Pence Did Trump Dirty w/ Classified Docs

Mark Pellin
-
0
Pence Did Trump Dirty w/ Classified Docs

(Mark Pellin, Headline USA) Instead of former Vice President Mike Pence directing his attorneys to search for classified documents of his own in the wake of the FBI’s raid on his former boss’s Mar-a-Lago home, Pence for unknown reasons failed to act until this month while proclaiming he had no documents of his own and expressing dismay at former President Donald Trump’s actions.

It was revealed Tuesday that Pence had his own stash of documents, which his attorneys reportedly found last week at his Indiana home and turned over to the National Archives.

After the deep state attack on former President Donald Trump, his erstwhile Veep repeatedly and vigorously denied having any classified documents of his own from the duo’s White House tenure and told media outlets there was no reason for anyone to possess such material, while tepidly claiming there could have been “many better ways” to search for sensitive material at Trump’s home.

Pence’s scolding echoed that of another serial classified document confiscator, President Joe Biden, who ripped Trump after the Mar-a-Lago raid, despite knowing at the time he had his own stash of documents.

Until this month, after multiple cases of Biden’s attorneys “finding” classified documents at several different and unsecured locations, Pence failed to cast a critical eye on his own actions, despite his public rhetoric.

It remained unclear Monday exactly how many documents were found, reportedly about a dozen, or their varying classification levels.

The documents “were inadvertently boxed and transported to the personal home of the former vice president at the end of the last administration,” Pence’s lawyer, Greg Jacob, wrote in a letter to the National Archives shared with The Associated Press.

The latest revelation deflects heat and attention from Biden’s own classified document scandal, a diversion Pence didn’t present in the aftermath of the raid on Trump.

Despite recent and growing tensions with his former vice president, Trump on Monday took to Truth Social to defend Pence. Maybe. Or Maybe not. Skepticism abound on whether Trump was sincere in his comment, or if it was a sly dig.

“Mike Pence is an innocent man,” Trump proclaimed. “He never did anything knowingly dishonest in his life. Leave him alone!!!”

Atomic Scientists Warn that World is on Brink of Nuclear Annihilation

Ken Silva
-
0
Atomic Scientists Warn that World is on Brink of Nuclear Annihilation

(Ken Silva, Headline USA) As the Biden administration continues to escalate the U.S.’s role in the war in Ukraine, the scientists responsible for setting the “Doomsday Clock” have warned that the world is closer than ever before to nuclear annihilation.

The Science and Security Board of the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists said Tuesday that it is moving the hands of the Doomsday Clock forward, largely—though not exclusively—because of the mounting dangers of the war in Ukraine.

“The Clock now stands at 90 seconds to midnight—the closest to global catastrophe it has ever been,” the scientists said in a statement.

The Science and Security Board largely blamed the potential for nuclear war on Russia, whose president, Vladimir Putin, has made threats toward that end. The scientists also urged the U.S. to “keep the door open to principled engagement with Moscow.”

“Finding a path to serious peace negotiations could go a long way toward reducing the risk of escalation,” the scientists said. “In this time of unprecedented global danger, concerted action is required, and every second counts.”

However, the Biden Administration has steadily instead escalated its role in the Ukraine-Russia war.

Indeed, the Wall Street Journal reported Tuesday that U.S. officials are considering sending M1 Abrams tanks to Ukraine, despite recent comments from Pentagon officials about how they would be difficult for Ukrainian forces to maintain. This latest development follows reports last week that U.S. officials are considering helping Ukraine retake Crimea, which has been Russian territory since Putin invaded it in 2014.

NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg and numerous U.S. policymakers have also called for driving Russia out of Ukraine altogether—despite warnings from National Intelligence Director Avril Haines last May that Putin could use nuclear weapons if he thinks he’s losing the conflict.

Writing on his blog last week, former CIA Russia analyst Ray McGovern blasted the Biden Administration for its hawkish policies and lack of diplomacy with Russia.

“If the U.S. really wants to avoid war with Russia, it must realize that, barring the use of nuclear weapons, Russia is not only determined to prevail but has the means to prevail. What has gone on in Ukraine over the last nine years poses an existential threat to Russia. It will not tolerate an existential threat,” wrote McGovern, who heads an organization of former intelligence officers called the Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity.

“Biden and his sophomore advisers do not seem to ‘get it,’ and this makes it exceptionally dangerous.”

Ken Silva is a staff writer at Headline USA. Follow him at twitter.com/jd_cashless.

