Transurrectionist Dems Attempt Coup at Montana Legislature

(Jacob Bruns, Headline USA) Leftist rioters descended on the Montana state legislature Monday, prompting the state riot police to manage the mob, Just the News reported.

Specifically, they entered to defend Democrat state Rep. Zooey Zephyr, a transgender lawmaker who was barred from speaking on the floor after throwing a tantrum as state Republicans sought to pass the Youth Health Protection Act, a bill that banned genital-mutilation procedures for minors.

Zephyr told the other legislators that they would have “blood on their hands” if they passed the bill.

“The only thing I will say, is if you vote yes on this bill and yes on these amendments, I hope the next time there’s an invocation when you bow your heads in prayer, you see the blood on your hands,” Zephyr said, ultimately prompting a censure from the chamber.

But not to be outdone, Zephyr addressed the protesters Monday before they entered the building.

“[The proposed bill] attacks the very reason we have elections,” Zephyr said.

“I was sent here to speak on behalf of my constituents, to speak on behalf of my community,” Zephyr added. “It’s the promise I made when I got elected, and it’s the promise that I will continue to keep every single day that I’m in this building.”

In response to the rule of law, left-wing protesters swarmed the state capitol, shouting “let her speak!” Soon thereafter, state riot police intervened.

At least seven protesters were arrested.

Zephyr later expressed support for the protesters in a tweet, suggesting that they were defending democracy.

The protesters also turned in a petition to Montana House Speaker Matt Regier to let Zephyr begin speaking once more on the House floor.

Republican Gov. Greg Gianforte proposed several amendments to the bill, which has been approved by both chambers of the legislature. He did, however, express support for the bill’s passage.

Mich. Dem. Gets House Arrest for 2020 Ballot-Box Tampering

(Molly Bruns, Headline USA) Kathy Funk, a Democrat and former township clerk in Michigan, received a six-month sentence to house arrest for tampering with a ballot box in the 2020 election.

Funk broke the seal of a ballot box in Flint, Michigan, ensuring that the votes inside could not face a recount.

According to the Daily Wire, she must wear an ankle monitor and write a public apology.

“I’m sure there’s a segment of the population that thinks you should be locked up for calling into question the integrity of an election,” Judge Mark Latchana said at her sentencing on Monday. “And if we had unlimited jail space, perhaps that’s true. But we don’t.”

The votes in the box, relegated to the 2020 primary, were ineligible after Funk’s tampering. She won by 79 votes and went on to win the general election in the fall.

Funk lied to the police, claiming there was a break in at the town hall where someone opened the ballot box.

She left her position as township clerk for another job as elections supervisor in 2021. Funk left her position after police opened an investigation.

Prosecutors spared Funk jail time, despite the misconduct being a felony punishable by up to five years in prison. The judge sentenced Funk with 24 months probation in addition to her house arrest.

“I’m not sure how I feel about the sentence,” Flint Township Supervisor Karyn Miller said. “But I am pleased that the judge made it crystal clear that this was her responsibility and she has to be accountable for it.”

Years after the 2020 election, officials are finding more and more evidence of fraudulence at all levels of government.

An investigation into a different recount in the Midwestern state revealed several major irregularities and legal violations implicating several officials, including Soros-owned Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson.

Critics also accuse Benson of blocking Republican poll watchers, destroying voter data and breaking the law with an absentee ballot order.

Sec. of State Blinken, Who Pushed Laptop ‘Disinfo’ Claim, Emailed Hunter Frequently

(Headline USA) Emails from Hunter Biden’s abandoned laptop reveal the embattled son communicated frequently with then-deputy Secretary of State Antony Blinken, who eventually helped discredit reports about Hunter’s laptop as “Russian disinformation.” 

Blinken, now Secretary of State, met with and emailed Hunter regularly, including during the time period in which Hunter sat on Ukrainian energy company Burisma’s board, according to Fox News.

In an email sent on May 22, 2015, for example, Hunter tried to schedule a meeting with Blinken so he could get Blinken’s “advice” on some things.

“Have a few minutes next week to grab a cup of coffee?” Hunter asked. “I know you are impossibly busy, but would like to get your advice on a couple of things.”

