Thursday, June 4, 2026

Inspector Gen. Refers Comey for Prosecution; DOJ Declines to Do So

‘Comey entered the FBI chief’s job with a reputation for excellence but ran a bureau that suffered from ineptitude, political shenanigans, leaking and significant human failings…’

Justice Deparment Let Mueller Be Special Counsel Despite 'Conflict of Interest'
Robert Mueller, James Comey and Barack Obama / IMAGE: The Obama White House via Youtube

(Ben Sellers, Liberty Headlines) Despite the ongoing efforts of Democrats like Reps. Jerrold Nadler, D-NY, and Adam Schiff, D-Calif, to keep the Mueller investigation on life-support, much attention has now shifted to the Department of Justice investigations into possible collusion on the Left.

The first domino to fall in the DOJ probes of the scandal’s origin—including the discredited Steele Dossier and the FBI’s use of it to warrant spying on the Trump campaign—may be former FBI Director James Comey, as reported in a recent op-ed from The Hill penned by investigative journalist John Solomon.

DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz this week referred Comey for prosecution to Attorney General William Barr‘s office over the disgraced director’s role in leaking sensitive information, indirectly, to the media, both before and after his May 2017 firing by President Donald Trump.

However, prosecutors declined to pursue the charges due to a lack of compelling evidence to establish illegal intent.

The DOJ did not want to “make its first case against the Russia investigators with such thin margins and look petty and vindictive,” according to Solomon’s sources.

An official in the IG’s office, citing its policy of refusing to confirm or deny the existence of investigations, declined to comment on questions from Liberty Headlines.

A similar case against former FBI counterintelligence chief Peter Strzok—a key player in the bureau’s investigations of both Trump and his opponent, Hillary Clinton—was earlier declined by DOJ prosecutors despite finding evidence of illegal leaking.

Comey is widely known to have kept memos of classified conversations with Trump and relayed them to the press with the express intent of triggering a special-counsel investigation in Congress.

That investigation—led by Comey’s close friend and former boss, Robert Mueller—which ran nearly two years and cost an estimated $35 million, ultimately found no evidence of conspiracy or obstruction from the president.

But according to Solomon and his sources, the soon-to-conclude IG’s investigation is expected to disclose several findings that will, at the very least, raise major questions about Comey’s ethics and judgment while leading the nation’s top investigative agency.

A release of public documents to transparency and accountability watchdog Judicial Watch earlier this week revealed that FBI agents were sent to Comey’s home to retrieve the purloined memos and scrub them of sensitive information but that two still remained unaccounted for.

“These extraordinary FBI docs further confirm that James Comey should never have had FBI files on President Trump at his home and that the FBI failed to secure and protect these private and classified files,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton in a press statement.

“Mr. Comey’s illegal leaking these FBI files as part of his vendetta against President Trump (directly resulting in the corrupt appointment of Robert Mueller) ought to be the subject of a criminal investigation.”

Regardless of the recent decisions not to prosecute Comey and Strzok for their leaking, there is reason to believe that the IG referrals may be prelude to a much bigger case being built against the corrupt FBI officials.

“There are significant issues emerging with how the FISA was handled and other conduct in the investigation, and everyone involved remains under scrutiny,” an anonymous source told Solomon.

In addition to the IG investigation, special prosecutor John Durham has been working closely with Horowitz’s office on its own investigation.

Durham’s appointment came not long after Barr riled Democrats during an appearance before the Senate Appropriations Committee by using the word “spying” to refer to the FBI conduct.

“I think spying did occur,” Barr said. “The question is, was it was adequately predicated? I’m not saying it wasn’t.”

Barr confirmed at the time that he was proceeding with the investigation.

“I am reviewing the conduct of the investigation and trying to get my arms around all the aspects of the counterintelligence investigation that was conducted during the summer of 2016,” Barr told the committee.

President Donald Trump also took the step of declassifying many of the documents related to the FBI’s investigation into the Russia conspiracy hoax.

As Solomon concluded, “the IG report, at least, reaffirms what has become painfully clear to Americans the past two years: Comey entered the FBI chief’s job with a reputation for excellence but ran a bureau that suffered from ineptitude, political shenanigans, leaking and significant human failings.”

On Thursday, in response to a tweet from Rep. Mark Meadows, R-NC, a close Trump ally and head of the Freedom Caucus, Comey weighed in with his spin on the latest developments.

GOP Sen. Overreaches w/ Gov’t Attempt to Cure Social Media ‘Addiction’

‘Too much of the ‘innovation’ in this space is designed not to create better products, but to capture more attention by using psychological tricks…’

GOP Sen. Aims to Break Online Addiction w/ Bans on Snap Streaks, Infinite Scrolling 2
LoboStudioHamburg (CC) via Flickr

(Ben Sellers, Liberty Headlines) A new bill being pitched in the Senate could change the way people interact with sites like Facebook, Twitter and the teen-popular Snapchat.