Calif. High School Educator Wants to Silence White People

Dmytro "Henry" Aleksandrov
-
0
Calif. High School Educator Wants to Silence White People

(Dmytro “Henry” Aleksandrov, Headline USA) A district administrator from California who is involved in overseeing curriculum revealed that she is a racist after she called to remove “privileged white voices” from stopping leftist teachers’ indoctrination of students with a far-Left ethnic studies curriculum.

In March 2021, Samia Shoman, who oversees the curriculum in the San Mateo Union High School district as manager of English Learners and Academic Support Programs, sent an email to the California State superintendent, Tony Thurmond. Zachor Legal obtained the email via a public record request, according to the New York Post.

In the email, she showed her true colors by saying that “white voices” cannot have any say when it comes to influencing the curriculum.

“We urge the [state board of education] not to give in to the pressures and influences of political lobbyists, racist & privileged white voices and individuals,” she proclaimed.

However, Shoman doesn’t have a problem only with white people. She also has a problem with “multiple perspectives.”

“The proposed revisions privileges terms like ‘multiple perspectives’, ‘diversity’, ‘all students’ and ‘broad range of groups’ undermining the primary focus on the BIPOC (Black, Indigenous, people of color) communities that compose over 80 percent of California’s student population,” Shoman said.

She also said that the proposed Black Lives Matter curriculum lesson is not enough and that it should be more extreme.

“[E]ven in the African American lesson on the Black Lives Matter movement, which is a direct response white supremacy fails to call out and analyze racism and systemic oppression,” Shoman said.

Like a true leftist, Shoman supports Palestine. Because of her political ideology, she opposed the revision of the curriculum to include Jewish-American Studies.

“The position taken by Shamia Shoman and others to treat Jews, the true indigenous people of the land of Israel, as ‘white’ occupiers and colonists is utterly at odds with history and facts,” Marc Greendorfer of Zachor Legal said. While the idea of ensuring students are taught about the history of all ethnicities is one we support, we have found that these programs are anything but educational.

“Instead, they are political indoctrination by extremists who are working to institutionalize bigotry and hate in education,” he added.

Did the Trans Mob Really Try to Cancel Aretha Franklin’s Classic ‘A Natural Woman’?

Dmytro "Henry" Aleksandrov
-
0
Did the Trans Mob Really Try to Cancel Aretha Franklin’s Classic ‘A Natural Woman’?

(Dmytro “Henry” Aleksandrov, Headline USA) A group of allegedly woke transgender activists either tried to cancel the song “A Natural Woman” by Aretha Franklin for it being “offensive” and perpetuating “multiple harmful anti-trans stereotypes,” or the group pulled a stunt that exposed the absurdity of the radical transgender movement.

The so-called Trans Cultural Mindfulness Alliance started this year and has made a series of woke posts on social media, according to the Daily Mail. One of their most viral posts was a request to pull Franklin’s song from two of the major streaming platforms — Spotify and Apple Music.

“Aretha Franklin’s 1968 song ‘Natural Woman’ perpetuates multiple harmful anti-trans stereotypes. There is no such thing as a ‘natural’ woman,” the group wrote. “This song has helped inspire acts of harm against transgender women.”

As of Jan. 24, the post had gathered more than 1 million views, but no more than 300 likes. The post received a backlash from people on social media.

“Stupidest tweet ever. On behalf of all normal people, I request you remove your Twitter account,” one Twitter user wrote. Some people suggested that denying nature is not the smartest thing to do, advising to “Stop trying to erase natural women just because some men want to be like them. Stop running from the truth!”

Others noted that the post was so crazy, it was surely a hoax.


After receiving unwanted attention from the conservative media and others on social media, the group backtracked their comments by claiming it was parody/satire, as they have indicated in their channel description.

However, before that, in a now-deleted tweet, the group declared that, “For clarification, the TCMA is not a parody organization. We are based in Norway but are seeking to open a chapter in each European country and also North America.”

That was followed by more claims of parody and a swipe at the out-sized ridiculousness of the trans movements, that people would even think to take their posts seriously.

Headline USA’s Mark Pellin contributed to this report

Business Survey Shows Recession Risks Elevated

Wire Editor
-
0

(Brett Rowland, The Center Square) The latest survey from the National Association for Business Economics found that more than half of respondents put the possibility of a recession over the next year at 50% or higher.

“The results … indicate widespread concern about entering a recession this year,” said NABE President Julia Coronado, founder and president of MacroPolicy Perspectives LLC. “For the first time since 2020, more respondents expect falling rather than increased employment at their firms in the next three months.”

