Sen. Urges Trump to Stop Saudi Tankers from Unloading Their Crude in U.S.

‘This is the American energy producers’ Pearl Harbor…’

(Michael Barnes, Liberty Headlines) Oil prices plummeted to below zero on Monday amid the Wuhan virus-driven economic shutdown and the ruthless oversupply of crude oil from Saudi Arabia.

In response, Sen. Kevin Cramer, R-N.D., urged President Donald Trump to stop all Saudi tankers from further unloading oil in the United States.

Cramer tweeted that the Arab sultanate was responsible for flooding the market, driving the price down while devastating America’s own industry during an already dire time.

Ironically, while lower gas prices are generally a boon for helping drive commerce, the current statewide shelter orders in most areas mean few can take advantage of them.

Historically, the U.S. has been beholden to the oil-rich nation for its energy supply, but the oil independence achieved during the Trump administration has resulted in a more fraught relationship, with greater scrutiny on its alleged human-rights abuses.

The Saudi strategy involves increasing its global market share by selling cheap oil and crushing U.S. competition by making financial losses unsustainable.

Worse, Saudi Arabia is selling cheap oil to U.S. companies.

“Shame on companies for rewarding bad behavior by taking this crude as US oil producers suffer,” said Cramer.

In 2018, the United States became the world’s largest oil exporter thanks in no small part to the shale revolution in Cramer’s home state of North Dakota. But as the Wuhan virus slowdown hit the U.S., Saudi Arabia and Russia ramped up oil production in an aggressive attempt to cripple American oil producers.

In January, Saudi Arabia increased its oil output by seven-times its January 2019 production total. Then, Saudi exports to the U.S. more than doubled from February to March, according to TankerTrackers.com.

On Monday afternoon, U.S. oil futures sunk well-below zero to negative $37 per barrel.

Now, the Persian Gulf oil hegemon is sending a flotilla of 20 supertankers loaded with tens of millions of barrels of oil to ports in Louisiana and Texas.

“This is the American energy producers’ Pearl Harbor,” said Kirk Edwards, president of West Texas oil company Latigo Petroleum LLC, in the Wall Street Journal on Friday.

“We know the ships are coming in, and yet nobody is doing anything about it,” Edwards said. “Every barrel they’re bringing in on those ships backs out a barrel of oil produced here in the Permian Basin.”

Sen. Cramer Says Renewable Energy Destabilizes Electric Grid, Urgent Action Needed
Kevin Cramer/Photo by Gage Skidmore (CC)

Cramer says he has a solution to the economic war flotilla.

For over a month he’s been clamoring for President Trump to use “232 authority” of the Trade Expansion Act to embargo oil imports from Saudi Arabia, Russia, and other oil- and petroleum-exporting nations like Iraq.

“The U.S. has a long history of taking action against oil market manipulations by state actors,” Cramer wrote on March 18. “While I support continued dialogue, I believe it is critical to take action now to avoid substantial domestic layoffs, displacement, and financial impacts.”

More recently, Cramer raised the issue of tariffs, saying, “the Kingdom cannot flood the market then expect us to fix it.”

Low prices have been “extremely brutal” for North Dakota’s oil industry, according to the state’s petroleum council.

Many companies have cut workers’ hours and layoffs are expected to compound the existing economic devastation wrought by the Wuhan virus shutdown.

On Tuesday afternoon, Kramer said he was working with other lawmakers to prevent banks from seizing oil and gas companies in North Dakota that have fallen behind on loans.

Grassley Demands Answers from Puerto Rican Gov. about Ongoing Corruption

Public emergency funding ‘passes through a filter of political connections…’

Grassley Demands Answers From Corrupt Puerto Rican Officials
Wanda Vázquez / IMAGE: Miami Herald via Youtube

(Claire Russel, Liberty Headlines) Puerto Rico’s officials must answer for their continued fiscal management as the island struggles to fight the coronavirus, said Senate Finance Committee Chairman Charles Grassley, R-Iowa.

The last four years has been marked by “possible malfeasance by the [Puerto Rican] government” whenever it is given financial aid, Grassley said in a letter to Puerto Rican Gov. Wanda Vázquez. The coronavirus is just the latest example of this malfeasance.

In his letter, Grassley asked Vázquez to explain what happened to the $40 million worth of contracts the island entered into to buy testing kits for COVID-19.