While its aim is to help empower users to break free of their social media addictions, some fear that the overreaching legislation could create a cure worse than the disease.

Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., introduced the legislation, which he hoped would help curb the manipulative practices tech companies have developed to keep users logged on.

“Big tech has embraced a business model of addiction,” Hawley said in a press statement on Tuesday.

“Too much of the ‘innovation’ in this space is designed not to create better products, but to capture more attention by using psychological tricks that make it difficult to look away,” he said.

Among the regulations contained in Hawley’s Social Media Addiction Reduction Technology (SMART) Act would be an end to infinite-scrolling interfaces and auto-playing videos.

The bill also proposes a ban on rewards-based features like “streaks,” popular on the photo-sharing Snapchat app, which offer users a special badge for continuously engaging with others.

The proposed legislation additionally would force sites to include tools that track how long users are online with timers and pop-up notifications.

However, some—such as free-market advocate Shoshana Weismann—worry that the proposals go too far in micromanaging or restricting online behavior.

“Unfortunately, policymakers are too confident that simply throwing more government at the problems—whatever those may be—will fix them, and are proposing a number of solutions that are well-intended but largely ill-conceived,” Weismann wrote in an article recently published by technology journal The New Atlantis.

The new regulations might have widespread implications beyond the practices of leading social media sites, instead empowering the Federal Trade Commission and state attorneys general to target or shut down any website, simply for encouraging user-engagement.

“[O]perators of innumerable websites collect personal data, and many of them probably wouldn’t realize that the legislation might apply to them,” Weismann wrote about an earlier piece of similar legislation proposed in the Senate. “In fact, it is not even clear which cases this legislation would apply to.”

Moreover, what some see as unsavory trade practices, others may argue is simply a reflection of the networks’ success in appealing to users, calling into question the government’s authority to regulate time they spend scrolling.

In a tweet thread criticizing Hawley’s new bill, Weissmann argued that social media was a form of entertainment and not a necessity that warranted government intervention.

She also criticized the overly invasive legislation for delving into clearly personal areas like online dating services.

Hawley, however, said the aim was simply to give users more of a choice in the face of the “obstacles” that the sites put up to prevent people from unplugging.

“Social media is sold to us as a way to connect with distant friends and relatives,” he said in his press release. “But tech giants don’t stop there. They design platforms with a bottom-line goal in mind: Capture as much of our attention as possible and immediately sell that attention to advertisers.”

In support of his proposals, Hawley noted that over the past seven years there has been a 56 percent increase in the time users spend on social networks, up from an hour and 22 minutes in 2012 to two hours and eight minutes currently, according to a 2018 report from GlobalWebIndex.

GOP Senate Candidate Takes on Google as Attorney General
Josh Hawley/IMAGE: Fox Business via YouTube

Moreover, networks such as Snapchat and video-sharing platform TikTok are often targeted toward younger audiences who are unprepared to make informed choices about their social-media usage—leaving them vulnerable to threats like surreptitious data mining and online predators.

“Social media companies deploy a host of tactics designed to manipulate users in ways that undermine their well-being,” said Josh Golin, executive director of Campaign for a Commercial-Free Childhood.

“We commend Senator Hawley for introducing legislation that would prohibit some of the most exploitative tactics, including those frequently deployed on children and teens,” Golin said.

The bill’s proposal comes on the heels of a recent Pew Research Center survey that revealed, nationwide, a decline in perceptions and attitudes about social networks.

Only half of Americans now see them as having a positive impact, while a third of Americans see a predominately negative impact.

The companies also face increasing scrutiny and regulation on a variety of fronts—including accusations from conservatives, such as Sen. Ted Cruz, that they have engaged in blatantly biased practices to suppress and censor dissenting voices.

The companies themselves claim it is merely an effort to maintain their subjective community standards, block hate speech and preserve election integrity.

As with political censorship, critics of Hawley’s proposal said any efforts to rein in the way users interact with social media would lead lawmakers down a slippery slope.

CNN ‘Gotcha’ Attempt Makes Fraudulent Comparison Between Baltimore & Ala.

‘CNN’s hyper-partisan, anti-Trump motivation blinded them to the truth…’

(Ben Sellers, Liberty Headlines) As many in the public seemed to agree with President Donald Trump’s assessment of Baltimore as a “rat infested” hell-hole, far-left mouthpiece CNN was obliged to shift its strategy from weepy-eyed indignation to finger-pointing deflection.

