9th Circuit Rules Trump Can Activate National Guard to Protect ICE in Portland

(The Center Square) A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit on Monday overturned a temporary restraining order issued by a federal judge in Portland, Ore., removing a judicial obstruction that was preventing the Trump administration from sending Oregon National Guard troops to Portland.

“President [Donald] Trump’s September 28 deployment falls within the history and tradition of the early Militia Acts. Individuals within a group of about 200 people have engaged in violent activity in opposition to a single set of laws that carry out federal immigration enforcement. Rather than try to enact political change through the ballot box, they have assaulted the federal officers in Portland who enforce those laws and other Americans who disagree with them on the wisdom of those laws,” wrote the panel in its 93-page ruling.

The ruling comes in the wake of Trump authorizing the deployment of National Guard troops to American cities including Los Angeles, Washington D.C., and Chicago to protect the work of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents, who have been under attack in some cities.

“They tried to burn down a federal building and forced that building to close for three weeks. And sadly, regular federal law enforcement cannot on their own contain the situation. State and local officials have also made clear that they do not support the enforcement of federal immigration law, further impeding the enforcement of federal law,” noted the opinion.

As reported on Sept. 29 by The Center Square, the Trump administration called up 200 members of the Oregon National Guard after describing Portland as “war ravaged” and under the attack of Antifa.

Oregon Governor Tina Kotek and Portland Mayor Keith Wilson issued a statement Monday in response to the 9th Circuit ruling in support of Trump’s decision to call up the Oregon National Guard.

Gov. Kotek’s statement read in part:

“Oregon remains united in the fight against this unwanted, unneeded military intervention in Oregon. We will continue to show up for our neighbors, make our voices heard, and use our collective power to protect communities and our democracy.”

Mayor Wilson’s statement read in part:

“We will not stand by while federal agencies sidestep local authority. Our legal team, working with the Oregon Department of Justice, will use every lawful tool to prevent this overreach. I call on federal decision-makers to stop these deployments, honor local governance, and partner with us on real public-safety solutions that respect civil rights and protect our community.”

Rep. Dan Goldman Calls for ICE Agents to be Arrested

(The Center Square) A Democratic New York congressman is calling on the NYPD to arrest and prosecute ICE agents who engage in “unlawful actions” during federal immigration crackdowns in the city.

In letter to NYPD commissioner Jessica Tisch, U.S. Rep. Dan Goldman rips U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Customs and Border Protection officers’ “outrageous and unlawful conduct” in cities around the country, saying they have been “violently and improperly” arresting U.S. citizens.

Goldman said with the “likely possibility” that the Department of Homeland Security will “send armies of agents into New York City for civil immigration purposes” he urged the NYPD to be “prepared to strictly enforce state and local laws in order to hold federal agents accountable for any unlawful actions they engage in, including potentially through arrest and prosecution for felony violations.”

“When immigration officials make warrantless arrests of U.S. citizens or lawful residents without reasonable suspicion to believe they have violated immigration law, they are acting outside the scope of their legal authority,” he wrote.

Goldman, a lawyer who as a House counsel participated in Donald Trump’s 2019 impeachment inquiry, cited ICE’s policy barring civil immigration enforcement authority against U.S. citizens. He said news outlets have reported that federal agents “have repeatedly detained or deported American citizens in clear violation of their constitutional rights.”

“No person, regardless of their badge, should be permitted to assault or unlawfully detain any New Yorker without facing consequences,” he wrote. “In light of this failure of federal oversight, it is the responsibility of the city to uphold the rule of law and protect the public.”

There was no immediate response from the NYPD or ICE’s press office to the congressman’s letter.

New York City has been a flashpoint in the national immigration debate with more than 230,000 migrants arriving in the city between 2022 and 2024 following a surge of immigration on the U.S.-Mexico border under the previous Biden administration. ICE operations in the city have arrested nearly 29,000 undocumented immigrants, many with criminal histories, according to the agency’s website.

In July, the U.S. Department of Justice filed a lawsuit against New York City over its “sanctuary” policies that restrict cooperation with federal immigration crackdowns, accusing the city of shielding wanted criminals from deportation.

But federal immigration officials have faced criticism for aggressive immigration enforcement tactics — including violent arrests, and the use of tear gas to disperse crowds — as they detain and arrest migrants living in the United States who don’t have legal status to stay in the country.

Amid the crackdown, ICE has reported a dramatic increase in threats and acts of violence against its agents. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said last week that Mexican drug cartels have offered bounties from $2,000 to $50,000 for doxxing, kidnapping or killing ICE agents. Over the weekend, a New York man was arrested for threatening to firebomb ICE agents during a “No Kings” protest.