“Absolutely,” Blinken replied. “I’m just about to land in Tokyo en route back DC from Burma. I’ll be in office from Tuesday on. Copying Linda in my office to find a good time. Look forward to seeing you. Tony.”

Hunter then forwarded Blinken’s response to Devon Archer, his former business partner and fellow Burisma board member.

“Roger,” Archer replied.

After the logistics of the meeting were set, Hunter sent the information to Archer, saying “FYI.”

An email confirmation from the State Department confirms the meeting: “12:00-1:30pm- Lunch with Tony Blinken (State Department),” the email read. “Enter at main entrance (‘Diplomatic Entrance’), 22nd & C St, NW.  Proceed to receptionist area where Kenny Matthews will be waiting to escort you to Tony’s office.”

Blinken’s relationship with Hunter has come under increased scrutiny after former CIA Deputy Director Michael Morrell revealed to House Republicans last week that Blinken played an instrumental role in organizing the infamous letter, signed by dozens of former intelligence officials, dismissing the Hunter Biden laptop story as “Russian disinformation.”

Morrell said the officials would not have thought of writing or signing the letter if Blinken had not suggested it to them, according to reports.

RINO Paul Ryan Persuaded Fox News to ‘Move On’ from Trump

(Jacob Bruns, Headline USA) Former House Speaker Paul Ryan, R-Wisc., helped persuade Fox News to “move on” from former President Donald Trump, Becker News reported.

The news was leaked in a court document from the recent libel lawsuit wayed by Dominion Voting Systems over Fox News’s 2020 coverage.

According to the leaked document, Ryan, a member of Fox’s board of directors, pushed the company with the help of Fox’s head boss Rupert Murdoch and Fox Corp. CEO Lachlan Murdoch.

“As a Board Member, Ryan believed that the period immediately following the 2020 Presidential Election ‘was a pretty important inflection point, not just for the company Fox, but for the country and for the conservative movement itself,’ and shared this ‘view as a fiduciary’ with Rupert and Lachlan,” the document said.

Ryan reportedly “told Rupert and Lachlan ‘that Fox News should not be spreading conspiracy theories’,” the document added.

Further, the former congressman and failed 2012 vice presidential nominee told Fox leadership that Trump was becoming increasingly unstable, and so the right thing to do was to cut ties with the former president before it hurt Fox’s business.

He reportedly texted the two bosses, suggesting that “we are entering a truly bizarre phase of this where [Trump] has actually convinced himself of this farce and will do more bizarre things to delegitimize the election,” the legal document states.

He called the moment “a key inflection point” for Fox, wherein “the right thing and the smart business thing to do line up nicely,” especially in the wake of the Jan. 6, 2021, uprising at the U.S. Capitol.

According to the report, Ryan was “hopeful that the events of January 6 were so shocking that it would help the conservative movement and Fox News move on.”

The story has broken amid a great deal of intrigue at Fox, which recently decided to part ways with popular prime-time Fox News host Tucker Carlson.

Ala., Miss. Commemorate Confederate Memorial Day

(Headline USA) Alabama and Mississippi closed most government offices Monday for Confederate Memorial Day as efforts have stalled to abolish state holidays that honor the old Confederacy.

Legislation has been introduced in the ongoing Alabama legislative session to remove, alter or rename Confederate-related holidays, but the effort has so far gained little traction.

Camille Bennett, the founder of Project Say Something, an organization that has worked for the removal of Confederate monuments in Alabama, said the determination to keep Confederate holidays comes at the same time Alabama lawmakers push legislation banning divisive concepts from being taught in state classrooms and diversity training for state workers.

“On one side, you have white conservative men defining what divisive is and what it means,” Bennett complained.

“… At the same time, you are honoring the Confederacy, which in itself is a divisive concept,” she added. “It’s really hypocritical, quite tone deaf.”

An Alabama Senate committee last week rejected a proposal to separate the joint state holiday celebrating Confederate Gen. Robert E. Lee and slain civil rights leader the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. on the same day.

