(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) In a scathing critique of mainstream media’s double standards, former FBI Special Agent Nicole Parker appeared on Fox News’s Fox and Friends Sunday on July 24th, blasting the media’s handling of the FD-1023 informant file in comparison to the infamous Steele Dossier.
Parker began by stating, “Full disclaimer, I have never worked on this investigation. I reviewed the document just like everybody else did on open source, and an FD-1023 is a confidential human source reporting document.” She emphasized the significance of human sources in the FBI’s work, stating they provide crucial information that may not be obtainable through other means.
“I was surprised that the 1023 ever came out. I know that it was because Congress was persistent. They are really holding the FBI director’s feet to the fire on this matter,” Parker continued. She pointed out that the FD-1023 contained explosive information but stressed that it was important to note that the information was unverified.
“The left-wing media continues to say, ‘Oh, it’s unverified,’ but I didn’t hear that during the Steele dossier. I didn’t hear a disclaimer then, but when it comes to something that is in relation to Hunter Biden, it’s unverified,” Parker remarked, highlighting the media’s inconsistent treatment of the two documents.
Thx to whistleblowers now the world can see what ive seen & what the FBI tried to conceal Serious allegations from trusted FBI source What did the FBI do to investigate???? pic.twitter.com/7Asokoc6ao
— Chuck Grassley (@ChuckGrassley) July 20, 2023
Parker also brought attention to the fact that the FD-1023 was unclassified from the beginning, unlike the Steele Dossier. “The other important piece is this is unclassified information, it was never classified,” she stated.
As she delved into the details of the FD-1023, Parker noted, “If you notice the date of the contact and the date of the report, they match.” She explained that such immediate action by the agent indicated the information’s credibility and importance.
Additionally, Parker analyzed the serial numbers in the document, observing, “The serial number is basically the document number to the file, and I noticed that the serial number is referenced serial 7 The bottom, I believe, of the second page. You go through the document, and you see now another reference to serial, I believe it was 212. Less than one year later. That means there have been over 205, documents put to that file in between that.”