The association’s Business Conditions Survey looks at the responses of 60 members from Jan. 4-11 on business conditions. It comes amid a wave of mass layoffs in the technology sector and despite continued optimism from the White House.

Respondents reported higher interest rates and costs as the biggest downside risks to their outlooks. Sixty-three percent of respondents reported rising wages over the past three months. That was unchanged from the October 2022 survey. They further reported that sales growth in the fourth quarter of 2022 was relatively unchanged from the previous quarter.

The Net Rising Index for sales — the percentage association panelists reporting rising sales minus the percentage reporting falling sales — in the fourth quarter of 2022 was 8, unchanged from the October 2022 survey. It is the lowest NRI for sales growth since the negative reading during the pandemic in the first half of 2020. The forward-looking NRI fell to 5 from 20 in the October survey, indicating weaker expectations for sales over the next quarter, according to the association.

“The survey results reveal an unevenness across indicators,” said NABE Business Conditions Survey Chair Carlos Herrera, chief economist for Coca-Cola North America. “Wages rose at a majority of respondents’ firms in the last three months of 2022 and more firms added workers than reduced headcounts. But far more firms than in the past three years reported falling profit margins.

“The panel suggests that inflation may be easing with the outlook for prices charged at its lowest reading since the October 2020 survey, overall,” Herrera said. “Materials costs have drifted down significantly since last July, and more respondents expect falling costs in the next three months.”

The survey comes on the heels of mass layoffs in several big-name tech businesses. Last week, Google’s parent company Alphabet laid off 12,000 employees. Microsoft laid off 10,000 employees. On Monday, streaming platform Spotify announced it was laying off 6% of its workforce. That’s about 600 employees.

President Joe Biden’s Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said Tuesday that she wouldn’t speculate on why companies were laying off employees.

“Our economy is continuing to grow in a steady and stable manner as we have said,” she said during a news brief at the White House. “You just have to look at the economic data.”

The Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers declined 0.1% in December on a seasonally adjusted basis, after increasing 0.1% in November, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported earlier this month. Over the last 12 months, the all items index increased 6.5% before seasonal adjustment.

“Layoffs remain near record lows according to job opening data,” Jean-Pierre said.

20 States Sue Biden Admin. over ‘Illegal Visa System’

Wire Editor
-
0
20 States Sue Biden Admin. over ‘Illegal Visa System’

(The Center Square) – Twenty states led by Texas sued the Biden administration Tuesday over another immigration policy they argue is illegal.

A new U.S. Department of Homeland Security program “unlawfully creates a de facto pathway to citizenship for hundreds of thousands of aliens,” Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton argues, referring to a plan President Joe Biden announced Jan. 5.

Part of the plan involves expanding a parole system to allow an additional 360,000 foreign nationals in the country illegally to be released into the United States, a system over which Florida already sued. Florida’s case went to trial on the same day Biden announced he was expanding the very system Florida is asking a judge to halt.

The proposed expansion allows up to 30,000 Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans and Venezuelans to enter the U.S. a month, and requires Mexico to hold another roughly 30,000 a month at U.S. taxpayer expense. The president claimed those illegally entering between ports of entry from these four countries would be returned to Mexico. Those who apply for work permits could receive a two-year authorization to live in the U.S., according to the program. If the law established by Congress was enforced, the majority of people applying to this program would be denied entry.

The plan applies to citizens of four countries who’ve increasingly entered the U.S. illegally since Biden’s been in office.

In fiscal 2022 and the first three months of fiscal 2023, for example, a record number of Cubans and Haitians have been apprehended by the U.S. Coast Guard and Border Patrol agents attempting to illegally enter Florida. Likewise, a record number of Nicaraguans and Venezuelans have been apprehended at the southern border, according to Customs and Border Protection data.

On Jan. 5, DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas again claimed “the border was closed” and expanding the parole system would “provide humanitarian relief consistent with our values, cut out vicious smuggling organizations, and enforce our laws.”

He also said, “Individuals without a legal basis to remain in the United States will be subject to prompt expulsion or removal. Individuals who are provided a safe, orderly, and lawful path to the United States are less likely to risk their lives traversing thousands of miles in the hands of ruthless smugglers, only to arrive at our southern border and face the legal consequences of unlawful entry.”

Paxton argues the program is illegal because Congress only authorized parole “for foreign aliens who meet very specific standards that have not been met in this instance. Yet, contrary to existing law, the program creates a pathway for program participants to apply from their home country and gain lawful status to enter and stay in the U.S. for up to two years, or even longer.”