“Our agents are facing ambushes, drone surveillance, and death threats, all because they dare to enforce the laws passed by Congress,” Noem said last week in a statement. “We will not back down from these threats, and every criminal, terrorist, and illegal alien will face American justice.”

House Republicans Preparing Report on Biden’s Use of Autopen

(Headline USAHouse Republicans are preparing to release a report on the findings of their investigation into former President Joe Biden and what they allege is potential misuse of the presidential autopen during his term.

The report, which is likely to be released in the coming weeks, centers on claims that Biden not only visibly aged while in office, but that his mental state declined to a degree that allowed White House officials to enact policies without his knowledge.

“The House Oversight Committee has uncovered how the Biden Autopen Presidency ranks among the greatest scandals in U.S. history,” Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer, R-Ky., said in a statement. “As President Biden declined, his staff abused the autopen to carry out unauthorized executive actions. We have concluded interviews with key Biden aides and will soon report our findings to the American people.”

The Republican-led committee declined to offer instances where investigators may have heard testimony or otherwise found instances when the autopen — a mechanical device that is used to replicate a person’s authentic signature — was abused. A spokesperson for the Republican majority on the committee said the cases would be detailed in the report but offered no further details.

The committee has interviewed more than a dozen former senior Biden administration officials as part of the investigation, pressing them for information on Biden’s mental fitness while in office. Oversight Democrats have dismissed the investigation as a distraction and say the committee is turning a blind eye to wrongdoing by the Trump administration.

Biden has strenuously denied that he was unaware of his administration’s actions. He has also dismissed claims that he had mentally declined to a degree that inhibited his ability to lead as president while in office.

“Let me be clear: I made the decisions during my presidency. I made the decisions about the pardons, executive orders, legislation, and proclamations,” Biden said in a statement over the summer. “Any suggestion that I didn’t is ridiculous and false.”

What the committee heard in testimony

Some Biden officials who were subpoenaed cited their Fifth Amendment rights and declined to answer questions, including Biden’s former physician, Dr. Kevin O’Connor; Anthony Bernal, former chief of staff to first lady Jill Biden; and Annie Tomasini, a former senior adviser to Biden. Other aides spoke to the committee.

Several aides admitted that the pace of Biden’s schedule slowed over the course of his term, according to a person familiar with the private testimony who was granted anonymity to discuss it. Jeff Zients, who was chief of staff, said Biden’s decision-making slowed during the administration. Decisions that once required three meetings eventually required a fourth, he said.

Zients also discussed how to confirm the president’s mental fitness to the public. Senior officials, including O’Connor, discussed whether Biden should undergo a cognitive exam, which O’Connor said he would take into consideration.

But even as they described signs of Biden’s advancing age — he was 82 when he left office — some Biden officials also strongly pushed back on the central premise of the Republican investigation — namely that staff effectively usurped the powers of the presidency for themselves.

“There was no nefarious conspiracy of any kind among the president’s senior staff, and there was certainly no conspiracy to hide the president’s mental condition from the American people,” Steve Ricchetti, a longtime close adviser to Biden, told the committee.

Why the autopen questions matter

Biden’s age, apparent frailty in office and meandering public speeches were central to President Donald Trump and congressional Republicans’ messaging during last year’s election cycle. The Trump White House has continued to mock Biden on the issue, going so far as to post an image of the presidential autopen in place of Biden’s official portrait in a recently installed West Wing presidential portrait gallery.

But Republicans’ fixation on the presidential autopen may have broader legal implications.

Trump and Republican lawmakers have argued that improper use of the autopen would raise the possibility that scores of Biden-era executive actions, pardons and laws may be ruled invalid in court. Trump has already ordered the Justice Department to investigate.

A Trump White House memo to Attorney General Pam Bondi argued that any cases where the autopen was used without Biden’s knowledge would be an “unconstitutional wielding of the power of the presidency” that “would have implications for the legality and validity of numerous executive actions undertaken in Biden’s name.”

The argument is legally untested and may raise difficult questions for Trump’s own use of the autopen. Republican lawmakers insist that the Biden White House example was an exceptional situation.

Republicans have also argued that any former staffers found to have misused the autopen should be criminally prosecuted.

Legal experts and Democrats have called the arguments preposterous and warned that such precedents would imperil many of Trump’s own policies from both of his terms in office.

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

 

Former County GOP Chairman Accused of Kidnapping Wife

(José Niño, Headline USA) Blake Cozzens, a former chairman of the Iron County Republican Party, called a news station from jail on Saturday to deny charges that he kidnapped and abused his wife, asserting that prosecutors have overstepped in bringing the case against him. 

