Kamala Harris Puts Onus on Teen Girls to Push Abortion Movement

(Molly Bruns, Headline USA) Vice President Kamala Harris pushed the legacy of the pro-abortion movement on young girls in recent interview with Teen Vogue.

According to Breitbart, Harris gave the interview on the anniversary of the decision of Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health, after giving another abortion-related speech in North Carolina.

In the speech, Harris claimed that American Christians would not have to “abandon their faith or deeply held beliefs to agree” with on-demand abortions for women and girls of all ages.

Through the speech and the interview, she complained about pro-life Republicans, calling them “extremists” and lamenting the end of Roe v. Wade.

She also called the readers of the teen lifestyle magazine “leaders,” and put the onus on them to step up and speak out about abortion, despite their limited life experience and reasoning ability.

“You are leaders by virtue of the fact that you are reading this,” Harris said. “And I’m counting on you because your voice and your perspective is so important to the future of our country.”

She encouraged the readers to “vote,” “organize” and “remind each other that [they] are leaders.”

Harris also pushed young girls to tell their friends about abortion clinics.

“Also, use your voice through your social media to remind people who are going through struggles, maybe unwanted pregnancies, to know that they are not alone and that there’s help available to them,” she said.

With Democrats both hoping to rebrand the woefully unpopular vice president and to leverage abortion as a key campaign issue, party leaders are gambling that she will be the one most capable of pushing it ahead of the 2024 presidential race.

Harris hosted a meeting with women in the abortion industry and other related activist groups to garner insight on effectively spreading the pro-abortion message so it “doesn’t get stuck in the D.C. echo chamber.”

A pro-abortion PAC known as EMILY’s List also elected to boost Harris’s image with a $10 million public relations campaign.

Harris earned the highest net negative approval ratings for any vice president in American history, with a recent poll revealing that 49% of registered voters held a negative view of the veep.

However, President Joe Biden’s advancing cognitive decline and a series of major scandals both cast questions as to whether he will be able to complete his first term, much less endure a second four-year stint in office.

Bud Light Desperately Pivots Back to Its Popular ‘Dilly Dilly’ Ad Campaign

(Molly Bruns, Headline USA) In a desperate attempt to drum up some business, Bud Light marketing officials brought back the iconic “Bud Knight” ad campaign.

According to the Daily Caller, the Bud Knight was the central figure of the brand’s “Dilly Dilly” ad campaign, which ran from 2017 to 2019.

The group announced the mascot’s revival in a tweet from the Bud Knight’s account, which read “Yeah, I’m thinking I’m back.”

The announcement had the opposite of its intended effect, drawing even greater criticism.

“I’m thinking not,” said conservative pundit Sara Higdon, who attached a photo of a Bud Light sponsored stage at Toronto’s Pride festival less than a week ago.

“Is the armor tuck friendly?” commentator Benny Johnson asked jokingly, while another admonished, “Lets see you post some HR actionable material first.”

Consumers First Executive Director Will Hild offered his own take, cracking that “We now know who’s behind the mask…@BudLight went from Dilly Dilly to Dylan Dylan.”

Bud Light has gone to great lengths to regain their customers after recruiting transgender influencer Dylan Mulvaney in an ad campaign leading up to “Pride” month. The initial reasoning behind the endorsement of transgenderism was to abandon the so-called “fratty” image of the brand.

Since the release of the cans with Mulvaney’s face on them, Bud Light sales plummeted and they released several corny advertisements in half-hearted attempts to repair their image.

The initial attempt to recoup the brand was an ad with several wide shots of a Clydesdale galloping through American landscapes, accompanied by a nonsensical voice over.

A second attempt was made when the company thought to redesign the Budweiser aluminum bottles by adding camouflage.

The company has even struggled to give away beer for free.

Between the desperate pandering and recent revelations of ties to the World Economic Forum, Bud Light and their affiliated parent companies recently lost their sales crown to Modelo.

DOJ Inspector General: Epstein Really DID Kill Himself

(Ken Silva, Headline USA) Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz released Tuesday his much-anticipated report on millionaire sex criminal Jeffrey Epstein’s mysterious August 9, 2019, death—finding numerous instances of negligence by guards and other prison personnel, but stopping short of alleging criminality.

Horowitz also reinforced government’s narrative that Epstein did, in fact, kill himself at the now shuttered Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York.

The problems Horowitz outlined in his report have already been widely documented, for the most part.