“We’re trying to separate the holidays of two men whose ideologies were totally separate, from one end of the totem pole to the other,” state Sen. Vivian Davis Figures said. “One believed in justice and fairness for all, and another believed in slavery.”

Although Lee came from a prominent line of Virginia slaveholders, his supporters have pointed out that he embodied many qualities of nobility, grace and fairness that ought to be seen as virtues—and ultimately was the man responsible for effecting the end of the Civil War by negotiating the South’s surrender.

King, meanwhile, has been lionized in the modern historical error but was famously flawed in his personal life, underscoring the importance of examining the historical figures in their full context rather than projecting modern-day social mores onto them.

The bill from Figures would have kept Lee’s holiday but moved it to Columbus Day in October. “Whoever wants to honor either man will have their own day,” she said.

The vote split along racial lines, Figures said at the end of the meeting, with white Republicans voting against it and black Democrats voting for it.

Several Southern states have ended or renamed Confederate holidays. Louisiana in 2022 removed Robert E. Lee Day and Confederate Memorial Day from the list of state holidays. Georgia in 2015 renamed Confederate Memorial Day to “State Holiday.” Arkansas in 2017 ended the practice of commemorating Lee and King on the same day.

Mississippi Public Broadcasting on Monday had historians read Mississippi’s secession declaration, which makes clear that slavery was the central issue.

Mary Jane Meadows, a member of the north Mississippi chapter of the Indivisible advocacy group, told Mississippi Public Broadcasting that the group protested Confederate Memorial Day last year and planned to do the same for 2023.

“That means that 25,000 or more state employees have a day off with pay courtesy of the Mississippi taxpayers, 39% of whom are black persons who are voters and taxpayers,” Meadows said.

Some government offices in Mississippi remained open Monday, including courts in majority-black Hinds County.

Bennett said she believes the continued recognition of Confederate holidays “speaks to the blatant disregard of the humanity of black Alabamians.”

“We experienced a Holocaust, right. We experienced our families being ripped apart, and there is a celebration saying, ‘We wish things could have stayed the same,'” Bennett said.

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

Woke ESPN’s Next Round of Disney-Mandated Layoffs to Include On-Air Talent

(Headline USA) ESPN began informing employees of layoffs Monday, which are job cuts that are taking place throughout its corporate owner, the Walt Disney Company.

Disney CEO Bob Iger announced in February that the company would reduce 7,000 jobs either through not filling positions or layoffs.

ESPN President Jimmy Pitaro said in a company memo sent to employees that those affected will hear from their supervisor and someone from human relations this week.

“As we advance as a core segment of Disney, with operational control and financial responsibility, we must further identify ways to be efficient and nimble,” Pitaro said in the memo. “We will continue to focus our workforce on initiatives that are most closely aligned with our critical priorities and emphasize decision-making and responsibility deeper into the organization.”

ESPN was not part of the first phase of Disney reductions last month. Besides this week’s layoffs, another round of job cuts will take place by the start of summer. Both phases impact off-air employees.

A round of cuts involving on-air talent will happen over the summer via contracts not being renewed, buyouts or cuts. It is not expected to resemble what happened in April of 2017, when reporters and hosts were informed at one time.

Among the known job cuts from Monday is vice president of communications Mike Soltys, who has been with the company 43 years. Soltys confirmed his departure via social media.

Disney first acquired ESPN in 1995 as part of a merger that also included the ABC network. At the time, both Disney and ESPN were beloved brands in their respective markets—Disney known for its wholesome, family-friendly entertainment, and ESPN as the leading sports-based broadcaster.

However, since then, both have increasingly lost their core identities and alienated consumers by wading into the political arena and engaging in culture war against traditional American values.

Disney’s decision to come out against Florida’s elected leaders and encourage protests over an anti-grooming bill last year drew tremendous backlash against the company and boycotts from many concerned parents, particularly as it became clear that the company had plotted to incorporate inappropriate, sexualized content into its children’s programming to help indoctrinate them on behalf of the LGBT agenda.

The company also stands to lose significantly from its ongoing battle with Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis and the state’s Republican-led legislature.