Like the previous expansion of the parole system, this program was implemented “without engaging in the usual notice and comment rulemaking process required by law,” Paxton argues, which is “yet another episode in which the administration has abused its executive authority in furtherance of its apparent objective for immigration policy: open borders and amnesty for all.”

Paxton said Biden’s border policies are creating a humanitarian crisis and major problems for border states.

“Every state in America, especially border states like Texas, is being crushed by the impacts of illegal immigration,” he said. “The Biden open borders agenda has created a humanitarian crisis that is increasing crime and violence in our streets, overwhelming local communities, and worsening the opioid crisis. This unlawful amnesty program, which will invite hundreds of thousands of aliens into the U.S. every year, will only make this immigration crisis drastically worse.”

The complaint notes that the parole system can only be applied on a “case-by-case basis for urgent humanitarian reasons or significant public benefit,” not en masse as it’s been used or is being proposed.

“The parole program established by the department fails each of the law’s three limiting factors. It is not case-by-case, is not for urgent humanitarian reasons, and advances no significant public benefit. Instead, it amounts to the creation of a new visa program that allows hundreds of thousands of aliens to enter the United States who otherwise have no basis for doing so. This flouts, rather than follows, the clear limits imposed by Congress,” the complaint states.

The lawsuit was filed in U.S. District Court Southern District of Texas Victoria Division. The defendants include Mayorkas, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Director Ur Jaddou, U.S. Customs and Border Protection Acting Commissioner Troy Miller, and Acting Director of U.S. immigration and Customs Enforcement Tae Johnson, and their respective agencies.

The plaintiffs, joining Paxton, include the attorneys general of Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Florida, Idaho, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Ohio, South Carolina, Tennessee, Utah, West Virginia and Wyoming.

Seven of them, including Paxton, joined Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody last year in calling on Mayorkas to resign. Texas congressional members have called for him to be impeached, arguing he is willfully not enforcing laws established by Congress and has violated his oath of office.

Despite Mayorkas’ dismissal of their claims, and repeated claim that “the border is secure,” under his watch, the greatest number of known terrorists have been apprehended illegally entering the U.S. on record. National security experts have expressed fear about the number of alleged terrorists and criminals who’ve illegally entered who haven’t been caught.

New Gun Regulation Handicaps the Disabled

Wire Editor
-
0
New Gun Regulation Handicaps the Disabled

(John R. Lott Jr., RealClear Wire) The Biden administration’s newly released regulations regarding “pistol-stabilizing braces” will instantly turn tens of thousands of law-abiding Americans into felons and create a national rifle registry. But the Biden administration and the media exaggerate the costs and ignore the benefits these braces produce.

Few seem to realize that stabilizing braces for pistols were originally designed to allow wounded and disabled veterans who may have lost the use of part of their hand to hold handguns. They are essentially a strap attached to the gun. Disabled individuals are often viewed as easy targets by criminals, and stabilizers make it easier to defend themselves. The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives originally approved pistol braces during the Obama administration.

There are plenty of statements from disabled veterans, such as Rick Cicero, who lost his right arm in an explosion in Afghanistan and can still use a gun today because of the pistol-stabilizing brace. But outside of a brief mention in a Fox News story, news articles on the new regulations never mention that these braces help the disabled and make it possible for them to defend themselves.

Obama was hardly a friend of gun ownership, but now the Biden administration has changed the Obama administration’s decision. The ATF now concludes that any foreign-made pistols with stabilizing braces violate the law and are retroactively considered rifles and violate the size requirement for rifles. As such, registration or removal of the brace won’t bring it into compliance. The ATF leaves only two options: the destruction of the guns or their surrender to ATF. This includes imported pistols that never had a brace added to them.

Putting aside that the ATF isn’t Congress and can’t make up new laws to redefine what a rifle is, their logic is baffling. Take two otherwise identical guns, one with a pistol brace and one that never had a pistol brace: Even if the pistol brace is removed from the gun to which it was attached, it is still banned. Meanwhile, the gun that never had the brace attached could have one added, just as easily as the gun that previously had the pistol brace could have it reattached – but only the gun that once had a pistol brace attached to it is banned.

Of course, how the ATF is supposed to know whether you used to have the pistol brace attached to the gun is a mystery. Nor is it obvious why functionally identical foreign-made pistols should be treated differently than domestically manufactured ones.