On Tuesday, correspondent John Berman used the dying outrage over Trump’s attack last week on Rep. Elijah Cummings, D-Md.—in which he criticized the House Oversight chair for ignoring his own district—to springboard to an entirely different region, the Tennessee Valley of Alabama.

Berman directed his snipe at Rep. Mo Brooks, R-Ala., an outspoken member of the House Armed Services Committee and a supporter of the president’s agenda.

“Democrats aren’t the only members of Congress who represent districts of distress,” Berman said, while interviewing Republican Party Chair Ronna McDaniel. “Mo Brooks, who represents Alabama-05, right, they have a median household income which is less than Maryland-07, where Elijah Cummings represents.”

Berman continued his inapropos attack on Brooks: “[S]o, Mo Brooks spends a lot of his time defending the president, why should he do that by your logic and not go home and deal with the issues in your district?” he asked McDaniel.

It turned out, however, that Brooks was more than happy to field that question himself, issuing a well-sourced take-down of CNN’s claims while defending his district with statistics of his own.

“Fake News CNN and John Berman get an ‘F’ for failing to do their homework,” Brooks said in a press release issued by his office. “If they had, they would know the Tennessee Valley is experiencing what may very well be the best economic boom in our prosperous history.”

He said the network’s attack was “mean spirited and just plain dumb” while failing to account for the vastly different costs of living that impact quality of life in the two regions.

“CNN’s hyper-partisan, anti-Trump motivation blinded them to the truth,” Brooks said.

Congress Members on Mueller Investigation: ENOUGH!
Mo Brooks/IMAGE: YouTube

He noted that, with the booming economy, his district’s greatest concerns were finding enough workers to fill high-paying jobs and the need for additional infrastructure to accommodate those flocking to the area.

‘If the rest of the country is as economically ‘distressed’ as the Tennessee Valley is, we should consider electing Donald Trump president for life!’ Brooks said.

After running down a litany of recent accolades from publications ranking Huntsville, Ala., as one of the best and most affordable places to live, Brooks noted that Baltimore—despite its close proximity to Washington, D.C., and many to natural and historic attractions—was in active decline due to mismanagement.

Brooks said the Maryland city has double the unemployment and murder rates of Huntsville and that its population numbers are falling. Meanwhile, the cost of living there is 25 percent higher than in northern Alabama.

“Baltimore (which has been governed by Democrats for decades) is a very ‘challenging’ place to live,” Brooks said. “That’s why Baltimore residents are smartly fleeing it.”

New Cuomo Law in NY Forbids Schools from Arming Teachers

‘While the federal government turns its back on gun violence and prevention, we’re committed to preventing tragedies and saving lives…’

NY Gov Cuomo to Sue Fed Govt over Zero Tolerance Immigration Policy
Andrew Cuomo (screen shot: CNBC/Youtube)

(Ben Sellers, Liberty Headlines) From late-term abortions to resisting federal immigration authorities to trying to force the release of President Donald Trump’s state taxes, New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo has been on the forefront recently of passing spiteful legislation to make a point to the White House.

Cuomo’s latest grandstanding spectacle was a law that would prevent schools in the state from arming teachers, even though none were clamoring to do so.

In the wake of a California shooting that left three victims dead at a garlic festival, Cuomo’s effort rather seemed a pre-emptive bid to defuse any practical solutions to gun violence that did not fall in line with his far left agenda: a de facto repeal of the Second Amendment.

“The answer to the gun violence epidemic plaguing this country has never been and never will be more guns,” Cuomo said in a statement released Wednesday by his office, “and today we’re expanding New York’s nation-leading gun safety laws to further protect our children.”

In addition to preventing teachers from arming to protect their classrooms, Cuomo touted a second piece of legislation that would establish state police procedures for “the Safe Removal of Illegal, Unsecured, Abandoned or Unwanted Firearms,” intended to uniformly regulate gun-buyback programs throughout the state.

The bills take effect immediately.

“These measures will help slow the proliferation of guns by keeping unneeded firearms out of school zones and helping to ensure unwanted or illegal guns don’t fall into dangerous hands,” Cuomo said.

In a companion statement, Lt. Gov. Kathy Hochul got more to the point.

While the federal government turns its back on gun violence and prevention, we’re committed to preventing tragedies and saving lives,” she said.

The pair of laws follow three earlier anti-gun laws signed this year, including a controversial “red flag” law that authorizes authorities to confiscate the weapons of anyone they deem to “show signs of being a threat to themselves or others.”

Critics have expressed alarm that the vague and subjective phrasing could offer a blanket protection for corrupt authorities to violate the constitutional rights of citizens.

Cuomo’s other laws extended the waiting period for background checks, reinforced a federal ban on bumpstocks enacted last year by Trump, banned “undetectable” guns (such as those made from plastic using 3-d printers) and imposed new requirements on the safe storage of firearms.

