the fourth shot down under the Trump administration,” she wrote on X.

Griffin recently reported that the US has been bombing Yemen using heavy B-2 bombers deployed to the US base on Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean. “The US military has carried out 25 straight days of bombing, including with B-2 stealth bombers dropping bunker buster bombs, and yet the Houthis continue to fire missiles to shoot these expensive US assets down,” she said on Wednesday.

Saree said the incident marked the 18th American MQ-9 Reaper drone shot down by the Houthis since October 2023. At $30 million per MQ-9, that means $540 million worth of US drones have been lost if the Houthi number is accurate. The New York Times recently reported that the bombing campaign launched by President Trump on March 15 will soon have cost over $1 billion.

Saree also claimed more attacks on Israel and on US warships in the region and reaffirmed the Houthis would only back down if there were a ceasefire in Gaza and an end to the Israeli blockade on the country.

“The armed forces, as they fight this battle with valor, defiance, and faith, reaffirm, as they have affirmed over the past years, that great Yemen is resilient and will not back down from supporting and backing the oppressed Palestinian people,” Saree said. “It will not surrender to the American aggression, and will remain, as it was, and will always be a graveyard for invaders.”

US airstrikes continued to pound Yemen on Wednesday, with attacks reported in and around the capital, Sanaa, and in the Red Sea province of Hodeidah.Yemen’s Agriculture Ministry reported US strikes on a farm in the Dhmar province, which it condemned as a “full-fledged war crime.” Four civilians were reported wounded in the attack.

On Tuesday night, US airstrikes hit a residential building in Hodeidah. The death toll in the attack has risen, with the Yemeni Health Ministry reportingthat 10 civilians, including five women and four children, were killed.

This article originally appeared at Antiwar.com.

 

Police Exposes Black Suspect’s Motive in Fatal Stabbing of White Teen

(Luis CornelioHeadline USA) Law enforcement authorities have released the arrest report of Karmelo Anthony, the black man accused of fatally stabbing Austin Metcalf—a white college teen with a 4.0 GPA—over a seat dispute at a California track meet earlier this month. 

The report, released by the Frisco Police Department and shared Monday on X by journalist Sarah Fields, contradicts the left’s casting of Anthony as the real victim of the seat dispute on April 2. According to the report, Anthony threatened Metcalf before fatally stabbing. 

As Metcalf approached Anthony after seating in the wrong tent, Anthony “grabbed his bag, opened it and reached inside and proceeded to tell Austin, ‘Touch me and see what happens.’” 

The report noted that no one “thought Anthony really had any weapons in his bag.” When Metcalf touched him, Anthony then allegedly escalated the dispute further by challenging him to punch him. 

Shortly thereafter, Metcalf told Anthony to move again. However, the suspect produced what one witness described as a “black knife and stabbed Austin once in the chest and then ran away.” 

Metcalf pleaded for help as he was critically wounded before succumbing to his injuries. He died in the arms of his twin brother, Hunter Metcalf. Anthony now faces a charge of first-degree murder. 

Despite these stark details, Anthony’s family insists that the narrative around Metcalf’s death is “false, unjust, and harmful.” 

“As a family of faith, we are deeply grateful for all of your support during this trying period. Your prayers and assistance mean more to us now more than ever,” the family wrote in a GiveSendGo fundraiser, asking for $350,000 in donations.

Thus far, the Anthony family has collected more than $293,000.

In contrast, a GoFoundMe to pay for Metcalf’s funeral arrangement has raised more than $150,000. Find the page below.

Rep. Luna Slams DOJ for Stonewalling Epstein Files Release

(Luis CornelioHeadline USA) The DOJ allegedly continues to stonewall the Jeffrey Epstein files — even after President Trump ordered them released. Now, a GOP congresswoman wants answers. 

Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, R-Fla., said in a Monday interview with former Rep. Matt Gaetz on his eponymous OANN show that the DOJ is blocking files that could expose years of abuse by Epstein, the late financier and convicted sex offender. The FBI and other agencies allowed Epstein to operate for decades with impunity, raising questions about whether he was a government asset.