Cozzens, 36, reached out to FOX 13 News from Purgatory Jail in Hurricane to contest the allegations filed by Washington County, Utah prosecutors following his weekend arrest. The charges stem from an incident on July 1, 2025 when he was driving on Interstate 15 near New Harmony with his wife, Dannilyn, and their 3-year-old daughter.

Charging documents state that Cozzens became violent during the drive, with his wife beginning to film him with her phone. He allegedly took the phone and threw it into the backseat, then grabbed and twisted her wrist when she said she would call 911. 

Court documents indicate he pulled off the freeway, let his wife out of the vehicle, and drove away with their daughter before returning and forcing her back into the car despite her protests.

In his phone call from jail, Cozzens disputed this account, saying that he and his wife both struggled with each other in the car and that she asked to step out in the first place.

“I did not leave her on the side of the road; rather, I pulled ahead so traffic could go by,” Cozzens said to FOX 13.

Dannilyn maintains through her attorney that she was forced back into the vehicle. According to court documents that KUTV cited, Cozzens allegedly threatened that “they would take her daughter and deport her because she is not a U.S. Citizen.” Dannilyn Cozzens is in the United States on a spouse visa from the Philippines.

Cozzens acknowledged that another driver called 911 but said he “doesn’t know why”, per a report by FOX 13.

The arrest represents the latest legal trouble for Cozzens, who resigned from the Iron County Republican Party in 2018 after being arrested in a prostitution sting operation. 

Earlier this year, he pleaded guilty in federal court to wire fraud and bank fraud charges, admitting to defrauding victims of over $2.1 million through embezzlement from a homeowners association he managed and a scheme involving fraudulent cashier’s checks presented to Las Vegas casinos.

He was released in April 2025 after having testicular cancer removed and is awaiting sentencing scheduled for December. Federal authorities had revoked his pretrial release earlier this month based on the July domestic violence incident and a September incident at a Cedar City hotel, but he was released the following day with a monitoring bracelet.

According to William Palmer, Dannilyn’s attorney, she filed for divorce early last month, and she and her daughter are now in an undisclosed location for safety reasons.

The Washington County Attorney’s Office said it appreciates law enforcement coordination in the arrest and plans to move forward with the case. A first hearing is expected within the week.

José Niño is the deputy editor of Headline USA. Follow him at x.com/JoseAlNino 

 

Report: House Staffer Who Burned Alive Last Month Had an Affair w/ Rep. Gonzales

(Ken Silva, Headline USA) In a stunning development, the Daily Mail reported Monday that the congressional staffer who burned to death in her home last month had been having an affair with her boss, Rep. Tony Gonzales, R-Texas.

According to the Daily Mail, the staffer, Regina Aviles, 35, poured gasoline over herself before becoming engulfed in flames at her home on September 13 in Uvalde, Texas.

“Aviles and the married congressman became romantically involved after she joined his staff on November 21, 2021,” the Daily Mail reported, citing anonymous sources.

“One source told the Daily Mail that their relationship continued ‘for some time’ and that Aviles’ husband, Adrian Aviles, was aware of the relationship at the time of her death. Two additional, separate sources also confirmed the alleged relationship with Gonzales.”

The Daily Mail added that a spokesman for Rep. Gonzales “refused to deny the affair when repeatedly offered the opportunity.”

Initial reports didn’t specify how exactly Aviles died, other than by fire.

According to local Uvalde outlet KSAT, the 35-year-old staffer died after a “Saturday night incident at her home.”

“Paramedics, firefighters and police responded to Santos-Aviles’ home around 9:30 p.m. Saturday for a disturbance,” KSAT said, citing a police report.

“A close family member told KSAT Investigates Wednesday a relative called emergency services after finding Santos Aviles on fire outside of her home. The family member said Santos-Aviles was airlifted to SAMMC in San Antonio to be treated for extensive burns.”

A family member reportedly said the staffer’s death was an accident.

Santos-Aviles’s apparent LinkedIn profile says she was executive director of the Uvalde Area Chamber of Commerce until November 2021, when she left to work as the regional director for Rep. Gonzales’ office in Uvalde.

Tragically, her last words were, “I don’t want to die,” her mother reportedly said.

Ken Silva is the editor of Headline USA. Follow him at x.com/jd_cashless.

Trump Threatens Hamas With ‘Eradication’ If it Doesn’t ‘Behave’

(Dave DeCamp, Antiwar.com) President Trump said on Monday that Hamas must “behave” in Gaza or the Palestinian group would be “eradicated,” echoing similar threats he has made since the ceasefire deal was signed.