The DOJ inspector general recounted how Epstein originally tried killing himself on July 23. At that point, prison officials should have ensured that he always had a cellmate, Horowitz said.

But on the day before Epstein’s death, his cellmate was transferred to another jail. Horowitz found that BOP officials interviewed for his report “lacked candor” in their explanations for why Epstein was not provided with another cellmate, which allowed him to allegedly kill himself with no one there to call for help.

Horowitz also blasted the prison guards for failing to conduct routine cell checks. Had the guards conducted proper cell inspections, Horowitz said, they would’ve found Epstein had excess linens he used to allegedly hang himself.

Horowitz’s investigation, the last of several official inquiries into Epstein’s death, echoed previous findings that some members of the jail staff involved in guarding Epstein were overworked.

He identified 13 employees with performance failures and recommended possible criminal charges against four workers. Only the two workers assigned to guard Epstein the night he died were charged, avoiding jail time in a plea deal after admitting to falsifying logs.

Along with human errors, Horowitz also discussed the malfunctioning cameras that were supposed to be recording activity around Epstein’s cell.

Few of the cameras in the area where Epstein was housed were making recordings of the images they captured due to a mechanical failure July 29. The prison had contracted for a camera system upgrade three years before his death, but it had not been completed, in part due to serious staffing shortages, according to Horowitz.

The failures are deeply troubling not only because they allowed Epstein’s suicide but also because they “led to questions about the circumstances surrounding Epstein’s death and effectively deprived Epstein’s numerous victims of the opportunity to seek justice,” Horowitz said.

However, the inspector general said his investigators found no evidence to suggest anything other than suicide, echoing the findings of New York City’s medical examiner’s office, which determined Epstein killed himself, and a separate FBI investigation that found no crimes directly associated with the death.

No physical evidence supported any of the many conspiracy theories surrounding Epstein’s death, Horowitz concluded, and none of the video captured from the cameras that were recording showed any indication of anyone else in the cell. Investigators probed for possible money changing hands involving guards but found no evidence of that, either.

Responding to the findings, the Bureau of Prisons said it has accepted all eight of Horowitz’s recommendations, has updated its suicide-watch process and will apply other lessons learned “to the broader BOP correctional landscape.”

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Ken Silva is a staff writer at Headline USA. Follow him at twitter.com/jd_cashless.

Anti-vax ESPN Anchor Rejects Woke Network’s Settlement Offer in Free Speech Case

(Robert Jonathan, Headline USA) Sage Steele has reportedly turned down $500,000 to settle her lawsuit against Disney-owned ESPN.

In April 2022, the SportsCenter anchor sued both woke corporations in Connecticut Superior Court for allegedly violating her free-speech rights after she publicly spoke against Disney’s COVID-19 employee vaccine mandate.

The longtime ESPN broadcaster, 50, is being represented by a Connecticut law firm as well as high-powered Los Angeles attorney Bryan Freedman, who also represents heavy hitters like Tucker Carlson in employment disputes.

In the context of the proposed settlement, Freedman called out Disney for its hypocrisy when it comes to freedom of speech.

“Disney and ESPN clearly admit their liability by offering to pay Sage Steele more than half a million dollars for taking away her right to free speech. The offer misses the point. Disney cannot purchase their employee’s constitutional rights no matter how powerful they think they are,” his statement declared.

“How about apologizing and treating people fairly? Let me put it this way, would Disney be willing to accept money from the state of Florida and Governor DeSantis in exchange for being silenced? Why the double standard?”

Steele, who reluctantly complied with the corporate jab edict, allegedly got into trouble when she told former NFL QB Jay Cutler on his podcast that the policy, rather than allowing people to make their own individual healthcare decisions, was “scary” and “sick.”

During the same interview, Steele — who is biracial — made some controversial remarks about how Barack Obama identifies himself, which apparently also displeased corporate execs.

Connecticut, where ESPN headquarters is located, has a law on the books, General Statues §31-51q, that protects employees from any workplace disciplinary action for exercising their free-speech rights under the U.S. or state constitution.

The parties to the lawsuit disagree over whether Steele was actually suspended for her comments.

“In a knee-jerk reaction, ESPN and Disney relied on the misleading characterizations
of her comments, bowed to groupthink and forced Steele to publicly apologize and suspended her for a period of time in October 2021,” the 16-page lawsuit contends.