The regulations are all part of what Cuomo has labeled his “Justice Agenda” in the first 100 days of the state’s legislative session. An accompanying slogan says “No time to wait.”

Not all of the Empire State’s aggressive anti-gun laws have been successful.

In May, fearing that the Supreme Court would overturn a law that attempted to limit licensed gun owners from taking their guns outside the city, officials scrambled at the last minute to repeal the law in order to render moot an unfavorable decision.

De Blasio Says Dems Only ‘Occasionally’ Respectful of Black Women

‘I say there’s plenty of money in this world, and there’s plenty of money in this country. It’s just in the wrong hands…’

 1
Bill de Blasio / IMAGE: screenshot via Essence.com

(Ben Sellers, Liberty Headlines) According to New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio, one particular set of left-leaning voters needs to be held above the rest.

“I want to say, as a Democrat, all black women should be praised and appreciated for being the backbone of this party, for being the difference makers, and this is the year where I think that’s going to come into full focus,” de Blasio said during a recent interview at the Essence Festival in New Orleans.

“Democrats need to not pay lip service and not be occasional—occasionally respectful of black women but every single day,” he said in the Essence interview, published Thursday.

De Blasio may have been trying to score points with his wife, who is black, by addressing the group as the Democratic Party’s “No. 1 voting base,” or perhaps he was simply pandering to the lifestyle magazine’s target readership demographic.

“In so many ways, black women have been disrespected in our society when, in fact, they need to be put on a pedestal to thank them for the contributions they make,” he said.

But in a race that includes an actual black-identifying woman, Sen. Kamala Harris of California, as one of the front-running candidates, it is no surprise that de Blasio remains mired in the gutter.

While directing his appeal at a very narrow niche of Americans, de Blasio’s popular support has topped out at 1 percent in most polls, and he has been begging for $1 donations in order to meet the threshold of 130,000 donors to qualify for the third set of debates in September.

As far as outlining his actual agenda, de Blasio hoped to cast himself as a left-wing populist in contrast with the elitist faction of his party.

“I am very concerned—I wanna make this point bluntly on the political level—the Democratic Party, to too many Americans, to too many African Americans, to too many Americans of all backgrounds, doesn’t always seem like the party of working people,” he told Essence.

“It doesn’t always seem like it’s on the side of the everyday person who’s struggling to make ends meet—and that’s the vast majority of Americans,” he said.

While conservative populists like President Donald Trump have sought to appeal to working-class Americans by promising to “drain the swamp,” de Blasio said that the country needed more government, not less, to enact a massive wealth re-distribution program.

“In New York we put that in reverse,” he said. “We show that you can actually put money back in the hands of working people.”

He pointed to his past policies, including “free” healthcare and pre-school, which he claimed helped right the wrongs of systemic racism and economic disparity.

“These are the kinds of things that go at those structural problems,” he said, “that help folks, particularly in underserved communities, to have not only real possibility, real opportunity, but to have hope.”

Of course, some may beg to differ, he noted.

“There’s a lot of folks who are doing very well who would like to keep things the way they are,” de Blasio said.

“There’s a lot of folks who say—when you talk about investing in everyday people—they say, ‘There’s not enough money, we can’t afford that.’ And I’m very blunt about that,” he continued. “I say there’s plenty of money in this world, and there’s plenty of money in this country. It’s just in the wrong hands.”

De Blasio also came out strongly in favor of the controversial Green New Deal, referring to global warming as “the existential threat.”

He said New York already had begun to implement many of its eco-conscious proposals, such as retrofitting old buildings, promoting electric cars and setting requirements for renewable energy.

However, some have pointed to the strain on the electric grid due to New York’s demanding “green friendly” policies as the prime reason for the city’s massive recent blackouts.

De Blasio continues to face harsh criticism from many those who work with him.

On Monday, New York’s former chief of police, Louis Anemone, sharply savaged the mayor’s “disgraceful” anti-law-enforcement rhetoric and policies, which he said posed a danger to officers, following a spate of water-throwing incidents.

Trump also weighed in last week, attacking de Blasio for his encouragement of the disrespectful conduct.

Meanwhile, members of de Blasio’s own staff in New York’s City Hall have dismissed his presidential run as a vanity project and criticized the mayor’s constant absenteeism.

But despite the derision, he continues to tout his record on the 2020 presidential campaign trail.

“What I have been doing as mayor of New York City is what I want to do as president, which is to recognize we need a redistribution in this country, and we need to be honest about it,” de Blasio said.

NFL Player to Keep Kneeling in Protest for Upcoming Season

‘We’ve got to keep fighting. Got to keep agitating…’

NFL Won't Sign Anthem Protester; Says He'll Kneel No More
Eric Reid & Colin Kaepernick/IMAGE: YouTube

(Ben Sellers, Liberty Headlines) With the NFL season just a month away, the controversy over players kneeling during the national anthem will return for its fourth season—if Carolina Panthers safety Eric Reid has any say.