“We made a deal with Hamas that they’re going to be very good, they’re going to behave, they’re going to be nice, and if not, we’re going to eradicate them if we have to,” the president told reporters at the White House.

Trump suggested that Israel was eager to restart its genocidal war if he gave the word. “Israel would go in in two minutes if I asked them. I could tell them, ‘Go in and take care of it.’ But right now, we haven’t said that. We’re going to give it a little chance,” he said.

His comments came a day after Israel unleashed heavy airstrikes across Gaza, killing at least 45 Palestinians, after claiming IDF troops came under attack in Rafah, though some reports say the blast was caused by an Israeli vehicle running over an unexploded ordnance.

Discussing the alleged attack on Sunday, Trump suggested that if it was a Hamas operation, it was not carried out under the direction of leadership. He made similar comments on Monday, saying, “I don’t believe it was the leadership, but they have some rebellion in there among themselves.”

While Trump has not addressed Israel’s repeated attacks on Gaza, which have killed at least 80 Palestinians since the truce went into effect, he accused Hamas of being in violation of the ceasefire and warned it will “be taken care of really quickly” if Hamas does not “straighten it out themselves.”

The US has also been critical of Hamas’s clashes with other armed groups and executions of alleged Israeli collaborators and criminals. Trump previously expressed support for the executions, saying they took out “very bad” gang members, but has since threatened to “go in and kill” Hamas over the internal killings.

This article originally appeared at Antiwar.com. 

 

USAID Money Was Reportedly Siphoned to MS-13 Gang

(Ken Silva, Headline USA) At least three major media outlets have recently reported that public funds from the now-defunct U.S. Agency for International Development were diverted to the El Salvadoran gang, La Mara Salvatrucha, more commonly known as MS-13.

ProPublica first reported the bombshell revelation in early June, citing sources who alleged that El Salvador President Nayib Bukele struck a secret pact with MS-13—agreeing to provide the gang with money and power in exchange for votes and reduced homicide rates. Some of that money allegedly came from USAID.

According to ProPublica, the Joint Task Force Vulcan, a multiagency law enforcement team created during the first Trump administration to investigate MS-13, suspected in 2021 that top El Salvadorian officials were diverting USAID funds to gang members.

“Money was going from us, from USAID, through to this social fabric group,” a former federal law enforcement official reportedly said. “They’re supposed to be building things and getting skills and learning. It was funding the gangs.”

ProPublica’s scoop was followed up later in June by the New York Times, which reported similar facts.

“[Carlos] Marroquín, a close aide to Mr. Bukele, was suspected of funneling to MS-13 resources from the U.S. Agency for International Development that were coordinated on the ground by a Salvadoran aid program he ran called Tejido Social,” the Times reported on June 30, citing three people familiar with the case.

“The aid, which financed community centers outfitted with libraries, computers and other amenities, was believed to have been directed to MS-13 neighborhoods as incentives for gang leaders to cooperate.”

The Times added that USAID terminated its contract with Tejido Social once it learned of the allegations in late 2021.

When shuttering USAID earlier this year, the Trump administration cited numerous instances of waste, fraud and abuse in the agency. However, officials have been silent on USAID funding MS-13 activity—even though it seems to have occurred under the Biden administration.

The Times and ProPublica’s reporting suggests that the Trump administration hasn’t gone after El Salvador’s government because they have a deal with President Bukele to deport criminals to the country’s maximum-security prison

On Saturday, the Washington Post reported that the Trump administration has even agreed to send back confidential informants from MS-13, who’ve provided the Justice Department with information about the gang’s links to Bukele. Like the Times and ProPublica, the Post also reported that USAID money was suspected of having gone to MS-13.

“The deal would give Bukele possession of individuals who threatened to expose the alleged deals his government made with MS-13 to help achieve El Salvador’s historic drop in violence,” the Post reported, citing anonymous officials.

According to the Post, the U.S. has deported one alleged informant, while at least two others are still in the country.

“One of them — César López Larios, whom U.S. prosecutors charged last year with directing MS-13’s activities in the United States — was sent back to El Salvador … The others remain in the United States, waiting to learn whether they, too, will be handed over to the very government they were cooperating against,” the Post reported.

Ken Silva is the editor of Headline USA. Follow him at x.com/jd_cashless.

Poll: Kamala Harris Still Democratic Favorite for 2028

(Morgan Sweeney, The Center Square) Former vice president and 2024 presidential candidate Kamala Harris leads Democratic contenders for 2028, according to a new poll.