“The one thing I’ve been very frustrated with, Matt, is that I have tried very hard to obtain the Jeffrey Epstein files. I have been contacting the Department of Justice. I’ve even chased down the FBI and I keep getting the same thing: ‘We are reviewing documents,’” Luna said. 

The congresswoman criticized the DOJ for failing to release the documents at the same pace as records related to President John F. Kennedy and civil rights leader Martin Luther King Jr. 

“I’m going to continue to put pressure on the DOJ to release that information,” Luna added. “Look, there’s bad people that haven’t been charged for doing really horrible things with underage people.” 

When Gaetz asked Luna whether the DOJ has given her any timeline for the full release of the Epstein files, Luna said. “In fact, I haven’t really gotten any communication from the DOJ,” she added. 

Luna also revealed that the DOJ has stalled her criminal referrals against the mayors of four sanctuary cities—Eric Adams of New York City, Michelle Wu of Boston, Brandon Johnson of Chicago and Mike Johnston of Denver. Luna said the DOJ acknowledged receipt of the referrals but has not responded on whether they will pursue criminal charges. 

The DOJ’s slow-walk is especially surprising given Trump’s clear calls for transparency, though he has acknowledged the need for procedural steps. In March, Trump defended Attorney General Pam Bondi, who herself criticized the agency’s delays in releasing the documents.

“Well, Pam Bondi has done a phenomenal job in every respect and there could have been some holdback. I haven’t heard too much about it, but there could have been. But the bottom line is the records are getting out,” Trump said, referring to the Epstein, JFK, and MLK files. 

House Passes Bill Requiring Proof of Citizenship for Voting

(Headline USAThe House passed one of Republicans’ signature issues for the year on Thursday, approving legislation to require proof of U.S. citizenship when registering to vote for federal elections, one of President Donald Trump’s top election-related priorities.

Nearly all Democrats lined up against the bill.

Trump has long signaled a desire to change how elections are run in the U.S. and last month issued a sweeping executive order that included a citizenship requirement among other election-related changes.

Republicans argued the legislation, known as the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act, is necessary to ensure only citizens vote in U.S. elections and would cement Trump’s order into law.

U.S. Rep. Bryan Steil, a Wisconsin Republican who chairs the House committee that handles election legislation, said during Thursday’s debate that the bill is meant to “restore Americans’ confidence in our elections” and prevent noncitizens from voting.

This marks Republicans’ second attempt at passing the SAVE Act. It passed the House last year but failed in the Senate amid Democratic opposition.

It’s unlikely to fare any better this year. While Republicans won control of the Senate last fall, they have a narrow majority that falls short of the 60 votes they would need to overcome a filibuster.

Republicans hammered on the issue during last year’s presidential election

The SAVE Act would require all applicants using the federal voter registration form to provide documentary proof of citizenship in person at their local election office. Among the acceptable documents are a valid U.S. passport and a government-issued photo ID card presented alongside a certified birth certificate.

Four Democrats voted in favor of the legislation: Reps. Ed Case of Hawaii, Henry Cuellar of Texas, Jared Golden of Maine and Marie Perez of Washington.

“The truth is, those who were registered to vote would still be able to vote under their current registration,” said Rep. Chip Roy, a Texas Republican who sponsored the bill. “We have mechanisms giving the state fairly significant deference to make determinations as to how to structure the situation where an individual does have a name change, which of course is often women.”

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

Poll: Majority of American Adults Have Unfavorable View of Israel

(Dave DeCamp, Antiwar.comA new Pew survey has found that the majority of American adults — 53% — have an unfavorable view of Israel, a figure that has risen in recent years.

In March 2022, Pew conducted a similar poll that found 42% of US adults viewed Israel unfavorably. The rise in the negative view of Israel comes in the wake of Hamas’s October 7 attack and Israel’s unleashing of its genocidal war on the Gaza Strip, which Americans have been able to follow closely on social media.

Both polls showed that Democrats are more likely to have a negative view of Israel than Republicans. In the new survey, Pew found that 69% of Democrats view Israel unfavorably, while only 37% of Republicans do.