Sports Illustrated reported that Reid would continue his protest, which he began alongside former quarterback Colin Kaepernick when both played for the San Francisco 49ers.

Reid has continued the vaguely race-related protest since joining the Panthers last season under far-left owner David Tepper.

“If a day comes that I feel like we’ve addressed those issues, and our people aren’t being discriminated against or being killed over traffic violations, then I’ll decide it’s time to stop protesting,” Reid told the Charlotte Observer. “I haven’t seen that happen.”

The statement echoed past comments the Louisiana native has made—including, most notably, in a New York Times op-ed published in September 2017, where he outlined his rationale for the unpatriotic act.

Reid said he still saw an urgency to deliver the message, which he hoped would put political heat on lawmakers to take some kind of action.

“We’ve got to keep fighting,” Reid added. “Got to keep agitating. Got to keep making sure that we put pressure on the people who make the laws, and the decisions, in this country.”

It remained unclear, however, what sort of resolution would be enough to satisfy the kneelers. On the contrary, Reid said he thought progress seemed to be sliding in reverse of late.

“It feels like we’re going backwards,” Reid said. “You’d like to think we’re past certain things, the way we treat people. I thought we were at a time where you love your neighbor as yourself. But as I’ve studied history—it hasn’t repeated itself necessarily, but it’s dressed a little different and is acting the same.”

He did not comment on whether the divisiveness of his protest may have contributed to the compounding malaise.

Kaepernick, who was benched as the starting signal-caller during the 2016 season, did not renew his contract the following year. Since then, he has remained an unsigned free agent, with an increasingly unlikely chance of returning to the NFL.

However, he has only gained in exposure—and wealth—after scoring a highly lucrative contract as a pitchman for Nike.

He most recently ignited scandal anew by insisting that the apparel giant pull a line of shoes featuring the American “Betsy Ross” flag from its original colonial days, claiming the flag carried racist connotations.

Kaepernick and Reid also settled a lawsuit against the NFL in which they accused team owners of discrimination and collusion for their apparent blacklisting—even after Reid landed a new team.

Other high-profile athletes have since joined in the kneeling effort, such as women’s soccer player Megan Rapinoe, an LGBT activist and vocal critic of President Donald Trump, who praised Reid and his team during a recent visit to Charlotte.

“Shoutout to the Carolina Panthers for a) seeing Eric Reid’s talent and b) not only supporting his right to do that but really putting their full weight behind that,” she said. “I’m a big Panthers fan now.”

RAND PAUL: ‘I’m Willing to Contribute’ to Ilhan Omar’s Ticket to Somalia

‘She can look and maybe learn a little bit about the disaster that is Somalia…’

 1
Rand Paul / IMAGE: Fox News via Youtube

(Ben Sellers, Liberty Headlines) Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., has been known to break ranks with President Donald Trump and congressional Republicans on many issues, such as  budget spending and executive authority.

But he stood firm with the president recently amid Democratic accusations of racism—and even raised the stakes on Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn.—after Trump declared that she and other anti-American congresswomen ought to “go back” to the countries they pledged allegiance to.

Paul said Omar—a Somali refugee who became an American citizen—might appreciate her adoptive country more by getting a better understanding of what she left behind as a child.

“I’m willing to contribute to buy her a ticket to go visit Somalia,” he told Breitbart News last week during Turning Point USA’s annual Teen Student Action Summit in Washington, DC.

“And I think she can look and maybe learn a little bit about the disaster that is Somalia—that has no capitalism, has no God-given rights guaranteed in a constitution, and has about seven different tribes that have been fighting each other for the last 40 years,” Paul continued.

Paul told Breitbart he had encountered many people who had endured oppressive governments under communist regimes and that they expressed their gratitude at having escaped the despotic systems.

“I’ve met people who have come here from behind the Iron Curtain—they got away from communism,” Paul said. “They’re some of the best Americans we have, because they really appreciate how great our country is, and then I hear Rep. Omar say America is a terrible place.”

He said Omar’s own personal story belied her frequent rhetoric that the U.S. is hostile to immigrants and people of color.

“Well, she came here and we fed her, we clothed her, she got welfare, she got [schooling], she got healthcare, and then, lo and behold, she has the honor of actually winning a seat in Congress, and she says we’re a terrible country?” Paul said. “I think that’s about as ungrateful as you can get.”

Trump made his offending tweets two weeks ago following the attacks from members of “The Squad”—four socialist-leaning freshman House members backed by the Justice Democrats—that included Rep. Alexandria Ocasio–Cortez‘s comparison of border detention facilities to Nazi concentration camps and Rep. Rashida Tlaib‘s declaration, on her first day in Congress, that she was “gonna impeach the motherf***er.”