These contracts were reportedly canceled after the government had put down $20 million, and now it is being reported that the companies the island contracted “have no experience in the medical supply industry,” Grassley said.

The island has also “been plagued by a recent wave of resignations of key health officials,” said Grassley.

Vázquez’s predecessor, former Gov. Ricardo Rosselló, was among the top political officials ensnared by the series of corruption scandals exposed last year, as were authorities from the Federal Emergency Management Agency who were arrested on counts of bribery.

As a result of these continued resignations and the Puerto Rican government’s inability to secure the proper testing kits, the island was woefully unprepared for the coronavirus pandemic—but not for a lack of federal funding.

Indeed, the Trump administration “significantly increased funding for Puerto Rico’s health system” so that the island would be prepared, Grassley said.

Yet there is still a complete lack of “accountability, stability, and contracting processes in Puerto Rico’s government,” he added.

On top of corruption issues, mismanagement of  federal emergency funds and supplies has become a pattern with Puerto Rican officials, Grassley pointed out.

After Hurricane Maria, officials were caught hoarding federal supplies and withholding them from citizens in need. And prominent government officials on the island have repeatedly. In response, President Donald Trump has been hesitant to provide Puerto Rico with further assistance.

It is clear, given these recent examples, that the federal aid intended for Puerto Rico’s citizens “passes through a filter of political connections” before these resources actually reach the people of Puerto Rico, Grassley said.

Declassified Footnotes Prove Schiff Complicit in FBI/Russian Smear Campaign

‘Until yesterday’s release, it was hard to 100% disprove Schiff’s memo just from the FISA itself…’

(Ben Sellers, Liberty Headlines) Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., was caught in another blatant lie after recently declassified footnotes from an inspector general’s probe showed that language from an FBI surveillance application was ripped almost verbatim from the debunked Steele Dossier.

Despite having access to the unredacted version of the documents in question, Schiff deceptively stated in a 2018 memo that the FBI had “narrowly” relied on the Steele Dossier in its warrant applications to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court.

Predictably, left-wing media shills like Vox claimed Schiff’s memo, a rebuttal to one by Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif., had shredded the case for FBI misconduct outlined by House Republican leaders.

But the disclosures last week by the Justice Department proved that Schiff—then the ranking minority member on the House Intelligence Committee—would have been able to spot the close similarities in the language, according to investigative journalist John W. Huber.

The unredacted footnotes also showed partisan FBI investigators, led by then-counterintelligence chief Bill Priestap and agent Peter Strzok, were aware that former British spy Christopher Steele was deeply involved in a Russian disinformation campaign to smear President Donald Trump.

Moreover, the agents knew that Steele—whose opposition-research was commissioned by top Democrats including the Hillary Clinton campaign—had overtly lied about being the source behind a Yahoo News article smearing the president in September 2016, according to American Greatness.

Although Steele had been dismissed as an FBI intelligence source for shopping his so-called research to left-wing media, the bureau continued to receive his dispatches via the Fusion GPS firm using backdoor channels.

The FBI then relied heavily—if not exclusively—on the information provided by Steele in four different FISA requests to spy on the Trump campaign.

Schiff—who led the impeachment probe and prosecution against Trump over an unrelated Ukraine affair—was also complicit in the FBI cover-up and, thus, in the Russian disinformation campaign.

He and many other Democrats used the false accusations against Trump for fundraising and campaigning during the 2018 midterm elections, which allowed Democrats to reclaim the House majority and elevated Schiff into the Intel Committee chairmanship.

 1
Adam Schiff / IMAGE: CSPAN via Youtube

However, his position as steward of some of the country’s most sensitive secrets has not kept Schiff from overtly partisan maneuvers, often including lies that have been readily and objectively exposed.

Among several bold misstatements during his Ukraine investigation, Schiff offered a dramatic reading of the transcript outlining a call between Trump and Ukraine leader Volodymyr Zelenskiy that falsely seemed to suggest a Mafia-style shakedown.

Schiff has also capitalized on the secrecy of the committee’s work by using selective leaks and—it seems—selective omissions to provide a misleading narrative.

During the impeachment hearings, he was able to weaponize the whistleblower process, for instance, to prevent information that undermined his case from being publicly disclosed.

Schiff repeatedly denied knowledge of the so-called whistleblower’s identity—presumed to be former CIA analyst Eric Ciaramella—despite having previously acknowledged that his office had communicated with the whistleblower.