All this started after President Biden cited a crime in 2021 in Colorado – where a shooter used a pistol stabilizing brace when attacking shoppers in a grocery store – to justify calling for classifying such brace-affixed pistols as machine guns. Ahmed Al Alwi murdered 10 people at close range in a Boulder grocery store. A previous shooting in 2019 by Connor Betts, in Dayton, Ohio, also involved a pistol brace. These are the only two cases of their kind and, more importantly, neither of them had any difficulty holding their guns and all their shots were fired at a short distance. There is no evidence that the brace made any difference in their ability to carry out the attacks. And there has been no surge in crime by the disabled or others using these braces.

These new regulations aren’t surprising after Steven Dettelbach, a controversial gun control advocate, was confirmed as director of the ATF. He was narrowly confirmed only with the unanimous support of all voting Democrats, including the support of Democrats who claim to support the Second Amendment, such as Montana’s Jon Tester and West Virginia’s Joe Manchin.

With no evidence that these two attacks were any more lethal with stabilizing braces – and with no attempt to make that case – gun control advocates haven’t seriously tried to justify the new regulation. The cost will be to the disabled Americans who will now have a harder time being able to defend themselves and their families.

Buttigieg Flew in Private Jets 18 Times, Costing Approx. $180K

Wire Editor
-
0
Buttigieg Flew in Private Jets 18 Times, Costing Approx. $180K

(Adam Andrzejewski, RealClear Wire) Secretary of Transportation Pete Buttigieg has flown on the taxpayer’s dime on private jets 18 times since taking office in January 2021, according to a report by the New York Post.

The report found Buttigieg flew to Nevada, Florida, Oklahoma, Minnesota, Ohio, New Hampshire and Montreal on various trips using two Cessna 560XL jets managed by the Federal Aviation Administration, according to flight tracking data obtained by watchdog group Americans for Public Trust.

While the cost of the flights was not publicly reported, the Washington Post has reported that jets like these often cost around $5,000/hour. Assuming each flight took an average of two hours, Buttigieg’s 18 flights would cost approximately $180,000.

Former cabinet members have also faced scrutiny for private jet usage in 2017. Former Secretary of Transportation Elaine Chao cost taxpayers about $94,000 for seven trips, and Secretary of Health and Human Services Tom Price cost taxpayers $1.2 million for 26 trips.

Buttigieg is not only showing a reckless disregard for taxpayers’ money but is also contradicting his stances on green energy. While he publicly espouses electric vehicles and public transportation to curb climate change, he’s been flying in gas guzzling private jets.

Buttigieg has defended his trips, with a spokesperson saying that most of his travel is by commercial airplanes, adding that, “there are some cases where it is more efficient and/or less expensive for the secretary and accompanying personnel to fly on a 9-seater FAA plane rather than commercial flights,” according to the Post.

What Is Going On Between Kevin McCarthy and Marjorie Taylor Greene?

Ben Sellers
-
0
What Is Going On Between Kevin McCarthy and Marjorie Taylor Greene?

(Ben Sellers, Headline USA) The unusual relationship between new House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., and Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., saw another twist Monday after the New York Times quoted McCarthy as pledging his undying loyalty to the second-term congresswoman.

“I will never leave that woman,” McCarthy told a friend in a private conversation reported by the Times. “I will always take care of her.”

Photos of the two becoming unusually close on the House floor began to surface during the votes for House speaker in early January.

Greene, a member of the House Freedom Caucus, surprised many by breaking rank with other conservatives to voice her staunch support of the centrist and often ineffectual McCarthy.

She quickly lashed out at his detractors after the GOP secured a slimmer-than-expected House majority in the November midterm election.

“I want to tell you how shortsighted and ridiculous that is,” Greene said in November Steve Bannon’s “War Room” podcast.

“It is pathetic, the people that are running out saying it’s his fault,” she continued. “No, that is a lazy, pathetic, wimpy, easy mindset. They just want one thing and then they want to carry on without doing the hard work—the real changes in the Republican Party and the way we fight the fight.”

Ostensibly in return for her loyalty, McCarthy promptly reinstated Greene’s committee assignments, which had been revoked in an (at the time) unprecedented partisan move by former Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif.

Her appointment to the House Homeland Security and Oversight committees roiled leftists, who claimed she was unqualified for the plum posts.

According to the Times, McCarthy also “spent hours on the phone trying to cajole senior executives at Twitter to reactivate her personal account after she was banned last year for violating the platform’s coronavirus misinformation policy.”

LOVE, REPUBLICAN STYLE?