Of the four, only Omar—most notorious for her anti-Semitic remarks and her comments downplaying the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks—is known to have been born outside the U.S.

Tlaib, nonetheless, identifies closely with her Palestinian heritage, and Ocasio–Cortez’s family moved to New York from the U.S. territory of Puerto Rico, whose governor resigned last week while plagued by accusations of corruption.

Following the tweets, Trump incurred further wrath when, during a North Carolina rally, his supporters initiated a chant of “Send her back” in reference to Omar.

He also riled the Left by criticizing the district of Rep. Elijah Cummings, D-Md., which includes much of majority-black Baltimore, calling it “rat-infested.”

Subsequent tweets by the president showed footage from the district strewn with garbage and riddled with crime.

Omar embraced her status as a “victim” of the GOP bullying by saying that it was insufficient for Trump opponents simply to disapprove of the comments, but that they must take action.

“It is not enough to condemn Mr. Trump’s racism,”she wrote in an op-ed for The New York Times. “We must affirmatively confront racist policies.”

She then proceeded to outline several economic and social programs, such as increasing the minimum wage and allowing open borders, that would, in fact, exacerbate many of the problems faced by lower-income Americans and minorities.

Michael Moore Reveals Dems’ Two Secrets to Winning 2020 Race

‘You don’t want safe right now. … We need a street fighter…’

(Ben Sellers, Liberty Headlines) Rabid left-wing movie director Michael Moore on Thursday launched one of his most piercing and offensive attacks yet on the supporters of President Donald Trump: He compared them to him.

Moore visited “Late Night with Seth Meyers,” where he also offered insights for left-wingers into winning next year’s election that largely borrowed from Republicans’ own playbook.

Moore’s appearance came a day after he made headlines and was retweeted by the president over his criticism of former special counsel Robert Mueller‘s congressional testimony.

The guest and host compared notes on the respective insults each had received from Trump, with Meyers saying he had been called marble-mouthed and Moore boasting about his presidential nickname, “Sloppy Mike.”

But the overweight provocateur managed to land a low blow in return by implying that Trump’s legions of deplorables comprised a less-than-desirable demographic.

“He’s a little afraid to come completely at me because, essentially, I’m his base,” Moore said. “I’m an angry white guy over the age of 50, and I have a high-school education.”

While most high schools require some sort of a basic civics course to issue their diplomas, though, Moore seemed to lack that while engaging in a discussion about impeaching the president.

Fortunately his rant made up in animated gesticulation for what it lacked in basic knowledge.

“I don’t know what’s wrong with the Democrats—for history’s sake, for the children, you have to say ‘this is wrong,’ presidents cannot break the law,” Moore said. “And yes, I know that what everybody says is, ‘Well yeah but the Senate…’ The Senate doesn’t impeach.”

Although impeachment, by definition, is the act of arraigning a president or other figure on formal charges within the legislative body, it does not presuppose guilt or even bear the burden of evidence.

The only thing preventing the Democratic majority in the House from doing so would be the political consequences they would face from a wasteful and polarizing partisan spectacle.

Several Democrats have, in fact, already attempted unsuccessfully in this congressional session to file articles of impeachment against the president.

Much like his faux documentaries, Moore preferred his own definition of impeachment to a traditional textbook one that was rooted in facts.

“Impeach is only done by the House, and it means that your behavior has caused us to impeach you, and now we’ll send it to the Senate for trial,” he offered astutely.

He likened the first step toward removing the president to a losing team playing a better team in a baseball series.

“The Detroit Tigers do not say, ‘I don’t want to go to New York and play the Yankees. We’re just gonna lose,” Moore said.

“You know? ‘Let’s not do impeachment cause we’ll lose in the Senate and we’re Democrats and our feelings get hurt…'” he continued. “No. We need to fight. We have to fight, fight, fight.”

2020 Visions?

Michael Moore Reveals Democrats' Two Secrets to Winning 2020 Race
‘Sloppy’ Michael Moore / IMAGE: Late Night with Seth Meyers via Youtube

While the hope of impeachment seemed to be dimming for many Democrats, Moore did propose two shrewd strategies for retaking the White House next year—both of which he stole from winning Republican strategies.

He said, first and foremost, that Democrats had to do a better job of energizing their base by running a “beloved” candidate who could tap into the energy of Barack Obama’s campaigns, but who could also go toe-to-toe with Trump.

“You don’t want safe right now. You’ve gotta fight Trump with whatever our version of—he’s a street fighter,” Moore said. “We need a street fighter. That’s the only way you’re gonna defeat him.”