In fact, evidence suggests that Schiff likely helped to instigate the whistleblower complaint, working closely with Ciaramella and former Intelligence Community Inspector General Michael Atkinson to ensure that the process was airtight.

Prior to the Ukraine impeachment effort, Schiff also had claimed he had irrefutable “evidence in plain sight” of Trump’s collusion with Russia that would result in the president’s impeachment and possible prosecution.

But as with the recent FISA revelations, his claim was disproved in due time when the Mueller Report presented no such evidence.

What is now clear: Schiff was, indeed, gazing at evidence in plain sight that involved Russian collusion and election interference. But he, not Trump, was the beneficiary of it.

WHO Continues as China Mouthpiece; Insists COVID Not from Wuhan Lab

‘As we said early on, there is no way this virus came from us…’

Republican Rep. Introduces Bill to Defund World Health Organization
Tedros Ghebreyesus / IMAGE: Guardian News via Youtube

(Claire Russel, Liberty Headlines) The World Health Organization claimed there is no evidence the coronavirus originated in China’s Wuhan lab, despite multiple reports that suggest otherwise.

Last week, the Washington Post reported that the State Department had been sent two warnings a couple of years ago about China’s Wuhan research facility, which was studying different strains of the coronavirus.

This lab lacked the proper equipment and safety protocols, according to two cables sent to State Department officials from U.S. scientists who had visited the lab.

The first cable sent back to the U.S. warned that “the lab’s work on bat coronaviruses and their potential human transmission represented a risk of a new SARS-like pandemic,” according to the Post’s Josh Rogin.

Yet the WHO continues to insist, without providing evidence, that “the virus has an animal origin and was not manipulated or constructed in a lab or somewhere else,” said WHO spokeswoman Fadela Chaib, according to Reuters.

Chaib couldn’t provide an explanation for how the virus was transmitted from animals to humans, but added that there was “certainly” an animal host at one point.

China has also claimed the coronavirus did not originate in its Wuhan lab, slamming as a “conspiracy theory” the growing questions about the virus’s origin.

“As people who carry out viral study, we clearly know what kind of research is going on in the institute and how the institute manages viruses and samples,” said Yuan Zhiming, vice director fo the Wuhan Institute of Virology. “As we said early on, there is no way this virus came from us.”

This isn’t the first time the WHO has taken China’s side.

The WHO also repeated Chinese claims that the virus could not spread via human-to-human contact, and has reported China’s coronavirus death numbers as fact, despite testimonies from Wuhan residents that suggest the death count is much higher.

Because of this, President Donald Trump announced last week that the U.S. will stop funding the United Nations-backed organization, pending an investigation into what the WHO knew about the coronavirus, and when, and why it has cozied up to the Chinese Communist Party’s talking points over the past month.

“The reality is that the WHO failed to adequately obtain, vet, and share information in a timely and transparent fashion,” Trump said, adding that U.S. officials will conduct a review “to assess the World Health Organization’s role in severely mismanaging and covering up the spread of the coronavirus.”

Characteristically, Hollywood and others on the Left have responded by rallying around WHO, including a high-profile televised benefit to raise funds for the beleaguered propaganda outlet.

BIDEN: I’d Pick Michelle Obama as VP ‘In a Heartbeat’

She ‘has an incredible soft spot for Joe…’

 1
Michelle Obama / IMAGE: NJ.com via Youtube

(Claire Russel, Liberty Headlines) Presidential candidate Joe Biden said he’d pick former First Lady Michelle Obama as his running mate “in a heartbeat.”

Biden’s campaign is reportedly trying to recruit Obama to lend him star power, but he reiterated past claims that he doesn’t think she’s interested in playing a prominent role.

“She’s brilliant. She knows the way around. She is a really fine woman. The Obamas are great friends,” Biden told Pittsburgh’s KDKA. “But I don’t think she has any desire to live near the White House again.”

The Obamas’ current home in Washington, DC’s posh Kalorama neighborhood is a full 1.9 miles from the White House.

Biden added that he hasn’t yet decided who his vice president pick will be, but he reaffirmed that he’s committed to choosing a female—though he didn’t commit to choosing a woman of color.

“I’ll commit that it will be a woman because it is very important that my administration look like the public, look like the nation,” Biden said. “And there will be a woman of color on the Supreme Court—that doesn’t mean there won’t be a vice president, as well.”