After Disney lost its longstanding privileges to maintain an autonomous, self-governed zone, the Reedy Creek District, overseeing its sprawling Disney World theme park, the company attempted a legal runaround by divesting the newly appointed DeSantis board of its governing authority. The legislature quickly moved afterward to revoke all of Disney’s special privileges, and DeSantis suggested he might put a prison on the property.

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

Leftist Celebs Scoff as Twitter Reinstates Free Blue Checkmarks

(Headline USA) Celebrities, professional athletes and other high-profile Twitter users are once again being verified by the social media platform and they don’t know why their blue check marks reappeared—nor do they seem too happy about it.

Twitter removed the blue marks last week from accounts that don’t pay a monthly fee. But the check marks mysteriously returned for many highly followed accounts over the weekend, leading some prominent users to disavow what’s become a divisive symbol of Twitter owner Elon Musk’s erratic changes to the platform.

The account belonging to the Auschwitz Memorial, which has 1.5 million followers and regularly tweets out photos and names of Holocaust victims, tweeted on Sunday that after two days of no blue check mark, its account was reverified. The Memorial said it was “obliged to clarify” that it never subscribed and paid for Twitter Blue as the icon implies.

Other high-profile accounts with more than 1 million followers also took to Twitter to make it clear they didn’t pay to get their blue check back. Those who chimed in included Massachusetts Institute of Technology, actor Bette Midler, gymnast Simone Biles Owens, writer Neil Gaiman and rapper Lil Nas X.

“On my soul i didn’t pay for twitter blue, u will feel my wrath tesla man!” wrote the “Old Town Road” rapper, who has 8 million followers.

Added Gaiman, who has 3 million followers: “What a sad, muddled place this has become.”

Midler posted on Twitter Sunday: “Yes, Elon gave me back my blue check but I didn’t pay for it. Does that make me a good guy or a bad guy? I’m so confused.” But by Monday, there was no sign she had a blue check.

On Twitter, the blue check icon appears on accounts next to text that says: “subscribed to Twitter Blue and verified their phone number.” Since last week, blue check marks also appeared on profiles of dead public figures, including author and chef Anthony Bourdain, who died in 2018; the actor Chadwick Boseman, who died in 2020; and the journalist Jamal Khashoggi, who was assassinated in 2018.

Under the original blue-check system, Twitter had roughly 400,000 verified users, including Hollywood actors and star athletes as well as journalists, human rights activists and public agencies. In the past, the checks meant that Twitter had verified that users were who they said they were, as a method to prevent impersonation and the spread of misinformation.

But now anyone can buy a Twitter Blue subscription starting at $8 a month. It no longer means the user is verified—other than confirming a phone number—but promises a number of features including the ability to have more people see their tweets.

Legal experts said Twitter doling out subscriptions to people and institutions that didn’t want them, and implying that they paid for it could run afoul of the federal Lanham Act, which prohibits false advertising, as well as other regulations.

The fact that some accounts say they are subscribed to Twitter Blue—even though they have been outspoken about not subscribing—can create a sense of “false endorsement,” said Alejandra Caraballo, an instructor at the Cyberlaw Clinic at Harvard Law School’s Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society.

That said, a false endorsement lawsuit would be limited to “actual damages” the person suffered as a result, Caraballo added.

“My guess is the most common thing is that if someone really is upset about this, they could send a cease-and-desist letter to get Twitter to take it down,” she said.

Musk has pushed for the premium service as a way to increase revenue and upend what he called a “lords & peasants system” that he believes gave too many people an undeserved status symbol for free. But only a fraction of users—and very few of those who had the blue checks before—are buying the service.

An inability to sell subscriptions or find other ways of making money could present problems for Musk, who bought Twitter for $44 billion last year and has struggled to keep advertisers—its main source of revenue—from fleeing the platform.

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

Biden Formally Announces Reelection Bid; Threatens to ‘Finish This Job’

(Headline USA) President Joe Biden on Tuesday formally announced that he is running for reelection in 2024, asking voters to give him more time to “finish the job” he began when he was sworn into office and to set aside their concerns about extending the run of America’s oldest president for another four years.