The Center Square Voters’ Voice Poll, conducted by Noble Predictive Insights, surveyed 2,565 registered voters from Oct. 2-6, 2025, via opt-in online panel and text-to-web cell phone messages. Only those who identified as Democrat (948 of those surveyed) or Independent (199) were asked to choose who to among top Democratic contenders.

Of the eight Democratic names listed in the poll, Harris had the support of 33% of Democrats and 27% of Independents surveyed. California Gov. Gavin Newsom trailed with 13% support among Democrats and 3% among Independents. Seventeen percent of those surveyed indicated they weren’t sure who they’d pick if a Democratic primary were held that day.

New York U.S. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez placed a distant third, netting 8% of both Democratic and Independent support, and former U.S. Secretary of Transportation Pete Buttigieg followed with 7% among both groups.

Harris cleanly swept nearly all demographic groups surveyed, polling strongest among Black, Southern and young voters. She captured 54% of Black support, 40% support of those who live in the South, 44% of those ages 18 to 29, and 42% of those ages 30 to 44. She was also twice as popular as Newsom with women and people with a household income under $50,000 (36% to his 18%).

Newsom managed to capture two demographics from Harris: Americans who live in the West and those ages 65 and older. Newsom snagged 30% support in the West to Harris’ 25%, and 29% support from older Americans to Harris’ 18%. He and the former vice president were neck-and-neck among white and college-educated respondents and those with a household income of at least $100,000, with Newsom trailing by just one or two percentage points.

Ocasio-Cortez was the second-most popular choice among 18- to 29-year-olds, securing 15% support to Newsom’s 12%. 

Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro and Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker tied for fifth among the Democrats listed, each earning 4% support. Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer followed with 3% and Maryland Gov. Wes Moore, with 1%. 

The Center Square partnered with independent market research firm Noble Predictive Insights to survey Democratic and Independent voters from Oct. 2-6 through online and SMS survey.

Republican State Senator Facing Intoxicated Driving Charges

(Alan Wooten, The Center Square) With a blood alcohol content level 0.16, or twice the intoxication minimum for charge by law, Republican state Sen. Norman Sanderson of Pamlico County was arrested in North Carolina’s capital city on Saturday evening.

The arrest was at Edwards Mill Road and Trinity Road, a major intersection adjacent to the where the North Carolina State Fair is ongoing at the Fairgrounds. It is also adjacent to the Carter-Finley Stadium football home of the N.C. State Wolfpack, and the Lenovo Center arena that houses the NHL Carolina Hurricanes, the Wolfpack basketball team, and major concert attractions.

Sanderson’s arrest was by the State Highway Patrol. In addition to the blood alcohol content level, he’s charged with failing to obey a traffic officer and having an open container of alcohol. He posted $2,000 bond and has a Nov. 7 court date.

State law prohibits blood alcohol content level of 0.08% for drivers over 21; 0.04% for commercial drivers; and 0.02% for drivers under 21. Even if below 0.08%, drivers can still be charged for driving while impaired if lawmen suspect someone to be “appreciably impaired” by alcohol or other substances.

Sanderson is in his seventh two-year term in the upper chamber and served one in the House of Representatives prior to that. He represents District 2 along the coast, with constituents in Pamlico, Carteret, Chowan, Halifax, Hyde, Martin, Warren and Washington counties.

In published comments Sunday through the state Republican caucus, Sanderson said, “Last night I made a regrettable mistake, and I take responsibility for my actions. I want to apologize to my constituents, my colleagues and my family for letting them down. I commend the State Highway Patrol and the Wake County Sheriff’s Office for their professionalism during the incident.”

The Hurricanes are on their regular West Coast swing while the State Fair takes place, and a Hip Hop Legends concert at Lenovo had been canceled. Wolfpack football played at Pitt on Saturday.

Supreme Court to Consider Drug User Gun Possession Case

(Andrew Rice, The Center Square) The U.S. Supreme Court agreed on Monday to hear a case regarding whether regular drug users can possess firearms

The case, United States v. Hemani, challenges whether federal statutes barring a person who “is an unlawful user of or addicted to any controlled substance” violates the Second Amendment. 

The case centers on a Texas man who was charged with a felony when FBI agents found a pistol, marijuana and cocaine in his home after obtaining a search warrant, a petition to the court read. 

The Trump administration petitioned the high court to hear the case after a lower court struck down the law barring people who use drugs such as marijuana from possessing firearms. 

The Trump administration argued that regular drug users can simply stop their use to regain access to firearms under the law. 

“By disqualifying only habitual users of illegal drugs from possessing firearms, the statute imposes a limited, inherently temporary restriction—one which the individual can remove at any time simply by ceasing his unlawful drug use,” the Trump administration’s petition reads.