Biden is reportedly considering failed Georgia gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams, Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, and former presidential candidate Amy Klobuchar, but some Democrats have hinted that Biden might tap Obama instead.

“She may not like politics, but also Donald Trump has dissembled everything her husband tried to accomplish,” said Dick Harpootlian, the former Democratic Party chairman of South Carolina. “If she engages, God help Donald Trump, because she’s tough as nails and enormously popular.”

Some conservatives, including radio host Rush Limbaugh, have long postulated as much, intimating that Obama’s adamant denials of her political ambitions are belied by her behind-the-scenes moves.

The Obamas have, in fact, operated below the radar to secure a juggernaut of campaign infrastructure, free political programming on platforms like Netflix and PBS, and a massive amount of super-PAC funding to contribute (indirectly) to the cash-strapped Biden operation.

Theories were already present that Michelle Obama might be the benefactor of a brokered convention should Sen. Bernie Sanders have remained in the race.

But speculation, including a recent New York Post article, has since turned to the possibility that Biden—who appears to be declining cognitively at a steady clip—might immediately step aside if elected, declaring himself unfit to execute the duties of the office.

“It is convoluted. It is dark. It is depressing. But it sounds like everything in this idea could actually happen,” Limbaugh said on his show Monday.

As of right now, Michelle Obama has publicly agreed only to help Biden’s campaign roll out a plan to increase voter registration, according to The Hill.

She “has an incredible soft spot for Joe,” said a source close to the Obama family, but that friendship likely won’t be enough to convince her to step into the spotlight on his behalf, the source added.

Liberty Headlines’ Ben Sellers contributed to this report.

Sen. Pleads w/ Justice Dept. to Keep Bernie Madoff in Prison Amid COVID Releases

‘It is imperative the Federal Bureau of Prisons strongly considers the financial, emotional and physical devastation that some inmates have caused…’

SEN. KENNEDY: Some Dems Have No Soul, Mothers Didn't Breast-Feed Them
John Kennedy/IMAGE: Fox News

(Michael Barnes, Liberty Headlines) District attorneys, mayors and governors are using the Wuhan coronavirus as a reason to deploy radical left-wing criminal-justice policies across the country.

But Sen. John Kennedy, R-La., is asking the nation’s top criminal justice official to draw the line at the worst fraudsters in American history.

City officials in Baltimore and Philadelphia have suspended arresting violent criminals.

Cleveland has released hundreds of prisoners from jail.

Virginia has reduced its statewide jail population by 17 percent in just the past few weeks.

And New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio’s inmate-release policies have even freed ex-Trump attorney Michael Cohen, who worked with House Democrats after being indicted by the Mueller investigation for lying to Congress.

All in the name of public safety.

Now, Kennedy wants Attorney General William Barr to make sure Bernie Madoff, Robert Allen Stanford and the worst-of-the-worst non-violent felons who qualify for Wuhan virus prison-release programs stay behind bars.

“I respectfully urge you to deny any request for early release made by Robert Allen Stanford, Bernie Madoff, and others who chose to devastate innocent Americans with their fraudulent schemes,” he wrote in a letter to Barr on Monday.

Kennedy said Madoff and Stanford “preyed on the elderly” and should be the last ones to benefit from COVID-19 prison releases.

“It is imperative the Federal Bureau of Prisons strongly considers the financial, emotional and physical devastation that some inmates have caused by their crimes,” he wrote.

Madoff pleaded guilty in 2009 to perpetrating the largest Ponzi scheme in U.S. history. For years, he lived a lavish billionaire’s lifestyle in New York City while posing as a Wall Street investment guru. In reality, he stole billions from middle-class investors.

The scandal wiped-out the life savings of families and retired people when the fraud came crashing down, which may have contributed to even greater suffering in the wake of a 2008 recession.

Madoff was sentenced to 150 years in prison and $170 billion in restitution. But he may soon walk out of prison after serving only 10 years.

Robert Allen Stanford was convicted in 2012 of the second biggest investment-fraud scheme, ripping off more than 18,000 people of an estimated $8 billion. Stanford was sentenced to 110 years in prison, but like Madoff, he may soon return home.

Kennedy urged Barr to deny the early releases and redirect coronavirus assistance efforts to those who deserve it.