ESPN supposedly has a no-politics policy under its current president Jimmy Pitaro, but that does not seem to apply to the channel’s woke anchors who on various occasions have pushed a left-wing narrative during the cable channel’s programs.

Sage Steele’s lawsuit mentions some of those instances.

“Countless numbers of Steele’s on-air peers continue in a sustained pattern spanning many years of plainly engaging in public commentary on political matters, but none of them faced any discipline whatsoever for doing so. IF ESPN truly embraced inclusion and diversity, it would embrace diversity of opinions,” the lawsuit asserted in that context.

The lawsuit also delves into other aspects of alleged unfair treatment at the so-called Worldwide Leader in Sports.

In addition to alleging free-speech violations, the legal complaint accuses both defendants of breach of contract, bad-faith conduct, and both negligent and intentional infliction of emotion distress. She is also seeking a formal court ruling that ESPN and Disney violated state law as it pertains to free speech.

ESPN has lost a significant amount of viewership in the past number of years with a combination of cord-cutting plus alienating a portion of its audience with lectures about social justice, the latter as alluded to in the lawsuit.

Another round of Disney-ordered layoffs is also reportedly imminent at ESPN.

Several on-air personalities have already announced their departure in this latest headcount reduction.

In putting forth the settlement offer, ESPN specifically denied any liability. This is a a standard disclaimer when a defendant decides to pony up some cash to make a case go away rather than endure the time and expense of further litigation.

The case, if it doesn’t settle on other terms before then, reportedly has a March 2024 trial date.

In the meantime, Steele is still regularly anchoring on SportsCenter.

CNN Host Obsesses over Beefcake RFK Jr., Floats Conspiracy Theory

(Jacob Bruns, Headline USA) In a Monday tweet, CNN’s Chris Hayes accused Robert F. Kennedy Jr. of taking steroids or some other performance-enhancing drugs in order to achieve his current physique at age 69.

“People realize that *no one* is the most jacked they’ve ever been at the age of 69 without some. . . help, right?” the soft and pudgy CNN host wondered aloud.

Of course, Kennedy, who is currently running as a Democrat challenger to President Joe Biden, is well known for his opposition to putting harmful chemicals into the human body, so the odds that he would be taking pharmaceuticals to aid his workouts are extremely low.

Despite being the scion from one of liberal Left’s most notorious political dynasties, Kennedy’s vaccine skepticism and distrust of the deep-state have helped him to win over conservative supporters, while drawing a rare level of contempt for a fellow Democrat from mainstream media outlets.

Hayes was mocked  on Twitter for his RFK Derangement Syndrome, with some suggesting he was jealous of the older man’s physique.

Others suggested that Hayes was pushing the same sort of conspiracy theory that critics have often tried to pin on Kennedy.

Some mocked Hayes and the Left more generally for its relative ugliness and lack of concern for decent hygiene and health.

“You’re pathetic,” another Twitter user wrote. “A guy works hard and takes good care of himself, and you insinuate there must be something wrong.”

CNN—following the lead of the media as a whole—has gone out of his way on numerous occasions to try to show Kennedy’s presidential campaign in a poor light.

The mainstream media has been particularly offended by Kennedy’s anti-vaccine stance and affirmation of the need to protect the health of Americans from predatory corporate practices.

Last week, for example, CNN host Jake Tapper said that he would not host a Town Hall event with Kennedy because of the dangerous “misinformation” that he spreads.

“[Kennedy] spreads dangerous misinformation about childhood vaccines,” Tapper noted, calling RFK “dishonest” and accusing him of promoting he lies about “how the media is co-opted by Big Pharma.”

Tapper, who spent years promoting an utterly false Russia-collusion hoax, previously labeled Kennedy an “anti-vaccine quack” who was a “healthcare menace.”

SCOTUS Deals Setback to State Legislatures over Court-Ordered Gerrymandering

(Ben Sellers, Headline USA)

However, the Republican lawmakers, led by House Speaker Tim Moore, wound up getting the last laugh in the long run.

In Moore v. Harper, the latest in a long series of clashes between state lawmakers and left-wing activists over redistricting to make it to the high court, the central question was whether the U.S. Constitution’s elections clause carved out an exception to the process of judicial review by specifically enumerating that authority to the state legislatures.

The court’s leftist block sided with its squishy centrist trio of Roberts, Kavanaugh and Barrett to argue that “State courts retain the authority to apply state constitutional restraints when legislatures act under the power conferred upon them by the Elections Clause”—although there were bounds as to what the courts had the authority to do.