However, a negative view of Israel is much more common among younger Republicans. The poll found that 50% of Republicans aged 18-49 have a negative view of Israel, while only 23% of Republicans over 50 view Israel unfavorably.

The poll also found that 52% of American adults have little or no confidence in Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s ability to “do the right thing regarding world affairs,” while only 32% have confidence in him.

The increase of an unfavorable view of Israel among Americans could mean Israel is in trouble when it comes to long-term support from the US, and Israel’s military is extremely reliant on US assistance. A senior Israeli Air Force official said last year that without US support, the Israeli military could only sustain operations in Gaza for a few months.

This article originally appeared at Antiwar.com.

U.S. to Screen Immigrants’ Social Media for ‘Antisemitism’

(Dave DeCamp, Antiwar.comOn Wednesday, US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced that it would begin screening the social media activity of immigrants for “antisemitism” as part of the Trump administration’s broad crackdown on pro-Palestine speech.

The USCIS, which falls under the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), said it would start considering “aliens’ antisemitic activity on social media and the physical harassment of Jewish individuals as grounds for denying immigration benefit requests.”

The USCIS said it would immediately impact “aliens applying for lawful permanent resident status, foreign students, and aliens affiliated with educational institutions linked to antisemitic activity.”

The “antisemitic activity” is a reference to pro-Palestine protests on college campuses that have been labeled “antisemitic” despite the fact that Jewish students and organizations have been involved in the demonstrations.

When screening social media activity, the Trump administration is likely using a definition of antisemitism that includes criticism of Israel. In a 2019 executive order, which was referenced in the USCIS statement, President Trump directed all federal agencies to consider the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance’s (IHRA) definition of antisemitism and the organization’s list of examples of “contemporary antisemitism” when enforcing Title VI of the Civil Rights Act.

The IHRA’s examples of “contemporary antisemitism” includes “drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis.” It also lists applying “double standards” to Israel by “requiring of it a behavior not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation” and “denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination” by “claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor.”

DHS Secretary Kristi Noem is a proponent of the IHRA definition. Last year, when she was still South Dakota’s governor, she signed a bill into law that required the IHRA definition of antisemitism to be considered in investigations of unfair or discriminatory practices within the state.

Critics of the Trump administration’s announcement pointed out that even if some social media activity was considered antisemitic under a traditional definition of the word, it would still be protected speech under the First Amendment.

“As of today, DHS is making it official policy to surveil social media for ‘antisemitic’ sentiment and deport noncitizens accordingly,” Jenin Younes, a civil liberties attorney, wrote on X. “Keep in mind that the Trump Admin has re-defined antisemitism to include criticism of Israel and Zionism, but anyway true antisemitic speech, just like racist, sexist, homophobic, transphobic & Islamophobic speech is 1A protected.”

Younes added that the US government “should have no role in policing social media for such speech & punishing the speakers.”

This article originally appeared at Antiwar.com.

 

MLK Jr.’s Son Says the FBI Recordings of His Father May be Fake

(Ken Silva, Headline USA) Last month, the U.S. government filed a motion to unseal FBI surveillance records of Martin Luther King Jr.—part of what the Trump administration touted as its commitment to government transparency.

However, earlier this month, the Southern Christian Leadership Conference—the organization founded by MLK Jr.—filed a response in opposition to the Justice Department’s to unseal. The SCLC says it is worried that revelations about King’s personal affairs could be used to damage his reputation.

The SCLC may have reason to be concerned. FBI records have been released in the past that accuse King of sexual misconduct.

But according to the SCLC, some of the FBI’s recordings “may be fake.” In its April 2 reply to the DOJ’s motion to unseal, the SCLC attached a sworn declaration from MLK Jr.’s eldest son, Martin Luther King III, raising concerns about potentially doctored recordings.

“We understand that the purpose of these recordings was to discredit our father and harm the civil rights cause that he championed. Some, perhaps many, of the recordings may be fake,” King III said in his sworn declaration.

“The FBI’s purpose in creating the documents the government seeks to unseal was to misinform the public and irreparably damage our father’s reputation and most importantly destroy the civil rights movement. Such an effort against a private citizen is unprecedented,” he said.

