(Headline USA) The Colorado Republican Party on Wednesday appealed a state supreme court decision that found former President Donald Trump was ineligible for the presidency, the potential first step to a showdown at the nation’s highest court over the meaning of a 155-year-old constitutional provision that bans from office those who “engaged in insurrection.”
“The Colorado Supreme Court has removed the leading Republican candidate from the primary and general ballots, fundamentally changing the course of American democracy,” the party’s attorneys wrote.
The first impact of the appeal was to extend the stay of the 4-3 ruling from Colorado’s highest court. Immediately following its controversial ruling, the state court put its decision on pause until Jan. 4, the day before the state’s primary ballots were due at the printer, or until an appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court was finished. Trump himself has said he still plans to appeal the ruling to the nation’s highest court as well.
The U.S. Supreme Court has never ruled on Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, which was added after the Civil War to prevent former Confederates from returning to government. It says that anyone who swore an oath to “support” the Constitution and then “engaged in insurrection” against it cannot hold government office.
Trump has never been criminally charged with, nor convicted of, engaging in an insurrection. He was acquitted by the U.S. Senate following a partisan effort to impeach him over the Jan. 6, 2021, uprising.
The Colorado high court, nonetheless, ruled in a lawfare suit waged by the far-left Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington that the “insurrection” label applied to Trump, claiming he was the ringleader in a coordinated attack on the U.S. Capitol that was intended to stop the certification of President Joe Biden in the 2020 presidential election.
The state GOP’s filing was posted on the website of the American Center for Law and Justice—a group run by Jay Sekulow, who previously acted as one of the lead attorneys in Trump’s impeachment defense.
Colorado Republican Party chairman Dave Williams also said the appeal was filed Wednesday.
The U.S. Supreme Court is expected to take the case, either after the Colorado GOP’s appeal or Trump’s own appeal.
If Trump ends up off the ballot in Colorado, it would have minimal effect on his campaign because he doesn’t need the state, which he lost by 13 percentage points in 2020, to win the Electoral College in the presidential election. But it could open the door to courts or election officials striking him from the ballot in other must-win states.
“Unless the Colorado Supreme Court’s decision is overturned, any voter will have the power to sue to disqualify any political candidate, in Colorado or in any other jurisdiction that follows its lead,” wrote the ACLU attorneys. “This will not only distort the 2024 presidential election but will also mire courts henceforth in political controversies over nebulous accusations of insurrection.”
Sean Grimsley, an attorney for CREW, said on a legal podcast last week that he hoped the nation’s highest court would hurry once it accepted the case, as he expects it will.
“We obviously are going to ask for an extremely accelerated timeline because of all the reasons I’ve stated, we have a primary coming up on Super Tuesday and we need to know the answer,” Grimsley said.
More than a dozen states, including Colorado, are scheduled to hold primaries March 5—Super Tuesday.
To date, no other court has sided with those who have filed dozens of lawsuits to disqualify Trump under Section 3, nor has any election official been willing to remove him from the ballot unilaterally without a court order.
The Colorado case was considered the one with the greatest chance of success because all seven of the Colorado high court justices were appointed by Democrats.
However, the unprecedented constitutional questions in the case haven’t split on neatly partisan lines. Several prominent conservative legal theorists were among the most vocal advocates of disqualifying Trump under Section 3. They argued the plain meaning of the constitutional language bars him from running again, just as clearly as if he didn’t meet the document’s minimum age of 35 for the presidency.
The half-dozen plaintiffs that the George Soros-funded CREW recruited in the Colorado case all claimed to be NeverTrump Republicans or unaffiliated voters.
Trump has been scathing about the cases, calling them “election interference.” He continued that on Wednesday as he cheered a ruling earlier that day by the Michigan Supreme Court leaving him on the ballot, at least for the primary, in that state.
“The Colorado people have embarrassed our nation with what they did,” Trump said on Sean Hannity’s radio show.
Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press