“Our efforts should be focused on protecting those who protected us; our parents, grandparents, and military veterans who led crime-free lives,” said Kennedy.

Lib Media Use False Flag—Literally—to Bash ‘Nazi’ Trump for Protest Support

‘This … flag is all you need to know about the pro-Trump open Michigan rally today…’

Lib Media Deploy Hoaxes, Hyperbole to Claim Trump a 'Nazi' for Protest Support
A likely anti-Trump protester unfurls a swastika during an Idaho rally in March. Many false, left-wing news reports claimed that the flag was present during a Michigan rally against oppressive government coronavirus orders. / IMAGE: Twitter

(Ben Sellers, Liberty Headlines) Left-wing media operatives fell back on their first line of offense last week while attempting to neutralize freedom-fighting protesters—by implying that they were Nazis and white supremacists, among other things.

However, several of their lines of attack subsequently proved to be either greatly exaggerated or outright false, turning the lens back, instead, on the true oppressors.

High-profile protests in Michigan, Virginia and several key battleground states prompted President Donald Trump to offer praise for the civil disobedience, encouraging citizens to “liberate” the states from radical leftist governors.

In response, conspiracy theorists in the liberal press attempted to link the movements to everything from anti-vaxxers to Republican campaign cabals to—of course—Russia.

No evidence exists that the uprisings comprised anything more than loosely organized gatherings that communicated primarily via Facebook groups and other social media.

However, those groups have seen a massive, organic growth in their numbers since states began implementing their draconian and unconstitutional quarantine policies in response to the coronavirus panic.

False Flags

Most in the media picked up on the presence of a Confederate flag during recent protests.

It is commonplace, however, for left-wing operatives to plant demonstrators in right-wing rallies as part of an effort to foment violence and divert attention.

Another debunked line of attack underscored the point, falsely claiming there was a Nazi flag present at the Michigan rally.

Reporters questioning Trump later promulgated the false report about the Nazi flag, attempting to pass it off as fact. However, the “fact-check” site Snopes acknowledged that the flag was likely unfurled by an anti-Trump demonstrator at an Idaho event a month earlier.

The same person was also photographed holding signs in support of then-candidate Bernie Sanders, whose socialist advocacy more closely aligned with the political foundations of Adolf Hitler’s National Socialist Party.

COVID: the New Holocaust

The HuffPost loosely compared modern-day coronavirus contrarians with the German Nazis responsible killing millions of innocent victims during the Holocaust,

Unfortunately, the leftist site’s phony number-crunching undermined its claims and exposed the true political agenda behind them.

Like others, it sought to link Trump’s support of the recent nonviolent rallies to the violent 2017 clash between Antifa and neo-Nazi groups in Charlottesville, Virginia.

Without missing a beat, it suggested that the social-distancing scofflaws were also responsible, like the Nazis, for the murder of innocents.

“In the United States, at least 40,666 people have died from COVID-19, the disease caused by the virus, with nearly 760,000 confirmed cases, according to data compiled by Johns Hopkins University,

“The death toll in the U.S. is almost twice as high as Spain’s, the country with the world’s second-most virus-related deaths,” she continued.

Given the population disparities, though, that also proved to be a brazenly misleading exaggeration.

In terms of the number of deaths per confirmed cases, the U.S. mortality rate is roughly half that of Spain and remains significantly below the global average, even as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have recently sought to inflate the numbers by counting “probable” coronavirus-related deaths.

The Double-Standard Continues

While many in the leftist media have continued to harp on the reckless conduct of people exercising their constitutional rights to protest against those who are trying to take away those very rights, there seemed to be little widespread media condemnation over residents of New York City, the US epicenter for the disease, who continued to disregard social-distancing rules for far less noble reasons.

It remained unclear how outlets like the HuffPost planned to report on a Brooklyn rave in which more than 60 people were cited for cramming into a barber shop last Thursday.

Zuckerberg: Facebook Censors Those Who Challenge ‘Social Distancing’

‘We have to let nature do what otherwise the vaccine would do and that is create people who are immune…’

Liberals OUTRAGED Over Zuckerberg's GOP Charm Offensive
Mark Zuckerberg / IMAGE: Guardian News via Youtube

(Michael Barnes, Liberty Headlines) Facebook founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg said on Monday that he will censor anyone guilty of spreading “harmful misinformation” about the Wuhan coronavirus on the world’s largest social media platform.