“In fact, such surveillance has not been perpetrated even against military or elected officials, even those residing in government property. Notably, my father did not hold elected office.”

SCLC and King’s family seek a hearing to argue over whether the FBI recordings should be unsealed. The DOJ has yet to reply to their response.

The DOJ’s motion to unseal the FBI recordings was made in a lawsuit filed by King associate Bernard Lee and the Southern Christian Leadership Conference all the way back in June 1976.

The lawsuit stems from allegations that the FBI unconstitutionally monitored the conversations of King and other Conference members. In 1977, U.S. judge dismissed the lawsuit, but ordered the FBI to provide surveillance tapes and related documents to the National Archives as a “compromise.”

Those recordings and documents were sealed by court order in 1977 for 50 years, and were set to remain classified until January 31, 2027.

In its motion, the U.S. government referenced a January executive order issued by President Donald Trump. The order called for a review and release of documents connected to the assassinations of prominent figures, including MLK.

The government said it believes there is strong public interest in understanding MLK’s assassination and sufficient time has passed since the records’ creation for the government to come clean about the FBI’s role in spying on the civil rights leader.

“The Court should unseal the tapes and documents about the FBI’s surveillance and wiretapping of the Reverend King and the Conference so that the Attorney General may review them, identify any records about the assassination of the Reverend King, and release those records in compliance with the President’s executive order,” DOJ lawyers said.

Read King III’s full declaration here.

Ken Silva is the editor of Headline USA. Follow him at x.com/jd_cashless.

Gold Continued Streaming Into ETFs in March

(Mike Maharrey, Money Metals News Service) Significant amounts of gold flowed into gold ETFs for the fourth straight month in March, driving assets under management (AUM) to a new month-end record.

Funds in every region reported inflows of gold, with North American ETFs leading the way.

Globally, gold-backed funds added 92 tonnes of gold to their reserves last month. That drove total ETF holdings to 3,445 tonnes. This was the highest month-end level since May 2023 and just 470 tonnes shy of the record of 3,915 tonnes set in October 2020.

Through the first quarter, gold ETFs reported a 226-tonne increase in gold holdings totaling $24 billion. It was the second-highest quarterly increase in dollar terms.

North American funds added 67.4 tonnes of gold in March, totaling $6.5 billion. According to the World Gold Council, strong price momentum driving gold to over $3,000 an ounce, rangebound yields, a weaker dollar, tariff war uncertainty, equity pullbacks, and concern about economic growth all drove gold investment last month.

European ETFs reported inflows of 13.7 tonnes of gold in March. Funds based in the UK, Switzerland, and Germany led the way. According to the World Gold Council, “A cloudy growth outlook further weighed by U.S. tariff concerns, weak stock market performance, and the gold price surge drove demand higher in the UK.” Concerns about a massive government spending plan in Germany drove a safe haven bid there. Another European Central Bank rate cut also provided tailwinds for gold.

Gold flowed into Asian funds for the fourth straight month, with holdings increasing by 9.5 tonnes. China and Japan dominated demand in March. Rocketing gold price performance dwarfed other assets last month, sparking investor interest in gold. Inflation worries in Japan also contributed to demand. Indian-based fund reported modest outflows, likely due to profit-taking.

Funds in other regions, including Australia and Africa, report gold inflows of 1.3 tonnes.

ETFs are a convenient way for investors to play the gold market, but owning ETF shares is not the same as holding physical gold.

ETFs are relatively liquid. You can buy or sell an ETF with a couple of mouse clicks. You don’t have to worry about transporting or storing metal. In a nutshell, it allows investors to play the gold market without buying full ounces of metal at the spot price.

Since you are just buying a number in a computer, you can easily trade your ETF shares for another stock or cash whenever you want, even multiple times on the same day. Many speculative investors take advantage of this liquidity.

But while a gold ETF is a convenient way to play the price of gold on the market, you don’t actually possess any gold. You have paper. And you don’t know for sure that the fund has all the gold either, especially when the fund sees inflows. In such a scenario, there have been difficulties or delays in obtaining physical metal.