The case questioned whether the judicial branch can nullify redistricting maps created by the General Assembly.

North Carolina’s Supreme Court in 2022 ruled the redistricting plan excessively partisan. However, the court’s leftist majority was flipped conservative in the following year’s midterm elections, which the makeup of the panel.

The new panel reversed that decision earlier this year, allowing the legislature to keep its original maps and rendering the current case moot to some extent, but relevant in case the issue should arise in the future.

Because of the latest move by the state’s highest court, Justices Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch dissented and said they would have dismissed the case.

“Justice Thomas is right, the case is over, and the legislators won, today’s SCOTUS opinion doesn’t change that,” said Jeanette Doran, president and general counsel of the NC Institute for Constitutional Law.

Decisions on voting rights cases involving Alabama and Louisiana had already happened this month. A case in Ohio remains pending, should the bench wish to issue another ruling prior to the 2024 election cycle.

NFL Player Forced to Cancel Charity Golf Tournament after Sponsor Boycotts Trump-Owned Course

(Ezekiel Loseke, Headline USA) Jordan Poyer, a strong safety who plays for the Buffalo Bills, canceled his charity golf game because a sponsor opposed the event being held at a golf course owned by President Donald Trump, The Blaze reported.

Poyer announced the cancellation in a video he posted to Instagram.

He also posted a caption along with the video:

“I regret to inform you that my annual Golf Event in South Florida to help raise money for the community, originally scheduled for July 10th at the Blue Monster at Trump National in Doral, has been rescheduled for next year,” he wrote.

“Unfortunately, the location of the event led to a few sponsors and golfers withdrawing at the last minute due to external pressures,” he continued, expressing disappointment and frustration. “Next offseason, we will host this event with unwavering dedication, ensuring that it remains free from any external distractions. I extend my heartfelt gratitude to all of you.”

In the video, Poyer explained that he was forced to cancel the event because of the political orientation of one of the event’s sponsors, Erie County Medical Center Foundation, a Buffalo-area hospital.

Poyer expressed frustration with the situation.

“I’m not naïve. I understand where they are on the political spectrum, where New York is on the political spectrum,” he explained.

“Do I agree with a lot of it? No, I don’t. I’m sorry, but I don’t,” he continued. “I still went and put my ego aside and went to go help those who needed help or needed a laugh.”

But the woke medical center, on the other hand, put its politics ahead of charity, reportedly making the decision to drop out after facing a letter-writing pressure campaign from golf teams that were likewise boycotting the event.

“ECMC decided they can no longer take the pressure from up top, from the people above them, and it probably has nothing to do with ECMC at all,” Poyer said.

Poyer’s representative agency, Avalon Sports, echoed the sentiment in an official statement it posted to Twitter.

“We were sadly surprised by negative comments by some individuals trying to make this a political battle and divide our community,” the sports agency wrote, explaining that Poyer and the agency were only interested in raising money for people in Buffalo.

Poyer’s wife, Rachel Bush, issued a fiery statement on twitter.

“Let’s be very clear. Jordan did not cancel his event,” she wrote, explaining that she and her husband proudly and publicly hold their beliefs. “The event was cancelled due to the arrogance of others, and then backing out last minute leaving us in a difficult spot to make everything happen properly,” she continued, explaining that the couple was on a family vacation when the sponsors pulled out.

“Tournament will be at same spot next year,” she added. “Trump’s course.”

The hospital disputed its status as a sponsor and claimed it was a beneficiary of the event, according to The Blaze.

House Report: DHS Conspired w/ Big Tech to Censor Free Speech, Cover Tracks

(Mark Pellin, Headline USA) A new report revealed disturbing evidence that outlined the Biden administration’s efforts to use an insidious collaboration between a division of the Department of Homeland Security and its partners in Big Tech to undermine the First Amendment by censoring free speech using third-party cutouts to cover their tracks.

The U.S. House weaponization of government subcommittee on Monday released a report that cited DHS emails and meeting notes, detailing how the department allegedly used the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency to monitor and censor social media speech for anything critical of regime vaccine policy or questioning the 2020 election.

“CISA must be reined in, as must the Biden Administration’s ‘whole-of-government’ approach to social media censorship,” lawmakers wrote in the report.