Moore said he also was encouraging party leaders to take a page from the playbook of former President George W. Bush and his campaign advisor, Karl Rove.

Like the Bush campaign—which successfully got ballot referendums against gay marriage in 14 states—Moore said his home state of Michigan in 2018 had managed a blue sweep of major offices by getting voters to turn out for measures legalizing marijuana and banning gerrymandering.

“Instead of putting all our hopes in one politician to carry the thing we have to get these ballot proposals on in the swing states that will bring out people to vote,” he said.

Moore said it was crucial that Democratic operatives work to secure ballot initiatives that would pander to traditionally left-leaning demographics of women, minorities and young voters.

“We all have to agree, we’re gonna all vote for the person that isn’t just gonna beat Trump—cause I think there’s four or five candidates now that could beat him—but beating isn’t good enough,” Moore said. “Hillary beat him. We have to crush Trump. It has to be orange crush.”

ESPN Caves on Trump-Bashing Radio Host Dan Le Batard’s ‘No Politics’ Violation

‘Not surprisingly, some commentators just aren’t able to abide by such a mandate…’

Sportscaster Ignores ESPN's 'No Politics' Rule to Vent on Trump Tweets
Dan Le Batard / IMAGE: The Dan Le Batard Show via Youtube

(Ben Sellers, Liberty Headlines) ESPN, the virtue-signaling one-time sports network run by the far-left Disney corporation, has again capitulated to one of its Trump-bashing on-air personalities, despite extensive market research telling them to steer clear of politics.

The New York Post reported that radio show host Dan Le Batard—after a temper-tantrum last week over President Donald Trump’s political attacks on several far-left freshman congresswomen—had met with ESPN President Jimmy Pitaro and would return to the air.

Although neither party would comment publicly, the Post reported that the two “were on the same page following the meeting.”

Le Batard, whose salary is estimated to be around $3.5 million, last week broke the network’s recently implemented policy of disallowing political commentary unless it had a direct relation to sports.

Following a rally last week in North Carolina, where MAGA supporters initiated a “Send her back” chant in reference to Trump adversary Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., the Miami-based ESPN analyst not only took direct aim at the president but also criticized his own network for its “cowardly” policy.

Pitaro—who took over the top job at the network in May 2018—had a role in revising the policy after controversial remarks by former “SportsCenter” anchor Jemele Hill turned off many of the network’s loyal viewers.

“Without question, our data tells us our fans do not want us to cover politics,” Pitaro said upon taking over, according to USA Today.

“My job is to provide clarity,” he said. “I really believe that some of our talent was confused on what was expected of them. If you fast-forward to today, I don’t believe they are confused.”

Even after tweeting that Trump was a “white supremacist”—prompting the U.S. president to call for her removal—and encouraging NFL fans to boycott the Dallas Cowboys over their anti-kneeling policy, Hill kept her job under a reported $10-million, four-year contract.

But unable to recover from the polarizing remarks—and showing little interest in doing so—she ultimately left in September 2018, with Pitaro arranging for her to be paid out for the remaining two years of her contract.

Now writing for The Atlantic, Hill weighed in defending Le Batard over his diatribe and claiming it was the mark of true “journalism.”

Jemele Hill Tweets About a Trump Assassination
Jemele Hill / IMAGE: Late Night with Seth Meyers via Youtube

“[T]he executives often seem more concerned with placating some white fans than respecting the fact that so many men and women of color are profoundly appalled by the Trump administration’s policies and the president’s hurtful rhetoric,” said the race-baiting Hill in an op-ed Thursday.

“Besides, while ESPN isn’t a purely journalistic operation—it’s partly in the entertainment business too—it does practice journalism,” she continued. “And that means there are times when the audience has to be challenged to think critically, rather than appeased.”

Contrary to Hill’s claims, many of those in the field of journalism draw a sharp distinction between objective reporting and opinion-based punditry or activism.

In Hill’s world, however, the true victims are the television personalities whose lucrative compensation packages hardly qualify as a just inducement to stay off their soapboxes.

“ESPN’s policy also backs the network itself into a corner, and asks TV and radio commentators to do something impossible: ignore anything and everything happening outside the four corners of the playing field, no matter how much it offends their basic sense of humanity,” she said. “Not surprisingly, some commentators just aren’t able to abide by such a mandate.”

Anti-Death-Penalty Dems Show Absurd Solidarity w/ Child Rapists, Torturers and Racists

‘The Trump administration has chosen to join North Korea’s Kim Jong-un, Saudi Arabia’s King Salman and Russia’s Putin in executing their citizens…’

Newsom's Over-the-Top
Gavin Newsom / IMAGE: The View via Youtube

(Ben Sellers, Liberty Headlines) The return of federal executions was awkwardly condemned by California Gov. Gavin Newsom and other members of the progressive left—who found themselves bemoaning the loss of white supremacists and child molesters, despite their adamant support for state-sanctioned infanticide.