It remained unclear, despite speculation, whether there was a romantic component to the relationship.

Greene was recently divorced amid allegations of infidelity. McCarthy’s marital situation is also the subject of intrigue.

Although he and his wife, Judy, have been together since 1992 and have two adult children, he was foisted into the center of speculation after then-Rep. Madison Cawthorn, R-N.C., hinted that McCarthy might be aware of drug-fueled orgies involving Republican members of the Swamp.

McCarthy subsequently went on record saying he had “lost his trust” in Cawthorn.

The nature of McCarthy’s relationship with his former landlord, RINO pollster Frank Luntz, who is himself a close friend of Hunter Biden, also raised questions about whether McCarthy’s unconventional lifestyle might conflict with his leadership ability.

McCarthy was previously accused of conducting an affair with former Rep. Renee Ellmers, R-N.C., who bears a striking ressemblance to Greene.

Those allegations, based on an anonymous Wikipedia entry, were blamed for derailing an earlier bid for speaker in 2015 after the Freedom Caucus forced the ouster of weepy-eyed ex-Rep. John Boehner, R-Ohio.

After McCarthy dropped out, members settled instead on failed vice-presidential candidate Paul Ryan, R-Mich.

MARRIED TO THE SWAMP?

Some have posited an alternative—although no less unseemly—theory to explain Greene’s flirtation with the D.C. Establishment, citing a personnel change as the driving force.

A highly placed conservative GOP staffer on the Hill, speaking on the condition of anonomity, told Headline USA that a shift in Greene’s staff “appears to have heavily influenced her shift toward the swamp,” especially when her current chief of staff, Ed Buckham, assumed the reins.

Buckham, a longtime Washington insider, was once chief of staff to Majority Whip Tom Delay before forming a K Street lobbying firm called Alexander Strategy Group. He was forced to close the firm and left the lobbying world in the aftermath of the poltical corruption prosecution of his close associate Jack Abramoff until he resurfaced to lead Greene’s staff.

Yet, some, including McCarthy, have praised the mollifying effect that Greene’s new alliances have had in helping bring her into the mainstream after a bumpy first term.

“If you’re going to be in a fight, you want Marjorie in your foxhole,” McCarthy explained in a brief interview for the Times article.

“When she picks a fight, she’s going to fight until the fight’s over,” he added. “She reminds me of my friends from high school, that we’re going to stick together all the way through.”

Ben Sellers is the editor of Headline USA. Follow him at twitter.com/realbensellers.

Soros Spent $40M Electing Prosecutors Who Disregard Law and Order

Ezekiel Loseke
-
0
Soros Spent $40M Electing Prosecutors Who Disregard Law and Order

(Ezekiel Loseke, Headline USA) Infamous oligarch George Soros spent $40 million on electing prosecuting attorneys who will not enforce the law, in yet another example of him purchasing government offices to undermine the American way of life.

Soros spent $40 million on 75 prosecutor’s elections. These prosecutors oppose law and order, favoring the Left’s so-called criminal justice reforms, were elected in the midterms, according to the New York Post.

One such attorney is Buta Biberaj, the prosecutor for the commonwealth of Loudon County, Virginia. Soros spent $659,000 backing her in her race, an election she won by 0.2% despite her significant advantage in funding.

Last week Biberaj announced that her office would not prosecute misdemeanor crimes. These crimes include hit-and-run, evading arrest, reckless driving, trespassing and failure to appear in court.

Portland DA Mike Schmidt received $320,000 from Soros. He announced that he would not prosecute rioters in the summer of 2020. Indeed, Schmidt has defended rioters, despite the fact that rioting is a felony.

Philadelphia DA Larry Krasner received $1.5 million from Soros. He dropped 60% of cases on shooting and 37% of illegal gun cases in his first two years in office. Shootings have spiked.

Orlando’s state attorney for the Judicial Court of Florida, Aramis Ayala, received $1.4 million from Soros. Alaya has dropped criminal charges in exchange for the criminal watching an educational video.

Los Angeles County District Attorney George Gascon received $2.25 million from Soros, and he has produced reforms to actively protect illegal immigrants from deportation.

Soros, through a complex web of shadow corporations, has spent billions of dollars shifting the American political system to the Left. This includes:

Joe Rogan summarized Soros’s political operation well. “He funds corrosion—it’s like he wants these cities to fall apart, he wants crime to flourish. It’s almost like he’s an evil person in a Batman movie.”

1...2,2232,2242,225...3,893Page 2,224 of 3,893