That includes those who deviate from harsh governmental social distancing policies.

The problem, however, is that a number of medical experts advocate for “herd immunity” over social distancing.

The idea is that the quickest and most effective path to overcoming the virus, in the absence of a vaccine, is not avoidance but exposure.

The practice of exposure is common with childhood diseases such as chickenpox, but even without intentional exposure, those who experience asymptomatic, mild or nonlethal cases may develop resistance.

Some, in fact, have argued that a significant portion of the asymptomatic population may already have encountered the virus and accumulated the necessary antibodies without requiring treatment.

Zuckerberg intimated that such information will either be banned or come with a warning label.

ABC News chief anchor George Stephanopoulos raised the issue during an exclusive interview on Good Morning America.

Stephanopoulos prompted the exchange in response to the growing number of protests around the country demanding that dictatorial blue-state governors restore constitutional rights and begin to work toward reopening the economy.

After Stephanopoulos — a former official in the Bill Clinton administration and longtime ally of the political family — claimed the protests were responsible for helping spread misinformation about herd immunity, Zuckerberg vowed to censor it on Facebook—and, by extension, silence alternative opinions to social distancing.

“There’s an awful lot of bad information out there,” Stephanopoulos said.

“How do you deal with the fact that Facebook is now being used to organize a lot of these protests to defy social distancing guidelines?” he asked. “If someone is trying to organize something like that, does that qualify as harmful misinformation?”

“Certainly, someone saying that that social distancing is not effective to stop the spread of coronavirus, we do classify that as harmful misinformation and we take that down immediately,” said Zuckerberg.

But more and more, health experts are talking about the necessity of herd immunity and the limits of social distancing.

Dr. Fauci Pushes Back on Democrats' Accusations Against Trump: 'He Has Always Listened to What I've Said'
Anthony Fauci / IMAGE: Face the Nation via Youtube

Anthony Fauci, director of the NIH’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, is a strong supporter of social distancing, but even he has acknowledged the benefits of herd immunity.

“The people who are infected, there is no doubt … that if you recover from an infection, you have an immunity that will protect you with the same particular pathogen, in this case, the coronavirus,” he told CNN.

Ironically, it’s social distancing that is preventing the country from achieving the herd immunity threshold needed to eradicate the virus and save lives, and that’s a bill that has to be paid, according to David Katz, the founding director of the Yale–Griffin Prevention Research Center.

Katz told Fox News host Mark Levin that while social distancing has helped mitigate the spread of the coronavirus thus far, once people venture outside again the infections will increase until herd immunity is achieved. Essentially, social distancing is delaying the inevitable, he said.

“That’s what will happen if you lock everybody away from everybody else and kind of wait until things get better and then let everybody out into the world,” said Katz.

“The virus is still out there,” he added. “We don’t have antibodies. We’ll just get it later.”

Knut Wittkowski, a former biostatistician at Rockefeller University, is taking an even stronger approach. Wittkowski is sounding the alarm online about the trappings of social distancing and may soon become a high-profile victim of Facebook’s new censorship policy.

He’s a leading online advocate against social distancing and has gained notoriety for saying schools should be reopened as a way to ensure enough people are exposed to the virus to achieve herd immunity.

“We have to let nature do what otherwise the vaccine would do and that is create people who are immune because they went through a very mild form of the disease,” he said.

Wittkowski has been negatively targeted by media “fact-check” groups and Facebook is relying on similar groups to implement its censorship policies. In his ABC interview, Zuckerberg assured Stephanopoulos that the fact-checkers will be “independent.”

A YouTube interview titled, “Perspectives on the Pandemic,” features Wittkowski and his view that “social distancing and lockdown is the absolutely worst way to deal with an airborne respiratory virus.”

The 41-minute video has gone viral across multiple social media platforms and has garnered more than 1.1 million Youtube views over the past two weeks.

The top viewer comment says, “The more I learn, the less I worry about this virus but I worry WAY MORE about our government.”

Pro-Life Christians Sue City of Charlotte for Unlawful Arrest During Protest

‘It was about the government silencing people because it doesn’t like their point of view…’

Alliance Defending Freedom May Sue Charlotte for Arrest of Pro-Life Volunteers
David Bentham / IMAGE: screenshot via Facebook

(Claire Russel, Liberty Headlines) A group of pro-life protesters filed a lawsuit against the city of Charlotte on Saturday after law enforcement officials wrongly “targeted” and arrested them earlier this month.