“Every American has the right to express his or her opinion online, and to receive information from others. Government classifications of opinions as ‘misinformation’ or ‘disinformation’ do not nullify the First Amendment’s guarantees.”

The weaponization committee’s report rolled out a timeline showing CISA moving its censorship operation to third-party intermediaries after the agency and the Biden administration “were sued in federal court, implicitly admitting that its censorship activities are unconstitutional.”

The report claimed that CISA purposefully used the non-profits “as its mouthpiece to ‘avoid the appearance of government propaganda.’”

Documents released in the committee’s report described the CISA transitioning from “countering foreign influence” to policing domestic discussions and debate, forming an official “mis, dis, and malformation” or MDM team.

“Although CISA’s efforts to police speech are highly troubling overall, one particularly problematic aspect is CISA’s focus on ‘malformation,’” the report stated. “According to CISA’s own definition, ‘malformation is based on fact, but used out of context to mislead, harm or manipulate.”

After being warned last year by the National Association of Secretaries of State “that it is important for CISA to remain within their operational and mission limits. CISA specifically should stick with misinformation and disinformation as related to cybersecurity issues,” the committee’s report claimed CISA redoubled efforts to hide their mission.

The agency’s cover-up “included scrubbing CISA’s website of references to domestic ‘misinformation’ and ‘disinformation,’” the report stated.

One member of the agency’s MDM team conceded that its intent was to “disguise the true nature” of its work, according to the report.

“It’s only a matter of time before someone realizes we exist and starts asking about our work,” informed an email obtained by the weaponization subcommittee, reportedly written by a MDM team member.

“Yes. I agree,” another reportedly responded. “We have a couple of pretty obvious vulnerabilities.”

CNN Pushes Leaked Trump Tape as Latest Biden Bribery Distraction

(Mark Pellin, Headline USA) CNN was roundly roasted for its promotional hyping of leaked audio that claimed to add new details about a conversation where former president Donald Trump reportedly discussed and displayed classified documents.

The recording, which was originally referenced here nearly a month ago and has since been extensively covered by media and addressed by Trump, was touted by CNN as offering “new details from the conversation that is a critical piece of evidence in special counsel Jack Smith’s indictment of Trump over the mishandling of classified information, including a moment when Trump seems to indicate he was holding a secret Pentagon document with plans to attack Iran.”

The CNN audio purported that Trump was lamenting about his relationship with Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Mark Milley, during an interview with an author.

“With Milley – let me see that, I’ll show you an example. He said that I wanted to attack Iran. Isn’t it amazing? I have a big pile of papers. This thing just came up. Look. This was him. They presented me this. This is off the record, but they presented me this. This was him. This was the Defense Department and him,” Trump said, according to the recording.

Other people in the room could be heard reacting as they apparently viewed the alleged classified documents.

“We looked at some. This was him. This wasn’t done by me, this was him. All sorts of stuff, pages-long,” Trump said, according to the recording. “I just found, isn’t that amazing? This totally wins my case, you know?”

The former president apparently continued to flip through more documents.

“Except it is like highly confidential,” he said, according to the recording. “Secret. This is secret information. Look, look at this.”

“I was just thinking, because we were talking about it. And you know, he said, ‘he wanted to attack Iran,’” Trump said. “This was done by the military, given to me. I think we can probably, right?”

Trump then appears to again acknowledge the documents were still considered classified information, according to CNN’s recording.

“See, as president I could have declassified it,” Trump said. “Now, I can’t, you know, but this is still a secret.”

“Yeah,” a staffer said. “Now we have a problem.”

CNN suddenly stumbling across the leaked audio further eroded the public’s trust in both mainstream media and the Biden administration, former White House press secretary Kayleigh McEnany said, according to the Washington Examiner.

“We need confidence in our government, in our institutions. And clearly, this doesn’t instill much when this is getting leaked to the likes of CNN,” she told Hannity, noting that the DOJ and FBI have sunk to new lows of 30% public approval.

The CNN leaked audio covered in large parts ground seemingly already trampled by Fox News in an interview last week, when Trump explained the conversation in context.

“There was no document. That was a massive amount of papers and everything else talking about Iran and other things,” Trump said. “I didn’t have a document per se. There was nothing to declassify. These were newspaper stories, magazine stories and articles.”

CNN’s tape rehash dropped in the wake of the Biden administration’s reported efforts to use the Titan sub tragedy to sideline media attention from the president’s growing legal problems, along with a rash of conveniently-timed mainstream coverage of an alleged coup in Russia. Several whistleblower revelations that reportedly linked Biden directly to his son’s shady business dealings have also received a mainstream media blackout.