Biden, who would be 86 at the end of a second term faces a smooth path to winning his party’s nomination, with no serious Democratic rivals, despite the presence of a political scion, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who will bring stark contrast between the traditional liberalism of the past with the radical progressive politics of today’s Democrats. Nonetheless, Kennedy has fallen out of favor on the Left due to his outspoken opposition to the COVID-19 vaccine.

Biden, meanwhile, is set for a hard-fought struggle to retain the presidency in a bitterly divided nation.

The announcement, in a three-minute video, comes on the four-year anniversary of when Biden declared for the White House in 2019, promising to heal the “soul of the nation” amid the turbulent presidency of Donald Trump—a goal that has remained elusive given Biden’s own divisive rhetoric and incompetence.

“I said we are in a battle for the soul of America, and we still are,” Biden said. “The question we are facing is whether in the years ahead we have more freedom or less freedom. More rights or fewer.”

While the prospect of seeking reelection has been a given for most modern presidents, that’s not always been the case for Biden. A notable swath of Democratic voters have indicated they would prefer he not run, in part because of his age—concerns Biden has called “totally legitimate” but ones he did not address head-on in the launch video.

Yet few things have unified Democratic voters like the prospect of Trump returning to power.

And Biden’s political standing within his party stabilized after Democrats notched a stronger-than-expected performance in last year’s midterm elections, despite losing the House. Many continue to suspect massive vote fraud in states like Pennsylvania, Nevada and Arizona, where GOP candidates maintained close races and lost under highly dubious circumstances.

The president is set to run again on the same themes that buoyed his party last fall, particularly abortion and efforts to vilify his political rivals in the starkest of terms.

“Freedom. Personal freedom is fundamental to who we are as Americans. There’s nothing more important. Nothing more sacred,” Biden said in the launch video.

Biden plans to continue to cast all Republicans as embracing what he calls “ultra-MAGA” politics—a reference to Trump’s “Make America Great Again” slogan—regardless of whether his predecessor ends up on the 2024 ballot.

“Around the country, MAGA extremists are lining up to take those bedrock freedoms away,” he said. “This is not a time to be complacent.”

In the video, Biden speaks over brief clips and photographs of key moments in his presidency, snapshots of diverse Americans and flashes of outspoken Republican foes, including Trump, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, and Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia.

He exhorts supporters that “this is our moment” to “defend democracy. Stand up for our personal freedoms. Stand up for the right to vote and our civil rights.”

The president also has multiple policy goals and unmet promises from his first campaign that he’s asking voters on giving him another chance to fulfill.

“Let’s finish this job. I know we can,” Biden said in the video, repeating a mantra he said a dozen times during his State of the Union address in February, listing everything from passing a ban on assault-style weapons and lowering the cost of prescription drugs to codifying a national right to abortion after the Supreme Court’s ruling last year overturning Roe v. Wade.

Biden also plans to point to his work over the past two years shoring up American alliances, leading a global coalition to support Ukraine’s defenses against Russia’s invasion and returning the U.S. to the Paris climate accord.

But public support in the U.S. for Ukraine has softened in recent months, and some voters question the tens of billions of dollars in military and economic assistance flowing to Kyiv.

The president faces lingering criticism over his administration’s chaotic 2021 withdrawal from Afghanistan after nearly 20 years of war, which undercut the image of competence he aimed to portray, and he’s the target of GOP attacks over his immigration and economic policies.

As a candidate in 2020, Biden pitched voters on his familiarity with the halls of power in Washington and his relationships around the world. But even back then, he was acutely aware of voters’ concerns about his age.

“Look, I view myself as a bridge, not as anything else,” Biden said in March 2020, as he campaigned in Michigan with younger Democrats, including now-Vice President Kamala Harris, Sen. Cory Booker of New Jersey and Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer. “There’s an entire generation of leaders you saw stand behind me. They are the future of this country.”

Three years later, the president now 80, Biden allies say his time in office has demonstrated that he saw himself as more of a transformational than a transitional leader.

Still, many Democrats would prefer that Biden didn’t run again. A recent poll from the Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research shows just 47% of Democrats say they want him to seek a second term, up from 37% in February. And Biden’s verbal—and occasional physical — stumbles have become fodder for critics trying to cast him as unfit for office.