Charlotte–Mecklenburg police officers arrested eight pro-life Christians on April 4, claiming the protesters were violating the state’s social-distancing guidelines, intended to slow the spread of the coronavirus pandemic.

The protest, however, was peaceful and socially distant, according to David Benham, the president of Cities4Life.

The protesters washed their hands regularly and were mindful of the required 6-foot physical distance, Benham explained.

All the protesters wanted to do was to gather outside of the abortion clinic, walk and pray, he said in his lawsuit against the city, according to the Alliance Defending Freedom, which is representing Benham and Cities4Life.

“It makes no sense that someone can walk or ride a bike down a sidewalk, but a person can’t walk and pray there,” Benham said.

“It makes no sense that an abortion business can stay open to offer purely elective abortions during the COVID-19 pandemic but social service charity volunteers can’t pray and offer material support outside while obeying the emergency order and proclamation.”

These arrests weren’t about keeping the citizens of Charlotte safe, said ADF attorney Kevin Theriot.

“It was about the government silencing people because it doesn’t like their point of view,” Theriot said in a statement.

Benham accused the Charlotte–Mecklenburg police of violating his constitutional rights by arresting him while ignoring other members of the public who were enjoying the outdoors.

“While the abortion clinic began filling up with clients and numerous people roamed the parks and sidewalks for recreation and exercise, government officials targeted the selfless individuals from Cities4Life, who were praying on the sidewalk, maintaining a safe distance from one-another and others, and helping women interested in the important charitable services they offered,” the lawsuit states, according to the Charlotte Observer.

Benham is asking the court to issue a permanent injunction preventing the city from taking action against future pro-life protests, and to award monetary damages for the violation of Cities4Life’s rights.

Left Likens Trump’s ‘Very Fine People’ Quote to His Praise for COVID Protesters

‘This Confederate FLAG next to Trump 2020 flag is all you need to know about the pro-Trump open Michigan rally today…’

(Ben Sellers, Liberty Headlines) As backlash against autocratic state governors threatened the Left’s dreams of an indefinite economic shutdown, Trump-bashing media sought to link his support for protesters to prior comments about the “very fine people” at a deadly 2017 rally in Charlottesville, Virginia.

The mainstream media’s predictable, knee-jerk response began after demonstrators marched on several state capitols last week in probable swing states like Michigan, Ohio, North Carolina and Virginia.

President Donald Trump, for his part, relished the efforts of freedom-loving individuals to assert their constitutional rights against blue-state leaders who have sniped at him over his federal response to the coronavirus outbreak.

A White House adviser, Stephen Moore, even likened the protesters to civil-rights icon Rosa Parks, to which Trump responded that “some of the governors have gotten carried away.”

Leftist media countered by tossing around words like “insurrection,” suggesting that the president was trying to use coded dog-whistle language to activate a legion of Manchurian-candidate followers to engage in an armed uprising.

Pressed on his support for the demonstrations, Trump pointed to the First Amendment, indicating that the government may not abridge the right of people to peaceably protest.

“You’re allowed to protest,” Trump said, according to the HuffPo. “… I watched a protest and they were all 6 feet apart, I mean it was a very orderly group of people.”

Riffing on Trump’s praise for the social-distancing scofflaws, many on the fringe Left trotted out the Charlottesville trope.

The leftist HuffPo was among those that invoked the 2017 “Unite the Right” rally, in which far-right extremists clashed with radical leftist Antifa forces.

 1
Charlottesville/IMAGE: Journalism 101 via Youtube

“Trump’s enabling response to the protesters echoed his handling of the 2017 Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville, Virginia—where neo-Nazis protested against taking down Confederate monuments in a violent white supremacist rally that left one counter-protester dead and dozens injured,” said HuffPo writer 

“After the Charlottesville violence, Trump refused to single out the activity of white supremacists and instead falsely claimed that there was ‘bigotry and violence on many sides,'” she continued, falsely refuting Trump’s assertion, despite reams of supporting evidence documenting left-wing violence and bigotry.

Although the recent demonstrations were not violent—likely due to the fact that leftists counter-demonstrators were unable to leave their homes—some noted the presence of a Confederate flag as evidence of racial underpinnings.