“CNN releases tape of Donald Trump admitting on hot mic to world leaders and journalists in the room ‘I sold a lot of state secrets’” cracked Human Events’ Jack Posobiec. “oh wait waitaminute.”

A Trump spokesperson derided CNN’s report, writing that “The media and the Trump-haters once again were all too willing to take the bait, falling for another Democrat-DOJ hoax, hook, line, and sinker.”

The spokesperson noted that “The audio tape provides context proving, once again, that President Trump did nothing wrong at all. The President is speaking rhetorically and also quite humorously about a very perverted individual, Anthony Weiner, who was deep inside the corrupt Clinton campaign.” 

In its new coverage of the old tape, CNN reported that the audio revealed Trump saying “these are the papers” and referring to something he called “highly confidential,” which the network claimed contradicted his comments to Fox News.

Trump responded to CNN’s report with a blistering rebuke posted on Truth Social, where he reiterated his charges of election interference and accused Biden’s Justice Department of leaking the tape to CNN.

“The deranged Special Prosecutor, Jack Smith, working in conjunction with the DOJ & FBI, illegally leaked and ‘spun’ a tape and transcript of me, which is actually an exoneration rather than what they would have you believe,” Trump wrote.

Firebrand conservative attorney and media personality Mark Levine also addressed the likelihood of government leaks designed to bolster the DOJ’s case against Trump in the classified documents prosecution.

“There must have been several scores of leaks against Trump involving testimony, documents, audio, etc., and they’re all obviously coming from the government,” Levine tweeted in response to CNN’s report.

“Trump’s lawyers need to file an immediate motion, with the long list of leaks as an exhibit, asking that the entire case be dismissed because of prosecutorial misconduct and the government’s effort to influence the jury pool,” Levine advised.

“Moreover, I would insist that the court determine whether DOJ has opened investigations into these felonies.  THIS NEEDS TO HAPPEN NOW!”

Historic-Low Approval Ratings Plague Kamala amid Biden Scandals

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA)  Vice President Kamala Harris has garnered the highest net negative approval ratings in the history of U.S. vice presidents, according to a recent NBC News Poll, marking yet another low for the Biden White House, which is already mired in scandal.

Conducted between June 16 and June 20, the poll revealed that 49% of registered voters hold a negative opinion of Harris, with only 32% viewing her favorably, resulting in the unprecedented 17-point net-negative rating.

The NBC News report stated that Harris’s net-negative percentage is the lowest ever recorded for any vice president in the poll’s history.

The significant decline in approval comes on the heels of recent controversies plaguing the Biden administration, including a plea deal by Hunter Biden, the president’s son, and revelations from IRS whistleblowers who claimed that Biden’s Justice Department repeatedly and wrongly interfered in Hunter Biden’s criminal probe.

Adding fuel to the fire, an explosive WhatsApp text message, released by the House Committee on Ways and Means, showed Hunter Biden demanding action from a Chinese contact while mentioning his father’s presence. This message contradicts Biden’s previous claims that he never discussed foreign business dealings with his son.

Following the release of the poll, several political commentators took to social media to express their reactions to Harris’s historic low approval ratings.

Radio host Erick Erickson summarized the sentiment, saying, “A majority of Americans have deep, deep concerns about Biden’s physical and mental state; Kamala Harris is the least liked Vice President in the poll’s history.”

Charlie Kirk, the founder and CEO of Turning Point USA, chimed in, saying, “What did you expect when your VP is an affirmative action hire who slept her way to the top?” 

The poll also shed light on former vice presidents’ approval ratings, with Mike Pence receiving a 34% positive rating and a 38% negative rating, resulting in a net-negative of 4. During his tenure as vice president, Joe Biden held a 34% positive rating and a 33% negative rating, resulting in a net-positive of 1.

In contrast, Dick Cheney enjoyed a 47% positive rating and a 24% negative rating, resulting in a net-positive of 23. Similarly, Al Gore received high approvals, with 42% positive and 27% negative ratings.

The poll also revealed that former President Donald Trump has significantly increased his lead in the GOP primary for the 2024 presidential election, with 51% of Republican primary voters indicating their intention to vote for him.

Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis garnered 22% support, while Pence received a mere 7% of support, further highlighting the political landscape’s shifting dynamics.