Biden, on multiple occasions, has brushed back concerns about his age, saying simply, “Watch me.”

Aides acknowledge that while some in his party might prefer an alternative to Biden, there is anything but consensus within their diverse coalition on who that might be. And they insist that when Biden is compared with whomever the GOP nominates, Democrats and independents will rally around Biden.

For now, the 76-year-old Trump is the favorite to emerge as the Republican nominee, creating the potential of a historic sequel to the bitterly fought 2020 campaign.

DeSantis is emerging as an early alternative to Trump, but his stature is also in question, however, amid questions about his readiness to campaign outside of his increasingly Republican-leaning state.

To prevail again, Biden will need the alliance of young voters and black voters — particularly women — along with blue-collar Midwesterners, moderates and disaffected Republicans who helped him win in 2020.

He’ll have to again carry the so-called “blue wall” in the Upper Midwest, while protecting his position in Georgia and Arizona, longtime GOP strongholds he narrowly won last time.

Biden’s reelection bid comes as the nation weathers uncertain economic crosscurrents. Inflation has hit the highest rate in a generation despite Federal Reserve interest rate hikes.

Presidents typically try to delay their reelection announcements to maintain the advantages of incumbency and skate above the political fray for as long as possible while their rivals trade jabs. But the leg up offered by being in the White House can be rickety — three of the last seven presidents have lost reelection, most recently Trump in 2020.

Biden’s announcement is roughly consistent with the timeline followed by then-President Barack Obama, who waited until April 2011 to declare for a second term and didn’t hold a reelection rally until May 2012. Trump launched his reelection bid on the day he was sworn in in 2017.

Biden is not expected to dramatically alter his day-to-day schedule as a candidate—at least not immediately—with aides believing his strongest political asset is showing the American people that he is governing. And if he follows the Obama playbook, he may not hold any formal campaign rallies until well into 2024.

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

Trump Tells Rival Network He Was ‘Shocked’ by Fox/Carlson Split

(Mark Pellin, Headline USA) Donald Trump took to rival conservative network Newsmax on Monday night with his first public comments after it was reported that Fox News had parted ways with wildly popular host and conservative firebrand Tucker Carlson.

“I’m shocked. I’m surprised,” the former president told Newsmax’s Greg Kelly during an interview Monday night from Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home.

“He’s a very good person and a very good man,” Trump said of Carlson. “And very talented, as you know, he had very high ratings. I just said, wow, that was something, that’s a big one.”

Trump declined to speculate on what triggered the split, when Kelly noted there had been “a lot of turmoil” at Fox after their $787-million Dominion Voting lawsuit settlement, and asked why the network would “get rid of a guy who is performing, why would somebody do that to their business?”

Trump, instead, said he was “surprised” that Fox settled the Dominion lawsuit, when he “thought that was a case that easily should have been won.”

As for Carlson’s exit from Fox, Trump said, “Look, you’ll have to ask them. I’m not representing them, at all, by any means. But the Tucker situation — again, you don’t know if it’s a firing or he left because he wasn’t being given his free reign, maybe.”

That line of reasoning was widely shared on social media, where it was reported that Carlson departed after being stonewalled on releasing a blistering response to a 60 Minute’s report that ran cover for suspected J6 fed plant Ray Epps. Another theory offered that it had to do with the Dominion settlement.

“My sources are telling me: Tucker was all set to go live tonight,” Justin Hart tweeted Monday. “He probably had plans to talk about the lawsuit and clear his name. Producers were prepping guests and slots of Monday’s show. Corporate nixed the idea and Tucker up and quit!”

“I have a longtime friend at Fox News,” tweeted Snoop Bailey. “He just texted me that Tucker was planning a segment to destroy the 60 Minutes Epps episode. Exec Producer Jennifer Rauchet told him he couldn’t run the segment so he quit.”

Whatever drove the Carlson/Fox split, rival conservative network Newsmax was ready to capture an expected audience share that was already fleeing Fox.