The announcement from Attorney General William Barr that the death sentences on about 60 federal inmates would again be carried out was predictably hailed by law-and-order Republicans.

Among the first five death-row convicts in line for execution is Daniel Lewis Lee of Arkansas, a member of the Aryan People’s Republic, who murdered a family of three, including an 8-year-old girl.

Lee and an accomplice reportedly robbed the victims for money to fund the white supremacist group. He then shot his victims with a stun gun, covered their heads with plastic bags and duct tape, weighed them down with rocks and threw them in a bayou, according to the New York Daily News.

He later trivialized the murders by boasting he had put the Muellers “on a liquid diet.”

Lee, who is scheduled to be put to death on Dec. 9, has been enjoying a reprieve for the past two decades after his 1999 conviction.

Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., applauded the Justice Department for living up to its name by enacting justice for the families of Bill Mueller, 53; his wife, Nancy Mueller, 28; and her daughter, Sarah Powell, 8.

“Most Americans have always believed that the death penalty is a just response to the most heinous crimes,” Cotton said in a press statement.

“I commend the president and Attorney General Barr for reinstating the federal death penalty in order to carry out sentences imposed on five brutal murderers by juries of their peers,” he said. “After many years of unnecessary delay, justice will soon be done for these criminals’ many victims, including the Mueller family of Tilly, Arkansas.”

Of the four other murders scheduled to die—all of whom had victims who were children—two brutally raped their young victims. One of these was the killer’s daughter. Most of the cases also involved some sort of torture, desecration or dismemberment of the victims.

Friend of Boston Marathon Bombers Deported
Dias Muratovich Kadyrbayev & Dzhokhar Tsarnaev

Among the other death-row convicts biding their time are white supremacist Dylann Roof, who shot elderly members of a black church in Charleston; and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, the Boston Marathon bomber whose reign of terror took at least four lives—including that of an 8-year-old boy.

California Gov. Gavin Newsom, who was elected last year after serving previously as mayor of San Francisco, lamented the death penalty’s return in a statement released by his office.

“The intentional killing of another person is wrong, and our death penalty system has been, by all measures, a failure,” Newsom said.

“It has discriminated against defendants who are mentally ill, black and brown, or can’t afford expensive legal representation,” he continued. “It has provided no public safety benefit or value as a deterrent. It has wasted billions of taxpayer dollars. Most of all, the death penalty is absolute. It’s irreversible and irreparable in the event of human error.”

In March, Newsom placed a moratorium on California’s death penalty and closed the execution chamber at San Quentin State Prison.

Ironically, he has gone out of his way to be a vocal proponent of abortion.

As some in the film industry considered boycotting states like Georgia following the passage of pro-life heartbeat laws, Newsom released a video on Twitter in which he encouraged abortion-seekers to take refuge in his state.

Not content to let his arguments against the death penalty stand on their own, however, he wasted not the opportunity to repeat a political talking point previously uttered by fellow San Francisco Democrat, Sen. Kamala Harris bashing President Donald Trump.

Attacking the president’s efforts to pursue global diplomacy with traditional U.S. adversaries, Newsom attempted to link the U.S. death penalty to the brutality of regimes in North Korea, Russia and Saudia Arabia.

“The Trump administration has chosen to join North Korea’s Kim Jong-un, Saudi Arabia’s King Salman and Russia’s Putin in executing their citizens,” Newsom said.

Unlike the barbaric execution methods preferred by those world leaders, Barr’s newly revised federal execution protocol will rely on a single drug, pentobarbital.

Trump Atty. Gen. Nominee Barr: Mueller Probe No 'Witch Hunt'
William Barr/IMAGE: YouTube

The method “closely mirrors” that of several current states, which have used the drug more than 200 times in 14 states since 2010.

It also has been upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court, which determined it to be in line with the Eighth Amendment banning “cruel and unusual punishment.”

“Under Administrations of both parties, the Department of Justice has sought the death penalty against the worst criminals, including these five murderers, each of whom was convicted by a jury of his peers after a full and fair proceeding,” Barr said in a statement.

Harris, one of the leading Democratic primary contenders for the 2020 election, also issued a statement opposing the move.

“Let me be clear: capital punishment is immoral and deeply flawed,” she wrote. “Too many innocent people have been put to death. We need a national moratorium on the death penalty, not a resurrection.”

Another presidential contender, Sen. Bernie Sanders, weighed in, vowing to abolish the death penalty if elected.

“There’s enough violence in the world. The government shouldn’t add to it,” he said.

Additional reporting from the New York Daily News contributed to this article.