Mike Maharrey is a journalist and market analyst for Money Metals with over a decade of experience in precious metals. He holds a BS in accounting from the University of Kentucky and a BA in journalism from the University of South Florida.

Three Tips for Investors Navigating These Uncertain Times

(Mike Maharrey, Money Metals News Service) Talk about a roller coaster. After plunging for several days, stocks soared Wednesday afternoon after President Trump announced a tariff pause. The S&P 500 rocketed 9 percent, charting its third-largest single-day gain since World War II.

Gold also whipsawed, having dipped below $3,000 an ounce, the yellow metal regained much of its loss and closed over $3,100.

It’s hard to get a handle on what will happen next.

The only thing that seems certain is uncertainty.

Market volatility skyrocketed with the launch of the trade war. The VIX volatility index spiked to 57.85 on April 9. For perspective, it rose to 66 during the early days of the pandemic and 79 in October of 2008.

While the volatility index cooled somewhat after the announcement of the tariff pause, there is still plenty of uncertainty and jitteriness in the market. We’re just one announcement away from another round of market chaos.

Do you know what markets and businesses don’t like?

Uncertainty.

What Is Regime Uncertainty

We are in a period of extreme regime uncertainty. Whether you’re an investor, a business owner, or an entrepreneur, it’s extremely difficult to plan for the future under these conditions.

Regime uncertainty describes a lack of confidence in the direction of a government’s future policies regarding taxes, regulations, and, in more extreme situations, the protection of property rights and the consistent application of the rule of law.

When people become unsure about what the government will do next, or if they fear a sudden shift in rules, it discourages long-term investment and economic activity.

Regime uncertainty tends to foster “analysis paralysis.” People fixate on trying to figure out what might happen next and end up doing nothing, instead taking a “wait and see” attitude.

For instance, during the Great Depression, President Franklin D. Roosevelt created a great deal of regime uncertainty as he implemented the New Deal. Regulations and policies turned on a dime. Businesses became unsure about the federal government’s increasing intervention in the economy through price controls, taxes, labor laws, and other economic policies.

Economist Robert Higgs argued that this “regime uncertainty” prolonged the Great Depression by discouraging private investment. As he put it, “Between 1935 and 1940, this matter attained prime importance. So many businessmen and investors lost confidence in their ability to forecast the future property-rights regime that few were willing to venture their money in long-term investments.

The bottom line is that long-term economic growth depends on predictable rules. Sudden shifts in taxation, regulation, or property rights make businesses defensive.

While not rising to the level of FDR, Trump’s negotiating tactics are a breeding ground for regime uncertainty. Will the 90-day pause really last 90 days? Will exceptions be introduced? What happens in 90 days?

Nobody knows.

How do you navigate this kind of uncertainty?

If you’re running a business, especially one that relies on imports, I don’t know what to tell you.

But investors can weather this storm by keeping a few things in mind.

  1. Don’t panic. You’re going to see big swings in the market. Resist the temptation to react knee-jerk to the daily roller coaster ride. It’s easy to get caught up in emotion. Don’t.
  2. Focus on fundamentals. The trade war is happening within a broader context. Those fundamentals remain in place. We still have an inflation problem. We still have de-dollarization. We still have a lot of bubbles in the market. We still have massive amounts of debt. The laws of supply and demand remain firmly in place. It’s important to focus on the big picture and not get too caught up in the latest headline.
  3. Gold and silver are a beacon of stability. That’s not to say that the price won’t swing wildly from day to day. But gold and silver are fundamentally money. They have been money for over 5,000 years, and they will continue to be money when the trade war is a distant memory. Gold and silver are the ultimate safe haven bids. They are generally insulated from regime uncertainty because there is no counterparty risk.

There is no telling what tomorrow will bring. But you can be sure that gold and silver will still be valued and desired around the world.


Mike Maharrey is a journalist and market analyst for Money Metals with over a decade of experience in precious metals. He holds a BS in accounting from the University of Kentucky and a BA in journalism from the University of South Florida.