“Tucker was the voice for the forgotten Americans who felt ignored by mainstream media and politicians,” tweeted Revolver News. “His sudden departure is a significant loss, and his fans are understandably upset. Many are fighting back by canceling their Fox Nation subscriptions.”

“I cancelled my @foxnation subscription tonight,” tweeted one former viewer. “I only watched Tucker’s show. They will not get another penny. Delete them, too.”

That overall sentiment was reflected in the network’s plummeting stock in the wake of their split with Carlson.

Newsmax CEO Christopher Ruddy said his network was primed to pick up the viewers, while taking a dig at Fox News.

“For a while Fox News has been moving to become establishment media and Tucker Carlson’s removal is a big milestone in that effort,” Ruddy said in a statement. “Millions of viewers who liked the old Fox News have made the switch to Newsmax and Tucker’s departure will only fuel that trend.”

CDC Hijacking Public Schools’ Curriculum to Push Leftist Agendas

(Mark Pellin, Headline USA) A national parental-rights group sounded alarm bells this week over the Biden administration once again trying to weave its radical leftist agenda into public schools. 

Falling in line with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s educational power grab in the wake of pandemic school closures and horrific learning losses triggered largely by the administration’s misguided policies, the School Superintendent’s Association, representing upward of 120 districts across the country, is launching its Learning 2025 plan that calls for a “holistic redesign” of the United States’ public education system.

The initiative, and its equity-based curriculum promoting social counseling for far-left DEI initiatives, is a direct assault on parental rights, said Melissa Jackson, chief operating officer for No Left Turn in Education.

Jackson and other critics of the association’s Learning 2025 program and the CDC’s “Whole Community, Whole Child” educational template contend both initiatives are “aimed at manipulating students’ values and beliefs to replace parents as the primary moral authority in their child’s lives,” Fox News reported. The values and beliefs being peddled by both programs rely heavily on the dogma of critical race theory and gender-identity theory.

Public school systems have increasingly funneled those agendas through what officials have dubbed “social-emotional learning” programs, what NLTE referred to as “socially engineered learning,” that focus on defined beliefs and behaviors instead of traditional education.

“Our schools no longer teach reading, writing, and arithmetic,” Teresa Mull, a research fellow in education policy at The Heartland Institute, wrote in The Hill. “Rather than be taught how to think and problem-solve, children are thought what to think and how to feel. All these money-making and money-spending schemes tend to sound nice, of course, but they inevitably fall flat.”

The Learning 2025 is a perfect example, NLTE’s Jackson argued, noting that the curriculum is basically a CDC-rehash that works to instill the same pandemic social policy guidelines.

“I have a problem accepting a program from the very same people that caused the problem,” said NLTE’s Chief Research Officer Apryl Dukes. “That’s what I want parents to know, is that these organizations were part of it, and now they’re offering you a solution to the problem.”

Biden regime officials claimed that the Learning 2025 initiative being adopted nationwide by the public school districts “is not a CDC program.” An agency document reviewed by Fox News told a different story.

“AASA is using the new model with our superintendent cadre,” the CDC boasted of its Whole Child program. “We’ve updated all of our coordinated school health training materials to include the new model as the model for coordinated school health.”

The expanding parameters of “coordinated school health” are designed to indoctrinate educators, starting with superintendents, on how to “shush us and push us [parents] out of the picture, so they can do what they feel is best for our children,” said NLTE’s Holly Terei, who as the group’s Teacher Coalition national director, attended a Learning 2025 conference last summer.

“Through what I’ve learned at the conference, there’s an intentionality of bypassing parental rights by not being transparent about the implementation of the program, the data collection that goes into it, the fact that it’s not a proven educational program and that our children, who have been signed up as demo districts with Learning 2025, are literally a part of a social educational experiment,” Terei said.

The correlations and similarities between the national superintendents’ association and CDC agenda were glaring, she said, and cause for concern.

“If you put Learning 2025 and the CDC Whole Child model side by side, it is exactly the same. They tweak some of the wording like whole learner and whole child,” she said.

“It’s kind of like, let’s put lipstick on a pig and call it a lady. With Learning 2025, we can kind of gloss over it with a lot of this fluffy, flowery language and kind of mask the true intentions behind it.”